CHEOPS ATLAS Ļ GLACIATION — UNIVERSUMS HISTORIA — Nov2019  | a production 2020I1 | LastUpdated: 2024-03-25 ˇ Universums Historia Ļ HumanRight — a knowledge domain

 

 

innehåll content  denna sida ˇ webbSÖK äMNESORD på denna sida Ctrl+F ˇ sök ämnesord överallt i index SAKREGISTER  ˇ  förteckning  alla webbsidor all websites

NatCH Ļ CheopsATLAS-Begin Ļ CheopsATLAS-Pyramids Ļ CheopsATLAS-TNED Ļ CheopsAT Ļ Appendix ADDITION 10Jan2024:   Resolution 217 Ļ CALTEP  Ļ Course19th Ļ MENU Ļ PetriePlate9issues

RECOMMENDATION: DO NOT USE MICROSOFT AND GOOGLE WEB READERS HERE — THESE HAVE from 2015+ SMALL TEXT DIMMING FEATURES, DEROGATING — COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT — THE ORIGINAL TEXT.

USE SAFARI OR FIREFOX, OR OTHERS IF POSSIBLE: CLEAR, SHARP, EXACT. Enjoy,

 

Cheops Atlas Portal

THOUSANDS OF YEARS BACK FROM HERE some established sources claim, in some parts, a no-easy-

explainable glaciation history — only over the northern Earth part. THAT promotes a further GeoATLANTIS

investigation. We will try to illuminate those specific glaciation aspects in this CheopsATLAS appendage.

 

 

— Calling ATLANTIS .. ello .. ello ..  222 ..  333 ..   Ļ ATLANTIS Ļ GTursprunget2019 Ļ AtlantisAPPENDIX Ļ

 

 

— Roger .. Roger .. Mayday .. Mayday ..  A GEOATLANTIS might EXPLAIN some GLACIATION VARIATIONS — GeoATLANTIS NORTHERN HEMISPHERE GLACIATION VARIATIONS

 

 

 

By natural reasons — the rJCIRCLE complex — the glaciation aspects mentioned here have no representation in established quarters: the subject deals with ģunknown territoryģ.

 

 

With an appropriate geophysical land history, a POSSIBLE Geo Atlantis alternative seems plausible. But our most prominent critical question still is:

— Is such a geophysical history at all possible? Expert’s Answer not yet found.

 

 

This is:  A continuation from Sw.orig. CR2017 — with some broader examination of The GeoAtlantis alternative (14Dec2019).

 

 

•   Background.

•   CHEOPS PYRAMID EXPOSES A CONTRACTED CONSTRUCT: a provable precision building plan:

— From where?

 

RESULT:

— The urge to find a possible explanation has focused on a possible geographical early but (until a final collapse some perhaps 50 000 – 15 000 years ago) constantly continental drift fragmenting Atlantic land bridge between America and Africa-Europe.

 

 

 

In rough figures: Todays distance between America [Florida] and Africa-Europe shows on a world map roughly 0.12 M ˇ 50 T6 = 6 thousand kilometers. That makes a mean yearly average separation of the same 0.12 meters or 4.72441 inches per each year during the past 50 million years. That is [well] enough to crack, break and breach a thin fragile land mass — periodically — having established earlier through a primary volcanic eruption [periodically renewed through further volcanism] — as Iceland did but surviving on a more heat tolerant [ceramic] rocky ground: still going strong. The more southernly parts — ATLANTIS — ģdid not surviveģ. The possibility, if geophysically relevant, is the more interesting as the crucial period involves the first appearing humans on a full developed biological scale [fully rounded skulls, elastic and resilient Walk: The Woman as we know Her [The Nature Form no born man can resist]: The Pearl of our Universe].

 

 

 

— Reports claiming enigmatic glaciation events over the past amount of some thousand years only over the northern hemisphere has exaggerated the urge of testing, as these reports obviously promote a possible early Geo Atlantic land region: during a geological period, opening and closing the North Atlantic Current with following consequences.

— We will study some quotes on these reports in this presentation — eventually trying to exclude weak associations.

 

 

 

ATLANTIS CHEOPS:

 

ATLANTIS CHEOPS — or a Cheops ATLAS seems about to be revealed in its entirety

IF the following geological parts do have a solid physical ground.

A continuing with further examination of the GeoAtlantis alternative (14Dec2019)

 

GEOLOGICAL GLACIATION VARIATION DATA [GGVD] SUPPORTS AND FAVORS THE GEO ATLANTIS ALTERNATIVE

GEOLOGICAL GLACIATION DATA PROMOTE AND SUPPORT THE GEO ATLANTIS ALTERNATIVE [GGVD]

DEEPENED ARGUMENTATION — North Atlantic Current washes away ev. Atlantic artifacts by time

 

Established sources point out that MANY glaciation periods have occurred during the Earth’s surface geological history.

 

We only have to focus on the part in concern of the introduction

(400–200–50 Ma) of the the so called continental drift, schematically illustrated below.

 

— Roughly 200 Ma America Africa-Europe begins to separate. That introduces us to the actual Geo ATLANTIS alternative (Sw. Geo ATLANTIS alternativet), how it started in any possible true geological scenario.

 

More closely there is a (known, in parts) 3 Ma reference specifying the beginning of the latest (great) glaciation period (conv., the Quaternary Glaciation). Its possible extension can be used here as an illustrating base, as its geology is claimed to be well documented.

   See in explicit the MaMap.

 

 

 

A corresponding GIF-animated WorldMap evolving sequence

— Ma, abbreviated from Million years ago

— fairly similar to the below, left part America-AfricaEurope only — is found @Internet on the website

https://gifer.com/en/7NOj

 

The illustrated parts summarizes the introduction to the continuing and testing investigation of the Geo ATLANTIS alternative: Its eventual connection to our physical reality. See further quotations in GGVD and IcyNORTH.

 

 

IF THE Geo ATLANTIS alternative has a real geophysical foundation

— a thin volcanic rebuilding-fragmenting America-Africa-Europe continental forcing barrier form — it ought to expose a significant influence on the streaming of oceanic water between equator and north pole.

— What the established sources sensationally say:

No south pole. Only north.

The affected part is only over the north part.

— It fits our Geo Alternative as the hand in the glove.

 

What has been reported (-Dec2019):

— Only exclusively (unique, some mysterious and strange, hard to explain oceanic) glacial variations appear over the north hemisphere — earliest from the beginning of the America- Africa-Europe continental drift (400-200 Ma). See further quotes in GGVD.

 

Known test period from 3Ma

We have — through already well established sources — one reference at ca 3Ma (Ma, Million years ago),

 

Sw. ” Istiden började för omkring tre miljoner år sedan, men glaciärerna har bara avancerat då och då och de har aldrig nått längre än till tempererade breddgrader.”, CG1984s28.

Eng.

The ice-age began about three million years ago, but the glaciers have only advanced now and then and have never reached further than temperated zones.

 

Same type of specification exists on Wikipeida (Quaternary glaciation, 10Dec2019) dated beginning 2.58 Ma, part of illustration below.

 

Ma, Million years ago — Agif

 

 

The World Map above illustrates a corresponding — possible — picture of a Geo Atlantis Alternative. The known period around 3 Ma is marked with blue for its (Wikipedia, Quaternary glaciation) ice cover. See further described and illustrated in GGVD with quotes.

— The testing form suggests a corresponding geologically — possible — evolving scenario in the land formation phase history.

 

 

Geo Atlantis Alternative’s suggested conditions, its formation on a specifically thin Earth crust (200—50Ma) — contrary to its spouse Iceland who survived the continental drift on a more heat resisting rocky ground with less dramatic drift — has extraordinary qualities in explaining the otherwise mysterious fast and vast northern hemisphere variations in glaciation: early seismic fragmentation on an early Atlantic fragile land form fed by a powerful continental drift, partly rebuilding new land through continuing volcanism.  Today this volcanic activity has slowed down, now mostly active at sea bottoms several kilometers deep under the ocean surface.

   See citation in GGVD.

When the land formation finally ceases, and the North Atlantic Current establishes its streaming route, (0,015—0,011 Ma), all previous fragments and traces of that land at the bottom of the the Atlantic ocean is rinsed away by the ticking seconds of time. Not a The F Word single trace of any Atlantis.

— But: is that scenario really geologically possible? No certain answer to that question is known here.

 

 

AtlantisCHEOPS Ļ AgifRef Ļ MaKartan 

 

IcyNorth: GGVD Ļ FAN

 

— The enigmatic fast changes in glaciation periods only over the northern hemisphere, nothing over the southern parts.

IcyNORTH

” The abrupt climate changes that occurred during the last glaciation and deglaciation

are mind boggling both in terms of rapidity and magnitude.”, Seager2007a.

 

 

 

 

This GeoATLANTIS TEST encourages the enigmatically stated fast and strong variations inside the latest known glaciation periods.

 

 

Evolving scene:

 

 

Ma, Million years ago

 

 

If, during some geological period, a geological DOOR once existed between America and Africa-Europe

— seismically partly fragmenting from continental separation, partly rebuilding through volcanic activity

— it could explain the reported strange (enigmatic, mysterious) glaciation fast and vast changes in the nearest past.

 

 

 

 

Several describing articles (@INTERNET) are available explaining how the North Atlantic Current

(Wikipedia @INTERNET and others: North Atlantic Current)

is affecting the north pole’s ice growth or decline. Citations with references below.

 

 

SURFACE AREA CORRECT MAP PROJECTION OF EARTH GLOBE.

Antarctic (South pole) not included. Sequences schematically only in left map part, its continental drift America-Africa-Europe earliest 400 Ma, Million years ago.

 

 

If we hypothetically include a South pole Antarctic land in the leftmost picture, we have an Earth globe divided approximately in one part 50% land and one part 50% open and isolated ocean: equatorial oceanic current streaming is closed, no opening exists. While water conserves/transports the daily insolation heat better than rock around the World, a possible primary first glaciation period could have developed over both pole hemispheres with the early Earth land Passage Closed alternative:

— Mostly 24/7 a closed water basin on the water equatorial side: Mostly icy on the (northern) land side. But no further information of that scenario is known here.

— Later, with the Atlantic Continental Drift, the situation changes — also depending on smaller land bridges (Mexico, Alaska-Siberia) being opened or closed for water currents.

 

 

With our GeoATLANTIS alternative still under test

(earliest from America-Africa-Europe continental drift’s beginning [400–200 Ma, Million years ago])

it renders easy to see a possible random geological servo process of a corresponding ice growth or ice decline over the north pole (whole northern hemisphere).

 

See also in FUNCTION.

 

 

 

Depending on whether the passage America-Africa-Europe is maximized open or closed

— GeoAtlantis alternative seismic geological fragmenting and volcanic redressing during some period

— a momentary growth or decline of ice is seen over the north pole region.

   An open passage encourages warm incoming equatorial ocean water.

   A closed passage blocks the warm, and consequently encourages a colder period.

 

GeoAtlantis alternative — if at all geologically possible — gives us (climatologically) an explaining candidate in a historical window of at least 50 Ma.

— That is also the most recent period of the whole and complete and full biological human body physiological development into the form of the human such as it is known by us today: woman as The example. Can’t beat that. She takes the breath out of us all: the human form as such. Absolute harmonic beauty on a full universal cosmic scale.

 

None of the sources (@INTERNET) exposing the glaciation enigmatic ”mind boggling” history contain any mentioning of these here hinted Geo Atlantis aspects, as it is known here. The general established idea seems to be that the Atlantic continental drift simply and directly has promoted and shaped a continuous growing oceanic opening between the two continental plate sites America and Africa-Europe-Asia — and no mentioning of even a possibility of a connecting geology. Not even a hint.

 

 

In summation: The partly interesting spot in the available descriptions of the glaciation periods

(the foremost known by the ice core samples) is the enigmatic part of the  mentioning:

— Apparently completely mysterious onsets show: (improbable) fast changes occur in ice growth (and decline). That is a sweet and real opportunity for a Geo Atlantic fragmenting volcanic refreshing geology servo motor, capable of giving a (fast) opening and a (fast) shutdown — as a door between warm and cold.

— And so, apparently as it is claimed, only over the northern part of our globe.

 

NorthAtlanticGlaciationQuotes: IcyNORTH

CHALLENGES TO OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE GENERAL CIRCULATION: ABRUPT CLIMATE CHANGE

Richard Seager and David S. Battisti, Chapter 12 — April 5, 2007

http://ocp.ldeo.columbia.edu/res/div/ocp/pub/seager/Seager_Battisti_2007.pdf

:

” 12.10. Conclusions

The abrupt climate changes that occurred during the last glaciation and deglaciation

are mind boggling both in terms of rapidity and magnitude.”,

:

” That winters in the British Isles could switch between mild, wet ones very similar to today and ones in which winter temperatures dropped to as much as 20◦ C below freezing, and do so in years to decades, is simply astounding.”,

:

-------------------------

” 12.1. Introduction

About 14,700 years ago (14.7 kyr BP), towards the end of the last ice age, the climate

warmed dramatically and abruptly around the North Atlantic—by as much as the

difference between full glacial and interglacial conditions—in no more than a decade

or two.”,

-------------------------

:

” This is all the more remarkable because it occurred in the presence of massive

ice sheets and continuation of the albedo forcing that presumably had been helping

maintain glacial conditions up to that point.”,

:

” Broecker et al. (1985) were perhaps the first to suggest that rapid warmings and coolings of climate around the North Atlantic were caused by rapid switchings on and off of North Atlantic Deep Water formation with “on” states being associated with transport of warm waters into the subpolar North Atlantic.”,

” Despite difficulties explaining the paleoclimate record of abrupt changes with the THC theory, no competing idea has yet been offered.”, Seager2007a.

 

These statements WOULD associate nearest to an AMAZING (possible GeoAtlantis) COINCIDENCE. The continued flow of water during (the nearest 10 000) years (with oceanic sea floor geological sedimentation and continued continental drift with its ocean floor volcanic activity) has effectively wiped out and away any possible traces: No F Atlantis.

 

” More recently, the greening of the Sahara in the mid-Holocene,

when the worlds most impressive desert essentially became a moist savanna, remains a

fascinating unexplained phenomenon. Certainly it was triggered by orbital changes that

increase summer insolation over the northern hemisphere, but the apparently abrupt

onset and demise of the African Humid Period (deMenocal et al. 2000), and the fact that

other Northern Hemisphere monsoon regions show less impressive changes, suggest a

nonlocal coupling between deserts and monsoons on paleoclimate time scales that is

waiting to be elucidated.”,

:

” In summary, abrupt climate changes, consisting of coolings followed by rapid

coolings and then abrupt warmings, punctuated the entire glacial period at Greenland,

but no such thing happened in Antarctica. At Greenland, there is enticing evidence of

nonlinearity of the climate system with thresholds and switches.”, Seager2007a.

 

Wikipedia (14Dec2019) has the same type of North Atlantic Current consensus — with an underlined common idea of an unbroken Atlantic passage:

 

WIKIPEDIA, QUATERNARY GLACIATION

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternary_glaciation

:

” An important component in the development of long-term ice ages is the positions of the continents.[16] These can control the circulation of the oceans and the atmosphere, affecting how ocean currents carry heat to high latitudes. Throughout most of geologic time, the North Pole appears to have been in a broad, open ocean that allowed major ocean currents to move unabated. Equatorial waters flowed into the polar regions, warming them. This produced mild, uniform climates that persisted throughout most of geologic time.”,

:

” But during the Cenozoic Era, the large North American and South American continental plates drifted westward from the Eurasian plate. This interlocked with the development of the Atlantic Ocean, running north-south, with the North Pole in the small, nearly landlocked basin of the Arctic Ocean.”,

:

” The Drake passage opened 33.9 million years ago (the Eocene-Oligocene transition), severing Antarctica from South America. The Antarctic Circumpolar Current could then flow through it, isolating Antarctica from warm waters and triggering the formation of its huge ice sheets.”,

:

” The Isthmus of Panama developed at a convergent plate margin about 2.6 million years ago, and further separated oceanic circulation, closing the last strait, outside the polar regions, that had connected the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans.[17]”,

:

” This increased poleward salt and heat transport, strengthening the North Atlantic thermohaline circulation, which enough supplied moisture to arctic latitudes to create the northern glaciation.[18]”,

:

” Thick glaciers were heavy enough to reach the sea bottom in several important areas, thus blocking the passage of ocean water and thereby affecting ocean currents. In addition to direct effects, this caused feedback effects as ocean currents contribute to global heat transfer.”,

:

” Glaciation has been a rare event in Earth's history,[28] but there is evidence of widespread glaciation during the late Paleozoic Era (300 to 200 Ma) and the late Precambrian (i.e. the Neoproterozoic Era, 800 to 600 Ma).[29] Before the current ice age, which began 2 to 3 Ma, Earth's climate was typically mild and uniform for long periods of time.”,

:

” The warming trend following the Last Glacial Maximum, since about 20,000 years ago, has resulted in a sea level rise by about 130 metres. This warming trend has subsided about 6,000 years ago, and sea level has been comparatively stable since the Neolithic.”,

:

” The present interglacial period (the Holocene) has been fairly stable and warm, but the previous one was interrupted by numerous cold spells lasting hundreds of years.”, WikiQuater.

 

Holocene:

WIKIPEDIA, QUATERNARY GLACIATION

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternary_glaciation

:

” Currently, Earth is in an interglacial period, which marked the beginning of the Holocene epoch. The current interglacial began between 15,000 and 10,000 years ago; this caused the ice sheets from the last glacial period to begin to disappear. Remnants of these last  glaciers, now occupying about 10% of the world’s land surface, still exist in Greenland, Antarctica and some mountanious regions.”

 

Sahara (18Dec2019):

WIKIPEDIA, AFRICAN HUMID PERIOD

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_humid_period

:

 

Africa — SAHARA — geologically mapped ca 7 000 ya

 

” The African humid period (AHP) is a climate period in Africa during the Holocene during which northern Africa was wetter than today. It .. involved changes in vegetation and dust in the Sahara that altered the African monsoon, the disappearance of much of the Sahara desert which was replaced by grassy vegetation, trees and lakes and the settlement of the former desert by various animals and humans, who lived as hunter-gatherers. It has had profound effects on present-day Africa such as the birth of the Pharaonic civilization and the pyramids and potentially also the development of widespread Golden Age myths.”,

 

CONCLUSIVE ASSOCIATION WITHOUT FURTHER PROOF:

— ģThe Pyramids Came About when Sahara was Greenģ.

(Wikipedia increases the odds).

See also NatCH.

 

NOTE24Feb2024: UPDATED ORIGINAL —  2017+

Additional note 245Feb2024 — the Conclusive above:

With the updated (RadioCarbonDating on the Cheops Pyramid mortar) information in CALTEP, the enigmatic and troublesome ”The Cheops Pyramid before 3000 BC” argument is not valid anymore.

 

(And neither is ģthe enigmatic emigrationģ of the hypothetic Atlantis population).

A sudden (everything explained) breakthrough has been exposed:

— ģa seemingly full and complete consequential mathematical explanationģ .

 

BASIC ARGUMENT as exposed from Appendix in this presentation:

— No way the level of physics and mathematics explaining (TNED) the Cheops Pyramid building and its interior was present in the early primitive human civilizations, the way these are known and interpreted in present history books.

 

Full explanation in Resolution 217

ALL THE PREVIOUS PRESENTATIONS IN this CHEOPS ATLAS document series complex (2017+) suffer the same consequential mathematics forced resolution:

 

On a necessary Earth ground Bound Hi Tech Atlantis culture — which fragmented .. leaving us in utter ignorance on explaining the history behind ..

 

— ģthe Pyramids, Cheops Pyramid and others, already stood there at the present established literary typically testified (CameronREF) sudden birth of the Egyptian civilization, around some 3000 BCģ.

 

— THAT was (what made the lock in) the enigmatic Quest which cannot be explained in detail:

— How, where.

— It had to be implied: unanswered.

   Now (Feb2024) we are facing a new situation (the Radiocarbon dated Cheops Pyramid masonry mortar: it contains organic rests, dated farthest 2 900 BC).

 

— Our basic (fatal) idea that a (necessary, but never proven as such) High Tech Atlantis civilization was, had to be with no argumentation at all, Earth ground bound and based (consequential mathematics), was — until now — a fatal idea hiding the true consequential mathematical answer (now clarified from the Wikipedia article detail Radiocarbon dating on the Cheops Pyramid mortar content — not earlier noted in this production).

   Namely:

— The possibility — hi tech principally free energy — to be independent of Earth geological changes: building airborne (huge) platforms from where a more elegant and stable organization — during longer periods — could be managed.

 

Bonus: all history explained. Every atom of it. TEST IT — down to the last atom.

 

— Why didn’t we think of that simple and most elegant consequential mathematics solution and explanation from the start?

 

— ģThe authors don’t like heights very muchģ. There is always a trivial reason.

— Because there was no known argument stopping us from building on the idea of a permanent Earth ground culture — with all its enigmatic unanswered questions.

— What broke the ice?

— The Wikipedia passage (not earlier observed) of the radiocarbon dating: the mortar used in the stone masonry of the Cheops Pyramid. It contains rests from organic (ashes) material — dated at most latest 2 900 BC. That kills every available suggested idea that ģthe Pyramids already stood there, a long, long time agoģ. Then the whole history becomes consequentially explained. All the way, all details of the puzzle: TRY TO BREAK IT DOWN.

— The technological knowledge is the old aspect. Not the Pyramid as such.

   To be corrected if faulty.

   See full scenery explanation from RADIOCARBON DATING.

 

 

— No way the level of physics and mathematics explaining the Cheops Pyramid building and its interior, as it is (2017+) presented in this CheopsATLAS series documents, was present in the early primitive human civilizations. The way these are known and interpreted in present history books have absolutely no connection. No way. So, to conclude on consequential mathematics, what we know:

 

 

Reminding the necessary technological level (TNED familiarity: EARTHrJCIRCLE mathematics and physics):

—————————————————————————————————

ASSUMING AND TAKING FOR GRANTED that the Atlantic original region DID fragment as is suggested in these Glaciation view arguing statements, the Atlan population soon realized this (on an already established confirmed TNED deduced hi tech free mc˛ energy ATA/CAT foundation THE GAMMA PROJECT [still Mar2024: no direct electronic-instrumental gamma proof on the table, yet. But it is only a matter of time until it comes. And when it does, the world will most certainly change, fast ..] — deduced nuclear physics, proving and explaining present academia as a Primitive — because it invented on consensus instead of deducing on knowledge: consensus is not a scientific subject, but knowledge is):

 

— If we are not to get shredded ourselves in time by millennia intervals by this fragile local Earth geological structure, and our technological culture as well, we have to build (huge) airborne plant platforms, having these as stationary offices high above Earth ground, and thereby independent of Earth ground geology changes over millennia.

— From there, we can organize — better — our future civilization, taking advantage of the most favorable sites at Earth ground, with stations for food and material supplements, and some stationary settlements, for those of us who so wish.

Such a perspective is readily out of question in the present Earth world academic primitive idea of the atomic and nuclear physics: no way. Not even close.

 

 

A NEW SCENE — the number of humans on Earth say some 10 000 BC was what we know small

———————————————————————————————————————

The Atlans BUILT and emigrated — to (HUGE) Airborne Tech (with many smaller migration ships, frequently visiting Earth ground stations: food, material and general maintenance). So: Their civilization was never (ultimately) destroyed by any at all a geological catastrophe — although the original land sites would have to meet such a fate. The Atlans gradually ģvaporizedģ — and became smoothly and perfectly undetected integrated in time with the rest of the human very much less intellectually developed civilization sites — however on the condition of their level: no force, no violence (non Atlantic populations: comparatively slow mental evolution/awakening, and so during [many] millennia — that seems to be a necessary puzzle: fairly comparable to the present academia and its idea of such a level of knowledge: retarded, low educated: not possible at all, no way, not even close)

— The most interesting: FIND an argument to disclaim all this found and revealed.

   None yet found. Still searching.

 

 

Provided the Atlans themselves did not start civil wars and hopeless disputes, such a hi tech culture would in principle last forever (until the Sun dies).

— It would need a one human family consciousness in full awareness of the situation.

   And that is the problem of our time: state administrative human right recognition:

   Not one word. Not a spell. Not a sound. No daily talk: Nobody talks it.

   ” They are endowed with reason and conscience ..”, A1 UDHR10Dec1948.

— Oh yeah .. Exemplified where? UN: Just give us one example.

   Cannot handle civilization. Cannot handle life. Cannot handle communication.

   Human right recognition: suspended. A prison for humanity.

   World wide state persecution of violence refusers. Very high tech. MustBuyBook.

   Very educated, high level IQ.

   If any of these aces enter a store, the merchandise shows tendency of going out.

   Retarded, is an upgrade. Disclaim.

 

 

— What happened to their hi tech energy science, and its shipments, what became of these, and (above all), why the reason to build Pyramids (around 3 000 BC) and how would all of it be rationally and logically explained in a left Explaining Script?

— See the suggested Consequential Mathematics Scenery explanation in the following appendix from RADIOCARBON DATING.

   And so it is — now, finally — possible to explain the (entire ancient) history on that premise. See further in the following appendix from RADIOCARBON DATING.

Editor2024II29

 

 

IcyNORTH  Ļ NorthAtlanticGlaciationQuotes Ļ Seager2007a Ļ WikiQuater Ļ InterGlac100 Ļ WikiHolo Ļ WikiSahara Ļ NOTE24Feb2024

 

FAN: Ļ sw. fördjupad argumentering Ļ Function

 

 

NORTHERN HEMISPHERE GLACIATION VARIATIONS

INTENSIFIED EXPLANATION

 

SHORT ENGLISH:

 

— IF the GeoAtlantis Bridge alternately on its (here for further test) presumed primary thin Earth crust is (seismically due to The Continental Drift, TCD) fragmenting and partly (for some time) recovering from the ocean bottom volcanism, then also a ”door” sometimes is open and sometimes is closed to the North Pole — regulating the flow of warm equatorial ocean water:

 

   RANDOM (short time) glaciation regulation occurs, together with a ”wash-out” of previous remnants and sediments on the actual GeoAtlantis (former) land base. [But this scenario must be confirmed by geological experts, if valid].

   With this possible scenario, the late findings 0.011Ma (CG1984) of elephant teeth on North America’s east coast need NOT to be the (here) earlier stated absolute MARKER of ”a latest possible GeoAtlantis” existence (as [such] Atlantis artifacts have not been found [at all] on the Atlantic ocean floor).

   This (enhanced) alternative gives us a better (more profitable) margin to test and relate a possibly Late GeoAtlantis populated crew MUCH CLOSER to our own time than ”no nearer than 0.050Ma to give ģmarginsģ”.

   If this holds, we are better equipped to relate the historical gaps between the different possible stages.

 

 

All here collected quotations from Wikipedia on Glaciation mentions, and underlines, the (vital) role of the North Atlantic Current (NAC) — left upper dark blue extending from the Gulf Stream. NAC is the main Transit Route of warmer equatorial sun heated water upwards towards the North Pole. As far as the Atlantic passage is OPEN, this North Pole warm incoming water guarantees that any existing ice reduces to a minimum.

— However in these browsed articles, it is not even hinted at, nor mentioned as a possibility, that a possible land-bridge (The GeoAtlantis Alternative) — if at all present — SHOULD function as a North Pole GLACIATION Regulator — to and fro, depending on extension.

— The GeoAtlantis Alternative poses such an alternative, however as yet not verified as a real geological possibility other than exposed in this presentation: primarily created 200-50 Ma (Ma, Million years from now) on thin crust by volcanic activity — a fragile spouse to the more solid ICELAND alternative — from the beginning of The Continental Drift (TCD). TCD guarantees that any America-AfricaEurope build up on a thin crust will be seismically shredded by time, and in different (random) outbursts, with a possible ongoing recovery from new volcanic out-fills, see right part of the illustration above.

   We would very much like to know if there are any kind or sort of strictly geological arguments to refute such a possibility — because IF the possibility is geologically valid (traces washed away), it also COULD be a perfect explanation to what today is perfectly shredded and lost a long time ago: Atlantis.

 

 

WIKIPEDIA, Gulf stream

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_Stream

” The Gulf Stream influences the climate of the east coast of North America from Florida to Newfoundland, and the west coast of Europe.”,

” Although there has been recent debate, there is consensus that the climate of Western Europe and Northern Europe is warmer than it would otherwise be due to the North Atlantic drift which is the northeastern section of the Gulf Stream. It is part of the North Atlantic Gyre.”.

 

 

DeTiLi: FAN

DEVELOPING TIME LINE

— All traces gone from nearest 15 000 years back.

 

 

ASSUMING The Geo Atlantic Door South-North finally became fully opened

— no more volcanic rebuilding of obstructing land between the continent sites America and Africa-Europe

— it will be easy for us to see a most flashing prominent geological effect:

 

Every piece of information from a previous land

— which occasionally sunk to the ocean bottom from tearing seismic continental drift mechanics

— will be rinsed and cleaned away northerly by the continuous water current.

 

 

 

 

 

With — nearest — a period of 10 000 to 15 000 years of such open North Atlantic oceanic current flow, we would expect that nothing, not a smallest trace, will be found on the Atlantic ocean bottom from a possible early real existing geological land form. It is all gone, washed away and fragmented and sea eroded. If remnants still exist, we would look for them at the continental edges: the only geological and geophysical places excluded from the south-north pushing and rinsing water currents.

 

This Finally Atlantic Opened Door possibility — provided the Geo Atlantis alternative holds geophysically — gives us a most close possible time line to set out for the absolute — to our own time closest — remnants of an original Atlantic culture: no closer than say 15 000 years back.

   The findings of elephant teeth [CGsource] at the northern coast of North America dated farthest 15 000 years back

— with our first simple critical argument: if these were Atlantic, elephant teeth would be found all over the Atlantic ocean floor

— will lose all argue-mental power in aiming at ”why then are there no elephant teeth all over the Atlantic floor”:

— Because of the simple fact that these have had just about 15 000 years to be washed away from the site, due to the North Atlantic Washing Away Every Possible Trace Current.

   So:

— Our search for a NEAREST ORIGIN (of whatever more profound) will and can, have the time line as a first set out: No more close to our own time than roughly 15 000 years back.

 

 

FAN Ļ  DEVELOPING TIME LINE 

 

 

GEOLOGICAL GLACIATION VARIATION DATA [GGVD]:

IcyNORTH Ļ NortOnly Ļ Function Ļ FAN

THE REMARKABLE HERE IS THAT the nearest to our time CHANGE SHOULD HAVE OCCURRED RATHER SUDDENLY  about 14 000 years ago: the glaciation on the northern hemisphere decreases and is reduced drastically over a shorter time.

— See also with quoting references in Seager2007a.

 

Warmer water from Equator reduces a colder North — no actual news

WIKIPEDIA, Gulf stream

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_Stream

” The Gulf Stream influences the climate of the east coast of North America from Florida to Newfoundland, and the west coast of Europe.”,

” Although there has been recent debate, there is consensus that the climate of Western Europe and Northern Europe is warmer than it would otherwise be due to the North Atlantic drift which is the northeastern section of the Gulf Stream. It is part of the North Atlantic Gyre.”.

 

Our Quest:

— If

— over thousands of years in the earlier younger Earth geological history

— there is a holding-stopping-locking-let-go geologically dynamic barrier belt across the America-Africa-Europe Atlantic ocean

— ongoing geological fragmentation with volcanic recreation

— the continental drift works as a tension dragging machine tearing any eventually earlier formed volcanic land seismically apart

— partly reforming from new volcanic activity (compare the new island Surtsey outside Iceland in 1963), during some geological period,

— there is also, or should also be provisional conditions for a Northern Atlantic Current to CHANGE

— fluctuate

— over same time periods:

— Warmer equatorial water sometimes penetrates and sometimes not the northern polar regions.

   THEN:

— The reported mysteriously fast and vast changes over shorter periods receives an explanation.

 

 

 

” The abrupt climate changes that occurred during the last glaciation and deglaciation

are mind boggling both in terms of rapidity and magnitude.", Seager2007.

 

”simply astounding”

GEOLOGICAL GLACIATION VARIATION DATA

 

 

WIKIPEDIA, TIMELINE OF GLACIATION (14Dec2019)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_glaciation

:

” There have been five or six major ice ages in the history of Earth over the past 3 billion years. The Late Cenozoic Ice Age began 34 million years ago, its latest phase being the Quaternary glaciation, in progress since 2.58 million years ago.”,

:

” Within ice ages, there exist periods of more severe glacial conditions and more temperate referred to as glacial periods and interglacial periods, respectively. The Earth is currently in such an interglacial period of the Quaternary glaciation, with the last glacial period of the Quaternary having ended approximately 11,700 years ago, the current interglacial being known as the Holocene epoch.[1] Based on climate proxies, paleoclimatologists study the different climate states originating from glaciation.”, WikiTimeGlac.

 

Geological proofs of rapid and large changes in glaciation (icing) 0.0147 Ma ”is simply astounding”:

Seager2007:

ABRUPT CLIMATE CHANGE

CHALLENGES TO OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE GENERAL CIRCULATION,

Richard Seager and David S. Battisti, April 5, 2007

http://ocp.ldeo.columbia.edu/res/div/ocp/pub/seager/Seager_Battisti_2007.pdf

:

"12.10. Conclusions

The abrupt climate changes that occurred during the last glaciation and deglaciation

are mind boggling both in terms of rapidity and magnitude.",

:

" That winters in the British Isles could switch between mild, wet ones very similar to today and ones in which winter temperatures dropped to as much as 20◦ C below freezing, and do so in years to decades, is simply astounding.",

:

" No state-of-the-art climate model, of the kind used to project future climate change within the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change process, has ever produced a climate change like this.",

:

" 12.1. Introduction

About 14,700 years ago (14.7 kyr BP), towards the end of the last ice age, the climate

warmed dramatically and abruptly around the North Atlantic—by as much as the

difference between full glacial and interglacial conditions—in no more than a decade

or two.",

:

" This is all the more remarkable because it occurred in the presence of massive

ice sheets and continuation of the albedo forcing that presumably had been helping

maintain glacial conditions up to that point. But it was not to last.",

:

" Sometime just after 13 kyr BP this Bølling-Allerød warm period ended as climate first cooled, and then abruptly cooled, into the so-called Younger Dryas. As near-glacial conditions returned, glaciers advanced in Europe, and the forests that had established themselves in the preceding warm epoch died. The Younger Dryas ended with a second abrupt warming that occurred over only a decade or so and that shifted temperatures back to those of the Holocene and of today.",

:

" The idea that the climate system goes through such abrupt shifts did not take the

climate research community by storm but dribbled into acceptance in the 1980s and

the early 1990s. Only when duplicate ice cores said the same thing and the evidence was

found in multiple indicators within the ice—oxygen isotopes, dust concentrations, snow

accumulation, and so on—and could be correlated with terrestrial and marine records

did acceptance that abrupt climate change was a reality sink in.",

:

" This gradual acceptance is telling. When Hays et al. (1976) showed just how well

climate records from deep-sea cores could be matched to orbital cycles, it was deeply

satisfying: ..",

:

" Three decades later we are still far from understanding how orbital changes are

converted into ice-sheet growth and decay. While this is testimony enough to our limited

understanding of the climate system and general circulation, abrupt climate change is

now the star witness. In this case, the climate changes occurred not only abruptly but,

apparently, in the absence of any external forcing. The lack of any theory for how such

changes could occur helps explain the slow acceptance of what the data were saying.",

SEAGER2007.

 

Function: GGVD Ļ MaMap

 

Established theory seems to have no — not even a hint mentioned — theory comparable in caliber of The GeoAtlantis Alternative:

— A geological fragile America-Africa-Europe formation, partly fragmenting from The Continental Drift (TCD), and partly (less) recovering from underneath by Atlantic volcanic activity:

— Disappearing totally in the length of time.

   IT does have a principle — principal, main — physical geological potential of partly blocking and partly allowing a The North Atlantic Current to pass

— or be blocked further north.

   If so:

— The reported (mysterious, enigmatic) fast glaciation changes explained.

 

 

 

When The Passage finally ends (DEVELOPING TIME LINE)

— its partly volcanic recovering land form geological time period ceases

— its remnants (The Continental Drift seismically shredded [mud, sediments])

on the Atlantic oceanic bottom effectively is transported away northerly by the current streaming.

— Traces are wept out. The northern water current effectively hides away any trace of any possible former land shape or its eventual artifacts: no F Atlantis.

 

NorthOnly:

Only the northern hemisphere:

 

" In the two decades since the discovery of abrupt change, two advances have been

made.", SEAGER2007;

:

" First, the spatial pattern of abrupt climate change has been better delimited, and

it is now known that these events occurred essentially synchronously across much of

the Northern Hemisphere (including the northern Tropics) within the atmosphere, the

surface ocean, and the deep ocean.",

:

" Abrupt changes are not found in the ice records from Antarctica, and the Southern Hemisphere remains a question because of limited data. These spatial patterns place some severe constraints on proposed mechanisms of abrupt climate change.",

:

" Second, mechanisms have been advanced that revolve around the thermohaline circulation (THC). Broecker et al. (1985) were perhaps the first to suggest that rapid warmings and coolings of climate around the North Atlantic were caused by rapid switchings on and off of North Atlantic Deep Water formation with “on” states being associated with transport of warm waters into the subpolar North Atlantic.",

:

" Despite difficulties explaining the paleoclimate record of abrupt changes with the THC theory, no competing idea has yet been offered.",

SEAGER2007.

 

GGVD Ļ WikiTimeGlac Ļ Seager2007 Ļ Function Ļ NorthOnly

 

Ma, Million years ago Ļ GEOLOGICAL SCENERY

 

 

NotedFACTS

 

AppendixResolution217: Mathematical — as the 1883 Flinders Petrie Cheops Pyramid Cheops Rectangle Golden Section Matrix System provable Solution; Forensic — on the origin of human history civilization: UDHR10Dec1948; 

 

 

CAN CONSEQUENTIAL MATHEMATICS [COMA] EXPLAIN OUR ENTIRE HUMAN HISTORY ON PLANET EARTH?  The will of the people .. Additional NOTE24Feb2024

Resolution 217 — GS Golden Section Matrix Systems Solutions — with Earth radius CIRCLE on neutron Dmax density and present mass —  defines the [1881] Petrie measured Cheops Pyramid half base 4534.40’’ with a 99.9999832% precision: ģResolution 217ģ. The Mi-UNIT Ļ CalculatingThePetrieMeasures Ļ GoldenSectionMatrixSYSTEM 

Appendix ADDITION 10Jan2024: ReadITandWEEP: Explained in Resolution 217 — 4Ļ9JAN2024 — CheopsAtlasTNED additions

 

Universe History Content — in a short summation (4Mar2024)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

NEUTRON SQUARE — Planck constant calculating atomic masses outclasses modern academic atomic and nuclear theory

ALL KEPLER MATH — proving, comparing and certifying that relativity theory blocks the understanding of physics

CWON from CAP — Earth crust isotopic composition with Atmos Bios Litos: the 10 biological equivalents

PO4 — world laboratory institutions: perform a mass spectroscopic inspection in clarifying biological O18 over natural O16: deforestation's general biological life power reduction issue: a growing (respiratory) world pandemic threat situation

RESOLUTION 217 — Proving the Flinders Petrie 1883 Cheops Pyramid measures to mirror a GS Golden Section Matrix System solution:

— knowledge of Planck constant (h=mcr: neutron mass, light propagation in vacuum, neutron gravity spin radius), Earth mass and average Neutron mass density (Earth mass radius on that), encircling the geometry explained in Golden Section Matrix System Solutions, no primitive Egypt culture organization (all human civilization history explained);

— It occupied the author so intensely — the illustrated mathematical proof — that it was completely forgotten, for a short while, until checked, that RESOLUTION 217 (A) is also the declaration of universal human rights UDHR10Dec1948 — on the same connection: “.. and all of you are children of the most High”, Ps.82:6; no geographic Israel. ISRAEL cannot be inherited, does not connect to a physical body. No mother god loving way. It must be earned (realization through knowledge only).

   Cheops Pyramid Resolution 217 testifies a provable connective Origin of The Script (with a clear bottom line message, especially to UN): no geographical Israel. Proof of the Origin of Human Civilization: Resolution 217 (the clean 217 resolution as the pure mathematical Flinders Petrie Cheops Pyramid Cheops Rectangle Golden Section Matrix Systems Solution; 217 A as our respected UDHR10Dec1948). Disclaim. Claim whatever you want.

THE CLAIM — testifying and vindicating the origin of The Script: the urge of UN to clean up the mess itself has sanctioned: ISRAEL: suicide on humanity. Wake up world:

— Recognition. Not decision. Decision outside human right recognition has only power to destroy. Present day Earth situation illustrated.

 

None of these features AS SUCH NAMED occupy the content of and in modern academia (4Mar2024). Never mentioned. No teaching. No education.

THE LEVEL OF PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS IN THE CONSTRUCTION AND ITS DETAILED ACCOUNTABLE PLANNING, PERFECTLY EXCLUDES ANY PRIMITIVE CULTURAL ORIGIN.

See further short SCENE in Radiocarbon Dating.

 

MATH — Resolution 217 — fully explaining the origin of Human History Civilizations (disclaim):

INTEGER 217 connects and defines the Planck constant neutron Earth mass density Earth rJCIRCLE Cheops Pyramid Cheops Rectangle GS Golden Section Matrix System Solution Geometric Corner enveloping sphere, with a 99.9999832% confident definition of the 1881-1883 Flinders Petrie measured half Cheops Pyramid base 4534.40'' = bPETRIE = [h–r/217]rJ √R. The definition consolidates and certifies a direct and detailed proving connection between Petrie's quantitative measures and the corresponding calculated Golden Section Matrix System solution values, as presented. In explicit it shows on the equative solution to Petrie's observed and noted (general pyramid constructive) 19th course masonry thickness — its principal constructive connection to the inner descending corridor and its angular connection to the Pyramid's outer casing (Second Iterative Equation) — and their further appearing recursive constants on the other inner details.

   Taken along with The CLAIM — an explicit forensic testimony evidence, unless disclaimed, concluding a separate, quite different origin of The Script, the Old Testament, than the one present in established academia — the summing conclusion strongly points out a complete (deeply academia rebellious) explanation to our human, generally dim and embarrassingly difficult to encircle, historical origin on the level of civilization — and insight into advanced natural science;

 

WORD — Resolution 217 (A) — a universally formulated origin on the basis of a concept — dignity — in concern of caring for a Human Civilized History (disclaim):

— UDHR10Dec1948. 8 introducing Paragraphs, with a following 30 Articles, stressing A Universal Human Rights Declaration.

— No difference in right and dignity between born humans: no geographic Israel. No Trafficking. Concurring in full with the math and (archaeological) forensic GS Golden Section Matrix Systems Cheops Rectangle Cheops Pyramid 1883 Flinders Petrie measured Resolution 217 part: the origin.

--------------------

— Children — and even animals — apprehend that type of simple and easy to understand basics with excellent perfection.

— So, 2024 world wide business enterprise United Nation Tourist Cookie Ace, not one word human right mentioning recognition: where do you come from? Explain.

— Back off.

— ģGet the fuck out of my beachģ.

Stop killing humanity.

 

Disclaim — Faulty statements are not allowed here:

—————————————————————————

MODERN ACADEMY TheLIST AND ITS STATE ADMINISTRATIONS MicrosoftLIST ARE HOLDING HUMANITY IMPRISONED IN DEEP IGNORANCE

— by drift. Not plan. Provably Low educated, Retarded, Intellectually Disabled administrative managements: Cannot handle civilization. Not even close. Not one word human right recognition. Not a sound. Not a spell. Not a hint. Again: low educated, retarded. Does not understand The Concept: dignity — 100% state administrative oblivion  Not even a hint. Total Silence. Again:

— Children — and even animals — apprehend that type of simple and easy to understand basics with excellent perfection.

— So, again, 2024 world wide business enterprise United Nation Tourist Cookie Aces, not one word human right mentioning recognition:

— Where do you come from, and when did that happen? Explain.

 

Connecting Damn you Microsoft ..

—————————————————————————————————————

WORLD STATE ADMINISTRATION JURISDICTION

Refuses human computer rights

Disclaim (Mar2024):

—————————————————————————————————————

Uses humanity's collected capacity for developing Computers. World Trade. Market. All of it.

Then buying up Computer Usage Rights — with state administrative jurisdictional help —

in order to force — coercive treatment — the workers to also pay — provide economic support — for what they did create.

———————————————————————————————————

Exceptionally Very high developed sense for human right recognition respect. Oh my.

---------------------------------------------------

And you, prosecutor — and you court: says what about such open practicing Trafficking Human Mind charity?

— ģThat is not our cause. We only follow the stated lawsģ. Zero responsibility. Anarchy Directors.

---------------------------------------------------

— Oh .. gaad .. say something these eminent Aces are NOT.

—————————————————————————————————————

BOOK USABILITY LICENSE: You pay when you read!

PEN  USABILITY  LICENSE: You pay when you draw!

SHOE USABILITY LICENSE: You pay when you walk!

— NO ACCESS UNLESS INTERNET CONNECTED. Your rights and freedoms: suspended.

MIND USABILITY LICENSE: You pay when you use!

—————————————————————————————————————

— Did you say something — world business enterprise cannot hear you!

— You were saying?

—————————————————————————————————————

Mississippi 1820. Microsoft Copyright Enterprise.

 

ALL PETRIE DATA in this production are COLLECTED, QUOTED AND SAMPLED FROM

THE PYRAMIDS AND TEMPLES OF GIZEH, William Flinders Petrie 1883

W. M. Flinders Petrie 1883 — @INTERNET Ronald Birdsall, 2003-14

http://www.ronaldbirdsall.com/gizeh/petrie/index.htm

The Petrie quantities are tested against a Golden Section solution of an ideal CheopsRectangle bd=h˛ Pyramid

based on a (2017) discovered match between the size of the Earth on present mass by max neutron density

and the inscribed Pyramid as illustrated below in a Golden Section matrix mathematics related environment.

 

EARTHrJCIRCLE: RITa

 

CHEOPS PYRAMID IS A PROFOUND AND DETAILED GOLDEN SECTION MATRIX* SOLUTION — ON DEDUCED AND RELATED MATHEMATICS, CERTIFIED BY Flinders Petrie’s Measures 1881-1883 with

*GoldenSECTIONbĻPnCHARTmatrix: bn = Rnd ; Pn = bRn–1/√5 — unlimited fractal matrix series

 

EARTH SIZE

PRESENT MASS

ON MAX NEUTRON DENSITY

Disclaim. That will be the most interesting part in this expedition: Don’t forget to update.

 

Shorter:

— IT IS TIME TO CLOSE THE BED TIME STORIES ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF THE PYRAMIDS, I’m afraid.

Especially on the academic level of being primitive constructions.

 

 

CALCULATING PETRIE’S (1881-1883) MEASURED CHEOPS PYRAMID VALUES HERE IN UNIVERSE HISTORY (UH) IS PARTLY BASED ON A SIMPLE SCALING FROM PETRIE’S VALUES AS BELOW: 4534.40’’/100Ppixels.

— In this presentation the foremost parts are revisited (from the original 2017[discovery] and 2020[Atlas]) and clarified

— according to the related discovered planning of the building.

The plan center is the Pyramid center seen from above, with the (termed) Queen’s Chamber seen in view from East to West, as below.

The Cheops Pyramid has no found adornments or any other reported artifacts from its originally sealed available inner.

 

 

GOLDEN SECTION (GS) GEOMETRICAL MatrixSystem MATHEMATICS:

R = b/d = (–1 +√5)/2 = 2/(1 +√5) — GoldenSectionConstant = 0.618033989..

 

THE 10 FIRST Petrie-rJCIRCLE-CHEOPSRECTANGLE GoldenSectionMatrixMathematics verifications

VERIFICATION METHOD Ļ PrJCver1 Ļ PrJCver2 Ļ PrJCver3 Ļ PrJCver4 Ļ PrJCver5 Ļ PrJCver6 Ļ PrJCver7 Ļ PrJCver8 Ļ PrJCver9 Ļ PrJCver10

GoldenSECTIONbĻPnCHARTmatrix: bn = Rnd ; Pn = bRn–1/√5 — unlimited algebraic fractal GOLDEN SECTION Circle-SQUARE geometric series

ALGEBRAICGeometricSeriesMatrix — full GOLDENSECTIONCircleSquareGEOMETRICMatrix —

 

 

PYRAMID COORDINATE SYSTEM — adopted after Flinders Petrie’s measurements: NORTH Pyramid base edge (from one of the few remaining casing stones at that level)  defines the xy=0 coordinate center point. All horizontal measures are then related southwards (negative x — Petrie uses only positive values, referring to the North Pyramid base). With Petrie’s specified half Pyramid base bPetrie = 4534.40’’ ą 0.25’’, a regular Golden Section Petrie Pyramid copy appears, ready to be tested against Petrie’s actual measures. See details below in bPetrieDetermination.

   Once the half Pyramid base (b) lengt is known (bPETRIE), the bPetrieDetermination mathematical transfer creates a regular exact Golden Section Constant (R) Pyramid copy from the simple but powerful foundational (Mathematics Five Constitutions) CheopsRectangle mathematics bd=h˛.

   The Golden Section Pyramid designations, as above, have b/d = R = 2/(1+√5) = Ŋ(–1+√5) = 0.618033989 = 1/R – 1. From a known b, the R matrix system of equations is then presenting an entire Golden Section Pyramid copy — including a mathematical rJ=k connection. See Golden Section mathematics matrix system. Additional links in this production will follow the main text presentation.

 

 

EARTHrJCIRCLE equation:

rJ(Dmax) RITa

= 6.62559E-034/299792458*(3*5.975E+024/(PI()*(1.0086652*1.66033E-027)^4))^(1/3) Ļ OpenOfficeCalcCELLcode

= 198.572154778 M = k(rJ)

The rJ equation in related physics and mathematics:

Dmax = (mN)4(c0/h)3/4 Ļ V = mJ/D = r3/3 Ļ r3 = 3mJ/D = 3mJ/π(mN)4(c0/h)3  Ļ  rJ = [3mJ/π(mN)4]1/3(c0/h) = 198.5 721 548 M. See also: TheLIE —  comparing  Civilized Origins;

mJ = 5.975 T24 KG Ļ mN = 1.0086652u, u = 1.66033 t27 KG  = mC12/12 Ļ  h = 6.62559 t34 JS Ļ c0 = 2,99792458 T8 M/S. Natural Constants. See also from HowBegin — The Bilogical Earth: isotopic crust composition.

 

 

bPetrieDetermination:

Resolution 217

One single whole three digit number can provide the Neutron mN Planck Constant Light Physics familiar Earth mass mJ enclosing Neutron max Density rJ-sphere radius 198.572155 M geometrical mathematics to include the 1883 Flinders Petrie working group Cheops Pyramid measured quantities within the Petrie given tolerances of, half the pyramid side, 4534.40’’ ą 0.25’’, on the ideal Golden Section pyramid mathematics — with a preserved precision into 99.9999832%. What number is that? (h – r/217) ˇ √R = 4534.399236463:

(147.201338417 – 151.482764953/217) ˇ 0.786151378 = 4534.399236463’’ = Ļ 4534.40’’ ą0.25’’ PetrieCH6.25 Ļ = 115.173740606 M

PRECISION: 4534.40/4534.39924 = 1.000000168, inv. 0.999999832: 99.9999832%. This (8Jan2024) result has no previous text in UH (UniverseHistory).

— How is the number 217 explained? See the revealing details from ThePlan in TheUNITS.

 

 

Once the pyramid half base factor b is given,

a Golden Section Pyramid comparing solution with its following parameters are given from

The bd=h˛ Golden Section Constant R = 2/(1+√5) = (–1+√5)/2 = 0.618033989;

r = b/(3–√5) = b(1/R + 1)/2

x = r – b

d = b/R

R = b/d = 0.618033989

h = √bd

P = b/(R+1/R)

k = √ (d – b/2√5)˛ + b˛ (= rJ)

k0 = k/b = √1 + (Ŋ + 2/√5) = 1.715933329

k = bk0

P/r = 2/(R+1/R)(1/R + 1)

The Golden Section Cheops Rectangle Pyramid angle:

C° = aTan(1/√R) = 51.827292373° = 51° 49’ 38.2525’’

 

 

So, by principle, Resolution 217 presents a strict numerical 99.9999832% proof:

The rJ CIRCLE Golden Section Cheops Rectangle defines the ideal Golden section bPetrie (1881-1883) b = 4534.40’’ measured Cheops Pyramid — with its base Petrie plateau situated 27.48’’ above the actual rJ CIRCLE Cheops complex (Resolution217).

 

And it is apparently so: Without the rJ CIRCLE/Sphere definition, also the bPetrie = 4534.40’’ defined deduction is absent. As the established academia archaeologists are not likely to give credit to the 2 500 BC Egyptians in familiarity with the rJ CIRCLE/Sphere definition — Planck constant, atomic physics neutron details and propagation of light physics, even the mass of the Earth — there is not much left to chose on in placing the Cheops Pyramid (and its alike constructs) on the map of time: long before. The 1881-1883 Flinders Petrie group measures of the Cheops Pyramid is now taking a stand as the one stone solid proof.

 

 

Resolution217: TheUNITS Ļ Explain217 — detailed deductionĻ RITa

 

bPETRIE            = [h – r/217]rJ ˇ √R = 4534.399236463 Ļ = 4534.40’’

                                       = [5795.3282841311’’ — 5963.8883839628’’/217][0.7861513778] = 4534.3992364633’’

DISCOVERY: 10Jan2024.

USE: Definition of Petrie’s Cheops Pyramid half base 4534.40’’ from the EARTHrJCIRCLE

Golden Section Matrix System Solutions — the proving connecting core: TheUNITS Ļ MiUNIT

———————————————————————————————

How the Cheops Pyramid Flinders Petrie (1883) measured data led to

THE CONTRACTED CONSTRUCT —

explaining (proving) the Cheops Pyramid building plan in detail — or not at all

Resolution 217

4534.40/4534.399236463 = 1.000000168, inv. 0.999999832.

Precision: 

99.9999832%: [h – r/217]rJ ˇ √R = 4534.399236463 Ļ = 4534.40’’

READ IT AND WEEP (rJref ) — or RESOLUTION 217

The PetrieCH6.25 bPETRIE half pyramid base length value 4534.40’’ (ą0.25’’) — a highly possible peak into the pyramid constructor’s desktop

 

•   It is in no way a derogating teminology or phrasing (rather the opposite):

The READ IT AND WEEP terminology may be convenient in a context

•   where everything — up till some time — seems to be a riddle, ģsimply impossible crap .. gimme a break ..ģ, but

•   really has a sophisticated (simple) solution, when everything comes about (ģfrom a cry to a smileģ).

———————————————

CALTEP Ļ METHOD Ļ GOLDEN SECTION MATRIX SYSTEM Ļ FirstResult

 

ChEX: — FirstResult:               Resolution 217 Ļ BasicCalculations: THE7BEGIN Ļ BpointDetermination — formating BUARMyATH, BconnectingPG, PyramidCenterĻ MAIN:

ChEX — FirstResultĻ SecondResult — CALTEP with FirstResult application test Ļ Height18 Ļ

 

Example:

Based on comparing the Petrie Cheops Pyramid measures

DETERMINING/testing THE CORRIDOR HEIGHT

BASIC GOLDEN SECTION GEOMETRICAL MATHEMATICS only

h = ([bPETRIE = 4534.40’’]/100)(2 ˇ 3 ˇ 18 / 100)˛ ˇ 0.8 Ļ PREFIXxSIN: (sinĻcos ArcTanŊ)˛ = 0.8 Ļ 0.2.

 

FirstEX: ChEX

First simple CALCULATION BY SCALE   bPETRIE4534.40’’/100pixels  OF THE DESCENDING PASSAGE HEIGHT

ALL MEASURES AFTER THE 1881-1883 FLINDERS PETRIE CHEOPS PYRAMID MEASUREMENTS

ALL VALUES IN A PETRIE STANDARD 2 DECIMAL ROUNDED INCHES

—————————————————————

PETRIE DATA SOURCE:

THE PYRAMIDS AND TEMPLES OF GIZEH, William Flinders Petrie 1883

W. M. Flinders Petrie 1883 — @INTERNET Ronald Birdsall, 2003-14

http://www.ronaldbirdsall.com/gizeh/petrie/index.htm

PetrieCH6.32:

”(5) entrance passage height 47.26.”. [ ą 0.17’’ ]

 

 

 

It is suggested that the entire Golden Section Matrix System represents ģAN ARITHMETIC RESONANCEģ — compare M74 — generating multiple recursive whole number solutions [directly connected to life morphology]. See VOOD for the testing method.

RESOLUTION 217 — it gives a 99.9999832% close definition of the bPetrie 4534.40’’ ą 0,25’’ half Cheops Pyramid base — offers a first successful test together with the Petrie Cheops Pyramid pixel scaled version 4534.40’’/100p as below. It shows a (Resolution217) recursive small set of constants 2•3•18=108 directly leading to a close Petrie tolerance concordant quantity of the tunnel height (deviation: 0.05’’  from Petrie’s max ą 0.17’’). The solution uses the number 108 in a factor form (108/100)˛. See also The18.

   Nearly the same value (47.3050516137’’) appears also in the Fifth result — a more detailed summing of significant components entirely based on the Golden Section Matrix System METHOD. The recurring constants appear at three sites (Tunnel cross B, Gallery ramp top PG, and Pyramid North entrance A).

   It should be noted that all these results are based on conversion operations (CALTEP) between the Golden Section Matrix System and the originally tested rJCIRCLE value. Without the latter, the decisive constants, transfers and units and their results will not appear (Original Cheops Rectangle 2017).

   The number 108 appears when testing the Petrie value 47.26 to the scaled illustration: 1.08˛ ÷ (47.26 ÷ [2p(4534.40’’/100p)/2 • 0.8 = 40.55690655]  =1.165276251) = 1.000964363. With a 1.000000000 match the Petrie measured Ch = 47.26” value becomes 47.3055758’’: inside the Petrie associated tolerance. Meaning: The construction might as well have been ordained from the 1.08˛ numerical operation. As the results are OK within the Petrie advised tolerances, we cannot disprove the existence of a matching building plan.

 

Vh = (4534.40’’/100)([108 = 2•3•18]/100

THE SCALING PRECISION

Summing Components VALUE IN  FifthResult Ļ EntrancePassageAngle Ļ SecondResult 

47.3050516137’’ Ļ 47.31

 

Result: Equation’s calculated value

using Resolution 217 recurring numeric constants:

2(4534.40/00)([108/2]/100)˛√0.8 =

e=ChTUNNEL 47.3055758’’descending tunnel parallel height

(4534.20/100)(108/100)˛√0.8 = 47.3034892787’’ Ļ 47.30

rJCR scaleTest:              47.31’’ (no tolerance)    ; approved. 99.8943141 % match. [ ą 0.04’’  = ą1.016 mM ]

Petrie measure:             47.26’’ (ą 0.17’’)           ; highest 47.43, lowest 47.09 Ļ deviation: 0.0455758’, = 0.05”.

PetrieCH6.32.r56: ” entrance passage angle at mouth 26°29’ ą 1’, entrance passage height 47.26”.

No specified tolerance in that quote. Petrie’s text above the quoted (r32, see PetrieQUOTE19th) specifies ”mean doorway height .. 37.67 ą .17”; Adopting a 47.26’’ ą 0.17’’, our (numeric) 47.3056 is OK (+0.0456). The result is certified through another approach on the same result (see Second result and more precisely the Fifth result).

Difference rJCR – PETRIEm = 0.0455758’’ — well within an adopted ą 0.17’’ tolerance.

 

Ch                     = 2p(4534.40’’/200p)(108/100)˛ ˇ 0.8 ; uses 2•3•18=108 from Resolution 217.

                          = 47.3055758’’              ; CorridorHeight

108/100             = 2 ˇ 3 ˇ 18 / 100 = 27/25 = 3ŗ / 5˛

Conclusion:

Petrie verified Entrance passage Height

Application Example:

See (Second result)

HOW PETRIE CALCULATED THE ENTRANCE

Comment:

IF we were dependent on Petrie’s measured half Pyramid base bPETRIE = 4534.40’’ ą 0.25’’ ONLY, the above reckoning would only be ģa regular result from robbing on Petrie’s scaled Pyramidģ. We would not get any independent credit for such a theft. As the bPETRIE 4534.40’’ as such however now (Jan2024) has found a whole number Resolution217 independent solution with a safe rJCIRCLE related match 99.9999832% — using recursive constants, the being used on multiple sites — we are no longer bound by Petrie’s measures. Resolution217 allows a claiming status of a direct definition of the Petrie half Pyramid base INCH measure — in turn from the (MiUNIT) numerical operation

rJ/100R16000 = 0.025400718 an automatic 0.0254 M unit if so rounded on the Planck Dmax mJ constant in our rJCIRCLE. Our 1 Inch = 0.0254 Meter definition.

So the InchMeter UNIT adoption is proven, by arithmetics, independent of Petrie’s results — rather as their definition. We will see that it is so by the Petrie measured details.

 

Explain Resolution 217: FIRSTex

Petrie CH6 22 (The possible 27.58’’Ļ27.48’’ factor, IntroTEF): [all four corners with different vertical ground socket sets between 23.0-39.9’’ below Petrie’s pavement].

After having used the bPetrie pyramid data, resulting in an ideal height difference hDIFF between PetrieCR and rJCR of 27.48’’, we made a simple numerical test:

Testing the rJCR basic CHEOPS RECTANGLE bh=h2 GoldenSection Pyramid parameters b 2b h d x r P P/2 P/r k R k0 on a division with  h – hPetrieĻCR =27.48’’ (27.482385374) gave the results: 165.77911  331.55821    210.87428  268.23623  51.22856  h=198.572154778 M  Ļ r Ļ  Ļ 217.00767  74.13867  37.06934  284.46590  0.02249  0.06244. No other basics.

Reversing the revealed ģx.00 yģ reckoning yields: (as it so has happened: 7 and 31 are primes (the 4th and 11th): 7 ˇ 31 = 217 = 116 + 101 = 108 + 8 + 101: The7):

hDIFF = (rĻrJ)/217 = 27.483356608’’ = 27.48’’ ;  [h – r/217]rJ ˇ √R = 4534.399236463; compressed:

hĻrJ – hDIFF = hĻPetrieCR = 5767.844927523 = ģ5767.85ģ’’* ;  bPETRIECPĻCR = hĻPetrieCRR = 4534.399236463 = 4534.40’’.

4534.40/4534.399236463 = 1.000000168, inv. 0.999999832.

* 5767.845898757’’ / 5767.844927523 = 1.000000168, inv, 0.999999832 = 99.9999832%.

Petrie’s (Petrie CH6 22) bPetrieCPĻCR = 4534.40’’ (ą0.25’’) appears directly — can be calculated OR WAS SO DELIBERATELY SELECTED from the rJ GoldenSection (r) Cheops Rectangle.

— See how the crucial hDIFF (27.48’’) exposes a possible direct insight into the pyramid planning construct in THE UNITS: How bPETRIE 4534.40’’ is determined from rJCR with no less precision than 99.9999832%. That given, the whole plan is given in principle.

———————————————

See wider in

CALTEP Ļ TheMiUNIT Ļ Explaining Golden Section Pyramid Agents

 

 

AppendixResolution217 Ļ RITa  Ļ EARTHrJCIRCLE  Ļ  EARTHrJCIRCLEequation  Ļ  rJ  Ļ  bPetrieDetermination  Ļ  Resolution217  Ļ  ChEX  Ļ  FirstResult  Ļ  FirstEX  Ļ  Res1  Ļ  EXPLAINResolution217  Ļ  Star1  Ļ 

 

PyramidData: Res217 Ļ ChEX

THE 4 rJCR PYRAMID AGENT’S BASIC DATA

PetrieCP    PetrieCR    Agent16    Agent58

 

DATAPetrieSOURCE:  PetrieSOURCES Ļ PetrieQUOTES — detailed 2’’ decimal Petrie data specifications used to refere and certify the rJ Cheops description

 

THE PYRAMIDS AND TEMPLES OF GIZEH, William Flinders Petrie 1883 — W. M. Flinders Petrie 1883 — @INTERNET Ronald Birdsall, 2003-14

Petrie CP Cheops Pyramid — the original (1881-1883) Flinders Petrie group measured basic Cheops Pyramid Values          

—————————

PetrieCP:

                                

                              our tourist version

°

=

51.866666667

 

 

 

° ’ ’’

=

51.52000000

 

measured/estimated

 

 

INCH2dec

ątol’’

METER

 

b

=

4534.40

0.25

115.173760000

measured  PetrieCH6section25

2b

=

9068.80

0.50

230.347520000

measured

h

=

5776.00

7.0*

146.710400000

measured/estimated

d

=

7343.23

—

186.517925307

measured

x

=

1404.41

—

35.672082653

not connected

r

=

5938.81

—

150.845842653

not connected

P

=

2027.05

—

51.487136856

not connected

P/2

=

1013.53

—

25.743568428

not connected

P/r

=

0.341322876

—

0.341322876

not connected

k

=

7786.26

—

197.771051527

not connected

R

=

0.617494323

—

0.617494323

not connected

k0

=

—

—

—

not connected

*CheopsATLAS.htm#PCH6s25 — Petrie’s quote (high uncertainty)

-------------------------------------

 

Petrie CR — the ideal Flinders Petrie group measured Golden Section Cheops Rectangle Pyramid      

—————————

PetrieCR:

                                

                      featuring Chepos Rectangle

°

=

51.827292373

 

 

aTan(1/√R)

° ’ ’’

=

51.49382525

 

GoldenSection

 

 

INCH2dec

ątol’’

METER

geometric

b

=

4534.40

0.25

115.173760000

Ļ r(3–√5) Ļ h√ (–1+√5)/2 = h√R

2b

=

9068.80

0.50*

230.347520000

 

h

=

5767.85

0.32*

146.503285828

√ bd

d

=

7336.81

0.40*

186.355058292

√ b˛ + h˛ Ļ r(–1+√5) Ļ b/R

x

=

1401.21

0.08*

35.590649146

r – b

r

=

5935.61

0.33*

150.764409146

(d+b)/2 Ļ r=1 Ļ (b/R + b)/2 = b(1/R + 1)/2

P

=

2027.85

0.11*

51.507271317

b/(R+1/R) = b/√5

P/2

=

1013.92

0.06*

25.753635658

 

P/r

=

0.341640786

—

 

2/(R+1/R)(1/R + 1)

k

=

7780.73

0.43*

197.630493458

k0 = √ b˛ + (d–P/2)˛

R

=

0.618033989

—

 

b/d = [–1+√5]/2

k0

=

1.715933329

—

 

√ 1 + (Ŋ +2/√5)˛

Tolerance aspect:

*ą0.50’’/9068.80’’ × INCH2dec’’ = ą0.tt’’ —  as adopted from Petrie’s standard Half Pyramid base 4534.40’’ tolerance  ą 0.25’’

-------------------------------------

 

rJ CR — the (Nov2017) TNED/Planck/Dmax/EarthMass discovered Golden Section Cheops Rectangle Pyramid.

4556.01: It is the rJCIRCLE CheopsRectangle (Cheops Pyramid) original (k = 198.572154778 M) with b=k/k0=4556.01’’.

—————————

   rJ CR:

                              

                    rJCIRCLE:s Cheops Rectabgle

°

=

51.827292373

 

 

aTan(1/√R)

° ’ ’’

=

51.49382525

 

GoldenSection

 

 

INCH2dec

ątol’’

METER

geometric

b

=

4556.01

0.25*

115.722535004

Ļ r(3–√5) Ļ h√ (–1+√5)/2 = h√R

2b

=

9112.01

0.50*

231.445070008

 

h

=

5795.33

0.32*

147.201338417

√ bd

d

=

7371.77

0.40*

187.242994901

√ b˛ + h˛ Ļ r(–1+√5) Ļ b/R

x

=

1407.88

0.08*

35.760229948

r – b

r

=

5963.89

0.33*

151.482764953

(d+b)/2 Ļ r=1 Ļ (b/R + b)/2 = b(1/R + 1)/2

P

=

2037.51

0.11*

51.752690960

b/(R+1/R) = b/√5

P/2

=

1018.75

0.06*

25.876345480

 

P/r

=

0.341640786

—

 

2/(R+1/R)(1/R + 1)

k

=

7817.80

0.43*

198.572154778

k0 = √ b˛ + (d–P/2)˛

R

=

0.618033989

—

 

b/d = [–1+√5]/2

k0

=

1.715933329

—

 

√ 1 + (Ŋ +2/√5)˛

*Tolerance aspect:

*ą0.50’’/9068.80’’ × INCH2dec’’ = ą0.tt’’

-------------------------------------

h DIFF rJCR – PetrieCR:

  0.698052589 M

27.482385374’’ ; 27.48’’ (ą0.32’’)

 

Petrie CRĻb58 — an actual tolerated Flinders Petrie group measured Golden Section Cheops Rectangle Pyramid — ģAgent58ģ

PetrieCRĻb58: INSIDE PETRIE CR — b associated: inside PetrieTolerances ą 0.25’’ from nominal 4534.40’’

58R√1600  = 4534.196575969’’, = 4534.20’’ — THE PETRIE SUFFIXES here HAVE NO rJ ASSOCIATED.

See also MiUNIT.

 

        PetrieCRĻb58:

                                

                       tolerated PetrieCR version

°

=

51.827292373

 

 

aTan(1/√R)

° ’ ’’

=

51.49382525

 

GoldenSection

 

 

INCH2dec

ątol’’

METER

geometric

b

=

4534.20

0.25

115.168593030

Ļ r(3–√5) Ļ h√ (–1+√5)/2 = h√R

2b

=

9068.39

0.50*

230.337186059

 

h

=

5767.59

0.32*

146.496713341

√ bd

d

=

7336.48

0.40*

186.346697958

√ b˛ + h˛ Ļ r(–1+√5) Ļ b/R

x

=

1401.14

0.08*

35.589052464

r – b

r

=

5935.34

0.33*

150.757645494

(d+b)/2 Ļ r=1 Ļ (b/R + b)/2 = b(1/R + 1)/2

P

=

2027.75

0.11*

51.504960577

b/(R+1/R) = b/√5

P/2

=

1013.88

0.06*

25.752480289

 

P/r

=

0.341640786

—

 

2/(R+1/R)(1/R + 1)

k

=

7780.38

0.43*

197.621627281

k0 = √ b˛ + (d–P/2)˛

R

=

0.618033989

—

 

b/d = [–1+√5]/2

k0

=

1.715933329

—

 

√ 1 + (Ŋ +2/√5)˛

Tolerance aspect:

*ą0.50’’/9068.80’’ × INCH2dec’’ = ą0.tt’’

-------------------------------------

h DIFF rJCR – PetrieCRĻb58:

  0.704625076 M

27.741144740’’ ; 27.74’’ (ą0.32’’)

 

Petrie CRĻb16 — same as Agent58 Golden Section Cheops Rectangle Pyramid  but with its pyramid base rJ-associated — ģAgent16ģ

rJ CRĻb16: INSIDE rJ CR — rJ associated: inside rJ Cheops tolerance ą 0.25’’  [ extracted preference from Petrie’s nominal 4534.40’’ half Pyramid base ]

rJ = 7817.80’’ = 198.572154778 M Ļ rJ’ = 7817.58’’ = 198.566539706 M  Ļ rJDIFF = 0.221065826’’ = 0.005615072 M

100R√1600  = 7817.580303394’’ = 198.566539706 M  = rJ’  Ļ    = rJ’/k0 = (100R√1600)/√[(2/√5 + Ŋ)˛ + 1] = 4555.876483882’’= 4555.88’’ :  — THE PETRIE SUFFIXES HAVE an ASSOCIATED  rJ .

See also MiUNIT.

 

        PetrieCRĻb16:

                               

 

                  MiUNIT calculated rJCR version

               MAIN CONSTRUCTION PLAN PYRAMID AGENT

°

=

51.827292373

 

 

aTan(1/√R)

° ’ ’’

=

51.49382525

 

GoldenSection

 

 

INCH2dec

ątol’’

METER

geometric

b

=

4555.88

0.25

115.719262691

Ļ r(3–√5) Ļ h√ (–1+√5)/2 = h√R

2b

=

9111.75

0.50*

231.438525381

 

h

=

5795.16

0.32*

147.197175970

√ bd

d

=

7371.56

0.40*

187.237700186

√ b˛ + h˛ Ļ r(–1+√5) Ļ b/R

x

=

1407.84

0.08*

35.759218748

r – b

r

=

5963.72

0.33*

151.478481439

(d+b)/2 Ļ r=1 Ļ (b/R + b)/2 = b(1/R + 1)/2

P

=

2037.45

0.11*

51.751227536

b/(R+1/R) = b/√5

P/2

=

1018.72

0.06*

25.875613768

 

P/r

=

0.341640786

—

 

2/(R+1/R)(1/R + 1)

k

=

7780.38

0.43*

198.566539706

k0 = √ b˛ + (d–P/2)˛

R

=

0.618033989

—

 

b/d = [–1+√5]/2

k0

=

1.715933329

—

 

√ 1 + (Ŋ +2/√5)˛

Tolerance aspect:

*ą0.50’’/9068.80’’ × INCH2dec’’ = ą0.tt’’

-------------------------------------

hDIFF PetrieCRĻb16 – PetrieCRĻb58:

  0.700462629 M

27.577268865’’ ; 27.58’’ (ą0.32’’)

 

CalculatingThePetrieMeasures:

PyramidDATA

From THE Mi-UNIT and the following rJ-CIRCLE connections

rJ/100R16000             = 0.025400718 an automatic 0.0254 M unit if so rounded on the Planck Dmax mJ constant

 

16000 = 5 ˇ 2 ˇ 2 ˇ 2 ˇ √2 ˇ √5 = 5 ˇ 8 ˇ √2 ˇ √5 = (58 – 18) ˇ √2 ˇ √5 = 40√10 = 5 ˇ 8 ˇ √10. All Golden Section terms.

also follows the two Cheops Rectangle associated Pyramid agents b58 and b16

 

See the specific basic Pyramid data in PetrieCP, PetrieCR, rJCR, Agent58 and Agent16.

The basic Golden Section factors

16000 = 5 ˇ 2 ˇ 2 ˇ 2 ˇ √2 ˇ √5 = 5 ˇ 8 ˇ √2 ˇ √5 = (58 – 18) ˇ √2 ˇ √5 = 40√10 = 5 ˇ 8 ˇ √10. All Golden Section terms.

define these different agents through the Mi-UNIT definitions with their specific corresponding bPETRIE (4534.40ą0.25)’’ value and its Petrie given tolerance. As such, and only as such, these Pyramid agents are legimit consultants in the work aimed at deducing the Petrie measured values from them — or not at all. It is all started from The rJCIRCLE.

— See further a first detailed example in CALCULATING THE Petrie values of the Cheops PYRAMID xyENTRANCE.

 

 

PyramidData Ļ PetrieCP  Ļ bPetrieTol  Ļ PetrieCR  Ļ TolASP  Ļ rJCR  Ļ rJCRtab  Ļ rJCRb  Ļ hrJ  Ļ rrJ  Ļ kFACTORrJ  Ļ hDIFFmain  Ļ Agent58  Ļ Agent16  Ļ Pref  Ļ CalTePEM 

 

ExplainingGSPA: METHOD Ļ CalculatingThePetrieMeasures

 

EXPLAINING THE DIFFERENT GOLDEN SECTION CHEOPS RECTANGLE MATHEMATICS bd=h2 PYRAMID AGENTS

 

Explain — HowSTART — PROVING THE CONTRACTED CONSTRUCT

While Petrie’s Cheops measurement (PetrieCP) have no fix and stable preference except the Petrie measured Cheops Pyramid base (4534.40’’ ą 0.25 Ļ PetrieCH6.s24) and his mentioned mean staircase masonry slope (aver. 51° 52’ ą 2’ Ļ @North 51° 53’ 20’’ ą 1’), the two new testing envelopings PetrieCR and rJĻCR — within the Petrie given tolerances, otherwise we’re smoked — do have such properties: Same visual (GS) Ideal Golden Section Cheops Rectangle bd=h˛ pyramid. Only slightly different height from same top (hDIFFmain).

   What does that situation suggest?

   The situation suggests that IF the pyramid was SO intended — if, and only if — these two solid preference guiders and a marker (based on a careful original planning) WILL define a clear reference where Petrie’s measurement WILL coincide — practically excellent perfect. In other more clear words: Petrie’s measured values can be calculated exactly from the GS (resonant) matrix — within Petrie’s given tolerances — or not at all. That will be our test.

— We have already seen (EARTHrJCIRCLE Ļ rJ-CIRCLE) that there (already) is a profound VISUAL fit in the simple geometric paragons.

— But how close is it, and what can it clarify and elucidate?

 

General method:

We seek SIMPLE (ģdon’t get overly creativeģ.. or: do so, and see where it leads ..) whole number solutions (as advised by the GS-body — compare Resolution217.

 

Explain more in detail:

While all of the Petrie measures pertain to ģthe upper pyramidģ

 

 

 

 

Upper pyramid icons left, their half Pyramid bases — have Petrie’s assigned tolerance ą 0.25’,

respectively the original bPetrie 4534.40’’ and the defined and related associated Agent58:s 4534.20’’.

 

The upper Pyramid Icons relate the Petrie pavement (Pyramid Coordinate System) preference.

The lower Pyramid Icons relate also the Petrie pavement preference, but have a slightly broader and lower situated base (due to the testing EARTHrJCIRCLE, the rJ factor as the related k-factor); these two lower also have a tolerance aspect as here adopted from the Petrie half Pyramid base standard ą 0.25’’; as after the Tolerance Aspect length ą 0.43’’ on the rJ distance. However, their rJ-difference is only 0.221065826’’ — so safely still within the testing Petrie advised more narrow half Pyramid tolerance.

 

 

the one and only possible original building plan — if at all —

 

(the actual construction DRAFT AND PRECISE MATHEMATICAL DRAWING)

 

must relate to the slightly larger testing EARTHrJCIRCLE Golden Section Cheops Rectangle Mathematics’ rJCR pyramid slightly higher, lower founded rJCR pyramid.

— Everything else is out of the question.

 

— Why is that?

 

— The only Pyramid Agent capable of defining (Resolution 217) a close (99.9999832%) match to the Petrie specified half Pyramid base 4534.40’’, is, what we know, the EARTHrJCIRCLE Cheops Rectangle Golden Section Matrix System equivalent. So, the potential constructors would have that premise for us to deduce: Petrie’s base accurately defined — along with a corresponding rJCIRCLE high precision numerically related MiUNIT 1 INCH = 0.0254 M. Without these preferences, the Petrie measured comparing calculated data will not respond. Not even close.

 

— Why the two Pyramid agents?

 

 

As stated: Without a bPetrie 4534.40’’ definition we’re done. The only one here known preference (Resolution 217) to realize that is the slightly higher/deeper — same top — Cheops Rectangle Golden Section Pyramid — having the k=rJ-circle radius: the EARTHrJCIRCLE. Based on that premise, an assisting Agent58 appears related and deduced from the constants with a b-value within the bPetrie 4534.40’’ tolerance ą 0.25’’: the Agent58 (4534.20’’). It assists a rJCR spouse Agent16 in presenting all the actual Petrie measured values — or, not at all. See MiUNIT, CALTEP and Resolution 217.

 

 

THE ROUTE IN THIS PRESENTATION BY CONCRETE EXAMPLES:

———————————————

Resolution217 Ļ DETERMINING/testing THE CORRIDOR HEIGHT Ļ How Petrie Calculated THE ENTRANCE Ļ The height of the 19th course Ļ CONSEQUENCES Ļ Determining the B point 

Practicing a Horizontal Offset push — Petrie’s measured tunnel crossing B-point defined 

 

 

ExplainingGSPA   

 

CaseHistory:

 

SHORT CASE HISTORY

CaseHistory:

THE SIMPLE TEST THAT STARTED IT ALL ..

2017: How it started ..

BASED ON THE 1881-1883 FLINDERS PETRIE THOROUGHLY MEASURED CHEOPS PYRAMID

————————————————————————————————————————————

THE ideal geometrical Cheops Pyramid 51.82729237° CHEOPS RECTANGLE (CR) connection

bd = h˛

with its Golden Section geometry paragon points out a significant (Queen's Chamber, k) center (P/2) on the inner projected hollow Cheops Pyramid content.

———————————————

GoldenSECTION Ļ R = b/d = [–1+√5]/2 = 0.618033989 = 2/(1+√5)Ļ P/2 :  P = b/[ R + 1/R ] = b/√5

 

Half pyramid base (b) and the pyramid height (h) give the pyramid side (d) as

d = √ b˛+h˛

Raising d as a vertical (y), removing the bottom P/2 distance, defines a k-center sloping triangle side (rJ=k) as

k = √ b˛ + (d – P/2)˛

with a tangent (k0)

k0 = √ 1 + (Ŋ +2/√5)˛ = (d – P/2)/b = k/b = 1.715933329 so that (b=k/k0)

k = k0b with the ideal 51.82729237° Golden Section paragon pyramid CR-value

k = 197.630493458 M receives a corresponding 51.86666667° Flinders Petrie (1881-1883) measured (no pyramid casing)

k = 197.771051527 M

 

On 1Nov2017 a simple calculating TNED test was made taking the neutron circumscribed block density Dmax on the present Earth mass (mJ = 5.975 T24 KG). Its corresponding Dmax Earth radius r(Dmax) = (h/c0)(3mJ/π[mN]4)1/3 (constants in the link below) is

———————————————

rJ(Dmax) RITa

k = 6.62559E-034/299792458*(3*5.975E+024/(PI()*(1.0086652*1.66033E-027)^4))^(1/3) Ļ OpenOfficeCalc

k = 198.572154778 M = k(rJ)

k and k0 factor

k0 = 1.715933329 = √ 1 + (Ŋ +2/√5)˛ — fix geometric for the Golden Section bd=h˛ CheopsRectangle

 

The difference in the computer screen scale is not visible: the k-circle touches the (b.d)-rectangle corner on the exact pixel. Exactly. 172.411 pixels respectively 172.384 pixels. 172.

———————————————

rJCIRCLEillustrated1Nov2017

 

We were on.

Further investigations deepened the suggested connections.

— Main purpose: find any argument to disclaim the suggested coherences. Still searching.

— WHILE we search, data is collected and archived.

 

 

CaseHistory  Ļ TST  Ļ Rref Ļ rJref Ļ k0ref

 

TheUNITS: CaseHistory Ļ Resolution217

 

Arithmetical laborations on seeking simple integer solutions — a simple construct

4534.399236463 Ļ bPetrie: 4534.40’’ ą 0.25’’

DETERMINING THE bPETRIE FROM THE rJ

THE UNITS — Why 217?

The short version: N = r/(H – [h = bPETRIE/√R]) = 5963.89/(5795.33 – XĻ2Decimals) = LowestDecimalPossible;

Highest possible decimal precision — Highest Possible value HP:

 

X = r/(H – [h = bPETRIE/√R]) ;

HP = 1/(X – INT[X]) ; HP = 130.3980100; HighestPossible

 

bPETRIE            N = INT[X]

————             ———————

4534.20             215.0172581

4534.30             216.0078784

4534.40             217.0076688    bPetrie(PetrieCH6.25)

4534.50             218.0167574

4534.60             219.0352743

 

N = 217 = INT[X]:

 

PetrieCR versus rJCR only, no Pyramid Agents involved:

————————————————————

Unrelated numerical Solution — use the 4th and 11th prime product 7 ˇ 31 = 217: = 109 + 108 = 109 + 2•3•18

bPETRIE            = [h – r/217]rJ ˇ √R = 4534.399236463’’  = 4534.40’’.

                                       = [5795.3282841311’’ — 5963.8883839628’’/217][0.7861513778] = 4534.3992364633’’

 

4534.40/4534.399236463 = 1.000000168, inv. 0.999999832: 99.9999832% match.

hDIFF = (rĻrJ)/217 = 27.483356608’’ = 27.48’’ ; 

— bPETRIE(PetrieCH6.25) = 4534.40’’ it is — ą 0.25’’.

WE SHOULD SAY — AS THE rJCIRCLE VALUE COMES FROM ONLY NATURAL CONSTANTS — THAT WHATEVER APPEARS IN EXPLICIT simple WHOLE NUMBER OCCASIONS IN THIS COMPLEX, IT IS APPARENTLY NOT A PRODUCT OF A MANS HAND: ģARITHMETIC RESONANCEģ.

— NO MAGIC. NO MYSTERY. JUST LIFE. [ Which, of course, is the greatest Magic Beauty Wonder of all ..].

 

WHAT WE KNOW: WITHOUT THE PRECISE rJCIRCLE PREFERENCE, SUCH A HIGH SCORE RESULT IS IMPOSSIBLE: THE ENTIRE PETRIE DATA MATCHING CALULATIONS IN THIS PRESENTATION DEPEND ON THAT PREFERENCE AND ITS CONNECTION TO THE GOLDEN SECTION MATRIX SYSTEM.

 

Fully related answer — TheUNITS:

A bPetrie —————————————————————    a visual top BASE preference PetriePAVEMENT

from where to make Absolute [Petrie] measures.

The actual in real stone physical construct base.

 

B rJCR  ——————————————————————   absolute ground pyramid rJ CIRCLE Pyramid base: The DRAFT construct:

Hidden from any direct visual investigation.

The TNED related physics and mathematics has no representation in modern quarters:

The EARTHrJ CIRCLE Dmax complex — Cheops Rectangle

 

PetrieCR versus rJCR only, no Pyramid Agents involved:

————————————————————

Explain — scenery Ļ rJCR results Ļ CALTEP :

The constructors took a numerical scan (ending on a heigh offset: rJCR minus PetrieCR, = 27.48’’ rounded from 27.483356608’’, CheopsATLAS2024.ods, Tabell5 L22) — beginning from (B, fully related) the rJPyramid bottom — advancing upwards to A, taking an A level pyramid base only on a one decimal .x0 rounded inch value (the candidating bPetrie values xxxx.n0).

Constructor’s Task to be solved:

— We have to set a standard measuring platform above the rJCircle Pyramid base — if any future tourists will have a chance of getting a deductive clue to our construct, and what it proves. So:

— Is there, in the named scan, a close to a whole number solution for a (hDIFF = B – A) slightly higher than our basic B, so defining an ideal Petrie CR pyramid with a slightly less height Top.A than our Top.B original rJ CR pyramid? (The overall result must be based on one decimal rounded inch .x0-measure already from the start, see TheMiUNIT).

Result:

— Yes. There is such a whole number: 217.

— See the (CALTEP) bPetrie Determination:

[h – r/217]rJ ˇ √R = 4534.399236463’’ , = 4534.40’’:

X                        = r/(H – [h = bPETRIE/√R]) ; HP = 1/(X – INT[X]) ;

HP                      = 130.3980100; HighestPossible

  X                      = 217.0076688, INT[X] = 217 is our number.

A—B                  = 27.483356608’’ = 27.48’’ ;

bPETRIE            = 4534.399236463’’, = 4534.40’’ [future tolerance depends on magnitude of erosion]

Precision:

99.9999832% — COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE TO MISS, PROVIDED A SERIOUS APPROACH

4534.399236463/4534.40 = 99.9999832%.

4534.40’’ it is: see further MiUNIT:

rJ/100R16000             = 0.025400718 an automatic 0.0254 M unit if so rounded on the Planck Dmax mJ constant

1’’ = 0.0254 M. And so it is [The actual Academic History behind this present equality is not further known here].

 

— It was originally so determined — unless the reader has found another solution, apparently factually — impossible to miss with a future enough sophisticated (Petrie 1881+) optically measuring instrumentation.

   Consequential Mathematics (COMA — The Iterator): It is — or it isn’t.

   Basic CPU handling routiines.

 

FirstPROOF: TST  Ļ RIW

FIRST rJ-CHEOPS PROOF

Knowing we are safe and sound on the right course

 

TheMiU: FirstPROOF

provided rJ-guided — in the Cheops Rectangle-geometrics:

The rJCheopsRectangle contains a numerical ģautomatic meter-(1)inch(0.0254)ģ unit

WITH A GIVEN 1 INCH = 0.0254 M DEFINITION AND THE [1881] PETRIE DEFINED CHEOPS PYRAMID HALF BASE 4534.40’’ FROM Earth rJCIRCLE AND the GOLDEN SECTION MATRIX SYSTEM [the simple basic ģCheops Rectangleģ connection bd=h˛], the rest of the unit system parameters become automatically present through a universal physical MKSA system: Meter Kilogram Second Ampere, independent of chosen numerical standard. That vindicates, and certifies, a time [and culture] independent universal physical standard. And so: it is proven.

 

Once a corresponding MKSA unit system has been established, its internal quantities between different standards will have no influence on the actual mathematical physics: any such unitive Distance-Mass-Time-Current unit system will do.

THE MiUNIT — METER-INCH

rJ/100R16000             = 0.025400718 an automatic 0.0254 M unit if so rounded on the Planck Dmax mJ constant

2 ˇ (7336.81’’=d=bPETRIE/R) ˇ R^18 = 2(4534.40’’/R) ˇ R^18 = 2.539568549, rounded 2dec = 2.54 cM = 0.0254 M = 1’’;

2.54/(2ˇ R^18) = 7338.059780201’’, = 7338.06’’ Ļ PetrieTol ą40’’ — 7336.81’; min 7336.41’’ — this 2.54 definition is not valid.

— This was the (2017) original onset to a suggested definition of the MeterInch Unit.

— However, as seen, its applied precision does not really connect the Petrie specified tolerances. Instead, as below (Jan2024), taking the view from the rJ-CIRCLE pyramid, the Petrie tolerances are preserved — and a fully defined Petrie value explanation appears. The numbers 18, 58 and 16000 are explained as partial factors inside the Golden Section R = [(√5)–1]/2 geometrical mathematics:

16000 = 5 ˇ 2 ˇ 2 ˇ 2 ˇ √2 ˇ √5 = 5 ˇ 8 ˇ √2 ˇ √5 = (58 – 18) ˇ √2 ˇ √5 = 40√10 = 5 ˇ 8 ˇ √10.

One INCH (1’’) equals 0.0254 Meter (very close to rJ/100R16000); One Meter (1M) equals 1/0.0254 = 39.37007874’’.

Precision: 2.5400000 / 2.5400718  = 99.9972%, inv. 1.000028278.

 

The MiUNIT in this (Jan2024) 2020-complementary presentation

(not mentioned in the 2020 version)

rJ/100R16000             = 0.025400718 an automatic 0.0254 M unit if so rounded on the Planck Dmax mJ constant

is however still on the same profile as the one from the 2017 original:

2 ˇ (7336.81’’= d = bPETRIE/R) ˇ R^18 ; b/R = d ; b/d = R ;

= 2(4534.40’’/R) ˇ R^18 = 2.539568549, rounded 2dec = 2.54 cM = 0.0254 M = 1’’;

Similar to 1/100th

= (6ˇ18 + 8)/100 ˇ    R^18 ˇ 40√10       = 0.025394546 ≈ 0.0254 (M) = 1 INCH

= (108  + 8)/100 ˇ    R^18 ˇ 40√10       = 0.025394546 ≈ 0.0254 (M) = 1 INCH

= 116/100 ˇ              R^18 ˇ √16000     = 0.025394546 ≈ 0.0254 (M) = 1 INCH

= (217 – 101)/100 ˇ R^18 ˇ √16000      = 0.025394546 ≈ 0.0254 (M) = 1 INCH

Primes  7  31  101:

7 • 31 — 101 =116

 

Special:

ģTrivialģ:

There is at least one special equivalence between a defined negative x-coordinate value (xBhigh -1499.7016293661’’  line crossing DeLIC trigonometric evaluation, tunnel cross) and a same positive value y-coordinate from the GS system matrix details

y            = 1499.7016293661’’ = b16(Ŋ + R3)/√5 = 4555.88(Ŋ + 0.2360679775)/2.2360679775

             = P(Ŋ + R3) = 2037.4499030105 × (0.7360679775)

             = b16(1/2√5 + R3/√5) as GS deduced [ Queen chamber level / North Gallery level details]

SEE DETAILS IN The5.

 

CheopsATLAS2024.ods Tabell2 A55+

— xBhigh — as calculated through the common line crossing equation DeLIC.

— ģComparing a traditional  solution with explicit Golden Section System Matrix solutionsģ — example.

— Same value: [P=b16/√5](Ŋ + Rŗ) = [b16 = 4555.8764838817](1/2√5 + Rŗ/√5)

— ģDiscovered by arithmetic identificationģ. [BUT IT IS TRIVIAL ..]

•   Proof (trivial):

— Given the EarthrJCIRCLE MiUNIT 1’’ = 0.025400718 M, and the Resolution 217 definition of the Petrie measured Cheops Pyramid half base 4534.40’’ with a 99.9999832% certain confidence, connecting the Golden Section matrix system solutions Cheops Rectangle bd=h˛ mathematics, it would be rather sensational if we could find one Petrie measured detail in the Cheops Pyramid complex, that does NOT apply. Don’t forget to update.

•   Compare: EntrancePETRIE — proving the Golden Section connection.

 

 

These (additional Jan2024) results suggest that the present academia idea of the origin of the Cheops Pyramid

based on the idea of a primitive human technology : no PLANCK CONSTANT, no LIGHTSPEED IN VACUUM, no EARTH RADIUS ON NEUTRON MASS DENSITY, no ATOMIC MASS UNIT

will vaporize — be proven so — to exactly nothing. We welcome a disclaiming — related — argument: Still searching ..

 

 

Consequential Mathematics — COMA

CONSTRUCTORS’ CONSIDERATIONS — basic math:

Compare — 1’’ = 0.0254 M: whole number simple plan solutions

In the Golden Section GS numerical whole number operators

THERE IS ģAN AUTOMATIC Meter-INCHģ UNIT IN A NUMERICAL (PREFERABLY WHOLE NUMBER) TREATISE ON THE CheopsRectangle-GEOMETRICS — provided rJ-guided:

 

rJ/100R16000             = 0.025400718 an automatic 0.0254 M unit if so rounded on the Planck Dmax mJ constant

                                      = rJ/4000R√10                         ;

(rJ)        = 100(0.0254)R√16000          ; (rJCRĻb16)

             = 198.566539706 M = (18ˇ222+9/2)(0.0254)R√10 — ģTheConstructģ ą0.5’’

-------------

rJmax    = 198.57924 Ļ 198.5665 + 0.0127

rJ          = 198.57215 ..............    OK: 198.566539706 + 0.005615072 Ļ + 0.221065826 ’’

rJmin     = 198.55384 Ļ 198.5665 – 0.0127

———————————————

CUV — The INCH factor: vindicating the two pyramid levels, and the different units — within the Petrie tolerances

PROVIDED THE INCH UNIT WAS KNOWN .. OR VALUES WERE SO ROUNDED TO FORM SUCH A METER UNIT 1 ’’ = 0.0254 M.

— We use the Petrie given whole pyramid base (2× 4534.40 = 9068.80)’’ ą0.5’’ tolerance for the entire (7817.80’’) rJ measure.

(ą0.43’’ if we use the more regular Petrie associated ToleranceAspect: max 198.583072, min 198.561228).

16000 = 5 ˇ 2 ˇ 2 ˇ 2 ˇ √2 ˇ √5 = 5 ˇ 8 ˇ √2 ˇ √5 = (58 – 18) ˇ √2 ˇ √5 = 40√10 = 5 ˇ 8 ˇ √10.

PetrieCRĻb58     = 58R√16000 = 4534.196576’’, = 4534.20’’ ;

16000                = [(PetrieCRĻb58)/(58R)]˛

 

 

TheUNITS Ļ FullyRelated  Ļ Explain217 Ļ FirstPROOF Ļ MiU Ļ Special Ļ INCHref Ļ rJprim

 

TheFACTORS:

The58factor:

Connecting

SECOND rJ-CHEOPS PROOF

The 58 factor  .. 5 ˇ 8 + 18 = 58 ..

bĻPETRIE/rJ       = 4534.40’’/198.572154778 M ; apparently very close to 0.58:

                          = 0.580009620                          ; rounded simple whole numbers only

                          = 58/100

                          = (5 ˇ 8  + 18)/100                    ;

-------------------

bĻPETRIE           = rJ(58/100)

                          = 4534.324794148’’                 ; this value is within the Petrie tolerance 4534.40’’ ą 0.25’’

-------------------

ALL VALUES INSIDE THE PETRIE GIVEN TOLERANCES ARE LEGIT AGENTS IN FINDING THE PLAN OF THE BUILDING.

.. no ..... yes ..... no ..

 

TheUNITS Ļ bPETRIE 4534.40’’ ą0.25’’ Ļ max 4534.65’’ — min 4534.15’’

ExactComparingBasics — redundant NOT REALLY A unit defining PROOF

 

------------------------

Given (PetrieCH6.25) the Petrie INCH measuring standard with two rounded decimals, type half pyramid base

bPETRIE = 4534.40’’, we (first GU Ļ MiUNITintro Ļ ExactComparing — MiUNITcomparing) found

The 18 factor     PetrieCR

2 ˇ R^18 ˇ (4534.40/R) = 2.539568549               ; rounded [ multiple = 1 ]

                                       = 2.54 (cM)                   ; the rounding works exact up to multiple 11: 27.94’’

b/R =          4534.40/R  = dPYRAMID                 ; the ideal GoldenSection Petrie pyramid wall length

                                       = 7336.81’’                    ; 186.355058 M — could not be Petrie measured, no casing

 

Planck constant TNED related NeutronSquare atomic mass defect top scale: 18 e: ģThe Entire Openingģ.

THE ENTRANCE:

Roof 18 (FLOOR 19) — the stone masonry (ActualCheops) levels, see PETRIE BREAKS THE ENIGMATIC ICE.

Basically the main (rJCR) mathematical ģenigmaģ behind the inner details is solved here.

------------------------

 

The 16 factor √16000

CUV 

4534.20                PetrieCRĻb58                                            58R√16000.0 = 4534.196576        ; = (rJ’CRĻb16=198.5665M) ˇ 58/100  = (100R√16000)k0

4534.32                Petri2CRĻb58                                            58R√16000.9 = 4534.324098        ; = rJ(58/100)/0.0254

4534.20                PetrieCRĻb58 = rJ(58/100)/(rJ/100R√16000 = 0.025400718)            ; = 58R√16000  = 4534.196576

4534.20                PetrieCRĻb58                                                          4534.196576        ; = rJ(58/100)/0.025400718 

√16000             = 5 ˇ 2 ˇ 2 ˇ 2 ˇ √2 ˇ √5 = 5 ˇ 8 ˇ √2 ˇ √5 = (58 – 18) ˇ √2 ˇ √5 = 40√10 = 5 ˇ 8 ˇ √10.

 

IN LABORATING WITH THESE TIGHT, NEAR AND RELATIVELY CLOSE VALUES — ALL WITHIN THE PETRIE ADVISED TOLERANCES, otherwise we are smoked — WE SEE THAT THERE ARE SEVERAL OFFERING OPENINGS IN COMPARING AN IDEAL PETRIE GOLDEN SECTION PYRAMID PetrieCR WITH THE rJCR TNED-PLANCK-Dmax RELATED DITTO.

 

THE PETRIE MEASURED CHEOPS PYRAMID BASE 4534.40’’Ļ 4534.32’’Ļ 4534.20’’ CAN APPARENTLY BE CALCULATED FROM THE DEFINED (GS) BASE GOLDEN SECTION PYRAMID’S CIRCUMSCRIBED (Queens chamber centered) rJ-CIRCLE — THROUGH BASIC GS WHOLE NUMBER EXPRESSIONS ON THE COMPONENTS TYPE 2, 5 AND √5 SOLUTIONS, (Powers of) THE GoldenSection Constant R, AND ON A (most precise) GENERAL METER-INCH DEFINED CONNECTION (ROUNDED BY A PETRIE INCH STANDARD of 2 DECIMALS):

rJ/100R√16000             = 0.025400718 an automatic 0.0254 M unit if so rounded 0.0254 M = 1 INCH by the constructors of the building on the Planck Dmax mJ constant rJ

 

 

THE FACTORS: 16  18  58  Ļ  The58  Ļ  bPETRIE  Ļ  The18  Ļ  The16 

 

CALTEP: ChEX  — CALCULATING THE PETRIE VALUES

 

 

CheopsATLAS2024.ods Tabell2 A1+

28Jan2024

WE EXPLAIN AND FOLLOW THE RESULTS IN THIS PRESENTATION

 

 

exemplified 14 FIRST DIRECT CALCULATED PETRIE VALUES

BASED ON PYRAMID AGENT16

PROVING GS CHEOPS PYRAMID GOLDEN SECTION MATRIX SYSTEM

One single independent triangular trigonometric connection

explains how bPETRIE 4534.40’’ ą 0.25’’

PETRIE CHEOPS PYRAMID

MEASURES UNITES GOLDEN SECTION MATRIX SYSTEM

MATHEMATICS CALCULATIONS

exemplified [14] FIRST DIRECT CALCULATED PETRIE VALUES BASED ON PYRAMID AGENT16 —

rJ’ = 100R√1600  = 7817.580303394’’ = 198.566539706 M  AGENT16

  = rJ’/k0 = (100R√1600)/√[(2/√5 + Ŋ)˛ + 1] = 4555.876483882’’= 4555.88’’

TROUGH THE PETRIE PYRAMID HALF BASE DEFINING RESOLUTION 217: 7 • 31 =  217 = 116 + 101 = 108 + 8 +101 = 2•3•18 + 109[PRIME]

bPETRIE            = [h – r/217]rJ ˇ √R = 4534.399236463 Ļ = 4534.40’’

                                      = [5795.3282841311’’ — 5963.8883839628’’/217][0.7861513778] = 4534.3992364633’’

bPETRIE            = [b/√R – b(1/R + 1)/(2ˇ217)] ˇ √R

bPETRIE            = b[ 1 – (1/R + 1)(√R)/(2ˇ217)]  = 4534.399236463’’; match to Petrie’s 4534.40’’: 99.9999832%

b = rJ/k0 × 0.0254 ; rJ = 198.572155 M =

= 6.62559E-034/299792458*(3*5.975E+024/(PI()*(1.0086652*1.66033E-027)^4))^(1/3) Ļ OpenOfficeCalcCELLcode

MiUNIT: rJ/100R16000 = 0.025400718 selected rounded unit: 1 INCH = 0.025400000 M

It is fundamentally doubtful the Ancient Egyptians knew this — without advanced support from already enlightened.

 

 

 

14 FIRST direct article linked CONSECUTIVE 14 — RECURRING CONSTANTS AT THREE SITES — recursive simple whole numbers at several sites: 108 = 2 • 3 • 18 ...

bPETRIE 4534.40 Ļ eCh 47.31 Ļ h 37.97 Ļ xG 4228.00 Ļ yG 1181.23 Ļ yA 668.15 Ļ Pangle 26° 31’ 17.5’’ Ļ Hangle 26° 28’ 58.55’’ Ļ yB 172.90 Ļ xB 1570.70 Ļ yPG 1658.17 Ļ PC 4534.20 Ļ

dSTEP 35.01 Ļ  yKING 1693.17 Ļ and further in this presentation ..

 

 

ALL VALUES PCS WITH REFERENCE TO THE Pyramid North base tip [ on a remaining casing stone ] PETRIE PYRAMID PAVEMENT:

y=0, with pyramid x-valuens leftwards as negative extension [Petrie gave these positive values]

Beginning from the entrance — ending ideally on the original casing, of which only a few base stones remain today

CALCULATING THE PETRIE VALUES

CALCULATING THE Petrie values of the Cheops PYRAMID — Petrie’s 19th Course (Petrie Breaks The Enigmatic Ice)

 

PetriePyramidAngle: CALTEP

Petrie, as quoted on the Cheops Pyramid Angle:

 

This Wikipedia Image has been Sharpened and bottom [ merged ] contrasted

to enhance the contour  and contrast [ and brightness ] in the foreground parts.

 

WIKIPEDIA Cheops Pyramid [ 29Jan2024 ], Casing stones.

Credit: Jon Bodsworth — egyptarchive.co.uk, Copyright

PetrieCH6.25:

” On the whole, we probably cannot do better than take 51° 52’ ą 2’ as the nearest approximation to the mean angle of the Pyramid, allowing some weight to the South side.”.

PetrieCH6.24Ļ32 (WholeQuote): ” N face, by entrance passage mouth ..

.. 51° 53’ 20’’ ą 1’  ” ;

 = 51.888888..°.

   The measurements of the Pyramid sloping angle only had the few remaining casing stones at the pyramid base. Petrie concludes (in giving a scale of weight/importance

0-10 for the different measuring parts):

” From all these considerations the above weighting was adopted. It is clear that the South face should not be included with the North, in taking the mean, as we have no guarantee that the Pyramid was equiangular, and vertical in its axis.”.

;

PetrieCH6.32.r56: ” entrance passage angle at mouth 26°29’ ą 1’, entrance passage height 47.26”.

PetrieCH6.32; ” mean doorway height Ļ by measuring courses Ļ 37.94 ą .17”.

PetrieDataSourceREF.

 

 

The Cheops Pyramid is a GS Golden Section Matrix System Construction, no doubt — complex mathematics and physics: Petrie’s measures GS calculated

RADIOCARBON DATING ON THE STONE MASONRY MORTAR SETTLES THE DATING ISSUE OF THE CHEOPS PYRAMID: 2 871 – 2 604 BC

THE WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE (Great Pyramid of Giza, alias our Cheops Pyramid [the ancient Greek name]) has a section named Radiocarbon dating. It states seemingly definite compelling evidence on the dating of the stone masonry edifice, The article says

” Mortar was used generously in the Great Pyramid's construction. In the mixing process ashes from fires were added to the mortar, organic material that could be extracted and radiocarbon dated. A total of 46 samples of the mortar were taken in 1984 and 1995, making sure they were clearly inherent to the original structure and could not have been incorporated at a later date. The results were calibrated to 2871–2604 BC.”

   That information was not observed in this production (2017+) until now (29Jan2024). The Wikipedia info above makes the presentation of the calculating results in this, and the previous parts, even the more interesting (extendingly extremely so very much more: scenario below). The observed lapse (the Glaciation Arguments) between — some at most 15 000 BC to 3 000 BC — has now received a new, stronger attention (NorthAtlanticGlaciationQuotes);

ASSEMBLY SCENARIO:

A sophisticated computer controlled system of air borne robots assembled the building in max 67 days. Tell me I’m a liar:

ATLANTIS GEOLOGY FRAGMENTATION urges a geologically independent technological platform: The Atlans builds Large Tech Plants (LTP) situated in high altitude, high above Earth ground: permanently parked (Consequential mathematics). Once established — autonomous robotics maintenance: clean energy from E=mc˛ — the parking has no time limit: perfectly clean energy directly from matter (TNED — basic fundamental knowledge NEVER INCLUDED IN PRESENT ACADEMIC COSMOLOGICAL IDEAS on the true nature of the atomic universe: Planck constant, The Neutron. knowing that the atomic nucleus has an integrated current trap

THE NUCLEUS IS A CURRENT REGULATED DEVICE, which can dissolve the entire nucleus into clean mc˛ energy — as sometimes happens ąe pair annihilation naturally in very strong atmospheric discharge, see TGFintro). No physical aspect can destroy That Culture, once realized. So, continuing the scenery on consequential mathematics: LTP has smaller MigrationShips (MS), frequently visiting Earth ground stations — for educational/mission, food and general material provision and maintenance purposes. But: The non Atlantis Earth bound populations develop slow (and sees the Atlantis people as “gods” — while millennia  passes); A growing egoistic, selfish and violent and power greedy mentality develops among the less educated (THE UGLY SIDE OF THE INNER HUMAN NATURE THAT ONLY KNOWLEDGE CAN CONQUER);

— Around some 5000ya (3000BC), the remaining Atlantis humans (here named Atlans) realizes a coming end:

— Either we must destroy what is left of our original high tech Atlantis. Or: give the E=mc˛ power tech machinery to these lovely and very beautiful Earth ground bound growing bald forest cutting Ego Suckers [Elucidating the noted situation]

— safely destroying humanity in total — which we won’t. So: Let us build Reminders, Pyramids (Cheops Pyramid), for a far future generation to sough out, in better times with better provisions for the love of knowledge than this present of ours. After assembly: We set The Timer, use our MS:s to go down to Earth ground a last time, leaving our LTP:s self directing with our MS:s to self destroy on travelling into the Sun. We leave not one itty bitty tiny no single trace of our High Tech culture — except in the type Cheops Pyramid (TNED, rJCIRCLE).

— Now. reader (the final countdown): tell me I'm a liar — all ancient history problems solved, down to the last atom, unless disclaimed.

— The previous scenery (here in UH) has taken the view that the Pyramids already stood there at the time of the beginning of the early Egyptian (and Mesopotamian, and Sumer [and Indus]) civilizations. Some of the textbooks on the early civilizations date the birth of the Egyptian (explained as ”sudden”) civilization around 3 000 BC. Comparing Quotes in: CameronQuote, SCENARIO, Early Civilizations.

— With ”The Mortar Dating Argument”, a ģThird Alternativeģ has opened, possibly (or not at all); The specification ”2 871 BC” as a most remote date (provided exact dated) would — then — (definitely) mark the actual (never answered question on the) birth of the (often sudden termed) beginning of the Egyptian civilization.

   Or as Cameron puts it:

— ” But the troublesome is that it seems to have originated suddenly.”.

— The Suddenly Aspect then takes an even more concrete contour on the most early mortar radiocarbon dating: not farther back than 2 900 BC. This presentation proves once and for all that the Egyptian culture or any other early human civilization as we know them, did not have the provisions in physics and mathematics to realize the geometry of the building — as it is exposed and unveiled in this general comparing test. So, by that standard unless disclaimed: Explaining History has taken a great leap ahead. Also suggesting: The Glaciation Arguments do urge a deeper investigation: NorthAtlanticGlaciationQuotes.

 

 

Testing method — rJCIRCLE Golden Section caculated values versus Petrie measured

———————————————————————————————————

Similar to ChEX as explained in METHOD: Projecting the GS (GoldenSection) matrix geometrical body over our PetrieCP given measured Cheops Pyramid, we search/scan for structural congruities. It seems we have 7+1 (F) basic points (The7: KGLHBMA) on the GS body’s ARCtanŊ line. Using the GS body fractal matrix circle-square alignments, we seek such aligning reference xy-points to calculate the values for all significant points. Then we take it further from there, testing if the results have any further lead — which they definitely have, indeed.

 

See the appending separate section in The7BEGIN and the following. We use a simple (DeLIC) line crossing trigonometric connection by which we receive xy-point values where crossing lines need a solution. Pyramid SCALE: Half Pyramid base (bPetrie 4534.40’’) equals 100 pixels. The following text will use and relate the results from The7.

 

EntrancePETRIE: PetriePyramidAngle

 

HOW PETRIE CALCULATED THE ENTRANCE — we have no record of that, only the actual trigonometric triangular mathematics

rJCIRCLE GOLDEN SECTION MATHEMATICS INCORPORATES PETRIE MEASURES

 

SecondResult: — TheTHICK19th: FirstResult Ļ CALTEP

 

 

Equations in PREFIXxSIN  Ļ AsDeduced :

THE ONE SINGLE TRIGONOMETRIC CONNECTION

h = e cosA/cos(A+B)     Ļ Deduction Ļ PREFIXxSIN 

e = h cos(A+B)/cosA     Ļ e/h = cos(A+B)/cosA Ļ cos(A+B) = (e/h)cosA

(h/e)cos(A+B) = cosA   Ļ acos[(h/e)cosΣ°] = acos[cosA]  

Σ° – (acos[(h/e)cosΣ°] = A°) = B°     ; Σ° –  B°  = A°  Ļ iterative solutions

cos(Σ°) – (e/h)cosA  =  0                        ; Σ° –  A°  = B°  Ļ iterative solutions

UNITES PETRIE’S MEASURED CHEOPS PYRAMID WITH (GS)

CHEOPS RECTANGLE GOLDEN SECTION

MATRIX SYSTEM:

BUT NON THE LESS, EVERY PETRIE CHEOPS PYRAMID MEASURED DETAIL MUST BE PROVEN CONNECTED TO THAT MATRIX SYSTEM QUANTITIES — WITHIN THE PETRIE STATED TOLERANCES — BEFORE  A TRUE AND GENUINE RELATIONSHIP CAN BE STATED AS REAL STEEL TRUE (C19thITERATED).

— ģWe are just warming upģ.

 

h = e cosA/cos(A+B) Ļ  Using the ChEX result

 

e = h cos(A+B)/cosA Ļ e/h = cos(A+B)/cosA Ļ cos(A+B) = (e/h)cosA

 

eTUNNEL 47.3055758’’descending tunnel parallel height, value fron FirstEX

Result:

Illustration corresponding to Petrie’s PlateXI.4

PetrieCH6.32e         :

PetrieCH6.31+;

” mean doorway height Ļ by measuring courses Ļ 37.94 ą .17”;

 

Petrie Provisions           measured e A B — measured h — never what we know mentioned as calculated

e = 47.26” (ą 0.17)

A = 51° 53’ 20’’ @PyramidNorth, PetrieCH6.32.r56

B = 26° 29’ ą 1’ PetrieCH6.32e as quoted

h PETRIE                      h = 37.94’’ ą 0.17’’  PetrieQuote19th

PetrieCH6.32r31Ļ2;

” mean doorway height Ļ by measuring courses Ļ 37.94 ą .17”

rJCR Provisions            calculated e KNOWN  A B Golden section matrix system Cheops Rectangle math from bd=h˛ — calculated h

e = 47.31” Ļ 47.3055758’’

A = 51° 49’ 38.2525’’ = ARCtan(1/√R)

B = 26° 33’ 54.1842’’ = ARCtanŊ

h rJCR                           h = 37.97’’       Ļ 37.9658061814” — approved: within Petrie’s stated  tolerance

 

CHECKING PETRIE’S SPECIFIED h THROUGH THE TRIGONOMETRIC EQUATION given eAB:

h PETRIEcalculated      h = 37.96’’       Ļ 37.9640039644”  

Course19th: ResSEC

CheopsATLAS2024.ods Tabell1 A54+

 

The rJCR candidate share values well accepted inside the Petrie given tolerances (ą 0.17” quoted below).

— With both angles AB known and the tunnel height e the fourth horizontal parameter h can be calculated as shown above by the trigonometric h-connection.

Given the fix metrics of course h and sloping tunnel e, the connecting angles AB can have variable values independent of the fix he quantity. As one set of these  independent AB angles apparently connects to the Golden Section Matrix system, a principle bound connection already exists to any other he preserving AB set.

— However. Also all other details of the edifice need be proven Golden Section matrix connected by explicit alike mathematics — if a true definition will hold.

— But what we know: Petrie never mentions any calculation of the h-parameter, only the statement

PetrieCH6.32r31Ļ2;

” mean doorway height Ļ by measuring courses Ļ 37.94 ą .17”

— It appears that Petrie does not use the triangular connection SecondResult at all. This we can settle by using the triangular equation in the following manner:

Σ° – (acos[(h/e)cosΣ°] = A°) = B°     ; Σ° –  B°  = A°  Ļ iterative solutions in PREFIXxSIN

— Inserting Petrie’s measured he values 37.94 and 47.26 together with Petrie’s stated descending tunnel angle B = 26° 29’, allows us to iterate up the B angle value.

That is what a Petrie inevitably land surveying trigonometric technique would have had to observe — Petrie’s corresponding Plate XI as ”(CASING RESTORED)” —

PetrieCH6.32e :

 

in his corresponding and concluding statement (over the above)

51° 53’ 20’’ ą 1’ (corresponding to Petries specification on the North pyramid wall PetrieCH6.s24):

C19thITERATED: C19th

 

CheopsATLAS2024.ods Tabell2 Q19+ — PROVING A  never observed mathematical PETRIE CONSOLIDATED CONNECTION TO the GS GOLDEN SECTION MATRIX SYSTEM SOLUTIONS

 

— Iterative Method (Equation): We add or subtract numbers to the A+B cell (with Enter after each change) with purpose of nullifying the central yellow colored cell, as expressed. The fixed input values are h/e and the Petrie tunnel angle 26° 29’ = 26 +29/60 degrees.

— The solution says 51° 49’ 34.66’’. Only 3.59 arc seconds from score.

— The solution says 51° 49’ 34.66’’ — pretty much the GS Golden Section Matrix Cheops Rectangle Casing Pyramid’s ARCtan 1/√R = 51° 49’ 38.25’’.

— Not at all Petrie’s 51° 53’ 20’’.

That proves that Petrie did not calculate his stated casing angle, unless we have missed something. THE EQUATION AND ITS RESULTS PROVES, CERTIFIES AND VINDICATES A GOLDEN SECTION SOLUTION — THAT APPARENTLY NEVER WAS OBSERVED BY PETRIE.

   This author does not intend to question Petrie’s results. No way. The thing is that we (ģnormal acesģ) in our time have immensely much more mathematical power aid (computers) than the people around Petrie’s Cheops measuring, some year 1880. Maybe the actual (iterative) trigonometric equation was not even familiar — or perhaps inconvenient to use, or other reasons.

   Petrie’s ” The answer has been already given in the list of determinations of the casing angle” (should be the Weighted listing in PetrieCH6.s24), ” It requires an angle of slope of  51° 53’ 20’’ ą 1’ ; and this is so close .. that it conclusively clenches ..”, radiates a for us unknown mathematical assurance. That detail has not been observed earlier in this UH production (never so calculated); The Petrie he values and his stated tunnel angle 26° 29’ (our deduced Hangle) apparently closely defines a direct 19th course Golden Section connection, the trigonometric solution says.

C19thCHECKED: Ci

CheopsATLAS2024.ods Tabell1 A65+

 

— We can check the ģnever Petrie used trigonometric equationģ results more precisely as above in adopting the recent above iteration result 51° 49’ 34.66’’ — a clear Golden Section Pyramid indication — that apparently Petrie never used together with his measured e partner 47.26.

— Adopting directly the Golden Section Cheops Rectangle mathematics A° = ARCtan 1/√R angle in the Petrie line and using again the direct equation

h = e cosA/cos(A+B) with Petrie’s e = 47.26, we now get the Petrie

h = 37.94 comparable to the previous Petrie calculated h = 37.96 — with Petrie’s own stressed and specified A° = 51° 53’ 20’’.

The mathematics holds — exposing that very small (0.03’’) variations inside the Petrie (ģalmost hugeģ) specified tolerances (here ą 0.17) have ģdevastatingģ consequences to The Quest Is or IsNot Golden Section Pyramid associated — from Petrie’s given data. Concluding like this: it, a Golden Section system mathematics association, is practically impossible to miss, provided using the trigonometric mathematics. The 19th Floor it is. 18th Roof. (Petrie, breaking the enigmatic ice).

— Meaning: These (Ci) mathematics trigonometric equation examples, as they say, point out that Petrie’s data really do provide a definite connection to the Golden Section Matrix Pyramid system — through Petrie’s thoroughly described 19th course stone masonry (heB). The Petrie working group (1881-1883) apparently was shielded not familiar with from using its proving content — unless we have missed something. We definitely have no covering access to the archives, so we cannot say for sure. As already noted earlier, these are reserved for already Educated Cookies: no human right mentioning. Not one word. Cheops Pyramid is Cheops Rectangle bd=h˛. Disclaim.

 

 

Explain: C19th

A FIX h VALUE ”by measuring courses” CERTIFIES — THROUGH THE CONNECTION

h/e = cosA/cos(A+B) Ļ PREFIXxSIN — A DIRECT PROVABLE LINK TO THE GS GOLDEN SECTION MATRIX SYSTEM’S CHEOPS RECTANGLE PYRAMID bd=h˛. MEANING:

— As the Course19th equative Petrie-GS-example shows, different angles have the (Petrie tolerance) same end station h-result: the mirror-angles have no decisive mandate :

— The building has a GS-associated PLAN at least there. It — the plan, ģthe architect’s blueprintģ — is different from the actual construct which can be deduced from the plan (ContractedConstruct).

— ģWe are just warming upģ.

— In order to really proove the Cheops Rectangle status of the Cheops Pyramid, we, hence, must find every single Petrie measure, within its tolerance, to a regular Golden Section Matrix mathematics calculation, or such system matrix identification. Every. However: The Resolution 217 has already provided us with the basic arithmetical MiUNIT proof through the EARTHrJCIRCLE value: the bPetrie 4534.40’’ half Pyramid base fundamentals

— with a certain 99.9999832% confidential match. Dodge that one, if anyone can. Meaning: it is already standing there:

bPETRIE            = b[ 1 – (1/R + 1)(√R)/(2ˇ217)]  = 4534.399236463’’; match: 99.9999832%

b                       = rJ/k0 × 0.0254 ;

rJ                       = 198.572155 M =

= 6.62559E-034/299792458*(3*5.975E+024/(PI()*(1.0086652*1.66033E-027)^4))^(1/3) Ļ OpenOfficeCalcCELLcode

MiUNIT: rJ/100R16000 = 0.025400718 selected rounded unit: 1 INCH = 0.025400000 M

It is doubtful the Ancient Egyptians knew this — without advanced support from already enlightened.

FirstExercise:

The first excercise from that outlook: Deduce the actual e from the Golden section system. Please.

 

Explain  eTUNNEL 47.3055758’’descending tunnel parallel height

THE FIFTH RESULT:

Summing — compare FirstEX — Ch, corridor height numerically by Scale: 47.3055758’’

Vh = c               = yATH + yBlimit + BUARM + (bOFFSET – 18)/2

                          = 52.8886555437’’ Ļ 52.89 , × √0.8 =

Ch                    = 47.3050516137’’ Ļ 47.31 ; 47.3050516137’’   Ļ Ch:1Ļ 47.3055757984”

Compressed from GS Golden section matrix

Cheops Rectangle rJCR system:

the constants appear recursively: Tunnel cross B, Gallery ramp top PG, and Pyramid North entrance A

CheopsATLAS2024.ods Tabell2 A1+

BUARM           = abs(xBĻA16 – xA58)/2                    ; B-point Upper Ascending ROOF Mean average, or

                          = 3.5682917806’’   Ļ 3.57                       ; ģupper ascending ROOF averaged mean differenceģ

yATH                = 2(yBhigh – yBlow)                              ; same Bhigh intersecting vertical on the ideal ARCtanŊ sloping corridors

                          = 43.3696399875’’ Ļ 43.37                     ; marker for decending and ascending basic passage height determination

bOFFSET         = bĻA16 – bĻA58                                    ; the two Pyramid agents’ half pyramid base difference

                          = 4555.876483882’’

–  4534.196575969’’

                          = 21.6799079131’’ Ļ 21.68                     ; ģ the final sealing ģ:

 

yBlimit               : TunnelCROSS — absolute Construct Limit HBA floor:

yHangleBend    = abs(xH – xB)tanHANGLE – yB

                          = -0.6338339337’’                                  ;

yPangleHend     = abs(xG – 10R – xH)tanPANGLE  +  yG + n

                          = 3.6463097198’’                                   ;

yConB               = yHangleBend + yPangleHend             ; absolute HBA construct limit floor base

                          = 3.0124757861’’                                   ;

d                        = 2.1323680500’’                                   ; basement G section details Ļ Construction plan level G

D                       = [d/cos(PANGLE° + C°)] cos(C°)      ; C° = ARCtan(1/√R)

                          = 1.7116318595’’                                   ;

SIO                    = n – D                                                   ; secure inspection offset — SIO illustrated

                          = 1.0982940329’’

yBlimit               = yConB + SIO                                      ; absolute Construct Limit HBA floor

                          = 4.1107698190’’                                   ; PI-valueAlternative dependent Ļ 4.1112567233

18                      = see MiUNIT                                       ; as used — when it is offered

---------------------------------------

nHYPO             = √ n2 + (n/2)2  = 3.1497590802’’         ; difference to pi = 0.00817’’ Ļ should be OK to use, inside margins

L                        = | xG – xA | ˇ √ 1.25                              ; xG — xA = d ;  dHYPO = √ d˛ + [d/2]˛ = d √ 1 + 1/4 = d √1.25

                          = 4135.3383474429’’                             ;

PANGLE°         = ARCtanŊ – ARCtan(nHYPOĻπ/L) 

                          = 26.5215239127°

                          =    26° 31’ 17.486086’’                         ; slightly less than ARCtanŊ

Petrie                 = ” 26° 31’ 23’’ ą 5’’ ? ”                         ; PetrieCH7.36e as quoted

---------------------------------------

c                        = 10R – n                                               ;

                          = 4.7753769413’’                                   ;

e                        = cTanPANGLE

                          = 2.3831554097’’                                   ;

d                        = eSinPANGLE                                      ; PREFIXxSIN Ļ Construction plan level G

                          = 2.1323680500’’

LAH                   = 2yA√1.25                                            ; 2yA = xA

                          = 1487.7416175918’’                             ;

HANGLE°        = ARCtanŊ – ARCtan(d/LAH) 

                          = 26.4829296551°

                          = 26° 28’ 58.547’’                                  ;  2’ 18.94’’  less than PANGLE

Petrie                 = 26° 29’ ą 1’                                         ; PetrieCH6.36e as quoted

                          ” (4) entrance passage angle at mouth 26° 29’ ą 1’  ”

Difference          = 1.453’’                                                 ; ARCseconds — well within Petrie’s tolerance ą 1’

---------------------------------------

ACTUAL EXPLAINING FIGURES AND ILLUSTRATIONS — IN LINKED SECTIONS.

PetrieQUOTE19th: 2ndResult

PetrieCH6.s31+;

” mean doorway height Ļ by measuring courses Ļ 37.94 ą .17”;

—————————————————————————

Petrie gives a long description of his method (Petrie Breaks The Enigmatic Ice)

in determining the descending passage — with respect to its (projected) end on (the original, long ago lost) Pyramid casing. The reasoning includes observations of several other similar (nearby) pyramids, showing a similar edificial principle solution.

 

”.. the vertical height of the doorway on the sloping face ..” clearly exposes the Petrie idea as the triangular hedABd illustration suggests — unless we are deeply mistaken. Petrie gives the end picture in his short table:

 

So, there shall be no doubt on what site Petrie is aiming at; 37.94 ą 0.17 it is:

 

 

 

See further in ExplainA

 

 

CALTEP  Ļ Num217REF Ļ PetriePyramidAngle Ļ RadioCarbonDating Ļ EntrancePETRIE Ļ SecondResult Ļ THICK19th Ļ EquationSecond Ļ ResultSecond Ļ Course19th Ļ EquationSecondITERA Ļ Stressed5153 Ļ C19thITERATED Ļ C19thCHECKED Ļ Explain19th Ļ FirstExercise Ļ PetrieQUOTE19th

 

MENU:

 

Concerning Flinders Petrie’s thorough Cheops Pyramid measures (1881-1883)

MENU — PROVING EXCELLENT CONCORDANCE BETWEEN PETRIE’S MEASURES AND (GS) rJCIRCLE-GOLDEN SECTION MATRIX SOLUTIONS

—————

The TEN RESULTS link section namings (First .. Second .. Tenth) is a rest from the first draft in this presentation,

exposing the first ten results where Petrie’s measures concur with the Golden section rJCIRCLE calculated values.

They are listed below in a separate group.

—————

PREVIOUS ABOVE:

—————

RITa —  APPENDIX Resolution 217

EARTHrJCIRCLE —  Revisitring CheopsRectangle2017 — enhanced version Jan2024

Resolution217 —  proving Petrie’s Cheops Pyramid half base inch quantity

First — ChEX, first corridor height example

CALTEP — CALCULATING THE PETRIE VALUES

Second — 18th, TheTrigonometricEquation — PROVING THE GOLDEN SECTION MATRIX SYSTEM PRESENCE IN PETRIE’S MEASURES

 

ALL THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

The7BEGIN — preparing for Petrie value definitions: xyG and xyA Ļ GpointParams Ļ FIRSTyxA Ļ

BpontDetermination —  preparing for Petrie value definitions: xyB Ļ xyBPetrie Ļ GSBsolutions Ļ DeLIC Ļ BupLowOrg Ļ Bupper Ļ BPco Ļ BPAL Ļ Blower Ļ CORIH Ļ LineCROSSxy Ļ

xPAref Ļ xBhigh Ļ yBhigh Ļ ResultBpoint Ļ

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Height18 — HAS a Stage 1 Ļ SolutionA Ļ DIVA Ļ THEnFACTOR Ļ IdealAndConstructAngle Ļ nSymmetry Ļ PetrieROOF18 Ļ THEn Ļ Npin Ļ ConfirmingPetrie19th Ļ ThirdResult Ļ rJCIRCLEverified Ļ

y18ROOFcon Ļ EXTRECON Ļ HanglePangle Ļ CDetailsH18 Ļ ExtraCON Ļ nHYPO Ļ Rot125 Ļ PANGLE Ļ PetriePangle Ļ EighthResult Ļ dREF Ļ HANGLE Ļ PetrieHangle Ļ NinthResult Ļ ConPlanG

GregionFactors Ļ Results123 Ļ

PETRIExA Ļ ExplainA Ļ RevisitingTheAngle Ļ PETRIExARelated Ļ INcon Ļ ConfirmedPetriePoints — short summaryĻ

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FormatingBUARM-yATH — COMPLETING the B POINT REGION DETERMINATION — and its Casing Connectivity Ļ

— SUBTERRANIAN TO CASE  — nFACTOR — Hangle and Pangle — preparing definition of Petrie’s B-POINT : the tunnel cross Ļ Stage 1

yATHcalc Ļ BUARM Ļ yATH Ļ yBarm Ļ yBlow Ļ yBlo Ļ bOFFSET Ļ yATHsymmetry Ļ TUNNELcross Ļ

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

yPG Ļ BconnectingPG Ļ PetriePG Ļ yPGcalc Ļ PyramidCenter Ļ

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EPA — EntrancePassageAngle — SIO, yBlimitCALCULATION — SIO: yConB yHangleBen + yPangleHend

PetrieTol017 Ļ yBlimitCALC Ļ yBlimit Ļ yHaBe Ļ yPaHe Ļ yConB Ļ Dsio Ļ SIO Ļ yBlimitALG Ļ PetrieBpointCalculated Ļ FourthResult Ļ yBPetrie Ļ xBPetrie Ļ xPetrieB Ļ CorridorHeight Ļ FifthResult

cLENGTH Ļ ChCORRIDOR — Ch2Ļ

TCC — THE CONTRACTED CONSTRUCTĻ TenthResult Ļ TranspositionPLANtoConstruct — the tunnel cross Ļ ContractedConstruct Ļ ContractedConstructVerified Ļ ResultTunnelCross Ļ SeventhResult Ļ EXcontractedConstruct Ļ Course19thHeight Ļ SixthResult Ļ

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

dSTEP  — upper Gallery Ramp end Ļ dSTEPcalc Ļ yKING Ļ yKINGcalc Ļ

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TUNGAL  — collective illustration, Tunnel cross

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SIOillustrated  —  SECURE INSPECTION OFFSET

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TheDpoint  Ļ xyD Ļ EGSf Ļ ExplainDetails Ļ xyDalgebra Ļ The5 Ļ Compiled Ļ

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GalRES21Feb2024  — GALLERY RESOLUTION 2024 Ļ GalHeightIssue Ļ

SmythTol Ļ GallerySouthWall Ļ GalleryAnglePETRIE Ļ TrigMETH Ļ PetrieHypoGAL Ļ GalleryRoofSlopingAngle Ļ GalRoofRampDetails Ļ GalleryRAMP Ļ PetrieGalRoofPros Ļ PetrieGalleryRoofDetails Ļ

GalleryRoofInvest Ļ SawToothRoofing Ļ iDSangle Ļ NominalGalleryHeight Ļ GalForceConstruct Ļ

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summing  Ļ