EARTH MASS  ¦ UNIVERSUMS HISTORIA | a production 2021XII10 | Senast uppdaterade version: 2023-01-26 · Universums Historia

 

innehåll content denna sida · webbSÖK äMNESORD på denna sida Ctrl+F · sök ämnesord överallt i  SAKREGISTER  ·  förteckning  alla webbsidor

 

 

IRTeP —  IMPACT REFERENCE, THE PROOOF¦ CheopsATLASportal ¦ CHEOPS REKTANGEL — bd=h² ¦ CHEOPS PYRAMID — Flinders Petrie 1883 ¦ mJ ¦ SyreFiltret

 

UniverseSAND ¦ TGATE  ¦ ITeM  ¦ SIU  ¦ AndTER ¦ SandTRAVEL ¦ TheTOTALcount ¦ SHOW ME A SHORT DENSE OVERVIEW  ¦ EarthMassFindCON ¦ 11% ¦ SUM 

 

 THE ANDROMEDA TEST AND The mass of the Earth EARTH POINT and the cosmological gravitational constant G (Gtest) and NATURE

 

 

 

 

See the constants explained in Gtest. Four of them are not included in present known established science. See description in EarthRADalt. G = 6.67 t11 JM/(KG)². See TEST.

 

NATURE UNCOVERS AN ATOMIC PRECISION SYSTEM OF EARTH'S MASS-EQUALITY WITH EARTH’S SURFACE ISOTOPIC DISTRIBUTION AND COMPOSITION.

WHAT WE KNOW: such a communicating equality system would be impossible to uncover — find — unless so already set up by nature herself from the same order as that at work in the periodic system: the nature of biological structure for building: life. Flowers. Fully and perfectly orchestrated purposefulness: Chance=Random=0. Perfect structure (as in crystals: our WOMAN: »our mother of the universe». Perfect assembly: »I’ll pay to see you WALK»).

———————————————

jH2O ¦ BioGAS ¦ BioEK1-10 ¦ TheTEN ¦ AR123 ¦ CWON ¦ CAP ¦ MATIK — NEUTRON NUCLEAR PRIMARY BIOCHEMICAL MATRICES¦ THE PERIODIC SYSTEM ¦ Inner distribution of elements

 

 

— Earth’s mass cannot be measured in any precise or exact way — even if implied a constant with ± 0 atmospheric mass flow in-out. Changes on the surface (Moon tidals), in the crust (continental drift and land elevation) and the inner parts attest a continuous change of references that is setting up a definite limit for (consistent stable time) measures (1 tidal ocean/tidal mass: 1.4 T21 KG or roughly 0.023% of the Earth’s mass).

 

 

THERE ARE ADDITIONAL Earth Mass exact EQUALITIES for each one of the combining/communicating isotopic constituents — see jH2OCHART for overview — such as

mJ = (C12rem/2628)(1460BioEK3[1475BioEK1–1460])(S/c)² + 2cT23 = 1.68 T19/3t6 + 3.75T23 = 5.975 T24 KG — 2628 = 1460·3²/(2+3) periodic system constants 2_6_..

THE SUBJECT IS PERFECTLY ABSENT IN MODERN CORRIDORS AND QUARTERS: not even by far such cosmological theories in mathematics exist therein.

Resonant Structures. Basic primary biochemical matrices — CAP. No random. No chance. No mother god loving way.

 

 

•   Exact Earth mass. Apparently.

•   Exact atomic structure. Connecting status.

•   Exact nuclear physics. Gravitation and electricity.

•   EARTH MASS CAN IN NO EXACT WAY BE PRECISELY MEASURED — even if implied a constant with ± 0 atmospheric mass flow in-out. REASON: Changes on the surface (Moon tidals), in the crust (continental drift and land elevation) and the inner parts attest a continuous change of references that is setting up a definite TIME MEASURING limit for consistent measures (1 tidal ocean/tidal mass: 1.4 T21 KG or roughly 0.023% of the Earth’s mass). So: how is it?

•   Exact balance (cMARG ¦ BEKS) — all for LIFE — apparently provable by mathematical precise relations between isotopic quantities.

Water and plants: photosynthesis agents Leaf&Needle — during 3Gy of undisturbed natural evolution: »a temple of knowledge».

— 100% preserved biosurface — up to 1800 when industrial deforestation breaks the order: >30% removed to 2000. Alarm.

 

STATE attacks its own internationally asseverated societal contract  ” .. of the greatest importance .. ” — Marker :  what 30% can you spare? Do share greatest.

PERFECT ASSEMBLY. No flaws. No errors. What built life: sun energy transfer agents. Perfect beauty .. until ..

 

COMPARE MEASURING THE PRESENT ACTUAL MASS OF OUR SUN — BY KNOWING A PRESENT ANOMALISTIC PERIOD 365.2596425d USING THE KEPLER CONNECTION

mS = (2π/t)2R3/G WITH THE PRESENT KNOWN R=1AU=1.4959787 T11 M AND G=6.67 t11 JM/(KG)², WE by principle ONLY NEED ONE REVOLUTION PERIOD FOR THE t PARAMETER: BECAUSE THE EARTH-MOON SYSTEM ELLIPTIC ORBIT AROUND THE SUN anyway IS AFFECTED THE LEAST OF OTHER SURROUNDING MASSES[‡]. THEN A MOST PRECISE KEPLER CALCULATION IS POSSIBLE FOR FINDING THE — NEAREST MOST PRECISE — MASS OF OUR SUN (1.989661830 T30 KG: Wikipedia: 1.9885 T30 KG: 99.942%). BUT THIS RESULT MUST BE attested and so  VERIFIED BY ANOTHER (ORBITAL INDEPENDENT) MEASURE: THE SUN’S PHOTOMETRIC EFFECT (IAU VALUE: 3.8275 ± 0.0014 T26 W). A GENERAL TNED PHYSICS COSMOLOGICAL CALCULATING TEST, INCLUDING ALL COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETERS, WAS PERFORMED (Oct2018) FOR SUCH AN IAU TEST. See ResTAB. RESULT: THE TNED TEST ARRIVED DIRECTLY AT THE IAU FIGURE ON 3.827500021 WITH G = 6.67 — @3.827500000 WITH G = 6.67000002. THE RESULT ATTESTS AND CERTIFIES THE SOLUTION AND CHOICE OF CONSTANTS: THE INSTRUMENTAL EPOCH’S STANDARD VALUES DID PASS THE TEST — NOT THE PRESENT COMPUTER EPOCH STANDARD.

————————————

WIKIPEDIA on Gravitational Constant mentions the Earth-Moon system and its orbit around the Sun, where the text says 2Dec2021 ”.. the measured quantities contain corrections from the perturbations from other bodies in the solar system and from general relativity.”. What type of issue the ”general relativity” aspect is in concern of is not further mentioned. NASA — Jet propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology — Solar System Dynamics — gives some additional information on the moving objects in the solar system. The text informs on a ”coordinate timescale .. is the independent variable in the numerically integrated  second order relativistic differential equations of motion”. We should NOTE that ingredient in general modern academic ideas of our solar system content. In TNED it has no representation. Compare: The Perihelion Rotations. As far from Einstein’s relativity as far can come — on same exact end math.

 

Purpose:

purposefulness — perfect assembly

NATURE UNCOVERS HARMONICS — a tremendously well constructed purposefulness

The electron masses of an atom in a solid cooperate in preserving the atom’s neutral state. The neutral state takes no input energy to exist.

The electron masses also cooperate over neighboring borders to form precise crystalline structures over vast space volumes with high precision symmetry and resistance against stress. In building such a system of harmonics, all components give individual contributions. But the system in total will not be uncovered, understood or explained by only looking at the individual’s contribution.

•   A full understanding of the entire building will arrive only after appropriate study in all of the total common harmonically preserved structural connections.

 

NATURE SHOWS SUCH TYPE OF PURPOSEFULNESS — in the middle of Her stunning beauty — AND She takes my breath away Completely. I am in a simple manner HOME inside of Her. No chance. No Random.

 

— So the PRINCIPLE of NATURAL DISCOVERY — »the full order of knowledge» — is already drafted on such resembling atomic foundations: The whole is understood ONLY through and by co-working individual contributors forming a harmonic foundation (a symphony).

 

 

TimeLINE ¦ Sun’s Photometric Effect IAUtest

THE QUEST OF A FIX EARTH MASS QUANTITY

— How did it come?

 

———————————————

CAP ¦ Primary distribution of elements inside Earth ¦ DIAsquare ¦ BaseCHART ¦ CELESTIAL bodies building time — from Dmax to Dnormal¦ Modern academy: ”water from the outer”

 

 

Earth:

 

———————————————

jH2O ¦

Basic reason: Modern academy never had a solid atomic nucleus and its universe to take the stand FROM: the neutron: Planck constant h=mcr: The Planck Ring. Instead, a different, more academic kind of a universe was invented by academic consensus. Only leading to a dead end wall of contradictions — demanding magical and mystical entities to be accepted.

Fig.1:

 

Modern academy limited its own invented idea of our universe by — frankly — postulating limitations to our own understanding, proclaiming ”a new kind of logic”: the theory of relativity. In TNED it is PLANCK EQUIVALENTS — giving the classical physics detailed explanation to every single part and piece of the atomic universe — or not at all. See Fig.1 above: light’s gravitational dependency — with the central mathematical generator collected for comparison; The Einstein original, the complementary Schwarzchild expression, and the all theories enveloping TNED deduced Cheops Rectangle mathematics solution (here only the static part, there is also an additional dynamics part for expansion-contraction): the natural constant c0 is preserved independent of gravitation: atomic nucleus’ deduction as the fundamental form of gravitation.

 

EarthPoint: EARTH

Wikipedia source found to the figure 5.9722[‡] Found21Nov2021@search5.9722

Present Wikipedia specifications (Nov2021) refer a value

5.9722 ± 0.0006 T24 KG as a new established value for the mass of the Earth.

But Wikipedia, and others, just give references to sources themselves also just reporting the actual number. No explanation or reference seems to exist in these sources telling how or from where the value as such has come. Recently (21Nov2021) an explaining source was fond in

ourplnt.com/mass-earth-neutrinos/

OUR PLANET — THE MASS OF EARTH: SCIENTISTS USED NEUTRINOS TO MEASURE

•   But THAT — the explaining part of the figure 5.972.. — was Not the hot spot of the story:

 

FIRST:

”Using this method, the researchers calculated the mass of Earth (M⊕) between 5.7×1024 kg and 7.6×1024 kg.”;

”According to the most precise gravitational measurement, the Earth’s mass is M⊕=(5.9722±0.0006)x1024 kg”;

”Researchers say “clearly, albeit within large uncertainties, both results are in very good agreement.” ”;

SECOND — the actual hot spot:

”While scanning the interior of Earth using neutrinos, a team of scientists from Spain also used these subatomic particles to measure the mass of Earth. Their result is in agreement with the current best estimate, which was measured using the value of the gravitational constant (G)”;

”They published their findings in a study titled “Neutrino tomography of Earth” on Nature Physics.”.

 

G, it was. Depending on the G-value — OldG6.67 or newG6.6743 significants — we arrive at respectively 5.975 or 5.972 — from a simple expedition EarthMassFINDmethod of averaging Earths equator-polar ellipsoid in finding a »best fit»: A resulting ideal sphere to hang the mass on — applying the industrial standard Earth surface (45°N/S) gravity value g = 9.80665 M/S². Case closed.

•   It isn’t the mass, then. It is the G — with a bottom line:

•   Neutrino measures (as reported in the source, and its specified ”between 5.7×1024 kg and 7.6×1024 kg”) are (at present) no more accurate than earlier estimates and measures. We study that by detail below.

 

The point:

25Nov2021 — TNED-physics

EARTH MASS

Results from the general cosmological Oct2018IAU-test with the following (2020+) CAP-CWON-AR123 results DO question the present established INTERPRETIVE end results from reading the (accurate in themselves unquestionable) instrumental measures in concern of  the TNED — to be noted: bio-cosmological: noMACphysics — results:

 

•   the gravitational constant (G: IAU-test by significants says):

•   G: ..............  6.67000002) [same as HOP1967oldG] and

•   the mass of our Earth (mJ: CAP-CWON-AR123 by significants says:

•   mJ: ............   5.97500000) [the VNS1967 value].

 

PRESENTLY CLAIMED 2021 MODERN VALUES (Wikipedia Nov2021 has the articles and figures; Gravitational constant, Earth mass):

 

•   G: ..............  6.6743 ± 0.0015: — passes not the IAU test, see ResTAB — and too: far from:

•   mJ: ............   5.9722 ± 0.0006: — destroys — shreds — the BioEK1-10 CAP-CWON-AR123 results:

— including parts of already established quantitative specifications such as 1mSEA = 1.4 T21 KG

(from NASA and others; Wikipedia, Water: 1.386 ; BKLXII1928sp464: 1.37 ).

 

TNED-physics not only suggests but too aims at proving in detail a general explanation for these (grave) differences

(Modern Academy Relativity Theory versus TNED physics Planck Equivalents) of type:

•   »corrupted end results» due to a GENERALLY BAD — irrational — COSMOLOGICAL THEORY:

— faulty incorporated non physical parametric theoretical parts — more invented by academic consensus than deduced.

———————————————

jH2O ¦ IRTeP ¦ CAP ¦ BioEK1-10 ¦ TheTEN ¦ AR123 ¦ CWON¦ CWONsum ¦ PrimDATA ¦ Oct2018IAUtest 

 

Our SUN stands in the middle of this expedition: the photometric effect and its instrumental measure (the IAU value attested by TNED). It is the irrevocable fact. And so the rest SHOULD apply as well. Everything else would indeed be strange.

 

 

Gtest: EarthPOINT

Cheops Atlas Series Present

PRESENTING THE RESULTS IN ENGLISH FROM THE ORIGINAL PRODUCTION (Oct2020-Nov2021) IN SWEDISH

HOW THE CHEOPS RECTANGLE DID CONNECT EARTH MASS 5.975 AND THE »old school» UNIVERSAL GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANT G = 6.67:

— It was a general cosmological TNED test on the IAU photometric effect — as measured from our sun: 3.8275000 ± 0.0014 T26 W

 

 

= 6.670000000 t11 JM/(KG)2  ¦  

This value was attested in the Oct2018 IAU Sun Photometric Effect 3.8275 ± 0.0014 T26 W General Cosmological TNED TEST ResTAB matching on 3.827500021

through an 365.2596425d [ENCARTA 99 ¦ Wikipedia 360 Anomalistic orbit period] anomalistic Kepler Third calculated @present Sun mass 1.989661830 T30 KG

with Earth-Moon mean elliptic major axis [BA1978s161sp2: Cambridge International Astronomy] 2AU: 1AU = 1.495 978 70 T11 M.

 

r0c ......   1.544177741 T26 M:  r0c is the TNED calculated K-cell/universe’s expansion radius on its maximum power time point (T0=16.3Gy. see K-cell heat physics chart in MathLISTiau)

u .........   1.66033 t27 KG, part of/in instrumental epoch standard constant values found in library encyclopedic literature [here denoted IES — 1960-1999]: atomic mass unit C12/12

h .........   6.62559 t34 JS, IES Planck constant

nU.......   1.0086652, neutron [ n ] mass in u [Dalton] units [U] — in TNED occasionally denoted ”mn”

c0 .......   2.99792458 T8 M/S, top speed light propagation value [ divergence ] in vacuum; gravitational frequency and wavelength proportionality give same value independent of space region

18 ......    NEUTRON SQUARE ATOMIC electron MASS SCALE INDEX — see atomic, not nuclear, mass defects define experimentally measured atomic masses in TNED physics. See THE NEUTRON.

mSbegin ...........   1.99272242808046 T30 KG, Sun mass from day one — 20.805Ga — the TNED physics’ deduced K-cell [UNIVERSE] heat physics with our Sun as a NORM star [SUNeq123].

m0cK ...............   4.16143338129800 T53 KG, K-cell mass: TNED calculated mass of the cosmic central electromagnetic active K-cell [our UNIVERSE] in result from the Oct2018IAU test, as the above.

m0cK ...............   4.16143250743896 T53 KG, K-cell mass: TNED derived: 36[mSbegin]^3/[ Dmax^2 · 2nU^6 · pi^5 ]; Dmax in G-rank: Dmax = (nUu)^4·(c0/h)^3/4 = 1.821772972866 T17 KG/M³.

 

EarthRadius: Gtest

Earth radius and local gravity constant (the g) can be measued with relatively simple methods depending on level of ttechnology — but not mass or G or D

FROM »FRED FLINSTONE» SCRATCH — depending on level of technology

EARTH RADIUS — IN TWO different SIMILAR WAYS

 

EARTH Radius BY

surface distance and angle

 

Concurrent (equatorial) observations at different locations — same time data. Known distance (s) between two angle comparing locations.

 

EarthRADalt: RADIUS

EARTH Radius BY

by altitude and angle

 

 

Time independent (equatorial) observations — preferentially with sea level preferences (Moon tide effects add small variations). Known altitude and angle.

 G = w² r/ m2 — 360° TIME INDEPENDENT centrifugal equilibrium condition:

•   BECAUSE differences in body shape and inner — and surface [crust] tidal — changes and fluctuations, no DIRECT exact instrumental G measure is physically possible: there are no ideally 2 isolated masses.

•   The only physical way to extract »the exact G value» is through an entire cosmological calculating process where all its significant properties are exposed to the G-factor — if at all possible.

— BECAUSE ONCE FOUND — IF AT ALL — IN SUCH A COMPREHENSIVE OUTLOOK, NOTING CAN UNDO IT: all ”other” excluded. So: it is a question of Whether the calculus DID succeed or not:

— Did we miss any —  or maybe somone yields »— The Quest is irrational» — please share ..?

 

AS CERTIFIED IN RESULT BY THE [Oct2018 IAU test] IAU MEASURED SUN PHOTOMETRIC EFFECT  3.8275 ± 0.0014 T26 W — as attested on the instrumental epoch standard values only, see ResTAB:

G = 6.67 t11 JM/[KG]² — featuring a »the ideal provable cosmic biotopical exact value» — to be refuted by anyone capable of giving the mathematical and physical argument. Searched for, non yet found.

•   NOT  in explicit INCLUDED IN MODERN ACADEMY 1800+:   r0c  18   mSbegin   m0cK  [there is a corresponding mass value, but no present academic theory connects to TNED cosmology].

Because the TNED deduced Neutron mass density Dmax = (nUn)4(c0/h)3/4 the G-rank can be written alternatively (r0c/mSBEGIN3)Dmax(u4)(h–3)(nU)10c0516π5/18.

———————————————

PREFIXxSIN ¦

 

EarthRAD: ALT

PRESENT (2021) VALUES (»in public most used») — no (biotopical) exact values are known in this production

 

6.378 000 000 T6 M .............   Earth equator radius (Req)

6.375 638 828 T6 M .............   Earth pole radius (Req/Rpol = 1.0034)

———————————————————————————————————

Req, Req/Rpol = 1.0034: BA1978s176Tabell10.1 Cambridge International Astronomy

 

EarthGravity:

SIMPLE MEASURES — WITH FAIRLY GOOD RESULTS

— depending on level of technology (stop-watch, fine sewing thread, metal washer, common industrial mM graded meter tape)

EARTH SURFACE GRAVITY — 9.80665 M/S² 45°N/S

The 9.80665 figure is from TenSMIT2003 “the World Meteorological Organization value used for standard gravity at 45° latitude”: we test our local kitchen;

 

 

A stop-watch, a fine sewing thread, a metal washer, and a common industrial mM graded meter tape. Back in time impossible precision tools that we today take for granted: simple experimentation in physics — with good results. The oblateness in the figure above, featuring our Earth, is strongly exaggerated for clarity.

— The CONICAL PENDULUM is originally formed by a circulating mass hung from a suspension by a thin wire. With a sufficiently small rotation circle radius (r) the conical becomes — »for very small angles» — a practical conventional to and fro swinging pendulum, as deduced above. Knowing the suspended length (L) and the swinging period (t)  0-1-2 — taken by many counts then averaged — the local gravity constant (a) shows up as a = L(2π/t)². Our kitchen example gave 9.8169309 M/S² at latitude 60°N.

•   By using a thin hollow washer air friction is minimized — and too gives a precision readout from the vertically hung meter tape: horizontal washer’s g-line.

———————————————

9.80665 — Earth surface gravity constant [ g ]: TenSMIT2003 ”the World Meteorological Organization value used for standard gravity at 45° latitude” ¦

 

 

EarthMassFIND:

Averaging the given 1800-1900s Req Rpol, adopting the industrial standard g value of 9.80665 M/S², rounding by three decimals, and

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

reaching a quantity of Earth mass from old (1960-1999) and new (2000+) G values — whichever you prefer

FINDING THE MASS OF THE EARTH

THREE significant DECIMALS: TwoStepMean (Equator is closest):

ROUND[([INT(1000m(Req)/T24) + INT(1000m(Rpol)/T24)]/2 + INT(1000m(Req)/T24))/2]×T24

= mEARTHaveraged closest to Equator Radius

 

Taking the (1978 Cambridge International Astronomy) 1900s specified Earth pole and equator radius figures

— adopting g = 9.80665 M/S² (meanLAT45°) gives the following result:

EMFmethod: FIND

There are several possible ways to perform some result comparing calculations — by several ways to test the (average) results, depending on strategy.

Here we adopt the most simple:

 

•   Earth’s equator (Req) and pole (Rpol) radius expose an ellipsoid

— not very far from an ideal sphere — but enough so to reflect some significant differences.

•   We use the most simple elliptic connections to calculate/average mean (spherical) radii by solving the ellipse’s d-length.

•   We use the d-length result as a new ideal spherical radius for simulating or testing a (»best fit») gravitational Earth Sphere:

— actual mass (m) arrives from an ideal spherical radius (R), and an additional average density (D). No big deal. Just simple (3 decimal) numbers.

 

Finding the mass of the Earth — through simple average calculations from (generally) known premises.

———————————————

PREFIXxSIN ¦

• We use the specified (Cambridge International Astronomy) figures on Earth's equatorial (Re or Req) and polar (Rp or Rpol) radii:

BA1978s173 Tabell 10.1 ¦ Re = 6.378 T6 M

0.0034 = (Re — Rp)/Rp ¦ = Re/Rp — 1; Re/Rp = 1.0034, = 1/E = R/r ; E = r/R = 1/1.0034 ;

• These given we average in two steps — summarized as [(Re+Rp)/2 + Re]/2 where

R1 = (Re+Rp)/2 = d1 and

R2 = [(Re+Rp)/2 + Re]/2 =d2

• Each of these will feature an ideal spherical radius. It connects the basic Gm = aR² where we will use the standard industrial

a = g = 9.80665 M/S² (TenSMIT2003 “the World Meteorological Organization value used for standard gravity at 45° latitude”)

• Our calculations then arrive at

m0(Re) ........ = a(Re)²/G

m1(R1) ........ = a([(Re+Rp)/2])²/G

m2(R2) ........ = a([(Re+Rp)/2 + Re]/2)²/G .

• We limit the end m-results to three decimals — applying standard mathematical calculus INTEGER and ROUND functions — on the same average type as in handling the R-values, giving (extract below from the OldG6.67 candidate illustrates the detailed course)

 

 

m(R) ........... = [(m0 + m1)/2 + m0]/2

• The resulting d(R) values are treated as elliptic d:s, which we convert to corresponding (projected) C° values, giving

C1° ............... = acos (1/e)√1 – (d1/Re) = 45.0243093833° ¦ PREFIXxSIN

C2° ............... = acos (1/e)√1 – (d2/Re) = 30.0210480786° ¦ PREFIXxSIN

— These C-angles will correspond to the ideal (end) Earth sphere and its ideal circular form.

 

EMFresults: Method  ¦ FIND

OUR RESULTS — with OldG6.67 and newG6.6743:

 

 

Comprised result in details. Two different end results appear from the two different G value sources: OldG6.6700, as quoted above, and newG6.6743 (present 2021 established science: value from Wikipedia Nov2021). The end result in Earth mass is respectively mJ = 5.9750 T24 KG and nJ = 5.9720 T24 KG. In specific, both solutions, the second and final averaged C-angle is close to or equal The 30°N/S latitude — where the first (known 3+) human civilizations appear: The Nile (Egypt), Euphrates and Tigris (Mesopotamia), Indus (Harappa and Mohenjo Daro), Yellow River (China). Apparently this latitude also connects to prominent geological/topological sites: highland mountains with large river systems: a natural place for humans to evolve on their specific culture.

 

———————————————

PREFIXxSIN ¦

mJ ... = 5.9750 T24 KG MASS OF THE EARTH, old candidate: same as the CAP/CWON Earth mass

nJ .... = 5.9720 T24 KG MASS OF THE EARTH, new candidate (Nov2021Wikipedia: 5.9722 ± 0.0006 T24 KG)

BOTH RESULTS THROUGH THE SAME MATHEMATICAL PROCEDURE — only difference is OldG6.67 and newG6.6743.

— In some way, our (former encyclopedic) VNS1967 reference 5.975 T24 KG for Earth’s mass is justified by this simple average and rounding exercise.

 

EMFdensity: Results ¦ Method  ¦ FIND

DENSITY DETAILS — D = 3a/4πGR

a:

Unless an ideal surface solid shaped sphere, D will be physically impossible to measure in any exact nature.

— That also (then) accounts for R — given a fix G.

•   Specifications of Earth density (D) will depend on idealized spherical or other morphological aspects. no exact measure;

varies with form — same mass.

 

The problem is identical on the basic form Gm = aR²: Even AS we know a Gm, the a and R fails: We are forced to TAKE on AT some R to reach some a. Or, adopting an a, a corresponding R appears with a given Gm.

 

IN TNED PHYSICS, BEGINNING FROM THE K-CELL DETONATION — AFTER A PRECEDING CONTRACTION — THE NEUTRON MASS DENSITY Dmax = 1.87 T17 KG/M³ a (nUn)4(c0/h)3/4 part in EartRADalt G-rank IS ALREADY GIVEN, EQUAL FOR ALL PRIMARY CELESTIAL BODIES — in a closest possible physical sense: perfect spheres: practically no rotation, only mechanical contractive forces preceding divergence ignition (active electromagnetism when local gravitation enters a c>0 as the K-cell expands). SO, AT THAT MOMENT ALL PARAMETERS ARE KNOWN IN DETAIL (The Fusion Limit Mass in TNED can readily be calculated).

 

 

EarthMassFindCON: EMFdensity

CONCLUSION — Compare: The discovery of Mathematics

WITHOUT A PROPER KEY ¦ EARTH CRUST MINERALOGY: CWON ¦ CAP

a full scale answer — »with all the trimmings»

THE QUEST OF A FIX EARTH MASS QUANTITY

— is or has become, more or less, a meaningless expedition. So: How did The Exact Nature 5.975 come — ±<3GRAM?

———————————————

CAP ¦ Primary distribution of elements inside Earth ¦ DIAsquare ¦ BaseCHART ¦ CELESTIAL bodies building time — from Dmax to Dnormal¦

 

WITH (MATIK ¦  PRIMARY NEUTRON NUCLEAR BIOCHEMICAL MATRICES ¦ 2020+) THE SURVEY OF THE EARTH SURFACE'S ELEMENTS AND THEIR ISOTOPIC COMPOSITION IN AtmosBiosLitos (atmosphere, biosphere with hydrosphere, and lithosphere) — 1900s collected geological data (PrimDATA) — A MOST DEFINITE highly independent (previously hidden) AND CONCLUSIVE INFORMATION ON THE MASS OF THE EARTH DID ARRIVE.

 

ON THE 5.975 OldG6.67 FIGURE

NATURE UNCOVERS EARTH'S MASS:

EXCEPT THROUGH CAP concentric atomic production WE CANNOT SAY HOW — ONLY THAT

 

AR1 with additional AR23 and others apparently certify how Earth mass equivalents appear from the general Earth surface masses in the

jH2O Chart and its 1900s well tabled isotopic quantities, distributions and compositions on Earth's surface. Their apparently complete whole number solutions (CAP ¦ CWON) with mutual connections leave no doubt or room for doubt on the quest of their origin:

— nature. Perfect Assembly — latest seen 1812 (MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2).

11%:

 

BIOCHEMICAL EXPERTISE ON PLANET EARTH 2022+

DISCLAIM THIS IF YOU CAN — please

— UN AND WHO WITH ASSOCIATED: DISCLAIM THIS GLOBAL TOXIC ALARM:

Cause:

 

 

Exact VIRUS picture: what it is, what it looks like, how it evolves ”MUTATES” in universe, and from where, and under what conditions — do disclaim the one who can.

 

Biochemical reaction potential — maximum low energy loss with highest/fastest chemical efficiency — relates directly to mass/atomic weight:

1–O16/O18=11.11%; A natural self protecting forest field (Simard2012 ¦ DOLE1965 ¦ CWON) implements O16 for plant growth: basic amino acid and protein biological chemistry for all life (Leaf&Needle OxygenFilter). If deforested — killed Leaf&Needle dumped on air CO2 excess, air gases by atomic weight — the nearest oxygen replacement is O18: number of atoms abundance ratio naturally-cyclic photosynthesis O16 to nearest O18 at ground level (worst case) is: 1/150. You can do the math yourself on present geo-bio-data.

 

 

 

Effect on significant loss of Leaf&Needle solar energy up taking agents:

The original (3Gy) Leaf&Needle O16 Oxygen Filtering DNA-regulating agents for all life loses chemical binding force in proportion to replacement of heavier elements: natural biochemical fabrication has ceased. Come again. Say again:

 

UppropLMI ¦ ErrorAGENT ¦ DataSource: Compiled from general Wikipedia articles [2020+]

 

 

•   the biochemical chains of molecular binding does not properly connect any more;

•   it does not matter how much artificially created biochemical juice the Pharm Industry is pushing in:

•   biochemistry cannot affect, manipulate, change or alter natural life chemistry power — OTHER than by attacking ITS NATURE:

— The academic biochemistry elite on Earth have excellent insight into the biochemical STRUCTURE — but guaranteed zero knowledge of HOW it was assembled: The (1950+) Miller Experiments gave good fruitful onsets to the principle natural idea — with good results. But THAT is far from The Real F1 Engine Math Story — down to the last atom:

Dmax neutron nuclear chemical matrices on all without exception surface primary cosmic bodies — later meteorite material for proof and comparison

once assembled FROM Dmax, no power, force or other can change the content — except by intrusion. Come again. Say again. So: Do disclaim: Nature it is. Not modern academy.

•   Life’s biological system  cannot be manipulated once assembled by cosmological principles; modern academic chemistry has no knowledge of that one — as so provable by mathematics and physics alone down to the last detailed atom: coupling just continues to fail and fall — ”mutate” — in extending detail — until the life decreasing cause is removed and natural health — forest, Leaf&Needle — order is reinstated. Because life chemistry was never constructed — mathematically physically chemically cosmologically assembled — to work on OTHER premises; as if reductions would be chemically replaceable by a creature that Life aimed at to PROMOTE, NOT KILL so to speak; as if life would have an ethical price. IT APPARENTLY HAS NOT. Is not decency a scientific subject — care? Oh yes mama, it is. Very is: Addressing the individual outside human-right recognition defines exercising oppression (P1 UDHR10Dec1948).

 

 

 

   Life does not work on bargaining. More than 30% of the Leaf&Needle forest area was removed 1800-2000 (ForestWORLD2012), and raising. With only less 70% left of the original life building agency, the term ”natural” apparently has lost its meaning: The plague is caused by humanity — on its violation upon the nature that made it: Nature is defending herself from a real bad guy.

 

STATE attacks its own internationally asseverated societal contract  ” .. of the greatest importance .. ” — Marker :  what 30% can you spare? Do share greatest.

PERFECT ASSEMBLY. No flaws. No errors. Leaf&Needle built life: sun energy transfer agents. Perfect beauty .. until ..

 

We, humans, are — were — apparently looking at a most highly advanced and fully ordered construct. No chance. No random. 100% preserved natural evolution from a preserved naturally flourishing Leaf&Needle solar energy up taking agency. Then something happened 1800+: Humans began to remove more than 30% of the natural forest area, period 1800-2000. Source ForestWORLD2012. 200 years. More than 30%. Scream that from the Moon; »Humanity went insane».

— Why — what was the reason? 100% intelligence. Natural insight: 0%. With even less than 70% left, the ”natural” has left humanity. A state of global chaos has emerged — piece by piece, little by little, until the whole Ship was wrecked. 100% intelligence. Natural insight: 0%.

   Are the leading papers (Dec2021) full of any kind of type of self inquiring critique (»end this biological life weakening madness — NOW»)? Not one word. Not one sound. Not one spot. 100% intelligence. Natural insight: 0%. Pharm industry. Say again. Come again. Math Class.

— »Stupid Ignorant Nature attacks us — and Pharm industry is here to fight it». No Forest Reflexion. Not one word.

 

NATURE 18May2021

WATER AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS SUN ENERGY UP TAKING AGENTS: Leaf&Needle. 100%. Note that in explicit: S and c today are severely corrupted.

— Because: Period 1800-2000 [ForestWORLD2012] more than 30% was removed; the S/c only counts with a 100% preserved Natural Forest.

— State’s looting and sacking has made something else. That is also a proof: STATE ATTACKS NATURE. And Nature Answers: Test this one:

Nature — a Life Planet in Universe — is 1800+ under grave serious attack: an exact image of The Virus Power Mutating Morphology?:

 

 

 

— NATURE has entered a state of defense — against an intruder. Nature rules the universe. Not modern pharmaceutical academy. Disclaim, the one who can.

   The world 2020+ has entered a state of Alarm. But few seem to understand its gravity — acting as if Nature is A Senseless Sucker Evil Stupid Attacker.

 

 

THE WAY to Her heart? NATURE PROVIDES US WITH KEYS (profiled comprehensive structures) leading us to the answers — as speechless flat dead squared paper leads us to mathematics and geometry (music) — leading to further keys for further progress: the history of science. Mathematics and physics. Say I’m wrong: THAT WOULD BE the absolute foundation — definition — of CARE:

 

LastREF:

Last reference 1812: MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2:

 

NATURAL HEALTH — example: woman after 3Gy — only counts with a 100% preserved natural forest: The S/c proportion in $.

Nature. Reduced, corrupted, compromised during 200 years period 1800-2000 by more than 30% [ForestWORLD2012]. Now 2020¦21+: global alarm [Quinney2020].

—————————————————————————————————

INTEGRATED — MOST READ SOCIAL MEDIA POPULAR WORLD NEWS — the fact is: MOST@zero. Not one word.

—————————————————————————————————

•   Leaf&Needle Global Plant Growth Oxygen16Filter: 11% impoverished by Deforestation:

 

— apparent tree death:

 

TreeDeath:

 

Sweden — mind caring national authority in universe:

— EXEMPLIFIED SWEDISH STATE GOVERNMENTAL INDUCEMENT IN EXPLICIT aim to kill LEAF&NEEDLE (Sweden 2012+¦2020):

•   Earth humanity clear cut example of national governmental insanity — Sweden (2012+) Oct2020-May2021: apparent mentally exercising authority:

•   ”cut the oxygen”:

 

 

 

WHAT REPLACES THE REDUCTION?

— biochemical depletion: plants/animals have no longer a natural existential right — apparently increasing road corpses ..

— wildfires (USA+) — growing amount of dead dry wood (with increasingly less natural wind damping) — apparently on an exploding frequency;

•   General Global Life decrease;

•   Life Force DNA regulation tenability on decrease with decreasing Leaf&Needle solar energy up taking agents.

 

 

STATE ATTACKS NATURE Part 1 — DISCLAIM THAT, ANYONE WHO CAN — and these are the provable facts Jan2022:

———————————————————————————————————

MODERN ACADEMY 1800+ SHUT DOWN DERIVABLE NATURAL INSIGHTS

———————————————————————————————————

During a rough 3 billion year (3Gy) period Nature has evolved life on Earth in Universe — on a (DOLE1965) recognized Oxygen16 Filtering BioGAS (CO2) basis. As here, emphasized by a sole TNED cosmologically deduced CAP (concentric atomic production). It is attested in CWON (complete whole number solution) from Earth atmosphere and crust isotopic composition (simple elementary force morphologically neutron nuclear matrices on the same neutron decaying principles with following exothermal fusion reaction as in THE PERIODIC SYSTEM: basic MATIK). And so further certified on the Top Earth Distributed Elements on the Earth mass equivalents (PrimDATA: 3 independent 1900s science data sources on Earth atmosphere and crust content); In explicit (jH2O):

C12orig → (C12rem + N14 + O18)even + (C13 + N15 + O17)odd; A separate lower lying pure O16 layer with a top end neutron/Hydrogen layer composes the actual Earth water bank (20[mSEA=1.4 T21 KG also in NASA FACTS]): 1mSEA is the present Earth surface water, 19mSEA are lithospherically integrated with crust materials (TimeLINE: CO-O water  Earth-crust in-boiling period) from a primary resulting basic top layer (Detailed ¦ ICE) WITH primary biochemical matrices included — on the same exact general cosmological foundation as all other primary celestial bodies — consistently and gallantly proved and certified by meteorite samples[‡].

 

 

STATE ATTACKS NATURE Part 2 — DISCLAIM THAT, ANYONE WHO CAN — and these are the provable facts Jan2022:

———————————————————————————————————

MODERN ACADEMY 1800+ SHUT DOWN DERIVABLE NATURAL INSIGHTS

———————————————————————————————————

1800+: The 3Gy life sustaining and evolving agency ceases on human enterprise reduction of the Nature based Leaf&Needle solar up taking biosurface energy. During the period 1800-2000 (ForestWORLD2012) more than 30% (37% ¦ DEFORESTATION GRAPH) of the Leaf&Needle ground forest sustaining area is removed. A corresponding air dumped carbon dioxide (ground CO2) based Leaf&Needle excess follows — as after a wildfire. But never allowed to return and reestablish a continued the 3Gy natural biochemical balance. With the cyclic biogas reduced O16 from deforestation — killed Leaf&Needle solar energy agents — the heavier (O18am) O18 is the only nearest vacant oxygen replacement (air gases by atomic weight, worst cases: heaviest lowest, lightest above). The ratio on the available data sources show there are 150 oxygen atoms O18 on each undisturbed naturally preserved Nature Forest cyclic chlorophyll producing plant oxygen O16 atom. Little by little, piece by piece, the 1800+ deforestation activity drives a forcing life power reduction — up to an inevitable point where a TIP — a biochemical flip — appears. The weakened biochemical transfer of molecular buildings sooner or later drops in significant efficiency: medical consequences appear — in all life biology domains. Plants, insects, higher animals: humans. It is NOT a ”virus”. It evolves ”mutates” spontaneously as headache from bad eating habit exactly as long as so promoted — as rust fragments solid iron. No force, power or instance in our universe exists that will or can stop the pandemic in such a situation — other than this: Return nature forest to its intended life sustaining origin — and stop pissing on Nature as NOT The origin of Intelligence.

   SHE is it. And order and health will return. Bottom line:

— In a NATURAL TECHNOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF HUMAN CULTURE 1800+: MODERN ACADEMY missed the on-ramp. And bad too — to the atomic bone. It has established a general idea of scientific knowledge in humanity — in a nearest comparing level of: »worse than 1311». Have your say. Mathematics and physics.

 

End of Latest World News Jan2022. (NASA is building rescue Arks for immigration to Pluto .. don’t forget to bring battery ..).

 

SUM:

As summarized by CWON through CAP,

MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2

attested by Earth mass equalities AR123:

•   General atmospheric oxygen (O16¦17¦18) and hydrosphere (Earth's water bank jH2O) on the one hand and cyclic biogas oxygen (O16 ¦ BioGAS) on the other hand are two different physical domains (VoJ). They are also naturally in related physics details assembled under different physical and chronological circumstances (TimeLINE) and conditions.

None of these properties are known in present established quarters. Compare the most prominent: “water came from the outside”. Invention, not deduction and thereby a provable in detail grave delusion characterizes the present established ideas (1800+ ¦ The LIST).

•   Details in Photosynthesis (COMPLETE GROW-DECAY PHOTO-CYCLE) clarify the present missing links (TheCENTRAL) in established ideas: Identical chemical ranks — completely different interpretations due to the established “water from the outside”; It has so provably by detail corrupted the whole foundational understanding of the biological concept. The SD-transporter — DETAILS IN THE KEELING CURVE — explains why modern academy 1800+ missed the on-ramp: 100% PRESERVED NATURE FORESTS IN 1812 LAST KNOWN MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 STOCK PROVES IN EVERY DETAIL THAT

•   plants do not produce oxygen — plants circulate growth oxygen (DOLE1965 ¦ OxygenO16Filter) inside the cyclic biogas ($=S+c+MLN)

— severely corrupted and compromised 1800+ by humanity:

S/c proportion in $

 

•   plants do not dissolve water (COMPLETE GROW-DECAY PHOTO-CYCLE ¦ a complete 100% recycling process on water’s intact transportation ¦ EXPERIMENTAL LIMITATIONS ¦ THE CENTRAL GROWTH QUARRELING SUBJECT ¦ there is nothing wrong with the experiments — only the knowledge of their conditions);

•   plants do not take growth carbon from air, but from water (BioEK4TableLOWER1999) through the roots (CO2+H2O);

•   plants do not take fossil carbon — IF THEY WOULD THIS TREATISE IS A COMPLETE CRAP. See THE PETROLEUM ORIGIN QUEST; carbonic deposits (graphite, diamonds and others ..) are made, or can so be understood to be made, separately by the same principal BASIC NEUTRON NUCLEAR MATRIX COMPOSITION as is the case with the basic biochemical matrices in example — also in meteorites. In modern corridors, none of these alternatives are known (except BERGOLJA some in the old school on the theory of petroleum origin): Not one single atom. The (BioEK1-10: TheTEN) balance between atmosphere and lithosphere (fossil deposits) apparently guarantee — certifies and attests — that the biospherical biogas ($=S+c+MLN) is sequestered — held and kept intact — from any destructive or intrusive imbalance so that it can restore any intrusive impact — by time: nature’s own healing defense. This was already clear from (Feb2017) The MAUNA LOA PROOF. The more alive killed Leaf&Needle, the more The Situation worsens. Present world nations are constantly attacking Nature on all fronts — senselessly acting as Masters of A Universe they apparently understand nought of.

•   Modern Academy Teaching System 1800+ is full of invented — not deduced — ideas and terms explaining a universe that only exists in a mind of delusion. Provable in every detail in to the last atom — or not at all (The LIST). The gain has always been INSTRUMENTATION — artistry, craftsmanship, the real steel of the deal. It will evolve.

 

 

RESULTS VERIFY OldG6.670 over newG6.6743

 

•   The newG6.6743 Earth mass 5.972 does not pass the AR123 jH2O whole number connecting explaining complex (and too, far from).

— See in explicit (CryP1 and CryP2 tests).

•   The newG6.6743 Earth mass 5.972 neither passes the specific rJCIRCLE CHEOPStest (PCt ¦ CheopsTESTET) — which is understandable from quite separate points of view: modern academy has no ”Dmax” universe. Modern academy has by principle no possible even theoretical connection to the test.

 

 

 

The Earth mass equivalents (AR123 ¦ BioGAS)

 

from the (2020 PrimDATA) Earth atmosphere and crust revealed 10 foremost biologically communicating equivalents (TheTEN ¦ BioEK1-10) certified on a complete whole number solution (CWON) as attested by the TNED cosmologically deduced matter physics and biochemical nuclear general cosmological neutron matrix system as governed by the same TNED deduced (ATOMIC NUCLEUS: The Planck ring Constant h=mcr=neutron) force morphology as the TNED/CWON one deduced from

(Feb2017 MaunaLoaProof ¦ Outclass ¦ CompilEXP ¦ Meteorite Proof ¦ BioEK1-10 ¦ BioGAS ¦ CAP¦ CWON¦ AR123)

NUCLEAR MATRIX ALGORITHM in THE PERIODIC SYSTEM found equal for all primary celestial bodies by

the physical and mathematical principle of concentric atomic production (CAP)

———————————————

AR123 ¦ BioGAS ¦ PrimDATA ¦ TheTEN ¦ BioEK1-10 ¦ CWON ¦ The Planck ring Constant ¦ NUCLEAR MATRIX ALGORITHM ¦ THE PERIODIC SYSTEM ¦ CAP 

 

expose and attest an exactly provable cosmological ingenuity of prominence in sovereign harmonizing biology, physics and mathematics:

•   There exists in our universe a general cosmological preference — attesting a basic life promoting harmony on already evolved species — however effectively extincted the last 200 years by inducements having no part in the attested:

 

— A collective effort of prominently ignorant and nature harassing movements, with no other authority than ability to attack, destroy and deny continue to claim supremacy over nature, denying, destroying and bullying human rights.

IF YOU CARE FOR MY PRIVACY, HOW COME YOU INTERRUPT ME WITHOUT MY PERMISSION?

WHO INVITED YOU? AND WHEN DID THAT HAPPEN? PLEASE DO SHARE.

   Humanity is apparently 1800+ explicitly under heavy destructive attack — from humanity:

— a senseless 100% morality depleted general fuck-up with absolute zero interest in science:

— no human right. Not one word. Not one spell. Not one spot. A 100% claiming supremacy zero knowledge creep.

 

 

— »DON'T BLAME DEFORESTATION FOR THE COVID».

 

There are deforestation profiting movements and inducements all over the world (2022)

seeking with all their might and power

to DISPROVE any — all — attempts claiming THAT type

 

A 100% PRESERVED NATURE FOREST WITH ZERO DEFORESTATION

IS THE ONLY FOUNDATION OF BIOLOGICAL HEALTH, SANITY AND

INTELLIGENT APPREHENSION OF THE BARE IDEA OF

A FULLY DEVELOPED TECHNOLOGICAL CULTURE. No exceptions.

 

Here is an excellent opportunity for these eminent human fellows to

claim such a THEIR VERY OWN personal final proof

ONCE AND FOR ALL TIMES — EVER:

 

$ total biogas, S standing, c cyclic: Leaf&Needle [The biologic Oxygen16Filter] — we welcome any related disclaiming argument. Search for, non yet found.

S/c proportion in $

↑

•   »We don't give a shit»:

 

The MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 BIOLOGICALLY BioEK1-10 CONCURRING QUANTIFIED AR123 PROVABILITIES OF mJ=5.975T24KG as founded (BioGAS ¦ jH2O ¦ CWON ¦ CAP ¦ MATIK) ON ITS TOP SURFACE ISOTOPIC MATERIAL COMPOSITION, ATTESTING A 100% BIOLOGICAL SOLIDITY ONLY on the explicit BioEK1¦1475 MLN1812 documented 100% Nature Preserved Forest Preference (TODAY 2020+ ONLY BY DEFORESTATION REDUCED TO 1254 — ADVERTISING A CORRESPONDING GLOBAL TOXIC ALARM EVEN SINCE 1962)    •   is apparently autonomously LOCKED into a position as to exclude any type, sort or nature of disclaimer: — It is impossible to undo, break up or even question on any argumentative base, if correctly apprehended — as GRAVITATION and ELECTRICITY and HUMAN RIGHTS is. Saying: There is no way to separate these other than this: »We don't give a shit». Have your say.

 

Explanation:

•   HUMANITY IN UNIVERSE has the ability to AFFECT

— compromise, make seemingly corrupt, change

— only one (1) of The TEN (BioEK1-10) mutually with Earth mass communicating biologically harmonizing attested and certified equivalents (BioGAS ¦ CWON ¦ jH2O) from Earth’s (PrimDATA: 3 independent 1900s science data sources on Earth atmosphere and crust content) AtmosBiosLitos general isotopic content (CAP ¦ MATIK).

Namely this one — BioEK1:

•   The ratio of the number of OXYGEN atoms in Earth's atmosphere — AtmosO — to the number of CARBON atoms in the last documented known preserved natural not significantly affected by human hand atmosphere 1812-100% Nature Forest Preference — MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2

— IS

 

1475 = nATMOS¦O ÷ nMLN¦C = BioEK1

 

•   The corresponding Deforestation part — only, the fossil part omitted — on the atmospheric accumulated CO2 (by 2020 ¦ >400ppmvCO2 and still rising 2022) is

 

1254 — a globally biologically toxic alarm should have been declared already year: 1962 (Deforestation37%): the more deforestation (KilledAliveLeaf&NeedleCO2+), the lower the value:

— biochemically toxic alarm. Plants suffer. Animals suffer. Humans suffer.

 

•   It is obvious that the mJ=5.975 T24 KG Earth mass biologically attested equivalent in BioEk1

MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2

does NOT hold for atmospheric Oxygen/Carbon — not at all — below (neither over) the mineralogically bio-equivalents attested 1475. IT appears as A NATURAL HEALTH MARKER.

The ability to experience strong indignation — on the bare view of an obvious rape.

 

With a closest ”1474” the mJ=5.975 value becomes 5.60166666666667.. . Not even the most famous modern academic scientist will approve of that today — Nature result says. No mother god loving way. The closest adversary (EMFresult ¦ EarthPOINT) is the 5.972 one. But that one passes not the MLN1812 preference test (CryP1). And so, not even close: — »Do you surrender freely»?

 

So: The only thing the growing popular deforestation profiting movements with continued eminent inducements all over the world (2022) will have to (continue) to do in declaring their continental faith in economic progress IS — now, be welcome, and more direct openly — a more stringently underlined proclamation once and for all, clearly:

 

•   »We don't give a shit».

   Perfect Assembly.

   There is no other left alternative, as we know. And there apparently never was: CARE.

 

Application:

 

— Vad kul att du engagerar dig .. MSokt2020

 

 

” .. ladda ner appen ..”

— Och medan du ändå är på väg ut kan du ta med dig soporna också.

 

 

 

SUNmass: 1Dec2021 — Compilation

 

mS = 1.989661830 T30 KG — TNED COSMOLOGY ONLY

PRESENT attested ACTUAL MASS OF OUR SUN

mS = (2π/t)2R3/G

——————————————————————————————————

DYNAMIC ACTUAL MASS — THROUGH KEPLER'S THIRD  mS = (2π/t)2R3/G

One precise possible Sun Mass Calculation

SUN LOSES MASS CONTINUOUSLY WITHOUT any here known MASS INFLOW

——————————————————————————————————

 

 

BUT IT NEEDS A SPECIFIC (EXACT) G-VALUE (first 1798 by Cavendish within 1%) FOR DETERMINATION

which can only be tested to fit by iteration ..

 

The only known way in this presentation of finding such an »exact» G value is (any other suggestion is welcome)

BY TAKING AN ENTIRE UNIVERSAL COSMOLOGICAL »ALL ESSENTIAL PARAMETERS» CALCULATION

 

»all explained in one» — leave no one behind: everybody is entitled “to share in scientific advancement and its benefits”

In a (normal) spreadsheet the rank must be reorganized (Gtest) on the ten powers: as is, the program will not compute.

 

through the (Oct2018)TNED/IAU test — Sun's photometric effect (all specifications in ResTAB):

•   We input a (test 6.67) G-value, calculate the Sun mass through Kepler's Third mS = (2π/t)2R3/G, R=1AU=1.4959787 T11 M, knowing the anomalistic period 365.259425d and the mean ellipsis length (2AU); we use the instrumental epoch standard:

•   We take the TNED math physics readout of a corresponding Sun mass in a separate calculus cell until Kepler's show up:

•   We read the result in the Photometric Effect result. Until IT — if at all — shows the IAU Sun measured value 3.8275 T26 W.

— Iterations continues until — if at all — The IAU match arrives.

   TNED RESULT (Oct2018):

 

General cosmological TNED physics test on the entire K-cell mathematical physics:

Solar system age: 20.805Gy;  year time: 365.256363004d; present rVIZ: visual radius of universe: 1025.0491345 Mpc;

K-cell mass: 4.161433381298 T53 KG

 

 

•   With G = 6.67000002 t11 JM/(KG)² the IAU value 3.827500000 arrives in precise — on the Kepler's Nov2021mSUN = 1.989661830 T30 KG.

 

FOR THE RECORD OF CALCULATING THE SUN'S MASS THROUGH KEPLER'S THIRD

on the Earth-Moon mass system propagation in the anomalistic ellipse — through perihelium twice —

IT IS SUFFICIENT WITH ONLY precisely measured ONE REVOLUTION PERIOD:

— Sun loses mass continuously (by very small proportions) — and the elliptic orbit grows proportionally: mS = (2π/t)2R3/G;

— The balancing centrifugal force from the Earth-Moon system becomes less contracted towards the Sun as its gravitational mass power decreases due to its production of light and heat.

•   The effect is that the mean distance factor R increases with a corresponding increasing orbital period (t).

   So. It need not be more than one single occasion of a (precise) measure to settle the time factor (and the elliptic major axis length, given the appropriate instrumentation). Over hundreds of years a still more precise value will appear — or/and reveal differences.

 

mJbalance: SunMASS

COMPARE corresponding attempts IN MEASURING EARTH’S MASS

No precise Earth orbital mass calculation exists

ASSUMED PERFECT BALANCE BETWEEN HYDROGEN AND HELIUM MASS ESCAPE AND COSMIC DUST INFLOW

 

 

•   Even WITH a precise G value (for further test) AND assuming Earth mass is a constant, the Earth mass value will NOT allow itself to be captured by any kind or sort of mathematical calculus. Why? The influence from the Sun itself in the Moon orbit around the Earth — and the Moon's (and Sun's) influence on artificially satellites around the Earth — make (significant) contributions as well as the Earth FORM itself, including its inner (crust) and tidal changes. These ruin a deeper »exact» instrumental measure.

 

Some of these aspects are touched in the below cited references (web sample Nov2021):

 

 

”  Mass redistributions inside, on, and above the Earth's surface are responsible for time variable gravity field forces, which directly influence a satellite's orbit. In case these variations have a frequency above the Nyquist frequency, which is defined by the repeat period of a satellite orbit, one has to take into account these mass variations during orbit determination in order to avoid aliasing due to undersampling.”,

”   It is obvious that mass variations by tidal forces and in the coupled atmosphere–ocean system occur by far with higher frequencies than the Nyquist frequency of a single satellite mission.”,

OXFORD ACADEMIC — Geophysical Jornal International, Volume 182, Issue 2, August 2010, Pages 797–80

Published: 01 August 2010 ¦ https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/182/2/797/571275

;

”   4.3 Anomalistic Month

The anomalistic month is defined as the revolution of the Moon around its elliptical orbit as measured from perigee to perigee. The length of this period can vary by several days from its mean value of 27.55455 days (27d 13h 18m 33s).”,

”   The length of the draconic month is strongly modulated by the position of the nodes with respect to the major axis of the Moon's orbit. The histogram in Figure 4-11 shows how the draconic month changes from 2008 through 2017. The 173-day alignment of the Sun with a node appears as the rapid oscillation in the month length. The quasi-sinusoidal envelopes surrounding the minima and maxima form two longer period oscillations. Over the 10-year period covered in this figure, the minimum month duration varies from 27.089 to 27.011 days (3.0 to 4.8 hours shorter than the mean). The maximum month duration ranges from 27.261 to 27.472 days (1.2 to 6.2 hours longer than the mean).”,

NASA — ECLIPSES AND THE MOON'S ORBIT (2021)

https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEhelp/moonorbit.html

:

THAT MEANS TO SAY:

— Attempting to ANOMALISTICALLY MEASURE Earth’s mass (through Kepler’s Third) by ”Moons anomalistic orbit around the Earth” arrives at a safe 100% crash — any way we count.

   The Satellite part meets (practically) the same issue: additional (in and out) parameters must be compensated for — craving a minor computer central for keeping track of the variations (none here cited, all implied).

 

 

•   So how the “exact” of THE MASS OF THE EARTH?

   ANSWER:

— It takes form — gradually through the history of science (precision measurements on the surface ..).

— See further from EarthPoint and EARTH RADIUS. The results might surprise the reader.

 

 

 

 

UniverseSAND:

 

COSMIC PRODUCTION

 

 

In order to balance out the Earth atmospheric Hydrogen (9.5 T7 KG/y) and Helium (0.16 T7 KG/y) mass escape, an input of only one single itty bitty tiny grain of sand (1mM 2.3 t6 KG) per year over each 12 M² of the Earth’s surface will suffice to keep the balance exact. One grain. Or over each one M² Earth surface: 12 years per M². What we know: there is (by far) no physical instrumental device with which to carry out, even theoretically, such a verifying, or disclaiming scientific expedition.

— »Grandpa’s Diary». One per 12 years.

— But, says modern corridors, from where would such come?

 

”Conditions in interstellar space are generally not suitable for the formation of silicate cores. This would take excessive time to accomplish, even if it might be possible. The arguments are .. it would take considerably longer than the age of the Universe for interstellar grains to form.”,

Wikipedia 20Dec2021 on Cosmic Dust

 

The principle of it is understood, very well. But the general cosmological idea of how physics itself built the universe places definit intrusive markers — in modern corridors.

•   DARK MATTER IN TNED is most easily explained from CAP by a general neutron nuclear SiO2 matrix: the main WASTE from primary body building (SIU) — see also GENERAL NEUTRON NUCLEAR MATRICES from CAP:

 

 

 

Banned in modern quarters:

POSSIBLY PRIMARY SURFACE EJECTED IN ENORMOUS AMOUNTS

 

———————————————

CAP ¦ Primary distribution of elements inside Earth ¦ DIAsquare ¦ BaseCHART ¦ CELESTIAL bodies building time — from Dmax to Dnormal¦ Modern academy: ”water from the outer”

 

 

TAT: Usand

A TREATISE ON THE MILKY WAY AND ITS NEAR NEIGHBOR ANDROMEDA — and some small change, give or take

A GRAIN OF SAND IN UNIVERSE

The Andromeda test:

ANDROMEDA—MILKY-WAY GALAXY MOTION?

Doppler shift observations (WIKIPEDIA2021data) states that ”The Andromeda Galaxy is approaching the Milky Way at about 110 kilometers per second” on an estimated distance center-center of 765 Kpc (2.361 T22 M). Meaning: A worst case center-center meeting will come some t=(6 800 100 418.90765 y) 6.8 Gy from now.

— The NASA article (Article Stamp: ”10.14.04”? Is that 2010 or 2014 or 2004?) sampled 9Dec2021 (featuring a class lecture on Andromeda-MilkyWay)

nasa.gov /audience/forstudents/5-8/features/F_When_Gallaxies-Collide.html

STUDENT FEATURES — MILKY WAY VS ANDROMEDA :

says ”The students fear this may be the end of life .. But, their teacher reassures her class that there is very little chance of stars” directly impacting our Sun or Earth.

•   That feels comforting (whispered Carl to Helen ..).

— TNED class has another solution — completely absent in modern corridors seen to the universe as a whole, but accepted in modern quarters close to heavy individual masses:

•   Light’s Gravitational Dependency on RELATED ABSOLUTE METRICS

•c0 ..... c1 ..... c2 ..... c3 ..... c4 ..... c5 ..

— more enveloped mass, less relative local speed of light, meaning seen from a g-center:

•   Gravitational RED shift (longer light-waves) increases with distance from g-center, meaning: BLUE shift (shorter light-waves) is read/measured instrumentally with light coming from g-center arriving to a station (US) outside it: same principal Instrumental Doppler observation as between moving objects (speed-camera).

   In this Andromeda test we will (try to) expedite a thorough analysis of that mathematics, and see where it leads — it leads to a quite different possible interpretation: Andromeda lies close to a universal g-center, while Milky Way is resting quite near to it (internal g-center density/gravity distribution equilibrium), or eventually rotates around the g-center (Andromeda ¦ LateralTEST) on a very (very hard to determine) small amount: No collision — ever.

 

It came as a bonus .. ITM ¦ ITEM ¦ ITMresult ¦ AndTER ¦ THE ANDROMEDA LATERAL TEST

THE GREAT ANDROMEDA TEST

 

 

 

The radial part of the Andromeda test. See also AndromedaLATERAL.

EarthMass2021IAU.ods Tabell3¦A97

RAM:

KINETICS — Light’s liberty clause in related physics: light connects not to kinetics:

RELATED ABSOLUTE METRICS — light’s (divergence’s) gravitational dependency (DGD) in TNED:

•   a location with higher gravitational potential (more enveloped mass Gm/r — TNED K-cell physics) affects light’s divergence (speed) with

— reduced electromagnetic frequency on elongated electromagnetic wavelengths:

•   no matter where in the electromagnetically active universe the speed of light (divergence) is measured, light’s gravitational dependency certifies and guarantees that one and the same local constant c0 = 2.99792458 T8 M/S will be the result of such electromagnetic measures (properties of the atomic nucleus: gravitation’s fundamental form). Cannot be changed, altered, affected or modified. However, the (kinetic) dynamics efficiency also reflects.

 

 

MODERN ESTABLISHED INTERPRETATION OF THE DOPPLER MEASURED VALUE

TABLES with measured Doppler values suggest that the Andromeda Galaxy relative our Milky Way Galaxy approaches with a velocity of 275 KM/S (BA1978s315.Tab15.3). With a present estimated cc-distance of 2.13 T22 M it means:

•   after t=d/v = (2,13 T22 M)/(275 000 M/S) = 2.454386438 T9y ~ 2.45Gy their centers have merged — provided a head on impact.

— The NASA article says ”The students fear this may be the end of life .. But, their teacher reassures her class that there is very little chance of stars” directly impacting our Sun or Earth.

•   That must be comforting.

 

Basic data from Cambridge International Astronomy 1977/78 BA1978 — we will later compare with more recent figures (WikipediaDec2021)

 

PRESENT Dec2021DATA FROM WIKIPEDIA (ITEM) PRESENTS ALTERNATIVE VALUES FOR TEST.

Present 2021 standard of confidence: 2.5Gy from now, Milky Way has collapsed with Andromeda to a »mixed whatever remains» cargo subject. The sky will be (very) different.

•   The present scientific interpretation is based on a universal idea that ”the velocity of light has the same value everywhere” independent of location: no general universal gravitational Doppler effect is accounted on. All Doppler effect results — light wavelength measuring and comparing — point out MOVING OBJECTS.

— So: The only modern academic scientific possible interpretive way between Milky and Andro is a (head on) impact:

• → 2.3 T22 M ← •

 

TNED COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE DOPPLER MEASURED VALUE

TNED physics and cosmology (K-cell Heat Physics) has an additional option besides the conventional moving part:

•   Gravitational Doppler effect: Our Universe has a distinct g-center with c=c0, decreasing further out with Doppler Red.

— That is the modern academic corresponding effect of ”dark energy” (»additional expansion of the universe») — because a gravitational universal Doppler effect is banned in modern corridors. If A UNIVERSAL gravitational Doppler effect is adopted, the modern academy cosmological theory crashes — guaranteed 100% completely.

 

Basic TNED view (what the distance tables show) — K-cell center:

DIER:

 

 

Milky Way Birth and present Age. TNED physics and cosmology calculates the only possible present explainable existence of a Milky Way ending up in the vicinity of the K-center as in an equal distance to the observed (adopted) average galaxy separation of about 3 Mpc (BA1978s324). Taking the K-cell’s DIER through that distance gives a time window of close to 10 My. As the K-cell heat physics solution gives a present value of 20.82Gy (20.815) for the age of our universe, the actual ideal age of Milky Way and all its stars and systems arrives at a 20.805Gy. Then the ideal position of Milky Way is »stay put» where it was developed from the K-cell inner wall expansion and its divergence ignition at 9.78 My after ”The Big Bang”.

— More likely, some additional velocity was given to the Milky Way Mother J-body. We will return to that aspect, soon.

 

 

 

IF NAMELY the observed and reported Doppler effect values do have some meaning here — our Milky Way and its neighbor Andromeda in example — the »REST OF THE STORY» will be explained by TNED physics and its K-cell properties (or not at all):

•   1 – (275 KM/S)/(c0=2.99 792 458 T8 M/S) = 0.999082698 the actual corresponding Andromeda Doppler blue shift value.

 

 

 

Testing the simple equation 1 – a + b = k = GRAVITATIONAL Doppler Blue From Andromeda any type of separation between Milky and Andro arriving at the k will do — as for example (the locally determined gravitational Doppler values  for a and b):

 

EarthMass2021IAU.ods Tabell3¦A112

 

 

Each of these (randomly) exemplified ab values corresponds (TNED says) to a significant STATIC NO MOTION gravitational position outside the a=b=1 K-center. Additional motion action adds additional Doppler values. The actual gravitational Doppler ratio c/c0 is determined

 

 

•   c/c0 = (1/2)(1 + √ 1 – 4r²πGD/3c0²)

 

with ρ (Greek, rho) replaced by D for a given local density parameter. With r=0 the c/c0 = 1. The equation (See a detailed deduction in Light’s Gravitational Dependency) extends to c/c0=½ which applies in calculating all the near K-cell center actions (changing the ± signs takes care of the remaining, but it has no connection to this following description).

 

THE THING IS, TNED says in its cosmological physics, that ONLY SPECIFIC such ab G Doppler values are relevant IF we are dealing with Milky and Andro NEAR THAT K-cell center which was implied in the basic determination of the age of the system. To be noted.

— Namely only those different a and b defining the actual distance Milky to Andro — precisely.

•   That can only present one single solution — says TNED for TNED — IF Milky and Andro are to be at at physical REST relative each other: no catastrophic novel:

The5th: DIER

BOTH Milky and Andro were developed from the K-cell inner divergence’s ignition expanding rim (DIER)

•   in four non-destructive possible ways:

 

 

 

STATISTICALLY a fifth candidate is directly seen as a RARE minority in possible end action (~ 3Mpc galaxy distances with the galaxies themselves more or less resembling grains of sand over the huge distances).

•   The calculated primary received velocity fits reasonably arriving at the K-cell centre region on our present time scale:

— v = 141 KM/S: 1 – v/c0 = 0.999529695 — IF applicable.

•   But we must also take into account the (huge) amount of DARK MATTER — TNED cosmology’s explained (huge) SAND mass given out over the entire divergence ignition resulting exothermal (GRB) bodies, ejecting enormous amount of waste material:

 

 

 

Schematically illustrated sequential divergence ignition — TNED treats GRB:s.  They are birth — not death — of galaxies and stars.

 

 

TNED calculations give the ratio 1/355 between visible mass and actual mass of the entire K-cell mass 4.16 T53 KG (ResTAB, the Oct2018IAU test). As the main ejected part surface matter is smeller or bigger neutron spheres (water drop analogy), their finest possible least dense products (easily) can form silicon-oxygen with other elements products. See the general neutron nuclear matrix in KOLMATRISEN — on the simple principle of CAP (concentric atomic production).

— As small as the come, they (easily) fill the huge empty space with mM grains separated by cubic kilometers in average distance.

:

— The K-cell density changes from Dmax 1.82 T17 KG/M² to 6 t29 KG/M² at the end (KcellAGE ¦ 336Gy). That is 46 powers of ten.

 

 

A universal TNED possible way to explain huge masses of type 1mM grains of sand with huge free space in between

THE RING AND SAND GRAIN ANALOGY IN THE EXPANDING INNER K-CELL'S INCREASING DENSITY

The K-cell expansion resembles the illustrated situation as follows (says TNED):

(Neutron Plasma distribution inside the expanding K-cell)

 

We can view the amount of neutrons collected in spherical masses after the K-cell detonation (extensive detailed mathematical deduction in The Detonation) as a collection of corresponding ideal differently sized mechanical spheres pacing explosively out from a spherical center.

   As the expansion pace is largest at the farthest outer →, and thereby the radial perpendicular ↨ separating force effect between nearby neutron balls maximized, the detached neutron mass balls become the smallest possible farthest out.

   Further in, with decreasing expansion pace and thereby lower separation force effect, successively larger neutron balls reside.

   Thereby, by physical principle as suggested, large balls further in with the smallest farthest out. (See also TNED in Expansion Mathematics)

SANDorigin: UNIVERSEsand

 

Detached primary neutron J-body masses on the K-cell inner side,

as explained by TNED physics (General Wave Equation). PREFIXxSIN.

 

As the zero divergence zone (DIER) sweeps the detached bodies, they behave as K-cell miniatures in their detonating moment. Then the whole expanding system can fragment down on elementary material cells — type galaxies with their inner subsystems of stars and planets — and huge amounts of “debris”; Possibly small type Earth mineral mM grains of crust, see basic neutron nuclear matrices from CAP, concentric atomic production. Because spread out by many cubic kilometer space per each single mM sized grain: practically impossible to detect — and completely without any kind of explaining theory whatsoever in modern quarters — see quote below.

 

 

Short English:

”.. Larger dust particles with sizes up to football format would without difficulty hold the cluster collected and still be impossible to discover; problem is only we have no knowledge of a simple process whereby such objects can form.”, BA1978s360.

 

— The principle is noted — but modern theory crashes: on origin.

 

DENSITYin: SANDorigin

 

THE POINT 1 IS THIS ONE — a possible density increase towards center:

•   DIVERGENCE (DEEP) — electromagnetic active force — is more active and potent when directed towards the inner lower gravitational potential max c0 centre of the expanding K-cell than the outer (the yet electromagnetically dormant neutron ball masses):

— See more detailed with proof in KCHIP.

•   Comparably — by principle — more mass is “ignited” to the in than the out as the K-cell advances by lighting up its universe:

•   Or more directly said: The K-cell inner receives or can so be understood to receive a proportionally larger amount of mass than would be the case with an ideal homogeneous density distribution all over the K-cell.

 

More expanding power directed towards the c>0 active K-cell inner than is directed to the outer (more electromagnetically dormant) K-cell expanding RIM outer edge certifies a principal higher degree of debris ejected to the in than to the out: The K-cell shows principal properties favoring a higher density distribution towards its inner parts, by time — thereby promoting an end station for the K-cell expansion history.

— But where do we find a reasonable physical — instrumentally measured — observed proof?

   See more detailed in The ANDROMEDA Test.

 

 

RESULT BY PRINCIPLE: K-cell inner partially higher density regions — by physical principle — tend to or can so be understood to attract individual masses towards the higher density’s most prominent gravitational region: The Mass Ring Analogy:

 

 

 

THE POINT 2 IS — the gravitational ring analogy:

•   With a principle inner assembly of a more dense (spherical) shell with a less dense region near K-center — as a ring of balls — a separate ball B inside the ring — taken all the actual spherical shells projected gravitational potentials on to it — resembles the situation of a steel ball lying on a shallow slope leaning towards the ring, and with a peak in the K-cell center:

•   The B-ball falls down to its most near gravitationally attracting part from the resulting gravitationally summed potentials:

— to the nearest ring side:

 

 

•   IF that affected mass had a beginning with a specific velocity directed towards the K-center, there is a (great) possibility that it will be detracted, and eventually end up in a stay put condition — on the edge of inner K-cell gravitationally balancing forces.

   The farthest outer parts of the K-cell can continue with the expansion without any hazard to the already established inner status.

 

THE POINT 3 IS:

IF there possibly also would be a remaining center (formed galaxy), the previous Fifth  »destructively excluded» possibility would transfer this type:

 

 

See more details from The ANDROMEDA Test.

THE INNER

— With an average galactic distance of some 3 Mpc = 9.3 T22 M (BA1978s324sp2n), the (DIER) r0c sweep reserves an ideal light time window of t = 3Mpc/c0 = 9.8 My. From that point the (MW) Milky Way galaxy is a principal candidate for birth in the universal history of TNED K-cell physics. If — also — ejected precisely on an opposed expansion velocity,

 

 

the MW stays put — apart from possible future attractive motions by nearby masses.

— IF the MW body final station history is supposed to have a slight greater net push velocity towards the (average 3Mpc distant) K-center, the time to reach that point taken on the whole of the present (TNED calculated 20.82Gy) universe’s age would be:

v = 3Mpc/20.82Gy ~ 141 KM/S.

— IF — again — the MW (then) would CONNECT to an already positioned (K-center, »The Andro»), the initial vMW could — could — possible become a rotational v as MW (slowly) adopts and connects to the (possibly heavier K-center) partner. That would be our present situation — for a (thorough) general test:

— Andromeda in K-center, and MW slightly outside — with a corresponding (ITMresults) Gravitational Doppler Blue of the reported measured magnitude: modern corridors: »they will collide in the future» — Type »popular Nobel prize festivities».

•   A (trajectory skewed) inside pushed J-mass body M may be attracted towards an inner edge (ring) side. But in meeting (a more massive) central J-body mass A, its attraction (and the opposite wall) will force the trajectory of M to approach A — with a possible situation that M ends up as a (very slow circulating) satellite to A (where A might experience some minor dislocation from its original K-center as well).

— The only way to settle what is what, will be to measure light (Doppler effects) from all positions around, ahead and back; setting up a »Doppler Trap».

AndromedaLATERAL: DENSITYin

There is (was: around 2012) an interesting (more detailed) FORUM DISCUSSION on the subject in

physics.stackexchange.com/questions ..

physics

ANDROMEDA/MILKY WAY COLLISION: HOW, AND HOW ACCURATELY, CAN A GALAXY’S

LATERAL VELOCITY  BE MEASURED?

— Several serious contributors hint at the central difficulty, along with aiming at possible measuring techniques (and reporting some results ..). Se also Wikipedia quote on in ITM.

— As for our ROTATIONAL possibility, the LATERAL or transversal (normal) component has the following illustrative possible status:

•   no doubt a measure exists. But: what is it?

 

 

 

Gravitational Doppler Blue — TNED cosmology not represented in modern quarters — explains the situation: no collision. In modern academy gravitational Doppler effects only counts for isolated mass bodies — never for the whole of the universe (see Fig.1). So, the academy has only one exit to chose on in this show: collision. The intelligence is fine. Problem is: its related content ..

 

 

TNED says (most probably): it is a rotation (further proving the K.cell center close to or within Andromeda).

 

•   IF the measure reflects a rotation, it will be, as far as here is understood, impossible within reasonable time (hundreds of years) to settle whether the measure reflects a strict transversal motion, a strict rotational one, or perhaps a combination of both.

•   We must have very detailed measuring information if any further settlement is possible in this text. What we know: the level of information from modern corridors does not include such type of specifications (only reserved for the actual researching group). Maybe they know how to close the case.

 

 

See more details from The ANDROMEDA Test.

 

BACK TO THE SAND GRAIN QUEST

 

 

See partly English translated in SandOrigin.

 

THE PROBLEM (DARK MATTER) is known in modern academy as ”the missing mass”; More mass is needed to explain the mutual behavior of the galaxies than the visual mass can explain. TNED calculations include a solution »by automation» (VISIBLE AND TOTAL MASS).

 

The cited text tells that SAND would also be a solution to the problem in modern corridors (see also Wikipedia quote in CosmicDust) — if only somebody knew how it was made. Compare TNED on the general neutron nuclear matrix in KOLMATRISEN — on the simple principle of CAP (concentric atomic production) — »It’s TNED» (again).

 

THE FUNCTION OF THE MAJOR (SAND) MASS TAKES CONTOUR:

— As the divergence direction is directed from the divergence’s rim into, towards, the K-cell’s inner, the ejected waste mass (sand) preferentially is or can so be understood to be pushed towards the inner K-cell parts, thereby building a higher central density.

 

Returning (DENSITYin) to the four constructive candidates,

 

TestEQ:

 

the additionally huge majority (sand) mass between the galaxies themselves offer a direct possible explanation (to the TNED suggested constellation Milky Way versus Andromeda):

 

ANDROMEDA ¦         a(c/c0)              •                        b(c/c0)              ¦ MILKY WAY— measures k(c/c0) to Andromeda

—————————————————————————————————————————————————

•   The simple testing equation: (ITEM):

1(Kcenter) – a + b = k = GRAVITATIONAL Doppler Blue From Andromeda to Milky Way (center)

 

LIGHT’S GRAVITATIONAL DEPENDENCY — Cheops hyperbolic solutions — from original CHEOPS RECTANGLE math bd=h²

 PRIMvFORM

The static part. See also MAC in Fig.1 — Divergence constanrt c0 = 2.99792458 T8 M/S is conserved independent of gravitation — the neutron: h=mcr

 

type 1 = gBLUEk(c/c0=0.91) + gBLUEa(c/c0=0.99) – gBLUEb(c/c0=0.9)

1(Kcenter) – a = k – b ¦ 1(Kcenter) + b = k + a ¦ 1(Kcenter) – k = a – b

 

must have a and b as defined by a local density of SUCH a magnitude as to resolve the actual (k) Doppler blue shift value ON

 

 ANDROMEDA          d = 2.13 T22 M           MILKY-WAY

 

 

SOURCE: BA1978 — Cambridge International Astronomy 1977/78 — Kpc = 1000pc — 1pc = 3.08568 T16 M

 

 

 

•   Andromeda galaxy must lie slightly closer to K-cell center reading »less gravitational red»;

   If the reader has other suggestions, please share.

•   Milky Way galaxy must lie slightly farther away from K-cell center reading »more gravitational red»;

•   With the given distance between Milky and Andro d = 2.13 T22 M (690 Kpc) their halfway must be less to Andro, more to Milky.

•   We have to iterate a testing solution value in order to arrive at »the actual Doppler observed value».

   There are some (leading dynamical, physical) arguments to how, what and why. Apart from those already mentioned, we will touch on that in the following.

 

WE WILL HAVE TO INCLUDE A DENSITY PARAMETER IN OUR ITERATIVE EXPEDITION

 

The more central mass m2 enveloped in r from g-center, the deeper Gravitational Doppler Red effect. So a density ρ=D test is imperative here.

— WHICH WILL REVEAL and introduce imperative ONSETS TO A CRITICAL STUDY ON RESULTS AND THE ACTUALLY KNOWN OBSERVATIONS

WHAT TYPE DENSITY IS DEMANDED?

FOR A TNED GRAVITATIONAL DOPPLER VALUE SOLUTION

with the general K-cell mean total density at present 20.82 Gy: 1.658 t26 KG/M³

ITM: UNIsand

IN MODERN CORRIDORS A

GENERAL UNIVERSAL GRAVITATIONAL DOPPLER SHIFT

HAS NO SAY. Here we test it — very.

Wkipedia2021DATA:

Wikipedia @INTERNET on Andromeda galaxy (15Dec2021)

———————————————————————————————————————————————

”Collision with the Milky Way

The Andromeda Galaxy is approaching the Milky Way at about 110 kilometers per second ..

It has been measured approaching relative to the Sun at around 300 km/s .. as the Sun orbits around the center of the galaxy at a speed approximately 225 km/s ..

.. and therefore it is expected to collide directly with the Milky Way in about 4 billion years.”.

———————————————————————————————————————————————

”v”/c0    Redshift: —0.0003669205 = 1.10 T5 / 2.99792458 T8; Andromeda to Milky Way: —110 ±1 KM/S;

c/c0           Blueshift: 1 — Red = 0.9996330795

Distance:  765 Kpc;

Mass Milky Way (Wikipedia, Dec2021): ................  (0.8-1.5) T12  · 1.98847 T30 KG = 2.982705 T42 KG

Mass Andromeeda (Wikipedia, Dec2021): ........... (1.5 ± 0.5) T12 · 1.98847 T30 KG = 2.982705 T42 KG

———————————————————————————————————————————————

Andromeda/Milky Way:

”The mass of either galaxy is difficult to estimate with any accuracy, but it was long thought that the Andromeda Galaxy is more massive than the Milky way by a margin of some 25% to 50%.

This has been called into question by a 2018 study ..”.

———————————————————————————————————————————————

Wikipedia @INTERNET on Andromeda—Milky Way collision (15Dec2021)

———————————————————————————————————————————————

”However, the lateral speed (measured as proper motion) is very difficult to measure with a precision to draw reasonable conclusions ..

.. researchers reported on using the Hubble Space Telescope to measure the positions of stars in the Andromeda in 2002 and 2010, relative to hundreds of background distant galaxies.

By averaging over thousands of stars they were able to obtain the average proper motion much better than one pixel accuracy”.

Cambridge1977DATA:

Cambridge International Astronomy 1977/1978 — BA1978s361

English: ”.. the extra galactic astronomy is certainly tormented badly by problems in concern of the interpretation of redshifts and the work on measuring wide objects”.

 

COMPILED DATA FROM BONNIER’S ASTRONOMI [BA1978] — Swedish version of Cambridge International Astronomy 1977

Compare [shortform]: Wikipedia2021DATA.

ITEM:

— Based on exactly the same light signal Doppler observations — with possibly dramatically different interpretations.

———————————————————

1 – a + b = k ¦ 1 – k = a – b ¦  b = a – [ 1 + k  ]:

ITERATION METHOD — The Great Andromeda Test

— .. No .. you don’t say ..

 

 

•   k = the corresponding measured/observed Doppler c/c0=k:

•   We TEST an Andromeda — closest to K-center — position Ra < 2.13 T22 M/2 to create

a testable fictitious regional space density mass

m = (Ra/G)c02(1 – [2c/c0] – 1)2/4 from the TNED derived STATIC Light’s gravitational dependency c/c0

with the gravitational potential w2=Gm/Ra in

 

 

 

THERE we iterate on an (a=c/c0( factor (0.99... from an onset for Ra)

giving a local density

•   D = m/V = 3m/(4πRa3) with a resulting

•   (b=c/c0)  = a – [ 1+ k ]

AND WE CONTINUE ON THAT ROUTE

•   until the difference (c/c0=a) – (b=c/c0) = 0 with a full spread sheet fifteen decimals meaning

—————————————

(a=c/c0) – (1 – k) – (b=c/c0) = 0

—————————————

•   a – b – 1 + k = 0 ;     

•   a – b = 1 – k (the actual doppler figure normally given, type ”1-0.999082699” = 0.000917301 = ”DopplerBlue”).

•   The answer will be in a and b from the tested Ra and resulting

Rb        = 2.13 T22M – Ra

when — if at all — a – b – 1 + k = 0.

— We don’t care about the masses of the objects at the testing point of investigation, only the surrounding masses mass densities wherein the objects reside (then afterwards we can consult reasonable actual masses — in  general the local mass density should lie close to the actually iterated mean mass values as limited to their corresponding galactic disc diameters, or possibly close to their spherical average).

 

MilkyWayReferences: D = m/V

FIRST — FOR FURTHER DIRECT COMPARISON AND REFERENCE:

We use the 1977/78 Cambridge International Astronomy values for a first reference — along with TNED results:

———————————————————————————————

the general K-cell mean total density at present 20.82 Gy: 1.658 t26 KG/M³

 

 

FM1975 ¦ BA1978 (Cambridge International Astronomy). Basic reference data on our Milky Way galaxy. We also use a 1mM³ grain of sand for further practical comparing, along with others — the sand issue will be returned to in specific.

 

 

— Milky Way interstellar density is (BA1978s259 uses unspecified ”atom” per volume unit, we apply atom = 1 hydrogen atom 1,67 T27 KG) around 1.5 t21 KG/M³. The Milky Way itself (the actual main disc) is specified (BA1978) ”1.4 T11 Solar masses” (mS ~ 1.989 T30 KG), = 2.8 T41 KG, diameter  ~ 30 Kpc, a sphere with volume 4.15 T62 M³, with a mean (not fair) density 6.7 t22 KG/M³; BA1978s324 specifies a rough ”interstellar medium in Milky Way” density of 2 t21 KG/M² — comparing a general all matter spread out over »the entire universe» by the figure 2 t28 KG/M³. (Wikipedia Dec2021 has poor [no direct simple MKSA international system] values to show on the Milky Way article).

— The density issue (KCHIP) is imperative in TNED cosmology — for clarifying how and why the K-cell expansion ceases and returns on a contractive phase: the K-cell center inevitably must collect a higher degree of mass during the expansion period, causing the expanding velocity to halt (after 336Gy says TNED). The only rational explanation for such physics (TNED says) is huge amounts of sand grains (general Earth like crust matter: Si, Mg, Al, Fe and others with some organic parts included, see neutron nuclear matrices) from the primary (concentric atomic production CAP) ejections. COMPARE:

 

 

———————————————

CAP ¦ Primary distribution of elements inside Earth ¦ DIAsquare ¦ BaseCHART ¦ CELESTIAL bodies building time — from Dmax to Dnormal¦ Modern academy: ”water from the outer”

 

 

(Except the quote from BA1978). Modern corridors mentions not even the sand grain possibility — type one single grain 1mM³ per many cubic kilometer empty space — easily overriding the visual mass. See in explicit special treatise in Dark matter light emitting capacity.

 

ITMresults: ITM

THE ITERATING RESULTS

 

WITH a lowest possible central K-cell density (6.56 t22 KG/M³ — near Milky Way’s spherical mean) the result points out — to our somewhat astonishing surprise: the easy proof of it — that The Andromeda Galaxy strongly could be interpreted as THE K-cell center or very close to such a center.

— The Andromeda galaxy is (BA1978s315Tabell15.3) estimated about twice the Milky Way galaxy mass — with a surrounding additional set of smaller Andromeda companion galaxies and clusters — way far more bright and with a more prominent central massif of followers than our Milky Way (Wikipedia, Local Group has galactic charts with illustrations).

 

As the innermost central point of the K-cell center never is dark, always electromagnetically active independent of K-cell expansions and contractions

— gravitational potential = zero:

•   The Andromeda Galaxy — as a consequence — should be a PERMANENTLY ASSOCIATED REGION with the innermost K-cell center:

•   The innermost K-cell region is always electromagnetically active (r0c static connection; G-factors):

— IF the Andromeda test result holds, the Andromeda galaxy region could obviously be interpreted as REMNANTS after the initial detonation from that hot innermost »eternal cosmic center» — if no disclaiming argument arrive:

— If that is so: When we look at the Andromeda form, part and light, we look at something really, really old :

•   ”eternal bright”. That is something ”new” — if at all.

 

 

The results strongly indicate that the TNED deduced K-cell center — g-center of the universe — lies (very) close to (or is the) Andromeda galaxy.

THE TNED RELATED GRAVITATIONAL DOPPLER ANDROMEDA TEST 10Dec2021 — excluded in modern academic corridors for the universe in general, but adopted (with limits, see Fig.1) in modern corridors for single local massive bodies meaning: this type test is ”forbidden” in modern quarters:

 

Kpc = 1000pc, see DIER.

 

The different Andromeda velocity-distance values from the Cambridge1977-Wikipedia2021 sources –275KM/S¦2.13T22M-–110KM/S¦2.36T22M cancel on the same net iterative result on lowest density as compiled in the figure below and the following parametric details from the 10Dec2021 Andromeda test:

 

 

The (orange) high density results with low local divergence (type 0.55) are excluded (here) as relevant candidated due to their low suggested principle electrodynamics. It is assumed that our position in the TNED K-cell universe lies close to an ideal c/c0=1. Which favours only those test results exposing c/c0 values type 0.9999.. .

 

EarthMass2021IAU.ods Tabell3¦K100

— EXCON 4 — static conditions in the neighborhood?

— Yes. That is what it seems to work on.

•   PROGRAM LIMIT: this test result is yet unfinished: The fifteen iterative testing decimals refuse further resolution — with the left unsolved precision. We need computer programming features with higher numerical capacity than the available in OpenOffice, EXCEL, etc. IF, as suggested — 0.99999999... — Andromeda galaxy g-center IS the K-cell center.

•   Wikipedia figures, see quote in ITM.

 

EarthMass2021IAU.ods Tabell3¦X98

 

 

No14¦15: The M¦SPH[a+b]/2 value with ÷2 replaced by ÷1.8195 gives a mass ratio of (exactly) 355. It exemplifies the possible (tight) density definition leading to »exact results».

 

IN SPECIFIC — »EXCON ¦ 1» — we find that applying the expanding-contracting gravitational Doppler math ON the here assumedByTest K-cell central Milky Way and Andromeda galactic groups, leads us to a quite different end station density and MASS RATIO result while the 3.241 Kpc end result is not affected:

— the mass ratio M¦SPH[a+b]/2 ÷ LocalGalacticGroup then becomes:

 

 

— EXCON 1?

— Na .. . I would not count on that one . On the other hand: Precise data on the level of galaxies is no easy Sunday puzzle. Very difficult expedition.

mVIZ:

The basic TNED deductions on the K-cell Heat physics accounts for a general K-cell/Universe mass ratio mVIZ/mK = 1/355 — derived from the constant LQ²: consuming mass to heat and light means consuming (Q) electric charge — meaning that (L) INDUCTANCE increases. See specific deduction i mVIZ ¦ mK/mVIZ ¦ Tfactor.

•   267/355=75%;  1069/355= 301%.

— THE ARGUMENT for a STATIC condition in the K-cell center region (Milky Way and Andromeda) — assuming a defined K-cell center at present TNED deduced K-cell age 20.82Gy, the actual Milky Way and Andromeda reported data —  is (KCHIPstart¦KCHIP) that the K-cell central region by 20.82Gy already has reached a state of density equilibrium where no further density distribution changes occur. That situation clearly applies to a STATIC gravitational Doppler situation.

 

•   The TNED central majority (355mVIZ) of ”dark matter” mass uses the simple explaining type (compare ”sand origin” quote in modern quarters from BA1978):

 

— Sand grains can occupy the great spaces of void in our universe — with hundreds of kilometers cubic average mean distance spaces between and outside the more prominent local mass objects (gas, stars, star clusters, galaxies).

— Its general ”fill” (COSMIC SAND ORIGIN IN TNED COSMOLOGY) can only have one source: The main ejected WASTE when stars and planets are born out of expanding primary J-bodies.

   With one 1mM³ sand grain per hundreds of kilometer cubic sides, no astronomical instrument will EVER exist to detect such occurrences — what we know.

— The sand argument WOULD also be plausible in modern corridors — IF A THEORY FOR THE MAKING WOULD EXIST. It doesn’t, as the quote certifies.

— That standpoint certifies the lower mass ratio result (which ”in fact” would be the TNED deduced 355 »on more precise Andromeda data». But we don’t know that here).

   The Wikipedia quote (ITM) ”The mass of either galaxy is difficult to estimate with any accuracy” also certifies the general difficulty in specifying accurate values of mass (and distance) on the galactic level. With some minor adjustments we would (easily) arrive at the TNED decided figures — also equally difficult to prove by any exact definition.

 

•   The Cambridge 1978...........   source gives the K-center Andromeda position at 1/212 relative the Andromeda-Milky Way distance 2.13 T22 M.

•   The Wikipedia 2021 ..........   source gives the K-center Andromeda position at 1/235 relative the Andromeda-Milky Way distance 2.36 T22 M.

— Results with the type Highest Density are excluded here because of the low local divergence of type 0.5 (meaning dynamics halved: see TAT, absolute metrics).

— See also POSSIBLE Andromeda-Milky Way CONSTELLATION CONSTRUCT in DENSITYin.

 

 

It is less (physically by dynamics) likely that the — highly — higher density value (t19 KG/M³) is the one representative for the real natural answer:

 

•   A gravitational Doppler value near ½c0 ruins the full physical dynamical performance in matter as such;

•   Also note that the ATOMIC TIME factor — see The Absolute Metrics — follows the gravitational potential (light-frequency gravitational dependency) with the (peculiar — still no relativistic mingling) consequence that

•   WHEREVER WE are in the K-cell universe any physical (electromagnetic) measure on local c gives the top value c0. But regions with lower c — higher g-potential — takes longer time to develop with standards compared to regions with less g-potential. That is: the closer to the K-cell center, the more optional is physical dynamics — says TNED (Light physics gravitational dependency).

•   IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TIME ITSELF — ONLY ELECTRODYNAMICS EFFICIENCY PREFERENCES

•   Planck Equivalents — not relativity theory: it forbids the TNED deduced K-cell physics. Compare the different theories and their limits in Fig.1.

 

 

ANDROMEDA RADIAL TEST RESULT (See also AndromedaLATERAL):

ONLY BY THAT ARGUMENT: ANDROMEDA GALAXY HAS ESTABLISHED A most highly possible K-CELL CENTER — in TNED cosmology (10Dec2021)

•   a test defined local as present (20.82Gy) density practically the same as (MWR) our Milky Way mean SPHERICAL one: (2-)6 t22 KG/M³

— while a TNED general calculated K-cell mean density @present20.82Gy (TNED K-cell math) of 1.658 t26 KG/M³.

 

EarthMass2021IAU.ods Tabell3¦A50

 

 

Note that m¦KG ”inside Kc” mass value in this general calculus card is based on an average mean density D = 1.658 t26 KG/M³ from the actual K-cell sphere at present 20.82 Gy — with no possible aspects taken on the more prominent inner K-cell density distribution as in the Andromeda test[‡].

— See density explained result in AndTER.

— We don’t know by mathematics how (yet — if at all) the density distribution changes towards the outer rim from center: We would have to alter the simple basic equations for such results — and test them to actual observations.

 

 : 0 for basic math; 1 for additional value tests on the v-parameter. Inner marked rectangle calculates the divergence detail from center to d¦M=maxR.

 : 1 fot time units in Gy = 1 T9 y; 0 in seconds: tMIN = tOFFSET = 0.000198226014336 S on Dmax = 1.82 T17 KG/M³.

 

ARE THEY AT REST?

 

•   The TNED cosmological gravitational Doppler RADIAL Andromeda test definitely and strongly suggest that Milky Way and Andromeda have no mutual radial = shortest distance changing motion.

•   The AndromedaLATERAL overview leaves the question open for the actuallly involved reseachers:

— The Question is raised wheather the reported results should be interpreted as a direct radially right angle motion, or as a (corresponding) result of a small rotation of Milky Way around the Andromeda galaxy as — the TNED test suggests — a practical K-cell centre.

 

— So it seems, TNED says — with a small Milky Way rotation around the Andromeda galaxy cluster. But the interpretation of the (hard to get at) lateral aspect may change this resolution.

 

Both Andromeda and Milky Way have satellite galaxies rotating around them, as it seems. But relative each other — if this Gravitational Doppler test is the only physical activity in the area — they have no other Doppler components:

 

 Explained in DENSITYin.

 

— Yes. They are at rest, TNED Gravitational Doppler effect says — with Andromeda galaxy (very) close to the TNED deduced K-cell center. No collision will occur — ever.

 

SandEX:

•   m2 is the central actually (visual + any eventual dark or hidden) star gravitating mass:

•   At great distances from the actual thermonuclear reaction center (StarANVIL in TNED ¦ TNED/MAC) the pe factor is negligible. That leaves us with the remaining p-factor — which after some (deduction) reckoning arrives at the simple balancing equivalent  r =  R√ m/4πm :

 

The TNED deduced Thermonuclear radiation pressure — not the electro-kinetic modern counterpart[‡] — has no modern academic representation:

 

R cubic side of sand grain; r distance from (galaxy center) thermonuclear reaction center ; m the physical (not only the visual) actually gravitating mass of the (galaxy center) thermonuclear reaction center ; m grain mass;

— R = (m/D)1/3; sand (Quartz, SiO3 has D = 2320 KG/M³): Rcube = (m/2320)1/3

•   Sand grains lighter than m are guaranteed to keep out of the galactic sphere (r) on credit of the central/total galactic nuclear radiation pressure.

— A cubic R=1mM³ grain of sand has mass m = 2.323 t6 KG.

   Taking the ideal worst case TNED calculated general K-cell mass ratio mVIZ/mK = 1/355, given a round Milky Way mass (Cam1977) 2 T41 KG, the equilibrium is satisfied where (the Milky Way galaxy disc diameter is 30 Kpc)

 

Rcube   = (m/[DQuartz=2320KG/M³])1/3

r            =  (0.001 M)√ (355×2 T41 KG)/4π(2.323 t6 KG)

             = √ [DQuartz=2320KG/M³]–2/3[m=2.323 t6 KG]–1/3(355×2 T41 KG)/4π(2.323 t6 KG)

             = 1.56 022313170679 T21 M = 50.563 3883584669 Kpc

 

Number of such m-grains for one m’(MilkyWay2T41KG):

 

Nc         = m’/m = 8.6095566078347 T46

 

IF these grains with evenly separated spaces would fill an entire Ø30Kpc sphere enveloping the Milky Way galaxy, the mean average distance between each grain of sand would be

 

CUBEs = [(4π/3)(30Kpc/2)3/Nc]1/3

             = 168.970 572960352 KM

 

As radially pushed outside the Ø30Kpc sphere, the thickness of such a shell with density

D = 2.323 t6KG/(168.97 KM)² = 1.37 479 559860703 t11 KG/M³ would be (ShellTHICK)

V = mΣ/D = m’MILKY/D = V(MILKY) = (4π/3)(30Kpc/2)3 = 4.153 498 09898697 T62 M³

V = Vout – Vin = (4π/3)(Rout³ – Rin³) ;  V/(4π/3) = (Rout³ – Rin³) ; 

Rout³ = V/(4π/3) + Rin³ = (8.013 03745475883 T20 M)³ ;

ShellTHICK = Rout – (Rin = 15Kpc) = 3.38 452110421585 T20 M = 10.968 4859506399 Kpc.

 

This result can be compared with the corresponding TNED deduced (Radiation pressure’s force equivalent RPFE — Thermonuclear Radiation Pressure TRP):

•   The thermonuclear pressure FUNCTION — it has an INDUCTIVE feature — takes on any electrically charged mass — even the neutral sand grain’s outer (Casimir) electron cloud agents. Ideally we (hence) can calculate the molecular atomic Z (nuclear charge) parameter on summing the individual atoms Z. For Quartz SiO2 it is 14+8+8=30.

— The corresponding °K temperature in our 1mM³ sand grain example resident on 15Kpc distance from an ideal Milky Way central 2 T41 KG light producing mass is: 75 °K:

 

EarthMass2021IAU.ods Tabell3¦H82 — part of inner cell blocks

 

 

T = √  F/(30 × 8.54859 t22 × √[c/c0]) ......... = 75 °K: what we know: a reasonable physical result

•   NOTE that T here has only relevant physical meaning from light produced by NUCLEAR reactions — TNED says.

— With an alternative r = 450Kpc the temperature arrives at T=2.5°K (general cosmic background radiation temperature). No aspects taken on the other parameters. Just as an illustrative example of the TNED deduced connections capabilities.

 

•   One single 1mM³ grain of sand in a mean average space cube with side 169 KM (type Philadelphia-New York) is — what we know — not possible even here on Earth (air) to get a specific spot on. The less so outside a galaxy; »Mission Impossible». The K-cell spaces are huge.

 

   Depending on local mass ratio (mVIZ/m) corresponding calculations arrive at corresponding possible sand grain distributions — summing possible several hundreds of galactic masses over the vast (3Mpc average) intergalactic spaces. At the present (Dec2021) we have no exact information — other than the TNED deduced and claimed mathematical physics, further to be tested.

 

So:

NOTE THE DENSITY PROBLEM on the modern academic idea of ”dark matter”. See Cambridge International Astronomy Quote; The general TNED deduced K-cell mass ratio mVIZ/mK=1/355 in the TNED radial Andromeda test has a (lowest) corresponding local ratio of 1/267. It is — TNED says — the huge amount of ejected waste from the primary J-body formations on sand grain: general universal debris between the galactic clusters — which has no theory of composition in modern quarters. Depending on grain size (Example in MMLightMAC), the TNED deduced thermonuclear radiation pressure (not the electro-kinetic modern counterpart[‡]) pushes surrounding (sand) debris out from the actual galactic regions (TNED applications in THERMONUCLEAR RADIATION PRESSURE’S FORCING IONIZATION EQUIVALENT ¦ CORONA PHYSICS ¦ SOLAR WIND):

•   The electrically neutral silicon type debris grain material — with hundreds of kilometers of cubic spaces between nearby single grains — is forced to reside between the visually observable main galactic masses — with no possible instrumental method of (ever) being detected (the Quote).

— So: THE ACTUAL GRAVITATIONAL DOPPLER EFFECT — affection — is RULED by these (TNED says) sand collected enormous masses. Compared to the actually observable visual ones, these are practically ”negligible”. Testing the TNED gravitational results, we have to take these aspects seriously into account:

•   Simple mass-gravitation calculations on the actual galaxy masses will NOT lead to relevant explanations — says TNED.

 

 

•   They are obviously in that case in an inner K-cell gravitational equilibrium (see SAND ORIGIN) — forming a possible perfect stationary platform for measuring all other electromagnetically visible Doppler objects in our universe.

•   IF the conclusion is correct on the SITE of Andromeda — K-center — even the smallest move of our Milky Way should expose some extra Doppler motional value. As that MIGHT be the case in the AndromedaLATERAL issue — provided Andromeda stays put at the K-center — the case is closed and settled:

•   Milky Way is possibly at rest relative the Andromeda region — with a possible (the tricky lateral interpretation) small rotation around the Andromeda/K-cell center mass region.

   A perfect best dream type of occasion for (very) exact accurate light measuring tests.

 

AndTER: ITMres

All units in TNED are given as a MKSA international standard (MKSA basic, MKSA history) unless otherwise noted

THE ANDROMEDA TEST RESULT:

vEscape/3=vKcellRIM

 

The TNED K-cell derived (Kc0H) expansion velocity has the basic simple form vK = (4Gm/t)1/3/3 = (4Gm/27)1/3/t1/3 with the K-cell mass m = 4.16 T53 KG; IT NEVER STOPS. The time (t) 1/t1/3 function extends endlessly without ever reaching a zero point.

•   That expression of the K-cell pacing is based on equal gravitational energies: a contractive impact with a resulting ejected expansive recoil (K-cell Detonation).

•   There are also minor losses (some 0.7%) in the K-cell expansive period from stars consuming mass for heat and light (as calculated from comparing our Sun’s energy transfer).

•   However, it is the (KCHIP) inner expanding J-bodies on their gravitational K-center favor — by physical principle — that secures a halt moment for the expansion. The K-cell heat physics principle builds on that inner expanding action — but it has no (yet) specific mathematical formulation except a general K-cell Heat Physics history.

— In TNED physics it is the K-cell surrounding c0-body (endless supply of electromagnetically dormant neutrons, never included as such in the K-cell mass physics history — certified by the General State Equation’s energy account) that fills in these (0.7%) mass-energy vacancies when expansion turns to contraction. THAT the basic relation between the K-cell expanding velocity vK and the general escape velocity vE expression shows the latter 3 times greater at all times — see vESCdiv3 — has no relevance because the vE form is based on a STATIC density preserved center mass property — while the K-cell is an expanding entity. These cannot be compared dynamically.

•   The (mathematical/practical) result of the 10Dec2021 Andromeda test further aligns with these results;

 

CENTRAL DENSITY INCREASE (20.82Gy) VERIFIED:

Cambride1977DATA.

K-cell density D=m/V (TNED derived from the gravitational energy Gm²/r and the Kepler Momentum K =A/t) presents an ideal homogeneous density value over the whole K-cell sphere — at each given moment of time (t). That is: a constant density distribution — straight horizontal line — »all over the place» — at all times. Nothing in That D-value says anything about the inner distribution of matter: its actual morphology (formative contours). In TNED K-cell mathematics, it is imperative (KCHIP) that — IF the K-cell mass expansion shall stop and return to a contractive phase — the K-cell center will experience some density increase relative a lower density at the K-cell rim during the expansion period. Such a higher density concentration at the center will certify that the gravity pull from the higher mass concentration slows down on the farthest regions, forcing them to a halt condition (KCHIPstart).

•   Any corresponding K-cell escape velocity parameter (vE = √2Gm/r) is then definitely compromised, and the object will begin a drop down history.

— The 10Dec2021 Andromeda Test has presented — or strongly suggested — such an imperative factor in favor to the TNED cosmologically derived K-cell Heat Physics. It is the dotted line between the blue and orange in the illustration above: Higher in (DENSITYin), lower out: »soft break». Theoretically, the dynamics are (hence) already clear from the TNED deductions.

— We needed some (density) proof based on actual (Doppler) physical instrumental measures. Now (10Dec2021) such a proof is suggested by the result of the Andromeda test.

 

 

The TNED cosmological 10Dec2021 K-CELL suggested

ANDROMEDA PROOF (The ANDROMEDA TEST)

strongly suggests THAT

 

•   The inner Andromeda-Milky Way regional K-cell density

(2.1-)6.5 t22 KG/M³ — (MWR) near the actual Ø30Kpc spherical Milky Way average density —

is profoundly (roughly four ten powers) higher than the general basic average 20.82Gy total NOW K-cell density

1.66 t26 KG/M³ — as calculated by TNED cosmology from the K-cell Heat Physics complex.

 

MEANING — at present K-cell age 20.82Gy according to TNED calculations:

— Relative the general K-cell mean average constant density

— as the K-cell expands taken by max radius versus K-cell mass (4.16 T53 KG)

— the inner K-cell region around Andromeda and Milky Way galaxies (2.13-2.36 T22 M, their separation distance taken by spherical radius) has a profoundly higher, more centrally pushed density than the average K-cell density.

MEANING:

 

•   A strong indicative proof exists of (KCHIP) that the TNED deduced K-cell density develops (from start) a higher inner density along with its expansion:

MEANING:

•   The K-cell experiences (KCHIP — already from square one) a slowing down end station arrival: the expansion is halted (336Gy ¦ K-cell AGE); The K-cell mass returns to contraction with a new expanding period — provided the 10Dec2021 Andromeda test proof also IS genuine.

 

BACKGROUND (The Ecological Universe ¦ Universe’s critical density):

— TNED cosmological mathematics has (had) serious issues in trying to give strict mathematical proof for a K-cell density central increase as the K-cell continues its expansion history. Several attempts have been accomplished through the years — all with one and the same short: it is theoretical.

 

•   We needed some solid proof for an inner higher K-cell density — founded on some actual (Doppler) measures.

 

— The 10Dec2021 Andromeda test result entered the scene and gave us A POSSIBLE, EVEN STRONG, one — although the test was not aimed at anything at all in concern of density issues: it came as a bonus (we always get credit for trying ..).

 

 

 

 

MARANA:

 

THE MASS RING ANALOGY

GRAVITATION INSIDE SPHERICAL SHELLS

 

 

 

 

An early study (author’s archive from 1983) with one ball inside a ring of surrounding balls, left illustration part, showed by gravity force vector addition the typical elliptic vector collecting shape with all the contributions from the surrounding equally spaced and equally physical mass balls: Least from above. Most from below the central horizontal ring line. The right side of the illustration summarizes the calculating result:

•   A growing number of surrounding balls focuses the attracting force with growing magnitude to the lower part of the ring.

— Nearest ring side takes the ball.

 

    

 

The simple mass ring analogy can (easily — by thought multiple rings) be transfered to a hollow spherical analogy by projection:

— Taking the given ring’s vector contributions from its turning (showing an ellipse) around the vertical central line, resembles the addition of vector contributions on any spherical corresponding sum of rings (with evenly spaced individual mass points).

   The summing impression says that a single mass left alone inside a hollow (density homogeneous) sphere will be attracted to that side of the inner spherical wall to which the central ball shows a deviating position.

 

 

 

 

SIU:

 

MATHEMATICS is not the problem.

— Problem is using its content — by deduction. Zero invention: Talk to me. Say something intelligent.

 

SAND IN UNIVERSE — by TNED

 

In TNED cosmology quite other conditions reside — compare initial quote fråm Wikipedia on Cosmic Dust.

•   The deduced and derived TNED CAP (concentric atomic production) from the CWON (complete whole number solutions) isotopic revelations and their mutually certified (MATIK) Earth crust and atmosphere basics (basic netron nuclear matrices)

 

 

———————————————

jH2O ¦ BioGAS ¦ BioEK1-10 ¦ TheTEN ¦ AR123 ¦ CWON ¦ CAP ¦ MATIK — NEUTRON NUCLEAR PRIMARY BIOCHEMICAL MATRICES¦ THE PERIODIC SYSTEM ¦ Inner distribution of elements

 

leave no doubt about the (simple) possible TNED cosmological arrangements:

•   The primary J-bodie’s surfaces SERVES THE PURPOSE during their initial morphological chemical formations following the short and powerful fusion phase.

 

    CORE CHEMICAL MATRICES — cosmic assembly

 

Central molecular morphology — only difference: Chlorophyll — imperative insolation energy agent for development of all life: Leaf&Needle — has a Magnesium atom at it center, while Hemoglobin has an Iron atom (Source FM1975: KloHem).

 

 

———————————————

CAP ¦ Primary distribution of elements inside Earth ¦ DIAsquare ¦ BaseCHART ¦ CELESTIAL bodies building time — from Dmax to Dnormal¦ Modern academy: ”water from the outer”

 

 

In modern academic theory, these possibilities are completely absent — all because modern academy never got to THE DEDUCTION OF (the electric charge Q and) THE ATOMIC NUCLEUS — TNED: Planck constant h=mcr; the neutron: gravitation’s fundamental form: gravitating mass, and how it works.

 

SAND: Sand in Universe

SAND

 

Especially the heavier primary J-bodies — wasting enormous amounts av ”debris” — type cosmic dust and grain particles (mM sand grains) containing roughly 5-10 T19 individual atoms in one single small 0.5-1 mM packages — have specific surface ejecting potential for producing grain mineralogical material of type sand (type common Earth eroded and weathered crust matter) during the primary body formation.

 

TNED EXAMPLES OF COMPRESSED Primary CHEMICAL-NUCLEAR-NEUTRON MATRIX SYSTEMS of type SAND

————————————————————————————————————————————————————

•   Single electromagnetically dormant neutrons  are packed tight in primary K-cell detonated ejected J-bodies:

•   On electromagnetic activation (The DIER) a neutron decay (normally 12-14 minutes) on a morphological forcing (negative magnetic moment) procedure possibly arranges the tightly packed neutrons in a basic (seen down from above at a J-body surface) of (here named »basic carbon neutron nuclear matrix») completely plane filling pattern with no vacant spaces, as suggested:

 

 

This matrix — depending on conditions determined by the J-body’s mass (and its eventual gravitational interfering with other near J bodies) — decides itself its own private morphological structure — with in principle unlimited combinations leading to single atoms or chemically composed atomic system blocks (molecules):

•   Each layer, a spherical J-body shell, will have, or receive, a common nuclear decay (time) window from which the tightly lying neutron decayed now hydrogen nuclei will begin heavy and fast exothermal fusion processes — as long as there are adjacent nuclei inside of each others nuclear barrier (in TNED meaning inside the toroid’s own circumscribed sphere: details from Fusion Ring).

 

 

•   The TNED two basic atomic/nuclear equations guarantee that the electron masses from the decays always exist in the vicinity.

Meaning: They are there, ready to fill out the space vacancies — appearing all together as new atomic nuclei are formed on neutralizing otherwise repelling electric forces between the newly produced atomic nuclei.

   The process certifies a direct most tight possible chemical material bond between any accepted new near chemically co-working atoms. Such as (simplest examples SiO2 — Quartz molecules in »endless» plane filling paragons)

 

 

IF such a neutron nuclear molecular matrix exists on a primary developing  J-body’s surface, and the ejected force from the introducing fusion phase is powerful enough for that specific J-body, individual grains — microscopic to visual — have the possibility to form individual projectile objects with (very — very) high initial velocity. That is the TNED cosmic scenario in part in this (CAP — concentric atomic production) treatise.

 

———————————————

CAP ¦ Primary distribution of elements inside Earth ¦ DIAsquare ¦ BaseCHART ¦ CELESTIAL bodies building time — from Dmax to Dnormal¦ Modern academy: ”water from the outer”

MAC, modern academy: no atomic nucleus (Planck constant h=mcr: the neutron) deduction. TNED, Related physics: it is imperative. All of it.

 

collecting/resolving QUARTZ Silicon Dioxide (as long as the warehouse has the material components).

— NOTE that there are several (MANY) ways to COMBINE the neutrons in a specific morphologic connection (giving alternative paragon views): The structures here are only those most simple and direct (to the author, at the present).

 

 

SOME EXAMPLES OF HOW VARYING ASSEMBLY FORMATION ON THE SAME ATOMIC COMPONENTS SiO2 EXPOSE DIFFERENT END MOLECULAR MATRICES (introducing possible mixtures .. on other near layers):

Straight vertical-horizontal — with possible hollow vacancies »for other complementary»:

 

 

— We see that EASILY MANY SiO2 molecules could be produced this way — over entire J-body spherical neutron shell layers. Once they have formed a chemical bond from this most tight origin, no present available force exist to tear them apart.

— If you know the chemical formula — make your own archive of possible candidates — provided an appropriate computer picture handling program (Microsoft has none except the old Paintbrush from Windows 3.1 which The New Microsoft after Bill Gates killed, too — this author had to make his own through the years [»stupid Microsoft and other programmers killed assembler and pixels .. zero computer knowledge fuckups .. after Bill Gates, the only reasonable Windows inventor working groups .. they gave us great hope on the future .. that the new Microsoft owners killed, effectively, harshly and brutally .. : they don’t even understand The Concept»]).

Mirror assembly horizontal extension — with no hollow vacancies »for other complementary»:

 

 

— »UnameIt, We’veGotIt».

QUARTZ SiO2

is known to be one of the most weathering-erosive resistant materials.

— OR possibly a more complex candidate .. (»calcium sand») WHITE SAND

— Calcium Carbonate CaCO3:

 

 

 

— The more different types of atoms in a single composed molecule, the more possible combinations to arrive at the same molecular end station — with possible mutually slight different inner atomic binding material structures.

 

That should be as close to the Stars (and their heavens) as we possibly could reach (»heaven on Earth» literally).

— SAND it was. No Problemo.

 

The next Issue on our Agenda would be:

— HOW DOES IT TRAVEL? See SandTRAVEL.

 

 

 

SandTRAVEL: Sand in universe ¦ UniverseSAND ¦ SAND ¦  

 

 

HOW DOES A POSSIBLE GRAIN OF SAND TRAVEL TO OUR REGIONS FROM A FAR AWAY SOURCE?

—  First; It has to fly fast, very fast — with a minimum cross section area, securing its intact form on arrival — unless crashed on the way in meeting others. We will math-test a typically J-body ejected type 1mM grain of Sand by TNED cosmological elementary equations. No big deal.

Overview:

 

Basic CHEOPS LIGHT-GRAVITATION MATH details ¦ K-cell Detonation ¦ Fig.1 — TNED, MAC, Einstein and Schwarzchild on LIGHT and GRAVITATION ¦

” .. foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world ..”: IF YOU CARE for my privacy, how come YOU interrupt me in my work without my permission? Out. Not one word:

— ALL — no exceptions — OTHER INDIVIDUAL ADDRESSING DEFINES EXERCISING OPPRESSION: not-freedom, not-justice, not-peace. Say again. Come again.

rVIZ:

— rVIZ?

— LIGHT from stars generate a Doppler red shift (K=1.5) during the K-cell expansion — forcing a limited visibility of normally resting objects. rVIZ is the corresponding RIM of that ideal universe's sphere — beyond which still stars do exist but whose light is shut down because of a (TNED combined) Doppler red shift + a general Gravitational redshift (modern academy's “dark energy”).

— As the redshift is stronger in the beginning than the end of the (gradually decreasing) expansion, more universe appears by time.

•   The rVIZ value 1025 Mpc comes from the (Oct2018) IAU test on Sun’s photometric effect — here (ResTAB ¦ SunMASS) further clarified by specific samples of the iteration method.

 

HOW TO NAVIGATE INSIDE THE K-CELL — TNED COSMOLOGY DERIVED UNIVERSE — K-CELL HEAT PHYSICS

Basic properties

 

K-cell Heat Physics ¦

 

Given the principle physical — strict cosmological — formation of sand (SAND)

IN RELATING THE POSSIBLE HISTORY OF ONE SINGLE GRAIN OF SAND possibly traveling from a location where stars and galaxies are born (TNED RELATED GRB OBJECTS: Origin ¦ Interpretation — echoes from dying or born?¦ ), finally arriving at Earth not only in our time of universal history, TNED cosmological basic math as illustrated forces a general limited time window:

•   Ejected debris (sand) is only actual from sites where stars and galaxies are born.

— As suggested in the illustration, this type of phenomena ends (TNED says) after 16.3Gy of K-cell expansion (the tPmax point of time).

c03p6: SandTRAVEL

 

y, Year ¦ Tt = 10↑± ¦ Gy = T9y; G prefix: Giga, billion — Ga, GigaYearAgo

————————————————————————

— Depending on velocity — lowest v=c — ejected debris will cease as a cosmo-logic phenomena some 11.7Gy ahead — TNED says.

— Possible (such) grains of sand reaching Earth today hence have a latest origin stamp event horizon of some 20.82–16.3=4.52Ga.

   Depending on ejected velocity (energy transfer when meeting Earth’s atmosphere) the traveling time 4.52Gy with a highest possible v from that last possible primary star birth region (4.52Ga) defines a that highest possible sand grain velocity by

 

(r@16.3Gy = 1.54 T26 M)/4.52Gy = 3.6c0     ;

highest possible sand grain velocity from latest possible region with primary birth of stars and galaxies — TNED cosmological deductions only

Grains with possible still higher velocity have already passed

 

IF such a (rare) 1mM³ m=2.32 t6 KG grain of sand impacts the Earth’s atmosphere, the ideal energy release  becomes

 

Ekin = mv²/2 = (2.32 t6 KG)(3.6c0)²/2 = 8.44 0187902486 T30 eV = 8.44 T24 MeV = 8.44 T18 GeV = 1.352 1181 T12 J

 

In LITERARY REFERENCES (ENCARTA 99 in Muons and Multiple c) established sources report a highest observed impact energy from cosmic radiation of type 1 T20 eV = 1 T11 GeV — a (very) small spouse to our rare 1mM³ sand grain.

 

The original TNED text in the Muon article uses the mass of a proton for comparison — leading to such huge velocities that even TNED cannot deduce them from the ejected (GRB) objects. See COSMIC PARTICLE RADIATION’S ORIGIN.

— The only possible TNED solution is the max 3.6c0 on a much smaller (corresponding) sand particle:

m = 2(E=1 T20 eV)/(max3.6c0)² = 2(16.02 J)/(3.6c0)² = 2.75 071819413256 t17 KG ;

With SiO2 [atomic weight U=60u] Quartz density D = 2320 KG/M³:

→ SandCUBEvolume   = m/D = 6.381 66621038753 t14 M³

→ SandCUBEside         = V1/3  = 3.996 17680746133 t5 M ~ 40µM

→ SandCUBEatoms     = m/Uu = 2.761 T8 SiO2 atomic groups

 

Possibly. And (very — rare) likely, TNED says.

— How is that — in detail?

•   TNED has a potential power to give the details — down to each specific electron.

 

FirstIssue: 3.6c0

First issue:

WHAT HAPPENS TO A GRAIN OF SAND — IN TNED COSMOLOGY — WHEN ITS MECHANICALLY CAUSED VELOCITY EXCEEDS THE LOCAL c-VALUE?

 

 

 

A treatise on the subject in TNED (Apr2007 MECHANIC-ELECTRIC CONNECTION) is as described in this illustration (THE MAGNETIC WINDOW):

•   The PRINCIPLE type of theory has no modern academic representation:

— Inside a closed electric circuit its providing local divergence (speed of light) certifies that no velocity higher than c can be given an object that is electrically accelerated on the system’s energy account.

•   Approaching the c-limit, a principal unlimited (K approaches infinity) amount of electrical energy (voltage) can be supported to the object, yet with practically no resulting higher velocity.

— The elongated (red) curve represents ”the classic mechanic type function” solution — without the practically limiting K factor.

 

Not included i modern quarters:

A MECHANICALLY ACCELERATED OBJECT has no connection to velocity restrictions associated with electricity (Light’s liberty clause in related physics: light connects not to kinetics). See also the deduction of the electric charge:

Q = √ (m/R)(A/dt) — where conflicting issues appear on Time and Temperature, this production uses t for time and T for temperature. The designation below should be for time:

 

 

•   In electro-physics Q is preserved independent of its (system-) relative change of mass (m) — BECAUSE the same proportional (accelerating) property accounts for the resistive factor (R) — see Planck Equivalents: m/R = constant.

•   In MECHANICS, no R exists — and therefore not one single scientific mechanical experiment exists showing otherwise:

— Neither m nor R is affected in kinetics. But this simple related physical foundation has no representation in modern corridors: modern academy cannot deduce Q — and cannot explain the mass increase phenomena in electro-physics.

 

ANSWER:

TwoMainPossibilities: FirstISSUE

All macroscopic electromagnetism becomes invisible: “hidden” on v>c:

 

 

TNED explains phenomena:

 

 

THERE ARE TWO MAIN POSSIBILITIES (TNED says):

————————————————————————

1.  The J-body neutron nuclear matrix (SAND) surface is ejected with such a pace that the neutron nuclear matrix divides into smaller neutron tight close microscopical neutron spheres traveling away so fast (v>c) that the normal macroscopic electromagnetism NEVER gets a chance to develop a conventional neutron decay:

•   The Dmax 1.87 T17 KG/M³ »neutron mass-pearls» stays PUT as such — until met with some object on a rude impact: the neutron pearl continues to be a compact Dmax mass unit until neutron decay is completed and a normal primary internal exothermal fusion forms a pack of some molecular material grain — perhaps a grain of quartz sand.

 

2.  SOME CONVENTIONAL NEUTRON DECAY TIME PASSES before the surface matrix ejects — with our suggested v>c. Now we have a possible already formed grain of sand — pacing away on v>c into the vast spaces:

•   PROVIDED A FIRST EXISTENT F(Btoroid)+F(eZ) FORCE FIELD — forming the actual molecular material — IT must experience a LOSS — an electromagnetic decrease in force — AS the grain enters the border v=c. Clearly.

— What is POSSIBLY happening THERE?

 

 

TNED explains phenomena:

 

 

Reduced force (F=ma=mv/t=p/t) means: less TIME to »catch up mass» — or GIVE time to a linear momentum p=mv — on an already given pace (v).

•   Inevitably some of the grains outer electron masses (Casimir region) will be lost — forming a tail after the v>c pacing grain.

SIMULTANEOUSLY The nuclear charge (Z) loses potential:

•   Decreasing Coulomb (ionizing) repellant force favors increasing gravitation:

•   IF ALL Coulomb (ionizing) repellant force is supressed, ONLY gravitation is left to »take over».

— BUT: Each g-body also has a zero gravitating CENTER — where a c>0 always is guaranteed — PROVIDED the mass object is not gravitationally affected — »compromised» (”fucked up”) — by a local dominant g-field.

•   AS SPACES BETWEEN GALAXIES AND STAR FORMATIONS IN OUR UNIVERSE ARE HUGE — and the general gravitational potentials between them — over the huges average distances — cancel on a net zero, there should be some left possibilities for grains to represent their own local dominant gravitational fields, however very weak — depending on their inner gravitational morphology (with eventual rest of some macroscopic Coulomb fields). Meaning:

•   THE ALREADY SHAPED AND ESTABLISHED GRAIN MOLECULAR FORM WILL NOT SPLIT OR DEGENERATE — although »the outer rim» of the grain will have a reduced electron crew.

ElectronFEATURE:

THERE IS A »lost electron mass REFILL POSSIBILITY» HERE — inelastic impact with practically zero losses:

 

 

As explained in SPECTRUM AND QUANTUM NUMBERS and POLARIZATION PHENOMENA and ELECTRON’S BUBBLE CHAMBER TRACKS the electron in not a particle but a quantized amount of mass: the TNED deduced tau-rings (τ). Specifically the bubble chamber electron tracks, says TNED, is impossible to explain from an idea that the electron is what is called in modern corridors ”a point particle”.

— When the electron is accelerated by a voltage, its tau-rings tail magnetically on a line — which type-ring-coil of adjacent tau-rings excellently do explain in detail the observed bubble chamber tracks.

 

Accelerated/Travelling electrically charged rings follow the simple MAGNETIC FEATURE: the rings are mutually magnetically alined on one single trajectory track. Energy losses limits the time window of the travel. And the effect of the instrumental magnetic field B causes the cylinder rod to rotate: the collected ring cylinder oscillates between a maximum elonged and a maximum compressed cylinder rod. All mathematically expressable in every single detail.

 

   A corresponding explanation in modern quarters has been searched for: not found.

— Around 1925 (Gamow quote) Heisenberg and Schrödinger gave almost a full explanation to the spectrum of atoms — on the use of corresponding so called ”vibrators”: the tau-ring components. Indeed. Matrices and wave functions, same result.

— 1927 these highly revealing ”vibrators” were abandoned by Heisenberg — referring to the theory of relativity.

•   Modern academic teaching system had it all on the table 1925+. But chose to turn its back on it.

— Some achievements in the history of modern academic ideas of physics are definitely and certainly more prominent than others.

   In polarization: The tau-rings excellently explain absorption and reflexion according to already well known observations.

   In spectrum and quantum numbers: The tau-rings explain with more detail than modern academy can fathom the body behind the quantum concept.

 

 

•  TAILING ELECTRON MASSES behind our exemplified v>c pacing material grain will reside in their »left-over» general c-space between galaxies and star clusters:

•   With no attracting source, the now freely space-existing tau-rings diverge — spread out — due to their negative charge. And they eventually end up as typical »resting objects» relative the average distance positions between galaxies and stars.

 

IF our v>c pacing sand grain — partially deprived some of its matter-side outer electron masses as suggested — collides with such a v=0 tau-ring, a simple inelastic impact calculations math shows that the overall energy (kinetic speed) of the sand grain is practically preserved intact;

 

 

GENERAL IMPACT FEATURES (School physics lectures — in any general literature on the subject)

•   A complete elastic impact preserves linear momentum p=mv and kinetic energy E=mv²/2 ;

•   An inelastic impact preserves linear momentum with more or less loss in kinetic energy;

•   In any case:

•   E = Fd = mad = m(dv/dt)d = m(v²/2d)d = mv²/2 = mv·v/2 = p·v/2 = hf = mc²

— The linear momentum property (quantity of motion: impulse) p=mv is apparently a non destructable part of the property of energy (E). As energy cannot be created nor destroyed, linear momentum is principally equally impossible to get rid of. One way or the other: in mechanic-physics as well as in electro-physics.

 

Found:

— LINEAR MOMENTUM by itself Ft = mat =m(v/t)t = mv = p = linear momentum IS TIME INDEPENDENT — as gravitation GRIP is. ONCE GIVEN:

•   CANNOT BE DESTROYED. ONLY DISTRIBUTED OVER other SUMMING MASSES AND VELOCITIES:

— Equal for all matter, cannot be shielded from: time independent.

FOUNDATION OF INSTRUMENTATION

THE HEART OF THE REAL WORLD

PRACTICAL MECHANICS, INDUSTRY AND TRADE.

   But this type of (causality, causal reasoning) was banned during the 1800+ evolution in modern academic idea — its comprehensive fathomness — of existence in general and universe in explicit. Compare The LIST.

— See ENERGY LAW ¦ IN RELATED PHYSICS ¦ PRINCIPLE OF MOTION: impulse — interval — p=mv precedes force. Impossible to destroy. See also Interval’s indestructability. All basic elementary physics, logics and mathematics that modern academy 1800+ banned. Foremost result: no atomic nucleus deduction.

   Addressing Logics Outside Existence: Academic Never Proclaimed Insanity. »Humanity’s 1800+ Dead End».

 

rEX:

RELATED — deduced — exemplified exercise on 100% inelastic impact — we need familiarity with some basic insight into the machinery;

InELASTIC

AFTER IMPACT BOTH BODIES SHARE SAME VELOCITY:

 

100% INELASTIC IMPACT: v = (cvA + vB)/(c + 1) ¦ c = mA/mB ¦ EX = ½ ;  ←=+:

a: .......  v = (cvA + vB)/(c + 1) = (½·0 + 10)/(½ + 1) = 20/3 = 6.67 M/S

b: .......  v = (cvA + vB)/(c + 1) = (–½·5 + 5)/(½ + 1) = 5(1/3) = 1.67 M/S

c: .......  v = (cvA + vB)/(c + 1) = (–½·10 + 5)/(½ + 1) = 0 M/S

 

•   PRESERVED LINEAR MOMENTUM p=mv — same result:

v0[m0(beforeImpact)] ± w[m(beforeImpact)] = v[M(= m0 + m)after impact]

5[4] – 5[2] = v[4 + 2] = 5([4] – [2] = 2) = 10         ;

v0[←m0] – w[→m] = v[m0 + m = M]                                        ;

v = v0([←m0] – w[→m])/[M]                                                    ;

v = v0([m0] ± w[m])/[M]                                                                   ;

ELASTIC: Found 

100% ELASTIC —  

Recoil action — if mA<mB ¦ assuming vB=0:

100% ELASTIC IMPACT impulse:

mAvA + 0 = mAvA’ + mBvB’              ; c = mA/mB ¦ EX = 1/2                                      ;

mBcvA + 0 = mBcvA’ + mBvB’           ;

cvA = cvA’ + vB’                                   ; cv0 = cv + w ;  c2v02 = (cv + w)2 = c2v2 + w2 + 2cvw     ;

; cv02 = cv2 + w2/c + 2vw

100% ELASTIC IMPACT conserved energy:

mAvA² + 0 = mAvA’² + mBvB’²          ;

mBcvA² + 0 = mBcvA’² + mBvB’²       ;

cvA² = cvA’² + vB’²                               ;  cv02 = cv2 + w2 = cv2 + w2/c + 2vw                 ;

----------------

cv2 + w2 = cv2 + w2/c + 2vw                   ;

w2 = w2/c + 2vw                                      ;

w2 – w2/c = 2vw = w2(1 – 1/c)                ;

2vw = w2(1 – 1/c)                                   ;

2v = w(1 – 1/c)                                       ;

v = w(1 – 1/c)/2                                      ;

cv0 = cv + w                                           ;

cv0 – w = cv                                            ;

v0 – w/c = v                                             ;

v0 – w/c = w(1 – 1/c)/2                            ;

v0 = w(1 – 1/c)/2 + w/c                           ;

v0 = w[(1 – 1/c)/2 + 1/c]                        ;

v0 = w[1/2 – 1/2c + 2/2c]                      ;

v0 = w[1/2 + 1/2c]                                 ;

v0 = w[1 + 1/c]/2                                   ;

w = 2v0/[1 + 1/c] = vB’                        ; c = mA/mB ¦ EX = 1/2 .......... [mA]→ ... [mB]:

vB’ = 2vA/[1 + 1/c]                              ; 2·2/[1 + 2] = 4/3 = 1.3 M/S

vA’ = vA – vB’/c                                    ; 2 – 2(4/3) = 2 – 8/3 = –2/3 = –0.67 M/S Recoil direction automatically included

----------------                                           ; (2·2² + 4·0²)/2 = 4 = (2[2/3]² + 4[4/3]² = 8/9 + 64/9 = 72/9 = 8)/2 = 4; energy conserved

InELASTIC: ELASTIC

100% InELASTIC

 

After impact both bodies share same velocity

100% InELASTIC IMPACT impulse:

mAvA + mBvB = mAv + mBv              ; c = mA/mB ¦ EX = 1/2                         ;

mAvA + mBvB = v(mA + mB)             ; mBcvA + mBvB = v(mBc + mB)

cvA + vB = v(c + 1)                               ; v = (cvA + vB)/(c + 1)                         ;

 

100% InELASTIC IMPACT energy — before impact:

E = (mAvA² + mBvB²)/2                       ; (2·0² + 4·10²)/2 = 200.0 J

100% InELASTIC IMPACT energy — after impact:

E = (mA + mB)v²/2                                ; (2 + 4)(20/3)²/2 = 133.3 J

 

Calculating the possible sand grain free space travel

 

•   SITUATION: A group of atoms (formerly composed from a tight neutron grain, as they are accelerated out of a fast expanding primary J-body through its internal divergence ignition) exceed the local divergence (c) by their mechanically ejected velocity  v:

— A state of »multiple c» has arrived.

 

— What about the atom’s inner normal molecular connections?

Can it be thoroughly mathematically-physically described by TNED?

— Yes. So it seems. We study how.

 

 

vEJECT: InELASTIC

EarthMass2021IAU.ods Tabell3¦E82

 

 

From the TNED deduced K-cell expansion physics, a J-body’s divergence activation entails a gravitational equivalent to a correspinding contractive recoil phase:

•   The J-body with primary mass m expands from Dmax up to Dnormal on a general ejected highest surface velocity

 

v           = m1/3(0.011041 M/KG1/3S)

 

With our earlier calculated highest possible 3.6c0 kinetic velocity as a messenger from the last possible TNED cosmologically deduced birth of stars and galaxies, the actual primary J-body mass would have to be

 

m          = 469.4 SunMasses = 9.339947492 T32 KG — matching 3.6c

about  (9.34 T32 KG) / (2 T41 KG) = 4.67 t9 of our Milky Way mass: a rough 214 millionth part.

 

 

TAKING THE (TOM) ALTERNATIVE 2:

•   THE OUTERMOST ATOMS ON all six sides of the ideal sand grain cube will (most likely) lose some of their electron masses. A tail of these are left behind the pacing grain as the electromagnetic force loses its (imminent outer) grip on the material object as it has been interpreted in this example — with a corresponding result that the reduced internal electric forces renders a gain on corresponding gravitational grasp and tug.

 

COSMOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCE:

•   1. As the ejected debris in TNED (355/1) means a huge overrepresentation relative the visual mass (mVIZ), a corresponding possible huge phenomenal (ejection complex) leftover electronmasses — possibly — populate »the empty spaces» between galaxies and star clusters.

•   2. The electron mass quantity in TNED (ElectronFEATURE) as composed of tau-rings (explained explicitly in SPECTRUM AND QUANTUM NUMBERS) are inevitablu internal DIVERGENT on their negative ring charge (TAU ¦ Q=e/n): they spread out with maximun mutual distances.

 

TNED — Proton illustration with a comparing possible electron mass specification — based on deducing details in ElectronFEATURE.

 

TNED estimated/calculated number of tau rings (»Heisenberg’s 1927 vibrators») in one electron mass (see Casimir Effect): n = 673 026.

— When most tightly formed — as periodically in the ANNIHILATION PROCESS — the tau rings (possibly) form a cylinder with length 1.96 t16 M and diameter 2.74 t17 M. See also, unless already aquainted: THE NEUTRON DECAY.

 

•   3. High (v>c) pace material grains impacting such free space residing tau-rings can — hence — be treated on a general  100% INELASTIC IMPACT occasion — possibly »collecting and cleaning up» previously left over tau-rings from high speed grains. Thereby a NEUTRALIZING explanation — partly or completely — is introduced on a possible net loss of electron mass during v>c high speed transits.

 

 

POSSIBLE RESULT:

 

— When each front side of the ideal sand grain cube (pacing some space on 3.6c) meets with a single individual tau (τ) ring

 

mτ        = 0.000548598u/n = 1.353370772 t36 KG — at relative res ..           v = 0 = vA

m          = 2.32 t6 KG — 1mM³ Quartz sand grain — ideally: .............             v = 3.6c0 = vB

c           = mτ/m = 1.35 t36 / 2.32 t6 ~ 5.82 t31

100% InELASTIC IMPACT — resulting velocity v (related examples explain the details)

v           = (cvA + vB)/(c + 1) = (5.82 t31 · 0 + 3.6c0)/(c + 1 = 1.000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 582)

             = 3.6c0              ; practically no change at all.

EVEN IF WE TAKE ALL THE AVAILABLE ELECTRON MASSES ON ALL SIX FRONT SURFACE SIDES OF THE 1mM³ sand grain cube

 

— On each 1mM square surface with a 2.5Å=0.25nM=2.5 t10 M mean Quartz SiO2 molecular distance there are (0.001M)²/(2.5Å=2.5 t10 M)² = 1.6 T13 SiO2 entities;

— six sides sum 9.6 T13 cube surface SiO2 entities:

— Each SiO2 entity has a maximum of Z=14+16=30 electron atomic masses:

— Assuming all 30 removed from each of the cube’s six surface sides yields a total six side removed

number of removed surface electrons N = 30 × 9.6 T13 = 2.88 T15 me with a total mass of

me¦SUM           = 0.000548598u × 2.88 T15 ~  2.62 t15 KG

c                        = mτ/m = 2.62 t15 / 2.32 t6 ~ 1.13 t9

 

the result still claims

v           = (cvA + vB)/(c + 1) = (1.13 t9 · 0 + 3.6c0)/(1.13 t9 + 1 = 1.000 000 00113)

             = 3.5999999959c0         ; STILL practically no change at all.

 

The grain paces the spaces practically unhindered — until met with some bigger object.

— HOW BIG — to reduce the vB to a near (1M/S) zero? ANSWER:

•   v       = 3.6c0/(c + 1) = 1 M/S demands that  3.6c0 = (c + 1)1M/S = (M/m + 1)1M/S ;  3.6c0S/M – 1 = M/m

•   M     = m(3.6c0S/M – 1) = (2.32 t6 KG)(1 079 252 849 M/S) = 2 503.87 KG : about 2.5 ton for halting the 3.6c0 grain intruder (2.5 M³ ocean water).

 

•   THE HIGH PACE GRAIN OF SAND TAKES NO SLOWING IN RECOLLECTING FULL ELECTRON CREW.

 

TotalCount:

•   THE QUEST OF THE CONSTANT MASS OF THE EARTH AS SUGGESTED ..

 

The Practical Earth side of The Sand Expedition — mJbalance ¦ UniverseSAND

THE TOTAL SAND GRAIN ACCOUNT

IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANY INSTRUMENTAL EXPEDITION TO MEASURE OR OBSERVE IS ONE SINGLE SAND GRAIN PER 1 SQUARE EARTH SURFACE METER — ARRIVING HERE ONCE EVERY 12 YEARS:

— That would explain a possible amount of sand of the existing amount on Earth’s surface — exactly balancing the annual atmospheric mass escape of hydrogen and helium. Possibly.

— Because, what we know, its low frequency of possible arrival and small dimension cannot be instrumentally observed over the relatively large area (1 grain of sand per 1M²/12y or 1 grain per 12M²/y), the possibility represents an open quest that, what we know, cannot be settled by any instrumental observation or registration (no such instrumentation exists: too low arriving frequency over too large area by too small mass).

 

QuotingSOURCES:

COSMIC TNED DEDUCED PRODUCED SAND HELPS US POSSIBLY DEFINE

An EARTH’S MASS POSSIBLE CONSTANT: »AtmosphericOUT = CosmicIN»?

———————————————————————————————

 

•   The international Cambridge ASTRONOMY source 1977/78 (BA1978s244sp2mn) suggests — with a high degree of uncertainty — that a “total ca 1000 ton” (“extremely uncertain”) per 24h of microscopic interstellar dust is added to Earth.

— That is (at most)  1000 T3 KG · 365d =

             36.5 T7 KG/y

— with a possible lowest margin we cannot state (yet). The newer data below Dec2021 may (or may not) be more accurate: there are still (possibly, relatively large) uncertainties. See CODITA source below.

 

Some website domains Dec2021 on the subject “Earth mass losses” seem not to mention this (older possible) main influence;

Wikipedia, Earth mass: [microscopic 22Nov2021: “.. including micrometeorites and cosmic dust ..”

“The combined effect is a net loss of material estimated at 5.5 × 10^7 kg .. per year.”,  .. [citation needed].

9.5 T7 KG Hydrogen +  0.16 T7 KG Helium OUT, = 9.66 T7 — minus 4.16 T7 stuff IN:

out        9.66 T7 KG/y ¦ 9.5 T7 KG Hydrogen + 0.16 T7 KG Helium

in          4.16 T7 KG/y

netout   5.50 T7 KG/y the Wikipedia source — with recognized uncertainties

——————————————————————

WIKIPEDIA REFERENCES (CODITA 2012)

— renders a more detailed picture of the sources:

——————————————————————

H          9.50 T7 KG/y  OUT

He        0.16 T7 KG/y  OUT ...... plus some minor additional satellite space debris .. ;

sum      9.66 T7 KG/y ¦  264 658 KG/d

——————————————————————

Cosmic dust: 100-300 ton/d =

             3.65-

             10.95 T7 KG/y   IN — »huge discrepancy» (uncertain frequency of larger meteorites counts ..)

——————————————————————

“Satellite observations suggest that 100-300 tonnes of cosmic dust enters the atmosphere each day.

This figure tallies with ..”

——————————————————————

netOUT =

             6.01 —

             –0.96 T7 KG/y ..........  close to balance out=in on largest

“vary by a factor of hundred”,

CODITA-source: UK-GERMANY National Astronomy Meeting NAM2012: measuring the cosmic dust swept up by the Earth

——————————————————————

“.. measurements in the earth's atmosphere indicate that the input could be as low as 5 tonnes per day ..”

             1.825 T6 KG/y

——————————————————————

netOUT = 9.66 T7 – 0.1825 T7 =

             9.4775 T7 KG/y ......    @ present time 2021: measurements (near 2000), 20 years data collection

•   These figures are more precise than the older Cambridge Astronomy figure

(with attested high uncertainty suggested: 1000 ton/d).

 

•   The hydrogen escape (ConBEAT ¦ HESC) process in the Earth's top atmosphere — Sun's dissolving water molecule insolation splitting Planck energy — takes (Wikipedia, Earth mass: see ConBEAT) 9.5 T7 KG/y. A corresponding water decrease is restored (possibly in exact balance) through crust erosion — liberating integrated lithospheric water: initially 19mSEA lithospheric + 1 stationary 1mSEA. The balance then results in a constant surface mSEA= 1.4 T21 KG — if an ideal balance between escape and erosion holds.

 

POSSIBLE RESULT — BY EXPEDITIONARY INSTRUMENTAL MEASURES (Dec2021):

 

•   Earth’s mass may or may not be understood as a physical cosmological mass constant.

•   But proving it in any instrumental detail seems close to “mission impossible”.

— INSTRUMENTALLY viewed (Quoting Sources): we don't know for sure — yet.

•   Taking the direct net atmospheric outflow of mass 9.66 T7 KG/y evenly spread out over the flat equatorial Earth sphere’s surface (5.11 T14 M²) — (9.66 T7 KG/y)/(5.11 T14 M²) = 1.890410959 t7 KG/M²y — resolved by an average mass balancing INCOMING GRAIN OF SAND of mass 2.32 t6 KG means

 

(1.890410959 t7 KG/M²y)/(2.32 t6 KG/grain) = 1grain/12.27246377M²y:

 

•   1 grain per 12.27M² once every year, or

•   1 grain per 1M² once every 12.27year. There is no such possible measuring instrumentation on Earth, what we know (»GrandPa’s Diary»: one single 1mM³ grain of sand — over a decade). Trying to take it from space even increases the collecting uncertainty.

 

•   IF such an activity is applied to the general TNED TimeLINE chart — incoming sand grains during the entire Earth’s Dnormal history (20.82Gy) — the amount of collected sand during the last 4.5Gy (from first water on Earth) would have become m = 4.5Gy × 9.66 T7 KG/y = 4.347 T17 KG Sand.. With a mean (Quartz) density of D = 2 320 KG/M³, that sand volume is V = m/D = 1.8737 T14 M³ rounded:

— With 30% land and its (estimated) another 30% deserts — 0.3²×5.11T14M² = 4.6 T13 M² Desert — the average depth or height (h) of sand filling the deserts ideally even up would be

h = 1.8737 T14 M³ / 4.6 T13 M² = 4.1 M (type house high) desert sand rounded. No account taken on the amount over the sea floors.

— It is indeed a reasonable quantity result only by view of the naked eye from pictures over the world

— and, as we know, impossible to either reject or verify by any instrumental measure relative to the suggested origin (SAND).

 

 

The RATE (ConBEAT 8.55 T8 KG/y ) of 1mSEA

— exchange between atmosphere and Earth crust mineral integrated water

— means that (TNED-physics: ideal Sun energy with 100% hydrogen in complete burn to helium)

during the Sun's total lifetime ~ 120Gy, the Earth crust will lose an amount of 1.026 T20 KG water

— that is 7.3% of 1mSEA (1.4 T21 KG = all oceans, land water and ice on Earth: also in EARTH FACT SHEET — NASA: “Tota1 mass of hydrosphere: 1.4 × 1021 KG”). As this loss is filled in with water from the still eroding/weathering lithosphere, the actual water loss is only appearing in the crust. And as such ([7.3%/1mSEA]/20mSEA = 0.35%) only 0.35% of the whole Earth water bank (mH2O) is involved until Day End of our Sun. After that — Sun goes on vacation: battery out — the rest of the journey will be ICE: no more hydrogen escape: no light — not until the next K-cell expansion history. But that is another novel not covered in this paper.

 

 

TNED

 

 

 

KCHIP:

 

 

KCHIP — the reason why.

Found (19Dec2021)

K-CELL EXPANSION HALTING PRINCIPLE

EXPANDING MASS BODY DEVELOPMENT — WITH UNIQUE PROPERTIES

— In modern academy, that Body Principle is not even mentioned — it has not even a theory — not one single application?

 

 

 

 

At a given moment of time t:

Expansion rate is always highest at the K-cell rim (vt-graph below)

— decreasing to zero at K center where the enveloped mass m also is zero, mv-graph above.

•   With K-cell expansion • →, an ideal homogeneously inner K-cell expanding body ← • → hence experiences a stronger velocity decrease OUT→ than ←IN as the K-cell expansion continues to lose v-pace.

   So — not really — ”linear momentum p=mv is conserved” for a type K-cell expanding mass.

 Rather:

— » Linear momentum is favored towards the inner for an expanding body containing inner expanding bodies».

•   The K-cell decreasing expansion velocity as time approaches infinity, favors more mvIN then mvOUT:

•   The mvOUT loses pace with higher magnitude than mvIN.

THE REBELLIOUS CONCLUSION WOULD BE:

 

 

— Any (homogeneous) expanding (exploding –a) mass J containing successively inner expanding (exploding ±v) masses j is by physical — gravitational — principle preordained to come to a general J-halt expansion — followed by a contraction. Proof: K-center←+a+v  > –a+v→K-outer.

 

 

 

In an ideal Galilean force field — same gravity tug everywhere — the linear conservation statement holds.

In the actual K-cell inner expanding bodies case it does not:

 

WHERE and WHEN the halt appears depends on specific inner K-cell parameters: the pace with which the inner mass density displacement takes form relative the actual rim expansion pace.

 

vKHALTfactor:

This — the simplest deduced basic K-cell expanding form —

 

------------------------------------------------

vK        = (4Gm/t)1/3/3 = (4Gm/27)1/3/t 1/3

------------------------------------------------

             = 7.2916204 T7 M/S  = vKrem @t=336Gy (=vK HaltFACTOR)

— see K-cell AGE;

continues to expand forever with unlimited-towards-zero decreasing rim velocity unless a halt factor — KCHIP  — is subtracted.

 

has no inner expanding feature. It is only the ideal homogeneous expanding mass m=mK that counts.

 

If an inner expanding body feature is introduced — says KCHIP — a corresponding v-form would apparently take form like

 

vEND @t=KcellAGE = (4Gm/27)1/3/t1/3 – (7.2916204 T7 M/S)^(1) = 0

with some type of a possible v-function as (for example, or other)

v           = (4Gm/27)1/3/t1/3 – (7.2916204 T7 M/S)^([336Gy·yS=1.060650936 T20 S]/t)

 

That so because there is no actual change in the m-part. The only (KCHE) way to halt the basic non-inner body expanding vK expansion then would be in adding a (time function of a) subtracting term:

— slow beginning on high v and small volume, more to the end with lower v and big volume: no direct linear function.

 

EFFECT OF MASS LOSSES FROM HEAT AND LIGHT

 

With a mVIZ¦0.7% mass loss from heat and light during the K-cell expanding period, the basic vK value @t=336Gy reduces by [0.7%(mK)/355 = 8.202816901 T48 KG]

 

m          = mK – 0.7%(mK)/355 = mK(1 – 0.7%/355) = 4.16 T53 KG(0.999980281) ;

vDIFF  = 72916203.626205 M/S – [(4Gm/27)1/3/t 1/3 = 72915724.3616226 M/S]

             = 479.2645823807 M/S

 

MORE BY DETAIL:

K-CELL EXPANSION CONTRACTION TNED BUDGET:

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

 

4.160000000 T53 KG .............  mK comparing reference value: total Universe/K-cell mass

1.171830986 T51 KG .............  mK/355 = mVIZ: thermonuclear energy active universe’s mass

4.148281690 T53 KG .............  mREM = mK–mK/355 = REMAINING INTACT K-cell mass: never affected

8.202816901 T48 KG .............  mL = 0.7%mK/355: thermonuclear hf/c²=m loss during 336Gy

neutron refilled from surrounding neutron dormant c0-body during the contraction phase:

 

mL/mK ....................................  = 0.001971830986%

mL/mREM ..............................  = 0.001977401130%

 

•   mL is spread out evenly (linearly) decreasing over the entire lifetime of the electromagnetically active K-cell [336Gy] by mass losses when stars transfer mass to light and heat (E=hf=mc²).

 

•   mK: The inner fragmenting expanded mK mass is continuously pushed (KCHIP) towards the K-cell center — also in further favor for the higher dynamical effect towards the inner:

 

 

 

 

GRB generation. Fast action in, slow out.

— That works because the gravitational potential (Light’s gravitational dependency: Gm/r) governing the local K-cell divergence (local propagation c of light’s wavelengths λ and frequencies f where c=λf ) is lower towards the K-cell center. Meaning a higher dynamical efficiency there: more space per shorter time is penetrated. Meaning: faster expansion dynamics, faster thermonuclear radiation push on debris (type dust and sand grains). Meaning: a general higher concentration by time towards K center — responsible for (KCHIP) a final K-cell expansion halt.

 

 

MEANING:

— One way or another, all mK mass experiences a drawback into the universal gravitation K-cell center;

 

•   FIRST through the inner bodies’ fragmenting expansion as above — period 0-16.3Gy when tPmax is reached, and after which point of time no more fragmenting expansion takes place;

 

•   SECOND through the described established thermonuclear radiation pressure generated by all light sources — from start to end — continuously and (very) slowly pushing the mREM debris

 

mREM = mK[1 – 1/355] (– mL)

 

preferentially towards the K center

— until all star light has vanished (336Gy, K-cell AGE).

— That point of time (336Gy) would mark the (most closely related) final stop of the K-cell expansion.

 

Removing the mL = 8.202816901 T48 KG part from mK=m in

 

------------------------------------------------

vK        = (4Gm/27)/t1/3

------------------------------------------------

at

vK(336Gy) ....  = 72 916 203.626205 M/S leaves a corresponding smaller

vK(336Gy) ....  = 72 915 724.3616226 M/S with a difference of

vDIFF ...........   = 479.2645823807 M/S.

 

•   The (break contributing) influence from the mass loss mL is apparently negligible.

 

 

KCHIPstart:

Using the KcellAGE preference marker

KCHIP — related from the very start

BEGINNING DIRECTLY FROM K-CELL EXPANSION — THE MOMENT OF DETONATION

 

 

There is a possible (preferential) way to »solve all K-cell inner hopelessly difficult impossible density distribution enigmas for the entire universal history of evolution» — by this simple mathematical approach:

 

We CAN include them all in THE mathematical-physical DETONATING MOMENT:

 

 

 

 

•   The KCHIP has already pointed out the K-cell halting reason: inner fragmenting/expanding J-bodies — K-center •            ←— • →:

•   The gravity factor on the IN is always greater than that on the OUT:

•   J-body linear momentum p=mv ideal conservation (as in a Galilean force field) does not hold in an expanding mother body where its partial child masses expand themselves.

•   Expansion SPEED is always favored as directed to K-center → • ←:

•   Sooner or later the K-cell inner J-body expansion-fragmenting general expansion ceases, stops — and begins a returning contraction.

 

TAKING THE vHALT FACTOR DIRECTLY FROM START

 

In the vESCdiv3 deduction the K-cell general basic (no inner fragmenting) velocity form (vK)

 

------------------------------------------------

vK        = (4Gm/t)1/3/3 = (4Gm/27)1/3/t1/3 

------------------------------------------------

 

it is only 1/3 of the more simple STATIC escape velocity form

 

vE         = √ 2Gm/r

             = 3vK

 

as derived directly from the equivalence between kinetic energy (E=Fr) and its gravitational counterpart E = Mv²/2 = Fr = GmM/r with v² = 2Gm/r.

 

As our K-cell vEND-factor (vHALT) is defined by a definitely deduced KcellAGE preference marker

 

vEND @t=KcellAGE = (4Gm/27)1/3/t1/3 – vHALT = 0

vHALT = 7.2916204 T7 M/S

 

the entire related K-cell velocity can be traced back to THAT FIRST J-body DIAMETER (Ø) location (R–r=[r+Ø]–r) in the K-cell WHERE

 

vHALT = (√ 2Gm)(1/√r – 1/√R)/3 = 7.2916204 T7 M/S ;

3vHALT/(√ 2Gm) = 1/√r – 1/√R

√R = 1/[1/√r – 3vHALT/(√ 2Gm)]

R = 1/[1/√r – 3vHALT/(√ 2Gm)]² ;

Ø = R – r

 

AT tOFFSET — just before the K-cell contraction ends with contact between all the maximum packed neutrons close to the actual K-cell detonation —

 

tOFFSET          = √ 3/2πGDmax = 0.000198226014336 S

                          = 1.98226014336 t4 S

 

its smallest Dmax radius (CONTRACTIVE r) is calculated from (KcellAGE here simplified as 336Gy from previous basic paper work, a reference value)

 

r            = (3m/4πD)1/3 = (3m/4π[3/2πGt²])1/3

             = (Gm/2)1/3t2/3

             = 8.169023690 T11 M

 

Then (R = 816902412390.8 M = 8.169024123908 T11 M)

 

←Ø→ = R – r

             = 43 361.6671142578 M

             ~ 43 KM

 

WHEN the K-cell detonates and gives its first expansion movement over THAT Ø, »it’s done».

•   Irrevocably doomed to return (KCHIP).

 

 

It does not matter when, how or what type of specific density distributions will occur inside the rest of the K-cell expansion history: its fate to halt and begin to contract is (KCHIP) decided the moment it begins to expand.

 

 

That was what we amateurs didn’t grasp from the start.

TheDERIVATIVES:

 

 

 

Perfect Assembly:

 

HOME. It is a symphony — in Heaven. — ”Martha, I’m home again”.

 

 

BUT:

— Is not the physical/dynamical form of a possible inner K-cell related variation conflicted IF, as below, a sudden — not smooth — brake appears in the vK-form?

— And what about the corresponding (smoothly ceasing) variations in density (D)

— and radius (r)?

 

 

vHALT = vEND = the point of time (KcellAGE) beyond which no more expansion reducing pace is available by active force inside the K-cell universe.

 

 

The vEND factor (vEND @t=KcellAGE = (4Gm/27)1/3/t1/3 – vHALT = 0 : vHALT = 7.2916204 T7 M/S) forces the basic vK-form to be pushed vertically down to the y=zero x axis line (x-axis pushed upwards). The same operation but along the x-axis accounts for the tOFFSET factor —

(tOFFSET = √ 3/2πGDmax = 0.000198226014336 S ) because the basic inverted t-function has no own point where it intersects the y-axis. So:

— The K-cell HALT situation — from the basic v-equation — introduces a TIP point: Expansion »suddenly» overturns in contraction:

•   A moment of »flat horizontal standstill» does not exist. Not for the K-cell velocity, radius or density. All breakpoints have a tip. Why is that?

— Is it because the author has less mathematical insight, and therefore choses only the most simple basic equations to get rid of bad critique?

— The reader might be much smarter than the author, and is therefore left to a private own decision on that issue.

— The TNED related reason is much more simple:

•   There are two slightly different sides of the equations describing light’s gravitational dependency — on account of the gravitational potential.

 

 

— No. Not at all — says TNED related mathematical gravitational physics. All parameters cooperate in a unifying total explaining whole.

   How can that be?

Static-Expansive-Contractive, SEC:

COMPILED EXPRESSIONS

Compare basic deducing relations in PRIMARYvFORM:

————————————————————————————

EarthMass2021IAU.ods Tabell3 ¦ CoRoA47 — tested, checked and rechecked over all t: 22Dec2021

EXPANSIVE-CONTRACTIVE ΦK-CELL — covers all cases:

FROM c/c0=1 DownTO –∞ (CHEOPS HYPERBOLIC SOLUTIONS)

————————————————————————————

m = mK KG ; D = 3/2πGt² KG/M³ ;  r = (3m/4πD)1/3 M           ;

————————————————————————————

F           = w²/2c0² = [(Gm/r)/2c0²]                                                ; num

Φ          = INT([1 – (|[F – 1/2]| – [F – 1/2])])                ; num 0¦1

c/c0        = (1/2)(1 + [–2Φ + 1]√| 1 – 2F |)         ; num: | 1 – w²/c0² |

m          = (r/G)c0²(1 – [–2Φ + 1][1–2c/c0]²)                            ; note Expansive-Contractive versus STATIC:

=

F           = w²/c0² = [(Gm/r)/c0²]                                                    ; num

Φ          = –[ ( 1 – F ) / | 1 – F | ]                          ; num =: IF F<1 THENΦ=–1ELSE1 = ±1

c/c0        = (1/2)(1 – Φ√|1 – F|)                ; num: |w²/c0² – 1|

m          = (r/G)c0²(1 + [Φ][1–2c/c0]²)                                      ; note Expansive-Contractive versus STATIC:

 

STATIC ΦK-CELL — covers all cases:

————————————————————————————

m = mK KG ; D = 3/2πGt² KG/M³ ;  r = (3m/4πD)1/3 M           ;

————————————————————————————

F           = w/c0 = √ [(Gm/r)/c0²]                                                    ; num

Φ          = INT([1 – (|[F – 1/2]| – [F – 1/2])]/2)             ; num 0¦1

c/c0        = (1/2)(1 + [–2Φ + 1]√| 1 – (2F)²|)        ; num: | 1 – 4w²/c0² |

m          = (r/4G)c0²(1 – [–2Φ + 1][1–2c/c0]²)                          ; note SEC

 

 

The TIP property IS — defines — the dynamic central foundation

PROMINENT AND DRAMATIC CHANGES IN DYNAMICS appear at the TIP between

 

 

contraction-expansion

triggering detonation by a corresponding initializing »gravitational implosion»

FROM |w²/c0² – 1| TO |4w²/c0² – 1| BackTO |w²/c0² – 1|

 

GRAVITATION convergence PRINCIPLE (Physics 7 Principles)

Equal for all matter, cannot be shielded from; independent of time — not represented in modern academy 1800+

DIVERGENCE light electricity PRINCIPLE (Physics 7 Principles)

Different for all matter, Can be shielded from; Dependent of time — well represented in modern academy 1800+

and

expansion-contraction

enhancing the turning over moment by a corresponding »gravitational implosion».

FROM |w²/c0² – 1| TO |4w²/c0² – 1| BackTO |w²/c0² – 1|

 

 

See the K-cell DETONATION unless already familiar. These (very) simple natural principles rule the whole machinery.

 

 

WITHOUT DEFINITE OPPOSITE (MIRROR) TANGENTIAL BREAKS

BETWEEN THE TWO DIFFERENT STATES OF PHYSICS, NO HERE KNOWN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS EXISTS IN EXPLAINING THE K-CELL BEHAVIOR.

 

EarthMass2021IAU.ods Tabell3 ¦ CoRoA47 — has been used to check and crosscheck basic K-cell values in total and in specific by inner limited regions — on the given set of deduced CHEOPS HYPERBOLIC SOLUTIONS equations.

 

 

 

 

vESCdiv3:

 

vEscape/3=vKcellRIM

 

vE = √2Gm/r  

——————— = 3

vK = (4Gm/t)1/3/3

 

DEDUCTION — ExpansionConnection:

 

K-cell basic physics in TNED

Static ESCAPE VELOCITY vE AND Expansion K-CELL RIM VELOCITY vK BOTH DECREASE WITH THE K-CELL EXPANSION. Yes.

•   BUT vE is constantly 3 times lager than the actual object: vK. We study how:

------------------------------------------------

vK        = (4Gm/t)1/3/3 = (4Gm/27)1/3/t1/3 

------------------------------------------------

vE         = √2Gm/r ;

r           = (3m/4πD)1/3

D          = 3/2πGt2 ExpansionConnection

r           = (3m/4πD)1/3

r           = (3m/4π[3/2πGt2])1/3

             = (2πGt23m/12π)1/3

r           = (Gt2m/2)1/3

————————————————

vE/vK   = (√2Gm/r)/[(4Gm/t)1/3/3]

             = 3(√2Gm/r)/(4Gm/t)1/3

             = 3t1/3(√2Gm/r)/(4Gm)1/3

————————————————

r           = (Gt2m/2)1/3

————————————————

vE/vK   = 3t1/3(√2Gm/r)/(4Gm)1/3

             = 3t1/3√ (2Gm/r)/(4Gm)2/3

             = 3t1/3√ 2Gm/r(4Gm)2/3

————————————————

r           = (Gt2m/2)1/3

————————————————

vE/vK   = 3t1/3√ 2Gm/r(4Gm)2/3

             = 3t1/3√ 2Gm/[(Gt2m/2)1/3](4Gm)2/3

             = 3t1/3√ 2Gm/[t2/3(Gm/2)1/3](4Gm)2/3

             = 3t1/3(1/t1/3)√ 2Gm/[(Gm/2)1/3](4Gm)2/3

             = 3√ 2Gm/[(Gm/2)1/3](4Gm)2/3

------------------------------------------------

             = 3√ 2Gm/(Gm/2)1/3(4Gm)2/3

             = 3√ 2Gm/(G1/3m1/3/21/3)42/3G2/3m2/3

             = 3√ 21/32Gm/G1/3m1/342/3G2/3m2/3

             = 3√ Gm/G1/3m1/3G2/3m2/3

             = 3√ G/G1/3G2/3

             = 3√ 1

vE/vK   = 3 ;

vE         = 3vK

 

 

PRIMvFORM: vescdiv3

Star Physics in TNED: expansion expressions

 

PRIMARY vFORM

K-cell expansion (KeplerMATH): D = 3/2πGt2 = 3m/4πr3 ¦ r3 = t2Gm/2 ¦ r = t2/3(Gm/2)1/3 ¦

STATIC: v = 2r/t = 2t–1/3(Gm/2)1/3 = t–1/3(8Gm/2)1/3 = t–1/3(4Gm)1/3.

EXPANSIVE-CONTRACTIVE — by derivation dr/dt=v of  the r-form r = t2/3(Gm/2)1/3:

v = t–1/3(4Gm)1/3/3 = (4Gm/27)1/3/t1/3.

Compare Einstein and Schwarzschild (Fig.1):

CHEOPS RECTANGLE

 CHEOPS REKTANGEL

KINETICS — Light’s liberty clause in related physics: light connects not to kinetics:

mv2/2    = Gm2/r ;  v = √ 2Gm/r             ; v2 = 2Gm/r ¦ c2 = 2Gm/r ¦ c02 = 2Gm/r

D          = 3m/4πr3 = m/V                       ;

m/r       = 4πr2D/3

v           = √ 2Gm/r = √ 2G4πr2D/3        = r√ 8πDG/3

r/v        = √ 3/8πDG      = t → LINE      ; v = r/t

2r/v      = √ 3/2πDG      = t → ACC       ; a = v/t ; v = 2r/t ; t = 2r/v = v/a = √ 2r/a: K-CELL EXPANSION

t            = √ 3/2πDG      = t → ACC       ;

D          = 3/2πGt2          ; t → ACC        : K-cell expansion:

LIGHT’S GRAVITATIONAL DEPENDENCY in related physics : w2 = Gm/r : STATIC

————————————————————————————

c = 0 = (1/2)[c02 – √ | –c02 + 4w2  | ] ;  4w2 = 2c02 ;  2w2 = c02 = 2Gm/r

————————————————————————————

c02         = 2Gm/rc0 = 2G 4πrc02D/3        ; STATIC

(rc0/c0)2 = 3/8πDG = t2 → LinearD        ; STATIC

(rc0/c0)2 = 3/2πDG = t2 → AcclrtD        : K-cell expansion; in any case:

rc0/c0     = t                                              ;

rc0         = c0t                                           ; K-CELLc=0RIMfront

 

 

 

 

KcellAGE:

 

KcellAGE

 

•   All K-cell internal electro-physically caused action ceases when stars no longer generate power: all-light off state.

•   THE K-CENTER principle thermonuclear radiation pressure GRAIN PUSH ceases THE MOMENT ALL STARS HAVE FADED:

— At present, the general universal space is reported throughout the literature to have roughly 25% Helium and 75% Hydrogen.

•   Assuming an ideal energy evolving average mean — all over the star dynamics — consuming all Hydrogen, leaving only Helium, the TNED deduced connections account for the following PREFERENCE (benchmark) of THE K-CELL ABSOLUTE AGE DEDUCTION:

 

E/Emax             = [1– (1 + t2/a)] = He% ¦ (Energy connection — K-cell Heat physics) (a=1 here);

Emax/Emax      = 100He% = HeMAX

=   resembling same proportions as our Sun in its ideal TNED deduced 100% hydrogen lifetime (121Gy)

on an effective mass loss during its entire lifetime of roughly 0.7% — Praw = E/t = 3.3 T26 W; Econsumed = 3.3 T26 W × 121Gy = 1.26 T45 J = mc²;

consumed total mass: m = Econsumed/c² = 1.4 T28 KG: mSbegin = 1.99 T30 KG; 1.4 T28 / 1.99 T30 = 7.035 t3 = 0.7% rounded.

= present K-cellAGE / FinalK-cellAGE ;

Time n-unit transfer (K-cell power maximum at unit 1n = tPmax = 16.3735759029251 Gy) gives an alternative expression (original work_ there are two different time scales; »equivalent space age» and dynamically actual age: tPmax)

E                       =  (3Emax)[1/3 – (3 + n2)–1]

Emax/Emax      = 3[1/3 – (3 + n2)–1]

                          = HeMAX ( = 1 = 100%)

 so that (compressed) when The TNED K-cell Universe shuts down (for this show time period) it counts that

99.30He%         = 3[1/3 – (3 + n2)–1] ;

 

 (3 + n2)–1         = 1/3 – 99.30He%/3                               ;

 (3 + n2)            = (1/3 – 99.30He%/3)–1                        ;

  n2                    = (1/3 – 99.30He%/3)–1 – 3                  ;

  n                     = [(1/3 – 99.30He%/3)–1 – 3]          ;

                          = 20.62938265                                       ;

 

KcellAGE — PREFERENCE MARKER

MAXIMUM ENERGY — light — LIFETIME FOR OUR UNIVERSE, says TNED:

n × tPmax        = 337.776 762 670 625 Gy                    ; previous 2008+ rough calculations were rounded 336.

 

After this point of time, all starlight in our universe has ended.

— WHEREAS no more radiation/divergence effect exists to affect matter in general in the (so neutralized) universe, that point of time represents a marker or a DEFINITE PREFERENCE for a K-cell expansion end:

 

WHEREAS the (KCHIP: K-cell halting principle) K-cell internal J-body expansion entirely builds upon electromagnetic activity — including (the 1/355 relation between mVIZ and mK) a general debris sand grain push preferentially more towards the K-cell inner than its outer — any further physical principal K-cell expansion possibility is doomed to cease with the last fading starlight.

 

•   From the KcellAGE marker no MORE physical activity inside the K-cell exists by which to relate a possible K-cell expansion halt.

•   WHATEVER IS at that 99.3%He moment will inevitably mark the K-cell status of its definite possible return.

 

 

 

 

Kalkylkort: CalculusCards — Jan2022

 

CALCULUS CARDS (Sw. Kalkylkort) are based on the Swedish version on OpenOffice Spread sheet documents.

It was generally integrated in this UNIVERSE HISTORY production as a math results exact reference in the original Swedish text editions.

— Here, it (the cell programming commands) is in conflict with the English version — and there is not much to do about that. Except possibly to have two or several language versions on the same computer — automatically transferring the one to the other — but todays programmers are not best known for handling that type of conversions: Compare Microsoft (after the Bill Gates era) on earlier spread sheet versions with the later Excel and OpenOffice in MICROSOFT’S PROGRAM DESTRUCTING EXAMPLES. (The mod operator was frankly removed, replaced by some cryptic with no mathematical explanation: Excel&OpenOffice with associated alike cannot present results from elementary deduced atomic mass equations compilation).

— Excuse me: Most of todays computer program (operating systems) seems more or less like a ”dolls house theater” — compared to known examples of a more related (and faster) programming technique: direct CPU mnemonics type Borland’s TURBO Pascal (with direct classic assembler properties): excluded by Microsoft. MICROSOFT (2016+) — most known for killing — banning — a first (before 2016) free and a highly developing computer culture — as shown by examples.

•   Internet COULD HAVE BEEN something extraordinary — with the citizens of humanity — not Microsoft (2016+) — as the driving innovators. MICROSOFT (2016+) just TOOK it all — forcing individuals to OBEY, not supporting them to develop. Classic Fascistic Satanistic Dictatorship History — on telephone. Must Buy Book. Not one word human rights. Not a single spell. Not a sound. Compare:

IF YOU CARE FOR MY PRIVACY, HOW COME YOU INTERRUPT ME WITHOUT MY PERMISSION?

— Only one cosmic instance does that: the one cogitating itself standing above all the others. Impudence has established: established intrusion.

 

EarthMass2021IAU.ods

 

kalkylkorten nedan DIREKT FRÅN DEN HÄR WEBBLÄSAREN EarthMass2021IAU.ods  — se öppningsmanual om ej redan bekant — eller kopiera URL:en nedan till valfri webbläsare (vilket som fungerar — förutsatt att SVENSKA VERSIONEN av gratisprogramvaran OPEN OFFICE finns installerad på datorn)

http://www.universumshistoria.se/AaKort/EarthMass2021IAU.ods

 

Tabell1:

Generally drafted exercises.

Tabell2:

Compositions with Drafting exercises, with further IAU results from the original CalCard: KcellAnalys2018.ods — Tabell3.

Tabell3:

Comparing Earth mass calculations (A1-46),

General K-cell calculations (A47-58 ¦ 60-78),

SandGRAINtest (A81-95),

Andromeda Test (97-134),

Comparing TNED maxDENSITY calculations on the first 40 nuclides.

Tabell4:

Some compiling results.

 

 

 

SHORT: TNED cosmology in total Dec2021

 

A SHORT DENSE OVERVIEW Dec2021

 

 

Solutions in CWON on CAP

 

 

———————————————

jH2O ¦ BioGAS ¦ BioEK1-10 ¦ TheTEN ¦ AR123 ¦ CWON ¦ CAP ¦ BIOCHEMICAL MATRICES¦

 

claim — apparently — a physical and mathematical existence of a perfect solid Earth mass of no more and no less than mJ = 5.975 T24 KG. It — apparently — is attested by a numerical precision governed by a <±3GRAM biological agent (Leaf&Needle) as the figure 5.975 applies — and too an additional separate CHEOPS proof (PCt ¦ CheopsTESTET which we can leave here, it is not the central nature produced issue).

 

But (WIKIPEDIA and others, EarthPOINT) partly attests other mJ values. And partly certifies a more or less ”mission impossible” in finding any resolution at all for an ”exact”.

   These Partly Associated mJ values also connect, in part, with the problem of finding a precision value for G (Gtest), the universal gravitational constant. And in part expose some definite instrumental issues — who more or less kill any precise attempt.

 

So:

 

WHERE DOES IT — the CWON on CAP exact solution — COME FROM?

— Earth crust isotopic elements composition define the entire mathematical result.

HOW CAN IT BE IF IT ISN’T?

 

That was the five billion dollar question.

 

INVESTIGATING THE POSSIBILITY

OF A COSMOLOGICALLY EXACT EARTH MASS CONSTANT

entails one specific central issue:

— The decisive and possible balance and equilibrium between

 

ATMOSPHERICALout            = COSMICin

HydrogenHeliumOUT                                 = CosmicMatterIN — type SAND

————————————————————

— That introduces the TNED deduced part in Cosmically Produced SAND

— which (Wikipedia quote) in modern corridors is a highly problematic issue.

 

IF — by principle — there is a physically relatable such possibility, the whole quest can — at least — be settled  that there is no instrumental way or method to find any exact resolution:

— »The possibility exists, yes. But an instrumental method to prove it does not exist».

 

CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL ASTRONOMY (QuotingSOURCES, 1977/78 ¦ BA1978) touches on this quest by suggesting a possible ”microscopic” inflow that — possibly — is impossible to settle in any precise instrumental manner.

— More recent (Wikipedia Dec2021 — CODITA) reports give some various values — including such (grave) uncertainties that the early Cambridge suggestion still poses some argumentative power.

 

THE SAND QUEST — K-cell general expansion physics

———————————————————————

SAND ¦ SandEX ¦ SandORIGIN ¦ SandTRAVEL

———————————————————————

has in itself a vast connection in TNED cosmology. It is the only explainable reason behind the huge difference between visual (mVIZ) and actually (by gravitational action) observed mass in our universe (innate galactic gravitational pull — on different scales, as quoted BA1978).

 

THE SAND QUEST leads us — surprisingly — to a specific THE ANDROMEDA TEST:

— density, gravitation and Doppler values determine the result:

•   The measured Andromeda Doppler blue value — claimed in modern quarters as a proof that Andromeda will collide with Milky Way in some billion year future — testifies the TNED deduced Gravitational Doppler effect (modern academy’s ”dark energy” issue): Andromeda lies PUT — TNED result says — close to the K-cell center (c0 physics) with Milky Way (Andromeda Lateral Test) on a possible slight (very hard to determine) rotation.

— It becomes a special TNED K-cell clarification — including explanations in most of the K-cell expansion behavior:

 

AN EXPOSITION over the traditional (classic) ways in determining the size (and mass) of our Earth is given from EARTH RADIUS ¦ EarthMassFIND.

 

 

*

 

So — at the end of all the things:

— Earth Mass Quest?

 

 

 

———————————————

jH2O ¦ BioGAS ¦ BioEK1-10 ¦ TheTEN ¦ AR123 ¦ CWON ¦ CAP ¦ BIOCHEMICAL MATRICES¦

 

 

— If it IS, the Isn’t apparently does not exist. Compare: The discovery of Mathematics.

 

 

Perfect Assembly:

 

HOME. It is a symphony — in Heaven. — ”Martha, I’m home again”.

 

 

But we cannot (yet) prove it in any exact instrumental way.

 

 

 

 

 

CheopsATLAS complement — Dec2021

 

innehåll: content SÖK på denna sida Ctrl+F · sök alla ämnesord överallt i SAKREGISTER  ·  förteckning över alla webbsidor

 

 

 

Universums Historia — CheopsATLAS and associated  in UNIVERSE HISTORY

ämnesrubriker

                                                        

 

innehåll — CONTENT

 

          The EARTH MASS

 

 

EarthMASS

WnSunOrbit

LeafNeedle

Purpose

Earth

Fig1

EarthPoint

Gtest

mSbegRef

EarthRadius

EarthRADalt

EarthRAD

EarthGravity

EarthMassFIND

EMFmethod

EMFresults

EMFdensity

EMFcon

11%

LastREF

TreeDeath

SAN1

SUM

SUNmass

mJbalance

UniverseSAND

WQsandRef

TAT

RAM

DIER

The5th

SANDorigin

DMse

DENSITYin

AndromedaLATERAL

TestEQ

GalTAB

ITM

Wed2021

Cam1977

ITEM

MWR

ITMres

mVIZ

SandEX

AndTER

MARANA

SIU

SAND

SandTRAVEL

Overview

rVIZ

c03p6

FirstIssue

TOM

ElectronFEATURE

GamowRef

Found

rEX

ELASTIC

InELASTIC

vEJECT

Proton

TotalCount

QuotingSOURCES

NASAmSEA

KCHIP

vKHALTfactor

KCHIPstart

DERIVATIVES

SEC

vESCdiv3

PRIMvFORM

KcellAGE

Kalkylkort

SHORT

 

 

referenser

 

[HOP]. HANDBOOK OF PHYSICS, E. U. Condon, McGraw-Hill 1967

Atomviktstabellen i HOP allmän referens i denna presentation, Table 2.1 s9–65—9–86.

mn        = 1,0086652u  ......................    neutronmassan i atomära massenheter (u) [HOP Table 2.1 s9–65]

me        = 0,000548598u  ..................    elektronmassan i atomära massenheter (u) [HOP Table 10.3 s7–155 för me , Table 1.4 s7–27 för u]

u           = 1,66043 t27 KG  ..............     atomära massenheten [HOP Table 1.4 s7–27, 1967]

u           = 1,66033 t27 KG  ..............     atomära massenheten [ENCARTA 99 Molecular Weight]

u           = 1,66041 t27 KG ...............     atomära massenheten [FOCUS MATERIEN 1975 s124sp1mn]

u           = 1,66053886 t27 KG  ........     atomära massenheten [teknisk kalkylator, lista med konstanter SHARP EL-506W (2005)]

u           = 1,6605402 t27 KG  ..........     atomära massenheten [@INTERNET (2007) sv. Wikipedia]

u           = 1,660538782 t27 KG  ......     atomära massenheten [från www.sizes.com],

CODATA rekommendation från 2006 med toleransen ±0,000 000 083 t27 KG (Committe on Data for Science and Technology)]

c0          = 2,99792458 T8 M/S  ........     ljushastigheten i vakuum [ENCARTA 99 Light, Velocity, (uppmättes i början på 1970-talet)]

h           = 6,62559 t34 JS  .................    Plancks konstant [HOP s7–155]

 

[BA]. BONNIERS ASTRONOMI 1978

— Det internationella standardverket om universum sammanställt vid universitetet i Cambridge, The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Astronomy, London 1977.

 

[FM]. FOCUS MATERIEN 1975 — Fysikens, kemins och astronomins historia — Allt från atomen till universum — fysik, kemi, jordvetenskap och astronomi, Register med appendix,

FOCUS UPPSLAGSBÖCKER · STOCKHOLM — Andra, reviderade upplagan 1975

 

[BKL]. BONNIERS KONVERSATIONS LEXIKON, 12 band A(1922)-Ö(1928) med SUPPLEMENT A-Ö(1929)

 

t för 10–, T för 10+, förenklade exponentbeteckningar — simplified notations: t for TEN RAISED TO minus and T for TEN RAISED TO plus.

 

MAC, här ofta använd förkortning för Modern ACademy — etablerad vetenskap sedan början av 1800-talet: established academic consensus since 1800+

 

TNED — Related PHYSICS And MATHEMATICS — Se särskild djupbeskrivning av innebörden i begreppet relaterad framställning.

 

 

  

 

(Toroid Nuclear Electromechanical Dynamics), eller Toroidnukleära Elektromekaniska Dynamiken är den dynamiskt ekvivalenta resultatbeskrivning som följer av härledningarna i Planckringen h=mnc0rn, analogt Atomkärnans Härledning. Beskrivningen enligt TNED är relaterad, vilket innebär: alla, samtliga, detaljer gör anspråk på att vara fullständigt logiskt förklarbara och begripliga, eller så inte alls. Med TNED förstås (således) också

RELATERAD FYSIK OCH MATEMATIK. Se även uppkomsten av termen TNED i Atomkärnans Härledning.

 

See also TNED FROM THE BEGINNING (Swedish edition only Aug2019).

SHORT ENGLISH — TNED in general is not found @INTERNET except under this domain

(Universe[s]History, introduced @INTERNET 2008VII3).

TNED or Toroid Nuclear Electromechanical Dynamics is the dynamically equivalent resulting description following the deductions in THE PLANCK RING, analogous AtomNucleus’ Deduction. The description according to TNED is related, meaning: all, each, details claim to be fully logically explainable and understandable, or not at all. With TNED is (hence) also understood RELATED PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS. See also the emergence of the term TNED in AtomNucleus’ Deduction.

 

 

 

Senast uppdaterade version: 2023-01-26

*END.

Stavningskontrollerat  30Dec2021.

 

rester

*

åter till portalsidan   ·   portalsidan är www.UniversumsHistoria.se 

 

 

≈ Δ Ĵ ∫ α √ π ρ → ∞ τ π ħ ε UNICODE — often used charcters in mathematical-technical-scientifical descriptions

σ ρ ν ν π τ γ λ η ≠ √ ħ ω → ∞ ≡ ↔↕ ħ ℓ

Ω Φ ϕ ϕ Ψ Σ Π Ξ Λ Θ Δ ~

α β γ δ ε λ θ κ π ρ τ φ σ ω ∏ √ ∑ ∂ ∆ ∫ ≤ ≈ ≥ ← ↑ → ∞ ↓

ζ ξ

Arrow symbols, direct via Alt+NumPadKeyboard: Alt+24 ↑; 25 ↓; 26 →; 27 ←; 22 ▬

23 ↨ — also 18 ↕; 29 ↔

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

åter till portalsidan   ·   portalsidan är www.UniversumsHistoria.se