DELPHI4Test2014
Grafritning ¦ Jan2022 — UNIVERSUMS
HISTORIA | 2011V4 ¦ 2022I18 | a
production
| Senast uppdaterade version: 2023-07-14 YMD ¦ HumanRight
is a knowledge domain
content · webbSÖK äMNESORD på
denna sida Ctrl+F • SubjectINDEX • all files • helpStart
DISPOSITION
MainDocument — Med vidare utvecklingar Från DELPHI 4 Test
2011
C:\Dok11\CopWin95\CopyCwin95\DOKs97\Matemat\Integral0.wps
GRUNDINTEGRALER Med PREFIXxSIN
· generellt obestämda integraler
BASIC INTEGRALS in PREFIXxSIN
· generally undetermined integrals ([x=0] ≠ [y=0]) ¦ student crashes on it
unless
aqcuainted, most definitely, see testDetermined example further below
The
above expressions are here just for a short overview from earlier works in UH —
more document space is needed to relate.
THIS
SUBJECT IS tremendously HUGE — it easily fills (innumerable) BOOKS with
many heavy pages.
—
So interesting one could die for half of it. Absolutely.
Introduction
to Cosmic Existence — related mathematics and physics:
gravitation
energy E = Gm2/r
= G(n→∞)m2/r(n→∞) = WORK = Fr = G(m/r)2 · r:
as much as is collected by fall, is returned by recoil — if
the bounce is
free from frictional losses: zero viscosity: all ideal mechanics
Probably THIS IS perhaps the most difficult to
understand and apprehend CONDITION — state: no change — that exists, at all:
— THE
SURFACE UNDER THE M-GRAPH IS LIMITED — has a definite top max value = 1 square
unit
—
despite the very fact that there is no point where its surface ends, reaches
its x axis: »limited by The Endless» as
in 1 = (x→∞)/(x→∞).
• The surface form extends infinitely: never
ends, never stops, restlessly continuing to extend without ever stopping.
• This example explains the core of the concept ∞ ”endless”, ”without limit” or (as in related mathematics and
physics): the quantity independent.
See Application further below. The
following ranks explain the above curvatures.
Dn (I=y) = y’ = d[(1+x–2)–1/2]/dx = (1+x–2)–1/2
– 1 = –3/2(–1/2)(–2)x–2–1=–3 = (1+x–2)–3/2x–3
= (x2+1)–3/2
= M modus
[modus, from Latin: way, manner, fashion ¦ »measure»] — the derivative, the variation: the variant [as selected term] in related mathematics.
M = (x2+1)–3/2 ; surface form
I = (1+x–2)–1/2
¦ limes(1 + 1/[x→∞]2)–1/2
= (1 + 0)–1/2 = 1 surface limit ¦
M =
I(M) = dy = y = (x2+1)–3/2 dx = (1+x–2)–1/2
= I ; testDetermined:
1/∞ = d1
0 ; 1/ 0 1/(1/∞) = ∞
¦ x=0: [(1+1/02)–1/2] = [(1+1/0)–1/2] → [1/(1+∞)1/2]
= 0 ¦ the integral is already determined =
good to go for surface calculations;
1/∞ = d1 0
; 1/ 0 = 1/(0 d1
= 1/∞) = ∞
= (1/∞)–1 .
Modern
academy: Say it — this is wrong:
Forcing the
student to study destructive ideas of mathematics for collecting merits in
praising academic thinking
EXEMPLIFYING
MODERN ACADEMIC (1800+) GENERAL inventive DESTRUCTIVITY IN
(INTEGRAL systematic) MATHEMATICS with practical examples, see Si1 (first system integral) ¦ ZeroIntegral ..
— It resembles a veritable nightmare. (Please say I’m dreaming, make me wake up from this horrible torment ..).
Related physics and mathematics First
System Integral:
IT cannot be
expressed in modern academic manners
— without completely destroying its STRUCTURAL usability:
nature — as in Euler’s Equivalents. Say again.
— HOW MANY OF THE STUDENTS HAVE DISCOVERED THAT? Say. Please do share.
My tip: none. Not one. Say it: that is wrong. Come again.
CosmoA: ComIn
APPLICATION from CosmicIntro
So. Now that we have a first solid proof of the meaning and
function of the quantity independent ∞, what it means, what it stands for, and how to use it: Let us
compile to know the most prominent expressions in RELATED physics and
mathematics (because modern academy apparently
has no representation here) where it exhibits its most prominent status:
ACCORDING TO THE apparently well RELATED by detail MATHEMATICAL INTERPRETATION
the reader may very well express a different opinion by
related argumentation, please share
ON THE EQUIVALENTS
physics: E = Fd = G · m2 · m/d² · d = Gm2/d :
gravitational energy equivalents
FRACTAL property — the atomic nucleus property ¦ hollow
toroid ±e fractals
— as deduced in TNED: The Planck Ring.
Physics 7th in TNED: PASTOM — principle structure of mass.
Related physics.
c
= λf =
λ(n→∞)f(n→∞)–1
= λ(n→∞)–1f(n→∞):
absolute time measuring cannot be made based on electric devises: local
gravitation compromises that.
E
= hf = h(n→∞)f(n→∞)–1
= h(n→∞)–1f(n→∞):
PlanckRINGstructure(atomicNucleus)Constant: see PlankRING1 and
PlankRING2:
There is an uncertainty level for each
fractal level — not only the one (the atomic nucleus) on the Rim to the
macrocosmic domain, thank you very much.
mathematics:
Equivalents are equivalents. Math is Math.
E = Gm2/r
= G(n→∞)m2/r(n→∞)
¦ the cosmic c0-body: endless supply provides
a constant [Kcell] pulsational work
IT apparently IS further SUGGESTED THAT:
THE MODERN (1800+) ACADEMIC IDEA OF A MATHEMATICALLY EXPLAINABLE COSMIC EXISTENCE based on a (1800+) academically suggested limited quantity of mass, apparently and mathematically provably in to the very last cosmic Boltzmann atom
IS A DELUSION based ON provable MATHEMATICAL IGNORANCE:
Available Gravitational
Energy: G · (n→∞)m22/r(n→∞)
: SUPPLY(m→∞) – HEAT(m→γ) = Kcell the cosmic central ever pulsating K-cell :
mathematics’ simple solution
— Claim whatever you want, in whatever manner you want.
Absolutely. The doors are always open 24/7:
• Universe has a
central gravitation center: gravitational red shift
phenomena guaranteed.
See further in THEMORESOM.
———————————————
Experimental
Confirmations ¦ Physics
First ¦ K-cellHeatPhysics ¦ The
Electric Constant ¦ all natural constants:
— .. excuse me: mathematical ignorance? Explain.
— Yes.
NOT because of any defect in INTELLIGENCE. Absolutely not. No way.
— Apparently more because less acquainted with the innate content: more interested in inventing than deducing,
• HENCE: spontaneous
generation of (weed) BLOCKAGES — by drift, not plan —
blocking a deeper and broader understanding of the nature we live in. Nobody wanted it to be so.
If there are arguments against, please do share. Searched for. None yet found;
Not one word HumanRight = a knowledge domain: gravitation, electricity: LIFE. Question is:
— Do these leading world PhD aces even understand The Natural Concept? Say.
— »To me, you seem so fucked up, I would be surprised if you found your way to the parking»,
(SHOOTER, Mark Wahlberg 2007).
c0 = 2.99792458 T8 M/S
Case history:
Oct2018 A direct hit shows up on the TNED K-cell deduced Sun photometric IAU test:
3.827500101 T26 W ........................... TNED
3.827500000 T26 W ........................... ± 0.0014 IAU standard 2015¦2018
TNED used constants from The instrumental epoch [1960-1999]
8.8543 C/VM
...................................... ε0NUMERIC
the schoolbook value electric
constant
6.67 t11 JM/(KG)2
............................. G the universal gravitation constant
[1960+ scientific literature]
1.9896618301 T30 KG
...................... mS Sun mass now, Kepler’s 3rd on Earth anomalistic
period t in [r³/t²]/[G/4pi²]
1.991 532 855 300 T30 KG ............... mSbegin part of the IAU-test result — @
1025.048157738 Mpc
....................... rVIZ UniverseEdgevisibleRIM, iterative variable
in the test, see ITERATIONS
Nov2022+
Extended IAU-tests [ IAU-test SunAGE 20.805 Gy ] on an alternatively suggested
G-significand 6.6701566963 from TheGtest
in the planetary perihelion precession subject:
Further IAU-tests including the electric constant on the
more precise 4 pi value 8.8541878176 t12 gives dramatically improved IAU-test
results:
BA1978: 1AU=1.495 978 700 T11 M ¦ EarthAnomalistic ENCARTA99 365.2596425d , 1d = 86400 S
3.82750000000000
T26 W ................ TNED full 12/14 decimal precision
3.82750000000000 T26 W ................ ± 0.0014 IAU standard 2015¦2018
:
8.85418781762039
C/VM .................. ε0NUMERIC
= 1/(4π t7 AM/VS · c02) shows direct dramatic precision
improvement
6.67010000933000
JM/(KG)2 ........... G KcellAnalys2022a.ods T1 compiled ColH ¦ T2 iterated source
H31¦E50
1.98963199772617
T30 KG ............. mS Sun mass now: [r³/t²]/[G/4pi²] — no need for
tests anymore
1.99269226386621 T30 KG .............. mSbegin part of the IAU-test result — @
1025.0072676381 Mpc
...................... rVIZ UniverseEdgevisibleRIM, iterative
variable in the test
From here we continue the IAU-tests only by
examining results preserving the significands 3.827 500 000 000 00:
Jan2023+
Beginning to test on the primary raw adopted parameters
K=1.5, tau2.7°K and DspaceAverage 1HydrogenAtomPer10M³ [in rVIZ 1000MPc]
on finding more precise data references — tau 2.725
°K — along with the earlier result rVIZ = 1025.077MPc:
The precision results
• allows direct
calculation of the planet’s anomalistic periods — for direct instrumental
observational comparison
• allows direct
calculation of the planet’s perihelion precession values — for direct
instrumental observational comparison
• allows direct
calculation of the former composed general natural constant K-cell equation
r0c:
SolenT2022.ods T2 A217
THE INSTRUMENTAL EPOCH standard values u(1.66033) h(6.62559) nU(1.0086652)
also with the original standard 6.67 for G
have already been accounted for in the first (Oct2018) IAU standard values comparing test.
Result:
• While the standard (1960-1999) values (excellently) match the IAU 3.8275 ± 0.0014 value, the later data epoch (2000+) values does not satisfy the Sun photometric value in this TNED related physics general K-cell cosmological test.
We
suspected the reason to be a prominent New Era Time for Computering Older
School Results — which entails »adding parameters to make it look more the way
we Aces like it». Not good.
See the resuming IAU-test in the EndTEST.
Further attempting tests on the data standard values (e u h) only underlined the already stated result. See TESTING OTHER CANDIDATES.
While a positive test would show enhanced precision values on a further iterative basis, the tested candidates exposed a divergent attitude: even worse — IF the IAU precision result is respected.
But it should
also be noted: We have not tested all possible combinations. These here
reported results are valid only to the extent of them here presented details.
FurtherPendingTESTS:
With the r0c solved, all the natural constants have now found their (basic) significands in the TNED deduced K-cell cosmological equation (»the general G equation» as above).
Having found a more precise value for the (tauP) cosmological background radiation (originally adopted 2.7 °K) presents a new challenge on a further IAU-test:
• The more precise value 2.725 from the former 2.7 reduced r0c:
• Adopting the IAU-tested higher zVIZ(1025Mpc) from the former 1000Mpc has the opposite effect on r0c. So:
• In preserving the G-equation calculated r0c, some of the former (raw) parameters hence must be adjusted. Type: 1HydrogenPer10M³ original average visual universal space (BA1978s381sp2mn) to 1HydrogenPer10.1M³. These minor adjustments would (hence) be acceptable in preserving the G-equation results — as the BA1978-data on this level anyway are approximated values, what we know.
• Given the r0c value, the K-cell mass m0cK value follows.
REPCONCONE: CosmoA As of
21Jan2023 results in
SolenT2022.ods T2
A144
RELATED PHYSICS’ COSMOLOGICAL NATURAL CONSTANTS’ EQUATION
———————————————
The
Electric Constant ¦ Experimental
Confirmations ¦ Physics
First ¦ G ¦ CosmicBACKGROUNDvalueQuotes ¦ u h nU c0 ¦ 18 ¦ Number18 — the short version [the energy part should
not have been mentioned Jan2020 at that stage in this UniverseHistory
production. But it so happened it came along — sort of cropped — anyway. Truth
is: We are not there until the instrumental proof stands on the table].
WHAT WE KNOW:
• No fathomable for the average pedestrian
corresponding »direct cosmological equation for test» exists in modern quarters.
No way.
— How can that so surely be stated?
— Dmax.
Absolutely. Our Atomic Universe. (In other words ..)
— Get the fuck out of my
beach.
REMARKS
• Granting (CaseHistory) the results based on further IAU-tests (12 decimals) certified G (universal gravitational constant) and mS (present Sun mass) values taken through THE ELECTRIC CONSTANT ε0 = 1/(4π t7 AM/VS · c02) = 8.85418781762039 C/VM, these will be used here in UH on all further tests for further improvements.
• The IAU-test performs only a SUN age test — as in the IAU verifying result:
• SunAGE: 20.805 Gy.
Original approximated result: rounded KcellAGE: 16.295 + 4.52 = 20.815
Gy ¦ mPspace = 10.193146 ¦ T1 J16
The Cambridge International
Astronomy BA1978s324sp2n
states a rough average galaxy distance 3Mpc.
That distance by K-cell expansion
time from its detonation moment responds to a smallest possible time margin
near 10My [CRITERIArZ]. Same as a most close
possible birth of our Milky Way Galaxy as an ejected J-body from the
detonation’s K-cell inner wall. Resulting approximated MilkyWaySunAGE: 20.815 —
0.01 = 20.805Gy:
That yields: A first approximated
age of our galaxy and its possible Solar Systems in Milky Way: 20.805Gy.
So the [most precise] IAU-test
was launched on that approximated premise of a 20.805 Gy old Solar system. From
there the other parameters were iterated for IAU matching verifications [now
12¦14 decimals].
As such, only the IAU matching
result (3.827500000000) will continue to grant further accuracy on that
premise.
• With the (REPCONCONE) more precise results from the COSMIC BACKGROUND RADIATION reported measures, a corresponding adjusted value of the KcellAGE appears:
Exemplified: From original approximations to further precise:
mPspace 10.193146 ¦ rKVIZ 1000.0000 ¦ tauP 2.70000 ¦ KcellAGE 20.815Gy
mPspace 10.104004 ¦ rKVIZ 1025.0072 ¦ tauP 2.72548 ¦ KcellAGE 20.848Gy ........DIFFERENCE: + 33My
• Attempting from here (22Jan2023) to calculate the past history of our Galaxy and its Solar Systems (max 6007, TNED says, if similar to our own [PlutoStatusPreference]) THEN INEVITABLY that reckoning must pay some attention to a smallest possible OFFSET time margin on the named 33 My million years magnitude;
— That is: How the Milky Way galaxy group gravity center possibly came to reside near the Andromeda galaxy group gravity center; rZ by 33My makes d=vt=c0·33My =
10.1180223049 Mpc — all provided both really reside near the (c0) K-cell center. Shorter:
— Present rough distance MilkyWay-Andromeda = 0.7Mpc. Assuming an already parked centered Andromeda: how did Milky get there from a smallest birth distance some 10Mpc?
See further details from SunAGE (The K-cell TNED solution is almost dirty).
Detailed in RelatedPlanckCMB
COSMIC BACKGROUND RADIATION reported measures
TNED relates CMB in RelatedPlanckCMB (conventionally termed Cosmic Microwave Background radiation):
rcx = (tPmax=16.3Gy) · c0/2√[(K=1.5)2 + 1]
It resembles (up til tPmax) the radius rcx inside space of a light radiating sphere — a ball lamp seen from its inside — expanding simultaneously with the K-cell developed heat physics (Stefan-Boltzmann radiation law basics). The corresponding radiation temperature value can be calculated from the Wien displacement law (Planck radian law derivative) together with a known mean Doppler effect constant (K gravitational redshift sensitive). See further TNED data in (BaseDATA) and K-cell Pmax. See also The statistical free Full PLANCK RADIATION LAW DEDUCTION from Planck’s entropy expression, and the more simply deduced Planck radiation law.
Maybe one of astronomy’s greatest moments, Jan1990:
Hassani2017
” Less than two months later, COBE had sent enough information that the investigators could construct the shape of the radiation curve. Was the curve that of a black body radiation as predicted by Equation (12.46)? In the winter meeting of the American Astronomical Society held outside Washington, DC, on January 13, 1990, one of the principal investigators put up an image (reproduced in Figure 12.4) of the plotted data points on the screen.
An eerie silence fell over the audience, which immediately turned into frenzied applause and a standing ovation.
The data points fell exactly on the theoretical curve!
The CBR was a black body radiator, and its temperature was
2.725 ± 0.001undefinedK.”,
COSMIC
BACKGROUND RADIATION
ScienceDirect
(20Jan2023) — Limited access articles ¦ Cosmic Background Radiation
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/physics-and-astronomy/cosmic-background-radiation
Early
Universe ¦ Sadri Hassani, in Special Relativity, 2017
12.5
Cosmic Background Radiation
Wikipedia2023
” The cosmic microwave background (CMB, CMBR) is microwave radiation that fills all space. It is a remnant that provides an important source of data on the primordial universe.[1]
Precise measurements of the CMB are critical to cosmology, since any proposed model of the universe must explain this radiation.
The CMB has a thermal black body spectrum at a temperature of
2.72548±0.00057 K.[5] ”,
WIKIPEDIA
Cosmic microwave background (20Jan2023)
PROBLEM STILL WITH WIKIPEDIA IS THE (GROWING)
SPECIAL ACCESS to the Wikipedia article specified data:
• ANY
HUMAN IS NOT ALLOWED TO READ THE CONTENT. No access. And then: it is a
meaningless information — no matter its accurate content. Science is for all
humans, independent of status — or not at all. Stop killing humanity.
Reorganize.
IF
Wikipedia refers a purchasable BOOK: REPORT THE CITE. Show
the actual claim in readable letters. Make science available for all, without
distinction. Leave no one behind.
STOP REFER SOURCE DATA THAT NEEDS PAYMENT TO
BE VERIFIED AS APPREHENDED. Stop killing humanity.
•
That which is not visible on the table, has no referring value.
Barrow1994
” Det var det mest perfekta svartkroppsspektrum man någonsin sett i naturen och en slående bekräftelse på att universum en gång varit åtminstone hundratusentals grader hetare än det är idag.”,
UNIVERSUMS
FÖDELSE (The origin of the universe 1994), John D. Barrow, Natur och
Kultur 1995, s24
freely
translated:
It was the most
perfect black body radiation spectra one had ever seen in nature, and a
striking confirmation that the universe once was at least hundreds of thousands
degrees hotter than it is today.
IN the TNED deduced K-cell
expansion heat physics mathematics, we can follow the deduced Stefan-Boltzmann
radiation law Planck HeatRIM wall sphere’s temperature history from the moment
of the K-cell detonation (tOFFSET: 1.983220 t4 S). It begins with a
τ ¦ °K = τrz = (P/[4πak· rZ2])1/4 yielding a
first primary τWALL of 2 255 705.364 °K. At power max after t@Pmax
16.321Gy on a Pmax = 3.89 T48W the Stefan-Boltzmann-Planck-Wall heat has
decreased to a the final heat sphere wall τWALL of 8.175 °K — which
it took 4.527 Gy to TIME TRAVEL to our assumed K-cell center region position
(MilkyWay-Andromeda galaxy group, see THE ANDROMEDA TEST) exhibiting with
Doppler and gravitational red shift components included, as deduced along with
a continued K-cell expansion history, the now familiar measured cosmic
background Planck heat radiation degree 2.723.. °K. See formula details in Related physics CMBdetails.
The fine CMB structure values
Barrow adds (s24-25) a further detail — without which the following (most likely) would not have been noted in UH — a difficult concept to grasp for the layman:
Inspecting the small millidegree fluctuations in the above Hassani2017 reported final CMB applause, a systematic diagonal difference was observed with respect to a given direction not here yet clarified on a related data source (The Move Aspect):
Barrow (translated, s25)
”.. means that we are moving through the radiation in a certain direction ..”.
The intensity of the radiation
”.. will appear greatest when we look in that direction and smallest 180 degrees away, and should therefore expose a characteristic variation as cosine for the angle .. ”sky’s great cosine” ..”.
Se further (explaining) details in RelatedPlanckCMB.
CONTINUING IN Appendage.
|
|
|
T2014Graf — HUVUDDELEN AV VERKTYGEN MAN BEHÖVER
FÖR AVANCERAD DATORANVÄNDNING I TEXT OCH BILD
DISPOSITION | 
Teckenförklaringar: MusKLICKVänster |
Höger: 
|
— RullaMushjulet FRÅN |
MOTDig: 
|
Se även i Ännu olösta programdetaljer
|
SlutaBörjaRita: |
Startexempel — mata in
x^2, tryck F11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Se alla
funktionskommandon i FUNKTIONSKOMMANDON |
Grafritningens EkvationsPanel med bildytan |
Se Grafexempel |
Utan
ett grafiskt analysverktyg, kommer man inte långt om det gäller att förstå en
matematisk funktions grundläggande uppförande i variationer.
Exempel i Grafexempel — typexempel (GRAFLÄRA) på olika
funktionsformer med inmatningsexempel.
Här
börjar man:
1. Tangent 0 öppnar EkvationsPanelen.
— Skriv in grafens matematiska funktion, x är
variabel — exemplet nedan inmatning x’2 = x^2 med Unit200 och Interval0,4.
Funktionstekniken
för grafritning bygger på plangeometrins xy-yta:
— metoden att tilldela bestämda numeriska
värden till variabeln x:
— x skrivs tillsammans med
exponentiella funktionsuttryck (2^x), logaritmiska funktionsuttryck (ln[x]),
och trigonometriska (PREFIXxSIN: sin[x], sec[x]=1/sin[x], asin[x]) funktionsuttryck [‡1].
2. Tangent F11 ritar Grafen.
3. Ekvationspanelen göms/avslutas med
ESCapeTangenten.
Tangentkommandon och inställningar visas i Funktionskommandon.
Ekvationspanelen, Grafritning
EscSluta 0Öppna F11Rita
UppHöjtTill
tecken valfritt som ^ eller Primtecknet ’ (tangenten till höger om Ä)
Bokstaven
x anger variabel i samtliga fall — x-axelns enhet i rektangulära och
vinkeltalet x radianer i polära koordinater:
—
Testa själv valfria x-mixer: det är i princip omöjligt att göra fel: alltid
visas något resultat.
UnitBoxen
till vänster, pixelvärden: IntervallBoxen i mitten — p står för pi-enheter, t för Turns i Polära koordinater, decimala värden är tillåtna;
Ekvationsboxen
till höger — MAX 200 tecken
— TABB-tangenten kan användas
för att hoppa/ändra fokus mellan imatningsboxarna.
— NOTERA ATT: En del av UtförandeKommandona
MED TANGENTER fungerar INTE så länge någon av UnitInterval-boxarna är markerade
för inmatning. TABba till Ekvationsboxen.
— Vilka tangentkommandom som är undantagna
redovisas i tabellen nedan med FUNKTIONSKOMMANDON, de är markerade [Undantag] och länkar hit.
Översikt
GRAFRITNINGENS OLIKA
TANGENTKOMMANDON, VERKTYG OCH FUNKTIONER
Se även komplementär
beskrivning i Test2011, GRAFRITNINGENS
FUNKTIONSDETALJER.
— Den delen [från2011] är
delvis mera detaljerad än beskrivningen här, men innehåller å andra sidan ingen
direkt reguljär utskrift på samtliga funktionskommandon.
— Dessa ges här nedan i FUNKTIONSKOMMANDON Grafritningen.
MAX 200 tecken tillåts (f.n.) i
inmatningsboxen.
UpphöjtTill skrivs med
’(prim)tangenten (till höger om Ä) eller ^-tangenten (till höger om Å).
Pi (3,14 ...) skrivs med
Ctrl+P.
Naturliga
e-logaritmen (2,718 ...) skrivs med Ctrl+e.
Bokstäver (utom ovan) skrivs ut kursiverade
och behandlas som konstanter = 1.
— Vanliga rundparenteser ( ) och rakparenteser [ ] är tillåtna — inmatningen kollar
automatiskt att korrekt matchning och antal gäller typ ([([...])]...) — vid fel
typ (x)] avbryts riten med felmeddelande typ:
.
FUNKTIONSKOMMANDON, Grafritningen
|
Ctrl | Shift | Alt |
+ |
Tangent |
Funktion |
|
|
|
0 |
visar ekvationspanelen |
|
|
|
F11 |
ritar grafen |
|
Ctrl |
+ |
F11 |
Ritar grafen med 0;0
vid Markören, vidare F11 bibehåller |
|
Alt |
+ |
F11 |
Återställer
grafritningen med 0;0 centrerat i programfönstret |
|
|
|
F2 |
Rensar bildytan |
|
|
|
ESC |
gömmer|avslutar
grafritningsverktyget |
|
|
|
Enter |
skriver ut ekvationen
[x^2] i matematisk form [Flytbild]
[Utförs normalt automatiskt
med F11]. |
|
Ctrl |
+ |
Enter |
utför|skriver ut
numeriska beräkningar [ex: 2*pi]:
|
|
Ctrl |
+ |
|NP|komma |
[Undantag]. Växlar mellan
indikering för Singel Multipla Växling sker även med
VäMusKlick på området. I läge |
|
Alt |
+ |
P |
[Undantag]. växlar och Växling sker även med
VäMusKlick på området. Markeringarna i
formindikatorerna
Färgval sker via palett med tangent F4 [Flytbild] — en enklare palett kommer fram som flytbild
— därifrån gäller Tangenterna A S C som ovan: Sätt Peken över önskad färg och
välj A|S|C. Åter till ekvationsboxen med F11. — Standart ShiftF11 ger
KurvfärgSvart,KryssfärgMellanGrå,RutnätsfärgLjusGrå. Polära steglängden i
gradenheter kan ändras med VäMusklick
:
Ange önskat intervall
och återgå med Enter. Standardvärdet är 360. |
|
Alt |
+ |
Pilar |
flyttar ekvationsboxen
| Steglängden väljs Ctrl+ |NP| 1 2 3 ¦ 1 5 20p |
|
Alt |
+ |
G |
[Undantag]. Visar|gömmer
rutnätet med UnitBoxens kvadratenhet i pixels. |
|
Alt |
+ |
S |
visar|gömmer
EkvationsProgrammet (användes mest för programmerarens körkontroller vid
programmets utveckling) |
|
Alt |
+ |
|NP|komma |
[Undantag]. Växlar indikering
mellan
och
Växling sker även med
VäMusKlick på området. |
|
Ctrl |
+ |
PrintScreen |
[Undantag]. Kopierar
Ekvationspanelen till Urklipp. |
|
Ctrl |
+ |
|NP|0 |
Kontrolläge, Även
MusKlickVänster i Ekvationsboxen. |
|
|
|
Home |
Åter |
, kan
kopieras direkt till Urklipp via Ctrl+C
Grafexempel — samlade exempel till Ekvationsboxen
— Graferna kan kopieras till Urklipp
med följande enkla tangentkommandon:
ESC (tar bort Ekvationspanelen), pila
Markören till insättningspunkten, tryck INSERT, en Insättningsflagga visas
överstHöger, tryck ner och håll MusVä nedtryck och pila till avslutande
insättningspunkt, Tryck INSERT igen; en uttagsrektangel är nu markerad (den
försvinner automatiskt med nedanstående efterföljande eller Klick);
— Tryck Ctrl+C för kopiering till
Urklipp, Ctrl+X för uttag (radering) till Urklipp, [eller Ctrl+D för duplicering direkt: Ctrl+Pilar flyttar
sedan kopian över bilden — eller andra alternativa BildHanteringsFunktioner (Rotera, Vänd, Invertera. m.fl.)].
Snygga till Grafer:
— Ytterligare snabba effektiva verktyg
finns (ZoomaUT, Z; Ctrl+ |NP| – + ... Ctrl+Z kopierar till Urklipp, ta in med
Ctrl+V ...) för att »snygga till» grafer generellt och få dem att se jämna och
fina ut.
— Särskilda exempel i ZoomGrafer.
— Aktuella funktioner och uttryck
redovisas separat i MATEMATISK
KONVENTION, om ej redan bekant.
RektanguläraKoordinater, Exempelsamling för
övning
1/x
;
1/(1+x) = (1+x)'–1
;
1/(x'2) = 1/x'2 = x'–2
;
1/(1+x'2) = (1+x'2)'–1
;
1–(1+x'4)'–1
;
x(1+x'2)'–2
;
(sin2þx)lnx
;
cos(2þ[x/2]'0.5)
;
sin(2þ[x/2]'2)
;
0(cos20x)+1(0.1è'–3sinx)
;
1(cos20x)+0(0.1è'–3sinx)
;
1(cos20x)+1(0.1è'–3sinx)
;
(cos20x)(0.1è'–3sinx)
;
(cos20x)(0.005è'–x)
;
0.01(cos20x)(0.05+x'2)'–2
;
2+sin2x'–1
;
2+sin2x'–1 = 2+sin2(x'–1) =
2+sin2/x = 2+sin(2/x) ...
— samma som ovan men i Polära
koordinater: frekvensen börjar ∞:
;
PoläraKoordinater, Exempelsamling för övning
och orientering
Grafen nedan ritad (förstorad,
sedan infärgad och utzoomad) successivt med växande radievärde (4):
(4x)+(cosx)+(2sin5x)^2
Varierande sinuskoefficient (2) ökar/minskar amplituden.
Exemplet nedan visar två överlagarade polärkurvor som ovan med olika värden:
inre: (4x)+(cosx)+(2sin5x)'2
yttre: (4x)+(cosx)+(3sin5x)'2
Nedan illusatrationer från
RADIOAKTIVA SÖNDERFALLETS FYSIK
http://www.universumshistoria.se/zrefRF.htm -
Atomkärnan_SINUSEKVIVALENTEN
*
Se även mera utförligt i
http://www.universumshistoria.se/Matematiken1.htm -
PREFIXxSIN
UniversumsHistoria
Konventionellt inom trigonometrin gäller
PREFIXxCOS: x-axeln = cosinus axel:
———————————————————————————
cos = x/r | sin = y/r | cosec = 1/sin | sec =
1/cos
För PREFIXxSIN gäller (det mycket enklare att
hålla reda på): x-axeln = sinus axel:
———————————————————————————
sin = x/r | cos = y/r | sec = 1/sin | cosec =
1/cos
— Enda skillnaden är att beteckningarna (koordinataxlarna
xy) sin|cos har ombytta platser.
— Vitsen med det rebelliska PREFIXxSIN är att
det blir MYCKET ENKLARE (för en nybörjare) att fatta och hålla reda på
trigonometrins allmänna systemordning jämfört med det krångliga etablerade
systemets PREFIXxCOS.
— Då man sedan väl fattat (den enkla)
ordningen, har det i princip ingen betydelse vilket SÄTT man väljer.
— För den rent teoretiskt beskrivande
ordningens skull används här genomgående PREFIXxSIN.
— Byt endast ut beteckningarna sin|cos mot
varandra i de olika sätten. Inget annat.
Ännu olösta
programdetaljer
Restlinje i LineTo
LineTo-ritningen inte alltid logisk (på
minussidan)
Se även i MATEMATISK
KONVENTION — representationen av
negativa rötter.
Exempel Point-rit — sanna grafen:
x'x
(–1)–1
= –(1/1) = –1;
(–2)–2
= 1/(–2)2 = 1/4;
(–3/2)–3/2
= (–1,5)–1,5 = (–2/3)1,5 = (–2)1,5(1/3)1,5
= (–2)1+0,5(1/3)1,5 = (–2)1(2)0,5(1/3)1,5 = –0,544331; ...
Exempel LineTo-rit — utjämnad graf:
x'x
Beskrivning:
LineTo-funktionen medför ibland icke önskade förbindelser:
— Speciellt
funktioner som går mot positivt|negativt oändligt invid ena sidan av y-axeln [
| ] och sedan antar ändliga värden på andra sidan, får i de fallen en icke
funktionstillhörande LineTo-linje i det mellanliggande orepresenterade
funktionsintervallet. Se även typexemplet ovan med x^x.
— En viss parering
har här gjorts i grafprogrammet på positiva sidan (den bör nu [15Aug2014] var helt ren från
oönskade extra linjer i Line-To-läget). Dock finns
fortfarande en del problem på negativa sidan.
— Det är viktigt
att känna till denna detalj för ev. undvikande av missgrepp.
— För exakt
grafisk tolkning, använd endast Point-ritningen.
Funktionsbegreppet
generellt i matematiken; Om ej redan bekant:
— se utförligt relaterat i
http://www.universumshistoria.se/MatematikenFunktion.htm
- Funktionsklasserna_beskr
AppendagePantB: —
Nov2022-Jan2023+ — FullDynamicsExplanation ¦ ContentPantB
CosmicIntro ¦ CosmoA ¦ CaseHistory ¦ REPCONCONE ¦ Remarks
¦ TauKelvinSources
ThePerihelionPrecessions ¦ ExplainingCoriolisPrecession
¦ ThePoint
¦ CausalNewton ¦ IncreasingTemperaturePressure
¦ SaturatedLightField ¦ TheExplanation ¦ rPdMATH ¦
TwienAffection
¦ CoriolisResolution ¦ AgainInConclusion ¦ ConcludingAllKeplerMath ¦ PrecessionEnergy ¦ ArguePoints ¦ POINT ¦ THEvDcRelation ¦ Newtons3inShort ¦
PotentialBarrier
¦ ExplainingTheDynamics ¦ FirstLIGHT ¦ UnderstadingActionReaction ¦ KeplerMomentumBasics ¦ GeDith ¦ APPLICATIONS 1-4¦ ThePrecessiveSTATEargument
¦
PerihelionPrecessionRotationalCenter ¦ CENTbyLightTime ¦
Appendix
¦ TheNeutronSquareBreakThrough ¦ TheStarAnvil ¦ TheIAUtest ¦ ConstantPRECISION ¦ SpaceElectricalResistance ¦ HowIsTemperatureGENERATED ¦ Rex
¦
CentralEnergyMachine
¦ HowTEMP
¦ ComptonEffect ¦ ModernDegenerationPressure
¦ PULSARS
¦
SunAge ¦ CRITERIArZ ¦ MilkyWayHistory ¦ PresentMilkyAndro ¦ PossibleAndromedaBirth
¦ ApossibleRotation
¦
CosmoBasics ¦ LimitESCAPEVELOCITY
¦ TEMORESOM ¦ CMBdetails ¦ RelatedCMB
¦ RelatedPlanckCMB
¦ CosmoB
AppendagePantB
The whole cosmic appearance did show — as
compressed —
in one single celestial phenomena: all the
foremost details in physics and mathematics:
the planetary
perihelion precession phenomena
The4P: AppendagePantB
THE PLANETARY PERIHELION PRECESSION PHENOMENA
Earlier related physics and mathematics
BACKGROUND MATERIAL:
The Galaxy Formations — 2009¦ Solar Systems In Milky Way — 2018 ¦ Dmax — TNED from 1993
• THE PERIHELION PRECESSION QUEST »opened up everything»
— the entire realm of cosmology: all details, every single aspect:
All Kepler/Planck
Mathematics
• Through the successful IAU-test (Oct2018) with further:
G = 6.67010000933003
T11 JM//[KG]2 — an impossible exercise to
measure practically, what we know; comparing
tests exposes the bottlenecks
mSUN = 1.98963199771721
T30 KG: these resulting figures emanate from a further use of the earlier 2018
IAU-test on our Sun.
rSSUN = 6.957 T8 M present established Solar Radius value
[Wikipedia, Solar radius] — consequence from mS.
rGSUN = 6.9657583598 T8 M SolenT2022.ods T1 A24 ; — consequence from mS.
• Precision determination of present Sun mass (mS) —
verified by comparing observations in the end results on the
perihelion precessions with
• Precision determination of G universal gravitational constant
verified by a further enhanced IAU-test on the Electric
Constant
WHAT is so special about
the perihelion precession phenomena? Even so heavy, that it CAN AT ALL collect
all the cosmological issues under One single explaining Idea? Even, too,
explaining WHY present and earlier modern (1800+) academic ideas could not
reach the RELATED RATIONAL LOGICAL explaining details? What? THE ENERGY SOURCE
— Sun’s FIRST build up (thermo nuclear, related physics) Temperature pressure.
The Precessional Rotation Agency:
• The preservation of the planetary Kepler area momentum parameters — with
zero impacting interference: light
physics does not connect kinetics (TheSolarEclipses ¦
TwoArguments ¦ GripDEEP ¦ ExperimentalConfirmations). There is only one such
possible physical source: THE STARTING POWER UP of the present corresponding
THERMODYNAMICAL EQUILIBRIUM — first light — inside the present Sun’s
gravitationally dependent planetary Light Field, no doubt.
• Modern academy had only part of the
mathematical solution — as blocked due to the Dmax issue: the atomic nucleus:
gravitation’s fundamental form.
FirstLightTable: THEcrFactors ¦ The4P ¦ FirstLIGHT ¦ PrecessionEnergy ¦ ConcludingAllKeplerMath
THE PLANETARY PERIHELION PRECESSION PHENOMENA
FirstLight — all planets already On:
———————————————
SolenT2022.ods
compiled columns from different cell blocks T2 A17+ ¦ Precession arcSec/100y — AllKeplerMath ¦ Electric Constant ¦
———————————————
The
end result. Jan2022. See TheRESULT.
• Without precise — IAU-tested on Sun’s
photometric effect — G and mS values, the quantities as above become
impossible. There can be only one appropriate precise fit.
G and present mS determined
G = 6.67010000933003
T11 JM//[KG]2 — an impossible exercise to
measure practically, what we know; comparing
tests exposes the bottlenecks
mSUN = 1.98963199771721
T30 KG: these resulting figures emanate from a further use of the earlier 2018
IAU-test on our Sun.
rSSUN = 6.957 T8 M present established Solar Radius value
[Wikipedia, Solar radius] — consequence from mS.
rGSUN = 6.9657583598 T8 M SolenT2022.ods T1 A24 ; — consequence from mS.
These two — G and mS — provided ideal classical physics — makes it (now) possible to
• calculate true Kepler Anomalistic Orbital Planetary Periods (at present only known for Earth’s orbit), and (hence — AllKeplerMath)
• perihelion precession values for all planets — for comparing on observed values.
— Does it fit?
— It better. Otherwise we’re smoked.
But an already
established Kepler Area Momentum physics BEFORE a first light apparently shreds
the present planetesimal idea of HOW our Solar system did come about. IT — a
FirstLight SIST — apparently demands that the Kepler Area Momentum — apparently
still today unaffected — was at work BEFORE any first light — so THAT first
light COULD introduce its extra perihelion precessional realizing Energy Input
on already rotating planets. First mass. THEN light.
The Dmax property in physics — the atomic nucleus, the Planck constant h
= mcr, The Neutron, is already standing on a zero: the atomic nucleus cannot be
compressed, Energy law: energy cannot be created, nor destroyed, only
converted; there is no origin of mass = energy. The idea of any existential —
cosmic — limited mass, has no rational, related logics to rely on. And
consensus is still not a subject in science: never was, never will be. The
deduced General State Equation explains the balance in terms of related
mathematics.
It seems that modern
corridors never did care about that type of reasoning. At least not on the
visible plane of the most prominent texts:
• With a given Dmax (Neutron block masses:
1.82 T17 KG/M²) the cosmological (Hubble 1929) expanding universe is resembled through (simple, documented)
water drop experiments:
• A (neutrons
in negative divergence: zero viscosity: no friction, no macroscopic active electromagnetism due to the strong Dmax gravitational tug) homogenous mass divides according to linear recoil momentum
mathematics (as water does it, in a near
resembling way) along with (conserved) a transverse angular (spin)
momentum mathematics. And there is little to add to that basic mathematics
except (LGD) light’s gravitational
dependency (not observed in modern quarters, see the Einstein
and Schwarzchild solutions).
The entire cosmological realm — on Dmax
• Through Dmax — it shreds (explains as primitive) modern (1800+) present cosmology ideas completely
— except as preserved: the basic Hubble 1929 observations of
the expanding universe, and all the following and former instrumental and
astronomical observations without which this quantified comparing presentation
definitely would not have seen the light of any day at all.
What
modern academic students never were promoted to study: the cosmologically
RELATED nature of physics. — and mathematics.
All based ob the deduced Planck Ring h= mcr: The Neutron.
All Kepler/Planck
Mathematics
all details explained, zero question marks — especially
those on modern academy desks
• Angular (Kepler Area) momentum preserved and conserved explains the entire concept.
In
modern quarters it is held »the other way around» [ ”water came from the outer” —
conclusive academic intelligence ]:
— A central (previously,
later exploded: the debris material) STAR is surrounded by debris — minor
masses type Saturn Rings stuff. By chance and random in time, it is held says
modern academy, that larger mass bodies are formed — bumping, glancing,
colliding .. That would be the modern version of the fantastic meaning and
origin of life that build the brain and its nervous system during some 3Gy on
Green Earth — no bald cuts — so that all the family members could exclaim with
deep admiration Oh Martha what a good tasting dinner. So: why not the rest too?
Is there a Troubling Nerve in there? Modern Academy 1800+ it was.
A FULL DYNAMICS EXPLANATION
All Kepler Math — it expalins the
phenomena in full detail — the final real steel end proof — or not a tall
THE REASON WHY MODERN ACADEMY M,ISSED THE ENTIRE
EXPLANATION:
When light first
builds up from a star in birth in its already established mass determined
gravitational field, the thermodynamical changes (LIGHT as INDUCTIVE ENERGY [COEI] wave frequency Planck energy E =hf QUANTA affects all ±e
charged atomic matter, no exceptions) accomplishes a
push — Potential Barrier, Compton effect
(also Photoelectric effect, see TwienAffection)
— on all mass matter’s (foremost exposed) atomic components. This — Perihelion Precession
— energy input on those masses however— related physics explains — does not connect
to the masses kinetic (Kepler momentum — gravitationally provided central force
action) properties. That so because light physics and kinetics do not connect.
See in explicit The Solar
Eclipses (TwoArguments)
provisions:
• light does not develop centrifugation properties:
• light is massless.
• gravitation is equal to all matter, cannot be shielded from:
time independent — while on the other hand
• light physics is unequal to all matter, can be shielded
from: time dependent.
— In modern
academy (1900+) a CONSENSUS idea blocked further studies on these properties —
in order to preserve already established academic cosmological ideas (The v+ic error).
The perihelion precession dynamics:
p = pG = (G/π)(m2/2r2)2 ; m2 = mS = Sun mass
TNED related
thermo nuclear radiation pressure's gravitational component
UNKNOWN IN MODERN ACADEMY.
p = pSB = (1/3) ·a’·T4 ;
General
Stefan-Boltzmann's temperature pressure expression
WELL KNOWN IN MODERN ACADEMY.
TGAMMA = r–1([G(m2)2/4π]/akP)1/4 ;
Tgamma — one of
Sun's 4 deduced heat degrees in related physics
UNKNOWN
IN MODERN ACADEMY. Modern academy only knows the T Planck heat degree,
none of the other three, what
is known here.
p = pG = pSB · TGAMMA ;
UNKNOWN IN MODERN ACADEMY.
because of an
unknown TGAMMA (and hence unknown pG) in modern quarters. See further WHY below.
Planetary
perihelion precessional energy is stored during the light field’s first start
up as IT brings with it the ordinary planetary Kepler area momentum — without
disturbing or interfering with its properties. We can know that it is so by
applying the classic Kepler area momentum mathematics on the calculations (AllKeplerMath). And then
compare the results with present instrumental observations. These should be
accurate — if
applicable.
• After the light start up period has
saturated the light field and a general thermodynamic equilibrium has
established, no further perihelion precessional energy input is possible —
except give or take on the small possible fluctuations around the average
stable star’s photometric effect (P = 3.8275 T26 W for our Sun).
Once given a
velocity in mass free space, it counts eternally
Ordinary Kepler Area
momentum — planetary ANOMALISTIC
orbital period: twice over same elliptic
point — conserves the individual planet’s gravitational relation with its star
(our Sun) — independent of influences from other masses.
Compare also the ArizonaWikipedia
Quote on the subject.
Adding significant gravitational influences
from other masses — and too the perihelion precession additions — brings with
them the ordinary Kepler orbit without destroying its original (»mother-child»)
properties (super
position principle).
F = Gm2m/r²; a =
F/m = Gm2/r² = å(centrifugation) = w²/r ; G = 6.67 t11
JM/(KG)² ;
w² = Gm2/r =
constant in mass free space — provided no impact
changing interference and constant m2
r = Gm2/w² ;
with an original constant w, r
can always be calculated
IF also the present m2 is known:
: Kepler area momentum K
= vr is
always conserved — with respect to solar mass losses
As the Sun loses mass during its burning
period, also the Kepler momentum average Sun distance is affected. However:
Provided those losses are known. the corresponding r can always be calculated.
Why the unknown in modern corridors?
• Dmax: the atomic
nucleus cannot be compressed — gravitation’s fundamental form — it is already
standing on a zero
:
The Planck Ring h = mcr: The Neutron [ the TNED deduced N3m20 aggregate ]
With Dmax as the base of cosmology, apparently the entire modern cosmological academic idea is shreded.
— There is not even a singla atom left of it.
• There is no comparing provisions.
ThePerihelionPrecessions: —
AppendageContent ¦
ExplainingCoriolisPrecession: —
ThePoint: Light And
Gravitation ¦ Suns4 —— MECHANICS in The Experiment
Ljusfysiken växelverkar inte med g-massor (Ljusfrihetssatsen
¦ Atomkärnans härledning: h=mcr).
Ljusfysiken
växelverkar enbart med den lokalt kraftgravitella masskroppens medbärande
ljusfält.
Light
physics does not interact with kinetics [Solar Eclipses 1919+ ¦ Two Arguments].
Light physics interacts only with a body’s local gravitationally dominant light field (Local Gdominance).
In atomic physics: the place
where a charge (Q)
is taken on: The Potential Barrier ¦ PotentialBarrier
— unknown in MAC
so formulated, or maybe totally unknown .. as such ..
The ultimate PROOF WOULD BE:
• Kepler area momentum mechanics (All Kepler Math) prevails unaffected from that anomalistic orbit’s separately added perihelion precession.
As it is here concluded: precession builds up from light field accelerating temperature pressure physics, while the Kepler part prevails unaffected. These two picture two different physical phenomena, confirming the already observed principle (Solar Eclipses, Two Arguments ¦ Light’s gravitational dependency) that: physics of light does not connect kinetics (related physics light’s liberty clause).
12Dec2022
PLANETARY PERIHELION PRECESSION EXPLAINING CORIOLIS EFFECT DYNAMICS
PLANETARY PERIHELION PRECESSION ENTAILS
CORIOLIS EFFECT DYNAMICS — on the build up
ALL BASIC KEPLER MATH, TNED RELATED STAR PHYSICS, AND EXPLAINING CORIOLIS EFFECT DYNAMICS
————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Coriolis effect 1882 on Light’s
gravitational dependency LGD ¦ Suns4
and Bradley’s Aberration 1725 from basic Kepler 1600 mathematics
A NEWTON’S THREE RELATIONAL MATRIX —
translation-rotation
the radial — centrifugal push
[RegularCoriolis] — transfer
———————————————
GENERATRIX and DIRECTRIX nomenclature ¦ Thermal-LIGHT PRESSURE DETAILS ¦ PerihelionPrecessionRotationalCenter
THE PERIHELION PRECESSION PHENOMENA turned out to »demand an explanation to everything»
— in the cosmological complex as a whole. The birth of LIGHT in our Solar system: a precise, no speculative, precessional energy source resolving answer. The Impossible Kinetic-Mechanic Interaction demanding a fully resolved logical explanation between an apparently PRESERVED ordinary Kepler Area Momentum planetary motion, and the associated Orbital Perihelion precession. A more detailed and exact — quantitative, really — solution to G and the present mS Sun’s mass (The Electric Constant) for proving a The RESULT worthy to stand upright in line with instrumentally observed and established values. All Kepler Math. Really. Say again.
THEcr: ThePrecessions
The cr-factors
(1—[e=0¦CirculartOrbit]²)=1
incorporated (Two
Arguments ¦ The Circle Argument)
6πRGm2/(cr)2 = 24π3R4/(Tcr)2 ; substitutions on cr
— incorporating a LIGHT factor c — along with 1–e² : celestial orbital
equalities [CEPH]: ¦
vr → cr : Kepler/Planck
=
24π3R2/(Tc)2(1–e2) ; The
Wikipedia/Einstein RADIAN expression — STILL no sign of relativity theory
here. Just plain [substitutional] Kepler math:
(5.2).1 (aC)u/v0(1–e2) = 3[Gm2/c0]/[
γ ( r–1([G(m2)2/4π]/akP)1/4 )–1](1–e2) × (360°·3600’’·100y/[Tanom/y]) ; compare in The RESULT
prove the Kepler Math
relevance on the TNED deduced Suns4:
unknown territory in modern corridors — MAC, short for modern academy in UH (universehistory);
Perihelion
precession phenomena — its related origin, explanation and mathematics
pMAX
— with precise gravitational radial
balance — at r from Sun’s ideal g-center is determined from
For Earth at 1AU
from Sun, p is 41 953.32196855 Pascal (=N/M²). It is theoretically touched by
the Earth’s local dominant 40 Earth radii g-sphere when v=c
around the Sun. As the left side of the illustration suggests, this thermal
light pressure p-physics is »Dynamic»:
m meets no mass objects on its path through empty space:
m:s v continues to be m:s v unhindered by the thermal pressure p; Once a
certain p-synchronization front-back due to v>0 has established, the
pressure components are stable — as they are as well when v=0.
The only difference between the situation
v=0 and v>0 is that the line m-Sun with v>c no longer is the same as the
straight time independent gravitational m-Sun connection (Grip Deep ¦Solar eclipses — light does not connect kinetics, does not
develop kinetics: gravitation does not propagate bound by time, as however
light does, but modern academy does not understand, or does not want to
understand the concept). It is the same curve seen from m (Earth) as
the James Bradly 1725 discovered Aberration phenomena. On right angles to the
v-direction its directrix — the curve
tangent grasping on m — follows the simple relation v/c — as also the
perihelion precession phenomena does (The simple Eddington
form). This v/c directrix does connect a
corresponding (time delayed) connection to the Sun, along the curved (generatrix)
Bradley light path.
The inertial change from 0 to v, or any
change within a given v to another v — a = dv/dt — »immediately» reflects on a
new pressure p front-back situation — in time propagating with c along the
Bradley path. In Earth’s case, it reaches the Sun and its g-center after some 8
minutes (Light Time).
This type of
reasoning has no here known corresponding representation in modern quarters.
Thermal pressure equivalents explain the basic vector
action-reaction dynamics:
light’s gravitational dependency interactions (LGD). The only last missing puzzle
peace then, as it seems, was the answer to the question: how. From where (POINT). Answer:
• First solar system
established sunlight energy accelerates a first build-up thermal pressure preference
on exact related included Coriolis action-reaction mathematics and physics. It leads to the present
instrumental observations — on exact available
mathematics and explaining physics.
• But that type
of reasoning — no »random by chance», no »planetesimal impacting» (Two Arguments): definitely no relativity — directly excludes — kills — modern cosmologic
cosmological corridors. Say again.
In modern corridors the
Solar system history (Kant nebular hypothesis) begins with a central already
shining star or sun for a planetary system.
In related physics — as
illustrated by water physics — the K-cell expansion (Edwin Hubble
1929) throws out Dmax masses on angular momentum physics mathematics —
centrifugation: rotations — before any star begins to produce light by its
(soon coming) inner thermonuclear reactions.
The primary solar system bodies on equal max
density Dmax.
In TNED related physics the Sun needs (at least) a first 5 year window before it reaches a full photometric
effect. By that time, the planets have already settled in their Kepler
orbitals. Then light’s gravitational dependency (LGD) begins to play.
CausalNewton: PerihelionPrecessions
Causal Relational Newton’s THIRD Matrix
Morphology REASONING — all physics explanation : no exception:
Upper. The onset 1 of any v Blocking a front rotational velocity w 2 will inevitably result in an equal onset of a reduced
centrifugation 3 — on an equally tendency
to preserve the state through a balancing centripetation 4. The net ACTION would be a tendency to reduce centrifugation on a
slightly inwardly veered end vector direction — hence creating the onset for a
new, different and displaced, centrifugation point [The C0 deflected Coriolis
point ¦ CoriolisResolution ¦ PerihelionPrecessionRotationCenter].
Local Gdominance. Lower.
Accelerating temperature pressure from a light build up pushes radially on the
planet’s local gravitationally dominant light-sphere [Michelson and Morley
experiments from 1881, Bradley’s discovery of Aberration 1725].
Also the planet’s rotational velocity [w] meets this accelerating thermal light
pressure. Possibly on an even larger magnitude, as suggested by the two figures
vector morphology. The numbers 1 2 3 4 relate to the same order of discussion TheMAL
as on the causal details in the basic deduction of centrifugation [ Physics
First ¦ KeplerMomentumBASICS ¦ Application
1] and its connection to
Coriolis’ first theorem. All with credit on Newton’s three
basic laws.
• A Centrifugal push 1 results in an opposed Newton’s Third preserving centripetal
contraction 2 which inevitably
corresponds to a higher degree of rotational velocity 3, sensed instrumentally [ the ball in the thread hanging from the roof: Understanding
Action Reaction ] as the end reactive [instrumental measuring] force 4.
IncreasingTemperaturePressure:
INCREASING TEMPERATURE PRESSURE — ThePush
IN A BUILD UP LIGHT FIELD IT apparently
PUSHES ON THE PLANETS INDIVIDUAL LOCAL GRAVITATIONAL DOMINANCE until
thermodynamical equilibrium is reached
Following the Newton’s
Three laws by their causal action-reaction consequences (Newton’s
Third in explicit) leads to
the same end station picture (TheMAL) as that related by and
from Coriolis first theorem.
• BOTH onsets along the central vector line
Sun-Planet — a linear translational centrifugal push or tug — and the
rotational planetary move, CAN SO BE RELATED AS TO fetch the same vector end
resulting directions, however on different magnitudes.
As there is no KINETIC
interaction between light and mass (SolarEclipses ¦ Multiple c ¦ Two Arguments) — only interactions between their light’s gravitational
dependency regions and domains — which are carried along with their host
masses’ local gravitational dominance — these light accelerations build-ups DO
NOT AFFECT THE ORDINARY KEPLER area momentum mechanics BECAUSE THERE ARE NO
OBSCURING MOTIONAL BLOCKING MASSES IN AN EMPTY LIGHT FIELD SPACE.
(We must differentiate
between the actual mass, kinetics, the planet, and its (rPdMATH) local
g-dominant light carrying
gravitational dominance: light physics. These were definitely never related
[so] in modern corridors — do correct if faulty).
The net end effect
apparently creates (All Kepler Math) a new rotational reference center PerihelionPrecessionRotationCenter, bringing the actual preserved Kepler momentum (Anomalistic) orbit with it — still
undisturbed.
In a perfect
thermodynamic equilibrium light field, there is no longer a CHANGE to relate
any affection on the masses’ local gravitationally dominant light spheres (Local Gdominance).
So: With the present
academic idea of physics (and mathematics):
• No way.
— No way the student
would have even the slightest chance to deduce even the most elementary (the
atomic nucleus: h = mcr) in the complex as such. But please: Do correct if that
statement would be incorrect. That would be encouraging (Student’s 6 points of
five possible).
SaturatedLightField: IncreasingTemperaturePressure
The kinetic energy E=mv2/2 associated with the extra perihelion rotation AS ADDED to the
ordinary Kepler Anomalistic planet’s (kinetic energy) orbit around the Sun, seems not directly negligible.
A SATURATED BUILD UP LIGHT FIELD ENDS THE CELESTIAL
PRECESSION ENERGY BUILD UP STORY
At
least, that is what related physics seems to demand, if nothing else
KineticPrecession ¦ CoriolisResolution ¦ Formally Kepler Math
E = (mPLANET/2)([u/v0]vPLANET)²
The
orbital precession presents a small extra added [sidereal time] rotational
energy. It must have had its own unique historical explanation — as it
apparently didn’t destroy the Kepler anomalistic
property [The
RESULT]: no kinetic interaction
or affection.
At least some 2-5 T18 Joule of energy input for Mercury, Venus, Earth and Jupiter is needed to realize the precessions. HOW DID THAT EXTRA ENERGY SURGE COME ABOUT
— included apparently (Two Arguments) without disturbing the (modern academy »planetesimals» impacting »random by chance») ordinary Kepler orbit, not the slightest?
That
apparently did advance to be A The 10 billion question issue.
MODERN ACADEMY deals with
”space-curve-time” concepts
in launching the
explaining mathematics (All Kepler MATH).
The Celestial History
Behind is apparently living in the dark
— blocking the student
from understanding basic cosmology.
TheExplanation: SaturatedLightField
THE EXPLANATION
RELATED PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS has suggested
the following Test EXPLANATION
Every material body has its own individual gravitational field.
Between a Planet and the Sun there is a (local acceleration constant a=Gm2/d2) balancing point where a put mass will fall to neither party. A table in Local Gdominance shows how far that point is from each of the planet’s center on the Sun’s near side measured in planetary equatorial radii units (rPd/rP).
rPdMATH: TheExplanation ¦ rPd
———————————————
Related Physics Universe History ¦
Local G dominance — rPd-math ¦ Thermal-LIGHT PRESSURE DETAILS
No initial
light field from the Sun before the planetary revolutions (the conservation of angular
momentum: mK = mvr as in Planck constant: h=mcr). Before any
light comes about, related physics says, is established Kepler orbital periods
— with zero perihelion precessional phenomena. See the perihelion precession
explaining substitution of the cr-factors in All Kepler Math,
and how these connect to light physics’ temperature pressure details. The
precession part comes with the light, related physics All KeplerMath suggests.
It apparently, in to the last atom, is All Kepler Math — connecting the Suns4 deduced heat degrees: thermal pressure explains the original dynamics.
However and apparently never observed in modern corridors.
In TNED related physics and mathematics (The Solar Systems in Milky Way ¦ Earth’s Third Equation)
ESPECIALLY ON THE PERIHELION
PRECESSION MATHEMATICS CREDIT as it has shown
our (highly mathematically ordered by specified time windows) Solar system planetary order necessarily establishes the planetary orbits (some 5 years) before the Sun has begun its thermonuclear reaction history.
• No initial sunlight, given the planetary orbits. KEPLER BASICS preserved.
Angular momentum preservation basics (mK = mvr) connects the Kepler Area Momentum mathematics (Kepler’s three laws). And these — apparently — work kinetically mechanically independent of the extra (The RESULT) perihelion precessions phenomena: no kinetic-mechanic interference with perihelion precessions.
• A planet meets no motional resistance as it rotates around the Sun in a mass free empty space. No way.
As light physics propagation does not connect kinetics (Solar Eclipses ¦ Multiple c ¦ Two Arguments) neither LIGHT — THERMODYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM — presents any mass velocity resistance factor:
• LIGHT AS SUCH — in a thermodynamic equilibrium — cannot push on matter. But as matter is temperature dependent, CHANGES IN LIGHT/temperature can — and do — affect moving masses (dynamic temperature pressure). One simple example is material length elongation phenomena: heat lengthens a metal stick (material atoms vibrate with greater average distances), and cooling shortens it (early school experiment around 10).
TwienAffection: rPdMATH
———————————————
Thermal-LIGHT PRESSURE DETAILS ¦
Explaining CoriolisPrecession
THAT thermal —
light — pressure or wave energy HAS effect on mass and
matter (also the Photoelectric effect) is well known from the Earth’s upper
atmosphere. Sunlight’s exciting electron push on the atoms maintains a HESC-process in Earth’s top atmosphere.
That is: A hydrogen escape in Earth’s top atmosphere is maintained by Sun’s
energy exciting electron push on 50-100 KM high atmospheric water molecules.
The result is a cyclic maintained Ozone Shield production. The Tg Tw and Tp values are calculated from
Suns4 on 1AU =
Earth’s mean distance from Sun. And, as we see, there are possible connections
on the deduced heat degrees — however not mentioned in any most visual form in
modern corridors (yet).
— The actually lower value (16 549.5
°K) at 50-100 KM altitude from the more free space’s (40 Earth radii far out) 21 657 °K can
possibly be attributed to the successive damping effect as sunlight
successively (Compton effect) enters into
Earth’s locally gravitationally dominant atmosphere.
From the first historical universal moment our Sun ignites, it begins the build-up of its light field, related physics says. Its LIGHT DIVERGENCE (speed of light in free space: Divergence Convergence ¦ Grip Deep) also follows the deduced Light’s Gravitational Dependency (LGD).
• The light field increases in intensity (temperature pressure acceleration build up) as the Sun starts up for the first time: energy input increases.
• IN A PERFECTLY THERMODYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM only:
As in the already (temperature pressure) TNED related and deduced light physics basics,
• a perfect exact ideal mathematical physical explainable balance exists between g-pressure (convergence) and T-pressure (divergence)
— That is: where no change any longer exists. That is, to clarify beyond doubt:
• when a certain STATE already has been established:
• a saturated, no longer building up (or fading) light field in this case.
In our case meaning, apparently — on the CHANGE issue: without a preponderant acceleration, no force, no energy can work:
• ONLY WHEN the Sun for the first time in the history of our universe is building up its light field
— the T-pressure RADIATIVE TEMPERATURE INCREASE form exposes acceleration
— it inevitably will also PUSH on the planet’s local light’s gravitationally dependent acceleration force field balancing point (Local Gdominance):
NOT kinetically mechanically
DIRECTLY ON THE PLANETARY mass as from a sudden mechanical impact — but
rather on the (relatively vast) space between its coherently connected atoms THROUGH
THE PLANET’S LOCALLY DOMINANT g-field.
The planet’s local gravitational connection to the local gravitationally dominant central mass feels a centrifugal attack. AND THAT BATTLE WILL NEVER HAPPEN — Kepler orbits preserved
(because light does not connect kinetics).
So, related physics continues:
WHEN The Sun’s building up light field pushes on the already gravitational mechanical Keplerian established orbital physics — IT apparently PERSISTS IN still going strong these days too. And hence apparently persists in being equally preserved: (SIDEREALLY VIEWED — time with respect to the distant stars: Kepler revolution plus a small extra perihelion precession addition — it means that the precessive WORK (The Sun) brings the Kepler status with it — without interfering with the Kepler anomalistic status).
• No change. Not the slightest itty bitty tiny. No way.
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE?
Mechanics — gravitation — works AS IF masses are connected through mass POINTS acting INDEPENDENT OF TIME (Grip DEEP) — TIMELESS STATE — which basic natural principle modern academy refuses to accept (”nothing travels faster then c”).
Gravitation is equal to all matter, cannot be shielded from: hence independent of time
LIGHT is different to all matter, CAN be shielded from, and hence: time dependent
• Related physics (The Atomic Nucleus h=mcr: conservation of c0 independent of gravitation).
LIGHT PHYSICS on the other hand NEEDS TIME to connect a contact.
— a property which mechanics, gravitation, TIMELESS STATE, has NOT.
— These cannot in no mother god loving way ever interfere on their basic nature, mingle, mix or engage. But (Basic Math Ranks) modern academy 1800+ gave strong effort in meriting inventions for »a unitive theory» (and still is) in which these both (now) show: »slave properties» to the modern academic way. Say: it does not get through.
Action and Reaction
AS the g-field light heat temperature increasing propagating accelerated attack on the planet’s individual gravitational property local dominant sphere transfers to the planet’s g-center, it apparently experience a not kinetic mechanic caused CENTRIFUGAL push on the out — kinetics intact.
CoriolisResolution:
TheExplanation
¦ rPdMATH ¦ The v/c Relation ¦ POINT
AND THAT LEADS US DIRECTLY AND INEVITABLY TO
CORIOLIS’ FIRST THEOREM
»elasticity between central solid state mass and
surrounding local gravitational dominance»
But THAT the details here in arguments modern academy quarters have no reasonable WAY to interpret as valid. Because: Other established inducements have already prioritized a now well 100 year old academic history banning of these simple elementary elegant 1600 basic concepts; Action and reaction; Cause and effect, choices and their causal consequences — based on already given laws of nature: gravitation, electricity: LIFE. HumanRight.
Presented news:
• DECISION OUTSIDE
EXPLICIT HumanRight RECOGNITION has
only power to destroy.
No exceptions. 24/7. Nature Law.
• But these
governmental aces DO believe it is A HUMAN CREATION — a Charity Gesture to the
Poor tagged cattle, from the Rich real A-humans: The Master Race — persistently
denying any such claimed property — of Governing Inducements. Say agin.
DRIFT.
Not plan. There was never any such proclamation or intention.
———————————————
Coriolis’ First Theorem ¦ TheMAL ¦ PerihelionPrecessionRotationalCenter ¦ Thermo
ElGraDis
The accelerated °K T-push from Sun’s first build up light field on the local planetary g-dominant light sphere apparently ACTS as related forces WITH a Coriolis effect on a veering (vector resultant direction) maneuver — a little by little dv/dt (CausalNewton) — AS the Sun’s light field builds up on the T-accelerating intensities. There is, apparently, the Kepler momentum preserved, NEVER a kinetic mechanic push. No way.
Then the deduced mathematics — all Kepler math — explains the rest of it — apparently including modern attempts.
A Coriolis (light field) effect — on a primary
planetary solar system start up
Summing end — All Kepler Mathematics
Without an accelerating T-pressure agency — Sun’s first light — the precessional DYNAMICAL explanation apparently has no physical RATIONAL LOGIC reference at all to rely on. It IS a Coriolis (light field) effect — on a primary planetary solar system start up. That is also exactly the TNED principal principle deductions (LGD), fitting the hand as the glove. Perfect Assembly.
WHEN this light field build up is saturated, no more accelerative pushing physical phenomena exists to relate a change of state: full precessional pace reached.
During the rest of the history, changes in the light field has the described capacity of making adjustments, give or take. The fact that the Kepler Math holds, still, is just only another confirmation of TNED basic star physics deductions unless there is some hidden strong argumentation we have missed, please share: Sun’s constant photometric effect (IAU testing DETAILS) guaranteeing a stable planetary, precessive, consolidation.
AgainInConclusion: 20Dec2022 — CoriolisResolution
The
First Sun Light Energy Build Up Argument explaining how planetary perihelion
precessions came about at all
AGAIN IN CONCLUSION
• 1. Planets meet no Kepler momentum motional (Kepler Anomalistic Period) resistance
because in a
mass free
thermodynamical equilibrium
saturated empty space
nothing is there to stop a
free mass motion once it has started
———————————————
• 2. The perihelion precession phenomena apparently explains a separately small added rotation with zero — none — interacting interference or affecting impact upon the ordinary Kepler momentum revolution.
———————————————
• 3. As this remarkably celestial no mutual interacting interference history apparently has no present dynamical sustaining energy source, it apparently is explained as a no space obscuring remnant from a pimary ENERGY FEED — which apparently DID do the perihelion precession set up dynamics. Basic Solar system Birth. See PrecessionEnergy.
———————————————
• 4. The explaining mathematical physics in All Kepler Math
then, apparently, gives the full explaining picture in how to relate, explain and understand the celestial perihelion precession dynamically relatable details phenomena.
All
Kepler Math ¦ KeplerMomentumBasics
Without
acquaintance with the TNED/Planck constant and Stefan-Boltzmann based deduced
pressure-gravitational-thermo-nuclear temperature details (Suns4) every single attempt to explain the planetary perihelion precession
phenomena IN
ITS FULL MECHANICS was certainly doomed to a
successful fundamental failure. No matter the excellently explaining
mathematics — guiding us through still unknown territories, connecting to us
yet unknown physics — we stood there as more or less desert dry buckets —
unable to get even one single drop of The Rain out.
———————————————
All Kepler Math ¦ ThePerihelionPrecessions ¦ PrecessionEnergy ¦ Pressure Min
Max ¦ The
RESULT ¦ TheExplanation ¦ PerihelionPrecessionRotationalCenter
• 5. The explanation
apparently contains and entails perfectly unfamiliar details to modern academic
thinking as it apparently
— by DRIFT, not plan: the consequences of ignoring basic natural brain logics, and instead relying on Academic Consensus
— has invented blocking concepts that prevents a natural associative recognition of A Path for deducing the nature of the phenomena, as related.
Please do disclaim, anyone who can: search for. None yet found.
Say again:
— There is nothing wrong with The intelligence. No way. Only Problem is: showing a minimum interest of Its innate NATURAL content. THAT modern academic teaching system 1800+ APPARENTLY (Nature) Did miss — completely, fundamentally, deeply, cosmically, truly. Say again.
See also further mathematical equivalents in
Formally Kepler MATH and Physics First.
FinalWord:
Compare some HiTech
Swedish KnowHow on The Highest Possible Cosmological Outlook — Swedish Radio,
weekly program Knowledge’s World 25Mar1988:
(Fascistic Ideation — no HumanRight mentioning) — by DRIFT. Not plan:
”Människan har skapat
matematiken, därom är alla lärde överens”,
Sveriges Radio Vetandets Värld 25 mars 1988:
translated:
Man
has created mathematics, thereof are in agreement all the educated.
EDUCATION (Physics
First) in humanity is
apparently on the Up.
What a joy is it not in sharing such an excellent level of Creation:
• Consensus is not now, newer was, and never
will be a scientific subject.
• SPECULATION has no scientific foundation.
• DECISION, education — outside HumanRight recognition — has only power to destroy.
That is the reason this
author never was invited. Thank you very much.
Mathematics (Mathematics’ 5 fundamentals ¦ never seen in any Swedish or other educational literature) is
apparently a lead. IT develops and educates humanity: we
discover explaining connections. Not the other way
around. But in modern corridors there appears to be a general difficulty in
seeing the difference between what nature has served to us from birth, and the
less smart inducements we might have on the origin of those properties. (You
know .. percieving some difference between left and right .. ).
PrecessionEnergy: — FirstLightTable ¦ Local Gdominance ¦ CoriolisResolution
THE PRECESSION ENERGY — from what celestial
history?
THE SATURATED STAR-PLANETARY LIGHT FIELD
— UP TO THERMODYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM (FirstLIGHTtable)
As
observed — see also The RESULT
in comparing end calculated-measured precession values.
SolenT2022.ods T2 C22 ¦ T3
A4, H4 ¦ BA1978 — rAU mPlanet rPlanet ¦ t v See Kepler Anomalistic via determined G and mS.
See these [accurate] values in comparison with
modern academic calculated in The
RESULT.
Table values
explaining the calculated actual kinetic precessional energy E = mv²/2 with
m=mPlanet i mJ=Earth mass units 5.975 T24 KG and
vPrecession =
vPlanet · (u/v0 = the actual precession per ordinary Kepler anomalistic planetary revolution
period).
UH TABLE SOURCE: SolenT2022.ods T3
Energy H4 —— GRAPHS:
Energy [Joule] : integral
Power [Effect, Watt] : derivative
The graphs and
table values expose the necessary first build up light energy procedure in a
related explanation to the planetary perihelion precession mathematical physics
— see All Kepler Math.
— The illustrated graphs are of the Effect-Energy
principle mathematical form, not (what we know) the precise actual.
Energy
ARGUMENTAL POINTS:
• 1. The planet’s Kepler area momentum STILL COUNTS NOW (The RESULT):
• 2. Apparently proving: the extra precessional rotation does not interfere with (1).
• 3. Apparently proving: the continuing Kepler planetary revolutions around Sun as well as the very small but provable precessional added rotation meets not motional resistance. They hold NOW, too, as well as »earlier».
• 4. Apparently proving: the kinetic energy (PrecessionEnergy) behind the small extra precessional planetary revolutions around the Sun apparently WAS generated in some past history of our Solar system development, as the function continues to exist NOW without meeting any (significant) motional resistance.
• 5. Apparently proving: Only a primary (short) history of THERMAL HEAT PRESSURE ACCELERATION (Precession Energy) lies on our table for explaining the bare existence of a precession phenomena — on a still, before that, already established Kepler planetary rotation. So: (The Solar Systems in Milky Way)
— FIRST basic MASS ejections — on a given angular momentum, giving the ejected masses their Kepler properties:
(That confirms the TNED deduced K-cell physics by
principle — without any such mentioning).
— THEN Sunlight — after a first Sun mass preparation for building up its energy machine (5 years in TNED).
(That certifies the energy aspect explanation).
Dodge that one, anyone who can.
(It apparently explains, and
certifies, the whole cosmological picture — in to the last atom).
(— We dit Not foresee than one
coming the perihelion precession phenomena collecting »everything».
Thank you very much).
After Sun’s first build up process, a state of thermal equilibrium enters (present Sun’s photometric effect — as related and experimentally conformed in The IAU-test): no further additional precessive energy input.
The end picture connects to the mathematical definitions (All Kepler Math) — and the corresponding instrumental measures for comparison (TheRESULT).
Further relating, comparing and explaining details, see APPLICATION4, The RESULT and Case Closed.
POINT: FirstLIGHTtable ¦ The Dynamic ¦ ThePerihelionPrecessions ¦ Case
Closed
EXPOSING THE ENTIRE
COSMOLOGICAL SCENE
ENERGY TO BUILD UP A PLANETARY PERIHELION
PRECESSION: FROM WHERE? Please share.
From TWO ARGUMENTS ¦ ThePROOF
THERMAL PRESSURE
MATHEMATICS DETAILS IN CASE CLOSED.
Successively increasing —
accelerating — temperature pressure is apparently the only reasonable causing
relational agent
THERMO-NUCLEAR
RADIATION PRESSURE — Suns4
— Explaining CoriolisPrecession
The theory in this part
has no (here) known representation in modern corridors — although elementary
and simple
The
Point — not included in modern academic physics, as above:
Up to
Thermodynamic Equilibrium — TIME is apparently needed to reach this All Kepler Math condition from first SunLightONbegin:
•
There is, what we know, no physical dynamical reasonable statistical
PROBABILITY that IT is »pushed by bombarding planetesimals» (Two
Arguments):
• The
ordinary Kepler anomalistic planetary orbit is — apparently — PRESERVED independent
of the extra perihelion precession: the latter must apparently be established
IN SEPARATE over time through Sun’s established thermal light field — with zero
affection on the Kepler rotation (All Kepler Math).
That excludes directly the modern academic
idea of HOW — »by chance and random» — the Solar system did
come about, at all.
• APPARENTLY Only through a successive
(pushing, expanding) a = dv/dt process in the Sun’s light field affection on a planet, its orbital
perihelion precession quantity can arrive
— IF we are talking
RATIONAL APPREHENSIVE PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS.
THERMAL PRESSURE
MATHEMATICS DETAILS IN CASE CLOSED.
THEvDcRelation: — detailing the
function ¦ ThePerihelionPrecessions
15Dec2022
THE v/c RELATION — BRADLEY’S ABERRATION 1725
EXPLAINING THE DYNAMICS BEHIND THE ANSWER TO HOW THE RELATION BRINGS THE KEPLER MOMENTUM WITH IT
Introducing the c factor in All Kepler Math (cr and v/c) — time dependence: the nature of light (Grip DEEP) — certifies a BREACH with any time independent central force action mK connection in the complex (KeplerMomentumBasics). To preserve mK, a cause-effect complex apparently must bring it with it.
• The Potential Barrier is the only here known explanining principle behind the answer to how the (cr and v/c) perihelion precession dynamics do affect the planetary mass atomic masses bringing them with the extra precessional addition — without affecting the planetary Kepler Sun-Planet relation gravitational property, as observed.
———————————————
Kepler area momentum (K=vr)
THE ONLY WAY for a mass (m) to preserve the Kepler area momentum principle (K=vr=2A/t) is if — and only if, and nothing else but if — the m-trajectory path is governed by an impulse (impetus mv, linear momentum’s differential) exactly timeless-propagative — no curve elongating involved physics — directed along (d), between m and a corresponding central force action center (P, Sw., ortspunkt, »ActPoint» [sometimes English is just horrible .. the corresponding term has been searched for but not found .. »Homey» ..]) — with no force coupling time delay..
That is:
• mK is preserved ONLY if changes to m in speed and direction is executed along the time-independent-continuous unbroken connection the force action vector (Sw., ortsvektorn [»ActVector»]) between m-P: Meaning:
• ANY no connecting TIME delay along (d) the force vector line P-m will spoil and destroy mK — angular momentum (J=mvr=Kvr) preservation.
Newtons3inShort: The v/c
Relation — Newton’s 3:
Newton’s 3 (Principia 1687)
•
UNLESS CHANGED a STATE
prevails indefinitely.
• IF
changed, the change is proportional to the changing force [F=ma].
• A
TENDENCY to change a given STATE always with zero exception corresponds to a
TENDENCY to preserve the given STATE.
That
apparently is the general inertial law of physics: resistance
against change: mass: Gravitation: induction — and magnetism — in explicit [TheCausalConnection].
These — hence — apply to any physics situation: any type of change in any type of state.
Modern academy
cannot take a discussion on this level. Why? See LGD.
Because modern academy was apparently never
interested to developed that side of
its natural brains: deducing The
Neutron AS the Planck constant h = mcr.
— Nothing is wrong with the Intelligence. No way.
Problem: using its innate nature.
———————————————
DivisionDerivative ¦ CausalNewton ¦ THE POTENTIAL BARRIER ¦ Physics’ 7th principle ¦
Where Q is taken. The Energy Zone. Fundamental nuclear physics (LGD).
However not apparently present or even noticed in
modern corridors, I’m afraid:
— A deduction of the electric charge — Q — never existed in modern academy:
• LGD. It
is such a joy to share Earth with modern ideas
— always fresh on oxygen.
»PA
basics» not known in modern quarters: See Physics’ 7th Principle: mass has no smallest particle
m = (n→∞) · m/(n→∞) =
m : principle principal endless division on
the gravitation principle: mathematics:
E = hf = mc² demands a No Smallest Particle SO THAT mass
CAN be destroyed — mass structure completely annihilated — INTO Light and
Heat [COEI conservation of
energy by induction]: LIFE.
The Sun. The
Stars. Say again. Do disclaim that, the one who can. We will surrender
immediately: A 100% perfect mathematical relatable explanation with zero
question marks — or not at all.
EXPLAINING THE DYNAMICS BEHIND THE ANSWER TO HOW THE
v/c RELATION BRINGS THE KEPLER MOMENTUM WITH IT
Starlight build up brings Kepler properties with it
— with intact Kepler properties preserved
IN THIS SPECIFIC CASE — compare
the values on The
Precessional Rotational Center as different from the ideal
Sun g-center:
max 707 mM, min 0.3 mM for
Mercury [ the CoriolisResolution ]: the
light build up Precession energy pretty much
adds »MotherSolarPlanetary rotation»:
Planetary Kepler Momentum ON STAR
LIGHT BUILD UP adds »KeplerMomentumSpinn» to the Star:
— Light build up energy TAKES on
the planet — which local gravitational dominance affects — brings it with it —
the Sun’s ditto, thereby adding Solar-Planet Spin: perihelion precession.
TNED related PHYSICS:
Relating (CausalNewton
¦ Newtons3)
an
accelerating light field’s interaction with the local gravitational dominance
from a local mass on its local light’s gravitational dependency —
however not so concluded or apprehended or interpreted in modern corridors —
see comparing results in LGD —
is performed — related - as follows
ON THE PERIHELION PRECESSION PHENOMENA (related physics says: do disclaim if possible: save no energy on trying to do so, ever):
The TNED deduced Neutron h=mcr PlanckRing ¦ PlanckFractalStructure certifies that all fusions build heavier nuclei from the deepest lying n-p fractal ±e structures, exposing the highest possible hf-fractal frequencies — hf = (h/n)(nf ): the fractal level energy decreases with the h/n-fractal structure — thereby certifying that heavier nuclei will not be disintegrated on the higher fractal hf-energy credits. Because these fractal n-p structures consist of ±e (fractal) spinning rings (see Pair Annihilation) — as explained in the PlanckRing fractal mathematics — all nuclei and their electron mass constituents (The TAU Ring: see SPECTRUM AND QUANTUM NUMBERS ¦ THE ELECTRON ¦ THE ELECTRON’S BUBBLE CHAMBER TRACES, unless already familiar) are continuously exposed to correspondingly thermo nuclear energy outlets from any nearby fusion reactions (stars, our Sun).
The thermo nuclear radiation from star energy production so affects all matter — all atoms and their electron masses — thermo nuclear radiation pressure, T-gamma as deduced due to their shared principle ±e basic n-p surface (fractal) structure. That is: The General Planck Ring h=mcr with its fractal nature (Physics 7th).
The Potential Barrier defines WHERE the nuclear (inductive) radiation TAKES on a charged mass (PlanckRing ±e Fractal). That is, HOW (and where) an atomic nucleus and its electron mass constituents are affected by nuclear radiation or any general electric and magnetic feature (See also NEUTRINO SPECTRUM). Namely in the so (LGD) deduced Energy Zone (cz = c0/2). Meaning: just precisely outside THE NUCLEI SURFACE: — The Planck Ring's hard gravitational fractally (Physics 7th) spinning toroid hollow surface. See also The Atomic Nucleus Gravitational Deduction (The PlanckRing2).
Therefore, in any first building up of a (TNED deduced and related: STAR PHYSICS PART 1) star's light field from its inner thermo nuclear radiative activity, all surrounding matter will inevitably be affected by a corresponding nuclear radiation pressure (T-gamma ¦ T-wien ¦ TWienAffection) — until saturated. That is the end TNED explanation behind the extra perihelion precession energy, having certified that the mechanic, kinetic, Kepler momentum orbit property — Sun-Planet gravitational relation only — remains undisturbed and unaffected (see comparing end values in The RESULT): All Kepler Math.
With the established planet's local gravitational dominance, light passes between the different masses (stars, planets) according to the James Bradley 1725 discovered Aberration effect. Apparent star positions perpendicular to Earth's velocity direction around the Sun hides an elongated (c-delayed ¦ Light Generatrix) path to the actual star, depending on the relation v/c = TanA° where v is Earth's velocity (relative the star in sight).
———————————————
FirstLIGHT: PotentialBarrier ¦ FirstLIGHTtable
¦ The4P
When Sunlight
first appears, it necessarily follows — the illustrated energy-effect function below,
left — an accelerating temperature and light intensity process up to a
saturated maximum. A Sun orbiting mass — its own individual local gravitational
dominance (Super Position Principle) — will inevitably meet this accelerating light energy push in two
basic ways. The first (translation) is through the direct ideal spherical
divergence, radially out from the Sun. The second (rotation) is through the
motion of the mass in its radially transverse rotational direction.
———————————————
CausalNewton ¦ PotentialBarrier
We can relate
the physical action-interaction details in this complex situation as suggested
in the illustration, using The Causal Newton method: Newton’s three basic laws do explain any physical phenomena. IF
that would be an erroneous statement, don’t forget to tell (it will never happen). The order is of the same magnitude as that already given in the CausalNewton
illustration — the related order of action-reaction on the 1 2 3 4 detailed
directional vector coordination
points.
— The only difference to ordinary KINETIC direct
impact physics to observe in this light field local dominant mass g-sphere
interaction, is the already underlined: The planetary orbital Kepler anomalistic area momentum
mathematical physics is never affected by the separate resulting precessive
phenomena — BECAUSE APPARENTLY the present planetary order HAS a preserved —
precise calculable with corresponding comparing measured perihelion
precession values — Kepler area momentum preserved (Two
Arguments): IT NEVER TOOK ANY CHANGE. Never affected.
In a normal (not light involved) mechanical kinetical situation — direct massive impact, changing the masses positions outside a regular (gravitational) central force action — a corresponding Kepler area destructive momentum effect in the orbit would be expected to appear (type direct contact pushes from other bodies). But as related: Light’s physics have not that property (as related — but apparently unknown i modern corridors). Only by the fact that STILL a Kepler area momentum (K=vr) is present in the planetary system — on which calculated base also, then, a correspondingly precise calculation of perihelion precessions is possible (All Kepler Math ¦ The RESULT) — the proof is confirmed.
See also on CoriolisRESOLUTION.
THEvDcRelation ¦ PotentialBarrier
UnderstadingActionReaction:
Newtons3
THE SIMPLE WAY AND METHOD TO DO IT:
— What we know: all living creatures (not only dead matter) has IT inside their individual MIND: sensing a CHANGE. If we remember the simple »hung ball from roof» principle, there is no, what we know, known problem in physics that cannot be solved by consulting a corresponding experiment in deciding what counts and what not.
A hung mass in a thread from a roof in whatever physical mass system. (There you go).
— With a detailed instrumental readout:
• Any corresponding external physical history can be written from within that mass room only by appropriate knowledge of the different thread positions during the different times — as The Bird determines its action & reaction on the fly.
• Equilibrium — STATE apprehension — dictates the action and reaction properties. There are no exceptions.
It IS and always has been A Question of Balance.
KeplerMomentumBasics: All
Kepler Math ¦ ThePerihelionPrecessions ¦ THEvDcRelation
16Dec2022
SolenT2022.ods T2 A60 — LightTIME
Time in minutes
for light with radial propagation velocity c0 = 2.99792458 T8 M/S to travel
from Sun to Planet. Only by that time dependency, any mechanical connection (Grip Deep) between light physics and planetary Kepler
kinetics is out of the question:
• The planetary perihelion precession
phenomena does not interact: light does not connect kinetics.
But in modern corridors these simple basics have
become Hieroglyphs — because ”nothing travels faster than c”. See also in ModernAcademyMultiplec.
• The planetary Kepler momentum as such is
force-executively time-independent (Grip DEEP): gravitational force propagates
timeless (The Solar Eclipses).
— See also in Two Arguments. Full mathematical
exposure in All Kepler Math.
Grip Deep: LIGHT PHYSICS ON THE CELESTIAL LEVEL HAS NO POSSIBLE WAY
FOR CONNECTING KEPLER MOMENTUM PHYSICS.
———————————————————————————————
Apparently never (really) clarified in Modern Corridors — the short version:
From a MacroCosmos to a
MicroCosmos:
K = 2A/t
BEHIND THE CURTAINS OF — the planetary perihelion precession phenomena
K = vr — relating the atomic detaild classical physics behind the planetary perihelion precession phenomena (Grip Deep ¦ All Kepler Math)
KeplerMOMENT — CENTRAL FORCE ACTION BASICS
KEPLER MOMENTUM BASICS — (The Kepler) law of surface quantity conservation
The WHY AND HOW a perihelion
precession
(EnergySource: The4P —
SunTemperatureFieldUpstart: LightFields) does not govern gravitation
physics, only preserves it. Compare The Solar
Eclipses
GeDith: KeplerBasics
Geometry’s Displacement Theorem:
EQUAL AREAS ON EQUAL TIMES
Sw. »geometrins förskjutningssats»
With t
for time: The connecting line (d) between a fix point (P, the ActPoint)
and a body (B) moving straight along L with a constant velocity (v)
shows that
• d covers equal areas on equal times
— geometry’s simple displacement theorem in related physics
IF the
propagated covered path (s) is divided in equal intervals (b),
all triangles b.P share one and the same area:
• A = bh/2.
From 2A = bh
then is given K = 2A/t = bh/t which is the area momentum or
(here) Kepler Momentum, or
• The KeplerMoment.
As long as change on m in speed and direction is accomplished along d WITH NO SHORTEST POSSIBLE CONNECTING TIME DELAYING INTERFERENCE — straight ActLine P.m conserved — the m-path can have any imaginable form related to — relative — its ActPoint P.
Velocity v
in an arbitrary orbit point (B) can be divided in the angular components h(=vnormal)
and H(=v0) along the ActVector (d). For every B accounts then
according to (GeDith) the displacement theorem and
relations through right angled triangles
• bd = h/v ; bv = hd
The component H along d has been named centripetal acceleration (into P) and centrifugal acceleration (out from P). The central decisive point:
• If H is changed to H’, which depicts v as v’,
the resulting vector form (v’) is GUARANTEED preserved inside the given
interval h CERTIFYING that the area H’h
through GeDith
is a CONSTANT.
• A given h »the
momentary apparently absolute action roof» @ any moment of time — dt0
— can in no way be changed except AFTER a NEXT COMING shortest possible
time interval — executed by any whatever H-change
along d (Example).
APPLICATIONS: A1 A2 A3 A4 —— Application1: GeDith
RELATED PHYSICS based on Kepler-Galilei-Newton results ¦ KEPLER MOMENTUM BASICS
FIRST APPLICATION — Central Acceleration å=w²/r
The following type of elementary deduction of basic concepts in physics, geometry and mathematics has no here known established representation. Al least not among the foremost viewed. However, this presentation does not cover all material. So, there might be some, somewhere. That would be encouraging.
———————————————
CausalNewton ¦ Central Action ¦ Coriolis’ first Theorem
The Acting Acceleration from ActPoint O (Origo) to moving mass point P along O.P
— or the central acceleration meaning: the orbital moving P changes relative the fix ActPoint (O)
— acquires its exact synthesis from the KeplerMoment through its similarity with the linear acceleration (Galileo Galilei’s experiments with bronze-balls in a leaning run — The Birth of Mechanics 1636 ¦ Galileo Galilei, 1564-1642).
MAC1900+: Applications
In modern quarters 1800+, especially enhanced during the 1900s, with further, it seemed important to derogate these simple basics, instead inventing new, more attractive academic suited criteria on the more popular educational profitable (Nature2022) preferred inducements for natural intelligence (”inertial forces are illusory forces”, »centrifugal force is a pseudo force» .. we need a book to cite them all: established textbooks and literature 1900+ in basic physics and mathematics).
ImageSource: Author’s Archive 12Sep2012 E28
Bild—177
Please: Say,
name, something that 1800+
modern academy did NOT
vandalize in Nature. Just one single example. That would be encouraging. Very.
———————————————
ExperimentalConfirmations ¦ TheNeutronSquareBreakThrough ¦ GripDEEP ¦ UnderstandingActionReaction
• Business
Enterprise — in itself: slavery: QUALITY: no rotten salad —
does not take — does
not understand — knowledge arguments. IT is an ABSTRACT: cookies: MIND
MANIPULATION.
• Business
Enterprise — in itself: slavery: QUALITY: no rotten salad — pisses on HumanRight: knowledge
domain gravitation, electricity: LIFE. Has always done so. Will always do — in
itself.
— Why? Because HumanRight does
not allow slavery. Because HumanRight honors WOMAN — deeply.
• Business
Enterprise — governed by HumanRight RECOGNITION 24/7 — is
the NERVE of all developed human civilizations: market and trade.
Application2: A14
RELATED PHYSICS based on
Kepler-Galilei-Newton results ¦ KEPLER MOMENTUM BASICS
SECOND APPLICATION — GRAVITATION LAW
It is defined mathematically
through the (Kepler area momentum) centrifugal acceleration w2/r
equivalence with the simple Galilean linear acceleration a from the general
Galilean force law F=ma:
From Application 1:
For G (often 6.67 t11 JM/[KG]2 in 1900s encyclopedic/educative literature) see
The Gtest and The Electric Constant.
Application3: A14
RELATED PHYSICS based on
Kepler-Galilei-Newton-Planck results ¦ KEPLER MOMENTUM BASICS
THIRD APPLICATION — Periodic System, Spectrum and Quantum
Numbers
Where in our world is crazy caring tenderness?
Tell me about it ..
With opened eyes: Paradise:
— Get the fuck out of my beach.
SPECTRUM AND QUANTUM NUMBERS h = mcz
l0 ¦ ThePotentialBarrier
Author’s Ref.MPcPeriodic2.wps
Or, as Max
Planck himself put it: the energy packages hf depend not on any property of the light waves themselves, but on
that the atom can emit and absorb
radiation only in definite determined (resonant) hf-quanta (Gamow’s book [sidan 33, Trettio år
som skakade fysiken, Thirty years that shook physics]). Einsteins ”traveling photon” excellently
explains the problem by mathematics (transport syndrome). But —
apparently deeply — blocks its physical natural explanation.
KEPLERMOMENT short repetition
ALL bodies
moving under the influence of a central force follow the KeplerMoment: K=2A/t0=vr. The ActionVectorLine between central mass and orbiting
body always sweeps equal areas during
equal times without exception. The complexity of the orbital form is insignificant.
The Keplermoment multiplied with the orbiting mass gives (Sw., rörelsemängdmomentet,
eller enklare impulsmomentet mv·r) the angular momentum J=mvr:
motional-quantiy-momentum (mv·r): linear moment (mv)
over central-action (r). The periodic
orbit via t0 gives the frequency f =1/t0 and thereby the energy J/t0=E=(mvr)f. IN EXPLICIT: With Planck constant (h) as the universal
efficacy-quantum (Sw., universella verkanskvantumet) — electron
mass angular momentum (see length r=l0 below) — h=mvr,
one arrives at E=hf.
• That directly connects to SPECTRUM AND QUANTUM NUMBERS in atom-
and nuclear physics, and most definitely
• DEDUCING THE PERIOD SYSTEM (based on
simple Kepler area momentum resonances).
The connection
between atomic nucleus and electron element is executed on the electric charge
Q in the deduced potential barrier-zone by
the divergence or the light propagating velocity cz. The potential barrier concept as
such, it (cz)
is, what we know, a concept outside modern academy awareness (LGD) — except as an experimentally observed and
measured quantity: no morphology. In modern quarters (Wikipedia): ”quantum
tunneling”. That concept apparently as so deduced is the entire
electrodynamics foundation in every detail — or not at all. For the nucleus to
connect a resonance with its e-mass, all e-mass’
Q-elements must feedback (electric, magnetic) periodically via cz. A such periodicity can be deduced either
directly on a ground circle (polar resonances) or more generalized on a
surface, corresponding to any possible electron-mass’ extension (surface
resonances, further 3D-resonances).
r need not
aim on a radius vector
— more
detailed in SPECTRUM AND
QUANTUM NUMBERS
The period t0 connects explicitly for electrophysics
a resonance over the length r=l0:
It is, as deduced, a basic energy circle (or direct an energy area A via
the Keplermoment 2A/t0), via the named divergence v=cz : It TAKES on the active charge’s element on
the Site (place, locality) where divergence energy (E=hf) and
gravitational energy are equivalent. Namely where the charge’s potential
maximum resides. That is: »the actual Real Steel physical Q-Take».
More details in LGD with Potential barrier.
Impulse-moment’s
(angular momentum’s mK=mv·r, or »linear momentum’s moment»)
connection over l0 receives hence the general form h=mcz l0=E/f. Then
E=hf=h(f1–f2)=E1–E2 defines
(SPECTRUM) all possible energy fluctuations that the electron mass quantum can
exhibit. And, thereby: all its emitting hf-light.
Conclusion
WE BELIEVED
FROM THE VERY START that modern academy was the instance from which to be
educated on these above suggested basics: great future. After a short but successive test in younger
days, that assumption showed up to be troublesome. We apparently had to look
for another tourist bus.
Application4: A14 — KeplerMomentumBasics
RELATED PHYSICS based on
Kepler-Galilei-Newton-Planck results ¦ KEPLER MOMENTUM BASICS
FOURTH APPLICATION — planetary perihelion precessions
NOW THAT WE
KNOW THAT light physics is in no position of even THINKING on playing with a
Kepler area momentum mechanics
SolenT2022.ods T2 A60 —— KeplerMomentumBasics
— continuous
unbroken vector Timeless acting Direct Now Time Independent force action and
reaction only by the masses resistance against Change —
— everywhere
in the whole universe completely independent of location —
we can also understand the (FirstLightTABLE ¦ FirstLIGHT) reason why — apparently (The RESULT)
— the planetary KeplerMoment is preserved — that IT exists, still today
— INDEPENDENT of the planetary perihelion
precession phenomena (All Kepler Math):
Light physics does not connect kinetics. The
SolarEclipses.
Multiple c. See also MULTIPLE c IN MODERN
ACADEMY.
—
Why not?
—
Because — The SolarEclipses — light is massless: light develops no centrifugation [EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATIONS].
— In modern corridors — where The PotentialBarrier
is just a formless quantity ”quantum tunneling” — the [TNED related COEI, conservation of energy by induction] one does not like the
massless physical property of induction [The Photoelectric effect] — but must
have a traveling OBJECT [Einstein’s Photon] for that happening — WHICH, of
course, also then is given the property of Mass. THEN the concepts began
exercising their own wild affray, looting and sacking whatever the tongue might
reach out for: ACADEMIC consensus determines the menu. Decision. Not recognition: HumanRight
— is a knowledge domain, apparently SO not familiar in modern
quarters:
Gravitation, electricity: LIFE. Brains. Wit. No human state-governmental
A-people invention over B-people. Modern academy mentions it not. Never heard one word OnLine from that
side. IF missed, however, please do correct. That would be a day of joy itself.
24/7. Absolutely.
• The (FirstLIGHTtable)
built up perihelion precession energy — as deduced: from Sun’s first light
building up history (Two Arguments)
— apparently — BRINGS THE ENTIRE KEPLER
MOMENTUM PHYSICS WITH IT without touching even one atom of its base.
We study that.
— Like the Bus
Driver: Driving the passengers between NY and Pittsburgh — without even
THINKING of touching any passenger In Situ.
We (namely)
WOULD (very much) like to know WHERE — by precise explaining quantity — that
kind of MECHANICAL ROTATIONAL Perform-Execute POINT the location of
the point through which the extra rotation is executed is at, as small and
very tiny as the precessional quantity now has proven to be.
ThePrecessiveSTATEargument:
KeplerMomentumBasics
Not
to forget (in this demanding analyze): As deduced and concluded:
ONLY
(FirstLightTable) DURING THE (Precession
energy) temperature-light
ENERGY BUILD UP
is
there a physically relatable causing action for the later established STATE
where
no longer any (changing) input exists to (further) affect the established
precession STATE.
When
that starting period has finished
—
»Sun now works on a constant effect (P=3.8275
T26 W)»
— there is no longer any
supporting or maintaining energy to relate a precessional change:
Modern academy does not seem to have even reflected on this
detail:
• IF a planetary Kepler
momentum exists AS apparently intact today,
• the only possible
physics say that Orbits were established BEFORE First Sun’s light,
• and that THAT light
upstart
• the only available
NOT disturbing Kepler momentum precession energy source,
• gave The precession energy — as is even today;
thermodynamical equilibrium, still.
• Moving bodies in a mass-free empty space in
a (thermo) dynamic equilibrium meets no motional resistance of any kind —
Kepler momentum preserved.
• So, whatever the conditions are NOW, there
is no NOW supporting mechanics than THAT WHICH EXISTED IN THE PAST during the
build up, unless we have missed something imperative.
PerihelionPrecessionRotationalCenter: Application4
• gravitational interaction is linear — absolute, time independent — working on a central vector, while
• light-electricity action is not: it is c-delayed: curved (The Solar Eclipses).
KeplerMomentumBasics ¦ AllKeplerMath
The one
billion dollar Question then apparently is:
C0 —— our presumed precessive deflected
rotational center at test ..
Where?
—
Lies it inside Sun? Outside? If so: How much?
Precisely on
what MECHANICAL reference POINT (C0) IS the Kepler Area
Momentum planetary orbit BROUGHT AROUND to precess BY THE PRECESSIVE rotation: where? Inside Sun? Outside? Oh Please.
• Because IF there is a delocated center from
the ideal K=vr Kepler math — Sun center — IT apparently also
is forced to bring the Sun along with it (It is anyway the Sun which is the
responsible causing agent here, so that part would be no big deal: »mother
takes care of children» stuff).
• Otherwise the specific planetary
Kepler area momentum principle (angular momentum) would not be conserved
— as testified
in The RESULT : it
is.
And besides
that — the ten billion dollar question: HOW do we RELATE that apparently existent point — mechanically?
— The
precessive deviation is apparently small. Yes. But that is no excuse to escape
the Quest.
Directly
mechanically related, we apparently have this situation on the table:
— The
original change of state did leave a NowState which APPARENTLY has a corresponding
Now TIME
INDEPENDENT State as now working
— without any more energy input — mechanical resemblance:
no light physics to relate in explicit : ThePrecessiveSTATEargument
• WHERE in this universe could we find a more
resolving — explaining — picture of The STATE details, and how these relate
inwardly?
• a situation explanation where no change
exists:
.. perhaps it was a hundred billion
question .. or »buy it all» ..
———————————————
CoriolisResolution ¦ AngleE — Deriving
the C0 distance: the two disk displaced centrifugal-center mentioned
[but not deduced] in Coriolis theorems ¦
The (Aberration, James Bradley 1725 first
discovered, but seldom noticed in modern quarters) electric-thermal-light displacement v/c around the planet’s
local gravitational dominant sphere (LocalGdominance), in explicit in Sun’s light field (c) in our precession
complex, revolves a fraction u/v0
= 3(v/c)²
of the planet’s ordinary Kepler anomalistic period (The precession’s simple basic Eddington form). Then — apparently — we have the
u/v0 fractional
revolution as a corresponding Coriolis
First Theorem effect Disc2 agent on the ordinary Kepler planet revolutionary
Disc1.
—
Linear acceleration form: a=2d/t² = C0/t² = nC0/nt² = d0/(t² + t0²)
; C0 = d0t²/(t² + t0²) = d0/(1 +
[t0/t]²) = d0/(1 + [ω/ω0]²) = AU/(1
+ [ωPLANET/ω0precession]²). ω
= 2π/t0:
Disc2:s
center tap is mounted on Disc1.s disc
The TWO DISC
EXAMPLE (COR2) exposes the same (perpetual
principle) situation.
• Disc1 (Sun-Planet rotating vector sweep) has on it a
corresponding ideal tap mounted very slow rotating Disc2 (on which rotation
a gravitational reference point is related to carry the different Coriolis
vector details).
SolenT2022.ods T2 B21 ¦ AY21 —— 1 AU = 1.495 978 7 T11 M
Using the Coriolis effect
deduced CO form (AngleE), the CENTRIFUGAL DISTANCE
deviation from Sun’s center caused by planetary orbital perihelion precession
apparently renders no more than a »ridiculously small»: at most ca 0.3 mM — as
a largest agent for Mercury.
The v/c displacement
around the planet’s locally dominant g-sphere revolves a fraction u/v0 = 3(v/c)² for each the planet’s
Kepler anomalistic period. That directly defines a corresponding Coriolis first
theorem resembling application, the tabled values. The precessional centrifugal
displacement (C0) from the ideal Sun’s gravitational center is, as seen,
»completely negligible». At most for Mercury: 0.369mM = 369µM. International
Standard.
• We apparently could not find a more elegant
resembling mathematical-mechanical explanation than through the Coriolis
complex:
C0
= d0/(1 + [ω/ω0]2) = AU/(1 + [ωPLANET/ω0PRECESSION]2)
———————————————
For all
planetary cases the deflected centrifugal point C0 lies well inside
the Sun. So well that it is questionable to attach any (known) practical
significance to its Sun center difference at all.
Further
details on the precession issue in Case Closed.
See also LARGEST
DEVITATION contrary to the sbove minor result.
CENTbyLightTime: Thermo
ElGraDis
Another
method PerihelionPrecessionRotationalCenter for calculating the Cent point
LARGEST DEVIATION — s-Coloumn
There is also
another (largest) way to calculate the corresponding precessional rotational
center C0 point location from Sun’s ideal g-center.
———————————————
TABLE REFERENCE: SolenT2022.ods T2 C21 ¦ T21 ¦
AR21
BUT
AS WE KNOW (Detailed ¦ FirstLIGHTtable):
• In an already established thermodynamic
equilibrium — no change — neither any available ENERGY from the light (thermal)
field is on the menu.
• The only known physically related way the
v/c property (LocalGdominance) will affect matter (PotentialBarrier) on collecting any ENERGY input, will be where a radical
THERMAL (pressure) CHANGE — first light — shows up in Sun’s gravitational
field.
So: The energy source history behind the
planetary perihelion precessions can only have that explanation: FIRST
Kepler Momentum — before any light at all. THEN the light came WITH added precessions ON the
light build up credit — related physic says.
• s = absolute largest deviation (s ¦ CENT) SunOrigo(Sun’s G-center)-PrecessionCenter(CENT):
:
The DISTANCE (d=vt) the planet’s precession rotation (v·u/v0) advances in optimal light connecting time (t=r/c) Sun-Planet (r):
s = (r/c)· v · u/v0
The table in
column s lists the values. And, as we see:
• These results are not »particularly»
different from the Coriolis C0-calculated result: Mercury (C0=0.000369.. M) at
most with s = 0.7 M.
Continue on
CaseClosed.
APPENDIX
TheNeutronSquareBreakThrough: Planck
Equivalents ¦ PotentialBarrier ¦ Basic Math Ranks
———————————————
Deducing the electric charge — not represented in
modern corridors ¦ The NEUTRON SQUARE AND THE ATOMIC MASSES — not represented in
modern academic quarters
All these results (All Kepler Math) and their explaining
details are apparently only direct confirmations of the first (1980+) realized
and deduced basic concepts in related physics — as opposed to the established
theory of relativity: On the nature of gravitation (LGD);
On the nature of light (Divergence
Convergence) and the deduction of the electric charge (Q: Light’s related divergence) that lead TNED
to the deduction of the atomic nucleus from The Neutron = Planck constant h = mcr; The atomic masses from the discovery —
in PaintBrush — of The Neutron Square. And further: The K-cell heat physics: The Cosmological General State Equation.
None of these have any mentioning in the modern academic teaching system as so
related.
———————————————
Comparing TNED/MAC — highest mass defects ¦ TheDIFFgraphs
BASIC CONNECTIONS:
TNED RELATED PHYSICS
as deduced through The Neutron Square and its Elliptic Functions
———————————————————————————————————————————
atomic weight U in Dalton (u=1.66033 t27 KG = [mCarbon12]/12) units:
——————————————————————————————
U =
Amn(1–mDme) atomic
weight in atomic mass
units u with
A = mass number ¦ number of neutrons building a heavier nuclei in a Fusion Ring from Dmax
mn = 1.0086652 ........................ Uneutronmass HOP Table 2.1 s9–65]
me = 0.000548598 .................... Uelektronmass HOP Table 10.3 s7–155 for me , Table 1.4 s7–27 for u]
mD =
6 + (1/5)√ 602
– (60 – E–1[A – K])2
¦ general atomic mass defect equation — detailed from The Neutron Square
——————————————————————————————
atomic mass in KG :
——————————————————————————————
m(U) = Uu ¦ (u=1.66033 t27 KG = [mCarbon12]/12)
———————————————————————————————————————————
Analyzing the 6Carbon12/12 mass unit
reference through the NeutronSquare geometrical math, also entails a possible
equation for calculating/testing the Neutron atomic weight value — see NeutronAtomicWeightValue:
Neutron mass
related basics
What we know: no corresponding description
exists on that one in modern corridors. But it would be interesting if it did —
for thorough comparison.
KNe number of electron
masses in Neutron ¦ nu NeutronSquare calculated mean mD for the Uu
candidate
[complex analysis needs a u-averaging
mean u(1 – 1/UNUCLIDE)me with me
= UN / KNe in units of u
— over the whole nuclide chart on its stable nuclides, up to 83Bismuth209:
HOPaver.=15.65059347, CODATAaver.=15.65059995 ¦ ;
6C12 NeutronSquare: nom. 15.6:
The neutron square does not directly hide
the obvious Carbon12 connectivity relative the
rest of the nuclide chart.
Result: The lower statistical average UN
value: HOP 1.0866421, CODATA 1.00866392. Actual HOP
1.00866520.
• UN
— neutron atomic weight U in Dalton u — In
its most simple version
— relying only on the Neutron Square NS geometrical mathematics — the TNED deduced atomic nucleus
[N3m20] and its Central Mass disposition as the whole equivalent number of
electrons in a neutron 1818+18 = 1836 [evenly dividable on 3: 18, 6, 2; 1818,
909, 303, 101] and the NS mD value 15.6 for 6Carbon12,
— the UN calculated value becomes UN = (1836/31.2)(1 – √1 – [62.4/1836]) = 1.0086442629. Not bad for a
simple primitive starters.
hit range: 99.9979241% = 1.0086442629 /
1.0086652000 —— on the most simple
[Planck constant h = UNu · c0 · NeutronGravityCircleRadius, ca 1.32 Fermi = 1.32 t15 M:
h = mcr — mass Kepler Momentum].
See comparing table sources below.
• Modern Academy
1800+. That would have been something — on a best fit: no bald cuts [ provided smart enough to develop
further ..] .. WorldPeace ..
Along with the Encarta u-value in all
UH productions (@InternetAug2008+)
the HOP1967 value U(N) =
1.0086652u has been used as a basic preference
on all further comparing tests.
Shown in the compiled table below are
the TNED Neutron Square calculated comparing results on the
five first stable light atoms:
Used u-values:
TNED =
1.660330000 t27 KG ¦ Encarta99, Molecular
Weight
HOP =
1.660430000 t27 KG ¦ 1967
CODATA =
1.660538782 t27 KG ¦ 2008 ¦ SHARP EL-506W (2005) technical calculator 1.66053886
SolenT2022.ods T2 A80
Comparing
experimental values from different sources with the TNED calculated first light
atomic masses Uu.
TheStarAnvil: How
is temperature generated?
Sun’sRawPower/Effect as TNED-deduced (Sun’s third equation):
TNED: THE RELATIVITY THEORY APPARENTLY CAME ABOUT AS A
PROVISIONAL PRIMITIVE RESPONSE ON THE OBSERVATION THAT UNDERSTANDING OF
ELEMENTARY PHYSICS HAD NOT YET FOUND A PLACE ON THE VISIBLE TABLE. Yes? Say
again.
Modern academic MAC representation — on Earth — of
understanding the thermo nuclear nature of our Sun is apparently and provably
close to a practical doll’s house theater — compared to a related and deduced
real steel natural appearance [The MATH in Light
and Gravitation]: apparently invented. Not deduced.
There
is never any wrong with the math as experienced. Our only problem is in
using any available capability we have developed of understanding its content
and meaning — in accord with the same natural provisions that made our
nervous system the perfect instrument it apparently is. That is: in
co-operation with the same given constructive natural environment. Not trying to create a new one.
We did surrender immediately.
Related and deduced physics and mathematics — what
modern academy completely missed 100%:
GENERAL STAR MATH
Modern academy:
Read from right to left ← illustration above: arbitrary
H-H fusions (H, hydrogen) inside the star globe is
thought to build up a growing Helium core:
•
a remaining decreasing active Hydrogen rim is then driven/pushed
outwards to the surface;
•
on credit of the limited and decreasing volume remaining for the H-H
fusions, the lifetime of the star becomes comparatively (very) short: »No big
deal».
Depending on initial mass (and different phases) the star enters a
second and hotter thermo nuclear phase where the Helium core in its turn can
build heavier elements — as Carbon, with further. At a certain critical point,
modern academy says, the densified inner Helium core »collapses under its own
gravity» (ending as a white dwarf, a pulsar, or a neutron star):
•
the star ends on an implosion, and the outer part explodes/expands
([super] nova burst).
Related physics:
Read from left to right → illustration above: In related physics
the preferences are quite reversed, as deduced;
•
The H-H fusions appear in a small high dense innermost part of the star
— on the rim of a high density star anvil (the inner Dmax
core of the high mass primary celestial body divisions after The K-cell detonation):
THE STAR ANVIL
Related Star physics — exclusively in
UniverseHistory only, what we know:
• All
star stages begin from a first primary Hydrogen-Hydrogen to Helium thermo
nuclear burning period:
All
stars
work as Pulsars — see also PULSARS
— from day Begin,
to day End, related star physics explains, deduces, and proves.
The huge star globe guarantees that the pulsing effect (11.44y for our Sun from start, possibly slightly
slowly decreasing as the star ages). is evenly and (very) smoothly
distributed without glitches over the entire intervals between the long term
short pulsing bursts. The WaveEnergy Density Independence (same as The Tsunami Effect) further
guarantees that the microscopic anvil mantle rim fusion metrics are transferred
as huge (kilometer scale) outbursts at the star’s surface.
•
Periodically — very slow, as Helium is produced from Hydrogen — the high
anvil density attracts a stream of new available hydrogen atoms, leading to a periodic cycle of anvil rim fusion
bursts.
•
The already anvil rim tight positioned and close to each other nuclei
potential barriers, need only very little remaining effort — on a very slow
pushing force — to realize a final extra burst in triggering a fusion
situation. That is the general dynamics explained by and through the TNED
star physics — never present in modern quarters.
•
The burst creates a wave, propagating up through the star’s globe. That
low velocity path involves explicit positron spiraling — ending on the observed
huge flare phenomena (huge solar protrusions) on the star’s surface. These
inner highly electrically potentially charged interactions also incorporates
all the (possible, deducible) magnetic and coronal phenomena of the star’s
physics, TNED says. All of it is (simple) deducible math with results
excellently matching all (here known) well known observations.
See in explicit THE APPEARANCE OF SUN SPOTS.
THE FUSION WAVE (The Wave Energy Density Independence) beginning from
the anvil surface becomes later reflected by the low density at the outer rim
of the star globe. And it is that (mechanical) reflection (reflex) which
promotes and drives the period further on a constant photometric effect — until
all available central hydrogen has been consumed.
•
After hand, as the core makes Helium products from 4(1H1) to 1(2He4),
increases simultaneously the effective Coulomb nuclei product (cp = Z², Z denotes the atom’s electric charge, same
as the atomic number) between two nearby nuclei from 1 to 4. Two He does
not fuse, neither does He and H (and neither
Ne-Neutron: these promptly repel on any such attempt).
•
Thereby the potentially over positive He-nuclei are drawn to regions
where the Coulomb potential is lower:
•
The He-nuclei is slowly pulled upwards towards the star surface (the
opaque high electron density shell):
— Helium flows up, Hydrogen (down-flow)
replaces the vacancies, attracted by the high density central star core’s very
small anvil (some 4 KM radius for our Sun).
•
Simultaneous fresh outer star globe Hydrogen streams towards the anvil
core, filling up what was taken and preparing for a new fusion burst.
The function guarantees that the star burns steadily »in to the last
available Hydrogen atom», as an alcalic battery : a constant voltage is
preserved until the battery power has been consumed.
•
The Lifetime (t = tSUN·n²) on that premises
can be calculated. And we have, related physics, for our Sun a total ideal
Hydrogen burning lifetime of tSUN = 121 T9 y = 121 billion years. Modern
corridors give our Sun only a remaining more cheap lifetime of some 5 billion
years (BA1978s128sp2n).
So, in TNED
our Sun has still some 100 billion years to shine-on, based on the named
premises (see present K-cell Age: 20.8 T9 y).
See details in The Constant Current and SUN’S CAPACITANCE.
•
In space regions where the supply of hydrogen is rich, a star can enter
several new hydrogen burning stages if the star’s remaining core has sufficient
gravity to attract further surrounding hydrogen.
See details in related STAR PHYSICS PART 2.
As
modern academy 1800+ had none of these conditions at its table from start, and
still apparently is feasting on properties not present in any reasonable
universal region, nothing else was to be expected than »perfect math — on
fucked theories». As related. The Kepler centrifugation-area momentum
perihelion precession mathematics, The Math as deduced, apparently is standing as a most prominent example
of this named modern academic issue:
On the art of presenting
mathematics provided by a theoretical WAY of thinking that has presented chaos
to humanity. Please do disclaim anyone who can.
— Humanity was more or
less forced to be invited to develop in a cocoon, governed by an academic
authority based on merits, education — and business. These are horrifying
statements, and would gladly be so accepted if anyone can make the disclaim.
Say again.
TheIAUtest: DETAILS
A general test on all this related
cosmological TNED deduced physics and mathematics
came with the IAU Test: The Sun-’s Photometric Effect
— a direct hit :
On that base, also the present Sun mass
could be tested — as well as the G-factor,
apparently with some further additions: The MATH
Kepler centrifugal-area momentum (the Sun’s thermo nuclear radiation pressure
phenomena) has made definite contributions, as it apparently can be
interpreted.
ConstantPRECISION: 21Nov2022 — Suns4 ¦ The Gtest
RELATED PHYSICS
CONSTANT PRECISION
(mN = 1.0086652u)/u
= U(mn) =
1.0086652 ¦ u = 1.66033 t27 KG = mC12/12 ¦ h
= mNc0rN = 6.62559 t34 JS
DEPENDING
ON PREFERENCES, DIFFERENT END RESULTS APPEAR. The rank above comprises the
K-cell — universe — parameters on the gravitational constant G.
In
related physics, The Ground Station is THE ATOMIC MASSES (derived from The Neutron Square,
unknown in MAC). It is based on the (instrumental epoch’s) standard (1960-1999)
atomic and nuclear values — and once these are taken for The Work, the
resulting tables become locked to these selected factors: neutron, proton,
electron, and further.
Meaning:
— All
further meaningful tests will depend on the basic atomic-nuclear parameters.
The end result will either diverge (the Academy has to start Inventing New Aspects in order to get the machine out) — the theory crashes. Or converge: a direct hit (deduced
results feed their nature, too).
G
and ε0 : The two
foremost available constants open for precision tests — on the cosmological
scale. ε0 has no meaning in related physics’ neutron square
determination of atomic masses. But its role in deducing basic star physics is
(TheStarAnvil)
somewhat decisive.
— PROVIDED we have some
(very) genuine instrumentally measure quantity — the photometric effect of our
Sun — further tests can be accomplished also on the electric constant ε0
as well as on the (normally very elusive) G-factor: the universal/cosmological
gravitational constant G.
NATURAL TESTING CONDITIONS:
♦ IF, namely, there IS a »harmonic solution»
— (the original Kepler idea), which few if any nourish in modern quarters —
TEST will only prove the right way:
• If »no harmony» counts, the test results
will be divergent: »we find no common sense in these equations».
• If harmony is on the menu, the natural
deductions and their results will serve the dinner.
Previously specified
quantities — constants — in UH have been continuously enhanced in testing the
different parts of the mathematically underlying reasoning and theoretical
context.
The IAU Test
on Sun’s photometric effect is a close example:
• The Sun’s calculated raw effect
Praw/A² = ε0 = ρr²Gc0/18 C/VM
became the coined term in
UH when the last part of the rank above appeared as a close — or perhaps, to be
further tested — exact match to the actual real steel practically measurable
physics (The
IAUtest).
The constant ε0
— termed ”vacuum
permittivity” (Greek, epsilon) in modern corridors (vacuum’s capacitivity
number)
Wikipedia 21Nov2022
8.8541878128 t12 AS/VM = C/VM ;
older textbook value (FM1975.s66 Dielektricitetskonstanten
för vakuum, Dielectricity constant for vacuum):
8.8543000000 t12 C/VM first used in UH)
— has several features
when it comes to the established definition.
The ρr
term (Greek, rho, -r) denotes a basically deduced star surface density constant,
8.9277145 t5 KG/M³ for
primarily unrotated stars (first Hydrogen based):
m = ρV = ρ·
4πr³/3 ;
p = F/A =
G(m/r)²/4πr² = G(m)²/4πr4 = akPT4; nuclear radiation pressure
balancing g-contraction
— from
P = aAkT4 , Stefan-Boltzmann’s radiation law where
kP = 2k/c0
and k the Stefan-Boltzmann radiation constant
2π· b4π4/(15h3c02) Stefan-Boltzmann radiation law constant, as deduced , = 5.6699807232 t8 WM–2°K–4
derived from the terms in Planck radiation law (Special deduction from Planck entropy concept)
b Boltzmann
constant, h Planck constant; it ends on
(ρ·r/3)² =
p/4πG = akPT4/4πG ;
ThePoint:
THE electro-magnetically
CONVENIENT APPROXIMATION (See .. ElectricConstant)
ε0 = 1/R0c0
= 1/c0[1/ε0c0] = ε0
¦ R0 = 1/ε0c0 with the conveniently adopted R0/c0
= µ0, the established conveniently termed Magnetic constant, giving
a convenient definition (R0, free space electric resistance)
ε0µ0
= 1/R0c0 · R0/c0 = 1/c0² , hence also a ”definition”
(free space electric and magnetic constants)
ε0 = 1/µ0c0²
with a corresponding convenient µ0 = 1/ε0c0²
, are all — related physics by detail (The Causal Connection: ) — ILL-defined AS EQUIVALENTS:
• LIGHT does not connect kinetics (the Advent of induction and magnetism);
• That is part of the Related Mathematical
Physical explanation WHY magnetism arises out of electric charges moving inside
a given gravitational potential (meaning: a specific given divergence, c: light
speed);
• While the electric field is (ideally for a
point charge) spherically divergent, the magnetic field does not exist at all
if the charged particle is not MOVING inside the given g-potential:
• When it does, the magnetic field propagates
as a PLANE WAVE on right angles to the pacing charge — as the ripples in a pond
when a stone is dropped in it.
• This phenomena (causality) introduces TWO —
not one — different aspects on a metric distance s:
♦ µs ............. spaceINDUCTANCE — projections front-back in the charge’s motional
path
♦ µs ............. spaceMAGNETIZATION — transverse µsINDUCTION:
— While µsMAG inevitably
is associated with a causal c-reduction (ç0) in the vCharge
transverse direction (»space electric field compression»), the ordinary free
space divergence c in the vCharge direction is not, no way, affected: the
electric field has no kinetic connection. However: taking the small difference
between ç and c
↨Rmax/ç0
= R0c0/ç0² = µ0, the more simple
connection will hold: R0/c0 = µ0.
• It is what is known here
Not related in modern teaching system.
THESE TWO HAVE — hence —
in practical physics NO INTERFERENCE:
they never mix
or mingle. No mother god loving way. Magnetism and induction
are two different physical phenomena. The now established ”µ0” term
is a misconception — with discernible quantitative consequences.
♦ Modern academy
(1800+) invented »a mean bridge»
(Maxwell’s Equations) between these two different dimensions — with the
convenient addition of NOT understanding the underlying (quantitative)
mathematics (The inductive-magnetic illuminating ParallelExperiment 1994). Comparing examples are given in Treatise.
The end point then
apparently is:
♦ For the ELECTRIC — just the static electric
field, no magnetism involved — the DEFINITION
↨Rmax/ç0
= R0c0/ç0² = µ0 with ç
= c would do excellently as an EXACT definition of µ0:
• has absolutely nothing to do with moving
electrical particles: no magnetism involved.
♦ For the MAGNETIC part, hence: nada. Undefined physical property; ç0 varies with
magnetic force. Case closed.
The Causal connection defines the (magnetically) increased space resistance
↨Rmax; ↨Rmax leads to a reduced divergent MagneticalSpace
propagation velocity ç — in proportion to the STRENGTH of magnetic force. All
depending on the actual charged particle’s velocity — in c:
• For SMALL v:s ç apparently is (»almost») c.
But that is not a satisfactory definition of a presumed MAGNETICALLY ASSOCIATED
physical constant:
— »It counts only if we
make a doll’s house theater of the universal complex».
SpaceElectricalResistance:
The Electric Constant ¦ ConstantPrecision
RELATED AS DEDUCED (The Causal connection ¦ Electric
Constant):
µ = R/c
...................... space
compactness, VS/AM :
electric propagation
resistance ¦ the R-factor can be understood as »space’s
electrical resistance»
”magnetic constant” in
modern corridors
R = 1/ε0c0
= 376.7255403568 V/A = Ω with ε0 = 8,854300000 t12 C/VM (FM1975.s66)
R = 1/ε0c0
= 376.7303134618 V/A = Ω with ε0 = 8.854187818 t12 C/VM, =
1/(4π t7 · c0²),
see Wikipedia below
(Nov2022).
1/ε0 =
R·c .................. (inverted) »space
access» (space-electric permittivity), VM/AS = VM/C :
space electric
propagation resistance (electric constant)
WIKIPEDIA (21Nov2022,
Vacuum permittivity) reports standard connections suggesting that ε0
be understood as
ε0 = 1/(µ0c02) — with »a resolution»: 1/(µ0c02) = 1/([R/c0]c02) = 1/(Rc0).
RELATED:
ε0 = 1/(4π t7 · c02) ; 1/(4πε0) = 8.98755179 T9 VM/C = k in the electric force law: F = k(Q/r)2 :
• The 4π factor originates from the related deduction of the
electric charge which (Area over Resistance) assumes a spherical morphology
for any elementary divergent electric field:
ε0NUMERIC: ε0 = 1/[ 4πt7 AM/VS · c02 = 8.854187818 t12 C/VM —— Q-deduction:
With ε is associated a [relative] dielectric number
[εr] for a specific material, so
that the end form for ε reads ε = ε0εr:
For vacuum εr = 1.
EXPERIMENTAL measuring of the force in Newtons between two
equal charges Q1 = Q2 = 1 Coulomb separated by r = 1Meter —— c0 = 2.99792458
T8 M/S:
F = (1/4πε0)(Q/r)2 = 8.854187818 t12 N ; F/(Q/r)2 = 1/4πε0 ; 4πε0 = (Q/r)2/F = 1.112650056 t10 C/VM ;
ε0 = (Q2/4πr2F)
= 8.854187818 t12 C/VM = 1/R0c0
¦ ε0NUMERIC: ε0 = 1/[ 4πt7 AM/VS · c0²] =
8.854187818 t12 C/VM
;
R0c0 = 1/ε0 = 1.129409067 T11 VM/C ¦ OHM = V/A · M/S = VM/AS = VM/C ;
R0 = 1/ε0c0 = 376.7303134618 (Ω=V/A) ;
R0/4π = 1/4πε0c0 = 29,9792458 (Ω=V/A) = c0 t7 Ω = R0/4π ;
1/4πε0 = 8.987551787 T9 (Ω=V/A) ;
(R0/4π)/c0 = (29.9792458 Ω)/(2.99792458 T8 M/S) = T7 Ω/(M/S) = 10 000 000 Ω/(M/S) ;
c0 = (R0/4π)/[T7Ω/(M/S)] = R0/(4πT7Ω) M/S = R0t7/(4πΩ) M/S = 2.997924580 T8 M/S ;
R0/c0
= µ0 = 1.256637061t6 VS/AM ¦ OHM = V/A / M/S = VS/AM ;
c02 = 1/ε0µ0 = 1/(1/R0c0)[R0/c0] = 1/([R0/c0]/R0c0) = c0/([R0]/R0c0) = R0c0c0/([R0]) = c02 ;
The Wikipedia article states the equality form: µ0 = 1/(4π t7 AM/VS), mentioning that the use of the 4π factor
”has an approximate value of” the corresponding µ.
That is as — relatedly — deduced:
• ε0 = 1/Rc — which in mass free space (no observable gravitation) can be denoted ε0 = 1/R0c0 .
— What we know: it must be measured, cannot be calculated;
• The c-propagation depends on R, as do the epsilon ε.
• Given c (c0 = 2.99792458 T8 M/S), c depends on c = 1/Rε0.
• What we know: only by measure under given conditions can both Rε0 be determined (on limited figures).
TNED.
HowIsTemperatureGENERATED:
30Nov2022
How is temperature generated?
———————————————
Sun’s Energy production ¦ Sun Physics ¦
RECKONING EXAMPLE:
Radiation
pressure in modern science
In modern science and academy BONNIERS ASTRONOMI 1978 s52sp2 is specified a (star physics: The gas in stars) radiation pressure on the form: temperature to pressure (p←T) according to the expression (rad for radially) as quoted
prad = (1/3) a T4
with a stated as a radiation density constant 7.56 t16 °K–4J/M³ (J/M² = N/M² = Pa, Pascal: pressure unit)
Exercising
Example:
Sun’s surface temperature lies around a rough 6 000 °K. Determine the conventional (T→p) electro-kinetic radiation pressure at that temperature.
Solution:
prad = (1/3)7.56 t16 °K–4J/M³(6000 °K)4 = 0.326592 Pa
Compare the following result —
with further.
HOW IS TEMPERATURE GENERATED?
RECKONING EXAMPLE:
Radiation
pressure in related physics
mass destruction m→γ ¦ releases the entire Planck
Spectrum ¦
affects all nuclei (gamma) and their electron masses
(Compton effect), introducing atomic oscillation: heat:
subdivisions: heat from electric, chemical and
mechanical (friction) sources
In related physics (TNED) radiation pressure in star physics
— it has most definitely no corresponding expression or even theory in modern quarters, see TheStarAnvil
— is deduced and calculated according to the (nuclear converge minus nuclear diverge equals a net resulting fusive radiative factor as the agent for heat and light generation in universe: gravitation is the heat executing agent)
Stars’ general pressure equation
γp = p – pe ..................... radiation pressure, nuclear inductive heat pressure resistance, N/M2
p = G(m2/2r2)2/π
; G gravitational
constant [ 6.67 t11 JM/[KG]² instrumental epoch 1960-2000]
pe = k(Ze/r)2/(πr0)2 ; Z atomic number [nuclear charge] ¦ e electron mass charge 1.602 t19 C ¦ r0 proton rafdius
———————————————
Sun’s Energy production ¦ Sun Physics ¦ DEGENERATION PRESSURE ¦ HOW IS TEMPERATURE GENERATED
RELATED PHYSICS EXPLAINS THE DEEP DETAILS
VERY SLOW
Spontaneous fusion is realized as soon as two nuclei passes
each others nuclear/potential barrier.
In TNED this passage is determined by overcoming the Coulomb
repellant force between two close
nuclei: high gravitational pressure. On a small dense inner
core, and If it works SLOW, it can trigger
LONG pulse intervals on that core’s very thin rim. See StarAnvil.
CentralEnergyMachine: Rex
with the (far extended) nuclear
surface Coulomb divergent pressure pe = k(Ze/r)2/(πr0)2 and
the contractive gravitational star surface pressure
p = G(m2/2r2)2/π = (ρ/3)4/3(4π)1/3Gm22/3
Exercising Example:
Determine the net total radiation pressure at Sun’s photometric visual rim surface distance r = 6.96 T8 M from Sun’s center with atomic base mA = 1.0078252u as the Sun’s elementary base Hydrogen-1 on Sun mass 1.989 T30 KG,
ρ = 3m2/4πr3,
k = 1/4π(ε0=8.8543
t12 C/VM) = 8.98743 T9 VM/C,
G = 6.67 t11 JM/[KG]2,
Z = 1,
e = 1.609 t19 C
and r0 = 1.37 t15 M.
Solution:
p → T
pe = k(Ze/d)2/(πr0)2
= 2.570399939 t17
Pa ; has
no significance outside the star surface
p = (ρ/3)4/3(4π)1/3Gm22/3 =
8.948465699 T13 Pa
γp = p – pe = 8.948465699 T13 Pa
T → p
prad = 0.326592 Pa
RESULT:
The conventional electro-kinetic radiation pressure (prad) — from T to p — as applied to the conventional Planck heat degree quantity has apparently no corresponding generating connection to the related physics deduced thermo nuclear radiation pressure — from p to T. While the latter, apparently, builds the foundation of the former, the former relies entirely upon the latter.
This needs some further clarification — because there is a (an unexpected) connection here.
See further details in But LOOK.
HowTEMP: CentralEnergyMachine
RELATED PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS
How is temperature generated? p →T
See a general overview with
most of the details in
GENERAL GAS LAW, THE BASIC CONCEPTS OF
TEMPERATURE, AND THE ATOMIC MASS UNIT its how and why
Here we only expose the generally explaining illustrations —
according to related physics and mathematics in TNED
1. Calm, very slow, high g-pressure FUSIONS BETWEEN ALREADY VERY CLOSE LYING ATOMIN NUCLEI on the surface of a high density (T17 KG/M³) small StarANVIL radius sphere (primary from the K-cell expansion’s Dmax) release mass energy (E=mc²) — beginning from the highest possible frequences.
2. In TNED highest possible frequencies means (THE NEUTRINO SPECTRUM) that mass is transferred to heat and light from the lowest possible lying fractals in the TNED Planck Ring deduced atomic nucleus, and upwards to higher fractals, last on nuclear surface ringings (gamma radiation).
3. These (neutrino) frequencies — from the most dense parts of the star anvil — affects nearby nuclei, transferring to them the wave energy, thereby creating corresponding nuclear vibrations — the first signs of TEMPERATURE: Temperature is: periodically oscillating (on the atomic sacale) charges, affecting atoms to vibrate, accomplishing (COEI — conservation of energy by induction) transferring massless the destructed mass energy to light and heat.
ComptonEffect: HowTEMP
4. THE TRANSFER is accomplished by an ENERGY EXCHANGE between divergence — the light and heat — and the near MASSES (nuclei, and their electron masses) through THE COMPTON EFFECT:
When light interferes
with mass, some energy is exchanged, changing the path of the mass as well as
the continuing path divergence
and energy of light: light looses frequency — E = hf , h constant: E decreases with f
— as it looses energy to the interacting, pushed, mass. The
phenomena is named The
Compton Effect after its discoverer.
— As the light-mass interactions prevail, light’s frequence
decreases from high to low, according to light’s SPECTRUM.
Whenever the path of a light-wave meets some (atomic) mass object, it also meets the object’s INTERNAL ELECTRIC and magnetic STRUCTURE — as deduced in TNED for The Neutron and electron, and further. A concept that unfortunately has no here known representation in modern corridors: the nucleus surface charge and its np-structure, as well as the corresponding properties of the electron mass component;. Some details are given in SPECTRUM AND QUANTUM NUMBERS.
5. IN THE STATE OF THE ABSOLUTE DEGREE ZERO KELVIN TEMPERATURE, the atomic nucleus and its electron masses are guaranteed to still be united through the »atom physics two kings-equations» in TNED;
Explaining: How it is that an atom continues to preserve a perfect electromagnetic balance on its eventual molecular binding properties — electric and magnetic — even on an absolute zero temperature basis? Perfect equilibrium.
THAT explains THE FOREMOST REASON
WHY the general gas law PRESSURE cannot create TEMPERATURE:
• Temperature depends on mass — molecular structure — and there is no simple connection T→p because pressure depends on the containing circumstances — type of material — and so does temperature:
• Temperature — kinetic mass motion: it exists only where mass is found — can only and ultimately be created from thermo nuclear reactions, as described: star physics, star light.
ModernDegenerationPressure: ComptonEffect
Basic concepts in star physics
MODERN ACADEMY’S electron DEGENERATION PRESSURE
As explained by related physics — it has no physical solidity in the real physical world, TNED says and explains in the following — on explainable reasons.
INVISIBLE INDIVIDUALS ON CLAIMED DOUBLE STARS
ARE DELUSIVE — says the explaining mathematics in related physics — by concrete
comparing examples on given observations
Electron DEGENERATION PRESSURE
STAR
LIGHT white dwarfs RADIATION PROBLEMS
is one of the inventions in modern academy necessary to compensate for lack of Related Physics, says TNED
”formula for the pressure of a relativistically degenerated electron gas”, BA1978s105-106
1.
IN GENERAL AS SHOULD BE
NOTED — what was known at the time of the (here often) quoted BA1978 (Cambridge
Astronomy):
”Eftersom vi har ett så dåligt teoretiskt
grepp om orsakerna till strålningen från pulsarerna, säger oss denna ganska
lite om neutronstjärnornas natur.”, BA1978s114sp1ö; translated:
WHEREAS we have such a poor theoretical
idea on the causes of the reasons for pulsar radiation, it tells us quite
little about the nature of the neutron stars.
2.
”Begreppet pulsar är ett
annat historiskt misstag — pulsarer roterar, de pulserar inte.”, BA1978s68sp2n; translated:
The concept pulsar is another
historical mistake — pulsars rotate, they pulsate not.
3.
@INTERNET Wikipedia
Pulsar 9Oct2008, Werner Becker 2006:
”The theory of how pulsars emit their
radiation is still in its infancy, even after nearly forty years of work.”;
PULSARS: ModernDegenerationPressure
PULSARS ¦ Appendix
Related physics explains:
UNABLE TO DEDUCE the basic star physics from the TNED deduced star’s general pressure equation (REX) modern academy astronomy had no developed vocabulary for understanding remnants of hydrogen burnt out stars as PULSARS:
• Modern academy (1967) established ROTATION along with the common colorful relativistic mathematics to grasp the function:
• No theory exists in MAC explaining HOW a central StarANVIL throws out and withdraws is high density material. See (Swedish edition) So was born the idea of the rotating neutron star (quoted class examples from Maryland 1999).
With exactly — as it appears — the same mathematical expressions, two fundamentally completely different INTERPRETATIONS of a given astronomical radio signal can be demonstrated:
1. The conventional rotation-star-physics on featuring a double star — »periodically obscuring each other»
2. The deduced TNED pulsar mathematics single pulsing and rotating star remnant
(white dwarfs, neutron stars — in reality double stars are the visible ones only, TNED strongly suggests).
The only difference is the INTERPRETATION between
v = d/t 1.
d = vt 2.
Exactly the same radio signal curvature basic data:
———————————————
The PSR-example with detailed mathematics ¦
ALREADY FROM THE START (beginning around 1967 ¦ BA1978s88+: the discovery of the pulsar CP 1919) modern ideas excluded the possibility of THAT a compact (read: high density) star (white dwarfs or neutron stars) at all would have any kind of physical capability to PULSATE or vibrate — as do our Sun according to Stars’ general pressure equation, TNED says. (The terminology ”pulsar” is still in use, see introducing quotes).
How modern degeneration
pressure came about
BUT TO EXCLUDE A related physics PULSING HIGH DENSITY MASS PHYSICS, an idea is necessary to explain HOW that mass — at all — can NOT »implode into a singularity, ending as a black hole», MAC suggested. The fact namely that the object continues to stay (radio) visible, to be a metrically measurable object needs an explanation — having the idea that compact masses otherwise become ”endlessly dense on disappearing size”.
In modern quarters mass
can be compressed infinitely by its own gravitation. In related physics,
gravitation IS the atomic nucleus: gravitation’s fundamental form: it is
already standing on a Zero. See Dmax
¦ Divergence-Convergence.
So: Modern high IQ aces had to invent an electron degeneration collapse-opposing pushing UP pressure in explaining the »why not down of the how is up» (BA1978s105). For the purpose, one took advantage of the famous uncertainty principle (modern academy’s idea that a building in nature must have only one floor: Planck’s structure constant is unrepresented in modern quarters): »if one can measure the electron’s velocity, one cannot determine its linear momentum», and vice verce. In related physics, The Electron is a Quantum, a heap, a mass property. Not a particle, even if the mass property of the electron quantum can take such framing.
We can very well deduce the modern mathematical expression of its invented elektron degeneration pressue — IF we remove the basic deduced properties defining the symbiosis between nucleus and electron. How, is shown in the original Swedish article on DEGENERATION PRESSURE.
We finish this description here by the following quotes:
”Den oupphörliga rörelsen hos elektronen utövar ett tryck, ett degenerationstryck, på dess omgivning, på samma sätt som det vanliga gastrycket åstadkoms av gasmolekylernas ständiga rörelser.”,
BA1978s105sp2n; translated:
The constant motion of the electron
accomplishes a pressure, a degeneration pressure, on its environment, the same
way as the common gas pressure is accomplished by the continuous motion of the
gas particles.
With this degeneration pressure principle, modern academy found its mechanism with which the high density star remnant is understood to resist collapse under its own academic gravitational tug.
”De
stjärnor med liten massa som gjort slut på sitt energiförråd och som går under
beteckningen vita dvärgar, stabiliseras i fortsättningen mot kollaps genom det
elektrondegenerationstryck vi diskuterade ovan.”,
BA1978s106sp2ö; translated:
Those stars with small mass who have
finished on their energy supply and who goes under the naming white dwarfs,
stabilizes in the continuing against collapse through that electron degeneration
pressure we discussed above.
IN MODERN SCIENCE the electron is thought to be a CREATION from the neutron decay — which is the basic reason why modern academy never could deduce a reasonable atomic mass table in concord with experimental results. See The DIFFgraph. ATOMIC mass defects. Not Nuclear.
The Neutron decays to a Hydrogen Atom by giving birth to its BabyElectron — and it CAN take it back.
UniversumsÅlder ¦
SolsystemetsÅLDER ——
original numbers
MilkyWaySunAGE — 20.805Gy ¦ KcellAGE — 20.815Gy
1AU/1pc = Tan 1’’ ¦ 1 pc = 1AU · coTan 1/3600° = 3.08567756702866
T16 M =
1.495978700 M / Tan[1/3600]°
Minimum (NOW) average Galaxy distance (BA1978s324sp2n)
3 MPc ; 3 Mega parsec
KcellZEROdivergenceZONEvelocity v(rZ):
v(rZ) = c0 ; c0 = 2.99792458 T8 M/S
deduced from LGD with c=0: from c0/2 to 0 ¦ the hyperbolic part ¦ DENSITY=D=ρ: w2 = Gm2/r:
c = c0(1/2)(1 – √ [2w/c0]2–1) = 0 = 1 – √ [2w/c0]2–1 ; 1 = 4w2/c02 – 1 ; 2 = 4w2/c02 ;
2w2
= c02 = 2G m2/r = 2G (m2=VD=4πr3/3
· D)/r = 2G4πDr2/3
= r2(8πGρ/3)
;
(r/c0)2
= 3/8πGρ = t2 ; STATIC LinearD ¦ v =
√ 2Gm/r =
√ 2G4πr2D/3 = r√
8πDG/3 ¦ (r/v)2
=3/8πGρ
(r/c0)2
= 3/2πGρ = t2 ; EXPAN accelerD ¦ a=v/t ; v=2r/t ; acceleration
KcellExpans. ¦ (2r/v)2=3/2πGρ
IN ANY CASE — gravitationally determined: no light divergence fate, r = rZ :
(rZ/c0)2 = t2 ; rZ/c0 = t
c0 = rZ/t = v(rZ)
=
vZ ; independent
gravitational
DivergenceIgnition — illuatration’s T
denotes time, from KeplerBasics — The Kcell Foundation
The rZ velocity
has no related connection to the speed of light or light physics as such at
all. v(rZ) is just a result of the Light’s Gravitational Dependency’s equative
form from the gravitational energy’s factor w²=Gm2/r as above
related. As rZ hence is dependent on density alone, its continuing fate after
all K-cell mass has been passed by this rZ is to »activate details further out
— too», that is into the actual general c0-body outside the K-rim — if at all
such a path can be related. Further below.
• v(rZ) propagates with a constant v=c0 —
completely independent of the momentary K-cell specific expanding velocity.
• v(rZ) is a Top Speed light propagation
Equivalent — following not independent of the K-cell behavior.
• See also MULTIPLEc in modern academy.
Basic cosmologically related
physics properties — positive and negative divergence
Variations in electric and magnetic fields — electromagnetic interaction — pertains only to electrically charged masses separated by some definite distance. The superposition principle certifies that property by guaranteeing each individual mass body its own individual gravitational (electric and magnetic) field independent of interaction with other individuals.
With the CosmoA defined equivalents in light and gravitation (GcQ-theorem in ExperimentalConfirmations) these electro-gravitational-magnetical properties are also certified and attested as guaranteed conserved INSIDE such natural elements as the atomic nucleus and its electron masses (the PotentialBarrier) — in explicit attested by the validity of (LGD) light’s gravitational dependency.
MEANING:
• Independent of gravitation (CRM) — as the gravitational potential w2=Gm2/r envelopes increasing masses and so (Fig.1) forces an off state (AbsoluteMETRICS) onto macroscopic electromagnetic fields between separated masses — light’s top divergence property will most certainly be conserved (h=mc0r). That so (CosmoA) because those specific properties — all pertaining to the atomic nucleus and its electron masses — have no definite mass separation properties. Se PASTOM (the principal structure of mass).
MEANING:
When the macroscopic (active electromagnetic interaction) between separate atoms is shut down from gravitation’s forcing c=0 (and lower, CRM), the structural no definite constituents property (Potential Barrier, Q=±e) is conserved (h=mc0r). Meaning: Infinite gravitation (enveloping infinite mass) does not kill the Planck constant (the neutron) h=mc0r. The only thing that happens is or can be so apprehended to happen is that its normal other body sensing macroscopic electromagnetic interference (nuclear magnetic moments) cease to work outside: no friction, no viscosity. Atoms in such a state can (hence) — if nearby electron mass components exist — freely dissolve back into the lighter nuclei atoms from where they originally were fused in an earlier stage of a macroscopic positive divergence. So, by that principle, when the K-cell contracts and returns to a Dmax condition, the former produced K-cell atoms will fragment back to their original neutron basic nuclei. From there, on Dmax where the neutrons feel a physical mechanical contact, the g-energy collected recoil makes the K-cell detonate back into a new state of expansion.
The K-cell detonation mathematics (Jun2012) are exposed by detail in THE SPRING ANALOGY.
See also NEGATIVE DIVERGENCE.
How did it come? Or: how it
came.
A MILKY WAY HISTORY IN related TNED
COSMOLOGY
The following values reflect a previous calculated present
K-cell age of 20.815 Gy — The precision
IAU Sun photometric test [Oct2018+] was tested on a value of
MilkyWay-SolarSystem-age: 20.805Gy.
• The [precise]
values are now [Jan2023+] under [running] further test — on eventually finding
still more precise verifications — if at all.
• Basic raw first
original [2009] K-cell-present age value:
20.81578 Gy on K-cell mass 4.13816 T53 KG and a present [first rounded] cosmic
background radiation temperature 2.7 °K.
THE (SunAgeCRITERIA) MINIMUM TIME after the K-cell detonation necessary to establish an INNER c=0 ideal light wall sphere with a 3 Mpc radius
— meaning a first possible inner wall J-body position near K-cell center with a possible neutron decay, soon forming a Galaxy
— will be
t(3Mpc) = d/v
= 3Mpc/vZ
= 308781373715744 S ; v = vZ = c0 = 2.99792458 T8 M/S
=
9.7845208299
My ; My, Mega year: 1y =
y · 86400 S ¦ 1y = 365.256363004d, d = 1 day [Wikipedia 2023]
That defines a primary situation where (for example) the Andromeda Galaxy (occasionally) lies close to K-cell center, and our Milky way primary J-mother body (mVinJ) at maximum 3 Mpc further out.
That would define a (first) preliminary MARKER with a possible K-cell expansion connection for relating a fair age from the birth of our Galaxy Milky Way (Sw., Vintergatan [VinJ], WinterStreet):
• MilkyWaySolarSystemsBIRTHmoment: No more than 10 My after the K-cell Detonation.
NOTE
that the main mathematical treatise on these details already are given — by
detail very — in (Sw.)
Solsystemen i Vintergatan, SolarSystems in Milky Way. Here these references define the following.
But what about the present
really more narrow MilkyWay-Andromeda distance?
HOWEVER WE ALREADY KNOW by reported astronomical observations (general Wikipedia sources) that the present distance between our (presumed) K-cell center agent The Andromeda Galaxy and Milky Way is only a fraction: some 0.7 Mpc.
DIRECTLY RECKONED — the generally TNED suggested present K-cell age 20.815 Gy — the Milky Way pace from its birth position to the above suggested illustrated (700 Kpc) »close to K-center» would be the average
v(MILKYbegin) = d/t
= (3Mpc – 0.7Mpc = 2.3MPc)/(20.815Gy — 0.01Gy = 20.805Gy)
General: = (aMpc
– 0.7Mpc = bMPc)/(cGy — dGy = 20.805Gy = IAU-testResult:
SunAge)
= 108 093,.387245167 M/S
=
108
KM/S rounded if applicable
Or more precisely:
SolenT2022.ods T2 O200
That is, in order to reach the present (K-center) Andromeda distance ca 700Kpc from original 3Mpc during 20.805Gy, the primary mVinJ mass body would have had an average traveling velocity of 108 KM/S to reach the present position if at all applicable.
Doppler measures — and gravitational red shift issues
DOPPLER EFFECT MEASURING ONLY from our Milky Way outlook IS (very) problematic — IF the exercise is to determine an »ABSOLUTE» distance or some precise velocity quantitiy.
”den extragalaktiska astronomin plågas förvisso svårt av problem som har att göra med tolkningen av rödförskjutningarna och arbetet med att mäta utbredda objekt”
BONNIERS ASTRONOMI 1978 s361sp1ö
Translated (direct word):
The extragalactic
astronomy tormented surely badly is by
problems concerning the interpretation of the
red shifts and the work on measuring widespread objects.
Well described. The examination is — if no preference is known — »more or less impossible».
— Except for one detail:
— IF Milky Way is close to K-center, all red shift measures on the most far away objects from our position in Milky way should expose a more or less uniform distribution of results — practically independent of observing direction. That would expose the K-cell expanding feature: »very much similar independent of the observing line». Almost corresponding to (some type of) »homogenous mass density».
• A more penetrating picture of ”the isotropy” with similar properties in all directions of our universe (with respect to some uniform phenomena) is reported in The NASA GammaRayBurst Map (2012). »Practically homogenous» in all directions.
In TNED there is an additional feature, not present in modern quarters, I’m afraid:
(Well .. it is .. but not THAT way ..)
• From K-center and further out, as the enveloping mass increases — as we would start from the Earth center and advance to the surface — the gravitational potential increases with more mass enveloped: the TNED LGD deduced general cosmological redshift — with zero velocity involved.
(No doubt then, the modern student’s pain in trying to resolve the mystery of our universe ..).
A (short, namely) TNED red shift test (on available common data) on The Andromeda and Milky Way objects DO show (very profitable) results (TheAndromedaTest).
— We can use those results for a further TEST on the provision that is (strongly) aiming at THAT Andromeda galaxy lies (very) close to the K-center, with our Milky Way »just in the vicinity».
A POSSIBLE BIRTH OF THE ANDROMEDA GALAXY GROUP
GRAVITY CENTER K-CELL POSITION
The Birth of Andromeda
THE BIRTH OF ANDROMEDA — in that case — is less dramatic to deduce theoretically than the Milky Way history:
• IT apparently (our Test) is situated (permanently) in (or possibly AS) the K-center — with a correspondingly very small (omittable) positional move over time.
With the K-cell’s constantly inner core always having its zero g-potential and thereby a constant c0 property, it will be easy to understand the first K-cell behavior after its detonation — as suggest in the above illustration:
• Outer (expanding outwards) — as well as inner (pacing towards K-center) — ejecta form future neutron J-bodies (our coming Galaxies).
• The inner parts may directly (from the inner wall force wave recoil ejections) form a first permanent central mother mAndroJ neutron body — from the very beginning of the K-cell expanding moment after its detonation point.
At the K-cell detonation moment, its inner c0-sphere ends at the inne K-cell wall’s c=0 zone (taken on Dmax)
rINNER = 29 713,109 M
= 30 KM rounded.
FAST ENOUGH after the detonation moment, neutron spheres can be ejected from that outwards expanding c=0-wall. Thus forming a potential K-center J-body (gravitationally impacted @K-cellCENTER on practically a preserved Dmax).
MilkyWay (present estimated mass 2 T41 KG or some T11 Sun masses) J-body mass (including its general J-body addition 355 mass factor) represents a primary neutron mass sphere with diameter
Ø9 T8 M
— Which distance our divergence igniting (guaranteeing a beginning neutron decay) vZ is covered by in
t = 9 T8 M/c0 = 3 seconds — no argument taken on the away pacing inner wall rim.
• In our normal Earth laboratories, a neutron decay is reported to need some 12-14 minutes to transfer into a final hydrogen atom;
• There is (hence) plenty of time during say the first five minutes for potential J-bodies — now safely enveloped by a positive macroscopic divergence c>0 to form a common central (Andromeda)J-body.
• As already observed (mVinJ-illustration): All (liquid and liquid alike) matter (TheWaterGIF) associates ejecting forces with (surface) SPIN.
• The only property needed for a primary J-body to develop further spin, is that: It has a small (»omittable») central (inner) spin the moment its inner decaying neutrons begin their fusion phase (see detailed in PrimRot). It is the only sufficient heavy energy source capable of generating the later larger present observed celestial bodies’ rotations (The energy to the planetary rotations), TNED says:
• The origin of a later prominent galactic disc.
»There you go». No more, no less, needs to TNED-explain a potential Andromeda body from a very young new universe — while the rest of its K-cell mass begins to expand with high (but breaking v=√2Gm2/r) pace.
SYNCHRONIZING A POSSIBLE PRESENT MILKY WAY GALAXY
GROUP GRAVITY CENTER POSITION
The present Milky Way position
MORE TRICKY is to lure out — in that case — HOW (»on Earth») our Milky Way happened to end on its present position (illustrated).
Some different scenarios (The5th) has already been drafted in THE ANDROMEDA TEST.
Here we will make a further explaining approach — significant for the K-cell first expansion stadium:
In (MARANA) the referred mass ring analogy
we make below a theoretical experiment with a mass (m) pushed inwards towards the ring center in some different ways. It features a section through the K-cell inner hollow sphere at the moment of our testing Milky Way J-body ejection — some 10My from the K-cell detonation moment.
In figure a a straight inward ejection (in a solid fix ring) would only force the ejected mass to return from where it was ejected.
In figure b the same procedure applies. Only with the difference that the ejected mass returns to the nearest opposite ring wall.
In figure c we have the more practical and possible K-cell expanding situation.
• While the inner K-cell wall is receding outwards (very fast)
— meaning an accelerated reduced gravitational tug on the recently ejected wall mass pacing towards K-center
— a possible physical attraction from a K-cell centered already (heavier) positioned mass could possible capture the wall escaping mass.
• The result would be a minimum rotational coupling between the wall ejected mass (our MilkyWay [foremost 5 members with mass 2.5 T41 KG]) and the already K-cell centered mass (The Andromeda Galaxy Site [foremost 11 members with nearly exactly 4 times (4.0966767201) larger mass 1 T42 KG]). That fits good in itself.
• The mass figures and other galaxy data here from BA1978s315Tabell15.3 — with acknowledged uncertainties.
SolenT2022.ods T2 A270
With
4 times the mass of our Milky Way galaxy group — with possible error
margins — the Andromeda galaxy mass center has good
provisions for collecting an incoming Tourist as a permanent guest — provided a sufficiently
adopted ejecta history.
INVESTIGATING A POSSIBLE ROTATION
Calculating the possible
corresponding rotational velocity
Center distance r = rotational radius MilkyWay-Andromeda = 2.129 T22 M (690 Kpc with the BA1978 data).
Balancing Gravitational-Centrifugal force yields (mANDgroup=1.026 T42 KG ideal AndromedaMassCenter):
F = mVINa = Gm2ANDmVIN/r2 ; a = Gm2AND/r2 = 1,.509497 t13 M/S2 ;
2 equal masses rotate around a common gravity center — or
one of them around the other:
F = ma = må =mw2/r = Gm2m/r2 ;
w2 = Gm2/r ;
w = √Gm2/r ;
m2 = 1.026 T42 KG ; adopted main rotational center:
Andromeda
r = 2.129 T22 M ; present distance MilkyWay-Andromeda
galaxy centers
w = 56 690.5287270725 M/S ; about twice Earth’s pace around the Sun
= 2πr/t ;
2πr/t = √Gm2/r ;
2π/t = √Gm2/r3 ;
t = 2π/√Gm2/r3 ;
= 2.359707 T18 S ;
arcSeconds/1000y = aS/T3y ;
aS/T3y = 1000y · 86400 · 360 · 3600 / t ; 1y = 365.256363004d
= 0.0173323902”/1000y ;
= 0.00173323902”/100y ;
0.0017 arc seconds per each hundred year — can it be detected in reasonable time?
THERE IS HERE NO KNOWN INFORMATION SAFELY SETTLING THE QUEST IF A VALUE OF THE ABOVE MAGNITUDE IS POSSIBLE TO DETECT, AT ALL. There are some hints, though:
• Regular Doppler effects (motion) must be separated from regular gravitational red shift (it has no application at all in modern corridors with respect to a gravitational center for the entire universe, the TNED deduced K-cell).
Comparing present instrumental
precision
In comparing the result with present data on the planets’ perihelion precession (Wikipedia Nov2022), it is seen that no further measures than beyond Mars have reliable values. That is: probably on a limit of 1”/100y.
• The example above (0.017”/1000y) would correspond to 0.0017”/100y, similar to a determined value near Uranus’.
That is at present what we know not technically possible.
The apparent only (at present) possible would be:
— »The calculated values lie (well) within the possible margins — at present», unless disclaimed.
WE CANNOT by any instrumental observations EXCLUDE THE POSSIBILITY.
super
position principle: each body — mass — has its own individual g-field — light
field — independent of interference and interaction with other masses
LIGHT’S GRAVITATIONAL DEPENDENCY
negative divergence — dormant non decaying neutron mass
nuclei body — the general c0-body: c0 is conserved independent of gravitation:
The Neutron: h = mcr
Gm22/r = G(n→∞)m22/(n→∞)r ¦ CosmoA ¦ ComIN
by unknown never formulated reasons, academic literature has no mentioning of the rank’s equivalent
simple meaning: endless supply on limitless extension
although the concept is
frequently met in geometrical mathematics [ComIN]
calculus.
PROVING AN EXPANDING MASS BODY ON ITS previously contracted
G-ENERGY IS FORCED TO RETURN CONTRACTING again from Dmax
COSMOLOGY BASICS IN RELATED PHYSICS
vKcellRIM = [vESC=(√2Gm2/r)/3]
CosmoA — ComIN ¦ SunAGE ¦ General Divergence J-Body Neutron Decay Ignition ¦ DETONATION DEDUCTION detailed
m2 = m0cK
= 4.16 T53 KG — Planck
Constant h = mcr = The Neutron ¦ origin: never created ¦ quantity: limitess
supply —
an idea CosmoA
modern academic thinking never could accept
K-cell expansion Reference values 25Jan2023:
rKcellRIM = (Gm2t2/2)1/3 ¦ vKcellRIM = (√2Gm2/r)/3 – vOFFSET@KcelltMAX ¦ KcelltMAX = tPmax¦16.321Gy · √[(1/3 – 99.3He%/3)–1 – 3] = 337.777 Gy ;
vOFFSET@KcelltMAX = 0.243c0 ¦ vKcellRIMbegin@(Dmax¦1.82T17KG/M³) = 2.75 T15 M/S = 9.163 T6 c0 ¦ SolenT2022.ods Tabell5:
HalfPeriodMassLoss 2.912870473 T51 KG ¦ 0.7% mK ¦ rMAX 1.161470629 T27 M ¦ rZMAX 3,185446452 T27 M ¦ rZc0BodyPenetration 2.7r ¦ vRefillContractiveMean 0.356c0 ¦
c0bodyDensityK-cellWALLAtRefillBegin 2.26 t32 KG/M³
¦
PROVING AN EXPANDING MASS BODY ON ITS previously contracted G-ENERGY IS FORCED TO RETURN CONTRACTING again from Dmax
• In modern academic cosmological theory the conditions are different:
• It is already from square one decided (academic consensus) that ”The Big Bang” was not preceded by any contractive period, but is a one time unique occasion in the history of time.
• Then the meaning of »a previously collected g-energy» has no meaning: no reference;
Modern academy has no developed mathematical vocabulary to discuss such a possibility.
• Modern academic cosmology only deals with measuring quantities on that premise.
• In related physics no such delimiting conditions exist: we have to try all possible ways:
• Because collected on a previous contraction, exactly the same g-energy releases an expanding — bouncing — recoil. Meaning: doomed to repeat a contraction again — nothing said about the inner distributive densities at all. These are automatically included, any way we reckon. There is no essential mathematics to prove.
Graphs: y = x2/3 RIM ¦ y = 1/x DENSITY ¦ x TIME
Planck Constant h = mcr = The Neutron ¦ origin: never created ¦ quantity: limitess supply — an idea CosmoA modern academic thinking never could accept
BASIC PROOF: vESCape
Gm2m/r = Fr = mv2/2
gravitationEnergy =
Work = KineticEnergy ;
√2Gm2/r = v ; escape velocity
— NoGravitationalPullBackOnceEjectedLowerLIMIT
Proving application — not valid:
expansion physics has no vESC validity
APPLICATION — NOT VALID:
vESCAPE HAS
certified
validity — only in a STATIC physics condition: mass outside
solid body:
the situation has no expanding body validity: no such math —
no such situation:
This situation — a minor part is ejected — is
the only mathematically deducible
where an escape velocity is applicable in
physics.
Proving application — valid:
expansion physics has no vESC validity
APPLICATION — VALID:
vESCAPE HAS
not certified
validity at all — a DYNAMIC physics condition; no mass outside solid body
the situation has expanding body validity: but no vESC math
— no such situation:
This situation — a complete mass
defragmentation by body expansion — has no resemblance to
an escape velocity application in physics.
vKcellRIM
= [vESC=(√2Gm2/r)/3]
— Why not? Why is a v=√2Gm2/r expanding K-cell not applicable to a »NoGravitationalPullBackOnceEjected»?
vESC is a STATIC — vK is a
DYNAMIC
(expanding-contracting) — There is also a Derivative
aspect — showing that vESK = 3vK. See vESCdiv3 ¦ LimitESCAPEVELOCITY
• Because there is no concept of an EJECTED mass OUTSIDE it. (»noMath, noPath»).
no mass exists
outside the expanding mass:
»the mass is intact, however expanding»: it must return The Mass:
←(Gm22/r = m2v2/2) + (Gm22/r = m2v2/2)→ = 0
the expansion must — is forced to — end on a smallest but
definite limited average density, forcing the body mass to return back again
on its same
original collected contracted gravitational energy E = Gm²/r
partial proof: see LimitESCAPEVELOCITY
: the ideal vESC is 3 times higher than the whole body expansion rim velocity
• The STATIC v = √2Gm2/r EXPRESSION does not apply
— on a limitless condition for a DYNAMIC (EXPANDING) application:
• the expansion theDynamic returns a contraction.
— Why? Why does it return a contraction?
• Because the dynamical situation has no real mathematical in general and physical in specific connection to the real limitless STATIC condition for a dynamic application.
no mass exists
outside the expanding mass
IN THE DYNAMICS CASE:
• And if it has no connection, it has no mathematically or physically provable validity:
• the expansion returns a contraction:
• the expanding situation has no verifiable condition of a time unlimited extension.
Graphs: y = x2/3 RIM ¦ y = 1/x DENSITY ¦ x TIME
Planck Constant h = mcr = The Neutron ¦ origin: never created ¦ quantity: limitess supply — an idea CosmoA modern academic thinking never could accept
A cyclic —
bumping metrics — procedure outside a body (PULSARS) follows a cycloid (or a parabolic) — flat top — curvature in time.
But inside — entailing the complete of — a mass, the flat top function does not
apply. And
there are no such known actual normal kitchen procedures to test on either.
gravitational energy EGRAVITATION
Equivalents are equivalents.
———————————————
m/[n→∞]&r/[n→∞] The Planck Ring ¦ m[n→∞]&r[n→∞] The General Cosmic
But modern academy 1800+ constantly did fuck with these — by
DRIFT [ »cosmological Stupidity» ], not by any plan:
— Bending, forming, denying mostly, reformulating, inventing
New, rejecting Old .. ”.. water came from outside ..” .. Dmax
So:
IF we wish to continue in holding on to basic mathematics
you know: Left .. Right .. 1 .. 2 .. 3 ..
»don’t get creative, just follow OUR basic Natural
Instincts ..
(.. free oxygen for all ..)»,
UNnewGlobalHits »KillThePlanet» ..
DRIFT. Not Plan :
— »As long as we hold on to our Consensus,
everything will be just Fine».
If any lightening is spotted, please
do disclaim.
there is apparently and obviously not much to choose on in deducing the rest of the kitchen’s details:
• WHEREVER WE LOOK there is always — no exception — more mass behind.
• The reason we are here NOW — because stars, Sun, consumes mass for light and heat — apparently IS — compare: look back and see — an endless supply of MASS (dormant neutrons as suggested above):
by unknown never formulated reasons, academic literature has no mentioning of the rank’s
equivalent simple meaning: endless supply on limitless extension
although the concept is
frequently met in geometrical mathematics [ComIN].
A refill certifies a pulsating cosmic central cell for each new turn on a contraction (conservation of angular momentum) — like an eternal organic cell.
Eternal pulse. Gm22/r = G(n→∞)m22/(n→∞)r. Endless supply on limitless extension.
• This author has no problem in converting to other interpretation of the mathematical rank, provided some discovered reasonable argumentation. Searched for. Non yet found.
IT IS ALL A TEST. So we are completely independent of Theory. Just practical Results.
— We follow — test — the mathematics. Like building an instrument: every part of the work is certified as genuine ONLY if it has a physical function: no flaws. TEST decides.
Mathematics’ five foundational laws — how the whole story
began .. The Term has no here known modern academic correspondence.
The v=√2Gm2/r
function can be used — as a LIMIT function:
»v never reaches zero — so: the vEXPANSION to a vCONTRACTION
must — is forced — to follow over a TIP
^ turning point» if
we use the limit function.
• Otherwise
»we are in deep mathematical and
some physical
trouble».
— Is that so? Explain ..
• A
direct mathematical proof
telling that the static vESCAPE=√2Gm/r
does not (really) apply to our K-cell expanding complex, is given (PRIMvFORM) from the KcellRIMr form’s (KcellEXPANSION KeplerMATH ρ=3/2piGt²) r-form r=t2/3(Gm2/2)1/3.
Namely so: Its derivative v=dr/dt gives
v = (4Gm/27t)1/3 which — really, after some reckoning
(vESCdiv3) — shows up equal to (vESCAPE=√2Gm/r)/3:
• The
derivative result certifies
that a K-cell expansion (based on simple
central force action Kepler mathematics) definitely holds (much) LESS
pace than the ideal static vESCAPE velocity function: The K-cell mass will
inevitably stop expanding and reverse to a contracting mode.
TEMORESOM: — RedShiftIssues ¦ CosmicINTRO
wave equation
THE MODERN ACADEMID RED SHIFT
SYNDROM
MODERN ACADEMY THINKING
accepts it with applications on individual masses (The Mössbauer Effect).
It is the same physical
phenomena as deduced by TNED from light’s
gravitrational dependency (The GPS Example).
But modern academy
refuses to even think of the possibility that the mass of the universe itself
has expanded from a gravitational center — that our universe has evolved,
expanded, from a gravitational center — that our univserse HAS a gravitational
center — which again is absurd as modern academy already has so stated it from
its idea of a Big Bang.
• An idea of a gravitational expansion (Modern
Academic Multiplec) is apparently
inevitable with the idea of an expanding universe (Hubble 1929). But modern
academy denies it.
Anyway
we reckon, given a definite mass
because Origo where
gravitational potentials cancel always is a massless
light-divergence xyz POINT in empty massless space where always a maximum c0 =
2.99792458 T8 M/S resides
with
any density property taken on any extension from Origo, any math, any physics,
inevitably
inescapably entails a decreasing light divergence from c0 towards 0.
Gravitational redshift.
The
Absolute Metrics of it guarantees that Atomic-electric measures in any space
region always will receive one and the same empty space c: c0 = 2.99792458 T8
M/S:
c
= λf = λ(n→∞)f(n→∞)–1
= λ(n→∞)–1f(n→∞):
absolute time measuring cannot be made based on electric devises: local
gravitation compromises that.
How variations in c on
LIGHT’S GRAVITATIONAL DEPENDENCY (LGD) are calculated in related physics and mathematics:
———————————————
Compare MODERN ACADEMY [ the Einstein and Schwarzchild solutions:
”nothing faster than c” ].
SolenT2022.ods
T2 A94 — See Φ=Fi
explanation in Deduction [differentiates between
the two equative branches CircleHyperola].
The LGD equation for c as exemplified we move from max c=c0 in Origo to Earth’s top surface c at Requator 6.378 T6 M
c = c0(1/2)(1 + √ 1 – 4w2/c02)
from
ORIGOc0¦w² = 0 to c0/2¦w² = c0²/4
gives c = 0.999999999305c0 at Earth’s sphere surface rim.
• At w2=c02/4 is c/c0 = 0.5.
— Further on with increasing r the c-form expression changes seamless from a first half circular to the limitless uniform hyperbolic
c = c0(1/2)(1 – √ 4w2/c02
– 1) from c0/2¦w² = c0²/4 to c → 0¦w² depends on mass or density
• At w2=c02/2 is c/c0 = 0.
— From there further out on the hyperbolic branch.
See also quotes in TauKelvinSources
RELATED PHYSICS EXPLAINS THE UNIFORM COSMIC BACKGROUND
PLANCK HEAT RADIATION REMNANT
2.725nn.. °K
KcellHeatPhysics — CMB
A RADIATIONSPHERE DEVELOPS in (0°K)
free space
on Stefan-Boltzmann’s radiation law’s
T = (P/aAk)1/4
k 2π · b4π4/(15h3c02) Stefan-Boltzmann radiation law constant, as deduced , = 5.6699807232 t8 WM–2°K–4
a absorption coefficient, nominal 2/3 for all
first class hydrogen normal stars
A 4πr2
radiation sphere’s radiative shell rim
with effect/power P (general transient effect-energy function, after some developing)
P 2Emax · √27/â · nt(3+nt2)–1
nt rcx(86400c0y)–1 ¦ y =
365.56363004d ¦ d = 86400 S
rcx √[(8 î )–1 · √27/â · Emax] ................. = rcx@Pmax
î 4π(3τ)4ak
â r0N2(mn/me)e·mVIZ(mn·u)–1
r0N h(mn·u·c0)–1
Emax mDHe · me·u · mVIZc02(mn·u)–1
¦ mDHe = 6+12cos(π/4) NeutronSquareMath: 14.485281374
mn 1.0086652
me 0.000548598
mH 1.007825190
u 1.66033 t27 KG
h 6.62559 t34 JS
c0 2.99792458 T8 M/S
τ 2.725 °K
mVIZ mH·u/mHs · 4π(rVIZ)3/3
mHs nominal 10 M³: 1Hydrogen atom per average 10 M³ space in
rVIZuniverseSPHERE ¦ BA1978
rVIZ 1025.0072 Mpc — nominal 1000 Mpc BA1978
t@Pmax 2rcx(√1+K2)/c0
K 1.5 ¦ c0/v = 3/2 = c/vx = 1/(1 – λ0/λ) = 1/(1–L) = K ¦ nominal Kconnection ¦ Doppler-G-RedShift math
τrz (P/[4πak· rZ2])1/4
¦ Kcell rZrim spherical shell temperature
— from start max 2 255 705.364 °K [from a Ø30KM sphere]
rZ c0t ¦ tOFFSET = tMIN = 1.983220 t4 S = 198,322 µS
t running
time in K-cell expansion history ¦ nominal tMAX: 336 Gy
ON ITS outer shell:
RADIATION time equalizing space STREAMING FROM expanding OUTER SHELL RIM TO INNER K-CELL CENTER
• The rcx@Pmax power (effect, Watt) maximum on the
Power-Energy equation on the five given premises
(General data from Cambridge International Astronomy 1977/78 Swedish edition Bonniers Aastronomi) mHs(1H/10M³), rVIZ(1000Mpc), average 25%He 75%H, CMB(cosmic background Planck heat radiation temperature, ”cosmic microwave background radiation”) 2.7°K (nominal rounded original), and K(from 2/3¦BA1978s375), adjusted with related physics gravitational red shift (light’s gravitational dependency, which has no academic representation, see Kconnection)
is reached after t@Pmax=2rcx(√1+K2)/c0=16.32Gy on a local Planck heat kelvin Inner (rVIZ) expanding shell rim (the farthest averaged faintest light preference objects) degree of 8.175 °K. After that rcx@Pmax point, the entire K-cell mass has been c>0 electromagnetically activated. And there is no more K-cell mass to be included in the history of primary star births. That point marks the maximum Planck heat kelvin degree which will equalize by decreasing through space along with the continuing K-cell expansion.
In related physics deduced (LGD) light’s gravitational dependency
(r/c0)2
= 3/8πGρ = t2 ; STATIC LinearD ¦ v =
√ 2Gm/r =
√ 2G4πr2D/3 = r√
8πDG/3 ¦ (r/v)2
=3/8πGρ
(r/c0)2
= 3/2πGρ = t2 ; EXPAN accelerD ¦ a=v/t ; v=2r/t ; acceleration
KcellExpans. ¦ (2r/v)2=3/2πGρ
the neutron decay (c>0) activating (divergence ignition) expanding zone (rZ) pacing the running K-cell expansion is derived and deduced as a gravtitation-potential factor — not a light physics propagating property. That is: v(rZ) = c0 by methematical consequence:
it apparently
runs gravitationally indepent on a constant v=c0 as if in a free c0-space with
zero — none — gravitational potential.
It means that we can calculate a corresponding TIME (t = rcx/c0) DISTANCE defining a REPORTING TIME of the Pmax 8.175 °K into the K-center region — in which the observer of the sitiation apparently is situated, for further reporting tests. It is — namely, in related physics LGD — shown (LightPathIntegral) that — when adding all the contributions on the expanding K-cell feature — the LIGHT SIGNAL REPORTING TIME from the K-cell inner wall expanding rim to K-cell center is (t@Pmax) practically identical with* the ideal c0 space travelling time taken on the rim distance at a given time (t@Pmax):
tRunPmax = 4.527 Gy = rcx/c0.
*————————————*:
Referring a (t@Pmax) comparison on K=1.5
from the deduced Kconnection shows a difference first in
the 16th decimal.
• It should
be noted: after the t@Pmax moment, the inner K-cell wall has
disappeared: all K-cell mass has already been electromagnetically activated.
Meaning: There is no more any Stefan-Boltzmann radiation law Planck heat K-cell
generating temperature measure to refer to. See the corresponding Planck
heat CMB Sphere. Meaning: the (here, where we are, observed
K-center region) Planck heat remnant 2.725 °K can only refer to the last
wall occasion @Pmax; it is its remnant mirror.
— We can though still use the temperature equations’
results (as references) also after t@Pmax as these temperature
values steadily approaches 0°K along with the continuing K-cell expansion.
Measuring a Planck heat degree of 2.725 °K in the testing observing position of the K-cell center, then apparently defines the KcellAGE at that K-central region Planck heat observed degree: 16.321 + 4.527 = 20.848 Gy. The KcellAGE as observed here with the reported 2.725 °K. The originally used values in this UH production (2004¦2008) had more (approximated) parameters, giving slightly different end quantities.
All deduced details are explained and given in (16Nov2008) UniverseHistoryKcell.
RelatedCMB: CMBdetails
See also quotes in TauKelvinSources
BOTTOM LINE RELATED PHYSICS CMB INTERPRETATION
CMB — established term for Cosmic
Microwave Background radiation — the remnant Planck heat 2.725 °K
measured phenomena covering our empty space uniformly at all directions — apart
from smaller but systematic deviations on the scale 2.725nn..
• The CMB cosmic [
microwave ] background radiation has no Doppler source object:
— There is no moving object to refer to [the heat degree
2.73.. is uniformly distributed in all directions]:
• The CMB cosmic [
microwave ] background radiation apparently refers a
THERMODYNAMICAL EQUILIBRIUM [with small ±-variations ..
depending on observational direction] — very slowly decreasing towards 0°K as
the universe continues to expand over huge time periods — practically constant with
our time preferences.
• It resembles the
same situation as the planets moving inside the already established Sun light
field — with already established Kepler momentum kinetic and planetary orbit
perihelion precessions — with no further additions or interferences, as we
know: Doppler Transparency to surrounding space.
• Space
itself THERMAL
EQUILIBRIUM has no Doppler property, what we know.
• Planets traveling
inside the Sun’s light thermodynamical equilibrium exhibits no motional
resistance: no »SpaceDoppler». And neither should our Galaxy in the CMB,
related physics strongly suggests.
• In
modern corridors
the CMB minor variations is interpreted as divulging a MOVE.
• In
related physics it HENCE
AS DEDUCED relates a STAY. That needs some explanation.
— The CMB is Doppler Transparent, related physics strongly
suggests.
— Associating a move in that phenomena, definitely creates
more question marks than it resolves.
We didn’t see that coming (either):
• Exactly as in the (related physics) explaining treatise of the planets’ perihelion precession ENERGY ORIGIN and the present comparing situation:
• Masses moving through empty space with its already fully established starlight based on a thermodynamical equilibrium, meets no motional resistance. Because
• light is
massless:
• light develops
no centrifugation
¦ SolarEclipses
• light does not
connect kinetics
¦ ExperimentalConfirmations ¦ ThePerihelionPrecessions ¦ TheEnergySOURCE
MEANING (shocking — do disclaim if faulty):
masses traveling through the CMB develops not motional doppler effects,
as
masses traveling through the already settled State SunLightField
develops not motional doppler effects from the surrounding space traveled (as
we do not hear specific audio
performances because traveling through still air):
The CMB represents a thermodynamical equilibrium — empty space — where no specific
moving source object exists.
The CMB (”the great sky cosine”: the fractional deviations [2.725nn..] depending on measuring direction) proves a universal gravitational center: gravitational redshift. Not included in modern corridors.
It is not a MOVE.
It is a STAY.
Compare also the results in THE ANDROMEDA TEST. Investigating a K.cell center possibility..
— Yes:
These results resolves and describe the same phenomena, no doubt.
However, we still need some (deeper) related description to clarify the details beyond any final doubt: The ship is in sight, but not yet in harbor.
See further detailed description in RelatedPlanckCMB.
RelatedPlanckCMB: Related
See also quotes in TauKelvinSources
The PLANCK HEAT CMB SPHERE In RELATED PHYSICS
CMB — established term for Cosmic
Microwave Background radiation — the remnant Planck heat 2.725 °K
measured phenomena covering our empty space uniformly at all directions — apart
from smaller but systematic deviations on the scale 2.725nn..
The subject has grown (fast).
The already well known CMB details in established corridors, were never (hardly) before at all mentioned in any UniverseHistory production (@InternetAug2008+).
The TauKelvinSources quotes (with notes) give the necessary background idea.
• As much as the related physics mathematics have correctly nature referred premises, the related physics explanation, and deduction, to the instrumentally observed conventional term CMB has noting in common with the corresponding established interpretative ideas and their mathematics on the subject. See CMBdetails for a short mathematical exhibition on the central formula.
Related physics:
• The reported Planck heat cosmic background radiation kelvin temperature 2.73.. °K
• reflects a practical thermodynamical equilibrium — uniformly distributed over all directions as seen from the K-cell gravitational center c=c0.
• The CMB has no moving objects to refer to.
• The CMB is a STAY. Not a MOVE.
• The CMB decreases slowly about 1.2 t9 °K/y , = (8.2 – 2.73)°K/4.527Gy (or 1.2µ°K/1000y) with the continuing expansion of the universe (K-cell expansion in TNED).
• Observing the CMB from outside the K-cell g-center, (upper part illistration) predics an exposed corresponding diametric minimum-maximum difference on the CMB small scale fluctuations (milliKelvin. 2.725..), as reported (Barrow1994).
• IF such observations are interpreted as a regular Doppler MOVE, the results lead to gravely confusing, misleading and deceptive conclusion about the nature of the phenomena, related physics says — unless disclaimed as so related:
• Present established scientific corridors have no developed concept of GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT: Light’s gravitational dependency (LGD ¦ AbsoluteMETRICS — GPSexample ¦ ThePerihelionPrecessions — AllKeplerMath ¦ ExperimentalConfirmations).
• The (CosmoA ¦ 1800+) popular basic academic cosmological idea of a limited cosmic mass (”c everywhere” — The v+ic-error) has no related physics or mathematics foundation,
Gm22/r = G(n→∞)m22/(n→∞)r ¦ CosmoA ¦ ComIN
by unknown never formulated reasons, academic literature has no mentioning of the rank’s
equivalent simple meaning: endless supply on limitless extension
although the concept is
frequently met in geometrical mathematics [ComIN].
as so related. The modern (1800+) academic idea of a limited cosmic mass is so apparently only an acdemic consented invention — as so proved and clarified by the simple CosmoA gravitational energy equivalents. Equivalents are equivalents.
The corresponding phenomena is now (1900+, and growing) interpreted by established science where gravitational redshift phenomena is only accepted on individual masses (termed Mössbauer Effect), not on the universe as a whole on so, says related physics, misleading concepts of MOVE. As exemplified: ”dark energy” (2011 Nobel price) and other highly confusing and misleading ideas (”The Great Attractor” and others increasingly mystical ”new physics”) behind the phenomena as suggested above.
WIKIPEDIA (24Jan2023 The Great Attractor) reports that the resulting MOVE (Doppler) calculations from the CMB observations points out that the whole termed Local Group (LG)
(Milky Way + Andromeda galaxies cluster gravity center — some rounded 1Mpc space sphere: distance MilkyWay-Andromeda rounded 700Kpc = 0.7Mpc [1Mpc = 3.08567756702866 T22M] related physics avoids using LightYears LY in cosmology due to light’s gravitational dependency: LY associates misleading ideas of distance, because the speed of light varies with local gravitation, see AbsoluteMetrics: we use direct meter or parsec or astronomical units AU instead).
is moving towards The Great Attractor having a distance of ”47-79” Mpc — based on MOVE interpretations:
Comparing a basic cosmological more related connection the TNED ANDROMEDA TEST (very, by the recently mentioned gravitational redshift STAY phenomena) instead strongly suggests this situation:
Related Physics
suggested cosmological solution, The Andromeda test Dec2021
Natural scales
———————————————
ITEM ¦
Between Milky and Andro (more near Andro, Doppler Gravitational Red shift TNED analyze says). The K-cell center lies more close to Andro than Milky, related physics says — or strongly suggests, provided the testing calculations/gravitational red-shift-iterations and provision (basic Doppler observational data) are naturally accurate:
• The Doppler data — interpreted as pure gravitational red shift — state that
• the
two galaxy gravity centers are NOT on any collision course
— rather a possible bound (small) rotation (preferentially difficult to settle by quantity instrumental observations): see PossibleAndromedaBirth (demanding an instrumental resolution of 0.00173323902”/100y — IF Milky-Andro g-centers distance is constant: no Doppler MOVE, just gravitational red shift STAY [AbsoluteMETRICS — GPSexample] on different sides of the position of a genuine cosmic gravitational center: K-cell heat physics as deduced).
More short, related physics says:
Present established scientific astronomical quarters
apparently are looking for the answers in the wrong direction, related physics
says,
(in addition) with a phenomenal cosmological foundation very much unrepresented in their student’s corridors: CosmoA.
Continue further on TheCMBanomalies.
The CMB anomalies — 25Jan2023 — RelatedPlanckCMB
THE ONLY HERE KNOWN AT PRESENT ON LINE REASONABLE
EXPLAINING PHENOMENAL SOURCE: THE NASA DESCRIPTION
Very simplified — so also all PhD:s can come along .. we leave no
one behind ..
These very
schematic illustrations comprise the more complete NASA illustrated
description. Here it is intended to cut down the principle phenomena down to an
absolute simple basic — in line with related physics descriptions (»we leave no
one behind»).
NASAquoteCMB: CMBanomalies
By Quote:
NASA — National Aeronautics and Space Administration
FLUCTUATIONS IN THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND ¦ LastUpdate 20Aug2014
comparison of the images
produced by the COBE science team
” The orientation of the maps are such that the plane of the Milky Way runs horizontally across the center of each image. The top pair of figures [a] show the temperature of the microwave sky in a scale in which blue is 0 Kelvin (absolute zero) and red is 4 Kelvin. Note that the temperature appears completely uniform on this scale. The actual temperature of the cosmic microwave background is 2.725 Kelvin. The middle image pair [b] show the same map displayed in a scale such that blue corresponds to 2.721 Kelvin and red is 2.729 Kelvin. The "yin-yang" pattern is the dipole anisotropy that results from the motion of the Sun relative to the rest frame of the cosmic microwave background. The bottom figure pair [c] shows the microwave sky after the dipole anisotropy has been subtracted from the map. This removal eliminates most of the fluctuations in the map: the ones that remain are thirty times smaller. On this map, the hot regions, shown in red, are 0.0002 Kelvin hotter than the cold regions, shown in blue.”,
NASA
— National Aeronautics and Space Administration
FLUCTUATIONS
IN THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND ¦ LastUpdate 20Aug2014
https://wmap.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_cosmo_fluct.html
Comment:
”.. results from the motion of the Sun relative to the rest frame of the cosmic microwave background.”
As recently stated — related
physics:
Related physics cosmology has cosmological descriptive mathematics — STILL FOR TEST — not represented in modern corridors:
• The cosmic background Planck heat radiation (2.725 °K) connects to what does not exist in modern corridors:
• GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT — a STAY. No Doppler MOVE. Foundation:
Gm22/r = G(n→∞)m22/(n→∞)r ¦ CosmoA ¦ ComIN
by unknown never formulated reasons, academic literature has no mentioning of the rank’s
equivalent simple meaning: endless supply on limitless extension
although the concept is
frequently met in geometrical mathematics [ComIN].
Our universe has a central gravitational center determining the range of gravitational redshift depending on mass distributions further out. AND of this suggested (The Andromeda test) magnitude:
Related Physics
suggested cosmological solution, The Andromeda test Dec2021
Natural scales
———————————————
ITEM ¦
• CMB interpretations along with Doppler MOVE ideas safely transfers the whole cosmic scene to a veritable vandalized MESS, related physics strongly suggests.
• SO ESPECIALLY (c) on the bare idea of the stated (»SunMove relative CosmicPlanck°K RestFrame»)
”.. results from the motion of the Sun relative to the rest frame of the cosmic microwave background.”,
:
Please excuse:
These aces really have a
real cosy sunny place for their good idea of The Universe:
— So: Why bother at all
to measure — it is already academically assented as settled.
— Why not instead favor
lottery: »Free family vacations in Jerusalem»?
— »We are unique in
thought». Very High IQ, MustBuyBook. It is such a joy.
Please: Present the COBE
data as seen from the measuring point.
(And STOP ADDING ACADEMIC
CONSENTIVE VIEWPOINTS).
(CONSENSUS — decision —
is no scientific subject, never will be).
If that is possible, at
all. Then we'll talk. Thank you very much.
• TRY the already given simple mathematics,
and take it from there:
Gm22/r = G(n→∞)m22/(n→∞)r ¦ CosmoA ¦ ComIN
by unknown never formulated reasons, academic literature has no mentioning of the rank’s equivalent
simple meaning: endless supply on limitless extension
although the concept is
frequently met in geometrical mathematics [ComIN].
• a simple
conventional classic gravity center.
— If it can be excluded on related foundations — make
me convert.
The conditions were better year 1311.
(»SunMove relative CosmicPlanck°K RestFrame»). There is no such in related physics.
— However, related physics says, there apparently IS a diametric (sine in PREFIXxSINE) difference in instrumental measure, as so illustrated schematically (RelatedPlanckCMB)
— PROVIDED THE MEASURING INSTRUMENT IS POSITIONED OUTSIDE THE K-cell (Universal Cosmic) gravitational center.
• Positioned exactly at: the measure would expose a perfect uniform result.
• The fact, says related physics, THAT this feature CONCURS with the Andromeda test result (AndromedaTest) — iterative gravitational redshift test on the g-centers of Milky and Andro based on available Doppler data — strongly suggests a strong and well relatable connection.
PolarizedCMB: NASAquoteCMB
New polarization data puts the former CMB data into Quest
MORE ABOUT (b)
THE GREAT SINE in PREFIXxSINE
By Quote:
UNIVERSE TODAY— Space and astronomy news ¦ not date stamped [ maybe 1311 ..] ¦ sampled 26Jan2023
” Unfortunately, there remains no explanation for what could be affecting the temperature of the CMB, but not its polarization. In this respect, the new analysis has provided new and important constraints on what these physics could be.”,
:
” So, the great mystery of the CMB anisotropies remains for the time being. And with the latest analysis unable to rule out new physics or other speculations, scientists and enthusiasts are free to keep venturing that these could be giant “cosmic bruises” caused by our Universe and others running into each other like a bunch of billiard balls.”,
UNIVERSE
TODAY— Space and astronomy news
The point: new polarization
data puts the former CMB data into Quest:
” Back in 2013, the European Space Agency released its first analysis of the data gathered by the Planck observatory. Between 2009 and 2013, this spacecraft observed the remnants of the radiation that filled the Universe immediately after the Big Bang – the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) – with the highest sensitivity of any mission to date and in multiple wavelengths.”,
:
” In addition to largely confirming current theories on how the Universe evolved, Planck’s first map also revealed a number of temperature anomalies – like the CMB “Cold Spot” – that are difficult to explain. Unfortunately, with the latest analysis of the mission data, the Planck Collaboration team has found no new evidence for these anomalies, which means that astrophysicists are still short of an explanation.”,
UNIVERSE TODAY— Space and astronomy
news
ExplainPolarizedCMB: PolarizedCMB
RELATED PHYSICS — same provisions — MIGHT suggest an
explaining solution:
Why affected Temperature but not its polarization?
The answer only works on huge portions of space, taken over long periods of
time ..
On the phenomena of Polarization: revealed by simple Kitchen
experimentation
ALONG WITH THE (LGD) DEDUCED GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT FUNDAMENTALS
COMPTON SCATTERING (Compton effect) normally works from shorter to longer light waves — provided sufficiently amounts of (reflecting — planar ¦ polarization foundation) mass meets the light path.
In related physics (The Andromeda test ¦ The SAND GRAIN Analogy ¦ Dark Matter Origin in Related Physics ¦ Universe’s Critical Density ¦ GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT — modern academic ”dark energy”) rich possibilities exist in giving principle explanations to such phenomena.
Galaxy center halos present special (Suns4) thermo nuclear radiation pressure physics for keeping the inner halos »clean from dust». It is (proportional to grain mass) pushed outwards by energy from the stars’ common thermo nuclear light production. These »outer dust walls» offer (excellent) opportunities for some general (greater, more common) cosmic radiation affections — type a possible polarization effect (more, the closer to the sensing instrument).
Meaning:
The closer the cosmic radiation approaches the measuring instrument, the higher degree of (such) polarization — Compton effect on the scale of millikelvin degrees producing longer waves (lower °K) from shorter ones (higher °K from further back in time: this is basic K-cell gravitational red shift mathematics, LGD, however not present in modern corridors).
So: filtering away anything BUT the (nearest) polarized cosmic background Planck heat radiation °K contributions, deletes/hides the older shorter waves on exposing newer polarized longer — hence more uniformly distributed ones. The not polarized measure still gravitationally red shifted, related physics says, disappears.
CaseClosed. Perfect Assembly (related physics says — if at all).
• Any IDEA claiming that a »MOTION through CMB generates Doppler effect» has absolutely no connection to related physics.
• CMB is a STAY.
• CMB is a thermodynamic equilibrium (very slowly decreasing).
• As the Sun’s light field is a (very constant) thermodynamical equilibrium to the planets.
So, the stated
”.. results from the motion of the Sun relative to the rest frame of the cosmic microwave background.”,
can no other RELATED meaning have than »relative the K-cell central gravity point»
— and which we already know is a completely meaningless concept in modern quarters.
Summing:
MODERN ACADEMY 1800+ MISSED THE TECHNOLOGICAL ONRAMP.
Say it: that is incorrect. Do show.
Instead, INSTRUMENTATION (1800+¦1820+) was developed by pioneers, experimentalists and the working populations, driving the real steel scientific development to progress. We, these results, if at all applicable, are standing on their shoulders.
CMBdetails ¦ ExplainPolarizedCMB
CosmoB: CosmoA
COMPELLING TNED EVIDENCE:
Solar Eclipses ¦ Multiple c ¦ The GPS Example ¦ Perihelion Precessions (THEcrFACTORS)
General Cosmic Equation (simple basic math — but deeply bullied in modern quarters)
expose, exemplifies, relates and compares on THAT
the theory of relativity is
»just a primitive invention OnDrift in using present
provable academic ignorance on real steel related natural physics
(AllKeplerMath) for synthesizing the mathematical gold out of the desert sand,
then claiming the primitive a supreme»
because, in fact, mathematics
HAS apparently proved to have
a »mind of its own» (AllKeplerMath),
whether we admit it or not — as,»the funny type», 5·8 + 18 = 58 no
matter how much we may rage — so that it Takes On Us, rides on Us, carries Us,
whether we want it to or Not
as exemplified
Equivalents are equivalents.
THE WAY IT WORKS:
Gm22/r = G(n→∞)m22/(n→∞)r ¦ CosmoA ¦ ComIN
by unknown never formulated reasons, academic literature has no mentioning of the rank’s equivalent
simple meaning: endless supply on limitless extension
although the concept is
frequently met in geometrical mathematics [ComIN].
• INVENTING (modern academy 1800+) a cosmological idea based on »limited mass» APPARENTLY AS DEDUCED
has blocked the entire natural mathematical and physical deduction
of the whole cosmological scene — unless someone can disclaim these rebelling statements:
The macrocosmic appearance m2(n→∞) — the TNED deduced cosmic central K-cell
The microcosmic appearance m2(n→∞)–1 — the TNED deduced Atomic Nucleus as The Planck Constant h=mcr, The Neutron (N3m20) or THE PLANCK RING with its
hf = h/(n→∞)
· f (n→∞)
and its corresponding Potential Barrier with its central Energy Zone: where Q is taken
(Spectrum and quantum numbers, The periodic system).
• SPECTRUM AND QUANTUM NUMBERS in atom-
and nuclear physics, and most definitely
• DEDUCING THE PERIOD SYSTEM (based on
simple Kepler area momentum resonances).
The 1800+ modern academic greatest contempt for these simple basics have several testified literature examples
• »the death of truth», Morris Kline 1968;
• Modern Academic Entropy Concept, »the death of God»:
— ”nothing lasts forever” — so, modern PhD:s: when does that end?
• we see a constant Drift of unproclaimed academic pissing contest on natural brains
(Read the literature — the general joy in modern quarters of killing classic physics).
The LIST gives further comparing examples between invented and deduced.
Compare modern academy on The Entropy Concept: no meaning.
— »IF that would be so, how come we didn’t get that from the start?».
Compare Related physics on The Entropy Concept: only meaning.
Same mathematical expression. A completely different interpretation.
Again: Compare AllKeplerMath versus Modern Academy.
HumanRight recognition. 24/7.
Children and animals handle it with excellence. Even birds: care. A Purpose.
Modern academy: Stop killing humanity.
DELPHI4Test2011
ämnesrubriker
innehåll
Föregående:
DELPHI4Test2011.htm — huvuddokument — HJÄLPDOKUMENT FÖR
DELPHI4Test2011
ThePerihelionPrecessions ¦ ExplainingCoriolisPrecession ¦ ThePoint
APPLICATIONS 1-4
Application1 — central acceleration
Application2 — gravitation law
Application3 — periodic system
Application4 — planetary perihelion
precessions
PerihelionPrecessionRotationalCenter
referenser
[HOP].
HANDBOOK OF PHYSICS, E. U. Condon, McGraw-Hill 1967 ¦ Compare
(minor) differences with CODATA (1995-2008)
Atomviktstabellen i HOP allmän
referens i denna presentation, Table 2.1 s9–65—9–86.
mn =
1,0086652u ...................... neutronmassan
i atomära massenheter (u) [HOP Table 2.1 s9–65]
me =
0,000548598u .................. elektronmassan
i atomära massenheter (u) [HOP Table 10.3
s7–155 för me , Table 1.4 s7–27 för u]
u = 1,66043 t27 KG .............. atomära massenheten [HOP Table 1.4 s7–27,
1967]
u = 1,66033
t27 KG .............. atomära massenheten [ENCARTA 99 Molecular
Weight]
u = 1,66041 t27 KG
............... atomära massenheten
[FOCUS MATERIEN 1975 s124sp1mn]
u = 1,66053886 t27 KG ........ atomära
massenheten [teknisk kalkylator, lista med konstanter SHARP EL-506W
(2005)]
u = 1,6605402 t27 KG .......... atomära
massenheten [@INTERNET (2007) sv. Wikipedia]
u = 1,660538782 t27
KG ...... atomära massenheten [från www.sizes.com],
CODATA
rekommendation från 2006 med toleransen ±0,000 000 083 t27 KG (Committe
on Data for Science and Technology)]
c0 = 2,99792458 T8 M/S ........ ljushastigheten
i vakuum [ENCARTA 99 Light, Velocity, (uppmättes i början på
1970-talet)]
h = 6,62559 t34 JS ................. Plancks konstant [HOP s7–155]
— Det internationella standardverket om universum sammanställt vid universitetet i Cambridge, The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Astronomy, London 1977.
[FM 2]. FOCUS MATERIEN 1975 [FM 1: FocusTekniken] — Fysikens, kemins och astronomins historia ¦ Allt från atomen till universum — fysik, kemi, jordvetenskap och astronomi
FOCUS UPPSLAGSBÖCKER STOCKHOLM
[BKL]. BONNIERS KONVERSATIONS LEXIKON, 12
band A(1922)-Ö(1928) med SUPPLEMENT A-Ö(1929) — STOCKHOLM ¦ ALBERT BONNIERS
FÖRLAG
t för 10–, T för 10+,
förenklade exponentbeteckningar
MAC, här ofta använd förkortning för Modern
ACademy — etablerad vetenskap
sedan början av 1800-talet
often used abbreviation here in UH for Modern ACademy 1800+
TNED — Related PHYSICS And MATHEMATICS —
Se särskild djupbeskrivning av innebörden i begreppet relaterad framställning.
(Toroid Nuclear Electromechanical Dynamics), eller Toroidnukleära Elektromekaniska
Dynamiken är den dynamiskt ekvivalenta resultatbeskrivning som
följer av härledningarna i Planckringen h=mnc0rn,
analogt Atomkärnans Härledning.
Beskrivningen enligt TNED är relaterad,
vilket innebär: alla, samtliga, detaljer gör anspråk på att vara fullständigt
logiskt förklarbara och begripliga, eller så inte alls. Med TNED förstås (således)
också
RELATERAD FYSIK OCH MATEMATIK. Se även uppkomsten av termen TNED i Atomkärnans Härledning.
SHORT ENGLISH —
TNED in general is not found @INTERNET except under this domain
(Universe[s]History, introduced @INTERNET 2008VII3).
TNED or Toroid
Nuclear Electromechanical Dynamics is the dynamically equivalent resulting
description following the deductions in THE PLANCK RING, analogous AtomNucleus’ Deduction. The
description according to TNED is related, meaning: all, each, details
claim to be fully logically explainable and understandable, or not at all. With
TNED is (hence) also understood RELATED PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS. See also the
emergence of the term TNED in AtomNucleus’ Deduction.
Senast uppdaterade version: 2023-07-14.
*END.
Stavningskontrollerat 2011-06-08.
*
DELPHI4Test2014MANUAL ·
√
∫ → ∞ τ π ħ ε UNICODE — ofta använda tecken
i matematiskt-tekniskt-naturvetenskapliga beskrivningar
σ
ρ ν ν π τ γ λ η ≠ √ ħ
ω → ∞ ≡
Ω
Φ Ψ Σ Π Ξ Λ Θ Δ
α
β γ δ ε λ θ κ π ρ τ φ
ϕ σ ω ϖ ∏ √ ∑ ∂ ∆ ∫
≤ ≈ ≥ ˂ ˃ ˂ ˃ ← ↑
→ ∞ ↓
ϑ
ζ ξ
Pilsymboler, direkt via tangentbordet: Alt+24 ↑; Alt+25
↓; Alt+26 →; Alt+27 ←; Alt+22 ▬
Alt+23
↨ — även Alt+18 ↕; Alt+29 ↔
DELPHI4Test2011.htm
Senast uppdaterade version: 14 juli
2023 | 12:56:19 | 2023-07-14. [GMT+1]Solar[GMT+2]Industry
Vidareutvecklat Från DELPHI 4 Test 2011 — DELPHI4Test2011ref.htm#AnvändningSupportInstallation
|
|
|
T2014Reg — HUVUDDELEN AV
VERKTYGEN MAN BEHÖVER FÖR AVANCERAD DATORANVÄNDNING I TEXT OCH BILD ¦ Jan2022
*