**EARTH MASS ¦ UNIVERSUMS HISTORIA** | *a*
production 2021XII10 | Senast
uppdaterade version**:** **2022-01-03** · Universums Historia

innehεll
content *denna sida* · webbSΦK **δ****MNESORD** *pε
denna sida* Ctrl+F · sφk δmnesord φverallt i * *SAKREGISTER · fφrteckning alla webbsidor

**IRTeP**
IMPACT REFERENCE, THE PROOOF¦ **CheopsATLASportal** ¦ CHEOPS
REKTANGEL bd=h² ¦ CHEOPS
PYRAMID Flinders Petrie 1883 ¦ **mJ** ¦ SyreFiltret

UniverseSAND
¦ **TGATE** ¦ **ITeM**
¦ SIU ¦ AndTER ¦ SandTRAVEL ¦ **TheTOTALcount** ¦ SHOW ME A SHORT DENSE OVERVIEW ¦ EarthMassFindCON ¦ **11%** ¦ SUM

**THE ANDROMEDA TEST** AND *The mass of the Earth *EARTH POINT* and the cosmological gravitational constant *G (Gtest) *and* **NATURE**

**See the constants
explained in ****Gtest****. Four of
them are not included in present known established science. See description in ****EarthRADalt****. G = 6.67 t11 JM/(KG)². See ****TEST****.**

**NATURE UNCOVERS
AN ATOMIC PRECISION SYSTEM OF EARTH'S MASS-EQUALITY WITH EARTHS SURFACE
ISOTOPIC DISTRIBUTION AND COMPOSITION.**

**WHAT WE KNOW:
such a communicating equality system would be impossible to uncover find
unless so already set up by nature herself from the same order as that at work
in the periodic system: the nature of biological
structure for building: life. Flowers. Fully and perfectly orchestrated
purposefulness: Chance=Random=0. Perfect structure (as in crystals: our WOMAN:
»our mother of the universe». Perfect assembly: »Ill pay to see you WALK»). **

jH2O ¦ **BioGAS** ¦ BioEK1-10 ¦ TheTEN ¦ AR123 ¦ CWON ¦ CAP ¦ MATIK NEUTRON
NUCLEAR PRIMARY BIOCHEMICAL
MATRICES¦ THE PERIODIC SYSTEM ¦ Inner distribution of elements

** Earths mass cannot be
measured in any precise or exact way even if implied a constant with ± 0
atmospheric mass flow in-out. Changes on the surface (Moon tidals), in the
crust (continental drift and land elevation) and the inner parts attest a
continuous change of references that is setting up a definite limit for
(consistent stable time) measures (1 tidal ocean/tidal mass: 1.4 T21 KG or roughly 0.023% of the
Earths mass).**

**THERE ARE
ADDITIONAL Earth Mass exact EQUALITIES for each one of the
combining/communicating isotopic constituents see ****jH2OCHART**** for
overview such as **

**mJ** = (C12rem/**2628**)(**1460**BioEK3[**1475**BioEK11460])(**S/c**)² + 2cT23 = **1.68 T19**/3t6
+ **3.75**T23 = **5.975 T24** KG 2628 = 1460·3²/(2+3) periodic system constants 2_6_..

**THE SUBJECT IS
PERFECTLY ABSENT IN MODERN CORRIDORS AND QUARTERS: not even by far such
cosmological theories in mathematics exist therein.**

*Resonant
Structures. **Basic
primary biochemical matrices** *CAP. No random. No
chance. No mother god loving way.

Exact Earth mass. *Apparently*.

Exact atomic structure. *Connecting
status*.

Exact nuclear physics. *Gravitation
and electricity*.

EARTH MASS CAN IN NO EXACT WAY
BE PRECISELY MEASURED even if implied a constant with ± 0 atmospheric mass
flow in-out. REASON: Changes on the surface (Moon tidals), in the crust
(continental drift and land elevation) and the inner parts attest a continuous
change of references that is setting up a definite TIME MEASURING limit for
consistent measures (1 tidal ocean/tidal mass: 1.4 T21 KG or roughly 0.023% of the
Earths mass). So: how is it?

Exact balance (cMARG ¦ BEKS) all for LIFE apparently
provable by mathematical precise relations between isotopic quantities.

*Water and plants: photosynthesis agents Leaf&Needle during 3Gy of
undisturbed natural evolution: »a temple of knowledge».*

* 100% preserved biosurface up to 1800 when industrial deforestation
breaks the order: >30% removed
to 2000. Alarm.*

**STATE attacks
its own internationally asseverated societal contract** .. of the greatest importance .. Marker :
what 30% can you spare? Do share greatest.

PERFECT ASSEMBLY. No flaws. No
errors. What built life: sun energy transfer agents. Perfect beauty .. until ..

COMPARE MEASURING THE
PRESENT ACTUAL MASS OF OUR SUN BY KNOWING A PRESENT
ANOMALISTIC PERIOD 365.2596425d USING THE KEPLER
CONNECTION

*m*S = (2π/*t*)^{2}R^{3}/G
WITH THE PRESENT KNOWN R=1AU=1.4959787 T11 M AND G=6.67 t11 JM/(KG)², WE *by
principle* ONLY NEED ONE REVOLUTION PERIOD FOR THE *t* PARAMETER:
BECAUSE THE EARTH-MOON SYSTEM ELLIPTIC ORBIT AROUND THE SUN *anyway* IS
AFFECTED THE LEAST OF OTHER SURROUNDING MASSES[]. THEN A
MOST PRECISE KEPLER CALCULATION IS POSSIBLE FOR FINDING THE NEAREST MOST
PRECISE MASS OF OUR SUN (**1.989661830 T30** KG: Wikipedia: **1.9885 T30**
KG: 99.942%). BUT THIS RESULT MUST BE *attested and so* VERIFIED BY ANOTHER (ORBITAL INDEPENDENT)
MEASURE: THE SUNS PHOTOMETRIC EFFECT (IAU VALUE: 3.8275 ± 0.0014 T26 W). A
GENERAL TNED PHYSICS COSMOLOGICAL CALCULATING TEST, INCLUDING ALL COSMOLOGICAL
PARAMETERS, WAS PERFORMED (Oct2018) FOR SUCH AN IAU TEST. See ResTAB. RESULT: THE TNED TEST ARRIVED
DIRECTLY AT THE IAU FIGURE ON 3.827500021 WITH G = 6.67 @3.827500000 WITH G =
6.67000002. THE RESULT ATTESTS AND CERTIFIES THE SOLUTION AND CHOICE OF
CONSTANTS: THE INSTRUMENTAL EPOCHS STANDARD VALUES DID PASS THE TEST NOT THE
PRESENT COMPUTER EPOCH STANDARD.

WIKIPEDIA on Gravitational
Constant mentions the Earth-Moon system and its orbit around the Sun, where the
text says 2Dec2021 .. the measured quantities contain corrections from the
perturbations from other bodies in the solar system and from general relativity.. What type of issue the general
relativity aspect is in concern of is not further mentioned. NASA Jet
propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Solar System
Dynamics gives some additional information on the moving objects in the solar
system. The text informs on a coordinate timescale .. is the independent variable in the numerically
integrated second order relativistic
differential equations of motion. We should NOTE that ingredient in
general modern academic ideas of our solar system content. In TNED it has no representation. Compare:
The Perihelion Rotations. As far from
Einsteins relativity as far can come on same exact end math.

**purposefulness perfect assembly**

NATURE UNCOVERS HARMONICS *a tremendously well
constructed purposefulness*

The electron masses of an atom in a solid cooperate in
preserving the atoms neutral state. The neutral state takes no input energy to
exist.

The electron masses also cooperate over neighboring
borders to form precise crystalline structures over vast space volumes with
high precision symmetry and resistance against stress. In building such a
system of harmonics, all components give individual contributions. But the
system in total will not be uncovered, understood or explained by only looking
at the individuals contribution.

A full
understanding of the entire building will arrive only after appropriate study
in all of the total common harmonically preserved structural connections.

NATURE SHOWS SUCH TYPE OF
PURPOSEFULNESS in the middle of Her stunning beauty AND She takes my breath
away Completely. I am in a simple manner HOME inside of Her. No chance. No
Random.

So the PRINCIPLE of NATURAL DISCOVERY »the full order
of knowledge» is already drafted on such resembling atomic foundations: The
whole is understood ONLY through and by co-working individual contributors
forming a harmonic foundation (a *symphony*).

TimeLINE ¦ Suns
Photometric Effect IAUtest

THE QUEST OF A **FIX** EARTH MASS
QUANTITY

* How did it come?*

**CAP** ¦ Primary distribution of elements inside Earth ¦ DIAsquare ¦ BaseCHART ¦ CELESTIAL bodies building time from Dmax to Dnormal¦ Modern
academy: water from
the outer

jH2O ¦

**Basic reason: Modern academy
never had a solid atomic nucleus and its universe to take the stand FROM: the
neutron: Planck constant h=mcr: The
Planck Ring. Instead, a different, more academic kind of a
universe was invented by academic consensus. Only leading to a dead end wall of
contradictions demanding magical and mystical entities to be accepted.**

**Modern academy
limited its own invented idea of our universe by frankly postulating
limitations to our own understanding, proclaiming a new kind of logic: the
theory of relativity. In TNED it is ****PLANCK
EQUIVALENTS**** giving the classical physics
detailed explanation to every single part and piece of the atomic universe or
not at all. See ****Fig.1**** above: lights gravitational dependency with the central mathematical
generator collected for comparison; The Einstein original, the complementary
Schwarzchild expression, and the all theories enveloping ****TNED**** deduced ****Cheops Rectangle**** mathematics solution (here only the static part, there is also an
additional dynamics part for expansion-contraction): the natural constant c0 is
preserved independent of gravitation: ****atomic
nucleus deduction**** as the
fundamental form of gravitation.**

EarthPoint: EARTH

**Wikipedia source found to the figure 5.9722**[]** **Found21Nov2021@search5.9722

Present
Wikipedia specifications (Nov2021) refer a value

5.9722 ± 0.0006
T24 KG as a new established value for the mass of the Earth.

But Wikipedia,
and others, just give references to sources themselves also just reporting the
actual number. No explanation or reference seems to exist in these sources
telling how or from where the value as such has come. Recently (21Nov2021) an
explaining source was fond in

ourplnt.com/mass-earth-neutrinos/

OUR PLANET
THE MASS OF EARTH: SCIENTISTS USED NEUTRINOS TO MEASURE

But THAT the explaining part of the
figure 5.972.. was Not the hot spot of the story:

FIRST:

Using this method, the researchers
calculated the mass of Earth (M⊕) between 5.7Χ10^{24} kg and
7.6Χ10^{24} kg.;

According to the most precise
gravitational measurement, the Earths mass is M⊕=(5.9722±0.0006)x10^{24}
kg;

Researchers say clearly, albeit within large uncertainties, both
results are in very good agreement. ;

SECOND the
actual hot spot:

While scanning the interior of
Earth using neutrinos, a team of scientists from Spain also used these
subatomic particles to measure the mass of Earth. Their result is in agreement
with the current best estimate, which was
measured using the value of the gravitational constant (G);

They published their findings in a
study titled Neutrino tomography of Earth on Nature Physics..

G, it was.
Depending on the G-value OldG6.67 or newG6.6743 significants we arrive at
respectively 5.975 or 5.972 from a simple expedition EarthMassFINDmethod of averaging Earths equator-polar
ellipsoid in finding a »best fit»: A resulting ideal sphere to hang the mass on
applying the industrial standard Earth surface (45°N/S) gravity value g =
9.80665 M/S². Case closed.

It isnt the mass, then. It is the G with
a bottom line:

Neutrino measures (as reported in the source, and its specified between 5.7Χ10^{24} kg and 7.6Χ10^{24} kg) are (at present) no more accurate than
earlier estimates and measures. We study that by detail below.

*The point:*

25Nov2021 TNED-physics

EARTH MASS

Results from the general cosmological Oct2018IAU-test
with the following (2020+) CAP-CWON-AR123 results DO question the present
established INTERPRETIVE end results from reading the (accurate in themselves unquestionable) instrumental measures in
concern of the TNED to be noted:
bio-cosmological: noMACphysics results:

the gravitational constant (G:
IAU-test by significants says):

G: .............. **6.67000002**) [same as HOP1967oldG] and

the mass of our Earth (*mJ*: CAP-CWON-AR123
by significants says:

*m*J: ............ **5.97500000**) [the VNS1967 value].

PRESENTLY CLAIMED 2021 MODERN VALUES (Wikipedia
Nov2021 has the articles and figures; Gravitational constant, Earth mass):

G: .............. **6.6743** ± 0.0015: **passes not the
IAU test, see ResTAB
and too: far from**:

*m*J: ............ **5.9722** ± 0.0006: **destroys shreds
the BioEK1-10 CAP-CWON-AR123 results**:

including parts of already established quantitative specifications such
as 1mSEA = 1.4 T21
KG

(from NASA and others; Wikipedia, Water: 1.386 ; BKLXII1928sp464: 1.37
).

TNED-physics not only suggests but too aims at proving in detail a general
explanation for these (grave) differences

(Modern Academy Relativity Theory versus
TNED physics Planck Equivalents) of type:

»corrupted end results» due to
a GENERALLY BAD irrational COSMOLOGICAL THEORY:

faulty incorporated non physical parametric theoretical parts *more
invented by academic consensus than deduced*.

jH2O ¦ IRTeP ¦ CAP ¦ BioEK1-10 ¦ TheTEN ¦ AR123 ¦ CWON¦ CWONsum ¦ PrimDATA ¦ **Oct2018IAUtest**

Our SUN stands in
the middle of this expedition: the photometric effect and its instrumental
measure (the IAU value attested by TNED). It is the irrevocable fact. And so
the rest SHOULD apply as well. Everything else would indeed be strange.

Gtest: EarthPOINT

*Cheops Atlas
Series** Present*

PRESENTING THE RESULTS IN ENGLISH FROM THE ORIGINAL
PRODUCTION (Oct2020-Nov2021) IN SWEDISH

HOW THE CHEOPS RECTANGLE DID CONNECT EARTH MASS 5.975 AND
THE *»old school»* UNIVERSAL GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANT **G** = 6.67:

* It was a general cosmological **TNED test
on the IAU photometric effect** as measured from our sun: *3.8275000 ± 0.0014 T26 W

= 6.670000000 t11 JM/(KG)^{2} ¦

This value was attested in the Oct2018
IAU Sun Photometric Effect 3.8275 ± 0.0014 T26 W General
Cosmological TNED TEST ResTAB matching on
3.827500021

through an 365.2596425d [ENCARTA 99 ¦
Wikipedia 360 Anomalistic
orbit period] anomalistic Kepler Third calculated @present Sun mass
1.989661830 T30 KG

with Earth-Moon mean elliptic major
axis [BA1978s161sp2: Cambridge International Astronomy] 2AU: 1AU = 1.495 978 70 T11 M.

r0c ...... 1.544177741 T26 M: r0c is
the TNED calculated K-cell/universes expansion radius on it maximum power time
point (T0=16.3Gy. see K-cell heat physics chart in MathLISTiau)

u ......... 1.66033 t27 KG, part of/in
instrumental epoch standard constant values found in library encyclopedic
literature [here denoted IES 1960-1999]:
atomic mass unit C12/12

h ......... 6.62559 t34 JS, IES Planck
constant

nU....... 1.0086652, neutron [ n ]
mass in u [Dalton] units [U] in TNED occasionally denoted mn

c0 ....... 2.99792458 T8 M/S, top speed
light propagation value [ divergence ] in vacuum; gravitational frequency and
wavelength proportionality give same value independent of space region

**18** ...... NEUTRON
SQUARE ATOMIC electron MASS SCALE INDEX see atomic, not
nuclear, mass defects define experimentally measured atomic masses in TNED
physics. See THE
NEUTRON.

mSbegin ........... **1.99272**242808046 T30 KG, Sun mass from
day one 20.805Ga the TNED physics deduced K-cell [UNIVERSE]
heat physics with our Sun as a NORM star [SUNeq123].

m0cK ............... **4.16143**338129800 T53 KG, **K-cell
mass**: TNED calculated mass of the cosmic central electromagnetic active
K-cell [our UNIVERSE] in result from the Oct2018IAU
test, as the above.

m0cK ............... **4.16143**250743896 T53 KG, **K-cell
mass**: TNED derived: 36[mSbegin]^3/[
Dmax^2 · 2**nU**^6 · pi^5 ]; Dmax in G-rank: Dmax = (**nU**u)^4·(c0/h)^3/4
= 1.821772972866 T17 KG/M³.

EarthRadius: Gtest

*Earth radius and local gravity constant (the g) can be
measued with relatively simple methods depending on level of ttechnology but
not mass or G or D*

FROM »FRED FLINSTONE» SCRATCH *depending on level of
technology*

EARTH RADIUS IN
TWO *different* SIMILAR WAYS

EARTH Radius BY

**surface distance and angle**

**Concurrent
(equatorial) observations at different locations same time data. Known
distance (s) between two angle comparing locations.**

EarthRADalt: RADIUS

EARTH Radius BY

**by altitude and angle**

**Time independent
(equatorial) observations preferentially with sea level preferences (Moon
tide effects add small variations). Known altitude and angle.**

G = w² r/ m2 360° TIME INDEPENDENT
centrifugal equilibrium condition:

BECAUSE differences in body shape and inner and surface [crust] tidal
changes and fluctuations, no DIRECT exact instrumental G measure is
physically possible: there are no ideally 2 isolated masses.

The only physical way to extract »the exact
G value» is through an entire cosmological calculating
process where all its significant properties are exposed to the G-factor
if at all possible.

BECAUSE ONCE FOUND IF AT ALL
IN SUCH A COMPREHENSIVE OUTLOOK, NOTING CAN UNDO IT: all other excluded. So:
it is a question of Whether the calculus DID succeed or not:

** Did we miss any** or maybe somone yields » The Quest is
irrational» please share ..?

AS CERTIFIED IN RESULT BY THE
[Oct2018 IAU test] IAU MEASURED SUN PHOTOMETRIC EFFECT 3.8275 ± 0.0014 T26 W as attested on the
instrumental epoch standard values only, see ResTAB:

**G = ****6.67 t11** JM/[KG]²
featuring a »the ideal provable cosmic biotopical exact value» **to be refuted by anyone** capable of
giving the mathematical and physical argument. Searched for,
non yet found.

NOT **in
explicit** INCLUDED IN MODERN ACADEMY 1800+: **r0c 18 mSbegin
m0cK** [there is a corresponding mass value, but no present
academic theory connects to TNED cosmology].

Because the TNED deduced Neutron mass density D*max* = (*n*U*n*)^{4}(*c*_{0}/*h*)^{3}/4
the G-rank can be written alternatively (*r*_{0c}/*m*_{SBEGIN}^{3})D*max*(*u*^{4})(*h*^{3})(*n*U)^{10}*c*_{0}^{5}16π^{5}/18.

EarthRAD: ALT

PRESENT (2021) VALUES (*»in public most used»*)*
no (biotopical) exact values are known in this production*

6.378 000 000 T6 M ............. Earth equator radius (Req)

6.375 638 828 T6 M ............. Earth pole radius (Req/Rpol = 1.0034)

Req, Req/Rpol = 1.0034: BA1978s176Tabell10.1 Cambridge International Astronomy

SIMPLE MEASURES WITH FAIRLY GOOD RESULTS

* depending on level of technology (stop-watch, fine
sewing thread, metal washer, common industrial mM graded meter tape)*

EARTH SURFACE
GRAVITY 9.80665 M/S² 45°N/S

*The 9.80665 figure is from *TenSMIT2003 the World Meteorological Organization
value used for standard gravity at 45° latitude: we test our local
kitchen;

**A stop-watch, a
fine sewing thread, a metal washer, and a common industrial mM graded meter
tape. Back in time impossible precision tools that we today take for granted:
simple experimentation in physics with good results. The oblateness in the
figure above, featuring our Earth, is strongly exaggerated for clarity.**

** The CONICAL
PENDULUM is originally formed by a circulating mass hung from a suspension by a
thin wire. With a sufficiently small rotation circle radius (r) the conical
becomes »for very small angles» a practical conventional to and fro
swinging pendulum, as deduced above. Knowing the suspended length (L) and the
swinging period (t) 0-1-2 taken by
many counts then averaged the local gravity constant ( a) shows up as a
= L(2π/t)². Our kitchen example gave 9.8169309 M/S² at latitude
60°N.**

** By using a thin hollow washer air friction
is minimized and too gives a precision readout from the vertically hung meter
tape: horizontal washers g-line.**

9.80665 Earth
surface gravity constant [ g ]: TenSMIT2003 the World Meteorological
Organization value used for standard gravity at 45° latitude ¦

** **

** **

*Averaging the given 1800-1900s Req Rpol, adopting the industrial standard
g value of 9.80665 M/S², rounding by three decimals, and*

**

*reaching a quantity of Earth mass from old (1960-1999) and new (2000+) G
values whichever you prefer*

FINDING THE MASS
OF THE EARTH

THREE significant DECIMALS: TwoStepMean (*Equator is
closest*):

ROUND[([INT(1000*m*(Req)/T24) + INT(1000*m*(Rpol)/T24)]/2 + INT(1000*m*(Req)/T24))/2]ΧT24

= *m*EARTH*averaged closest to Equator Radius*

Taking the (1978 Cambridge
International Astronomy) 1900s specified Earth pole and equator radius figures

adopting g = 9.80665 M/S² (meanLAT45°) gives the
following result:

EMFmethod: FIND

There are several possible ways to perform some result
comparing calculations by several ways to test the (average) results,
depending on strategy.

Here we adopt the most simple:

Earths
equator (Req) and pole (Rpol) radius expose an
ellipsoid

not very far from an ideal sphere but enough so to
reflect some significant differences.

We use the
most simple elliptic connections to calculate/average mean (spherical) radii by
solving the ellipses *d*-length.

We use the *d*-length
result as a new ideal spherical radius for simulating or testing a (»best fit»)
gravitational Earth Sphere:

actual mass (*m*) arrives from an ideal spherical
radius (R), and an additional average density (D). No big deal. Just simple (3
decimal) numbers.

**Finding the mass
of the Earth through simple average calculations from (generally) known
premises.**

We use the specified (Cambridge International Astronomy)
figures on Earth's equatorial (Re or Req) and polar (Rp or Rpol) radii:

BA1978s173 Tabell
10.1 ¦ Re = **6.378 T6** M

**0.0034** = (Re
Rp)/Rp ¦ = Re/Rp 1; Re/Rp = 1.0034, = 1/E = R/*r* ; E = *r*/R =
1/1.0034 ;

These given we average in two steps summarized
as [(Re+Rp)/2 + Re]/2 where

R1 = (Re+Rp)/2 = *d*1
and

R2 = [(Re+Rp)/2 +
Re]/2 =*d*2

Each of these will feature an ideal spherical
radius. It connects the basic G*m* = *a*R² where we will use the
standard industrial

*a* = g = **9.80665**
M/S² (TenSMIT2003
the World Meteorological Organization value
used for standard gravity at 45° latitude)

Our calculations then arrive at

*m*0(Re)
........ = *a*(Re)²/G

*m*1(R1)
........ = *a*([(Re+Rp)/2])²/G

*m2*(R2)
........ = *a*([(Re+Rp)/2 + Re]/2)²/G .

We limit the end *m*-results to three
decimals applying standard mathematical calculus INTEGER and ROUND functions
on the same average type as in handling the R-values, giving (*extract below from the OldG6.67 candidate illustrates the
detailed course*)

*m*(R)
........... = [(*m*0 + *m*1)/2 + *m*0]/2

The resulting *d*(R) values are treated as
elliptic *d*:s, which we convert to corresponding (projected) C° values,
giving

C1° ............... = *acos*
(1/*e*)√1 (*d*1/Re) = 45.0243093833° ¦ PREFIX** x**SIN

C2° ............... = *acos*
(1/*e*)√1 (*d*2/Re) = 30.0210480786° ¦ PREFIX** x**SIN

These C-angles will correspond to the ideal
(end) Earth sphere and its ideal circular form.

OUR RESULTS with
OldG6.67 and newG6.6743:

**Comprised result
in details. Two different end results appear from the two different G value
sources: ****OldG6.67****00, as quoted above, and newG6.6743 (present 2021 established science:
value from Wikipedia Nov2021). The end result in Earth mass is respectively mJ
= 5.9750 T24 KG and nJ = 5.9720 T24 KG. In specific, both solutions, the second
and final averaged C-angle is close to or equal ****The 30°N****/S latitude
where the first (known 3+) human civilizations appear: The Nile (Egypt),
Euphrates and Tigris (Mesopotamia), Indus (Harappa and Mohenjo Daro), Yellow
River (China). Apparently this latitude also connects to prominent
geological/topological sites: highland mountains with large river systems: a
natural place for humans to evolve on their specific culture.**

mJ ... = 5.9750 T24 KG MASS OF THE EARTH, old candidate: *same as the **CAP/CWON Earth** mass*

nJ .... = 5.9720 T24 KG MASS OF THE EARTH, new candidate (Nov2021Wikipedia: **5.9722
± 0.0006 T24** KG)

BOTH RESULTS THROUGH THE SAME MATHEMATICAL PROCEDURE
only difference is OldG6.67 and newG6.6743.

In some way, our (former encyclopedic) VNS1967 reference 5.975 T24 KG for Earths
mass is justified by this simple average and rounding exercise.

EMFdensity: Results ¦ Method ¦ FIND

DENSITY DETAILS D = 3*a*/4πGR

*a*:

Unless an ideal surface solid shaped sphere, D will be physically
impossible to measure in any exact nature.

That also (then) accounts for R given a fix G.

Specifications of Earth density
(D) will depend on idealized spherical or other morphological aspects. no exact
measure;

**varies with form** same
mass.

The problem is identical on the basic form G*m = a*R²: Even AS we
know a G*m*, the *a* and R fails: We are forced to TAKE on AT some R
to reach some *a*. Or, adopting an *a*, a corresponding R appears
with a given G*m*.

IN TNED PHYSICS, BEGINNING FROM THE K-CELL DETONATION AFTER A
PRECEDING CONTRACTION THE NEUTRON MASS DENSITY D*max* = 1.87 T17 KG/M³ *a
*(*n*U*n*)^{4}(*c*_{0}/*h*)^{3}/4^{
}*part in EartRADalt G-rank* IS ALREADY GIVEN,
EQUAL FOR ALL PRIMARY CELESTIAL BODIES in a closest possible physical sense:
perfect spheres: practically no rotation, only mechanical contractive forces
preceding *divergence
ignition* (active electromagnetism when local gravitation
enters a *c>0*
as the K-cell expands). SO, AT THAT MOMENT ALL PARAMETERS ARE KNOWN IN DETAIL (*The
Fusion Limit Mass in TNED can readily be calculated*).

EarthMassFindCON: EMFdensity

CONCLUSION *Compare: **The discovery
of Mathematics*

WITHOUT A PROPER
KEY ¦ EARTH CRUST
MINERALOGY: CWON ¦ CAP

*a full scale answer »with all the trimmings»*

THE QUEST OF A
FIX EARTH MASS QUANTITY

* is or has become, more or less, a meaningless
expedition. So: How did The Exact Nature ***5.975*** come *±<3GRAM?

CAP ¦ Primary distribution of elements inside Earth ¦ DIAsquare ¦ BaseCHART ¦ CELESTIAL bodies building time from Dmax to
Dnormal¦

WITH (MATIK ¦ PRIMARY
NEUTRON NUCLEAR BIOCHEMICAL MATRICES ¦ 2020+) THE SURVEY OF THE EARTH SURFACE'S ELEMENTS AND
THEIR ISOTOPIC COMPOSITION IN AtmosBiosLitos (atmosphere, biosphere with
hydrosphere, and lithosphere) 1900s collected geological data (PrimDATA) A MOST DEFINITE *highly
independent (previously hidden)* AND CONCLUSIVE INFORMATION ON THE MASS OF
THE EARTH DID ARRIVE.

ON THE 5.975 OldG6.67 FIGURE

NATURE UNCOVERS EARTH'S
MASS:

EXCEPT THROUGH CAP *concentric atomic production* WE CANNOT SAY HOW
ONLY THAT

AR1 with additional AR23 and others apparently certify how
Earth mass equivalents appear from the general Earth surface masses in the

jH2O Chart and its 1900s well tabled isotopic quantities,
distributions and compositions on Earth's surface. Their apparently complete
whole number solutions (CAP ¦ CWON) with mutual connections leave no doubt or room for
doubt on the quest of their origin:

**nature**. Perfect
Assembly **latest
seen 1812** (MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2).

BIOCHEMICAL EXPERTISE ON PLANET EARTH 2022+

DISCLAIM THIS IF
YOU CAN please

UN AND WHO WITH ASSOCIATED: DISCLAIM THIS GLOBAL TOXIC
ALARM:

*Cause:*

** **

**Exact****
VIRUS picture: what it is, what it looks like, how it evolves **MUTATES**
in universe, and from where, and under what conditions do disclaim the one
who can.**

Biochemical reaction potential maximum low energy loss
with highest/fastest chemical efficiency relates directly to mass/atomic
weight:

**1O16/O18=11.11%**; A natural self protecting forest field (Simard2012 ¦ DOLE1965 ¦ CWON) implements O16 for plant growth: basic amino acid and
protein biological chemistry for all life (Leaf&Needle OxygenFilter). If deforested killed
Leaf&Needle dumped on air CO2 excess, *air gases* by atomic weight the nearest oxygen replacement is
O18: number of atoms abundance ratio naturally-cyclic *photosynthesis* O16 to nearest O18 at ground level
(worst case) is: 1/150. You can do the math yourself on present geo-bio-data.

*Effect on significant loss of Leaf&Needle solar
energy up taking agents:*

The original (3Gy) Leaf&Needle O16 Oxygen Filtering
DNA-regulating agents for all life loses chemical binding force in proportion
to replacement of heavier elements: **natural biochemical fabrication has
ceased**. Come again. Say again:

UppropLMI ¦ ErrorAGENT ¦ DataSource:
Compiled from general Wikipedia articles [2020+]

**
the biochemical chains of molecular binding does not properly connect
any more;**

** it does not
matter how much artificially created biochemical juice the Pharm Industry
is pushing in:**

**
***biochemistry*** cannot affect, manipulate, change
or alter ***natural
life chemistry power*** OTHER than by attacking ITS NATURE:**

The academic
biochemistry elite on Earth have excellent insight into the biochemical
STRUCTURE but guaranteed zero knowledge of HOW it was assembled: The (1950+) Miller Experiments gave good fruitful onsets to the principle natural idea with good
results. But THAT is far from The Real F1
Engine Math Story down to the last atom:

D*max* **neutron nuclear** *chemical* matrices on all
without exception surface primary cosmic bodies later meteorite material for
proof and comparison

once assembled FROM D*max*, no power, force or other can change the content except by intrusion.
Come again. Say again. So: Do disclaim: Nature it is. Not modern academy.

** Lifes biological
system ***cannot be manipulated once assembled
by cosmological principles; modern academic chemistry has no knowledge of that
one as so provable by mathematics and physics alone down to the last detailed
atom: ***coupling
just continues to fail and fall mutate in extending detail until the
life decreasing cause is removed and natural health forest, Leaf&Needle
order is reinstated**.**
***Because life chemistry was never constructed mathematically physically
chemically cosmologically **assembled** to work on *OTHER* premises; as if reductions would be chemically
replaceable by a creature that Life aimed at to *PROMOTE, NOT KILL* so to
speak; as if life would have an ethical price. *IT APPARENTLY HAS NOT. Is
not decency a scientific subject care? Oh yes mama, it is. Very is:
Addressing the individual outside human-right recognition defines exercising
oppression (P1 UDHR10Dec1948).

Life does not
work on bargaining. More than 30% of the Leaf&Needle forest area was
removed 1800-2000 (ForestWORLD2012), and raising. With only less 70% left of the original
life building agency, the term natural apparently has lost its meaning: The
plague is caused by humanity on its violation upon the nature that made it:
Nature is defending herself from a real bad guy.

**STATE attacks its own
internationally asseverated societal contract**
.. of the greatest importance .. Marker :
what 30% can you spare? Do share greatest.

PERFECT ASSEMBLY. No flaws. No
errors. Leaf&Needle built life: sun energy transfer agents. Perfect beauty
.. until ..

We, humans, are were apparently looking at a most
highly advanced and fully ordered construct. No chance. No random. 100%
preserved natural evolution from a preserved naturally flourishing
Leaf&Needle solar energy up taking agency. Then something happened 1800+:
Humans began to remove more than 30% of the natural forest area, period
1800-2000. Source ForestWORLD2012. 200 years. More than 30%. Scream that from the Moon;
»Humanity went insane».

Why what was the reason? 100% intelligence. Natural
insight: 0%. With even less than 70% left, the natural has left humanity. A
state of global chaos has emerged piece by piece, little by little, until the
whole Ship was wrecked. 100% intelligence. Natural insight: 0%.

Are the leading
papers (Dec2021) full of any kind of type of self inquiring critique (»end this
biological life weakening madness NOW»)? Not one word. Not one sound. Not one
spot. 100% intelligence. Natural insight: 0%. *Pharm* industry. Say again.
Come again. Math Class.

»Stupid Ignorant Nature attacks us and *Pharm*
industry is here to fight it». No Forest Reflexion. Not one word.

NATURE 18May2021

WATER AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS SUN ENERGY
UP TAKING AGENTS: Leaf&Needle. 100%. Note that in explicit: **S and c**** today are
severely corrupted**.

Because: Period 1800-2000 [ForestWORLD2012] more than 30% was removed; the S/c
only counts with a 100% preserved Natural Forest.

States looting and sacking has
made something else. That is also a proof: STATE ATTACKS NATURE. And Nature
Answers: **Test this one:**

**Nature a Life Planet in Universe
is 1800+ under grave serious attack: an exact image of The Virus Power Mutating
Morphology?:**

** **

** **

** NATURE has entered a state of
defense against an intruder. Nature rules the universe. Not modern
pharmaceutical academy. Disclaim, the one who can.**

**
The world 2020+ has entered a state of Alarm. But few seem to understand
its gravity acting as if Nature is A Senseless Sucker Evil Stupid Attacker.**

THE WAY to Her heart? NATURE PROVIDES US WITH KEYS (profiled comprehensive
structures) leading us to the answers as speechless flat dead squared paper
leads us to *mathematics
and geometry* (music) leading to further keys for
further progress: **the history of science**. Mathematics and physics. Say
Im wrong: THAT WOULD BE the absolute foundation *definition* of CARE:

**Last reference 1812**: MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2:

**NATURAL HEALTH example: woman
after 3Gy only counts **with a 100% preserved** natural forest:
The ****S/c proportion in $****. **

**Nature. Reduced, corrupted,
compromised during 200 years period 1800-2000 by **more than 30%**
**[ForestWORLD2012]. Now 2020¦21+:**
global alarm [****Quinney2020****].**

INTEGRATED MOST READ SOCIAL MEDIA POPULAR WORLD NEWS *the
fact is: MOST@zero. Not one word.*

Leaf&Needle Global Plant Growth Oxygen16Filter: **11%** impoverished by Deforestation:

apparent tree death:

*Sweden mind caring national authority in universe:*

EXEMPLIFIED SWEDISH STATE GOVERNMENTAL INDUCEMENT IN
EXPLICIT **aim to kill** LEAF&NEEDLE (Sweden
2012+¦2020):

**Earth
humanity clear cut example of national governmental insanity** Sweden
(2012+) Oct2020-May2021: *apparent mentally exercising authority:*

* cut the
oxygen:*

WHAT REPLACES THE
REDUCTION?

biochemical depletion: *plants/animals have no longer
a natural existential right apparently increasing road corpses ..*

wildfires (USA+) growing amount of dead dry wood (*with
increasingly less natural wind damping*) apparently on an exploding
frequency;

General Global
Life decrease;

Life Force DNA
regulation tenability on decrease with decreasing Leaf&Needle solar energy
up taking agents.

**STATE ATTACKS NATURE** Part 1 **DISCLAIM THAT, ANYONE WHO CAN** *and these are the
provable facts Jan2022*:

MODERN
ACADEMY 1800+ SHUT DOWN DERIVABLE NATURAL INSIGHTS

During a rough 3 billion year (3Gy) period Nature has
evolved life on Earth in Universe on a (DOLE1965) recognized Oxygen16 Filtering BioGAS (CO2) basis. As here, emphasized by
a sole TNED cosmologically deduced CAP (**concentric atomic production**). It is attested in
CWON (**complete whole number solution**)
from Earth atmosphere and **crust isotopic composition** (*simple elementary force morphologically neutron
nuclear* matrices on the same *neutron decaying*
principles *with following exothermal fusion reaction* as in THE PERIODIC SYSTEM: *basic* MATIK). And so further certified on the **Top Earth Distributed Elements** *on the Earth mass equivalents*
(PrimDATA: 3 independent
1900s science data sources on Earth atmosphere and crust content); **In explicit** (jH2O):

C12orig → (**C12rem** + N14 + O18)**even** + (C13 +
N15 + O17)**odd**; A separate lower lying pure O16 layer with a top end
neutron/Hydrogen layer composes the actual Earth water bank (20[mSEA=1.4 T21 KG
also in NASA FACTS]): 1mSEA is the present Earth
surface water, 19mSEA are lithospherically integrated with crust materials (TimeLINE: CO-O
water Earth-crust in-boiling period)
from a primary resulting basic top layer (Detailed ¦ ICE) WITH *primary
biochemical matrices included* on the same exact general cosmological foundation as
all other primary celestial bodies **consistently and gallantly proved and
certified by meteorite samples**[].

**STATE ATTACKS
NATURE** Part 2 **DISCLAIM
THAT, ANYONE WHO CAN** *and these are the provable facts Jan2022*:

MODERN
ACADEMY 1800+ SHUT DOWN DERIVABLE NATURAL INSIGHTS

1800+: **The 3Gy life sustaining and evolving agency
ceases on human enterprise reduction of the Nature based Leaf&Needle solar
up taking biosurface energy**. During the period 1800-2000 (ForestWORLD2012) more than 30% (37% ¦ DEFORESTATION
GRAPH) of
the Leaf&Needle ground forest sustaining area is removed. A corresponding
air dumped carbon dioxide (ground CO2) based Leaf&Needle excess follows
as after a wildfire. But never allowed to return and reestablish a continued
the 3Gy natural biochemical balance. With the cyclic biogas reduced O16 from
deforestation killed Leaf&Needle solar energy agents the heavier (O18am) O18 is the only nearest vacant
oxygen replacement (*air
gases by atomic weight*, worst cases: heaviest
lowest, lightest above). The ratio on the available data sources show
there are 150 oxygen atoms O18 on each undisturbed naturally preserved Nature
Forest cyclic chlorophyll producing plant oxygen O16 atom. Little by little,
piece by piece, the 1800+ deforestation activity drives a forcing life power
reduction up to an inevitable point where a TIP a biochemical flip appears. The weakened biochemical transfer of molecular
buildings sooner or later drops in significant efficiency:
medical consequences appear in all life biology domains. Plants, insects,
higher animals: humans. It is NOT a virus. It evolves mutates spontaneously
*as headache from bad eating habit exactly as long as so promoted* **as
rust fragments solid iron**. No force, power or instance in our universe
exists that will or can stop the pandemic in such a situation other than
this: **Return nature forest to its intended life sustaining origin and stop
pissing on Nature as NOT The origin of Intelligence**.

SHE is it. And
order and health will return. Bottom line:

In a NATURAL TECHNOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF HUMAN CULTURE
1800+: MODERN ACADEMY missed the on-ramp. And bad too to the atomic bone. It
has established a general idea of scientific knowledge in humanity in a nearest
comparing level of: »worse than 1311». Have your say. Mathematics and physics.

*End of Latest World News* Jan2022. (NASA is building rescue
Arks for immigration to Pluto .. dont forget to bring battery ..).

As summarized by CWON through CAP,

MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2

attested by Earth mass equalities AR123:

**General atmospheric oxygen**
(O16¦17¦18) and hydrosphere (Earth's water bank jH2O) on the one hand and **cyclic
biogas oxygen** (O16 ¦ BioGAS)
on the other hand are **two different physical domains** (VoJ). They are also naturally *in
related physics details* assembled under different physical and
chronological circumstances (TimeLINE)
and conditions.

**None of these properties are known in present established quarters**. Compare the most prominent: water came
from the outside. Invention, not deduction and thereby a
provable in detail grave delusion characterizes the present established ideas
(1800+ ¦ The LIST).

Details in Photosynthesis (COMPLETE
GROW-DECAY PHOTO-CYCLE) clarify the present missing links (TheCENTRAL)
in established ideas: **Identical chemical ranks** completely different
interpretations due to the established water from the outside; It has *so
provably by detail* corrupted the whole foundational understanding of the *biological
*concept. The SD-transporter
DETAILS
IN THE KEELING CURVE explains why modern academy 1800+
missed the on-ramp: 100% PRESERVED NATURE FORESTS IN 1812 LAST KNOWN MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 STOCK
PROVES IN EVERY DETAIL THAT

**plants do not produce oxygen**
plants circulate growth oxygen (DOLE1965
¦ OxygenO16Filter)
inside the cyclic biogas ($=S+c+MLN)

severely
corrupted and compromised 1800+ by humanity:

**plants do not dissolve water**
(COMPLETE
GROW-DECAY PHOTO-CYCLE ¦ *a complete 100% recycling process
on waters intact transportation* ¦ EXPERIMENTAL
LIMITATIONS ¦ THE CENTRAL
GROWTH QUARRELING SUBJECT ¦ *there is nothing wrong with
the experiments only the knowledge of their conditions*);

**plants do not take growth
carbon from air**, but from water (BioEK4TableLOWER1999)
through the roots (CO2+H2O);

**plants do not take fossil
carbon** IF THEY WOULD THIS TREATISE IS A COMPLETE CRAP. See THE PETROLEUM
ORIGIN QUEST; *carbonic deposits (graphite, diamonds and
others ..) are made, or can so be understood to be made, separately by the same
principal *BASIC NEUTRON NUCLEAR MATRIX COMPOSITION*
as is the case with the basic biochemical matrices in example also in
meteorites*. In modern corridors, none of these alternatives are known (*except
*BERGOLJA*
some in the old school on the theory of petroleum origin*): **Not one
single atom**. The (BioEK1-10: TheTEN)
balance between atmosphere and lithosphere (fossil deposits) apparently
guarantee certifies and attests that the biospherical biogas ($=S+c+MLN) is sequestered held and
kept intact from any destructive or intrusive imbalance *so that it can
restore any intrusive impact by time: natures own healing defense*. This
was already clear from (Feb2017) The MAUNA
LOA PROOF. **The more alive killed Leaf&Needle, the more
The
Situation worsens**. *Present world nations are
constantly attacking Nature on all fronts senselessly acting as Masters of A
Universe they apparently understand nought of*.

Modern Academy Teaching System
1800+ is full of invented not deduced ideas and terms explaining a universe
that only exists in a mind of delusion. Provable in every detail in to the last
atom or not at all (The LIST).
The gain has always been INSTRUMENTATION artistry, craftsmanship, the real
steel of the deal. It will evolve.

RESULTS VERIFY OldG6.670
over newG6.6743

The newG6.6743
Earth mass 5.972 does not pass the AR123 jH2O whole number connecting
explaining complex (and too, far from).

See in explicit (CryP1 and CryP2 tests).

The newG6.6743
Earth mass 5.972 neither passes the specific *r*JCIRCLE CHEOPStest (PCt ¦ CheopsTESTET) which is understandable from
quite separate points of view: modern academy has no Dmax universe. Modern academy has by principle no possible
even theoretical connection to the test.

The Earth mass equivalents (AR123 ¦ BioGAS)

from the (2020 PrimDATA) Earth atmosphere and crust
revealed 10 foremost biologically communicating equivalents (TheTEN ¦
BioEK1-10) certified on a complete whole number solution (CWON) as attested by
the TNED cosmologically deduced matter physics and biochemical
nuclear general cosmological neutron matrix system as governed by the same TNED
deduced (ATOMIC NUCLEUS: The Planck *ring* Constant *h=mcr=neutron*)
force morphology as the TNED/CWON one deduced from

(Feb2017 *MaunaLoaProof* ¦ Outclass ¦ CompilEXP ¦ *Meteorite Proof* ¦ BioEK1-10 ¦ BioGAS ¦ CAP¦ CWON¦
AR123)

NUCLEAR MATRIX ALGORITHM in THE PERIODIC SYSTEM found
equal for all primary celestial bodies by

the physical and mathematical principle of concentric
atomic production (CAP)

AR123 ¦ BioGAS ¦ PrimDATA ¦ TheTEN ¦ BioEK1-10 ¦ CWON ¦ The Planck *ring*
Constant ¦ NUCLEAR MATRIX ALGORITHM ¦ THE
PERIODIC SYSTEM ¦ CAP

expose and attest an exactly provable cosmological
ingenuity of prominence in sovereign harmonizing biology, physics and
mathematics:

There exists
in our universe a general cosmological preference attesting a basic life
promoting harmony on already evolved species however effectively extincted
the last 200 years by inducements having no part in the attested:

A collective effort of prominently ignorant and nature
harassing movements, with no other authority than ability to attack, destroy
and deny continue to claim supremacy over nature, denying, destroying and
bullying human rights.

IF YOU CARE FOR MY PRIVACY, HOW COME YOU INTERRUPT ME
WITHOUT MY PERMISSION?

WHO INVITED YOU? AND WHEN DID THAT HAPPEN? PLEASE DO
SHARE.

Humanity is
apparently 1800+ explicitly under heavy destructive attack from humanity:

a senseless 100% morality depleted general fuck-up with
absolute zero interest in science:

no human right. Not one word. Not one spell. Not one
spot. A 100% claiming supremacy zero knowledge creep.

»DON'T BLAME DEFORESTATION
FOR THE COVID».

There are *deforestation profiting* movements and inducements all
over the world (2022)

seeking with all their might and power

to DISPROVE any all attempts claiming THAT type

A 100% PRESERVED NATURE FOREST WITH ZERO DEFORESTATION

IS THE ONLY FOUNDATION OF BIOLOGICAL HEALTH, SANITY AND

INTELLIGENT APPREHENSION OF THE BARE IDEA OF

A FULLY DEVELOPED TECHNOLOGICAL CULTURE. No exceptions.

Here is an excellent opportunity for these eminent human fellows to

claim such a THEIR VERY OWN personal final proof

ONCE AND FOR ALL TIMES EVER:

$ total biogas, S standing, c
cyclic: Leaf&Needle [The biologic Oxygen16Filter] we welcome
any related disclaiming argument. Search for, non yet found.

↑

»**We don't give a shit**»:

The MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2
BIOLOGICALLY BioEK1-10
CONCURRING QUANTIFIED AR123
PROVABILITIES OF mJ=5.975T24KG as founded (BioGAS ¦ jH2O ¦ CWON ¦ CAP ¦ MATIK)
ON ITS TOP SURFACE ISOTOPIC MATERIAL COMPOSITION, ATTESTING A 100% BIOLOGICAL
SOLIDITY ONLY on the explicit BioEK1¦**1475**
MLN1812 documented 100% Nature Preserved Forest Preference (TODAY 2020+ ONLY BY DEFORESTATION REDUCED TO **1254**
ADVERTISING A CORRESPONDING GLOBAL TOXIC ALARM EVEN SINCE **1962**) **is apparently autonomously** LOCKED **into
a position as to exclude any type, sort or nature of disclaimer**: It is
impossible to undo, break up or even question on any argumentative base, if
correctly apprehended as GRAVITATION and ELECTRICITY and HUMAN RIGHTS is.
Saying: There is no way to separate these other than this: »**We don't give a
shit**». Have your say.

*Explanation:*

HUMANITY IN
UNIVERSE has the ability to AFFECT

compromise, make seemingly corrupt, change

**only one** (1) of **The TEN** (BioEK1-10) mutually with *Earth mass* communicating biologically harmonizing attested and
certified equivalents (BioGAS ¦ CWON ¦ jH2O) from Earths (PrimDATA:
*3 independent 1900s science data sources on Earth atmosphere and crust
content*) AtmosBiosLitos general isotopic content (CAP ¦ MATIK).

**Namely this one** BioEK1:

The ratio of
the number of OXYGEN atoms in Earth's atmosphere AtmosO to the number of
CARBON atoms in the last documented known preserved natural not significantly
affected by human hand atmosphere 1812-100% Nature Forest Preference MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2

IS

**1475** = **n**ATMOS¦O χ **n**MLN¦C = BioEK1

The
corresponding *Deforestation part* only, the fossil part omitted
on the atmospheric accumulated CO2 (by 2020 ¦ >400ppmvCO2 *and still rising 2022*) is

**1254** *a globally biologically toxic alarm should have
been declared already year:* **1962** (*Deforestation37%*): the more deforestation
(KilledAliveLeaf&NeedleCO2+), the lower the value:

*biochemically** ***toxic alarm**. Plants
suffer.
Animals suffer. Humans suffer.

It is obvious
that the mJ=5.975 T24 KG Earth mass biologically attested
equivalent in BioEk1

MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2

does NOT hold for atmospheric Oxygen/Carbon **not at
all** *below* (neither over) the mineralogically bio-equivalents
attested 1475. **IT ***appears as*** A NATURAL HEALTH ****MARKER**.

*The ability to experience strong indignation on the
bare view of an obvious rape.*

With a closest 1474 the mJ=**5.975**
value becomes **5.60**166666666667.. . Not even the most famous modern
academic scientist will approve of that today *Nature result* says. No
mother god loving way. The closest adversary (EMFresult ¦ EarthPOINT) is the **5.972** one. But that
one passes not the MLN1812 preference test (CryP1). And so, not even close: »Do you surrender freely»?

So: The only thing the growing popular *deforestation profiting*
movements with continued eminent inducements all over the world (2022) will
have to (continue) to do in declaring their continental faith in economic
progress IS now, be welcome, and more direct openly a more stringently
underlined proclamation once and for all, clearly:

»**We don't give a shit**».

Perfect Assembly.

There is no other left
alternative, as we know. *And there apparently never was*: CARE.

* Vad kul att du engagerar dig ..* MSokt2020

.. ladda ner appen ..

Och medan du δndε δr pε vδg ut kan du ta med dig
soporna ocksε.

SUNmass: 1Dec2021 Compilation

*m*S = **1.989661830 T30** KG TNED COSMOLOGY ONLY

PRESENT *attested* ACTUAL MASS OF OUR SUN

*m*S = (2π/*t*)^{2}R^{3}/G

DYNAMIC ACTUAL MASS THROUGH KEPLER'S THIRD *m*S = (2π/*t*)^{2}R^{3}/G

One *precise possible* Sun Mass Calculation

SUN LOSES MASS CONTINUOUSLY WITHOUT any here known MASS
INFLOW

BUT IT NEEDS A SPECIFIC (EXACT) G-VALUE (first 1798 by
Cavendish within 1%) FOR DETERMINATION

which can only be tested to fit by iteration ..

The only known way in this presentation of finding such
an »exact» G value is (any other suggestion is welcome)

BY TAKING AN ENTIRE UNIVERSAL COSMOLOGICAL »ALL ESSENTIAL
PARAMETERS» CALCULATION

*»**all explained in one**» leave no one behind: everybody
is entitled to share in scientific advancement and its benefits*

In a (normal) spreadsheet the rank must be reorganized (Gtest) on the ten powers: as is, the program will not compute.

through the (Oct2018)TNED/IAU test **Sun's photometric
effect** (all specifications in ResTAB):

We input a
(test 6.67) G-value, calculate the Sun mass through Kepler's Third *m*S =
(2π/*t*)^{2}R^{3}/G, R=1AU=**1.4959787 T11** M,
knowing the anomalistic period **365.259425**d and the mean ellipsis length
(2AU); we use the instrumental epoch standard:

We take the TNED math physics readout of a corresponding Sun mass in a
separate calculus cell until Kepler's show up:

We read the
result in the Photometric Effect result. Until IT if at all shows the IAU
Sun measured value **3.8275 T26** W.

Iterations continues until if at all The IAU match
arrives.

TNED RESULT
(Oct2018):

*General cosmological TNED physics test on the entire
K-cell mathematical physics: *

*Solar system age*: **20.805Gy**;
year time: **365.256363004**d; present *rVIZ*: visual radius of universe: **1025.0491345**
Mpc;

K-cell mass: **4.161433381298 T53** KG

With G = **6.67000002 t11**
JM/(KG)² the IAU value **3.827500000** arrives in precise on the Kepler's
Nov2021mSUN = **1.989661830 T30** KG.

FOR THE RECORD OF CALCULATING THE SUN'S MASS THROUGH KEPLER'S
THIRD

on the Earth-Moon mass system propagation in the
anomalistic ellipse through perihelium twice

IT IS SUFFICIENT
WITH ONLY precisely measured ONE REVOLUTION PERIOD:

Sun loses mass continuously (by very small proportions)
and the elliptic orbit grows proportionally: *m*S = (2π/*t*)^{2}R^{3}/G;

The balancing centrifugal force from the Earth-Moon
system becomes less contracted towards the Sun as its gravitational mass power
decreases due to its production of light and heat.

The effect is
that the mean distance factor R increases with a corresponding increasing
orbital period (*t*).

So. It need not
be more than one single occasion of a (precise) measure to settle the time
factor (and the elliptic major axis length, given the appropriate instrumentation).
*Over hundreds of years a still more precise value will appear or/and
reveal differences.*

mJbalance: SunMASS

COMPARE corresponding attempts IN MEASURING EARTHS MASS

No precise Earth
orbital mass calculation exists

ASSUMED PERFECT BALANCE BETWEEN HYDROGEN AND HELIUM MASS
ESCAPE AND COSMIC DUST INFLOW

Even WITH a
precise G value (for further test) AND assuming Earth mass is a constant, the
Earth mass value will NOT allow itself to be captured by any kind or sort of
mathematical calculus. Why? The influence from the Sun itself in the Moon orbit
around the Earth and the Moon's (and Sun's) influence on artificially
satellites around the Earth make (significant) contributions as well as the
Earth FORM itself, including its inner (crust) and tidal changes. These ruin a
deeper »exact» instrumental measure.

Some of these aspects are touched in the below cited
references (web sample Nov2021):

Mass
redistributions inside, on, and above the Earth's surface are responsible for
time variable gravity field forces, which directly influence a satellite's
orbit. In case these variations have a frequency above the Nyquist frequency,
which is defined by the repeat period of a satellite orbit, one has to take
into account these mass variations during orbit determination in order to avoid
aliasing due to undersampling.,

It is obvious
that mass variations by tidal forces and in the coupled atmosphereocean system
occur by far with higher frequencies than the Nyquist frequency of a single
satellite mission.,

OXFORD ACADEMIC Geophysical Jornal International,
Volume 182, Issue 2, August 2010, Pages 79780

Published: 01 August 2010 ¦
https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/182/2/797/571275

;

**4.3
Anomalistic Month**

The anomalistic month is defined as the revolution of the
Moon around its elliptical orbit as measured from perigee to perigee. The
length of this period can vary by several days
from its mean value of 27.55455 days (27d 13h 18m 33s).,

The length of
the draconic month is strongly modulated by the position of the nodes with
respect to the major axis of the Moon's orbit. The histogram in Figure 4-11
shows how the draconic month changes from 2008 through 2017. The 173-day
alignment of the Sun with a node appears as the rapid oscillation in the month
length. The quasi-sinusoidal envelopes surrounding the minima and maxima form
two longer period oscillations. Over the 10-year period covered in this figure,
the minimum month duration varies from 27.089 to 27.011 days (3.0 to 4.8 hours shorter than the mean). The
maximum month duration ranges from 27.261 to 27.472 days (1.2 to 6.2 hours longer than the mean).,

NASA ECLIPSES AND THE MOON'S ORBIT (2021)

https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEhelp/moonorbit.html

:

THAT MEANS TO SAY:

Attempting to ANOMALISTICALLY MEASURE Earths mass
(through Keplers Third) by Moons anomalistic orbit around the Earth arrives
at a safe 100% crash any way we count.

The Satellite
part meets (practically) the same issue: additional (in and out) parameters
must be compensated for craving a minor computer central for keeping track of
the variations (none here cited, all implied).

So how the
exact of THE MASS OF THE EARTH?

ANSWER:

It takes form gradually through the history of
science (precision measurements on the surface ..).

See further from *EarthPoint* and EARTH
RADIUS. *The
results might surprise the reader*.

COSMIC PRODUCTION

**In order to balance out the Earth
atmospheric** Hydrogen (9.5
T7 KG/y) and Helium (0.16 T7 KG/y) mass escape, **an input of
only one single itty bitty tiny grain of sand** (1mM 2.3 t6 KG) per year over each 12 M² of the Earths surface will
suffice to keep the balance exact. One grain. Or over each one M² Earth
surface: 12 years per M². What we know: there is (by far) no physical
instrumental device with which to carry out, even theoretically, such a
verifying, or disclaiming scientific expedition.

»Grandpas
Diary». One per 12 years.

But, says
modern corridors, from where would such come?

Conditions in
interstellar space are generally not suitable for the formation of silicate
cores. This would take excessive time to accomplish, even if it might be
possible. The arguments are .. it would take considerably longer than the age
of the Universe for interstellar grains to form.,

Wikipedia 20Dec2021 on Cosmic Dust

The principle
of it is understood, very well. But the general cosmological idea of how
physics itself built the universe places definit intrusive markers in modern
corridors.

DARK MATTER IN TNED is most easily
explained from CAP by a general neutron nuclear SiO2 matrix: the main WASTE
from primary body building (SIU) see also GENERAL
NEUTRON NUCLEAR MATRICES from CAP:

Banned in modern quarters:

POSSIBLY PRIMARY SURFACE EJECTED IN ENORMOUS AMOUNTS

**CAP** ¦ Primary distribution of elements inside Earth ¦ DIAsquare ¦ BaseCHART ¦ CELESTIAL bodies building time from Dmax to Dnormal¦ Modern
academy: water from
the outer

TAT: Usand

A TREATISE ON THE MILKY WAY AND ITS NEAR NEIGHBOR
ANDROMEDA *and some small change, give or take*

A GRAIN OF SAND
IN UNIVERSE

*The Andromeda test:*

ANDROMEDAMILKY-WAY GALAXY MOTION?

**Doppler shift observations**
(WIKIPEDIA2021data)
states that The Andromeda Galaxy is approaching the Milky Way at about 110
kilometers per second on an estimated distance center-center of 765 Kpc (2.361
T22 M). Meaning: A worst case center-center meeting will come some *t=*(**6
800 100 418**.90765 y) **6.8 Gy** from now.

The NASA article (Article Stamp: 10.14.04? Is that 2010 or 2014 or 2004?)
sampled 9Dec2021 (*featuring a class lecture on Andromeda-MilkyWay*)

nasa.gov
/audience/forstudents/5-8/features/F_When_Gallaxies-Collide.html

STUDENT FEATURES MILKY WAY VS ANDROMEDA :

says The students fear this may be the end of life .. But, their teacher reassures her class that there is very little chance of stars directly impacting our Sun or Earth.

That feels comforting (*whispered Carl to Helen ..*).

TNED class has
another solution completely absent in modern corridors *seen to the
universe as a whole, but accepted in modern quarters close to heavy individual
masses*:

**Lights Gravitational Dependency** on
RELATED
ABSOLUTE METRICS

*c*_{0} ..... *c*_{1}
..... *c*_{2} ..... *c*_{3} ..... *c*_{4}
..... *c*_{5} ..

more enveloped mass, less
relative local speed of light, meaning *seen from a g-center*:

Gravitational RED shift (longer light-waves) increases with distance from g-center, meaning: BLUE shift (shorter light-waves) is read/measured instrumentally with light coming from g-center arriving to a station (US) outside it: same principal Instrumental Doppler observation as between moving objects (speed-camera).

In this Andromeda test we will (*try to*) expedite a
thorough analysis of that mathematics, and see where it leads *it leads to
a quite different possible interpretation: Andromeda lies close to a universal
g-center, while Milky Way is resting quite near to it (internal g-center
density/gravity distribution equilibrium), or eventually rotates around the
g-center (Andromeda ¦ *LateralTEST*)
on a very (very hard to determine) small amount: No collision ever*.

* *

*It came as a bonus ..* ITM ¦ ITEM ¦ **ITMresult** ¦ AndTER ¦ THE ANDROMEDA LATERAL TEST

THE GREAT ANDROMEDA TEST

** **

**The radial part
of the Andromeda test. See also ****AndromedaLATERAL****.**

EarthMass2021IAU.ods Tabell3¦A97

KINETICS *Lights
liberty clause** in related physics: light connects not to kinetics*:

RELATED ABSOLUTE
METRICS
lights (*divergences*) gravitational dependency (DGD) in TNED:

a location
with higher gravitational potential (*more enveloped mass *G*m/r *TNED
K-cell physics) affects lights divergence (speed) with

reduced electromagnetic frequency on elongated
electromagnetic wavelengths:

no matter
where in the electromagnetically active universe the speed of light (divergence)
is measured, *lights gravitational dependency* certifies and guarantees that one
and the same local constant *c*_{0} = 2.99792458 T8 M/S will be the result of such
electromagnetic measures (*properties of the atomic nucleus: gravitations
fundamental form*). Cannot be changed, altered, affected or modified. *However,
the (kinetic) dynamics efficiency also reflects*.

MODERN ESTABLISHED INTERPRETATION OF THE DOPPLER MEASURED
VALUE

TABLES with measured Doppler values suggest that the
Andromeda Galaxy relative our Milky Way Galaxy approaches with a velocity of
275 KM/S (BA1978s315.Tab15.3). With a present estimated cc-distance of
2.13 T22 M it means:

after *t=d/v*
= (2,13 T22 M)/(275 000 M/S) = 2.454386438 T9y ~ 2.45Gy their centers have
merged provided a head on impact.

The NASA article says The students fear this may be
the end of life .. But, their teacher reassures her class that there is very
little chance of stars directly impacting our Sun or Earth.

That must be
comforting.

*Basic data from Cambridge International Astronomy 1977/78* BA1978* we will later compare with more
recent figures*
(WikipediaDec2021)

PRESENT
Dec2021DATA FROM WIKIPEDIA (ITEM) PRESENTS
ALTERNATIVE VALUES FOR TEST.

**Present 2021
standard of confidence: 2.5Gy from now, Milky Way has collapsed with Andromeda
to a »mixed whatever remains» cargo subject. The sky will be (very) different.**

** The present scientific interpretation is
based on a universal idea that the velocity of light has the same value
everywhere independent of location: no ****general universal gravitational Doppler effect**** is accounted on. All Doppler effect results light wavelength measuring
and comparing point out MOVING OBJECTS.**

** So: The only
modern academic scientific possible interpretive way between Milky and Andro is
a (head on) impact:**

→** 2.3 T22 M **←

TNED COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE DOPPLER MEASURED
VALUE

TNED physics and cosmology (K-cell Heat Physics) has an
additional option besides the conventional moving part:

Gravitational
Doppler effect: Our Universe has a distinct g-center with c=c0, decreasing
further out with Doppler Red.

That is the modern academic corresponding effect of
dark energy (»additional expansion of the universe») because a
gravitational universal Doppler effect is banned in modern corridors. If A
UNIVERSAL gravitational Doppler effect is adopted, the modern academy
cosmological theory crashes guaranteed 100% completely.

Basic TNED view (what the distance tables show) K-cell
center:

** **

**Milky Way Birth
and present Age. TNED physics and cosmology calculates the only possible
present explainable existence of a Milky Way ending up in the vicinity of the
K-center as in an equal distance to the observed (adopted) average galaxy
separation of about 3 Mpc (BA1978s324). Taking the K-cells DIER through that
distance gives a time window of close to 10 My. As the K-cell heat physics
solution gives a present value of 20.82Gy (20.815) for the age of our universe,
the actual ideal age of Milky Way and all its stars and systems arrives at a
20.805Gy. Then the ideal position of Milky Way is »stay put» where it was
developed from the K-cell inner wall expansion and its divergence ignition at
9.78 My after The Big Bang.**

** More likely,
some additional velocity was given to the Milky Way Mother J-body. We will
return to that aspect, soon.**

** **

** **

IF NAMELY the observed and reported Doppler effect values
do have some meaning here our Milky Way and its neighbor Andromeda in example
the »REST OF THE STORY» will be explained by TNED physics and its K-cell
properties (or not at all):

1 (**275
KM/S**)/(c0=2.99 792 458 T8 M/S) = **0.999082698** *the actual
corresponding Andromeda Doppler blue shift value*.

**Testing the
simple equation 1 a + b = k = GRAVITATIONAL Doppler Blue From Andromeda any
type of separation between Milky and Ando arriving at the k will do as for
example (the locally determined gravitational Doppler values for a and b):**

** **

EarthMass2021IAU.ods Tabell3¦A112

** **

** **

**Each of these
(randomly) exemplified ab values corresponds (TNED says) to a significant
STATIC NO MOTION gravitational position outside the a=b=1 K-center. Additional
motion action adds additional Doppler values. The actual gravitational Doppler
ratio c/c0 is determined**

** **

** **

** c/c0 = (1/2)(1 + √ 1
4r²πGD/3c0²)**

** **

**with ρ
(Greek, rho) replaced by D for a given local density parameter. With r=0 the
c/c0 = 1. The equation (See a detailed deduction in ****Lights Gravitational Dependency****) extends to c/c0=½ which applies in calculating all the near K-cell
center actions (changing the ± signs takes care of the remaining, but it has no
connection to this following description).**

THE THING IS, TNED says in its cosmological physics, that
ONLY SPECIFIC such ab G Doppler values are relevant IF we are dealing with
Milky and Andro NEAR THAT K-cell center which was implied in the basic
determination of the age of the system. To be noted.

Namely only those different a and b defining the actual
distance Milky to Andro precisely.

That can only
present one single solution says TNED for TNED IF Milky and Andro are to be
at at physical REST relative each other: no catastrophic novel:

The5th: DIER

BOTH Milky and Ando were developed from the K-cell inner
divergences ignition expanding rim (DIER)

**in four
non-destructive possible ways**:

STATISTICALLY a fifth candidate is directly seen as a
RARE minority in possible end action (~ 3Mpc galaxy distances *with the
galaxies themselves more or less resembling grains of sand over the huge
distances*).

The calculated
primary received velocity fits reasonably arriving at the K-cell centre region
on our present time scale:

*v* = 141 KM/S: 1 *v/c*0 = 0.999529695 IF
applicable.

But we must
also take into account the (huge) amount of DARK MATTER TNED cosmologys explained (huge) SAND mass given out over the entire
divergence ignition resulting exothermal (GRB) bodies, ejecting enormous amount
of waste material:

**Schematically
illustrated sequential divergence ignition ****TNED
treats GRB:s****.
They are birth not death of galaxies and stars.**

**TNED calculations
give the ratio ****1/355**** between visible mass and actual mass of the entire K-cell mass 4.16 T53
KG (****ResTAB****, the Oct2018IAU test). As the main ejected part surface matter is smeller
or bigger neutron spheres (water drop analogy), their finest possible least
dense products (easily) can form silicon-oxygen with other elements products.
See the general neutron nuclear matrix in ****KOLMATRISEN**** on the simple principle of ****CAP**** (concentric atomic production).**

** As small as the come, they (easily) fill the huge empty
space with mM grains separated by cubic kilometers in average distance.**

**:**

** The K-cell density changes from ****Dmax**** 1.82 T17 KG/M² to 6 t29 KG/M² at
the end (****KcellAGE**** ¦ ****336Gy****). That is 46 powers of ten.**

** **

** **

*A universal TNED possible way to explain huge masses of
type 1mM grains of sand with huge free space in between*

THE RING AND SAND GRAIN ANALOGY IN THE EXPANDING INNER
K-CELL'S INCREASING DENSITY

**The K-cell expansion resembles the illustrated situation
as follows (says ****TNED****):**

**(***Neutron Plasma distribution inside the expanding K-cell***)**

** **

**We can view the amount of neutrons collected in
spherical masses after the **

** As the
expansion pace is largest at the farthest outer **→**, and thereby the radial perpendicular
**↨** separating force effect between nearby neutron balls maximized,
the detached neutron mass balls become the smallest possible farthest out.**

** Further in,
with decreasing expansion pace and thereby lower separation force effect,
successively larger neutron balls reside.**

** Thereby, by
physical principle as suggested, large balls further in with the smallest
farthest out. (See also TNED in ***Expansion Mathematics***)**

SANDorigin: UNIVERSEsand

** **

**Detached primary neutron J-body masses on the K-cell
inner side, **

**as explained by TNED physics (***General Wave Equation***). ****PREFIXxSIN****.**

** **

**As the ***zero
divergence zone*** (****DIER****) sweeps the detached bodies, they
behave as K-cell miniatures in their detonating moment. Then the whole
expanding system can fragment down on elementary material cells type galaxies
with their inner subsystems of stars and planets and huge amounts of
debris; Possibly small type Earth mineral mM grains of crust, see basic ***neutron
nuclear matrices*** from ****CAP****, ***concentric atomic production***. Because spread out by many cubic kilometer space per
each single mM sized grain: practically impossible to detect and completely
without any kind of explaining theory whatsoever in modern quarters see quote
below.**

** **

.. Larger dust particles with sizes up to football
format would without difficulty hold the cluster collected and still be
impossible to discover; problem is only we have no knowledge of a simple
process whereby such objects can form., BA1978s360.

The principle
is noted but modern theory crashes: on origin.

** **

DENSITYin: SANDorigin

THE POINT 1 IS THIS ONE *a possible density increase
towards center*:

** DIVERGENCE (****DEEP****) electromagnetic active force
is more active and potent when directed towards the inner lower gravitational
potential max c0 centre of the expanding K-cell than the outer (the yet
electromagnetically dormant neutron ball masses):**

** See more detailed with proof in ****KCHIP****.**

** Comparably
by principle more mass is ignited to the in than the out as the K-cell
advances by lighting up its universe:**

** Or more
directly said: The K-cell inner receives ***or can so be understood to receive*** a proportionally larger amount of
mass than would be the case with an ideal homogeneous density distribution all
over the K-cell.**

** **

**More expanding
power directed towards the c>0 active K-cell inner than is directed to the
outer (more electromagnetically dormant) K-cell expanding RIM outer edge
certifies a principal higher degree of debris ejected to the in than to the
out: The K-cell shows principal properties favoring a higher density
distribution towards its inner parts, by time thereby promoting an end
station for the K-cell expansion history.**

** But where do we
find a reasonable physical instrumentally measured observed proof? **

** See more
detailed in ****The ANDROMEDA Test****.**

** **

** **

RESULT BY PRINCIPLE:** K-cell inner partially higher
density regions by physical principle tend to ***or can so be
understood to*** attract individual masses towards the higher densitys
most prominent gravitational region: ****The Mass
Ring Analogy****:**

** **

** **

** **

THE POINT 2 IS *the gravitational ring analogy*:

** With a principle
inner assembly of a more dense (spherical) shell with a less dense region near
K-center as a ring of balls a separate ball B inside the ring taken all
the actual spherical shells projected gravitational potentials on to it
resembles the situation of a steel ball lying on a shallow slope leaning
towards the ring, and with a peak in the K-cell center:**

** The B-ball
falls down to its most near gravitationally attracting part from the resulting
gravitationally summed potentials: **

** to the nearest ring side:**

** **

** **

** IF that
affected mass had a beginning with a specific velocity directed towards the
K-center, there is a (great) possibility that it will be detracted, and
eventually end up in a stay put condition on the edge of inner K-cell
gravitationally balancing forces.**

** The farthest
outer parts of the K-cell can continue with the expansion without any hazard to
the already established inner status.**

** **

THE POINT 3 IS:

**IF there possibly also would be a remaining center
(formed galaxy), the previous **

** **

** **

**See more details from ****The ANDROMEDA Test****.**

THE INNER

** With an average galactic distance of some 3 Mpc = 9.3
T22 M (****BA1978****s324sp2n), the (****DIER****) r0c sweep reserves an ideal light time window of t
= 3Mpc/c0 = 9.8 My. From that point the (MW) Milky Way galaxy is a
principal candidate for birth in the universal history of TNED K-cell physics.
If also ejected precisely on an opposed expansion velocity, **

** **

** **

**the MW stays put apart from possible future attractive
motions by nearby masses.**

** IF the MW body final station history is supposed to
have a slight greater net push velocity towards the (average 3Mpc distant)
K-center, the time to reach that point taken on the whole of the present (TNED
calculated 20.82Gy) universes age would be:**

*v ***= 3Mpc/20.82Gy ~ 141 KM/S.**

** IF again the MW (then) would CONNECT to an already
positioned (K-center, »The Andro»), the initial vMW could could
possible become a rotational v as MW (slowly) adopts and connects to
the (possibly heavier K-center) partner. That would be our present situation
for a (thorough) general test:**

** Andromeda in K-center, and MW slightly outside with a
corresponding (****ITMresults****) Gravitational Doppler Blue of the
reported measured magnitude: modern corridors: »they will collide in the
future» Type »**popular
Nobel prize festivities**».**

** A (trajectory
skewed) inside pushed J-mass body M may be attracted towards an inner edge
(ring) side. But in meeting (a more massive) central J-body mass A, its
attraction (and the opposite wall) will force the trajectory of M to approach A
with a possible situation that M ends up as a (very slow circulating)
satellite to A (where A might experience some minor dislocation from its
original K-center as well).**

The only way to
settle what is what, will be to measure light (Doppler effects) from all
positions around, ahead and back; setting up a »Doppler Trap».

AndromedaLATERAL: DENSITYin

There is (was: around 2012) an interesting (more detailed) FORUM
DISCUSSION on the subject in

physics.stackexchange.com/questions ..

**physics**

ANDROMEDA/MILKY WAY COLLISION: HOW, AND HOW ACCURATELY, CAN A GALAXYS

LATERAL VELOCITY BE MEASURED?

Several serious contributors hint at the central difficulty, along with
aiming at possible measuring techniques (and reporting some results ..). Se
also Wikipedia quote on in ITM.

As for our ROTATIONAL possibility, the LATERAL or transversal (normal)
component has the following illustrative possible status:

**
****no doubt a
measure exists. But: what is it?**

** **

**Gravitational Doppler Blue**** TNED cosmology not represented in modern
quarters explains the situation: no collision. In modern academy
gravitational Doppler effects only counts for isolated mass bodies never for
the whole of the universe (see ****Fig.1****). So, the academy has only one exit to
chose on in this show: collision. The intelligence is fine. Problem is: its
related content ..**

TNED says (most probably): **it is a
rotation** (further
proving the K.cell center close to or within Andromeda).

** IF the measure reflects a
rotation, it will be, as far as here is understood, impossible within
reasonable time (hundreds of years) to settle whether the measure reflects a
strict transversal motion, a strict rotational one, or perhaps a combination of
both.**

We must have very detailed
measuring information if any further settlement is possible in this text. What
we know: the level of information from modern corridors does not include such
type of specifications (only reserved for the actual researching group). Maybe
they know how to close the case.

** **

** **

**See more details from ****The ANDROMEDA Test****.**

** **

BACK TO THE SAND GRAIN QUEST

** **

*See partly English translated in **SandOrigin**.*

THE PROBLEM (DARK
MATTER) is
known in modern academy as the missing mass; More mass is needed to explain
the mutual behavior of the galaxies than the visual mass can explain. TNED
calculations include a solution »by automation» (VISIBLE
AND TOTAL MASS).

The cited text tells that SAND would also be a solution
to the problem in modern corridors (see also Wikipedia quote in *CosmicDust*) if only somebody knew how it was made. Compare TNED on
the general neutron nuclear matrix in KOLMATRISEN on the simple principle of CAP (concentric atomic production)
»Its TNED» (again).

THE FUNCTION OF THE MAJOR (SAND) MASS TAKES CONTOUR:

As the divergence direction is directed from the
divergences rim into, towards, the K-cells inner, the ejected waste mass
(sand) preferentially is *or can so be understood to be* pushed towards
the inner K-cell parts, thereby building a higher central density.

Returning (DENSITYin) to the four constructive
candidates,

the additionally huge majority (sand) mass between the
galaxies themselves offer a direct *possible* explanation (*to the TNED
suggested constellation Milky Way versus Andromeda*):

ANDROMEDA ¦ **a(c/c0)** **b(c/c0)** ¦ MILKY WAY measures **k(c/c0)**
*to Andromeda*

** The simple
testing equation**: (ITEM):

**1**(Kcenter) **a + b = k** = GRAVITATIONAL Doppler Blue From Andromeda *to
Milky Way (center)*

LIGHTS GRAVITATIONAL DEPENDENCY Cheops
hyperbolic solutions from original CHEOPS
RECTANGLE math bd=h²

The static part. See also MAC in Fig.1 Divergence
constanrt c0 = 2.99792458 T8 M/S is conserved independent of gravitation the
neutron: h=mcr

*type ***1 = **gBLUE**k(c/c0=0.91)
+ **gBLUE**a(c/c0=0.99) **gBLUE**b(c/c0=0.9)**

**1**(Kcenter) **a = k** ** b ¦ 1**(Kcenter) + **b = k** **+ a ¦ 1**(Kcenter)
**k = a** ** b**

must have **a** and **b** as defined by a local
density of SUCH a magnitude as to resolve the actual (**k**) Doppler blue
shift value ON

ANDROMEDA *d *= **2.13 T22** M MILKY-WAY

SOURCE: BA1978 Cambridge International Astronomy
1977/78 Kpc = 1000pc 1pc = 3.08568 T16
M

Andromeda
galaxy must lie slightly closer to K-cell center reading »less gravitational
red»;

* If the reader
has other suggestions, please share.*

Milky Way
galaxy must lie slightly farther away from K-cell center reading »more
gravitational red»;

With the given
distance between Milky and Andro *d* = **2.13 T22** M (690 Kpc) their
halfway must be less to Andro, more to Milky.

We have to
iterate a testing solution value in order to arrive at »the actual Doppler
observed value».

There are some
(leading dynamical, physical) arguments to how, what and why. *Apart from
those already mentioned, we will touch on that in the following*.

WE WILL HAVE TO INCLUDE A DENSITY PARAMETER IN OUR
ITERATIVE EXPEDITION

** **

**The more central mass m2 enveloped
in r from g-center, the deeper ****Gravitational
Doppler Red effect****. So a density ρ=D test is
imperative here.**

WHICH WILL REVEAL *and introduce imperative*
ONSETS TO A CRITICAL STUDY ON RESULTS AND THE ACTUALLY KNOWN OBSERVATIONS

WHAT TYPE DENSITY
IS DEMANDED?

FOR A TNED GRAVITATIONAL DOPPLER VALUE SOLUTION

*with the general K-cell mean total density at present
20.82 Gy: ***1.658
t26** KG/M³

ITM: UNIsand

IN MODERN
CORRIDORS A

**GENERAL
UNIVERSAL GRAVITATIONAL DOPPLER**** SHIFT **

HAS NO SAY.
Here we test it very.

Wikipedia
@INTERNET on Andromeda galaxy (15Dec2021)

Collision with
the Milky Way

The Andromeda Galaxy is approaching the Milky Way at about **110 kilometers per second** ..

It has been
measured approaching relative to the Sun at around 300 km/s .. as the Sun
orbits around the center of the galaxy at a speed approximately 225 km/s ..

.. and
therefore it is expected to collide directly
with the Milky Way in about 4 billion years..

v/c0** Redshift: 0.0003669205 = 1.10 T5 / 2.99792458 T8**; Andromeda to Milky Way: 110 ±1 KM/S;

c/c0 Blueshift:
1 Red = 0.9996330795

**Distance: 765 Kpc**;

Mass Milky Way
(Wikipedia, Dec2021): ................ (0.8-**1.5**) T12
· 1.98847 T30 KG = **2.982705 T42** KG

Mass Andromeeda
(Wikipedia, Dec2021): ........... (**1.5 **± 0.5) T12 ·
1.98847 T30 KG = **2.982705 T42** KG

Andromeda/Milky
Way:

The mass of either galaxy is difficult to estimate with
any accuracy, but it was long thought that the Andromeda Galaxy is more
massive than the Milky way by a margin of some 25% to 50%.

This has been
called into question by a 2018 study ...

Wikipedia
@INTERNET on AndromedaMilky Way collision (15Dec2021)

However, **the lateral
speed** (measured as proper motion) is very
difficult to measure with a precision to draw
reasonable conclusions ..

.. researchers
reported on using the Hubble Space Telescope to measure the positions of stars in the Andromeda in 2002 and 2010, relative to hundreds of background distant galaxies.

By averaging
over thousands of stars they were able to obtain the average proper motion much
better than one pixel accuracy.

*Cambridge
International Astronomy 1977/1978* BA1978s361

English: ..
the extra galactic astronomy is certainly tormented badly by problems in
concern of the interpretation of redshifts and the work on measuring wide
objects.

COMPILED DATA FROM BONNIERS
ASTRONOMI [BA1978] Swedish
version of Cambridge International Astronomy 1977

Compare [shortform]: Wikipedia2021DATA.

Based on
exactly the same light signal Doppler observations with possibly dramatically
different interpretations.

1 **a +
b = k** ¦
1 **k = a b** ¦ **b = a** [
1 + **k** ]:

ITERATION METHOD
The Great Andromeda Test

.. No .. you dont say ..

**k** = the
corresponding measured/observed Doppler **c/c0=k**:

We TEST an
Andromeda closest to K-center position Ra < **2.13 T22** M/2 to
create

*a testable fictitious*** regional space density mass**

*m* = (R*a*/G)*c*_{0}^{2}(1 [2**c/c0**] 1)^{2}/**4**
from the TNED derived STATIC Lights gravitational dependency *c/c*_{0}

**with the gravitational potential** *w*^{2}=G*m*/R*a*
in

** **

** **

THERE we iterate on an **(a=c/c0(** factor (0.99...
from an onset for R*a*)

**giving a local density**

D = *m*/V
= 3*m*/(4πR*a*^{3}) with a resulting

**(b=c/c0) = a** [ 1+ **k** ]

AND WE CONTINUE ON THAT ROUTE

**until**
the difference **(c/c0=a) (b=c/c0) = 0 ***with a full spread sheet
fifteen decimals*** meaning**

****

**(a=c/c0) (1 k) (b=c/c0) = 0**

****

** a b 1 + k
= 0 **; ** **

** a b = 1 k **(*the
actual doppler figure normally given, type 1-0.999082699 = 0.000917301 =
DopplerBlue*).

The answer
will be in **a** and **b** from the tested R*a* and resulting

R*b* = **2.13
T22M R a**

**when** if at all **a b 1 + k = 0**.

*We dont care about the masses of the objects at the
testing point of investigation, only the surrounding masses mass densities
wherein the objects reside (then afterwards we can consult reasonable actual
masses in general the local mass
density should lie close to the actually iterated mean mass values as limited
to their corresponding galactic disc diameters, or possibly close to their
spherical average).*

FIRST FOR FURTHER DIRECT COMPARISON AND REFERENCE:

*We use the 1977/78 Cambridge International Astronomy
values for a first reference along with TNED results:*

*the general K-cell mean total density at present 20.82
Gy: ***1.658 t26** KG/M³

**FM1975**** ¦ ****BA1978**** (***Cambridge International Astronomy***). Basic reference data on our Milky Way galaxy. We also use a 1mM³ grain
of sand for further practical comparing, along with others the sand issue
will be returned to in specific.**

Milky Way interstellar density is (BA1978s259 *uses
unspecified atom per volume unit, we apply atom = 1 hydrogen atom 1,67 T27 KG*)
around **1.5 t21** KG/M³. The Milky Way itself (the actual main disc) is
specified (BA1978) 1.4 T11 Solar masses (mS ~ 1.989 T30 KG), = **2.8 T41**
KG, diameter ~ 30 Kpc, a sphere with
volume 4.15 T62 M³, with a mean (not fair) density **6.7 t22** KG/M³;
BA1978s324 specifies a rough interstellar medium in Milky Way density of **2
t21** KG/M² comparing a general all matter spread out over »the entire
universe» by the figure **2 t28** KG/M³. (*Wikipedia Dec2021 has poor [no
direct simple MKSA international system] values to show on the Milky Way
article*).

**The density issue** (KCHIP) is imperative in TNED cosmology for clarifying how and
why the K-cell expansion ceases and returns on a contractive phase: the K-cell
center inevitably must collect a higher degree of mass during the expansion
period, causing the expanding velocity to halt (after 336Gy says TNED). The only rational explanation for such
physics (TNED says) is huge amounts of sand grains (general Earth like crust matter: Si, Mg, Al, Fe and others with some
organic parts included, see *neutron
nuclear matrices*) from the primary (concentric atomic production CAP) ejections. COMPARE:

**CAP** ¦ Primary distribution of elements inside Earth ¦ DIAsquare ¦ BaseCHART ¦ CELESTIAL bodies building time from Dmax to
Dnormal¦ Modern academy: water
from the outer

*(Except the **quote
from BA1978**). Modern corridors mentions not even the sand grain possibility type
one single grain 1mM³ per many cubic kilometer empty space easily overriding
the visual mass. See in explicit special treatise in **Dark matter
light emitting capacity*.

ITMresults: ITM

THE ITERATING RESULTS

WITH a lowest possible central K-cell density (6.56 t22
KG/M³ near Milky Ways spherical mean) the result points out to our
somewhat astonishing surprise: the easy proof of it that The Andromeda Galaxy
strongly could be interpreted as THE K-cell center *or very close to such a
center*.

The Andromeda galaxy is (BA1978s315Tabell15.3) estimated about
twice the Milky Way galaxy mass with a surrounding additional set of smaller
Andromeda companion galaxies and clusters way far more bright and with a more
prominent central massif of followers than our Milky Way (*Wikipedia, Local
Group has galactic charts with illustrations*).

*As the innermost central point of the K-cell center never
is dark, always electromagnetically active independent of K-cell expansions and
contractions *

* gravitational potential = zero:*

The *Andromeda Galaxy as a consequence *
should be a PERMANENTLY ASSOCIATED REGION with the innermost K-cell center:

The innermost K-cell region is always
electromagnetically active (*r*0*c* static connection; *G-factors*):

IF the Andromeda test result holds, the Andromeda
galaxy region could obviously be interpreted as REMNANTS *after the initial
detonation* from that hot innermost »eternal cosmic center» if no
disclaiming argument arrive:

If that is so: When we look at the Andromeda form, part
and light, we look at something really, really old :

eternal
bright. That is something new if at all.

**The results strongly indicate that the TNED deduced
K-cell center g-center of the universe lies (very) close to (or is the)
Andromeda galaxy.**

THE TNED RELATED GRAVITATIONAL DOPPLER
ANDROMEDA TEST 10Dec2021 *excluded in modern academic corridors for the
universe in general, but adopted (with limits, see **Fig.1**) in modern corridors for single
local massive bodies meaning: this type test is forbidden in modern quarters:*

**Kpc = 1000pc**, see DIER.

The different Andromeda
velocity-distance values from the Cambridge1977-Wikipedia2021 sources
275KM/S¦2.13T22M-110KM/S¦2.36T22M cancel on the same net iterative result on
lowest density as compiled in the figure below and the following parametric
details from the 10Dec2021 Andromeda test:

The (orange) high
density results with low local divergence (type 0.55) are excluded (here) as
relevant candidated due to their low suggested principle electrodynamics. It is
assumed that our position in the TNED K-cell universe lies close to an ideal
c/c0=1. Which favours only those test results exposing c/c0 values type
0.9999.. .

EarthMass2021IAU.ods Tabell3¦K100

** EXCON 4
static conditions in the neighborhood?**

** Yes. That is
what it seems to work on.**

PROGRAM LIMIT: this test result is yet
unfinished: The fifteen iterative testing decimals refuse further resolution
with the left unsolved precision. *We need computer programming features with
higher numerical capacity than the available in OpenOffice, EXCEL, etc. IF, as
suggested 0.99999999... Andromeda galaxy g-center IS the K-cell center.*

Wikipedia figures, see quote in ITM.

EarthMass2021IAU.ods Tabell3¦X98

**No14¦15: The
M¦SPH[a+b]/2 value with χ2 replaced by χ1.8195 gives a mass ratio of (exactly)
355. It exemplifies the possible (tight) density definition leading to »exact
results».**

IN SPECIFIC
»EXCON ¦ 1» we find that *applying the expanding-contracting gravitational
Doppler math *ON the here assumedByTest K-cell central Milky Way and
Andromeda galactic groups, leads us to a quite different end station density
and MASS RATIO result while the 3.241 Kpc end result is not affected:

the mass ratio
M¦SPH[a+b]/2 χ LocalGalacticGroup then becomes:

** **

** EXCON 1?**

** Na .. . I would
not count on that one . On the other hand: Precise data on the level of galaxies
is no easy Sunday puzzle. Very difficult expedition.**

The basic TNED deductions on the K-cell Heat physics
accounts for a general K-cell/Universe mass ratio *m*VIZ/*m*K = 1/355 derived from the constant LQ²:
consuming mass to heat and light means consuming (Q) electric charge meaning
that (L) INDUCTANCE increases. See specific deduction i *mVIZ* ¦ mK/mVIZ ¦ Tfactor.

267/355=75%; 1069/355= 301%.

THE ARGUMENT for a STATIC condition in the K-cell
center region (Milky Way and Andromeda) assuming a defined K-cell center at
present TNED deduced K-cell age 20.82Gy, the actual Milky Way and Andromeda
reported data is (KCHIPstart¦KCHIP) that the K-cell central region by
20.82Gy already has reached a state of density equilibrium where no further
density distribution changes occur. That situation clearly applies to a STATIC
gravitational Doppler situation.

The TNED
central majority (355mVIZ) of dark matter mass uses the simple explaining
type (compare sand origin quote in modern
quarters from BA1978):

Sand grains can occupy the great spaces of void
in our universe with hundreds of kilometers cubic average mean distance
spaces *between and outside the more prominent local mass objects (gas,
stars, star clusters, galaxies).*

Its general fill (COSMIC
SAND ORIGIN IN TNED COSMOLOGY) can only have one source: The main ejected WASTE when
stars and planets are born out of expanding primary J-bodies.

With one 1mM³
sand grain per hundreds of kilometer cubic sides, no astronomical instrument
will EVER exist to detect such occurrences what we know.

The sand argument WOULD also be plausible in modern
corridors IF A THEORY FOR THE MAKING WOULD EXIST. It doesnt, as the quote
certifies.

That standpoint certifies the lower mass ratio result (*which
in fact would be the TNED deduced 355 »on more precise Andromeda data».*
But we dont know that here).

The Wikipedia quote
(ITM) The mass of either
galaxy is difficult to estimate with any accuracy also certifies the
general difficulty in specifying accurate values of mass (and distance) on the
galactic level. With some minor adjustments we would (easily) arrive at the
TNED decided figures also equally difficult to prove by any exact definition.

** **The Cambridge 1978........... **source gives
the K-center Andromeda position at 1/212 relative the Andromeda-Milky Way distance
2.13 T22 M.**

** **The Wikipedia 2021 .......... **source gives
the K-center Andromeda position at 1/235 relative the Andromeda-Milky Way
distance 2.36 T22 M.**

** Results with
the type Highest Density are excluded here because of the low local divergence
of type 0.5 (meaning dynamics halved: see ****TAT****, absolute
metrics).**

** See also
POSSIBLE Andromeda-Milky Way CONSTELLATION CONSTRUCT in ****DENSITYin****.**

It is less (physically by dynamics) likely that the
highly higher density value (t19 KG/M³) is the one representative for the
real natural answer:

A
gravitational Doppler value near ½*c*_{0} ruins the full physical
dynamical performance in matter as such;

Also note that
the ATOMIC TIME factor see *The
Absolute Metrics* follows the gravitational potential (light-frequency gravitational
dependency) with the (peculiar still no relativistic mingling) consequence
that

WHEREVER WE
are in the K-cell universe any physical (electromagnetic) measure on local *c*
gives the top value *c*_{0}. But regions with lower *c*
higher g-potential takes longer time to develop with standards compared to
regions with less g-potential. That is: the closer to the K-cell center, the
more optional is physical dynamics says TNED (Light physics gravitational
dependency).

IT HAS NOTHING
TO DO WITH TIME ITSELF ONLY ELECTRODYNAMICS EFFICIENCY PREFERENCES

*Planck Equivalents* not relativity theory: it forbids
the TNED deduced K-cell physics. Compare the different theories and their
limits in Fig.1.

ANDROMEDA RADIAL TEST RESULT (*See also **AndromedaLATERAL*):

ONLY BY THAT
ARGUMENT: ANDROMEDA GALAXY HAS ESTABLISHED A *most highly possible* K-CELL
CENTER in TNED cosmology (10Dec2021)

* a test defined
local as present (20.82Gy) density practically the same as (**MWR**) our Milky Way mean SPHERICAL one*: (**2-)6 t22** KG/M³

**while a TNED general calculated K-cell mean density**
@present20.82Gy (TNED K-cell math) **of 1.658 t26** KG/M³.

EarthMass2021IAU.ods Tabell3¦A50

**Note that m¦KG
inside Kc mass value in this general calculus card is based on an average
mean density D = 1.658 t26 KG/M³ from the actual K-cell sphere at present 20.82
Gy with no possible aspects taken on the more prominent inner K-cell density
distribution as in the Andromeda test****[]****. **

** See density
explained result in ****AndTER****.**

** We dont know
by mathematics how (yet if at all) the density distribution changes towards
the outer rim from center: We would have to alter the simple basic equations
for such results and test them to actual observations.**

** **

: **0** for basic math; **1** for
additional value tests on the v-parameter. Inner marked rectangle calculates
the divergence detail from center to d¦M=maxR.

: **1** fot time units in Gy = 1 T9 y; **0**
in seconds: tMIN = tOFFSET = **0.000198226014336** S on Dmax = 1.82 T17
KG/M³.

ARE THEY AT REST?

The TNED
cosmological gravitational Doppler RADIAL Andromeda test definitely and
strongly suggest that Milky Way and Andromeda have no mutual radial = shortest
distance changing motion.

The AndromedaLATERAL overview leaves the question open for the
actuallly involved reseachers:

The Question is raised wheather the reported results
should be interpreted as a direct radially right angle motion, or as a
(corresponding) result of a small rotation of Milky Way around the Andromeda
galaxy as the TNED test suggests a practical K-cell centre.

So it seems, TNED says with a small Milky Way
rotation around the Andromeda galaxy cluster. But the interpretation of the
(hard to get at) lateral aspect may change this resolution.

Both Andromeda and Milky Way have satellite galaxies
rotating around them, as it seems. But relative each other if this
Gravitational Doppler test is the only physical activity in the area they
have no other Doppler components:

Explained in DENSITYin.

Yes. They are at rest, TNED Gravitational Doppler
effect says with Andromeda galaxy (very) close to the TNED deduced K-cell
center. No collision will occur ever.

*m*_{2}
is the central actually (*visual + any eventual dark or hidden*) star
gravitating mass:

At great
distances from the actual thermonuclear reaction center (StarANVIL in TNED ¦ TNED/MAC) the *pe* factor is
negligible. That leaves us with the remaining *p*-factor which after
some (*deduction*) reckoning arrives at the simple balancing equivalent * r = * R√ **m**/4π*m* :

**The TNED deduced ****Thermonuclear
radiation pressure**** **not the electro-kinetic modern counterpart[]** has no modern academic
representation:**

**R** cubic side of sand grain; *r*
distance from (galaxy center) thermonuclear
reaction center ; **m** the physical
(not only the visual) actually gravitating mass of the (galaxy center) thermonuclear
reaction center ; *m* grain mass;

R = (*m*/D)^{1/3}; sand (Quartz, SiO3 has
D = 2320 KG/M³): R*cube* = (*m*/2320)^{1/3}

Sand grains
lighter than *m* are guaranteed to keep out of the galactic sphere (*r*)
on credit of the central/total galactic nuclear radiation pressure.

A cubic R=1mM³ grain of sand has mass *m* = 2.323
t6 KG.

Taking the
ideal worst case TNED calculated general K-cell mass ratio *m*VIZ/**m**K
= 1/355, given a round Milky Way mass (Cam1977) 2 T41 KG, the equilibrium is
satisfied where (*the Milky Way galaxy disc diameter is 30 Kpc*)

R*cube* = (*m*/[DQuartz=2320KG/M³])^{1/3}

*r = * (0.001 M)√ **(355Χ2 T41 KG)**/4π(2.323 t6 KG)

* = *√ [DQuartz=2320KG/M³]^{2/3}[*m*=2.323
t6 KG]^{1/3}**(355Χ2 T41 KG)**/4π(2.323 t6 KG)

= **1.56**
022313170679 T21 M = **50.563** 3883584669 Kpc

Number of such *m*-grains for one *m*(MilkyWay2T41KG):

Nc = *m/m*
= 8.6095566078347 T46

IF these grains with evenly separated spaces would fill
an entire Ψ30Kpc sphere enveloping the Milky Way galaxy, the mean average
distance between each grain of sand would be

CUBEs = [(4π/3)(30Kpc/2)^{3}/Nc]^{1/3}

= **168**.970
572960352 KM

As radially pushed outside the Ψ30Kpc sphere, the
thickness of such a shell with density

D = 2.323 t6KG/(168.97 KM)² = **1.37** 479 559860703
t11 KG/M³ would be (ShellTHICK)

V = *m*Σ/D = *m*MILKY/D = V(MILKY) =
(4π/3)(30Kpc/2)^{3} = **4.153** 498 09898697 T62 M³

V = Vout Vin = (4π/3)(Rout³ Rin³) ; V/(4π/3) = (Rout³ Rin³) ;

Rout³ = V/(4π/3) + Rin³ = (**8.013** 03745475883
T20 M)³ ;

ShellTHICK = Rout (Rin = 15Kpc) = **3.38**
452110421585 T20 M = **10**.968 4859506399 Kpc.

This result can
be compared with the corresponding TNED deduced (Radiation pressures force
equivalent RPFE Thermonuclear Radiation Pressure TRP):

The thermonuclear pressure FUNCTION it
has an INDUCTIVE feature takes on any electrically charged mass even the
neutral sand grains outer (Casimir) electron
cloud agents. Ideally we (hence) can calculate the molecular atomic Z (nuclear
charge) parameter on summing the individual atoms Z. For Quartz SiO2 it is
14+8+8=30.

The
corresponding °K temperature in our 1mM³ sand grain example resident on 15Kpc
distance from an ideal Milky Way central 2 T41 KG light producing mass is: 75
°K:

EarthMass2021IAU.ods Tabell3¦H82
part of inner cell blocks

T =
√ F/(30 Χ 8.54859 t22 Χ √[c/c0]) ......... = 75 °K: what we know: a
reasonable physical result

**NOTE that T here has only relevant
physical meaning from light produced by NUCLEAR reactions ****TNED says**.

With an
alternative r = 450Kpc the temperature arrives at T=2.5°K (general cosmic
background radiation temperature). No aspects taken on the other parameters.
Just as an illustrative example of the TNED deduced connections capabilities.

One single 1mM³ grain of sand in a mean
average space cube with side 169 KM (type Philadelphia-New York) is what we
know not possible even here on Earth (air) to get a specific spot on. The
less so outside a galaxy; »Mission Impossible». The K-cell spaces are huge.

Depending on
local mass ratio (*m*VIZ/**m**) corresponding calculations arrive at
corresponding possible sand grain distributions summing possible several
hundreds of galactic masses over the vast (3Mpc average) intergalactic spaces. At
the present (Dec2021) we have no exact information other than the TNED
deduced and claimed mathematical physics, further to be tested.

So:

**NOTE THE DENSITY PROBLEM on the modern academic idea of
dark matter. See Cambridge International Astronomy ****Quote****; The general ****TNED**** deduced K-cell mass ratio
mVIZ/mK=1/355 in the TNED radial Andromeda test has a (lowest) corresponding
local ratio of 1/267. It is TNED says the huge amount of ejected waste from
the primary J-body formations on ****sand
grain****:
general universal debris between the galactic clusters which has no theory of
composition in modern quarters. Depending on grain size (Example in ****MMLightMAC****), the TNED deduced thermonuclear
radiation pressure (**not the electro-kinetic modern counterpart[]**) pushes surrounding (sand) debris
out from the actual galactic regions (**TNED applications in THERMONUCLEAR
RADIATION PRESSURES FORCING IONIZATION EQUIVALENT ¦ CORONA
PHYSICS ¦ SOLAR WIND**):**

** The
electrically neutral silicon type debris grain material with hundreds of
kilometers of cubic spaces between nearby single grains is forced to reside
between the visually observable main galactic masses with no possible
instrumental method of (ever) being detected (the ****Quote****).**

** So: THE ACTUAL ****GRAVITATIONAL
DOPPLER EFFECT**** affection is RULED by these (TNED says) sand collected enormous
masses. Compared to the actually observable visual ones, these are practically
negligible. Testing the TNED gravitational results, we have to take these
aspects seriously into account:**

** Simple mass-gravitation
calculations on the actual galaxy masses will NOT lead to relevant explanations
says TNED.**

They are
obviously in that case in an inner K-cell gravitational equilibrium (see SAND ORIGIN) forming a possible perfect stationary platform for
measuring all other electromagnetically visible Doppler objects in our
universe.

IF the
conclusion is correct on the SITE of Andromeda K-center even the smallest
move of our Milky Way should expose some extra Doppler motional value. As that
MIGHT be the case in the AndromedaLATERAL issue provided Andromeda stays
put at the K-center the case is closed and settled:

Milky Way is
possibly at rest relative the Andromeda region with a possible (*the tricky lateral interpretation*) small rotation around the
Andromeda/K-cell center mass region.

A perfect best
dream type of occasion for (very) exact accurate light measuring tests.

AndTER: ITMres

**All units in TNED
are given as an MKSA international standard (***MKSA
basic***, ***MKSA history***) unless otherwise noted**

THE ANDROMEDA TEST RESULT:

*vEscape/3*=*v*KcellRIM

**The TNED K-cell
derived (****Kc0H****) expansion velocity has the basic simple form **** v**K

** That expression of the K-cell pacing is
based on equal gravitational energies: a contractive impact with a resulting
ejected expansive recoil (****K-cell Detonation****). **

** There are also minor losses (some ****0.7%****) in the K-cell expansive period from stars consuming mass for heat and
light (**as calculated from
comparing our Suns energy transfer**). **

** However, it is the (****KCHIP****) inner expanding J-bodies on their gravitational K-center favor by
physical principle that secures a halt moment for the expansion. The K-cell
heat physics principle builds on that inner expanding action but it has no
(yet) specific mathematical formulation except a general ****K-cell Heat Physics**** history.**

** In TNED physics
it is the K-cell surrounding ***c0-body*** (**endless supply of electromagnetically dormant neutrons,
never included as such in the K-cell mass physics history certified by the *General State Equation*s energy account**) that fills in
these (0.7%) mass-energy vacancies when expansion turns to contraction. THAT
the basic relation between the K-cell expanding velocity vK and the
general escape velocity vE expression shows the latter 3 times greater
at all times see **

** The (mathematical/practical) result of the
10Dec2021 Andromeda test further aligns with these results;**

** **

CENTRAL DENSITY INCREASE (20.82Gy) VERIFIED:

**K-cell density
D=m/V (TNED derived from the gravitational energy G m²/r and the **

** Any corresponding ****K-cell escape velocity**** parameter ( v**E

** The 10Dec2021 ****Andromeda Test**** has presented or strongly suggested such an imperative factor in
favor to the TNED cosmologically derived ****K-cell Heat Physics****. It is the dotted line between the blue and orange in the illustration
above: Higher in (**DENSITYin**), lower out:
»soft break». Theoretically, the dynamics are (hence) already clear from the
TNED deductions. **

** We needed some
(density) proof based on actual (Doppler) physical instrumental measures. Now
(10Dec2021) such a proof is suggested by the result of the Andromeda test.**

The TNED cosmological 10Dec2021 K-CELL *suggested*

ANDROMEDA PROOF (The ANDROMEDA
TEST)

strongly suggests THAT

The inner
Andromeda-Milky Way regional K-cell density

**(2.1-)6.5 t22** KG/M³ (MWR) near the actual Ψ30Kpc spherical
Milky Way average density

is profoundly (roughly four ten powers) higher than the
general basic average 20.82Gy total NOW K-cell density

**1.66 t26** KG/M³ as calculated by TNED cosmology from the K-cell Heat Physics
complex.

MEANING at present K-cell age 20.82Gy according to TNED
calculations:

Relative the general K-cell mean average constant
density

as the K-cell expands taken by max radius versus K-cell
mass (4.16 T53 KG)

the inner K-cell region around Andromeda and Milky Way
galaxies (2.13-2.36 T22 M, their separation distance taken by spherical radius)
has a profoundly higher, more centrally pushed density than the average K-cell
density.

MEANING:

A strong
indicative proof exists of (KCHIP) that the TNED deduced K-cell
density develops (*from start*) a higher inner density along with its
expansion:

MEANING:

The K-cell
experiences (KCHIP already from square one) a slowing down end station
arrival: the expansion is halted (336Gy ¦ K-cell
AGE); The
K-cell mass returns to contraction with a new expanding period provided the
10Dec2021 Andromeda test proof also IS genuine.

BACKGROUND (*The Ecological Universe ¦ **Universes
critical density*):

TNED cosmological mathematics has (had) serious issues
in trying to give strict mathematical proof for a K-cell density central
increase as the K-cell continues its expansion history. Several attempts have
been accomplished through the years all with one and the same short: it is
theoretical.

We needed some solid proof for an inner
higher K-cell density founded on some actual (Doppler) measures.

The 10Dec2021 Andromeda test result entered the scene
and gave us A POSSIBLE, EVEN STRONG, one although the test was not aimed at
anything at all in concern of density issues: it came as a bonus (*we always
get credit for trying ..*).

THE MASS RING
ANALOGY

GRAVITATION INSIDE SPHERICAL SHELLS

An early study (*authors archive from 1983*) with
one ball inside a ring of surrounding balls, left illustration part, showed by
gravity force vector addition the typical elliptic vector collecting shape with
all the contributions from the surrounding equally spaced and equally physical
mass balls: Least from above. Most from below the central horizontal ring line.
The right side of the illustration summarizes the calculating result:

A growing
number of surrounding balls focuses the attracting force with growing magnitude
to the lower part of the ring.

Nearest ring side takes the ball.

The simple mass ring analogy can (easily by thought *multiple
rings*) be transfered to a hollow spherical analogy by projection:

Taking the given rings vector contributions from its
turning (*showing an ellipse*) around the vertical central line, resembles
the addition of vector contributions on any spherical corresponding sum of
rings (with evenly spaced individual mass points).

The summing
impression says that a single mass left alone inside a hollow (density
homogeneous) sphere will be attracted to that side of the inner spherical wall
to which the central ball shows a deviating position.

MATHEMATICS is not the problem.

Problem is using its content by *deduction*.
Zero invention: Talk to me. Say something intelligent.

SAND IN UNIVERSE
by TNED

In TNED cosmology quite other conditions reside compare
initial quote frεm Wikipedia on Cosmic Dust.

The deduced
and derived TNED CAP (concentric atomic production) from the CWON (*complete whole number solutions*)
isotopic revelations and their mutually certified (MATIK) Earth crust and atmosphere basics
(*basic netron
nuclear matrices*)

jH2O ¦ **BioGAS** ¦ BioEK1-10 ¦ TheTEN ¦ AR123 ¦ CWON ¦ CAP ¦ MATIK NEUTRON
NUCLEAR PRIMARY BIOCHEMICAL
MATRICES¦ THE PERIODIC SYSTEM ¦ Inner distribution of elements

leave no doubt about the (simple) possible TNED
cosmological arrangements:

The primary
J-bodies surfaces SERVES THE PURPOSE during their initial morphological
chemical formations following the short and powerful fusion phase.

CORE CHEMICAL
MATRICES *cosmic assembly*

** **

**Central molecular
morphology only difference: Chlorophyll imperative insolation energy agent
for development of all life: Leaf&Needle has a Magnesium atom at it
center, while Hemoglobin has an Iron atom (Source FM1975: ****KloHem****).**

**CAP** ¦ Primary distribution of elements inside Earth ¦ DIAsquare ¦ BaseCHART ¦ CELESTIAL bodies building time from Dmax to
Dnormal¦ Modern academy: water
from the outer

In modern academic theory, these possibilities are
completely absent all because modern academy never got to THE DEDUCTION OF (*the electric charge Q** and*) THE ATOMIC
NUCLEUS
TNED: Planck constant *h=mcr*; the neutron: *gravitations
fundamental form*: gravitating mass, and how it works.

SAND: Sand in Universe

SAND

Especially the heavier primary J-bodies wasting
enormous amounts av debris type cosmic dust and grain particles (mM sand
grains) containing roughly 5-10 T19 individual
atoms in one single small 0.5-1 mM packages have specific surface
ejecting potential for producing grain mineralogical material of type sand (type common Earth eroded and weathered crust matter)
during the primary body formation.

TNED EXAMPLES OF COMPRESSED Primary
CHEMICAL-NUCLEAR-NEUTRON MATRIX SYSTEMS of type SAND

Single
electromagnetically dormant neutrons are packed tight in primary K-cell detonated
ejected J-bodies:

On
electromagnetic activation (The DIER) a neutron decay (normally 12-14 minutes) on a morphological
forcing (negative magnetic moment)
procedure possibly arranges the tightly packed neutrons in a basic (seen down from above at a J-body surface) of
(here named »basic carbon neutron nuclear
matrix») completely plane filling pattern with no vacant spaces, as
suggested:

This matrix depending on conditions determined by the
J-bodys mass (and its eventual gravitational
interfering with other near J bodies) decides itself its own private
morphological structure with in principle unlimited combinations leading to
single atoms or chemically composed atomic system blocks (molecules):

Each layer, a
spherical J-body shell, will have, or receive, a common nuclear decay (time)
window from which the tightly lying neutron decayed now hydrogen nuclei will
begin heavy and fast exothermal fusion processes as long as there are
adjacent nuclei inside of each others nuclear barrier (in TNED meaning inside the toroids own circumscribed sphere: details
from *Fusion
Ring*).

The TNED two
basic atomic/nuclear equations guarantee that the electron masses from the
decays always exist in the vicinity.

Meaning: They are there, ready to fill out the space
vacancies appearing all together as new atomic nuclei are formed on
neutralizing otherwise repelling electric forces between the newly produced
atomic nuclei.

The process
certifies a direct most tight possible chemical material bond between any
accepted new near chemically co-working atoms. Such as (simplest examples SiO2 Quartz molecules in »endless» plane filling
paragons)

**IF such a neutron
nuclear molecular matrix exists on a primary developing J-bodys surface, and the ejected force from
the introducing fusion phase is powerful enough for that specific J-body,
individual grains microscopic to visual have the possibility to form
individual projectile objects with (very very) high initial velocity. That is
the TNED cosmic scenario in part in this (CAP concentric atomic production)
treatise.**

** **

**CAP** ¦ Primary distribution of elements inside Earth ¦ DIAsquare ¦ BaseCHART ¦ CELESTIAL bodies building time from Dmax to
Dnormal¦ Modern academy: water
from the outer

**MAC, modern
academy: no atomic nucleus (Planck constant ****h=mcr****: the
neutron) deduction. ****TNED****, Related
physics: it is imperative. All of it.**

collecting/resolving QUARTZ Silicon Dioxide (*as long
as the warehouse has the material components*).

NOTE that there are several (MANY) ways to COMBINE the
neutrons in a specific morphologic connection (giving alternative paragon
views): The structures here are only those most simple and direct (to the
author, at the present).

SOME EXAMPLES OF HOW VARYING ASSEMBLY FORMATION ON THE
SAME ATOMIC COMPONENTS SiO2 EXPOSE DIFFERENT END MOLECULAR MATRICES (*introducing
possible mixtures .. on other near layers*):

*Straight vertical-horizontal with possible hollow
vacancies »for other complementary»:*

We see that EASILY MANY SiO2 molecules could be
produced this way over entire J-body spherical neutron shell layers. Once
they have formed a chemical bond *from this most tight origin*, no present
available force exist to tear them apart.

If you know the chemical formula make your own
archive of possible candidates provided an appropriate computer picture
handling program (Microsoft has none *except
the old Paintbrush from Windows 3.1 which The New Microsoft after Bill Gates
killed, too* this author had to make his own through the years [*»stupid
Microsoft and other programmers killed assembler and pixels .. zero computer
knowledge fuckups .. after Bill Gates, the only reasonable Windows inventor
working groups .. they gave us great hope on the future .. that the new Microsoft
owners killed, effectively, harshly and brutally .. : they dont even
understand The Concept»*]).

*Mirror assembly horizontal extension with no hollow
vacancies »for other complementary»:*

»UnameIt, WeveGotIt».

QUARTZ SiO2

is known to be one of the most weathering-erosive
resistant materials.

OR possibly a more complex candidate .. (»calcium
sand») WHITE SAND

**Calcium Carbonate** CaCO3:

The more different types of atoms in a single composed
molecule, the more possible combinations to arrive at the same molecular end
station with possible mutually slight different inner atomic binding material
structures.

That should be as close to the Stars (and their heavens)
as we possibly could reach (»heaven on Earth» literally).

SAND it was. No Problemo.

The next Issue on
our Agenda would be:

HOW DOES IT TRAVEL? See SandTRAVEL.

SandTRAVEL: Sand in universe ¦ **UniverseSAND** ¦ **SAND** ¦

HOW DOES A
POSSIBLE GRAIN OF SAND TRAVEL TO OUR REGIONS FROM A FAR AWAY SOURCE?

* First; It has
to fly fast, very fast with a minimum cross section area, securing its intact
form on arrival unless crashed on the way in meeting others. We will
math-test a typically J-body ejected type 1mM grain of Sand by TNED
cosmological elementary equations. No big deal.*

Basic CHEOPS LIGHT-GRAVITATION MATH details ¦ K-cell Detonation ¦ Fig.1 TNED, MAC,
Einstein and Schwarzchild on LIGHT and GRAVITATION ¦

.. foundation of
freedom, justice and peace in the world ..: IF YOU CARE for my
privacy, how come YOU interrupt me in my work without my permission? Out. Not
one word:

ALL no exceptions OTHER
INDIVIDUAL ADDRESSING DEFINES EXERCISING OPPRESSION: not-freedom, not-justice,
not-peace. Say again. Come again.

*r*VIZ?

LIGHT from stars generate a Doppler red shift (K=1.5) during the K-cell expansion
forcing a limited visibility of normally resting objects. *r*VIZ is the
corresponding RIM of that ideal universe's sphere beyond which still stars do
exist but whose light is shut down because of a (TNED combined) Doppler red
shift + a general Gravitational redshift (modern academy's dark energy).

As the redshift is stronger in the beginning than the
end of the (gradually decreasing) expansion, more universe appears by time.

The *r*VIZ
value 1025 Mpc comes from the (Oct2018) IAU test on Suns photometric effect
here (ResTAB ¦ SunMASS) further clarified by specific
samples of the iteration method.

HOW TO NAVIGATE INSIDE THE K-CELL TNED COSMOLOGY
DERIVED UNIVERSE K-CELL HEAT PHYSICS

*Basic properties*

*Given the principle physical strict cosmological
formation of sand (**SAND**)*

IN RELATING THE POSSIBLE HISTORY OF ONE SINGLE GRAIN OF
SAND possibly traveling from a location where stars and galaxies are born (TNED RELATED GRB OBJECTS: Origin ¦ Interpretation *echoes from dying or born?*¦
), finally arriving at Earth *not only in our time of universal history*,
TNED cosmological basic math as illustrated forces a general limited time
window:

Ejected debris
(sand) is only actual from sites where stars and galaxies are born.

As suggested in the illustration, this type of
phenomena ends (TNED says) after 16.6Gy of K-cell expansion (the **tPmax**
point of time).

c03p6: SandTRAVEL

y, Year ¦ Tt = 10↑± ¦ Gy =
T9y; G prefix: Giga, billion Ga, GigaYearAgo

Depending on
velocity lowest *v=c* ejected debris will cease as a cosmo-logic
phenomena some 11.7Gy ahead TNED says.

Possible (such)
grains of sand reaching Earth today hence have a latest origin stamp event
horizon of some 20.8216.3=4.52Ga.

Depending on
ejected velocity (energy transfer when meeting Earths atmosphere) the
traveling time 4.52Gy with a highest possible *v* from that last possible
primary star birth region (4.52Ga) defines a that highest possible sand grain
velocity by

(*r*@16.3Gy = 1.54 T26 M)/4.52Gy = 3.6*c*_{0} ;

highest possible sand grain velocity
from latest possible region with primary birth of stars and galaxies TNED cosmological deductions only

*Grains with possible still higher velocity have already
passed*

IF such a (rare) 1mM³ *m*=2.32 t6 KG grain of sand
impacts the Earths atmosphere, the ideal energy release becomes

E*kin* = *mv²*/2 = (2.32 t6 KG)(3.6*c*_{0})²/2
= **8.44** 0187902486 **T30** eV = **8.44** **T24** MeV = **8.44
T18** GeV = **1.352** 1181 **T12** J

In LITERARY REFERENCES (ENCARTA 99 in *Muons and
Multiple c*) established sources report a highest observed impact energy from cosmic
radiation of type 1 T20 eV = 1 T11 GeV a (very) small spouse to our rare 1mM³
sand grain.

The original TNED text in the Muon article uses the mass
of a proton for comparison leading to such huge velocities than even TNED
cannot deduce them from the ejected (GRB) objects. See COSMIC PARTICLE RADIATIONS ORIGIN.

The only possible TNED solution is the max 3.6*c*_{0} on a much
smaller (corresponding) sand particle:

*m* = 2(E=1 T20 eV)/(*max*3.6*c*_{0})² = 2(16.02 J)/(3.6*c*_{0})²
= **2.75** 071819413256 **t17** KG ;

With SiO2 [*atomic weight U=60u*] Quartz density D =
2320 KG/M³:

→ SandCUBEvolume =
*m*/D = **6.381** 66621038753 t14 M³

→ SandCUBEside =
V^{1/3} = **3.996**
17680746133 t5 M ~ **40**΅M

→ SandCUBEatoms =
*m*/U*u* = **2.761 T8** SiO2 atomic
groups

Possibly. And (very rare) likely, TNED says.

How is that in detail?

TNED has a
potential power to give the details down to each specific electron.

FirstIssue: 3.6c0

*First issue:*

WHAT HAPPENS TO A GRAIN OF SAND IN TNED COSMOLOGY
WHEN ITS MECHANICALLY CAUSED VELOCITY EXCEEDS THE LOCAL c-VALUE?

** **

**A treatise on the
subject in TNED (Apr2007 ****MECHANIC-ELECTRIC CONNECTION****) is as described in this illustration (****THE MAGNETIC WINDOW****):**

** The PRINCIPLE type of theory has no modern
academic representation:**

** Inside a closed
electric circuit its providing local divergence (speed of light) certifies that
no velocity higher than c can be given an object that is electrically
accelerated on the systems energy account.**

** Approaching the c-limit, a principal
unlimited (K approaches infinity) amount of electrical energy (voltage) can be
supported to the object, yet with practically no resulting higher velocity.**

** The elongated
(red) curve represents the classic mechanic type function solution without
the practically limiting K factor.**

*Not included i modern quarters:*

A MECHANICALLY ACCELERATED OBJECT has no connection to
velocity restrictions associated with electricity (*Lights
liberty clause** in related physics: light connects not to kinetics*). See also the deduction of the electric
charge:

Q = √ (*m*/R)(*A*/*dt*) *where conflicting issues
appear on Time and Temperature, this production uses t for time and T for
temperature. The designation below should be for time*:

In
electro-physics Q is preserved independent of its (system-) relative change of
mass (*m*) BECAUSE the same proportional (accelerating) property
accounts for the resistive factor (R) see *Planck Equivalents*: *m*/R = constant.

In MECHANICS, **no
R exists** and therefore not one single scientific *mechanical*
experiment exists showing otherwise:

Neither *m* nor R is affected in kinetics. *But
this simple related physical foundation has no representation in modern
corridors*: **modern academy cannot deduce Q** and cannot explain the
mass increase phenomena in electro-physics.

TwoMainPossibilities:
FirstISSUE

All macroscopic
electromagnetism becomes invisible: hidden on *v>c*:

** **

**TNED**** explains phenomena:**

THERE ARE TWO MAIN POSSIBILITIES (TNED says):

1. The J-body
neutron nuclear matrix (SAND) surface is ejected with such a
pace that the neutron nuclear matrix divides into smaller neutron tight close
microscopical neutron spheres traveling away so fast (*v>c*) that the
normal macroscopic electromagnetism NEVER gets a chance to develop a
conventional neutron decay:

The D*max* 1.87 T17 KG/M³ »neutron
mass-pearls» stays PUT as such until met with some object on a rude impact:
the neutron pearl continues to be a compact Dmax mass unit until neutron decay
is completed and a normal primary internal exothermal fusion forms a pack of
some molecular material grain perhaps a grain of quartz sand.

2. SOME
CONVENTIONAL NEUTRON DECAY TIME PASSES before the surface matrix ejects with
our suggested *v>c*. Now we have a possible already formed grain of
sand pacing away on *v>c* into the vast spaces:

PROVIDED A
FIRST EXISTENT F(B*toroid*)+F(*e*Z) FORCE FIELD forming the actual
molecular material IT must experience a LOSS an electromagnetic decrease in
force AS the grain enters the border *v=c*. Clearly.

What is POSSIBLY happening THERE?

**TNED**** explains
phenomena:**

Reduced force (F=*ma*=*mv/t=p/t*) means: less
TIME to »catch up mass» or GIVE time to a linear momentum *p=mv* on an
already given pace (*v*).

Inevitably
some of the grains outer electron masses (*Casimir* region) will be lost forming a
tail after the *v>c* pacing grain.

SIMULTANEOUSLY The nuclear charge (Z) loses potential:

Decreasing
Coulomb (ionizing) repellant force favors increasing gravitation:

IF ALL Coulomb
(ionizing) repellant force is supressed, ONLY gravitation is left to »take
over».

BUT: Each g-body also has a zero gravitating CENTER
where a c>0 always is guaranteed PROVIDED the mass object is not
gravitationally affected »compromised» (fucked up) by a local dominant
g-field.

AS SPACES
BETWEEN GALAXIES AND STAR FORMATIONS IN OUR UNIVERSE ARE HUGE and the general
gravitational potentials between them over the huges average distances
cancel on a net zero, there should be some left possibilities for grains to
represent their own local dominant gravitational fields, however very weak
depending on their inner gravitational morphology (*with eventual rest of
some macroscopic Coulomb fields*). Meaning:

THE ALREADY
SHAPED AND ESTABLISHED GRAIN MOLECULAR FORM WILL NOT SPLIT OR DEGENERATE
although »the outer rim» of the grain will have a reduced electron crew.

THERE IS A »lost electron mass REFILL POSSIBILITY» HERE
inelastic impact with practically zero losses:

** **

**As explained in ****SPECTRUM AND QUANTUM NUMBERS**** and ****POLARIZATION
PHENOMENA**** and ****ELECTRONS BUBBLE CHAMBER TRACKS**** the electron in not a particle but a quantized amount of mass: the TNED
deduced tau-rings (τ). Specifically the bubble chamber electron tracks,
says TNED, is impossible to explain from an idea that the electron is what is
called in modern corridors a point particle. **

** When the
electron is accelerated by a voltage, its tau-rings tail magnetically on a line
which type-ring-coil of adjacent tau-rings excellently do explain in detail
the observed bubble chamber tracks. **

** **

**Accelerated/Travelling
electrically charged rings follow the simple MAGNETIC FEATURE: the rings are
mutually magnetically alined on one single trajectory track. Energy losses
limits the time window of the travel. And the effect of the instrumental
magnetic field B causes the cylinder rod to rotate: the collected ring cylinder
oscillates between a maximum elonged and a maximum compressed cylinder rod. All
mathematically expressable in every single detail.**

** **

** A corresponding explanation in modern
quarters has been searched for: not found.**

** Around 1925 (****Gamow quote****) Heisenberg and Schrφdinger gave almost a full explanation to the
spectrum of atoms on the use of corresponding so called vibrators: the
tau-ring components. Indeed. Matrices and wave functions, same result.**

** 1927 these
highly revealing vibrators were abandoned by Heisenberg referring to the
theory of relativity. **

** Modern academic teaching system had it all
on the table 1925+. But chose to turn its back on it. **

** Some
achievements in the history of modern academic ideas of physics are definitely
and certainly more prominent than others.**

** In polarization: The tau-rings excellently
explain absorption and reflexion according to already well known observations.**

** In spectrum and quantum numbers: The
tau-rings explain with more detail than modern academy can fathom the body
behind the quantum concept.**

TAILING
ELECTRON MASSES behind our exemplified *v>c* pacing material grain will
reside in their »left-over» general *c*-space between galaxies and star
clusters:

With no
attracting source, the now freely space-existing tau-rings diverge spread out
due to their negative charge. And they eventually end up as typical »resting
objects» relative the average distance positions between galaxies and stars.

IF our *v>c* pacing sand grain partially
deprived some of its matter-side outer electron masses as suggested collides
with such a *v=*0 tau-ring, a simple inelastic impact calculations math
shows that the overall energy (kinetic speed) of the sand grain is practically
preserved intact;

GENERAL IMPACT FEATURES (*School physics lectures in
any general literature on the subject*)

A complete
elastic impact preserves linear momentum *p=mv* and kinetic energy E*=mv²/*2
;

An inelastic
impact preserves linear momentum *with more or less loss in kinetic energy*;

**In any
case: **

E = F*d*
= *mad* = *m*(*dv/dt*)*d* = *m*(*v*²/2*d*)*d*
= *mv*²/2 = *mv·v*/2* = p·v*/2 = *hf = mc² *

The linear momentum property (quantity of motion:
impulse) *p=mv* is apparently a non destructable part of the property of
energy (E). As energy cannot be created nor destroyed, linear momentum is
principally equally impossible to get rid of. One way or the other: in
mechanic-physics as well as in electro-physics.

LINEAR MOMENTUM by itself F*t* = *mat =m*(*v/t*)*t*
*= mv = p = linear momentum* IS TIME INDEPENDENT *as gravitation *GRIP* is*. ONCE GIVEN:

CANNOT BE
DESTROYED. ONLY DISTRIBUTED OVER *other* SUMMING MASSES AND VELOCITIES:

Equal for all matter, cannot be shielded from: **time
independent**.

FOUNDATION OF INSTRUMENTATION

THE HEART OF THE REAL WORLD

PRACTICAL
MECHANICS, INDUSTRY AND TRADE.

** But this type
of (causality, causal reasoning) was banned during the 1800+ evolution in
modern academic idea ***its comprehensive fathomness *** of existence in general and universe in explicit.** Compare The LIST.

See ENERGY LAW ¦ IN RELATED PHYSICS ¦ PRINCIPLE OF MOTION: impulse interval *p=mv*
precedes force. Impossible to destroy. See also *Intervals
indestructability*. All basic elementary physics, logics and mathematics that modern academy
1800+ banned. Foremost result: no atomic nucleus
deduction.

* Addressing
Logics Outside Existence: Academic Never Proclaimed Insanity. »Humanitys 1800+
Dead End».*

RELATED * deduced exemplified exercise on 100%
inelastic impact we need familiarity with some basic insight into the
machinery;*

**InELASTIC**

AFTER IMPACT BOTH BODIES SHARE SAME VELOCITY:

**100% INELASTIC IMPACT**: *v* = (**c***v*A + *v*B)/(**c** +
1) ¦ **c** = *m*A/*m*B ¦ EX = ½ ;
←=+:

*a*: ....... *v = *(**c***v*A
+ *v*B)/(**c** + 1) = (**½·0** + 10)/(½ + 1) = 20/3 = 6.67 M/S

*b*: ....... *v = *(**c***v*A
+ *v*B)/(**c** + 1) = (**½·5** + 5)/(½ + 1) = 5(1/3) = 1.67 M/S

*c*: ....... *v = *(**c***v*A
+ *v*B)/(**c** + 1) = (**½·10** + 5)/(½ + 1) = **0** M/S

PRESERVED
LINEAR MOMENTUM *p=mv same result:*

*v***0**[*m*_{0}(*beforeImpact*)] ± *w*[*m*(*beforeImpact*)] = *v*[M(= *m*_{0}
+ *m*)*after impact*]

**5**[4] **5**[2] = *v*[4 + 2] = **5**([4] [2]
= 2) = 10 ;

*v*_{0}[←*m*_{0}] *w*[→*m*] = *v*[*m*_{0} + *m* = M] ;

*v* = *v*_{0}([←*m*_{0}] *w*[→*m*])/[M] ;

*v* = *v*_{0}([*m*_{0}] ± *w*[*m*])/[M] ;

ELASTIC: Found

100% ELASTIC

*Recoil action if mA<mB ¦ assuming vB=***0**:

100% ELASTIC IMPACT *impulse*:

*m*A*v*A + **0** = *m*A*v*A + *m*B*v*B ; **c** = *m*A/*m*B ¦
EX = 1/2 ;

*m***Bc***v*A + **0** = *m*Bc*v*A
+ *m*B*v*B ;

**c***v*A = **c***v*A
+ *v*B ;
**c***v*_{0}* = ***c***v + w* ; **c**^{2}*v*_{0}^{2}*
= *(**c***v + w*)^{2} = **c**^{2}*v*^{2}*
+ w*^{2} + 2**c***vw* ;

; **c***v*_{0}^{2}* =* **c***v*^{2}*
+ w*^{2}/**c** + 2*vw*

100% ELASTIC IMPACT *conserved energy*:

*m*A*v*A² + **0** = *m*A*v*A² + *m*B*v*B² ;

*m***Bc***v*A² + **0** = *m*Bc*v*A²
+ *m*B*v*B² ;

**c***v*A² = **c***v*A²
+ *v*B² ; **c***v*_{0}^{2}*
= ***c***v*^{2}* + w*^{2} = **c***v*^{2}* +
w*^{2}/**c** + 2*vw* ;

----------------

**c***v*^{2}* + w*^{2} = **c***v*^{2}* + w*^{2}/**c** + 2*vw* ;

*w*^{2} = *w*^{2}/**c**
+ 2*vw* ;

*w*^{2} *w*^{2}/**c
**= 2*vw =* *w*^{2}(1 1/**c**) ;

2*vw =* *w*^{2}(1 1/**c**) ;

2*v =* *w*(1 1/**c**) ;

*v =* *w*(1 1/**c**)/2 ;

**c***v*_{0}* = ***c***v + w* ;

**c***v*_{0}* w = ***c***v * ;

*v*_{0}* w*/**c*** = v * ;

*v*_{0}* w*/**c*** = w*(1 1/**c**)/2
;

*v*_{0}* = w*(1 1/**c**)/2 *+ w*/**c**
;

*v*_{0}* = w*[(1 1/**c**)/2
*+ *1/**c**] ;

*v*_{0}* = w*[1/2 1/2**c**
*+ *2/2**c**] ;

*v*_{0}* = w*[1/2 + 1/2**c**] ;

*v*_{0}* = w*[1 + 1/**c**]/2 ;

*w = *2*v*_{0}/[1 + 1/**c**] = *v*B ; **c** = *m*A/*m*B ¦ EX = 1/2
.......... **[***m*A**]**→
__... [mB]__:

*v*B* = *2*v*A/[1 + 1/**c**]
; 2·2/[1 + 2] = 4/3 = 1.3 M/S

*v*A = *v*A *v*B/**c** ;
2 2(4/3) = 2 8/3 = 2/3 = 0.67 M/S *Recoil direction automatically
included*

---------------- ;
(2·**2**² + 4·**0**²)/2 = **4** = (2[**2/3**]² + 4[**4/3**]² =
8/9 + 64/9 = 72/9 = 8)/2 = **4**; *energy conserved*

InELASTIC: ELASTIC

100% InELASTIC

*After impact both bodies share same velocity*

100% InELASTIC IMPACT *impulse*:

*m*A*v*A + *m*B*v*B = *m*A*v* + *m*B*v* ; **c** = *m*A/*m*B ¦
EX = 1/2 ;

*m*A*v*A + *m*B*v*B = *v*(*m*A + *m*B) ; *m*Bc*v*A + *m*B*v*B
= *v*(** mBc** +

**c***v*A + *v*B
= *v*(**c** + 1) ;
*v* = (**c***v*A + *v*B)/(**c** + 1) ;

100% InELASTIC IMPACT *energy before impact*:

E = (*m*A*v*A² + *m*B*v*B²)/2 ; (2·**0**² + 4·10²)/2
= 200.0 J

100% InELASTIC IMPACT *energy after impact*:

E = (*m*A + *m*B)*v²*/2 ; (2 + 4)(20/3)*²*/2
= 133.3 J

Calculating the
possible sand grain free space travel

SITUATION: A
group of atoms (*formerly composed from a
tight neutron grain, as they are accelerated out of a fast expanding primary
J-body through its internal divergence ignition*) exceed the local
divergence (*c*) by their mechanically ejected velocity *v*:

A state of »multiple *c*» has arrived.

What about the
atoms inner normal molecular connections?

*Can it be thoroughly mathematically-physically described
by TNED?*

Yes. So it seems. We study how.

vEJECT: InELASTIC

EarthMass2021IAU.ods Tabell3¦E82

From the TNED deduced K-cell expansion physics, a
J-bodys divergence activation entails a gravitational equivalent to a correspinding
contractive recoil phase:

The J-body
with primary mass *m* expands from Dmax up to Dnormal on a general ejected
highest surface velocity

*v* = *m*^{1/3}(0.011041
M/KG^{1/3}S)

With our earlier calculated highest possible 3.6*c*_{0} kinetic
velocity as a messenger from the last possible TNED cosmologically deduced
birth of stars and galaxies, the actual primary J-body mass would have to be

*m* = **469.4 SunMasses** =
9.339947492 T32 KG **matching 3.6***c*

*about* (9.34 T32 KG) / (2 T41 KG) = 4.67
t9 of our Milky Way mass: a rough 214 millionth part.

TAKING THE (TOM) ALTERNATIVE 2:

THE OUTERMOST
ATOMS ON all six sides of the ideal sand grain cube will (most likely) lose
some of their electron masses. A tail of these are left behind the pacing grain
as the electromagnetic force loses its (imminent outer) grip on the material
object *as it has been interpreted in this example* with a corresponding
result that the reduced internal electric forces renders a gain on
corresponding gravitational grasp and tug.

COSMOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCE:

1. **As the
ejected debris **in TNED (355/1) means a huge overrepresentation relative the visual
mass (*mVIZ*), a corresponding possible huge
phenomenal (ejection complex) leftover electronmasses possibly populate
»the empty spaces» between galaxies and star clusters.

2. **The
electron mass quantity** in TNED (ElectronFEATURE) as composed of tau-rings
(explained explicitly in SPECTRUM AND QUANTUM NUMBERS) are inevitablu internal
DIVERGENT on their negative ring charge (TAU ¦ Q=*e*/**n**): they spread out with maximun mutual distances.

TNED Proton
illustration with a comparing possible electron mass specification based on
deducing details in ElectronFEATURE.

**TNED
estimated/calculated number of tau rings (»****Heisenbergs 1927
vibrators****») in one electron mass (see ****Casimir Effect****): n = 673 026.**

** When most
tightly formed as periodically in the ****ANNIHILATION PROCESS**** the tau rings (possibly) form a cylinder with length 1.96 t16 M and
diameter 2.74 t17 M. See also, unless already aquainted: ****THE NEUTRON DECAY****.**

3. **High ( v>c)
pace material grains** impacting such free space residing tau-rings can
hence be treated on a general 100%
INELASTIC IMPACT occasion possibly »collecting and cleaning up» previously
left over tau-rings from high speed grains. Thereby a NEUTRALIZING explanation
partly or completely is introduced on a possible net loss of electron mass
during

POSSIBLE RESULT:

When each front side of the ideal sand grain cube
(pacing some space on 3.6*c*) meets with a single individual tau (τ)
ring

*m*τ = 0.000548598*u*/**n** = **1.353370772 t36**
KG *at relative res .. v = ***0**
= *vA*

*m* = 2.32 t6 KG 1mM³ Quartz
sand grain *ideally: ............. v*
= **3.6***c*_{0} = *vB*

**c** = *m*τ/*m*
= 1.35 t36 / 2.32 t6 ~ **5.82 t31**

100% InELASTIC IMPACT *resulting velocity v* (*related examples explain the details*)

*v* = (**c***v*A + *v*B)/(**c**
+ 1) = (**5.82 t31** · **0** + **3.6***c*_{0})/(**c**
+ 1 = **1.000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 582**)

= **3.6***c*_{0}
; *practically no change at
all*.

EVEN IF WE TAKE ALL THE AVAILABLE ELECTRON MASSES ON ALL
SIX FRONT SURFACE SIDES OF THE 1mM³ sand grain cube

On each 1mM square surface with a 2.5Ε=0.25nM=2.5 t10 M
mean Quartz SiO2 molecular distance there are (0.001M)²/(2.5Ε=2.5 t10 M)² = **1.6
T13** SiO2 entities;

six sides sum **9.6 T13** cube surface SiO2
entities:

Each SiO2 entity has a maximum of Z=14+16=30 electron
atomic masses:

Assuming all 30 removed from each of the cubes sic
surface sides yields a total six side removed

number of removed surface electrons N = 30 Χ **9.6 T13**
= **2.88 T15** *me with a total mass of*

*me¦*SUM = 0.000548598*u* Χ **2.88 T15** ~ **2.62 t15** KG

**c** = *m*τ/*m*
= **2.62 t15** / 2.32 t6 ~ **1.13 t9**

the result still claims

*v* = (**c***v*A + *v*B)/(**c**
+ 1) = (**1.13 t9** · **0** + **3.6***c*_{0})/(**1.13 t9**
+ 1 = **1.000 000 00113**)

= **3.5999999959***c*_{0}
; STILL *practically no change
at all*.

The grain paces the spaces practically unhindered until
met with some bigger object.

HOW BIG to reduce the *v*B to a near (1M/S)
zero? ANSWER:

*v* = **3.6***c*_{0}/(**c**
+ 1) = 1 M/S *demands that* **3.6***c*_{0}
= (**c** + 1)1M/S = (*M/m* + 1)1M/S ;
**3.6***c*_{0}S/M 1 = *M/m*

**M** = *m*(**3.6***c*_{0}S/M
1)* =* (**2.32 t6** KG)(**1 079 252 849** M/S) = **2 503.87**
KG : *about 2.5 ton for halting the ***3.6***c*_{0}*
grain intruder (2.5 M³ ocean water)*.

THE HIGH PACE
GRAIN OF SAND TAKES NO SLOWING IN RECOLLECTING FULL ELECTRON CREW.

THE QUEST OF
THE CONSTANT MASS OF THE EARTH AS SUGGESTED ..

*The Practical Earth side of The Sand Expedition * mJbalance ¦ UniverseSAND

THE TOTAL SAND
GRAIN ACCOUNT

IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANY INSTRUMENTAL EXPEDITION TO MEASURE OR
OBSERVE IS ONE SINGLE SAND GRAIN PER 1 SQUARE EARTH SURFACE METER ARRIVING
HERE ONCE EVERY 12 YEARS:

* That would explain a possible amount of sand of the
existing amount on Earths surface exactly balancing the annual atmospheric
mass escape of hydrogen and helium. Possibly*.

Because, what we know, its low frequency of possible
arrival and small dimension cannot be instrumentally observed over the
relatively large area (1 grain of sand per
1M²/12y or 1 grain per 12M²/y), the possibility represents an open quest
that, what we know, cannot be settled by any instrumental observation or
registration (*no such instrumentation exists: too low arriving frequency
over too large area by too small mass*).

COSMIC TNED DEDUCED PRODUCED SAND HELPS US POSSIBLY DEFINE

An EARTHS MASS POSSIBLE
CONSTANT: »AtmosphericOUT = CosmicIN»?

The international Cambridge
ASTRONOMY source 1977/78 (BA1978s244sp2mn) suggests with a high
degree of uncertainty that a total ca 1000 ton (extremely uncertain) per
24h of microscopic interstellar dust is added to Earth.

That is (at most) **1000 T3**
KG · 365d =

**36.5 T7** KG/y

with a possible lowest margin we cannot state (yet). The newer data
below Dec2021 may (or may not) be more accurate: there are still (possibly,
relatively large) uncertainties. See CODITA source below.

Some website domains Dec2021 on the subject Earth mass losses seem not
to mention this (older possible) main influence;

Wikipedia, Earth mass: [*microscopic* 22Nov2021: ..
including
micrometeorites and cosmic dust ..

The combined effect is a net loss of material estimated at 5.5 Χ 10^7 kg
.. per year., .. [citation needed].

9.5 T7 KG Hydrogen + 0.16 T7 KG
Helium OUT, = 9.66 T7 minus 4.16 T7 stuff IN:

out **9.66 T7** KG/y ¦ 9.5
T7 KG Hydrogen + 0.16 T7 KG Helium

in **4.16 T7** KG/y

netout **5.50 T7** KG/y *the
Wikipedia source with recognized uncertainties*

WIKIPEDIA REFERENCES (CODITA 2012)

renders a more detailed picture of the sources:

H **9.50 T7** KG/y OUT

He **0.16 T7** KG/y OUT ...... plus some minor additional
satellite space debris .. ;

sum **9.66 T7** KG/y ¦ 264 658 KG/d

*Cosmic dust:* 100-300 ton/d =

**3.65-**

** 10.95 T7** KG/y IN
»huge discrepancy» (*uncertain frequency
of larger meteorites counts ..*)

Satellite observations suggest that 100-300 tonnes of cosmic dust enters
the atmosphere each day.

This figure tallies with ..

netOUT =

**6.01**

**0.96 T7** KG/y
.......... close to balance out=in *on
largest*

vary by a factor of hundred,

CODITA-source: UK-GERMANY National Astronomy Meeting
NAM2012: measuring the cosmic dust swept up by the Earth

.. measurements in the earth's atmosphere indicate that the input could
be as low as 5 tonnes per day ..

**1.825 T6** KG/y

netOUT = 9.66 T7 0.1825 T7 =

**9.4775 T7** KG/y *...... @ present time 2021: measurements (near
2000), 20 years data collection*

These figures are more precise than the older Cambridge
Astronomy figure

(with attested high uncertainty
suggested: 1000 ton/d).

The hydrogen escape (ConBEAT ¦ HESC)
process in the Earth's top atmosphere Sun's dissolving water molecule
insolation splitting Planck energy takes (Wikipedia, Earth mass: see ConBEAT)
9.5 T7 KG/y. A corresponding water decrease is restored (possibly in exact
balance) through crust erosion liberating integrated lithospheric water:
initially 19mSEA lithospheric + 1 stationary 1mSEA. The balance then results in a
constant surface mSEA= 1.4 T21 KG if an ideal balance between escape and
erosion holds.

POSSIBLE RESULT BY EXPEDITIONARY INSTRUMENTAL MEASURES (Dec2021):

Earths mass may or may not be
understood as a physical cosmological mass constant.

But proving it in *any
instrumental* detail seems close to mission impossible.

INSTRUMENTALLY viewed (*Quoting Sources*):
we don't know for sure yet.

Taking the direct net
atmospheric outflow of mass **9.66 T7** KG/y evenly spread out over the flat
equatorial Earth spheres surface (**5.11 T14** M²) (9.66 T7 KG/y)/(5.11
T14 M²) = **1.890410959 t7** KG/M²y resolved by an average mass balancing
INCOMING GRAIN OF SAND of mass 2.32 t6 KG means

(**1.890410959 t7** KG/M²y)/(**2.32 t6** KG/grain) = **1grain**/**12.27246377**M²y:

1 grain per **12.27**M² once
every year, or

1 grain per **1**M² once
every **12.27**year. *There is no such possible measuring instrumentation
on Earth, what we know (»GrandPas Diary»: one single 1mM³ grain of sand over
a decade). Trying to take it from space even increases the collecting
uncertainty.*

IF such an activity is applied
to the general TNED TimeLINE
chart incoming sand grains during the entire Earths Dnormal history
(20.82Gy) the amount of collected sand during the last 4.5Gy (*from first
water on Earth*) would have become *m* = 4.5Gy Χ 9.66 T7 KG/y = **4.347
T17** KG Sand.. With a mean (Quartz) density of D = 2 320 KG/M³, that sand
volume is V = *m*/D = **1.8737 T14** M³ rounded:

With 30% land and its (estimated) another 30% deserts 0.3²Χ5.11T14M² =
4.6 T13 M² Desert the average depth or height (*h*) of sand filling the
deserts ideally even up would be

*h* = **1.8737 T14** M³ /
4.6 T13 M² = 4.1 M (*type house high*) desert sand rounded. *No account
taken on the amount over the sea floors.*

It is indeed a reasonable quantity result only by view of the naked eye
from pictures over the world

and, as we know, impossible
to either reject or verify *by any instrumental measure relative* to the
suggested origin (SAND).

The RATE (ConBEAT
8.55 T8 KG/y ) of 1mSEA

exchange between atmosphere and Earth crust mineral integrated water

means that (TNED-physics: ideal Sun
energy with 100% hydrogen in complete burn to helium)

during the Sun's total lifetime ~ 120Gy,
the Earth crust will lose an amount of 1.026 T20 KG water

that is **7.3%** of 1mSEA (1.4 T21 KG = all oceans, land water and ice on
Earth: also in EARTH FACT SHEET NASA: Tota1 mass of hydrosphere: 1.4 Χ 10^{21}
KG). As this loss is filled in with water from the still
eroding/weathering lithosphere, the actual water loss is only appearing in the
crust. And as such ([7.3%/1mSEA]/20mSEA = 0.35%) only **0.35%** of the whole
Earth water bank (mH2O) is involved *until Day End of our Sun*. After that
Sun goes on vacation: battery out the rest of the journey will be ICE: no
more hydrogen escape: no light *not until the next K-cell expansion
history. But that is another novel not covered in this paper*.

KCHIP the reason why.

*Found
*(19Dec2021)

K-CELL EXPANSION HALTING PRINCIPLE

EXPANDING
MASS BODY DEVELOPMENT WITH UNIQUE PROPERTIES

*
In modern academy, that Body Principle is not even mentioned it has not even
a theory not one single application?*

** **

**At a given moment of time t: **

**Expansion rate is always highest at
the K-cell rim ( vt-graph below) **

** decreasing to zero at K center where
the enveloped mass m also is zero, mv-graph above.**

**
With K-cell expansion ** →**, an ideal
homogeneously inner K-cell expanding body **←
→** hence experiences a stronger velocity decrease OUT**→** than **←**IN as the
K-cell expansion continues to lose v-pace.**

**
So not really linear momentum p=mv is conserved for a type
K-cell expanding mass.**

** Rather:**

** » Linear momentum is favored towards
the inner for an expanding body containing inner expanding bodies».**

**
The K-cell decreasing expansion velocity as time approaches infinity,
favors more mvIN then mvOUT:**

**
The mvOUT loses pace with higher magnitude than mvIN.**

**THE REBELLIOUS CONCLUSION WOULD BE:**

** **

** **

Any (homogeneous) expanding
(exploding *a*) mass J containing successively inner expanding (exploding
±*v*) masses *j* is by physical gravitational principle
preordained to come to a general J-halt expansion followed by a contraction.
Proof: K-center←*+a+v > a+v*→K-outer.

** **

** **

** **

**In an ideal Galilean force field
same gravity tug everywhere the linear conservation statement holds.**

**In the actual K-cell inner expanding
bodies case it does not:**

** **

WHERE and WHEN the halt appears
depends on specific inner K-cell parameters: the pace with which the inner mass
density displacement takes form relative the actual rim expansion pace.

This
the simplest deduced basic K-cell expanding form

------------------------------------------------

*v*K = (4G**m**/*t*)^{1/3}/3
= (4G**m**/27)^{1/3}/*t* ^{1/3}

------------------------------------------------

= **7.2916204 T7** M/S = *v*K*rem* @*t*=336Gy (=*v*K
HaltFACTOR)

see K-cell AGE;

*continues
to expand forever with unlimited-towards-zero decreasing rim velocity unless a
halt factor KCHIP is subtracted.*

has
no inner expanding feature. It is only the ideal homogeneous expanding mass **m**=*m*K
that counts.

If an
inner expanding body feature is introduced says KCHIP a corresponding *v*-form would apparently take
form like

*v*END @*t*=KcellAGE = (4G*m*/27)^{1}^{/3}/*t*^{1/3} (**7.2916204 T7**
M/S)^(1) = **0**

*with
some type of a possible v-function as (for example, or other)*

*v* = (4G*m*/27)^{1}^{/3}/*t*^{1/3} (**7.2916204 T7** M/S)^([336Gy·yS=**1.060650936 T20** S]/*t*)

That
so because **there is no actual change in the m**-part. The only (KCHE) way
to halt the basic non-inner body expanding *v*K expansion then would be in
adding a (*time function of a*) subtracting term:

*slow
beginning on high v and small volume, more to the end with lower v and big
volume: no direct linear function*.

EFFECT
OF MASS LOSSES FROM HEAT AND LIGHT

With
a *m*VIZ¦0.7% mass loss from heat and light during the K-cell expanding
period, the basic *v*K value @*t*=336Gy reduces by [0.7%(*m*K)/355
= 8.202816901 T48 KG]

**m** = *m*K
0.7%(*m*K)/355 = *m*K(1 0.7%/355) = 4.16 T53 KG(0.999980281) ;

*v*DIFF = 72916203.626205** **M/S [(4G**m**/27)^{1/3}/*t*
^{1/3} = 72915724.3616226 M/S]

=
479.2645823807 M/S

MORE
BY DETAIL:

K-CELL EXPANSION CONTRACTION TNED BUDGET:

** **

**4.160000000
T53** KG ............. *m*K *comparing reference value*:
total Universe/K-cell mass

1.171830986
T51 KG ............. *m*K/355 = *m*VIZ:
*thermonuclear energy active universes mass*

**4.148281690
T53** KG ............. *m*REM = *m*K*m*K/355 =
REMAINING INTACT K-cell mass: never affected

**8.202816901
T48** KG ............. *m*L = 0.7%*m*K/355: *thermonuclear
hf/c²=m loss during* 336Gy

*neutron
refilled from surrounding neutron dormant c0-body during the contraction phase:*

*m*L/*m*K .................................... = 0.001971830986%

*m*L/*m*REM .............................. = 0.001977401130%

*m*L is spread out evenly (linearly)
decreasing over the entire lifetime of the electromagnetically active K-cell [336Gy] by mass losses when stars transfer mass to light and
heat (E=*hf=mc²*).

*m*K: The inner fragmenting expanded *m*K
mass is continuously pushed (KCHIP)
towards the K-cell center also in further favor for the higher dynamical
effect towards the inner:

** **

**GRB generation.
Fast action in, slow out. **

** That works
because the gravitational potential (****Lights gravitational dependency****: G m/r) governing the local K-cell divergence (**

MEANING:

One
way or another, all *m*K mass experiences a drawback into the universal
gravitation K-cell center;

FIRST through the inner bodies fragmenting
expansion as above period 0-16.3Gy when *t***Pmax** is reached, and
after which point of time no more fragmenting expansion takes place;

SECOND through the described established
thermonuclear radiation pressure generated by all light sources from start to
end continuously and (very) slowly pushing the *m*REM debris

mREM
= *m*K[1 1/355] ( *m*L)

preferentially
towards the K center

until all star light has vanished (336Gy, K-cell AGE).

That point of time (336Gy) would mark the (most
closely related) final stop of the K-cell expansion.

Removing
the *m*L = 8.202816901 T48 KG part from *m*K=**m** in

------------------------------------------------

*v*K = (4G**m**/27)/*t*^{1/3}

------------------------------------------------

at

*v*K(336Gy) .... = 72
916 203.626205 M/S leaves a corresponding smaller

*v*K(336Gy) .... = 72
915 724.3616226 M/S with a difference of

*v*DIFF ........... =
479.2645823807 M/S.

The (break contributing) influence from the mass loss *m*L is
apparently negligible.

*Usiong
the KcellAGE
preference marker*

KCHIP related from the very start

BEGINNING
DIRECTLY FROM K-CELL EXPANSION THE MOMENT OF DETONATION

There
is a possible (preferential) way to »solve all
K-cell inner hopelessly difficult impossible density distribution enigmas for
the entire universal history of evolution» by this simple mathematical
approach:

We
CAN include them all in THE *mathematical-physical* DETONATING MOMENT:

The KCHIP has already pointed out the K-cell halting reason: inner
fragmenting/expanding J-bodies K-center ← →:

The gravity factor on the IN is always
greater than that on the OUT:

J-body linear momentum *p=mv* ideal
conservation (*as in a Galilean force field*) does not hold in an
expanding mother body where its partial child masses expand themselves.

Expansion SPEED is always favored as
directed to K-center → ←:

Sooner or later the K-cell inner J-body expansion-fragmenting
general expansion ceases, stops and begins a returning contraction.

TAKING
THE *v*HALT FACTOR DIRECTLY FROM START

In
the vESCdiv3
deduction the K-cell general basic (no inner fragmenting) velocity form (*v*K)

------------------------------------------------

*vK* =
(4G**m**/*t*)^{1/3}/3 = (4G**m**/27)^{1/3}/*t*^{1/3}

------------------------------------------------

it is
only 1/3 of the more simple STATIC escape velocity form

*v*E = √ 2G**m**/*r*

= 3*v*K

as
derived directly from the equivalence between kinetic energy (E=F*r*) and
its gravitational counterpart E = M*v*²/2 = F*r* = G*m*M/*r*
with *v*² = 2G*m/r*.

As
our K-cell *v*END-factor (*v*HALT) is defined by a definitely deduced KcellAGE preference marker

*v*END @*t*=KcellAGE = (4G*m*/27)^{1}^{/3}/*t*^{1/3} *v*HALT = **0**

*v*HALT = **7.2916204 T7** M/S

the
entire related K-cell velocity can be traced back to THAT FIRST J-body DIAMETER
(Ψ) location (R*r*=[*r*+Ψ]*r*) in the K-cell WHERE

*v*HALT = (√ 2G**m**)(1/√*r *1/√R)/3 = **7.2916204 T7** M/S ;

**3***v*HALT/(√ 2G**m**) = 1/√*r *1/√R

√R = 1/[1/√*r ***3***v*HALT/(√ 2G**m**)]

R = 1/[1/√*r ***3***v*HALT/(√ 2G**m**)]² ;

Ψ =
R *r*

AT *t*OFFSET
*just before the K-cell contraction ends with contact between all the
maximum packed neutrons close to the actual *K-cell detonation

*t*OFFSET = √ 3/2πGD*max*
= 0.000198226014336 S

=
**1.98226014336 t4** S

its
smallest D*max* radius (CONTRACTIVE *r*) is calculated from (KcellAGE here simplified as 336Gy *from previous basic paper
work, a reference value*)

*r* = (3**m**/4πD)^{1/3}
= (3**m**/4π[3/2πG*t*²])^{1/3}

= (G**m**/2)^{1/3}*t*^{2/3}

= **8.169023690 T11** M

Then
(R = **816902412390.8** M = **8.169024123908 T11** M)

←Ψ→
= R *r*

= 43 361.6671142578 M

~ **43** KM

WHEN
the K-cell detonates and gives its first expansion movement over THAT Ψ, »its
done».

Irrevocably doomed to return (KCHIP).

It does not matter when, how or what
type of specific density distributions will occur inside the rest of the K-cell
expansion history: its fate to halt and begin to contract is (KCHIP) decided the
moment it begins to expand.

That
was what we amateurs didnt grasp from the start.

HOME. It is a symphony
in Heaven. Martha, Im home again.

BUT:

Is
not the physical/dynamical form of a possible inner K-cell related variation
conflicted IF, as below, a sudden not smooth brake appears in the *v*K-form?

And
what about the corresponding (smoothly ceasing) variations in density (D)

and
radius (*r*)?

*v*HALT = *v*END = *the point of time (**KcellAGE) beyond which no more expansion reducing pace is
available by active force inside the K-cell universe.*

** **

**The vEND factor (***v*END @*t*=KcellAGE
= (4G*m*/27)^{1}^{/3}/*t*^{1/3} *v*HALT = **0 : ***v*HALT
= **7.2916204 T7** M/S**) forces the basic vK-form to be pushed vertically down
to the y=zero x axis line (x-axis pushed upwards). The same operation but along
the x-axis accounts for the tOFFSET factor **

**(***t*OFFSET = √ 3/2πGD*max* =
0.000198226014336 S **) because the basic inverted t-function has no own point
where it intersects the y-axis. So:**

** The K-cell HALT situation from the
basic v-equation introduces a TIP point: Expansion »suddenly»
overturns in contraction:**

**
A moment of »flat horizontal standstill» does not exist. Not for the
K-cell velocity, radius or density. All breakpoints have a tip. Why is that?**

** Is it because the author has less
mathematical insight, and therefore choses only the most simple basic equations
to get rid of bad critique?**

** The reader might be much smarter
than the author, and is therefore left to a private own decision on that issue.**

** The TNED related reason is much more
simple: **

**
There are two slightly different sides of the equations describing
lights gravitational dependency on account of the gravitational potential.**

** **

No.
Not at all says TNED related mathematical gravitational physics. All
parameters cooperate in a unifying total explaining whole.

How can that be?

Static-Expansive-Contractive, SEC:

COMPILED EXPRESSIONS

**Compare
basic deducing relations in** PRIMARYvFORM:

EarthMass2021IAU.ods Tabell3 ¦ CoRoA47 tested, checked and rechecked over all **t**:
22Dec2021

EXPANSIVE-CONTRACTIVE
ΦK-CELL *covers all cases*:

FROM *c/c*_{0}=1
DownTO ∞ (CHEOPS
HYPERBOLIC SOLUTIONS)

**m** = *m*K
KG ; D = 3/2πG*t*² KG/M³ ; *r*
= (3**m**/4πD)^{1/3} M ;

**F** = *w*²/**2***c*_{0}²
= [(G** m**/

**Φ** = INT([1 (|[**F**
1/**2**]| [**F** 1/**2**])]) ; **num**
0¦1

*c/c*_{0} = (1/2)(1 + [2**Φ**
+ 1]√| 1 **2F **|) ; **num: |** 1 *w*²/*c*_{0}²
**|**

*m* = (*r*/G)*c*_{0}²(1 [2**Φ** + 1][12*c/c*_{0}]²) ;
note Expansive-Contractive versus STATIC:

=

**F** = *w*²/*c*_{0}² =
[(G** m**/

**Φ** = [ ( 1 **F **) / | 1 **F **| ] ; **num =:**
IF F<1 THEN**Φ=1**ELSE**1 =** ±1

*c/c*_{0} = (1/2)(1 **Φ**√|1 **F**|) ; **num: |***w*²/*c*_{0}²
1**|**

*m* = (*r*/G)*c*_{0}²(1 + [**Φ**][12*c/c*_{0}]²) ;
note Expansive-Contractive versus STATIC:

STATIC
ΦK-CELL *covers all cases*:

**m** = *m*K
KG ; D = 3/2πG*t*² KG/M³ ; *r*
= (3**m**/4πD)^{1/3} M ;

**F** = *w*/*c*_{0} =
√ [(G** m**/

**Φ** = INT([1 (|[**F**
1/**2**]| [**F** 1/**2**])]/2) ; **num**
0¦1

*c/c*_{0} = (1/2)(1 + [2**Φ**
+ 1]√| 1 **(2F)²**|) ; **num: |** 1 **4***w*²/*c*_{0}²
**|**

*m* = (*r*/**4**G)*c*_{0}²(1 [2**Φ** + 1][12*c/c*_{0}]²) ;
note SEC

*The
TIP property IS defines the dynamic central foundation*

PROMINENT
AND DRAMATIC CHANGES IN DYNAMICS appear at the TIP between

**contraction-expansion
**

*triggering
detonation by a corresponding initializing »gravitational implosion»*

FROM
**|***w*²/*c*0² 1**| **TO** |4***w*²/*c*0² 1**|**** **BackTO **|***w*²/*c*0²
1**|**

GRAVITATION *convergence* PRINCIPLE (Physics 7 Principles)

*Equal
for all matter, cannot be shielded from; independent of time ***not
represented in modern academy 1800+**

DIVERGENCE *light electricity* PRINCIPLE (Physics 7 Principles)

*Different
for all matter, Can be shielded from; Dependent of time ***well
represented in modern academy 1800+**

and

**expansion-contraction**

*enhancing
the turning over moment by a corresponding »gravitational implosion»*.

FROM
**|***w*²/*c*0² 1**| **TO** |4***w*²/*c*0² 1**|**** **BackTO **|***w*²/*c*0²
1**|**

See
the K-cell DETONATION unless already familiar. These (very) simple natural
principles rule the whole machinery.

WITHOUT
DEFINITE OPPOSITE (MIRROR) TANGENTIAL BREAKS

BETWEEN
THE TWO DIFFERENT STATES OF PHYSICS, NO HERE KNOWN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS EXISTS
IN EXPLAINING THE K-CELL BEHAVIOR.

EarthMass2021IAU.ods Tabell3 ¦ CoRoA47 has been used to check and crosscheck basic K-cell
values in total and in specific by inner limited regions on the given set of
deduced CHEOPS HYPERBOLIC SOLUTIONS equations.

*v*Escape/3=*v*K