THE ATOMIC NUCLEUS IV 2023XII6 | a production · | Senast uppdaterade version: 2024-11-20 · Universums Historia ♦ HumanRight is a knowledge domain

content — innehåll denna sida · webbSÖK äMNESORD på denna sida Ctrl+F · sök ämnesord överallt i indexREGISTER · förteckning över allUHwebbsites

Atomic masses — AtomicNucleus — INTRODUCTION, nuclear radii, basic nuclides, comparing early Weizsäcker solutions ¦ STANDARD UNIVERSAL — divergence c0 = 2.99792458 T8 M/S is preserved independent of gravitation.

TheAtomicNucleus I Jun2023 — DeducingTHErZ ¦ TAN II Sep2023 — comparing nuclear physics ¦ TAN III Nov2023 — relating Earth crust isotopic compositions ¦ TAN IV Dec2023 — FusionLimitMass FULIMA

PO4 ¦ EarthMASS ¦ MainPurpose ¦ TheFULIMAÑresolution ¦ The rZ RESOLUTION ¦ Resolution 217 in Short

From the fusion limit mass deduction in related physics and mathematics: our EARTH property in the universe — and how it is taken care of by the lawful abiding authorities

FUSION LIMIT MASS — PhotoSYNTHESISsynthesis Added Oct2024

ATOMIC MASS, ATOMIC WEIGHT, ATOMIC MASS DEFECT, NUCLEAR MASS DEFECT, NUCLEAR BINDING ENERGY, AND THE ATOMIC MASS UNIT

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

WORLD ENGAGEMENT — MANY HAVE ALREADY GOT THE HANG OF IT — EXCEPT STATE ADMINISTRATIONS AND EDUCATION AND MEDIA: still not one word. 24/7.

FIRST OF ALL, AGAIN — EVERY CLASS:

CRIME COMBAT — CRIME PREVENTION. SAFETY PROMOTION. 24/7. Defense. Never sleep. Always awake. All branches. Entire Society. Education Explicit UDHR10Dec1948:

And again, and again, and again .. until Sun is OUT 24/7: HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNITION — any claim outside defines exercising oppression — on DRIFT. Never by plan. That is Nature’s law. Disclaim.

— At present: Especially the State Administration Personnel — police, prosecutor, court [example: Sweden] — does not understand the concept: Never a word. Not a spell. Not a sound. 75 years.

♦ Criminality, intrusion, disrespect, violence, rape has exploded. Test the statistics.

— CHILDREN — and even Animals — handles it absolutely gallantly exquisite. Take care not to lose it — »water it». Guard it. Fight for it. With born girl wit. Say again. The Queen of the Universe.

What it entails. What it means. How it is related. How it is exemplified. Its Innate Structure. How it comes to Oblivion.

♦ Societies where human right recognition are realized, related, reminded, respected, does not develop criminality: ”the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”.

♦ 24/7. UDHR10Dec1948 P8. ”.. every individual and every organ in society ..”; ”.. of the greatest importance ..”. Give us one reason to NOT. Just 1.

AiCookies: 11Mar2024 ¦ KNOWLEDGE ¦ WikiHumanTraffic ¦ MayWeUseREF ¦ WeOwnREF ¦ TheProvider ¦ Dandelion ¦ Conclusion ¦ CowExample ¦ Recognition ¦ Resolution217Short

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE — ”AI”: WHAT MEANS ”ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE”? Test answer: NOT ONE WORD HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNITION.

Compare some of the sources exposing an ancient moral conduct:

— Damn you, who collect what is not yours (Hab.2:6).

— FOR THE STONES IN THE WALL SHALL CALL, AND THE BEAMS IN THE TIMBER SHALL ANSWER THEM (Hab.2:11).

— DOES THAT DESCRIBE HOW A CLAIMING AUTHORITY OF INTELLIGENCE in reality GENERATES A PICTURE OF a Retarded, Low educated, Intellectually Disabled fuckup? Say.

— State. Police. Prosecutor. Court. Not one word human right recognition: a definition — state — of dignity destructors. BY DRIFT —— NOT PLAN: Retarded.

— »WE OWN THE FOREST».

— NO YOU DON’T. NOT THAT WAY. No mother god loving way you OWN a forest THAT way.

— A FOREST IS — DURING MANY MILLENNIA — A LIFE PROTECTED, LIFE DEFENSE GUARDED BIOLOGICALLY SECURED BIODIVERSITY LIFE DOMAIN (Simard2012) — THAT IS TO BE SHARED through development BY ALL LIVING CREATURES. Stupid imbecile ego fuck.

— Frankly, no matter what you own: you have no right to even piss on a tree without duly permission.

— ANYONE LAYING A HAND ON THAT LIFE PROVISIONAL FOUNDATION, MAKING EVEN THE SMALLEST CHANGE, PROSECUTES A LIFE development ATTACK. Stupid imbecile ego fuck.

Disclaim. CONSEQUENTIAL MATHEMATICS (COMA) — life defense. Come again.

STATE ADMINISTRATIONS:

Biodiversity: suspended.

Biological Life Power: suspended.

THE MIND RAPING CULTURE BEGAN WITH JURISDICTIONALLY ELECTRONICALLY BOUGHT SIGNAL TRAFFICKING RIGHTS TO PRY, SPY ON, COLLECT AND HANDLE HUMANS’ PERSONAL INTEGRITY machine surveilled and controlled human reflectivity — AS IF AN ADVENT OF A NEW WORLD WIDE CHARITY ENGAGEMENT: TEACHING HUMANS TO BELIEVE THEY ”EXPERIENCE MORE, BETTER, AND DEEPER”, very much exactly so.

Related Status: Humanity’s worst lowest low known standing preference of a mental suer: THE BELIEF THAT PRACTICING MIND SLAVERY IS A JURIDICALLY PROTECTED BUSINESS FREEDOM. Say:

— THE BELIEF THAT REPUGNANCE AND AVERSION AGAINST HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNIZING FUNDAMENTALS 24/7, IS A JURISDICTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHT:

— business supports slavery. Say. Completely impossible before the computer era: inserting a machine managing electronic mirror of the individual mind selectivity management, in order to control the associative, reflective and cogitative individual conduct. A mind dictatorship, A muzzled individual dictating electronic mind rape — only possible in a humanity living in oblivion of its universal human rights.

— A crime of the absolute worst and lowest kind, managed by greed and power to have and exercise control — over LIFE, over THOUGHT, over THINKING — on DRIFT. Not plan: retarded. Disclaim.

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

— WHAT MEANS “ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE” (AI)

— related, fully logically explained (Consequential Mathematics), please?

ANSWER (Consequential Mathematics):

• Not one word human right recognition. Say.

— AI is, provably down to the last universal atom, developed by a gravely low educated and retarded collection of human individuals, electronically seduced by a greedy idea of exploiting humanity's computer usage — buying signal rights — attracted from the even lowest low idea of managing a world business enterprise mind controlling power boot over humanity with associative, reflective and cogitative access over humanity — mind design (UX) — and its heavy generating mental satisfaction in the hand of the fucked up perpetrator, not at all aware of what it is involved in. UN:s Trafficking formulation is a perfect HIT on the enterprise. By DRIFT. Not plan. A Perfectly drained intellectual thinking activity on zero moral, not at all aware of its own connection. Not one word.

AI, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

— mind rape, world-mind dictatorship —

and HumanRightRecognition are two irreconcilable domains.

WikiHumanTraffic: AIC

WIKIPEDIA Human Trafficking (22May2023):

————————————————————————————————————————

The UN Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children, which has 117 signatories and 173 parties,[2] defines human trafficking as:

(a) [...] the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt of persons, by means of threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation.

————————————————————————————————————————

DELIBERATELY OR NOT — because most involved people (cash-desk personnel, as exemplified: »Are you a member?») are not even aware of the gravity of the situation they themselves are involved in —

as also UN itself highly and fundamentally deeply has issues on the idea of ONE human family: ISRAEL: “We are unique in thought ..” — Trafficking Humanity.

EXEMPLIFYING clarifying and relating

forms of coercion:

— Denying access to public human right recognizing open Internet information (medical, general science, provision and many others) by forcing the visitor to accept and consent on cookies to unlock the blocked access. That is coercion — by DRIFT. Not plan; The responsible website administrations have no idea of the content of Human Right Recognition (definition of Trafficking: slavery; mind rape; mind dictatorship) — due to the general careless attitudes from World State Administrations, even on the level of UN itself:

NOT ONE WORD HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNITION. “.. every individual and every organ in society ..”. Not even a hint. ”.. constantly in mind ..”.

It is meaningless or even more violence promoting to sentence a punishment in whatever subject, when the entire humanity as such is held in a state of oblivion on human right recognition content and context.

NOT ONE WORD HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNITION. “.. every individual and every organ in society ..”. Not even a hint.

— Are you a member?

-------------------

NATURE feeds the individual with associative, reflective and cogitative support for individual personal development.

With the advent of JURISDICTIONALLY BOUGHT ELECTRONIC TRAFFICKING RIGHTS, this situation has changed to a world wide business enterprise human trafficking mind rape, constantly attacking and burying the individual in a PAST MIRROR, the individual's sex, age and bodily status, to which the individual becomes electronically chained, cuffed and muzzled; Human Mind Trafficking. Human Mind Slavery.

-------------------

THE HUMAN MIND TRAFFICKING WORLD WIDE BUSINESS MIND RAPING ENTERPRISE beginning in explicit from some 2015¦18+ as observed (Sweden examples)

— “You member?”

Every occasion of a visit in an increasing number of stores and shops, every purchasing occasion: ”Are you a member?”.

— THE PERSONNEL IS NOT AWARE OF WHAT FUNDAMENTALS THEY ARE INVOLVED IN. in IGNORING: human right recognition:

”.. every individual and every organ in society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind ..”, 24/7

CRIME COMBAT. CRIME PREVENTION. SAFETY PROMOTION. 24/7. Defense. Never sleep. Always awake.

” all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world ”

— “You member?”

— THE PERSONNEL FREEZES, DOES NOT UNDERSTAND, LOOKS PARALYZED, HAMMERED BY A SUDDEN HEAVY SURPRISE, COMPLETELY UNAWARE.

The responsible business administrations have no idea of the content of Human Right Recognition — luring the unaware personnel into a collaborating Trafficking.

IT REFLECTS A COMPLETELY MORALLY SUNKEN SOCIETY.

(”.. all members of the human family ..”, ”.. every individual and every organ in society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind ..”, Are you a member? .. ”.. the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”; The business Are you a member ballyhoo situation defines Trafficking: slavery; mind rape; mind dictatorship — on DRIFT. Not plan).

— All due to the general careless attitudes from World State Administrations, even on the level of UN itself, leaving the human populations in an utter 24/7 oblivion — as noted.

— »May we use you to earn more money on?»

FRAUD — by drift. Not plan. The personnel is not aware of what it is involved in: Microsoft&Google&Associated (World governments, Parliaments, institutions, administrations, jurisdiction instances, police, prosecutors. courts): HUMAN MIND RAPING TRAFFICKING. Disclaim.

Suddenly, as a broken dam with heavy flooding water: every purchasing occasion, in a growing number of stores, when reaching the cash-desk, ready to pay:

— »Are you a member?».

P1 UDHR10Dec1948:

“ Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”

P8 UDHR10Dec1948:

“.. this Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and .. ”

P7 UDHR10Dec1948:

“ Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance ..”

:

CRIME COMBAT ♦ CRIME PREVENTION ♦ SAFETY PROMOTION

“.. all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”

24/7. No exceptions. P1 UDHR10Dec1948.

— Are You a member?

CRIME COMBAT ♦ CRIME PREVENTION ♦ SAFETY PROMOTION

Police. Prosecutor. Court. State administrations.

THE (2018+) suddenly gushing appearing World Popular Business gimmick, stunt and ballyhoo gimmickry ”Are you a member”, a hijacked human right recognition kill as certified ”of the greatest importance” proves the

— on Drift (retarded, low educated, intellectually disabled), not plan —

fraud.

THE WORLD WIDE BUSINESS ATTACK REFLECTS A FRAUD — on drift. Not plan. Proof (maintained by retarded, low educated, intellectually disabled:

no human right mentioning. Not a sound):

As experienced: For every new visit in the store, on a growing number of stores, for every time a purchase is about to be made, over and over and over again:

— Are you a member?

— IF the cash-desk personnel should ask the person about to Pay for the merchandise

— »May we use you to earn more money on?»,

it could not longer be interpreted as a FRAUD.

But it would still be an act of Human Trafficking — NOT INFORMING THE PERSON OF THE INDECENT CONDUCT IT IS ABOUT TO ACCEPT.

— Because these AreYouAMemberBusinessSuckers themselves also have no idea. Again: provably retarded, low educated, intellectually disabled. Down to the last atom:

NOT ONE WORD HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNITION. It does not exist in their mind horizon — blinded by greed for control to manipulate — on Power Rights. WaoHiIQ.

MEMBERSHIP ISSUES IN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE AIMS AT RISING THE INCOME. NOT DIMINISHING IT. NOT TELLING THE PERSON IT IS SO, DEFINES A FRAUD, AN UNPROCLAIMED USE OF HUMANITY FOR TRAFFICKING, LURING THE PERSON INTO AN ENTERPRISE BASED ON UNPROCLAIMED SEDUCTION AND MIND RAPE. THAT THE PERPETRATORS ARE UNAWARE OF WHAT THEY ARE DOING, DOES NOT LOWER THE GRAVITY OF THE SITUATION.

Because, what we know, every sane and healthy adult met with such a question would react with detestation and disgust, reporting the absurd occurrence to (social and) justice authorities.

A4 UDHR10Dec1948:

“ No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.”

NO STATE ADMINISTRATION HAVE DECIDING MANDATE OVER HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNITION. No way. Not by body. Not by mind. Not at all. Claim whatever you want.

— WE OWN THE FOREST. — No you don’t. Not THAT way. THAT way defines a life attack. Nature don’t do THAT. Trafficking.

— Get the fuck out of my beach.

If we find it, it defines a »foundation of no-freedom, no-justice and no-peace in the world»: fascism. No world wide human Trafficking business enterprise is allowed in a human right recognizing society. No way. Not by body. Not by mind. Not at all.

TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT REALMS OF ASSOCIATIVE, REFLECTIVE AND COGITATIVE DOMAINS MEET ON A FUNDAMENTAL AND TOTAL SOCIAL COLLISION. The cash-desk personnel reacts as if someone has put a high voltage electrical wire into their body — a fundamental situation of a state of paralyzed mental shock — at the moment a Human Right Recognizing Superior use of ARE YOU A MEMBER enter the ear of the personnel:

— You have absolutely no right to use the member word unless human right recognized. Is that a problem for you?

Yes. It is. And a deep one too;

Prioritizing business before human right recognition DEFINES HUMAN TRAFFICKING PARTICIPATION: slavery trade. Not one word human right recognition. Disclaim.

— WHY DO I NOT UNDERSTAND THAT? Because I have a strong cherish and crush for a specific retarded low educated intellectually disabled idea of daily living. Disclaim. Get it out.

— Are you a member?

TheProvider: WHT

THE PROVIDER — in present daily wording (King James Bible, Swedish Bible 1917 — apparently very old stuff):

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————

— Damn you, who collect what is not yours (Hab.2:6).

— Damn you, who seek unjust winning to your house, seeking protection from your own evil (Hab.2:9).

— Damn you, who offer wine to your next, mixing your poison in it, to expose his private parts (Hab.2:15).

— FOR THE STONES IN THE WALL SHALL CALL, AND THE BEAMS IN THE TIMBER SHALL ANSWER THEM (Hab.2:11).

— If THAT walk into a shop, the merchandise expose tendency to walk out (CONSEQUENTIAL MATHEMATICS).

NOT ONE WORD HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNITION.

Disclaim (Micah.7:4):

“ Den bäste ibland dem är såsom ett törnsnår, den redligaste värre än en taggig häck”.

Say again. Come again.

Translated direct from the Swedish 1917 Bible:

The best among them is like a thorny thicket, the most honorable worse than a spinous rack.

— The privilege of coming to maturity among these excellent upstanding aces, is just an extraordinary liberating experience.

Internet Cookies and Artificial Intelligence

THE INDIVIDUAL IS TOLD — NEVER ASKED, NEVER INVITED TO ARGUE ON OWN WORDS: practically pissed on, directly in the face. Say.

BEHIND THE SCENE:

— »WE ARE NOT INTERESTED IN YOUR INDIVIDUAL INDEPENDENCY OF AGE, SEX, CHOICE AND ACTIVITY — CREEP».

— »WE ARE ONLY INTERESTED IN PROMPTING ON YOU OUR SUPREME PROVABLY DOWN TO THE LAST ATOM RETARDED AND EXCEPTIONALLY LOW MORAL THINKING WITH ZERO HUMAN RIGHT MENTIONING CONTEXT AND CONTENT — NO FUCKING EXCEPTIONS, IMPROVING YOUR BOTTOM CREEPY LOW IDEA OF PRIVACY, FORCING IT UP TO A HIGHER LEVEL, FORCING AN ACCEPTED CONDUCT ON YOUR VERY LOW PRIVATE ELECTRONIC COMPUTERIZED USE AND ACTIVITY, AS WE DICTATE IT FOR YOU, CREEP, NEVER ALLOWING YOU TO BE AN INDEPENDENT YOU WITH INDIVIDUAL SAYINGS AND EXPRESSIONS, INDEPENDENT ASSOCIATIONS AND REFLEXIONS — YOU IMBECILE FUCK, BECAUSE THAT IS HOW WE ADDRESS YOU, YOU SPEECHLESS IDIOT — KNEEL BEFORE US!».

— » SAY SOMETHING, YOU FUCK! .. WE COOKIE ADMINISTRATORS CAN’T HEAR YOU! .. WHAT DID YOU SAY, YOU CREEPY FUCK!».

PROVABLY INTELLECTUALLY RETARDED MONEY ACES OCCUPY INTERNET WITH THEIR FANCY RETARDED THERAPY IDEAS OF EXPERIENCE, BUSINESS, DESTROYING THE IMMENSELY FINE INTERNET THAT WAS FROM THE START: SO MUCH FREE, OPEN ACCESS FOR EVERYBODY — PROGRAMMING TOOLS, DEVELOPMENT AID. Today Mar2024. Fundamentally Dead. Completely Suspended. No sign of life.

Ugly, dictating, repulsive, presentations — from a self-proclaimed business elite as a Human Mind Superior.

Exceptionally Low Communicating Awareness.

Retarded Apprehension on Care — open public mind raping.

That is so much we love you.

AI, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

— mind rape, world-mind dictatorship —

and HumanRightRecognition are two irreconcilable domains.

This author would be extremely satisfied (ultra euphoria) if there would be even one presented even the smallest tiniest itty bitty RELATED ARGUMENT exposing the above irreconcilable to be a false statement (Consequential Mathematics [COMA][IteratorMechanics]).

Namely the first:

Dandelion: TheProvider

WHAT FASCISTIC SOCIETIES HATE MOST: To observe what already exist, and adopt to its already existent harmony. Recognition. Not decision.

Interfering with its order generates destruction. Society must build on Recognition. Not decision. Discovery and deduction. Not invention, not academic consensus. Science. RELATED ARGUMENTATION.

— The AI inventors have no idea of what HumanRightRecognition is about, what it contains, and what it entails. No way.

HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNITION:

“.. the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world” (P1 UDHR10Dec1948):

— Children — and even animals — apprehend that type of simple and easy to understand basics with excellent perfection.

So: where did the AI Aces come from, and when did that happen, and on what reasons?

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Not one word human right recognition.

— You were saying?

The inventors are — so provably — retarded, low educated, and Profoundly Intellectually Disabled.

Most popular pet (Mar2024):

24/7 MIND Manipulating humanity — the individually surveilled Cow — by signals of sound and light.

Not one word human right Recognition.

On a rough cultural year 1800 basis: EVERYWHERE IN THE UNIVERSE, NATURAL DYNAMICS WORKS ACCORDING TO THIS BASIC UNIVERSAL MATRIX SYSTEM OF ORDER:

— EXCEPT HERE: Europe. Decision. Not Recognition. And so it has continued since. A fascistic satanistic jurisdictional society is built and maintained by provably retarded low educated intellectually disabled. Obedience.

HUMAN HISTORY’S WORST FUCKUPS. That is how much we love you.

Related description

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IS A MISNOMER

— Why?

Because INTELLIGENCE — LIFE, the producer of PhD:s in explicit, and other World Wide Internet Sucking Aces — has no content or context of DECISION, RECOGNITION ONLY,

— while AI world Wide Business enterprise boarding directors does not have any OTHER daily activity to work WITH THAN decision.

Life — intelligence — contanis zero decision.

—You were saying?

World Business Enterprise Cookie Aces:

— Intellectually retarded. Cannot communicate civilization. Uses humanity for Trafficking Profit, Power, Control — by DRIFT (the retarded aspect). Not by plan.

Not one word human right recognition.

THE AI CONCEPT AND WORLD WIDE BUSINESS DEVELOPERS AND CONSTRUCTORS:

World Business Enterprise Cookie Artificial Intelligence Aces (WBECAIA)

—————————————————————————————————————————

MY PROOF — ON YOUR CERTIFICATION:

Human right recognition has zero connectivity to DECISION (Profit). The WBECAIA personnel does not understand the concept.

Explain:

Human right recognition has zero connectivity to

value (the WBECAIA personnel’s most beloved pet),

trend, investments, manipulating power and general ego greed. These are the foremost business enterprise characteristics WHEN THE HUMAN INTELLECT BECOMES DETACHED FROM HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNITION: intelligence. WBECAIA personnel, world state administrations, have absolutely no idea at all, ”Are you a member?”. Its personnels’ intellectual LINE is perfectly OK. But it cannot handle Intelligible — human right recognizing — traffic ON IT (P1). Not even close.

”Are you a member?”: ”Members receive discounts” public advertising — because every body knows the aim is, of course the nice and kind Business Enterprise, to REDUCE its income, helping the customer to feel more comfortable and familiar — never human trafficking the customer ”May we use you to milk more money from” to PUSH OUT MORE PURCHASING ACTIVITY TO RAISE THE INCOME extract more money out of, taking advantage of the electronic opportunity of Mind Raping Business Trafficking Humanity, caught in a mind business raping web. No coercive handling at all. Very educated, informative personnel: police, prosecutor, court. The moment the WBECAIA personnel gets it, if at all, the debate is already over: CAI died. Cookie Artificial Intelligence. Humanity resurrected. Now: tell me I'm a liar.

Stop killing humanity.

Recognition.

GravitationElectricity: Dandelion

EUROPEAN COUNCILS AND ADMINISTRATIONS: where were you when these were laid? And how much RESPECT is THEM paid FROM you? Say it: none. You exclude violence refusers from society, those you were expected to protect, promote and respect, and dress your so fascistic jurisdictional courts up with a heap of provably retarded intellectually disabled whose only interest is to exercise obedience and punishment, especially to humans who represent the lowest possible threat to their fellow humans: none. You should be ashamed. But the level of your mental apprehension does not even allow that. You have no moral, no conscience. All you care about is your own highly beloved fascistic oppressive authority. That is how much we love you. Provisions. Defense: you can’t handle civilization, not jurisdiction, not morality.

Correct if faulty — no faulty statements are allowed in this presentation:

European Councils and their associated: representing the absolute lowest possible trash in the history of humanity:

Persecuting violence refusers (INTERPOL) by aim of punishment — for disobedience. The most harmless of all humans.

Not one word human right recognition.

Millions (45 000 000) of web sites ”We care bout your privacy”.

Not one word human right recognition.

World state authorities and administrations are careless.

• More interest in practicing obedience and punishment over humanity, than teaching and educating humanity in the art of a decent conduct:

A29.1 UDHR10Dec1948:

“ Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.”

— It would be a profoundly good example if the World State Administrative Aces could present humanity with one single educative example. But this is the situation:

Proof @Internet (10Mar2024):

Not one word human right recognition.

EX: Swedish Court: “That is not our cause”.

State authorities demand others to serve what they themselves cannot understand.

Not one word human right recognition.

The Individually surveilled Cow In Slot is told — never asked. never invited to argue on own words.

INTERNET COOKIES RELATED DEFINITION:

TRAFFICKING HUMANITY FOR MANIPULATING PURPOSES.

— A separately developed (generally world business enterprise) world wide cultural ELECTRONICALLY MANAGED movement has entered humanity with a 100% zero connection to HumanRight recognition mentionings, remindings or other human right approvements/approbations:

Not one word human right recognition.

EXAMPLE: Microsoft GOOGLE ASSOCIATED suckers: an Internet Mar2024 search on COOKIES:

Not one word human right recognition.

— We could as well replace all the hits from the Internet COOKIE search with this first phrase:

— »WE ARE NOT INTERESTED IN YOUR INDIVIDUAL OPINION». Not one word A29.1. Not 1 example.

Refuses human computer rights: Cannot handle physics. Cannot handle mathematics.

See more detailed in Resolution 217.

It is a general — by drift, not plan — attack upon the essence of humanity. Disclaim.

Conclusion: Dandelion ¦ TheProvider

The EUROPEAN CONVENTION DOES NOT RECOGNIZE UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS — SUSPENDED [1948+] AND REPLACED BY Continued European Authoritative Jurisdictional Emperorship — DICTATING ”DEMOCRACY”

Humanity is held in an authoritative jurisdictionally dictated violence based mental prison of obedience and punishment, unaware of the content and context in universal human right recognition details in every day living. Disclaim DEFENSE.

European convention: — Back off. Universal human right recognition it is. Europe today cannot handle civilization. No way. Not even close.

DEFENSE is not to preserve a nation, a structure of regional human populated way of cultural conduct. DEFENSE is to protect universal human right recognition as ”the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”. Back off. Restart.

“the free and full development of his personality”

EXPERIENCE

“ recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family” as

“ the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”

stands today (Mar2024) completely unrepresented in the foremost sayings and writings from media, state administrative instances, justice departments, court personnel with associated, and other “every individual and every organ of society” vital domains in a human civilized society: Not one word human right recognition. Not even a hint. A complete silence. As if never heard of. Violence reigns society (has completely taken over) in a seemingly never ending expanding trend:

a foundation of NO-freedom, NO-justice and NO-peace:

NO crime combat, NO crime prevention, NO security promotion:

NOT ONE WORD HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNITION. Not a spell.

Not one single word or reminder.

The “teaching and education” aspect, intended to secure an fundamental INSIGHT “of the greatest importance” INTO a human adult daily experience of the CONTENT and CONTEXT in The Universal Human Right Domain — LIFE — based on a such insight into a “free and full development of his personality”, is never mentioned. Never spoken of. Never reminded. Never referred to. Humanity in general has no idea of its content and context. And some even react with anger and aggressive and hostile conduct when reminded. Court: Europe.

INSTEAD a highly populated feasting world wide INTERNET COOKIE No One Word Human Right Recognition Party Center has established in no time (2015¦18+), populated by so provably retarded, low educated and intellectually disabled electronically managed business enterprise engineering Top Aces, spending their highly public appreciated day on dictating — always telling, never asking, never inviting for development and improvement on concrete arguments — supremacy over the computer using individual, stressing him to raise into a new level of understanding named EXPERIENCE: Now, as a tagged cattle with an individually surveilled slot named Profile, where the collected data on the privacy intruded individual Cow is used to shape — laser beam burn, jurisdictionally bought electromagnetic signal trafficking rights — a better idea of the individual, INTO the individual, (very high IQ stuff — for RENTAL only), than the individual himself,

forcing the Cow to tap a button for accessing public, food, weather, and general medical and scientifical information,

coined “enhanced experience”. Otherwise: no access.

— Are you a member?

CowExample: Conclusion

InternetMar2024: a gazillion number of websites:

“.. enhance/improve/»betterize» your experience ..”

Is that a result of “Special Scientifically Based Revelations from The Lord”,

or just a sophisticated suer exercising mind raping dictatorship

from an already obviously retarded?

— It is the retarded alternative, isn’t it? Say. [Look at the way they smile ..]. No contact (»derailed locomotive»).

Recognition.

PROVING THE PROBABLY MOST RETARDED INTELLECTUALLY DISABLED LOW EDUCATED HUMAN BEINGS INSIDE THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY ACADEMY SET OF COUNCILS AND JURISDICTIONALLY POSTS:

Retarded, low educated, intellectually disabled with zero understanding of a basic human right recognition capability: not one word human right recognition: »Get the fuck out of my beach».

They don’t understand the concept of human right recognition basics — ALTHOUGH THE FACT THAT CHILDREN, AND EVEN ANIMALS, SHOW AN EXCELLENT APPREHENSION OF THE CONTENT AND CONTEXT: natural science.

NATURAL PRACTICAL SCIENCE. No decision — only perpetually unbroken continuous 24/7 recognition. INSTRUMENTATION. Solving, analyzing, associating, reflecting, cogitating. Recognition. NATURE. DirectAccess.

— CookieFuckUp, CFU: What was it you did say about EXPERIENCE, did you say? Did you say something?

The only RELATABLE thing a CFU CAN know about EXPERIENCE is what it can see from the inside of its own created mentally retarded fucked up not one word human right recognition prison. Say again: electronics ♦ mechanics ♦ computer technology [DAMN YOU MICROSOFT — not one word human right recognition enterprise — and its jurisdictionally World Wide copyright bought bitches, THAT BLOCKS HUMANITY FROM DEVELOPING ITS INNATE POWERFUL SKILLS, MILKING OUT EVERY PENNY IT CAN, NOT ALLOWING A PERSON TO OWN A PERSONAL PROPERTY, BLOCKING HUMANITY FROM AN INDIVIDUAL HUMAN’S INTEREST IN COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, INSPECTING AND SURVEILLING AND DICTATING, NEVER PROMOTING AND ALLOWING AN OPEN ACCESS, A FREE AND LIBERATED SCIENCE, NEVER PROMOTING IT, FORCING HUMANITY TO KNEEL BEFORE IT ON A LEVEL WORSE THAN THE STONE AGE, DAMN THAT AND ITS WORLD WIDE HUMAN TRAFFICKING MIND RAPING humanity strangling JURISDICTIONAL ENTERPRISE];

— All RECOGNITION SKILLS: no decision. Simple CPU routines: request, acknowledge, enable, disable .. WORKSHOP INSTRUMENTATION — the real steel heart of experimental scientific progress: Direct Nature Confirmation.

— CFU: Emigrate to Pluto. The Cookie World Enterprise cannot handle computers, not mathematics, not physics, not moral, not culture, not civilization, not a dialog: nothing at all. Disclaim — Give examples on Human Progress. 1.

Recognition: CowEXAMPLE

The CURE: EUROPEAN AND WORLD STATE ADMINISTRATION INSTANCES — comparing Resolution 217:

RECOGNITION — NOT DECISION

Gravitation, electricity — heat, light, magnetism: LIFE. Consequential Mathematics.

BIOLOGY. BIOCHEMISTRY. MECHANICS. ARCHITECTURE. MEDICINE. HEALTH AND CARE. GEOLOGIC ISOTOPIC COMPOSITION.

— Who are you?

THEY — EUROPEAN AND WORLD STATE ADMINISTRATION INSTANCES — DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT LEVEL OF MENTAL APPREHENSION:

— They are BRED on a mental level of DECIDING and COMMANDING — never RECOGNIZING: human right recognition.

— And?

— If they are not allowed to Decide and Command — only to recognize — they become (very) ANGRY and AGGRESSIVE,

as if someone is trying to take a God Lord Ordained FREEDOM from them.

— Again: Retarded, culturally and morally really low educated, so intellectually disabled human adult state administrating co-workers. Solidly determined to realize a continuing Deciding and Commanding Agenda on Humanity: killing trees and other alike typical authority: killing humanity BY DRIFT, not plan.

MODERN: 1800+ ACADEMY: a life attacking instance appears on Earth: science — on proclaiming supreme authority over life: a social scientifical humanity destructor. AiCookies — Recognition

Disclaim: Natural forests are self protecting [ in several ways ]: Where does a lightning strike? Nowhere. Humans (1800+) start bald cutting forests: plenty of openings appear: destructed natural forest protection. The entire forest structure has become compromised. Where does a lightning NOT strike? Wildfires increase exponentially. No wildfires before 1800. SOURCE: CONSEQUENTIAL MATHEMATICS. Disclaim.

— »IF WE CAN'T IMPRISON VIOLENCE REFUSERS FOR DISOBEDIENCE, PUNISH THEM, HOW ARE WE SUPPOSED TO UPHOLD A SOCIETY BUILT ON LAW AND ORDER?».

— “If you don't GET yourself a certificate of Idiocy, these police intrusions with kidnapping and abduction will continue”. Sweden.

European Court and its administrating jurisdictional system. Not one word human right recognition:

— Stop GENERATING YOUR OWN CRIMES AGAINST an ALREADY EXISTENT LIFE SYSTEM already highly built on law and order.

— And when — if — IT EVENTUALLY hears that, IT becomes angry and aggressive, as if attacked by some evil. That defines: intellectually disabled. Retarded. The Line in IT works OK. By IT has no active traffic: intellectually disabled.

— The “free and full development of his personality” is disabled. Why? Ask IT:

— EUROPE: Why are you disabling a free and full development of the individual human personality?

— IT cannot answer

(other that this: because individual humans are our territorial property, as we are Ministers of God: Paul Obedience Teaching during 2000 years of bloody history).

— IT gets angry and aggressive — if opposed. IT is captured in a social and cultural COMA. Compare Resolution 217.

— They are SO BY THEIR OWN BLINDNESS INHIBITED — disabled — to communicate civilization on a human right recognizing foundation. Intrinsically impossible. The concept does not exist in their mental horizon. Disclaim.

ORIGIN:

— The Paul Man Obedience and Punishment Teaching fascistic idea of the Nature of the divine. (Comparing quoted Jesus man sayings).

— Practiced in Europe during 2 000 years. Definitely a fascistic obedience-punishment enterprise.

Tell them:

— Emigrate to Pluto;

— You belong to an intellectually retarded, truth denying, intellectually disabled part of humanity, bred on its own greed for power and control, and violent behavior. In your footprints of history follows only destruction. You cannot handle civilization. Disclaim. Exemplify.

— You have nothing to do here with your Deciding and Commanding than generating further destruction.

Make us happy and show we are wrong.

IS THIS A VOICE OF NATURE, say:

How can the European population have any knowledge at all about ”the will of the people” when bred during 200 years to practice obedience, solidarity and loyalty to a 1800+ fascistic self proclaimed regional violence exercising authority, forcing the people to collaborate on laws of violence under threat of punishment, dictating it to be coined as ”democracy”? Clearly — asshole: fuck you. The populations are held imprisoned, denied their rightful insight into the universal human right recognizing level of knowledge, so that the Authorities are safely provided with a continued slave trade also for the future. Study Defense: the point you clearly missed. You sick fuck.

— Get the fuck out of my beach.

Not one human right recognizing wording. Not a sound. Bitter, silent, aggressive opposition. Not one word.

— »If they can, they will harm you — with bitter bragging». We have seen it.

— Disclaim.

CIVILIZATION SHOULD BE BUILT WITH TENDERNESS AND CARE.

Children — and animals even — handles that on the finest best.

But EUROPE (1800+) has destructed every part of that, replacing it with a highly beloved attitude of fascism, power, and control.

— The populations are bred during 200 years to show obedience, solidarity and loyalty to Authority. Nobody dare to protest.

IQ Example Europe: RELATIVITY THEORY was used by the modern academic community (1905+) as a provisional substitute for an inability in the modern academic community to understand the basics of universal physics and mathematics: classical physics, which was not allowed by modern academia (1800+) to finish on its introduced Kepler-Galilei-Newton foundation. It does not connect reality, but favors a spectacular, highly primitive delusive idea of its fully related Kepler-Galilei-Newton-Planck foundational nature. AllKeplerMath+. Read it and weep.

Resolution217Short:

Recognition

Resolution 217(A) ¦ UDHR10Dec1948 i.e., Resolution 217 A(111) 10Dec 1948

Resolution 217 (Jan2024+) in overviewing details

It so happened by a simple numerical test: h — r/217 = PyramidBase with a 99.9999832% certainty — rJCIRCLEbasics: Planck’s constant h=mcr and mJ Earth Mass mathematics

FULLY EXPLAINING THE FLINDERS PETRIE MEASURES ON THE CHEOPS PYRAMID FROM 1881

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

NEVER (as such in the overall picture) INCLUDED IN THE MODERN ACADEMIC TEACHING SYSTEM

— And it never will be. Not even on my best day. No way.

———————————————

AllKeplerMath ¦ TheAtomicNucleus ¦ EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATIONS ¦ TheSolarEclipses ¦ MULTIPLEc ¦ TheGPSexample ¦ ThePerihelionPrecessions ¦ LightAndGravitation

Kepler area momentum (K=vr=2A/t) with mass (J=mvr=mK) defines Angular momentum. Using light's universal constant vacuum propagation velocity (v=c=c0=2.99792458 T8 M/S) gives the Kepler mass area momentum the status of the Planck constant universal angular momentum h=mcr=6.62559 t34 JS. As such, it is a related equivalent definition of The Neutron (Chadwick 1932), h=mN×c0×rN = NeutronMass × c0 × NeutronGravityCircleSpinRadius (1.32 Fermi). Or as termed here in UH (UniverseHistory) related physics and mathematics: The Planck Ring; mass (mechanics, gravitation), charge (light physics, electricity), spin (mobility; dynamics).

———————————————

CheopsPyramidEQUATION — Golden Section GS solidified ¦ PetriePyramidANGLE ¦ Resolution217 — »We are just warming up»

And in deducing (c0) light's gravitational dependency (Einstein, Schwarzchild, Related Physics) on a necessary preserved maximum light propagation velocity quantity (c=c0) INDEPENDENT OF GRAVITATIONAL INFLUENCE (Standard Universal), there is only one, nothing but one, and nothing else but only one single one specifically known mathematical foundational function having such capability. It is the here coined related physics and mathematics type bd=h² CHEOPS RECTANGLE (term etymological background). It leads us to TNED (Toroid nuclear electromechanical dynamics: 1980¦91+). THE DEDUCTION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL ATOM — THE NEUTRON. Also the fundamental atomic nucleus on the already so noted universal h=mcr quantum Planck constant foundation: The Planck Ring Fractal Structure of Mass (PlanckRING 1): gravitation (PlanckRING 2).

———————————————

SPECTRUM AND QUANTUM NUMBERS ¦ THE PERIODIC SYSTEM ¦ THE ELECTRON ¦ LIGHT POLARIZATION ¦ Planck Structural Fractal Constant ¦ ELEMENTARY StarPhysics ..

Examining the experimentally measured and tabled atomic weights/masses (HOP, CODATA and others), a corresponding NEUTRON SQUARE neutral experimental unaffected atomic max18e mass defect chart appears through deduced Elliptic Equations. Exposing a most tight experimental match, the first (2003) results suggested an outclassing summary to the corresponding modern academic theoretical (Weizsäcker Equation Details, mid 1960s) equative solutions (liquid drop model).

As partly tricky the Weizsäcker equation is to handle — it has perpetually been subject to later academic computer modeling parametric modifications in the academic attempt to adopt its design to experimental results. The Weizsäcker equation exposes different versions through the decays, which we cal follow and compare with the Planck Ring TNED results. Especially in the beginning of the nuclear chart it is clear that modern liquid drop nuclear theory will never — ever — approach the very tight close experimentally related toroid nuclear Planck Ring solution. No way. Not even close to.

(Comparing related with academic nuclear physics Oct2023 ¦ ComparingNUCLEAR ¦ Difference between atomic and nuclear).

(DeducingTHErZ ¦ WorldCollectedAngeliTNEDNuclearSizeDATA). The end picture (WorldCollectedNuclearData) receives a resolution of its own in PlusCUBEgraph: all collected nuclear size data, compared with the related physics and mathematics.

Modern academic nuclear modeling computer aces continue to chase the Weizsäcker parametric compositions to mimic the modern academic interpreted nuclear experimental results. As the experiment however demands an ionized — mass pumped — atom, the experiment can never compete with a Neutron Square Matrix System Neutral atomic mass defect solution. Not even close. There will always be a significant difference.

Further examination of the TNED Planck Ring results (General cosmological evolution: AllKeplerMath) on AtmosBiosLitos Earth crust isotopic compositions from (three independent) different encyclopedic sources (CWON from CAP) exposes further connection to a general explaining picture of our Earth biological life details (BioEK1-10).

»We were just warming up» ..

In Nov2017 a simple EARTH-rJCIRCLE test on the PlanckRING TNED Neutron max density (Dmax) quantity was performed. And as the reader can see (EARTHrJCIRCLEequation) the scale proportions suggest “a perfect match” — on a related Golden Section Matrix System Solution (GSPyramidMatrix). That directly connects to the above illustrated »Cheops Pyramid EQUATION». Further tests on Petrie's measured quantities did, as related in Resolution217, fully confirm that suggestion.

The central part — itself uncovered by Petrie (Petrie Breaks The Enigmatic Ice) — was apparently never fully mathematically exploited by Petrie (or later). It (now fully — TheSecondEquation) explains the basic PLAN of the edifice (not only the Cheops Pyramid, as also Petrie noted). That heAB equation, including the (never by Petrie himself, what we know calculated) central Petrie results, is included in the above illustration:

— The heAB equation (partly iterative) directly proves the (apparently hidden) Cheops Rectangle — Cheops Pyramid — Golden Section Matrix solution on the outer (original) casing angular slope: exactly ARCtan 1/√R = 51° 49' 38.25'' rather than the Petrie (table weighted evaluated, North) 51° 53' 20'' ± 1', respectively a general 51° 52' ± 2' (Petrie's “CASING RESTORED” Plate 11). That clarification did not appear here until Jan2024.

It should be noted that this (»The Petrie working group missed the point») remark does not question Petrie's results and presented values. Petrie himself stresses (at different passages in his text) the bad (and poor) conditions of the remainings, and the difficulty in concluding reasonable results on these. See further more detailed in Resolution 217.

ALL PETRIE DATA in this production are COLLECTED, QUOTED AND SAMPLED FROM

THE PYRAMIDS AND TEMPLES OF GIZEH, William Flinders Petrie 1883

W. M. Flinders Petrie 1883 — @INTERNET Ronald Birdsall, 2003-14

http://www.ronaldbirdsall.com/gizeh/petrie/index.htm

Summation and Conclusion — the short version:

———————————————————————

If nothing (more) revolutionary comes up as (even) more shiny beacons over these presented statements, nullifying them as less sophisticated crap, our history in our culture, time and epoch seems embarrassingly deeply primitive.

— EARTH rJCIRCLE Planck constant Radiocarbon Dating. Script. Flinders Petrie's measured Cheops Pyramid 1883. There you go. Those who built the Cheops Pyramid knew TNED; the EARTH rJCIRCLE equation. Resolution 217. Have a nice day.

PrivacyIntelligenceRecognition: Resolution217Short

22Mar2024

PRIVACY, INTELLIGENCE AND ITS RECOGNITION

IN OUR WORLD 2024

PRIVACY ¦ INTELLIGENCE ¦ ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

WeCaaYoPi: 24Mar2024 PrivacyIntelligenceRecognition

The Increasing Automated no human connected World Wide Internet Human Right Violations

THE INTERNET INCREASING MIND DICTATING MACHINERY (Mar2024)

”WE CARE ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY”

Not one word human right recognition.

THERE IS AN INCREASING NUMBER OF APPEARING COERCIVE INTERNET SITE ACCESS BLOCKING MESSAGES,

from earlier free and open access Internet web sites

DEMANDING COOKIES CONSENT UNLESS CONTINUED 24/7 BLOCKED ACCESS, AND OF THIS TYPE

”WE CARE ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY”:

Meaning:

— No you don't. You don't understand the concept:

— THE INDIVIDUAL ADDRESSING APPARENTLY is introducing a direct coercive machine dictating established world human mind rape and dictatorship, on computer programmed prompted human phrasing imitations, zero connecting Intelligence. Pretending to be the human's best pal, the rape connects to and defines the UN formulation of direct Human Trafficking:

Not one word human right recognition. Oppression introduced — by drift, not plan: the retarded aspect.

— Disclaim:

On drift, not plan (the retarded aspect): STRESSING TO STEAL A POSITION OF SUPERIORITY

BY FRAUDULENT COERCIVE PERSUASION (UN Trafficking), APPEARING AS A HUMAN'S BEST PAL

”WE CARE ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY”.

has no human right recognition call, no reminder or any of its stressed or other content or context in it.

(Reminded: OECD and GPAI commitments ..)

Described Observed Action:

BY DRIFT, NOT PLAN (the retarded aspect, further below): THE COERCIVE, FRAUDULENT, HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND DELUSIVE NO HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNIZING WORLD WIDE INTERNET ENTERPRISE SUDDEN BLOCKING OF EARLIER OPEN ACCESS PUBLIC INTERNET WEBSITES — THREATENING THE VISITOR WITH CONTINUED NO ACCESS UNTIL THE VISITOR OBEYS A COOKIES CONSENT — OF TYPE

”WE CARE ABOUT YOUR PRIVACY”,

does not contain a human right recognition mentioning, call, or reminder or any of its stressed content or context:

Clarifying:

— No you don't. You apparently do not understand the privacy concept.

— And neither the care idea.

”Privacy” and ”Care” is fed into a computer, which has no responding idea of the content or context of human right Recognition. Then distributed out @Internet with aim at blocking Internet Access for collecting/forcing cookies consent by a coercive mind raping method as exemplified. The Internet access blocked visitor becomes, in anay way, trapped in a dictating machine locked dictating spiral with zero human connectivity property.

It is or can be so interpreted a direct machine attack on human dignity — provably human organized on a retarded drift. No plan:

• Aspiration for a direct Mind manipulating Marketing: taking, steeling, selling, buying, offering, Trafficking Humanity. Slave Mind Trade. Business enterprise, World Wide Jurisdictionally Established: Manipulating Power Control. Disclaim.

• Invented and nurtured by a provably retarded, intellectually disabled administration of humans, down to the last atom

— How can you so surely state such a thing?

Not one word human right recognition.

— You were saying?

• The responsible administrators and developers do not understand the concept.

• The responsible administrators and developers do not understand what they are involved in.

• The responsible administrators and developers are only impressed by the idea of DECISION Manipulating Power Control, making it an open (slave) market — that is the retarded aspect: society degenerates in violation and intrusion.

Exposed human mind raping Character:

The machine attack on the individual victim features a provably retarded but claiming superior, informing/commanding a coerced access blocked human individual; telling, not asking, to consent, threatening to continue the blocking access if not obeyed. A mind dictating instance has established.

Not one word human right recognition. An open mind rape on humanity as a whole has established. On drift. Not plan: retarded, provably intellectually disabled and low educated human right recognition Internet Designers: zero insight into what they are involved in.

— How can you so surely state such a thing?

Not one word human right recognition.

— You were saying?

The responsible world business enterprise institutional developers and responsible don't understand the concepts of DECISION, INTELLIGENCE and its RECOGNITION (but believe these are properties of majority deciding boards, world wide governed and maintained by Business Councils and their Associated) — and that is the intellectually disabled (and retarded) aspect.

The most consequentially absurd aspect:

— So: They can freely, with zero conscience, continue to mind rape humanity, safely protected by their own ignorance.

— And that is, in explicit, the retarded aspect — provably down to the last universal atom.

— How can you so surely state such a thing?

Not one word human right recognition.

— You were saying?

ESPECIALLY AS THESE ”WE CARE FOR YOUR PRIVACY” EXTENSIVELY AND EXPANDINGLY ARE MACHINE CREATED INTERNET MESSAGES, WITH ZERO HUMAN CONNECTIVITY, A SINGLE HUMAN INDIVIDUAL IS DEFINITELY CAUGHT UP IN A MIND RAPING TRAP, TO WHICH NO HUMAN INSTANCE IS RESPONDING: ESTABLISHED WORLD INTERNET SLAVERY:

— How can you so surely state such a thing?

Not one word human right recognition.

— You mean the machine is going to certify a human right recognition too (P1, UDHR10Dec1948)?

— You were saying?

— The machine can repeat/mimic every word we say — but understands nothing of its content and context.

— How can you so surely state such a thing?

Not one word human right recognition.

— You were saying?

There is (also) one specific universal special domain a machine cannot respond to:

— It cannot inform the AI developers that they are retarded, intellectually disabled, low educated, imbecile ego maniac fuckups.

— Why is that?

A machine (decision processing = no responding intelligence) has no human right recognition.

It will crush everything in its way, unless obeyed.

— You were saying?

(Life — knowledge: mathematics and physics, all through — is based entirely on recognition, discoveries of the already existent, never on decision, see Intelligence below — and thereby is the distinction between a human and a machine, between intelligence and its absence, absolute and sharp, provably down to the last atom. Disclaim).

(Intelligence’s smallest part: the atom in which there is only recognition — cooperation — of already existent details. Machine’s smallest part: a decision [motional] exercising material detail according to a specific, human determined, construct duty — like a transistor’s Go, NoGo).

(And the reason, what is known here, why these simple definitions/clarifications are not found in the modern academia teaching system is NOT that this author is more intelligent than any other. No way. Absolutely not. But because the modern academia all from 1800+ took on a really bad attitude towards natural intelligence).

Back off:

IN A HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNIZING SENSE, ALL PUBLIC MACHINE PROGRAMMED COMMUNICATION ACTIVITY — not one word human right recognition — WITH HUMANS SHALL BE FORBIDDEN (slavery, A4 UDHR10Dec1948: mind oppression, retarded mind dictatorship. Disclaim): forbid forced AI CHAT.

— Stupid idiotic machine human mind rape control — developed by provably retarded humans.

— How can you so surely state such a thing?

Not one word human right recognition.

— You were saying?

— I am not asking. I am telling. It will be so — if human rights recognition shall be respected. In to the last atom.

Respect Zero decision. 100% recognition. Life. Human rights recognition. Resolution 217(A). 24/7. No breaks.

Stop killing humanity.

Consequential Mathematics. 24/7. No breaks.

Shorter:

— Back off.

— Get the fuck out of my beach.

GUARD ..

Intelligence: 100% RECOGNITION. zero decision: LIFE

WeCaaYoPi

• Purposeful sharing of resources:

• 100% absence of Decision;

• Spontaneous Atomic Unions (The Periodic System of The Elements);

• Spontaneous Evolution of Life through Protected and Promoted Biodiversity (Earth environment — before Europe);

• A Fly does not make decisions on Flying. Flies just fly. No Decision.

• People in a room practicing tenderness and care do not decide where, when and what to touch. They just touch. No Decision.

• Children and animals running, jumping and playing, do not decide where and when. They just run, jump and play, with high joy.

• LIFE — the natural aspect of dignity and respect recognition for all individuals — does not make decisions. It just lives.

• We call it freedom from slavery, ”the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”, never reminded in EU:

— The European Convention, the European Union: not one word human right recognition. Not even a daily hint. Box. Dark.

Best found candidate:

THE HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNIZING DEFINITION OF INTELLIGENCE

Recognition. Not Decision. Disclaim. Consequential Mathematics (COMA).

Nature (Simard2012): biodiversity structure — and its network Defense;

Gravitation, electricity — light, heat, magnetism:

— LIFE: (Simard2012): intelligence defined: ”purposeful sharing of resources”:

• defended and protected biodiversity

— ending (farthest) some 200 000 ¦ 50 000 years ago in the fully biodiversity life protected developed human form.

intelligence: ”purposeful sharing of resources”; zero decision – 100% recognition: LIFE MATRICES.

Basic Chlorophyll and Hematin — plant and animal life biology

The Assembly of The Human Individual

————————————————

Purposeful sharing of resources

LIFE: THE PERIODIC SYSTEM OF THE ELEMENTS: the Nature of The Atom — and its connection to biological life matrices: nuclear physics — beginning from the Planck constant (h) The Neutron: h=mcr. No decisions. No way. Not even close.

— Humans cannot create it — but the present (EU) representation acts as if it would be possible.

— If attempted to be tampered, it generates destruction and devastation: Defense. Disclaim.

Explain:

The retarded aspect

• Where attempts appear to overrun the sharing aspect in intelligence — life supporting recognition — (by significant interest in power and control over life and human conduct), the individual enters a provable intellectually degenerating path characterized by a retarded — significantly associative decreased — capability to associate, reflect on and cogitate basic human life details — such as human right recognition basics (which are excellently performed by children and even animals): it does no longer connect, and the person becomes a stranger to its natural content and context (developing ideas of personal mind kicking supremacy and mind authority over others). It is a state of life knowledge degeneration (fragmenting and killing the individual human child). Disclaim.

— It becomes especially funny to remind in front of those who believe themselves to stand above others.

ArtificialIntelligence: 23Mar2024 Intelligence

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER

"Artificial intelligence must be grounded in human rights, says High Commissioner"

https://www.ohchr.org/en/statements/2023/07/artificial-intelligence-must-be-grounded-human-rights-says-high-commissioner

Yes. We get the point. But Europe is not most famous for a 24/7 reminding of human right recognition (P8, UDHR10Dec1948). And neither is United Nations (ISRAEL): There is an apparent and profound lack of RELATED PROVABLE UNDERSTANDING. Explain:

Statement:

— ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IS A MISNOMER. Why?

— "Artificial" intelligence has no connection to intelligence. Why?

— Aiming at a DECISION (machine controlled and surveilled individual Cow) along with INTELLIGENCE, defines OPPRESSION.

— What, exactly, is meant by that — stop talking in riddles, please. Explain in detail:

— BECAUSE IN LIFE EVOLUTION, CERTIFYING A HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNITION, THERE IS NO DECISION. ONLY LIFE.

— You were saying?

— ATOMS OF THE UNIVERSAL PERIODIC SYSTEM OF THE ELEMENTS MAKES NO DECISIONS WHEN SPONTANEOUSLY UNITING TO LIFE MATRIX SYSTEMS, ENDING ON HIGH COMMISSIONERS, PhD:S AND THE LIKE MOST PROFOUND EARTH WORLD FUCKED UP ACES, THIS AUTHOR INCLUDED. THEY JUST UNITE TO LIFE MATRIX SYSTEMS. NO DECISIONS. JUST RECOGNITION OF WHAT ALREADY IS: INTELLIGENCE.

— You were saying?

— So, provably down to the last universal atom: HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNITION ENTAILS ZERO DECISION, RECOGNITION ONLY.

Artificial intelligence IS a misnomer — so now provably and apparently and relatedly based on a highly ego tripping retarded, low educated, intellectually disabled pool of the most world educated established PhD Aces. Say again. Disclaim.

Not one word human right recognition.

— Control. Commanding DECISION. Supreme DECISION. Superior DECISION over Inferior Cow. Oppression. Fascism. Come again.

On DRIFT. Not plan — the retarded aspect. Disclaim. Faulty statements are NOT allowed here.

— "Artificial" intelligence has no connection to intelligence. No way. Not even close.

— The “artificial” is aiming at/as a computer processing DECISIONS DEVICE ending on A COMMANDING (MACHINE) AUTHORITY

— type Car Driving Authority, removing the natural human response and judgment to a type »Alzheimer’s Trash Can — best recovering therapy: visit a bald cut — most popular forest owners’ Hi IQ pet», insulting humanity: no responsibility teaching and education. »Kill humanity enterprise jurisdictions».

— Also (especially in Banking) these days popularly forced onto the world population to CHAT with — the most RELATED stupid humiliating invented of all the stupid in human history — effectively hiding and blocking human right recognizing teaching and education FROM AT ALL REACHING humanity (P8):

— It reflects a world wide system of retarded, low educated and intellectually disabled world state administrations — WITH associated educative institutions. Mathematics and Physics: TheLIST.

— You were saying?

— But WHEREAS the Aces World Councils already are So familiar, THEY don't have to give a shit on that either.

— THEY call/dictate it: Democracy. Open public slavery human mind trafficking. Artificial intelligence.

At best: handicap aid (Max 15 in City traffic, with warning sign: handicap CPU controlled vehicle).

Because a decided ACTION outside a human right recognized content and context, has only a power mandate to destroy.

— How can you so surely state such a thing?

Not one word human right recognition.

— You were saying?

There is no artificial intelligence. No way. Not even close.

Intelligence is reserved for human right recognition — only: LIFE. No decision. No state authority. Compare: Defense.

Resolution 217 — Resolution 217(A) — Resolution217Short.

— You were saying?

Decision:

Disclaim:

DECISION IN EXPLICIT — can be understood, related, exemplified and explained as

• Intentionally aiming and aspiring at one specific (processing) certain result given a number of alternatives.

Two ways:

1. Including a preserved life providing recognition (Intelligence — Resolution 217(A) UDHR10Dec1948):

• The result has equal dignity independent of number of alternatives (human right recognized democracy, the only true one).

2. Excluding a preserved life providing recognition (»Artificial intelligence» — by drift, not plan: a retarded society: fascism):

• The result has only power to destroy, independent of number of alternatives (unproclaimed fascistic practiced democracy: the populations are forced to obey a self proclaimed regional jurisdictional authority — Europe 1800+ — under threats of punishment if not obeyed, and so during centuries: a degenerating society develops with a population fostered to expose a loyal and solidaric attitude, consent and conduct towards the so slave driving and human trafficking human right blocking and attacking authorities: retarded, low educated, intellectually disabled state administrative world systems). GUARD ..

DECISION — THE HUMAN retarded IDEA OF A

POWER OF AUTHORITY

— »Us. We. Councils. Majority decisions. Democracy. Board deciding directors’ resolutions. We rule the world. OECD. GPAI ..».

Its dictating organization:

— »HUMAN RIGHTS IS A GIFT FROM THE DEMOCRATIC DECIDING AUTHORITIES TO THE PEOPLE TO MAKE THEM FEEL MORE COMFORTABLE IN A CONTINUED LIFE WITH OBEDIENCE AND PUNISHMENT. WE CREATED IT. AND IT HAS NO SELF AWARENESS, AS SOME SPECIFIC FUCKUPS CLAIM. WE, THE WORLD STATE ADMINISTRATION COUNCILS, OWN IT. AND YOU, INDIVIDUAL, DO AS YOU ARE TOLD. AND THAT IS THE END OF IT».

— »You have a problem with that?»

— Yes. I have a problem with that. And a very huge one too. Very.

Not one word human right recognition.

— Retarded, low educated, intellectually disabled. Intelligence is fine. But the interest in its content is apparently and provably overridden by the interest in control of power and authority, a fundamental mental blindness to nature as is (children and animals handles it gallantly). Human right recognition — natural in children and even animals — has an enormous potential of carrying an adult communicating traffic, developing humanity and culture. But in this present world of ours (Mar2024), it is covered in oblivion by an established world wide state administrative attitude of a constantly upright daily public pissing on its foundation. It is as if not existent at all.

— How can you so surely state such a thing?

Not one word human right recognition.

— You were saying?

EUROPEAN AUTHORITIES keep their native children in a general 8-18 one decade quarantine. So that when they are around 20, there is not much left of them other than a strongly bred rank of solidaric and loyal inferior nationally mind serving slave fucked up population, apparently not at all aware of A29.1. in UDHR10Dec1948, constantly improving on criminality and violation:

” Everyone has duties to the community in which alone

the free and full development of his personality is possible.”,

A29.1, UDHR10Dec1948.

— You were saying?

— The local European state national authoritative personnel exercising on their beloved retarded aspect: intellectually disabled, low educated, provably down to the very last universal atom, does not allow a free and full development of human individuals in Europe 1800+ — by drift. Not plan, the intellectually disabled aspect with zero human right recognition, only authoritative decision.

— Violence refusers have no human rights. Such must be punished. European Convention.

— And if The Authorities hear that (police, prosecutor, court — the loyal public), they become angry and aggressive, behaving as if something evil is about to kill their long practiced culture of highly beloved and deeply praised fascistic ideation: obedience and punishment. God help the objector.

— The lowest possible in the human history.

Europe (1800+) don’t understand the concept of Detailed Related DEFENSE. Disclaim.

— You were saying?

Instead of promoting it, strengthening it, it is bullied, persecuted, mistreated, inviting further violence to reign in the societies. And the authorities understand nothing of the concept:

” Everyone has duties to the community in which alone

the free and full development of his personality is possible.”,

A29.1, UDHR10Dec1948.

— You were saying?

” No one shall be held in slavery or servitude;

slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.”,

A4, UDHR10Dec1948.

— You were saying?

” Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person

any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act

aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.”,

A30, UDHR10Dec1948.

Exactly what happened with the birth of The European Convention:

universal human right recognition (P1): suspended.

Human right violation. Obedience and punishment. No teaching. No education (P8).

— »Because we are the emperors of humanity». Disclaim. Fascism. Oppression.

— You were saying?

Europe (1800+), short history:

— Decision.

— Never recognition. Not even close.

— 24/7 human mind raping, dictating — coined ”democracy”, coercive fraudulent immoral conduct:

— ”The will of the people” as fostered to show solidarity and loyalty with the authorities during 200 years (1800+) of forced authoritative collaboration under threats of punishment unless cooperating and showing submission.

— Good Dog.

— ”Democracy”. The will of the people. Unknown in Europe (1800+).

— You were saying?

— ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTRODUCED — compensating the generally European low educated level of intelligence in being constantly raped by Crime: Stronger, better decisive power. Deeper matrix resolving resolutions. More control over the individual Cow.

— »And I am not excited at all .. that beautiful awaiting Power Control. My oh my. Emperor of The World (Caligula). Pleasure».

— »We enhance your experience — by blocking access until you consent and Learn How, creep, because we know what is good for you, Cow there».

— »THE WORLD STATE ADMINISTRATION COUNCILS' MAJORITY DECISIONS. YOUR EMPEROR».

— »AND DON’T YOU IMAGINE FOR A FUCKING SECOND THAT YOUR LIFE HAS ANY FUCKING MEANING OTHER THAT WE TELL YOU, YOU LOW PEACE OF SHIT».

— »Wind power comes from the Sun».

INVESTIGATING THE MATHEMATICS-PHYSICS EXPLANATION, THERE IS ONLY ONE FOUND FULLY EXPLAINING INSTANCE: EARTH ROTATION ON CORIOLIS MATHEMATICS. Disclaim.

— Never have humanity been covered in such as the present compact darkness of knowledge. European Councils. Mathematics. Physics. TheLIST.

— You were saying?

Not one word human right recognition.

present world wide — on drift, not plan — exercising dictatorship, how it works:

———————————————————————————————————

What especially The European Convention and its European Union does not understand:

DECISION

from one or one billion one

OUTSIDE HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNITION

— AND EU ARE OF COURSE THE MOST WORLD WIDE KNOWN EXPERTISE ON THAT ONE TOO —

defines exercising oppression

It exposes one and the same end picture: Fascism. Dictatorship. Nazism. Satanism. World 2024.

Not one word human right recognition.

— You were saying?

Provision:

P1, UDHR10Dec1948 [Resolution 217 (A)]:

” Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,”

CRIME COMBAT • CRIME PREVENTION • SAFETY PROMOTION — Defense: Are you a member?

every other claim, idea, opinion, association, reflective onset or draft, suggestion, sentence, writ, part or any other aspect involving even one single atom in this universe of ours,

state departments, schools, universities, high-schools, institutes and especially world wide business enterprise administrations,

defines a foundation of no-freedom (the definition of slavery), no-justice and no-peace in the world:

— How can you so surely state such a thing?

Not one word human right recognition.

— You were saying?

Conclusion with summation:

Decision outside human right recognition has only power to destroy.

There are no exceptions. None. Disclaim.

Knowledge ¦

AiCookies ¦ WikiHumanTraffic ¦ TheProvider ¦ Dandelion ¦ GravitationElectricity ¦ Conclusion ¦ CowExample ¦ Recognition ¦ Resolution217Short ¦ PrivacyIntelligenceRecognition ¦ WeCaaYoPi ¦ Intelligence ¦ ArtificialIntelligence ¦ Decision

GUARD:

BeREMINDED

4Nov2023+

— We dare say — by many, many — all of them — proving and comparing examples:

— Modern academic thinking 1800+ never understood elementary Kepler-Galilei-Newton physics-chemics-mathematics. Not even close.

Uneducated.

Low level minded. By drift. Not plan. Intelligence is fine. The idea of its content, on the contrary, is heavily underrepresented.

Irresponsible, so heavily business oriented that the concept of human right recognition is a perfect 100% abstract: not one word. Not a hint. As if not existent.

Demanding obedience and punishment.

No teaching. No education.

GUARD OF CIVILIZATION — CosmicMATHrevelation

— Out. Or do you want me to show you how it is done?

—————————————————————————————

INTELLIGENCE — natural-universal definition ¦ A PURPOSEFUL sharing of resources

— recognition: respect. Not decision. Not obedience and punishment. No Trafficking.

No use of Humanity for profiting, controlling or manipulative purpose is allowed. Not by birth. Not by nation. Not by status. Not by body. Not by mind. Not at all. Not by Microsoft. Not by Google. Not by any kind sort, type or nature of Market or Copyright or Claim. No way.

”slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms”.

THE NAMED INSTANCES PERSONNEL DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT. Not one word human right recognition. Not even a hint.

”.. every individual and every organ of society ..”

”.. of the greatest importance ..”

—————————————————————————————

COOKIES BLOCKING INTERNET SITES 2023 — still expanding; listen up:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERRUPTING THE INDIVIDUAL — »TabMindINscreen»

Pretending to be the human individual’s best Pal,

— »We care about your privacy .. Manage your privacy .. your experience .. improve ..», no access unless cookies consent

not mentioning or hinting any kind of

a basic human right recognition

“.. foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world ..”

CRIME COMBAT. CRIME PREVENTION. SAFETY PROMOTION. 24/7. Defense. Never sleep. Always awake.

“.. of the greatest importance ..”, “.. every individual and every organ of society .. constantly ..”,

DEFINES EXERCISING OPPRESSION.

The only civilized known provision separating the slick from the just:

— Get the fuck out of my beach.

INTERRUPTING THE INDIVIDUAL — Pretending to be the human individual’s best Pal — without mentioning or hinting any kind of a basic human right recognition: GUARD

NO INDIVIDUAL OWNS ANY LAND IN ANY FORM OF EXISTENTIAL MEANING OF EXCLUDING AN INDIVIDUAL HUMAN’S NATURAL BORN ADMIRATION FOR THE NATURALLY CREATED VIEWS AND THEIR SHARING JOY.

NO INDIVIDUAL HAS MORE RIGHT TO LAND THAN ANY OTHER. AND THERE IS NO DISTRIBUTING DIVINITY THAT CLAIMS SUCH ABSURD SATANISTIC IDEAS. Claim whatever you want. At any time. Universal Human Rights.

United Nations as a world institution has offended the Palestinian people, along with the rest of humanity as one — 1 — divine family. And United Nations will repay their lawful human right respect.

— Why? Because ”.. They are endowed with reason and conscience ”, and ”.. all of you are children of the most high.”.

.. ”.. inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world ..”.

.. ” .. without distiction of any kind .. such as .. birth .. ”.

DEFENSE. »DefCon3». Not one word human right recognition mentioning. Not a hint. Not a sound. Not a word. The intruder has already established in our homes. 24/7.

”Israel thus stands between God and humanity, representing each to the other.”. Further reflected and related in TheCLAIM and LAW.

And has so been during a long historical epoch. Violence knocks on madness’ door. And the slick invites it, in. Not one word:

”All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.”

United nations have to wake up to reality. Both these quoted cannot hold at the same time time. Humanity’s Mind is under rape.

— And it is the UN that has to clean up the mess: stop killing humanity’s right to be a one humanity. Get the fuck out of my beach:

— Deconsecration of a Geographic Israel, regaining a fully mindful recognized unity of humanity without distinctions. THERE IS NO OTHER WAY TO END WORLD VIOLENCE.

CRIME COMBAT — CRIME PREVENTION. SAFETY PROMOTION. 24/7. Defense. UDHR10Dec1948 — vectorMATH as it is working in human right related daily life: disclaim

HOW LONG IS THE WORLD GOING TO DENY AND IGNORE TheCLAIM?

WESTERN WORLD CHRISTIANITY, during some 2000y of PERSECUTING GEOGRAPHICALLY CLAIMING JEWS, decided to bury its Christian historical guilt of barbarism in a bit of land in eastern Mediterranean, from 1917, by making things even worse: Allowing an occupation of that already populated land, pushing away its inhabitants, favoring a geographical world wide collection establishment of a sectarianistic claim of divinity [John.8:39¦41] being so summed [»I and the father are one»] in John.8:44; ”Ye are of your father the devil ..”: apparently no divine support at all. A Den of Thieves — unless disclaimed. Getting rid of a bad conscience. Or is that also included in The Book?

WHY IS THE WORLD ACCEPTING GEOGRAPHIC ISRAEL?

”.. all of you are children of the most High”, Ps.82:6. All. Why? Why is it important for UN to justify a geographic Israel? What justifies some humans before others? With what right? ”Land promised by God”?

— Did the Palestinian people say that 1917? TheCLAIM. The UN world is no doubt covered in a deep moral delusion, especially on the spiritual plane — accepting sects to curtail and mutilate new born children:

”.. teaching and education ..” — where? Why does not UN ban such sadistic barbarism — attacking a born human beings sex, claiming the ritual to come from a divine source, why? It is condemned as quoted:

DEUTERONOMY [5Mos.10:16].10:16;

”Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart, and be no more stiffnecked.”.

JEREMIAH [Jer.4:4].4:4;

”Circumcise yourself to the LORD, and take away the foreskin of your heart, ye men of Judah and inhabitants of Jerusalem: lest my fury come forth like fire, and burn that none can quench it,because of the evil of your doings.”.

— United Nations: Why? Who are you? What are you doing? Are you promoting Satanism, Fascism, Dictatorship? Human Rape? Answer. Respond: Why TheCLAIM is a Geographic Israel accepted?

IS HUMANITY ONE FAMILY OR NOT — independent of birth? TRY TO MAKE UP YOUR MIND. The Bible has it already. ”.. all of you are children of the most High”, Ps.82:6. All.

— Attacking the sex of a defenseless new born child. Are you mad? Satanistic fascism on its top. UN: Get the ..

CRIME COMBAT — CRIME PREVENTION. SAFETY PROMOTION. 24/7. Defense. UDHR10Dec1948 — vectorMATH as it is working in human right related daily life: disclaim

CLASSIFICATION OF HUMAN INDIVIDUALS BY HUMAN INDIVIDUALS IN SUPERIOR AND INFERIOR BELONGS TO THE CLASSIC IDEA OF FASCISM, NAZISM AND SATANISM. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO IN A CIVILIZED WORLD EXCEPT ON THE THEATER AND ARCHIVED LIBRARY DOCUMENTS. ” .. teaching and education ..”. Not one word. Defense.

BeREMINDED: ITI

Dec2023

TheWillOfThePeople

IT WILL BE REMINDED.

Exemplified. Full. Related. Reminded. Compared. ESPECIALLY IN CONCERN WITH NATURE — on its explicit biological level.

A SOCIETY IN DISINTEGRATION — BY THE VIOLENCE ITSELF INTRODUCED

UDHR10Dec P1:

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Swedish official back-translation by word:

Whereas admittance of the inherent value and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human species is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

It has been reminded to the Swedish instances on the level of state administrations over twenty years ago, that the Swedish official translation is a veritable nightmare compared to the English original. There was a polite answer from the Swedish Cabinet Office and Ministries, giving thanks for the engagement in the viewpoints, suggesting a further contact if any revision would be actual. It has gone over twenty years since, with still growing and expanding ignorance of the content. Still no Swedish initiative to even let the population know of the actual — powerful English related — content and context. Above all: the apparently related and shameful Swedish authoritative attitude to the content — the idea behind — of the UDHR10Dec1948 as such. Explicitly from a Swedish Court:”That is not our cause”. Instead, Sweden conforms juridically to

The European Convention

— based on a direct highly provable violation of Article 30 in UDHR10Dec1948:

Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.

UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS — not A European Regionally Consenting Authoritative Slavery over the population: fascism conserved:

Human right recognition: suspended — and effectively prohibited.

That was exactly what Europe did (THE EUROPEAN DICTATORSHIP) in responding shortly after the UDHR10Dec1948: Special European Authoritative Human Rights. UDHR10Dec1948 was killed. Not valid. Unwanted. Unsatisfactory.

A continued dictating practiced obedience under the European authorities was underlined, demanding punishment if disobedient (INTERPOL COOPERATION). And for the rest: The European Convention’s proclaimed intellectual (interpretative) ownership pertaining to a The foundation of DEFENSE. No Universal human right recognition teaching. No education. Again: by DRIFT. Not plan.

CRIME COMBAT — CRIME PREVENTION. SAFETY PROMOTION. 24/7. Defense. UDHR10Dec1948 — vectorMATH as it is working in human right related daily life: disclaim

— The personnel does not understand the concept. Police. Prosecutor. Court. Not even close. Claim whatever you want, European Court: you’re done. It is not a threat. It is part of a havoc report. Not one word human right recognition. We might as well consult Chinese Human Rights. GUARD ..

A2 UDHR10Dec1948:

Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.

Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

AS IF OWNER OF THE INTELLECT — WITH RIGHT TO DEROGATE ALL OTHER OPINION: the ideal fascistic attitude

human authoritative consenting rules of thinking (psychiatry: society adoption: psychically disturbed law offenders) — the worst of all the human culture variant species on dictating supremacy — disclaim:

EUROPE 1800+ IN A BOX:

Birth.

The European Convention was — so, apparently — created to reject (devalue, lower) UDHR10Dec1948 as a UNIVERSAL human right recognized declaration. Apparent aim: European authorities (»intellectually disposed» due to the idea of representing a divine authority: basic classic fascistic satanistic inducements) had to continue their 1800+ introduced traditional practice on a local regional national 1800+ authoritative agenda: obedience and punishment — AS IF STILL THE OWNER AND EMPEROR OF THE INTELLECT, COMMANDING THE POPULATIONS AS IF SO KNIGHTED BY A DIVINE AUTHORITY — WITH RIGHT TO DEROGATE ALL OTHER OPINION. Obedience and punishment.

See further related parts in DEFENSE. No teaching. No education. UDHR10Dec1948 P8:

Now, therefore,

The General Assembly,

Proclaims this Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.

— The Swedish (European) population has no chance in understanding the powerful UDHR10Dec1948 essence in their native language: no teaching, no education. Example: Swedish Church still uses the word VALUE — no idea of DIGNITY — in communicating its cheer with the population for helping humanity in general on a better course. Namely: the Thing — recognition — connected to a bad conscience of NOT realizing that the INHERENT Dignity comes with BIRTH: CHILDREN (and even Animals) handles IT gallantly. But the adult species in Sweden (and especially The European Court) especially on the level of police, prosecutor and court, have no idea.

— The personnel apparently does not understand the concept. It is sequestered in a perfect adult cultural oblivion. Box. Dark.

COMPARING UNIVERSAL NATIONAL SOCIAL CULTURAL Detailed Related DEFENSE — UDHR10Dec1948 A29.1

Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

AND OF COURSE: EUROPEAN/Swedish AUTHORITIES ARE OF COURSE MOST WORLD FAMOUS FOR EXPOSING POPULATED EXAMPLES WITH A RELATED MEANING OF “free and full development of his personality” (»I am the happiest and most acquainted educated, most fulfilled, in the whole universe»). Full. The conditions for that one compared to today, apparently, were better year 1311. These present European/Swedish authoritative academia aces apparently and provably down to the last atom do not expose more of the full than the authoritative ability to exercise oppressive obedience and punishment over humanity: fascistic ideation, pulling out extensive violence over the populations by Blocking teaching and education in Universal Human Right Recognition Basics — again, by DRIFT. Not plan. Disclaim. The worst of the worst.

— The adult personnel does not understand the concept: social and cultural intellectual disability. Disclaim.

Trying — attempting — to remind these galactic cultural aces, they can NOT ONLY get pretty ANGRY, greatly aggressive and hostile — even not only ask you to leave their building, but also realizing a such performance. It has happened. The Reminder results in high upsetness, and is angrily and accusingly interpreted as an attack upon the freedom of the people. European 1800+ history in ten seconds:

Year 1800 a divine inducement prick enters Europe, forcing the populations to cooperate with violation laws under threat of punishment (only England rejected the stand).

After 200 years, young school children, still the same reign: “We live in a free, democratic society”. Sweden 2000. The populations has grown into a solidaric and loyal dependency on the national authorities (women's right to vote was introduced 1920) — where UDHR10Dec1948 is practically unknown — Loyal and Solidaric Swedish Church uses: ”value”, Sw, värde. No such terminology exists in UDHR10Dec1948. Individual opponents are classified as lower standing humans — never written, mentioned or recognized in Swedish media. The only chance of attention is: here.

A20:

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

2. No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

NO HUMAN BEING HAS ANY RIGHT TO DICTATE OR INTRODUCE ANY SORT, KIND OR NATURE OF A HUMAN AUTHORITATIVE EMPERORSHIP OVER ANY OTHER HUMAN BEING (Guard).

EUROPEAN CONVENTION IS — defines — A HUMAN RIGHT VIOLATION CONVENTION;

”slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms”.

AUTHORITIES DIVIDING LAND BETWEEN THEM, FORCING THE POPULATIONS TO COOPERATE WITH VIOLENCE LAWS UNDER THREAT OF PUNISHMENT, CLAIMING TO BE SO CONSULTED BY A DIVINE MISSION TO EXECUTE ON THIS QUOTED TYPE OF AGENCY

”MINISTER OF GOD”, APPARENTLY DEFINES THE MOST SICK OF ALL THE POSSIBLE SICK. Compare DEFENSE.

The executing personnel does not understand the concept, does not understand what they are involved in.

In Sweden (Police, Prosecutor, Court), again by DRIFT and not by plan (disabled intellect), it is imperative to NOT have a with born girl wit — aware inherent dignity — named conscience. Those few (native) who have it, are bullied — mobbed, a specially popular behavior among children against the single aberrant child — on DRIFT, no plan. Just imitating the general (Swedish) authoritative adult cocky attitude of never, ever, protesting against a violent state administrative behavior, attitude and inducement — and so harassed. Box. Dark.

TheWillOfThePeople: BeREMINDED

The loyal population inherits their tyrants’ inducements.

That is how mobbing works, its source. And that is what entertains it. A mentally deep sick culture: A perfectly healthy and decent individual shall revise itself in front of a sick — and slick: aphoristically, a Pig. It is defined Cruel Mental Humiliation. All, while the mobbing perpetrator is in a state of a strong mental excitation: executing Power. Oppression. Torture. Swedish authority mobbing a violence refuser. Full pedal. Cowards. The lowest of the low.

A21.3:

The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government

NOT THE AUTHORITATIVE EUROPEAN OR SWEDISH EMPERORSHIP OVER THE PEOPLE, DEMANDING OBEDIENCE UNDER LAWS OF PUNISHMENT. TODAYS’ ”WILL OF THE PEOPLE” ONLY REFLECTS A 200y INHERITED LOYALTY TO A FASCISTIC AND SATANISTIC DICTATING MOB OF SELF PROCLAIMED LOW EDUCATED INTELLECTUALLY DISABLED FUCK UPS, DEEPLY IN LOVE WITH FASCISTIC AUTHORITY, WITHHOLDING THE POPULATION FROM KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THEIR RIGHTFUL HUMAN RIGHTS RECOGNITION.

AND THAT IS FASCISM AND OPPRESSION, UNLESS DISCLAIMED.

The responsible executing personnel, low educated and so intellectually disabled, does not understand the concept.

To them, in their eyes, they, their institutions, represent the universes most highlighted essence of intelligence.

Disclaim. Say it: you are clean cut straight wrong. Explain.

— The population has never — ever — had any idea of what exactly “the will of the people” means. No 1800+ European way.

— Replace: “will of the violent and forced to obey slaves”. Disclaim. It pictures a veritable anarchy, claimed “law and order”.

— Disclaim: It appears as ruled by a heap of intellectually disabled Hollywood production erroneously biologically developed APES.

The entire European (world) society is, as we know (disabled intellect), ruled by majority decisions — not human right recognition. Not one word — disclaim. The population names it: Democracy. No human right recognition. Not one word. Not a sound. Not a hint. And so the human right law works — again, disclaim:

— Societies where human right recognition never is heard of, consequently with no exception reflects hostile and violent communities. No teaching. No education. Box. Dark.

In Sweden, again by DRIFT and not by plan (disabled intellect) to exemplify the nearest familiar, it is the AUTHORITIES — deciding majority — that stand above all. (It has a typical national hierarchy: European Convention Court, Landlord, Public, Police).

— “YOU decide Yourselves how YOU want it where YOU live”, “NI bestämmer själva hur NI vill ha det där NI bor”, when any individual protest is heard. It is sanctioned by Swedish Court. In writ. The “ .. the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world” is literary spitted upon — by the Swedish jurisdictional system. So, from top to toe — again, by DRIFT, not plan (disabled intellect). Not by any deliberate formulated intention. Mentioning the human right recognition part, simply does not connect: no response. Like trying to show pictures to a blind. The authority personnel (social, cultural, authoritative disabled intellect) have no idea of the content and context in UDHR10Dec1948. The bullying follows — from — the authoritative ignorance. Drift. Not plan.

One single example would suffice.

CRIME COMBAT — CRIME PREVENTION. SAFETY PROMOTION. 24/7. Defense. UDHR10Dec1948 — vectorMATH as it is working in human right related daily life: disclaim

NOTE: The general Swedish translated text on English/American movies where the original word MIND appears is, more by rule than exception, translated by the embarrassing Swedish HJÄRNA: brain (the population is undereducated). MATRIX example: “The body cannot live without the mind”. Swedish back-translated: “The body cannot live without the brain”. The dictionary (NORSTEDTS STORA ENGELSK-SVENSKA ORDBOK) true translative foremost Swedish word for MIND is SINNE, apparently not familiar to the translative Swedish populations: all the activities taken together that constitute the alive and aware human being's existence: all senses: our mind (Sw.: sinne, sinnet, sinnesrymden: mind, the mind, the mind space/realm). The body cannot live without all our senses. Swedish translators have horrible other examples, none here mentioned. Only a few has got it. But: No national informative campaign exists to raise the population's basic idea of wit (above the rim of the purling suer). Not one word. Not a hint. Sweden. Bump. Box. Dark.

And violence — intrusion, mind rape — continues to gush out from its (undereducated) nation — as if part of a global charity campaign: the mentality, the attitudes, the inducements: mind, mind rape. Not one word. No education. No teaching. No human right recognition. ”.. all members of the human family .. the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”. Crime combat — crime prevention, security promotion. ”Are you a member?”. Business enterprise — 2018+, every time a store purchase is made, over and over and over again, every time ”Are you a member?” has occupied the national most visited pet vocabulary. The personnel does not understand the priority. Reminding them, is like sticking a high voltage cable into their body. Deep indignation. Taken by the utmost surprise. No education. No teaching. Very friendly (undereducated, intellectually disabled) population. Of course: not everybody. But in general (media): YES. Certainly. Not one word. Not even a hint.

CRIME COMBAT — CRIME PREVENTION. SAFETY PROMOTION. 24/7. Defense. UDHR10Dec1948 — vectorMATH as it is working in human right related daily life: disclaim

Are You a member? The authorities does not understand the concept. Not even close.

The UDHR10Dec1948 is — by the Swedish official translation — apparently treated — and still so interpreted by the authorities — as a RECOMMENDATION (a human made invention with no other connectivity). Not a recognition “of the greatest importance” (UDHR10Dec1948 P7). As what it is — a REMINDER of the innate human NATURE (“the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”) — the Loyal Swedish Authoritative personnel gets angry, upset and responds with hostility and aggressive behavior as if violated in their rights. So (consequential mathematics, COMA): The violent society continues to grow, commanding the populations, withholding them information of their universal human rights. Again: by DRIFT. Not plan. That is how the adult ignorant related stupidity works. No teaching. No education. Obedience and punishment. Good dog.

Swedish second world war national propaganda: “En Svensk Tiger”— A Swede SHUTS (remains silent). Swedish for (»shut the fuck up») is TIG. In present form (TIGA), TIGER ('Nu tiger du!': now you shut the fuck up!, or: ZipIt!) — also iconized with a picture of the animal Tiger (The book, Engl. On Honor and Conscience, Maria-Pia Boëthius HEDER OCH SAMVETE, Norstedts 1991, describing the shameful authoritative and medial Nazi friendly [no public critique allowed] Sweden during WWII). Very sophisticated Swedish authoritative (intellectually disabled) genius. Still going strong. Police, Prosecutor, Court and (”in the interest of the public”) the rest of the loyal solidaric authoritative inhabitants are deeply engaged in, repeatedly, persecuting peaceful humans (INTERPOL COOPERATION TOO) with a guaranteed zero threat picture to other humans and life in general, The public engagemant is aiming, each time, at an imprisonment. Sweden. Obedience and punishment. European Convention. Violence gushes out from it. No teaching. No education. DRIFT. Not plan. Attacking, bullying, compromising on a human with absolutely zero threat to others. Destroying that human beings life.

AS IF OWNER OF THE INTELLECT — WITH RIGHT TO DEROGATE ALL OTHER OPINION: the ideal fascistic attitude

human authoritative consenting rules of thinking — the worst of all the human culture variant species on dictating supremacy

EUROPE 1800+ IN A BOX: Disclaim DEFENSE, EUROPEAN COURT.

— The personnel does not understand the concept. Not even close. Disclaim.

LastRESORT: BeREM

EUROPEAN JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY — what is left of the classic teaching of obedience and punishment ..

THE LAST RESORT OF THE HIGHER POWERS’ REMAINING PAUL-MAN OBEDIENCE (and punish) TEACHINGS?

Comparing Excerpts from The KING JAMES BIBLE The new (and old) testament part

THIS IS NOT ABOUT RELIGION — IT IS ABOUT HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNITION AND A HUMANITY LONGING FOR WORLD PEACE

CRIME COMBAT — CRIME PREVENTION. SAFETY PROMOTION. 24/7. Defense. UDHR10Dec1948 — vectorMATH as it is working in human right related daily life: disclaim

THE PAUL MAN OBEDIENCE (AND PUNISHMENT) TEACHING ORIGIN —

claimed to be the foundation of (Western world 2000y) Christianity:

— not one word Jesus man sayings. Nothing. Not a sound. Not a spell.

Check:

(human ← ”MINISTER OF GOD” ← higher powers ← God: »The Paul-man Cosmological Model»):

HiP:

ROMANS 13:1-4

1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.

2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.

3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:

MinGod0: HiP ¦ LastRESORT ¦ MinGod1

4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil."

".

:

COLOSSIANS 3:18¦20

“

18 Wives, submit yourselves unto your husbands, as it is fit in the Lord.

20 Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord.

”.

This author’s reflexion only on the Paul man’s sayings

By far: history's worst human delusive academic crap

SHOW SUBMISSION TO ANY POWER CAPABLE OF CLAIMING EMPERORSHIP

FEAR ANY POWER CAPABLE OF CLAIMING EMPERORSHIP

”For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil”

a direct exhortation to turn ones back to the inner human nature, recognition of the inherent dignity (P1 UDHR10Dec1948);

a direct exhortation not to care about the just and fair, but to trust that a personal submission under ”the higher powers” is »the will of the divine».

Type slapping a child — or a woman — for disobedience. Very popular Christian adult conduct — apparently also in sexual relations. Very High IQ. MustBuyBook.

— A mentally sick, disoriented, deluded and deeply dissatisfied prick in the history of human civilizations, imagining and preaching having touched the divine. Box. Dark.

— No doubt, it was welcome by the worldly emperors, imagining the advent of a divine sanction to start the slaughter.

— Human history’s worst delusive mental disorientation. Say again. Disclaim. Power. Compare (the law):

• Decision outside human right recognition has only power to destroy. And there are no exceptions. Say again. Disclaim.

CRIME COMBAT — CRIME PREVENTION. SAFETY PROMOTION. 24/7. Defense. UDHR10Dec1948 — vectorMATH as it is working in human right related daily life: disclaim

”For he is the minister of God to thee for good” — apparently a direct fascistic/masochistic inducement idea.

”MINISTER OF GOD”.

Compare the HEGEL (1770-1831) philosophical idea (Source: Bertrand Russel, HISTORY OF WESTERN PHILOSOPHY 1945, Swedish edition 1994, Natur Och Kultur, Sjunde utgåvan, s625ö):

»The German Spirit is the spirit of the new world». Very High IQ. MustBuyBook.

”MINISTER OF GOD”.

— United nations apparently has to wake up, clean the mess, after the apparent idiotic Paul man sayings.

— Sayings that typically has attracted all kinds of the lowest sewer fascistic existences to its divine parade.

that ever has seen a light of letter under the stars. Compare the real steel Jesus man sayings below (the love of natural science).

— A world, taking itself to the Paul man type wordings, will no doubt be a humanity captured in violence, darkness, illusion, constant authority fear, ideas of lust as something sinful instead of something highly educative, favoring a distrustful, ego oriented daily human, full of natural frustration because being denied to explore, discover, experience joy, creating impossible (social-mental) conflicts only generating further conflicts, steadily growing on excessive violence, until the capacitor is full, and the discharge takes over, fast, abrupt and effective.

THE BIBLE, OLD TESTAMENT what we know (the book has been thoroughly read), HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING OF THAT TYPE. AS ALSO IT IS UNDERLINED THE SAME BY THE JESUS MAN SAYINGS (some quoted below). The revelations, whatever these might have been, giving birth to the Paul man sayings truly, as quoted and compared, definitely has nothing of a divine nature in it. It all reflects a submissive fascistic, really low idea of the biblical content and context (of its time). The reader may disclaim, if reasonable arguments are found. Searched for, non yet found. Search continues.

JUST REMINDING BASIC PARTS IN THE OLD TESTAMENT: man and woman are one. ”.. and all of you are children of the most High.”, Ps.82:6. We all have the same innate nature. To justify ”the higher powers” — the Paul man sayings — apparently and provably is to ignore the very essence of the teachings in the old testament, as is also apparently and concordantly vindicated in the Jesus man sayings. Not the Paul man sayings. Other old testament confirmations:

MICAH 6:8

”

He hath shewed thee O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?

”.

Apparently by experience — whether we know of the script or its context directly by heart: The more we realize of the just and fair, the happier we become. Compare:

ISIAIAH 51:12

”

12 I, even, I am he that comforteth you:

who art thou, that thou shouldest be afraid of a man that shall die, and of the son of man which shall be made as grass;

”.

(So, finally) Compare The JESUS MAN SAYINGS with the above Paul man sayings:

MATTHEW.4:10

"

10 Then saith Jesus unto him,

Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.

".

SO, European Convention and its state jurisdictional and psychological aces: WHERE IS THE CORRESPONDING LAWFUL JUST AND FAIR, decent and preferable conduct REPRESENTED IN EUROPEAN CONVENTION AND JURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE AND PROTOCOLS?

John.14:30

“

30 Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.

”.

This author’s reflexion only on the Jesus man’s sayings

(Exactly the point. But how many [Christians] have understood any of its meaning, the time of history we live in, its details and its streamings?).

And (So:) when it comes to Christianity in general (»Christianity’s worst nightmare»): What is this — you tell me:

John.16:9

”

.. because they believe not on me;

”.

(It would be a sensation if they did, the above said).

Christians: Followers of Christ. Seldom (or never) a heard recitation. Always citing the Paul man.

MATTHEW 23:10

”

.. for one is your Master, even Christ.

”.

(Christianity is [apparently] worse than a mess: has ”.. nothing in me”).

Disclaim.

Apparently: nowhere.

Apparently: nothing.

As already testified.

2000 year history.

Conclusion:

So: what, exactly, does the European Court stand for — except an age old classic traditional convenient fascistic and satanistic dictatorship — on DRIFT. Not plan. No deliberate conspiracy. Just the consequence of turning ones back to a recognition of the human birth inherent dignity: unable to see a universal human rights recognition. Intellectually disabled community. Disclaim.

A V8 on 5.

CRIME COMBAT — CRIME PREVENTION. SAFETY PROMOTION. 24/7. Defense. UDHR10Dec1948 — vectorMATH as it is working in human right related daily life: disclaim

Strange as it seems: The working group behind UDHR10Dec1948 — these days Dec2023 — seem to have be visitors from a more educated planet Earth in another Solar System than ours. It does not add up: nobody cares. Present day personnel apparently does not understand the concept — instead blinded by majority decision power mandates, which have nothing at all to do with a universal human right recognition: ”teaching and education”, ”constantly in mind” — where?

Consequential mathematics (COMA).

Natural sciences.

MinGod1: MinGod0

“MINISTER OF GOD” PART 1

y50: MinGod1

“MINISTER OF GOD” status as “the higher powers ordained by God” is given to rulers and emperors of the world.

(Source: The Paul man sayings — held as a saint, also the [foremost] founder of the so called Christian church: — he refers parts in the old testament script, along with the term Christ, and the status “MINISTER OF GOD”, justifying an apostle [under Christ]).

THE PAUL MAN preaches persistently the rulers and emperors to be “for they/he are the ministers of God”. The ruled is exhorted by the Paul man sayings to show submission and not to protest, 'unless the wrath of God come upon him'. The following (y1000-1200) “MINISTER OF GOD” Crusades justifies the Slaughter Era (in God's name). It pictures the advent of a free (The Paul man sayings) 'God sanctioned' World Violence and emperor “MINISTER OF GOD” ruling (western world) authority.

y1800 (Except England): y50

Europe National Jurisdictions:

Populations under our authority are hereby declared National Property.

That was the hammer drop.

Disobedience will be punished. (We justify “MINISTER OF GOD”, now in a more high meaning [The German Spirit, Hegel philosophy]).

The populations shall sacrifice their blood to secure the survival of this “MINISTER OF GOD” national “higher powers” jurisdictional system. (European Jurisdictional Convention, after 1948, was created as a disclaiming response to the universal declaration and its independence of nation and status and its definite deconsecration of “higher powers” and “MINISTER OF GOD”).

(Half the world accepts it — and then again rejects it by disclaimers under different costumes, as do the European Convention).

Disobedience — REFUSAL TO COOPERATE — will be punished.

No critique is allowed. It will not be recognized. It will not be accepted. It will not be heard.

NO CRITICS TO THE EUROPEAN JURISDICTIONAL SYSTEMS ARE ALLOWED

Europe’s abolition of Defense — proving continued European Jurisdictional Fascism: obedience and punishment, no universal human right recognition acceptance

All — any — oppositions between one single violent refusing individual and any local or regional or national society public, will not be taken up by any jurisdictional instance by any other way than as so decided and resolved and settled from square one: excluded from society. No right. No recognition. No acceptance: Remove that individual out of society. European Court Authorization. As Documented and Testified. Expedited European Fascism. Say: no universal single human right recognition. Only one example needed. 1. Sweden. 1997. ”You drive with that fucking human value!”. Say again.

— ”Ceases not these writings from you immediately .. your tenancy right will be abolished.”. European society cannot handle a civilized jurisdiction. No way. Not even close.

And so it has continued, still, up to this writing day.

A fascistic, satanistic, dictating world ruling emperorship.

Pretending to be the human beings best pal.

No critique is allowed. It will not be recognized. It will not be accepted. It will not be heard.

Violence is gushing out FROM it.

Disclaim.

A5 UDHR10Dec1948:

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

As the European Jurisdictional Convention rejects universal human right recognition, it does neither have to bother on caring for the understanding of basic moral conduct and behavior: The inability to react by indignation in witnessing an open rape. Violence is gushing right out from it. Low educated. Intellectually disabled. ”MINISTER OF GOD”. Europe (50+)¦2023+.

— To these jurisdictional aces, every NOT exposing slaughter with a physical ax is nonsense. Disclaim; They don’t understand, do not respect, the concept of human right recognition. No way. And consequently not the concept of its violation. Disclaim.

Authorities, police, prosecutor, court, public attacks — and persecutes (INTERPOL COOPERATION) — single individual violent refusing persons, forcing on them suffering, mobbing, general mistreat, bullying, and repeated imprisonment, practically destroying the person's life. The victim's pain and suffering is met so: You have yourself to blame. One has to take the consequences of ones one actions. Mobbing. Exactly. Every single detail.

The victim has made no action at all. The victim represents a zero threat picture. The victim has just refused to cooperate with authorities representing violence and disrespect for a human rights recognition.

(See details in DEFENSE: it is not the military system as such; it is the [police, prosecutor, court] European Jurisdictional System, treating the population as personal belongings and property, dictating obedience under threat of punishment: a direct violation of human rights recognition — fundamental defense integration — and its universally declared content and context. The European Jurisdictional Convention Personnel definitely does not understand the concept. Not even close. Disabled intellect: low educated).

The authorities (European Jurisdiction Convention — backed up by a threatened and horrified for punishment loyal and solidaric public mob, jurisdictionally addressed ”in the public interest”) claim a “MINISTER OF GOD” status in justifying the attacks and mistreat, so back-stabbing the victim on its suffering, accusing the victim for unjust conduct and inadequate moral behavior: »this is the justfull wrath of God you are experiencing, for being disobedient to us ”MINISTERS OF GOD”».

— So you keep saying. Why not shoot me in the head directly, you shy?

It is the face of the provably most evil, intellectually disabled and persistently deconsecrated human cultural inducement ever having experienced a walk in a pair of shoes on Earth. A stupid, uneducated, low, not even close to the already unborn.

Even if there are sympathetic persons, well aware of the deeply unfair and unjust treatment, they realize, frightened, astonished an paralyzed, also themselves to become victims, if openly taking a stand.

The whole society acts (realizes) the same situation where three or four children is mocking a single child, making it cry, just by exposing their evil to it: the evil mental kick of power, the idea of mental control. The idea of mind control. Evil authority.

Not one word human right recognition. Not even a hint.

No critique is allowed. It will not be recognized. It will not be accepted. It will not be heard.

It is a scenery of a hopelessly lost society, practicing its insane horror of jurisdiction and violence, steadily growing and expanding with accelerating insecure daily life for all. The responsible authorities' personnel do not understand what they are involved in.

MinGod2: MinGod1

“MINISTER OF GOD” PART 2

Slavery? Europe? Gimme a break .. what?

Explain:

Disclaim this:

Forcing the population to cooperate in performing a servitude

to show, forced to practice, an obedience to a (1800+) self proclaimed jurisdictional national authority

under direct threat of punishment

in order to secure

the future survival of

that jurisdictional authority

“MINISTER OF GOD”

by the sacrifice of the populations' blood

under a perpetually continued threat of punishment for disobedience ..

Disobedience — REFUSAL TO COOPERATE — will be punished.

No critique is allowed. It will not be recognized. It will not be accepted. It will not be heard.

That would be a clear definition of slavery.

Not to say a tyrannic slavery,

an evil, beyond any other, zero caring attitude, perpetually holding itself as the highest.

Box. Dark.

A5 UDHR10Dec1948:

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Of the worst kind too: repeated persecution of peaceful humans, forcing them to run the institutional gauntlet in order to ask the supreme authorities for special permissions to exist. A humiliation without parallels: The gauntlet is already so classified and set up by the European Jurisdictional Authoritative Convention: Show us a paper that the applicant is an idiot, a lower standing human. Otherwise: obey — or go to jail. Very friendly population. Not aggressive or violent at all. Extremely tolerant. Well educated.

— These aces also hold their attitude to be of a very anxious societal nature in human care: first kill. Then ask if it hurts. They really have got the hang of it — As they anyway have their traditional titles secured: “MINISTER OF GOD”.

Good education. Not at all intellectually disabled. Mathematics. Physics. Chemistry. Cosmological details. Earth history. Specialists in atomic nuclear physics (Hiroshima and Nagasaki). Very High IQ. Planet's biology more or less thoroughly killed after 200 years of educated academia (1800+) (According to Swedish media, the reason is Invasion of Insects]). MustBuyBook. Very HiIQ.

Obedience and punishment. Good dog.

European Jurisdictional Convention authorities has also (the actual convention, its pin point) agreed and consented that THAT type of slavery servitude must not be interpreted as any a derogative or humiliating servitude, and not (so — a consented European) human rights violation.

BECAUSE APPARENTLY THESE EUROPEAN JURISDICTIONAL CONVENTION ACES STILL THINK AND BELIEVE THAT

• INTELLIGENCE IS THEIR EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY.

• UDHR10Dec1948 IS A HUMAN CREATION.

• UDHR10Dec1948 IS NOT A COLLECTED UNIVERSAL INTELLIGIBLE NATURAL REACTION

(“.. and all of you are children of the most High” —

a human creation according to the intellectual level of European Jurisdictional Convention)

AGAINST — and an explicit banning of — AN EXPOSED “MINISTER OF GOD” EXECUTED UNPRECEDENTED HUMAN CRUELTY.

• UDHR10Dec1948 IS NOT AN AWAKENING TO A NEW WORLD SITUATION OF REALIZATION,

“.. the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world ..”

EXPRESSING A NEVER BEFORE REVEALED CONSEQUENTIAL INSIGHT wisdom into THE INNATE HUMAN NATURE.

• UDHR10Dec1948 IS NOT THE VERY MUCH CLOSE TO THE TRUTH ON THE ART OF MANAGING A TRUE CIVILIZATION BASED ON THE ONLY AVAILABLE EXISTING UNIVERSAL NATURAL PROVISION:

human right recognition as the only existing knowledge domain:

— gravitation, electricity — heat, light, magnetism: life.

All the natural sciences. All the mathematics.

No exceptions.

Disclaim — as upsetting as it is:

These European Jurisdictional Convention aces are those who foremost should be positioned behind bars — safely distanced from the public. Not positioned in state administrative work at all: the least of all the human mind educated. Not one word human right recognition. Not even a hint:

— »We decide what shall be decided, as we anyway are the only existing “MINISTER OF GOD” decisive jurisdictional deciding authority instance».

— »We decide to decide for your decision».

— »We decide that it is we that decide».

— »We decide the decisions».

— »We decide decision».

“MINISTER OF GOD”.

And that is the UDHR10Dec1948 A30 violation.

No use of Humanity for profiting, controlling or manipulative purpose is allowed. Not by birth. Not by nation. Not by status. Not by body. Not by mind. Not at all. Not by Microsoft. Not by Google. Not by any kind sort, type or nature of Market or Copyright or Claim. No way.

”slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms”.

These European Jurisdictional Convention provably the human history’s most low educated, even more apparently and provably less intellectually developed aces down to their last atom do not understand the concept:

— CHILDREN (even Animals) handles the complex with utmost excellence.

— There is nothing wrong with the intellect as such. No way.

The problem is lying on the inducement plane of showing some (minimum god damned) interest of its content.

A5 UDHR10Dec1948:

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

No way. Not even close. Trying to communicate these universal basic to one of the named, is as successful as trying to show pictures to a blind. No response.

Only an intellectually undeveloped mind (destructed childhood) — perfectly blind to human right recognition — can be equally receptive. It reflects an established administration managed by perfectly morally insane attitudes:

Disobedience — REFUSAL TO COOPERATE — will be punished.

No critique is allowed. It will not be recognized. It will not be accepted. It will not be heard.

Disclaim.

No one has a right to expose or force humanity into servitude of any kind, sort or nature. Not even close to. Not in the family. Not among friends. Not among foreigners. Not on any land. Not at all in our universe. And that is exactly what the European Jurisdictional Convention aces did, do, claim, and perform: a screaming violation of universal human rights recognition.

And when it comes to DEFENSE, again — the aim is to make it stronger, not weaker:

Nationally consecrated European Jurisdictional Convention apparently and provably have no idea of what Defense is all about. Not even close: attacking what it should protect; blocking what it should promote: no education. No teaching. Obedience and punishment. And the instance is blocking the populations from discovering that, too, because of its cheer for its own idea of representing the highest intellect: “MINISTER OF GOD”. Not one word. A clear cut historically (1800+) regionally nationally self proclaimed, fascistic, satanistic and dictating authoritative European Jurisdictional Convention, still holding itself as a righteous and honorable “MINISTER OF GOD”.

It has no word of intellectual fathoming. It uses humanity for dictating and obedience purposes — slavery servitude — to decide over decision, to destroy — equal rights — the very foundation of human right recognition. Again: by Drift. Not plan: Intellectually disabled.

It cannot relate the human intellect, no way, it cannot detail a human right recognizing reasoning, not at all the human right knowledge domain. It does not understand native girl wit, the indestructible child mind, the general life respect. No way. It has only power to destroy, break, kill, punish. Obedience and punishment. It persistently is claiming itself a jurisdictional supremacy over a universal human rights recognition.

And that is a violation of universal human rights.

THE universal EQUAL RIGHTS ARE GUARANTEED INDEPENDENT OF, AND NEVER POWERED BY, DECISIONS, HUMAN AUTHORITY, REGION, NATION, BIRTH OR STATUS. Independent. Universal. “.. the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world ..”.

There never was a “MINISTER OF GOD”. Nothing BETWEEN the individual and Nature (Life). No blocking or derogating or separating instance or authority. Any claim intended to undo that equal rights foundation apparently defines exercising fascism, the worst of the worst. NOT freedom, NOT justice and NOT peace in the world. Again: INTERPOL COOPERATION, European police, persecutes violence refusers, securing these to be brought in front of the European Jurisdictional Courts, sentenced and imprisoned. Repeatedly.

Forced to answer in front the humanity's most low educated, most apparent historically intellectually underdeveloped: European Jurisdictional Convention. History’s worst intellectual bald cut. Media continues to practice self cleaning on the subject: not one word. No protests. Silently loyal and solidaric with the persecuting instances.

European Convention, its Courts, jurisdictional institutions, others and their and governments:

— You mean to exhort the populations to vote on that too?

— »Everybody for freedom .. raise a hand .. ?».

History’s worst intellectual bald cut.

This is what is going to happen — disclaim:

— Decisions outside human right recognition have only power to (further) destroy.

And because the human right recognition complex is an affair between each individual and nature

(gravitation and electricity — light, heat, magnetism: life, the human right knowledge domain)

— where children (and even Animals) already handle the processes excellently and gallantly

— majority decisions have no mandate.

Dodge that one, anyone who can.

THERE IS NO BIBLICAL GEOGRAPHICAL OR SPIRITUAL OR SACRED EXPLICIT OR SPECIFIC DIVINE PHYSICAL GROUND.

EARTH IS THE HOME OF THE HUMAN FAMILY. AND ALL OF THEM ARE BORN FREE AND EQUAL IN DIGNITY AND RIGHTS.

THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE — OTHER THAN CLAIMED BY SATANISTIC, FASCISTIC AND DICTATING FUCK UPS.

UNLESS SUCH INDUCEMENTS AND ATTITUDES ARE EXPELLED OUT, VIOLENCE WILL NEVER STOP EXPANDING.

SumEJC: MinGod2

SUMMING THE EUROPEAN JURISDICTIONAL CONVENTION

Summing the European Jurisdictional Convention “MINISTER OF GOD” administrations — disclaim:

JUST REFER ONE SINGLE (EUROPEAN COURT) FILE NUMBER THAT DOES NOT VERIFY, ONLY ONE WILL SUFFICE, ANY:

By explicit formulation in specific paragraphs

(as a respond to, shortly after the universal

independent of nation, birth “higher powers” and “MINISTER OF GOD”

local and regional jurisdictional conventions and association authorities,

UDHR10Dec1948)

a European Jurisdictional Convention (EUROPEAN CONVENTION) was created and consented by (1800+) local and regional authorities (traditionally and divinely knighted as “MINISTERS OF GOD” from the Paul man sayings, Christianity history)

to secure their continuing local and regional “MINISTER OF GOD” authority by stating on the credit of the consented European Convention

that no single individual

violence refusing person

— the here related human right recognizing and its provably vindicated Foundation of Defense, now explicitly banned in European Convention: SUPPORTED AND PROMOTED VIOLENCE REFUSAL, refusal to cooperate with movements ignoring universal human rights recognition, THE UNIVERSAL FOUNDATION OF DEFENSE independent of birth, nation or other differences human to human —

never, ever

would find even one single IMPARTIAL AND COMPETENT national court,

no European jurisdictional instance whatsoever,

absolutely not,

accepting to deal with a case of conflict

between the UDHR10Dec1948 recognizing and violence refusing person

and the local and national public and its authorities, their bullying, discrimination, harassments, general mistreat and nationally authorized repeated imprisonments. That whatever the case would be NEVER EVER GIVING THE SLIGHTEST OPPORTUNITY FOR THE INDIVIDUALLY VIOLENCE REFUSING UDHR10Dec1948 acknowledged PERSON

TO RECEIVE RIGHT AGAINST THE OFFENDERS.

A8 UDHR10Dec1948:

Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution of the law.

— There is no ”fundamental” UNIVERSAL HUMAN ”rights granted him by the” EUROPEAN JURISDICTIONAL CONVENTION ”constitution of the law”. Nothing such exists.

— The instance can freely and does so also arbitrarily interfere (interference with privacy [A29.1]) with universal human rights recognition, demanding obedient servitude under threat of lawful punishment. No such jurisdictional or other enterprise is allowed. And that is a violation of universal human rights recognition.

— There is no ”effective” in European Jurisdictional Convention (EJC) — other than »Kill UDHR10Dec1948».

— There is no ”remedy” at all in EJC. Its practicing idea of jurisdiction itself is provably a school example of fascistic oppression from a ”MINISTER OF GOD” unto a lower treated.

A12 UDHR10Dec1948:

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

— There is no ”protection of the law” — no recognized ”foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”: universal human rights recognition — inside the European Jurisdictional Convention. The instance arbitrarily generates internal associative consenting authorizations aiming at preserving its continuing dictating unconditional regional and national commanding servitude among the populations, to secure its continuing own dictating jurisdictional authority on the population’s credit. The instance does not recognize the universally declared human rights UDHR10Dec1948, but violates these in claiming special nationally authorized European Human Rights — as if having, and treating, the populations as a jurisdictional private property. More directly so: The European Jurisdictional Convention violates, blocks and degrades the foundation of DEFENSE: violence refusal. The administrative personnel does apparently 1. not understand the concept, 2. not understand the cultural and universal perspective in what it is involved in: the individual human.

A10 UDHR10Dec1948:

Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

— The ”a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal” does not exist inside the European Jurisdictional Convention: it does not recognize the universal human right recognition declaration: independent equal rights independent of birth, nation and status. The instance rejects such completely, and is entirely based on disregarding the meaning of ”universal”. Thereof the term ”European”. By the standards of UDHR10Dec1948 — independent of birth, nation and status — the European Jurisdictional Convention is illegal, a violation of and attack upon (removing) human right recognition. If its personnel would recognize UDHR10Dec1948, the EJC would not exist. And the ”independent and impartial” would be granted, certified and guaranteed. Now, it has absolutely no representation in Europe. It plainly does not exist.

EVER. NO WAY. NOT BY ANY MEANS, WHATSOEVER.

Because that would BURY — terminate — the named convention in its own historical blood. It would disclaim the Convention on its present own provable highly beloved satanistic and fascistic exercising “MINISTER OF GOD” inducements, that which is generating the present sewer pool of provably human history's most morally low educated European Jurisdictionally Exercising Aces, honored only by the love of their own legend. BECAUSE THERE IS NO OTHER AVAILABLE EXPLANATION TO SUCH A PERSISTENT LOVE FOR THE LOWEST OF THE LOW: — its cheer for mandatory power and its associated violence, and provably spitting contempt for the universal meaning in and of UDHR10Dec1948.

————

Shorter: Justice made impossible — it comes available only in Impossible;

European Jurisdictional Convention: an advocationally down to the last atom BY DRIFT, NOT PLAN — deeply intellectually disabled society, not at all aware what it is involved in, blinded by its own greed for power — provable “MINISTER OF GOD” Organized Satanistic Fascistic — Fundamentally Denying UDHR10Dec1948 — Dictating Anarchy, reigned by the lowest possible intellectually equipped human beings ever having seen the light of a star. An instance from where violence and attacks on the human rights most versatile foundations is gushing — holding, claiming and pretending itself to be the human individual's best pal. Disclaim.

————

Relate it. Break it down. Expose the details. Teaching and education.

FOR EVERY DETAILED QUESTIONING, THE JURISDICTIONAL EUROPEAN ACES BREAKS THE OPPONENT DOWN, BY REFERRING A DICTATING “MINISTER OF GOD” LECTURING ATTITUDE NAMED LAW AND ORDER DOWN THE THROAT OF THE OPPONENT, SUFFOCATING HIS ARGUING TO BE AN ATTACK UPON DIVINE MORALITY. THE ENTERPRISE GOES ON SAFELY PROTECTED BY THE HIGH WALLS OF LIE, SO LONG HAVING BEEN HONORED AND WORSHIPED.

STUDY THESE provably deeply intellectually disabled “MINISTER OF GOD” POOL CREEPING EUROPEAN JURISDICTIONAL ACES ON THEIR PROVABLY HONOR-LESS, MENTALLY AND MORALLY SICK, FUCKED UP SLICK ATTITUDES AND INDUCEMENTS, SO PROUD OVER THEIR ACADEMIC ABILITY TO KILL HUMAN RIGHT JUSTICE, PROVING THEIR CAPABLE LEVEL IN A DAILY EXERCISE OF REALIZING AN EXPLICIT MORAL JURISDICTIONAL EXTINCTION: NEVER EVER GIVE A VIOLENCE REFUSING INDIVIDUAL RIGHT— AGAINST HIS ATTACKING ENVIRONMENT. European Jurisdictional Convention.

-------------

Compare UDHR10Dec1948 — universally independent of birth, nation and status — with European Convention ”MINISTER OF GOD”

——————————————

UDHR10Dec1948:

Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. SOURCE: A3.

European Convention (created soon after 1948 — stressing continued “MINISTER OF GOD” authority –1800+):

One shall obey, serve and respect the local, regional and national authorities. Universal human rights are neither accepted nor respected. Disobedience shall be punished. SOURCE: documented history;

Disobedience — REFUSAL TO COOPERATE — will be punished.

No critique is allowed. It will not be recognized. It will not be accepted. It will not be heard.

It will not be discussed.

It is a hammer of iron laid on every human beings neck, 100% inviolable — until revealed, related and explained exactly down to the last atom for what — exactly — it is. Its authority cannot be defeated by any physical weapon, only by true knowledge.

ExSW: LastRES

HOW SWEDISH AUTHORITIES PROMOTE A CONTINUED GROWTH OF VIOLENCE, CRIMINALITY AND STATE OF GENERAL INSECURE daily LIVING: not one word human right recognition.

AS IF STILL OWNER OF THE INTELLECT — WITH RIGHT TO DEROGATE ALL OTHER OPINION: the ideal fascistic attitude

human authoritative consenting rules of thinking — the worst of all the human culture variant species on dictating supremacy

EUROPE 1800+ IN A BOX: Disclaim DEFENSE, EUROPEAN COURT.

— The personnel does not understand the concept. Not even close. Disclaim:

EUROPEAN JURISDICTIONAL CONVENTION VIOLATES UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS

LAWS ABOUT SEXUAL INTERCOURSE

See also in LawConduct — The New 1999 Fraudulent Swedish Bible:

comparing cross referring concordant quotes from King James Bible and the older Swedish Bible 1917,

versus the Swedish 1999 New Bible: ”Laws about sexual intercourse”:

Short:

The Bible — Old testament — has nothing of the kind. Not one word. Not one atom. Not even close. The use of the terms Mother, Father, Daughter, Son .. is aphoristic. Not corporeal.

First proof: The Jerusalem example: cities certainly have no father or mother.

It is about attitude, inducement, mentality (mind), the way of the heart ..

——————————————————————

causality .. how thinking is composed .. detailed .. analysis .. results ..

.. penetration .. and association .. details .. in explicit .. mind origin ..

——————————————————————

— While The Book (in explicit the old testament) explains HOW KNOWLEDGE WORKS, the Swedish Parliament (that decided a new translation) and the Swedish church (and the rest of the Christian populations) interpret the Aphoristic Knowledge Teaching as a geographical and physical chronicle: »what can be touched, and not». Obedience and punishment. It is as bad as it has come. 1999.

Article examples are exposed in detail

— Explicit knowledge-relating and explaining examples are illuminated to underline »the new Swedish absurdity» (A REGULAR fraud — by drift, not plan): We witness, no doubt, relate and explain a biblically ”MINISTER OF GOD” deluded provable Swedish intellectually disabled SUCH society — 100%, further sinking down in its own consequentially (drift, not plan) created human rights violations. Spanking — obedience and punishment, national state authority — continues, spreading wider. Very Hollywood popular among the leading aces of their kind (»join our new world wide family in successfully killing tenderness and a final termination of the still unknown prolonged unbelievable erotic ecstasy» — next generation of elongated Bugs: they start eating up the front door, then tearing the entire house .. suggesting a further charming Friday with the remainings of the family ..).

It is a (world) hammer knock on the roof of a clear cut screamingly degenerated Swedish authoritative morality. It chains its inhabitants to fear and delusion — further increasing violence and frustration: no education. No teaching. Obedience and punishment. The worst of all the human cultures. Disclaim. Detailed, to the last atom. Not one word. Not even a hint. Not a sound.

Compare JEREMIAH 50:24

”

24 I have laid a snare for thee, and thou art also taken, O Babylon, and thou wast not aware: thou art found, and also caught, because thou hast striven against the LORD.

”.

Definitely NOT revealed by a Satanist’s cogitative mind (TheCLAIM). Only preserved — safely — by the word.

Disclaim.

The corresponding Swedish Bible 1917 text is more explaining (not translated here)

(»the only true Swedish version», a good complement to King James Bible 1600+).

Jer.50:23-24:

”

23. Huru sönderbruten och krossad är den icke, den hammare som slog hela jorden! Huru har icke Babel blivit till häpnad bland folken!

24. Jag lade ut en snara för dig, och så blev du fångad, Babel, förrän du visste därav; du blev ertappad och gripen, ty det var med HERREN som du hade givit dig i strid.

”.

It is not never was about religion. It is about knowledge.

Sweden (the most loud and seen of the population): A reign of a long termed developed authoritative mind terror. Obedience, submissiveness and punishment (European ten second history). An oppressed population, fostered by a ”MINISTER OF GOD” authority to a solidaric and loyal respectful authoritative obedient and fearful individual, publicly performing its beloved harassing violence against violence refusers (media storms). It is the cultural practice of the art of mobbing the young child to silent obedience, oppression. Modern Swedish case history. Not a word. And you come here and talk about .. what? Maybe the world’s most segregated society. Maybe.

EXAMPLE: Taking in refugees from Ukraine is OK. Absolutely. Not telling them on what type of tourist bus they have been seated, is a completely different side of the story (Maybe they should have stayed home .. Maybe). Not one word human right recognition. Violence refusers are imprisoned, bullied, harassed, discriminated, cruelly humiliated, repeatedly. That is not a country I would have fled to. That is a country I would have fled from. Loyal media.

Disclaim.

Disobedience — REFUSAL TO COOPERATE — will be punished. HumanRightRecognitionDenial.

No critique is allowed. It will not be recognized. It will not be accepted. It will not be heard.

Disclaim.

HOW SWEDISH AUTHORITIES BLOCK EDUCATION

The population receives neither responsibility education, nor basic force handling teaching (traffic conditions, how to handle a car: no national campaigns)

No Media Content. No Recurring Advertising. No Interest. Nature is killed.

EXAMPLE: SWEDISH STATE ADMINISTRATIONS AND JURISDICTIONAL SYSTEM — they cannot handle civilization:

— The state personnel does not communicate with the population on responsibility and judgment. Not one word. Not a hint. Zero response.

— 1. Instead of ”teaching and education” the state personnel builds physical Road Bumps

— treating the population’s individuals as non communicative intellectually disabled tagged cattle, also now supervised (personal slots).

— 2. Instead of ”teaching and education” the state personnel builds and mounts up Speed Cameras — treating the population’s individuals as non communicative intellectually disabled tagged cattle, again.

RESOLUTION:

• no moral

• no education

• no teaching

• no IDEA OF responsibility

• no IDEA Of judgment

IF FIXED — with the present pace of Swedish jurisdiction: approximately maybe year 250 000:

— » If I had HAD even the smallest IDEA of care, responsibility and basic judgment teaching, I would NEVER EVER have gotten myself into THAT situation which LED to that horrible accident». Ever. I WOULD HAVE LEFT MY CAR IN THE GARAGE. Absolutely.

SWEDEN: no teaching. No education. Bump. Box. Dark.

— In the kitchen. On the industry floor. In traffic. Accidents always without exception happens from the fraction of the second when a 100% FOCUS is lost.

— Testimony from a person who witnessed in detail how a life was ended in a traffic situation, how it evolved from start. No Education.

There are several (many) movies illustrating the Act of The Principle: the driver seems not aware of that the car is Moving while engaged in Something Else Than Driving. And above all: does not seem to realize the gravity of the situation: to Be a Driver of a Car, what it entails, and what forces are under play. Teaching and Education. National Campaigns. 24/7. Instead of sorting low responsibility and poor knowledge attitudes out from Traffic and other situations by teaching and education, raising the populations idea of wit, present car industry and state authorities promote an incorporation of further tagged cattle manipulating authorization: MeMachineDrivesAndPromptsYouHuman.

— Disabled Intelligence Expands. No human right recognition. The Rise of The Machines — over Humanity.

— Sweden: Not one word. Courts: ”That is not our responsibility”. Violence gushes out from it. By DRIFT, not plan. By NOT caring. No teaching. No education.

Obedience and punishment.

Low educated.

Intellectually less developed: Police. Prosecutor. Court.

Obedience and punishment.

Status of the world 2023.

universe history details

OUR EARTH — AND HOW IT IS handled and understood BY THE AUTHORITIES

The main subject in this presentation:

The fusion limit mass presentation begins here from

FUSION LIMIT MASS

(FULIMA) — modern academic scientific community on nuclear physics mathematics and experimentation: teaching and education

GUARD ¦ TheAtomicNucleus4

FuLiMa: Original Apr2004 [Gränsmassan.wps], clarified Dec2023

INTRODUCTION ¦ BASICS ¦ FULIMAdefinition

Background —

DEDUCING THE UNIVERSAL FUSION LIMIT MASS:

THE FIRST EVALUATION (2004 — Earth’s 5 Equations) did not have the present insight of the (Jun2023) conclusive DeducingTHErZ result, here further explained in rZresolution2023. In this presentation (Dec2023) the 2004 evaluation is revisited — again confirmed — and it is explicitly represented by CASE1 in TwoCASES.

It so happened (2004) — using the library schoolbook approximated natural constants — that the e reducing ne-facor 5 was selected for a nominal test. The fusion limit mass (FULIMA) value on those conditions gave the value 6.80016 T24 KG. And we will continue referring that value as the nominal one. See specific diagrams and tables in FULIMAr0.

The point to show and clarify, is that the rZ result has the CASE2 significance — exposing the exact same provisional nuclear spin toroid morphological mathematics as the original CASE1. However, as the validity of the rZ CASE2 has pointed out, the CASE1 (modern academic idea of a uniformly distributed nuclear surface charge) has no physical representation (the Angeli2004 world collected data proofs).

See further details with links in the rZresolution2023 .

The DeducingTHErZ result (Jun2023 from ReHofstadetr1956 ¦ rZresolution2023)

has improved the original TNED deduction from Apr2004 in UH

(UniverseHistory — @Internet Aug2008: »the final countdown» — resonant solutions)

This Dec2023 presentation accounts for the details.

Related physics and mathematics

Our Earth property in the universe — how (and why ..)

PO4 ¦ EarthMASS ¦ MainPurpose ¦ TheFULIMAÑresolution ¦ m0JSUBequilibrium — the FULIMA Universal Fusion Limit Mass complex mathematics

our EARTH property in the universe — and how it is taken care of by the lawful abiding authorities

Consequential mathematics (COMA)

FUSION LIMIT MASS (FULIMA)

TOP SURFACE PRESSURE 2 Dmax

CONCENTRIC ATOMIC PRODUCTION versus the modern academia 1800+ suggested ”water from the outer” COLLISION PLANETESIMAL CONSTRUCT:

THE METEORITE PROOFS APPARENTLY WILL FAVOR ONLY ONE OF THESE IN A GENERAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE principal BODY BUILDING

——————————————

Dmax — deduction¦ Dmax — context ¦ StandardUniversal — short explanation on Light’s Gravitational Dependency and the universal constant of divergence c0 = 2.99792458 T8 M/S

The fusion limit mass primary J-body surface nuclear balancing conditions will be the best physically/chemically suited widest possible time window for primary chemical synchronization to develop the entire chart of atoms from the Dmax neutron mass body through direct exothermal fusions. And (therefore) the most suited for developing biological life (see further details in CWONfromCAP — complete whole number solution of Earth crust isotopic compositions through concentric atomic production, concordant data collected from three independent 1900:s established encyclopedia on a error margin difference by max ±1%).

Modern academy with its ”water came from the outer” has always (1800+) had a the strangest attitude towards Natural Science:

— Invention. Not deduction: »the conditions were better year 1311».

If the reader can disclaim that on a related arguing basis, we can all go home. Thank you very much.

” Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.”, Full: GUARD .. ¦ RespondingNATURE ¦ TreeDEATH — 2015-2020 ¦ TRWDS

— How come modern academia — education: »kill the hill bill» — does not understand the aim of natural scientific existence? What’sUp? Why is its intelligence clearly disabled?

— Why is the world state administration academia and its personnel clearly disabled from a natural scientific love of life?

— Where is the spontaneous ability to experience a sorely deep indignant upsetness in witnessing an ongoing rape? The Yearn to scream it to the Moon? Where? I don’t see any.

— This is our home in the universe. And healthy humans don’t do this. Something has gotten really, badly, wrong.

CRIME COMBAT. CRIME PREVENTION. SAFETY PROMOTION. 24/7. Defense. Never sleep. Always awake. All branches. Entire Society. Education Explicit UDHR10Dec1948:

Real world conditions 2023: — It pictures a veritable RAPE. Not one word human right recognition. Always Other.

Estimated local forest recovery [SIMARD2012] time: at least 400y — fully 1200y, fully restored biodiversity. All traces of the violation removed. Say again. The love of our home. Respect.

WHERE IS WORLD JURISDICTION, CONDEMNING THIS TYPE OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR?

WHERE IS WORLD INTELLECTUAL ADULTERY REALIZING THE PROFOUND MADNESS?

WHERE IS THE GENERAL ACADEMIC EDUCATIONAL TEACHING ON LIFE PROVISION?

Denial — from square one.

— »Mathematics is a creation of the human intellect», as quoted.

Intellectual disability.

cannot adapt civilization to natural requirements: State administrations cannot handle Civilization.

PURPOSEFUL SHARING OF RESOURCES — EARTH BIOLOGY. Trade. Market. Business.

— PERIODIC SYSTEM is one of the proofs HELD FORTH BY NATURE — certifying a direct intellectual disability inside modern academia: the academic cheer for claiming itself the origin of mathematics. Meaning: disabled intelligence. Shorter: MAC reflects disabled intelligence. Disclaim. Please.

— But the academic personnel has gotten so far astray, they do not understand the concept of related.

All nature production: The Atomic Universe.

AllKeplerMath is the general cosmological and comprehensive comparing proof in more detail.

The fusion limit mass complex

An overview of the results in this presentation is given in RESULTS, linking to the different sections. The following context presentation gives extensive links to further detailed parts in this Universe History documentation connecting the sections, unless already familiar.

Nearest below in m0JSUBequilibrium, we begin with relating the physical and mathematical basics in defining the universal object for a type fusion limit mass (FULIMA).

— We should note (again) that nothing in this presentation has a modern academia connection, not to any branch in any part of the modern academic teaching system, as experienced. Not even close. Compare: Full. Still not none word.

Signs of recovery and good hope for developing a general natural civilized conduct.

There are in related physics and mathematics a number of foremost three explaining Earth Equations having eluded the 1800+ modern academia acuity. Namely in due to its cheer for inventions and consensus — instead of deductions and interest in natural investigation: The relatable existent natural intelligible. And, consequently collecting the rest of humanity with its genius into its cosmological Dark Box. Merits and education, carrier and social status would be fine — if found together with nature. The fusion limit mass (FULIMass ¦ Definition) is the second of the three.

The FIRST EARTH (E1) equation directly appears from

THERMO DYNAMICS PRIMARY ENERGY EQUIVALENTS (the TDPEE chart 2009)

connection: Deduction of Q ¦ PotentialBarrier — where Q is taken ¦ both with a complete absence in modern academia teaching system, because of

BASIC INTEGRAL, DERIVATIVE AND DIFFERENTIAL MATHEMATICS — read it and weep: comparing modern with related:

— related mathematics leaves no one behind.

Thermo dynamic primary energy equivalents chart has among other this:

pV = 2(1M)ma giving

p = (1M)2(m/V)a

= (1M)2ρa (celestial planetary) thermo dynamical equilibrium pressure

ρ present average body density KG/M³

a surface gravity constant Gm₂/r²

There is only one (our) Solar system — universal type — planetary mass body that has a positive over freeze temperature equivalent — planetary biological life provision:

Taking p as our known Earth (STP standard temperature and pressure) p=101325 Pa, the general gas law’s (pV=kT) relates p to a comparing end (planetary thermo-gravity) temperature for all our Solar system planets as follows:

T(°C) = 273.15[(1M)2ρa(p_{101325 Pa})^–1 – 1]

showing, proving, exposing and relating (read it and weep, again)

FULImass2023.ods Tabell2 A1+

Different end values appear depending on precision decimals in used constants.

Earth only — and wherever else it might be found in our universe on the equative given conditions. Roughly: 20°C. PerfectAssembly.

— Modern 1800+ academia has intrinsically, chemically and persistently worked hard to avoid any alike connectivity with Nature in its general cosmological development. Nothing of the kind is, what is known here, existing in modern academic quarters. Not one word. Again.

The SECOND EARTH (E2) equation is the one following in this presentation: the fusion limit mass (FULIMA). It is a test of the Planck constant h=mcr=6.62559 t34 JS TNED deduced atomic nucleus, the fundamental neutron h = mNc₀rN = 6.62559 t34 JS. Directly from the surface body conditions preceding a final celestial body’s density, shape and form, beginning from a Dmax condition, all primary celestial bodies can be classified with respect to a FULIMA in two basic categories: gas bodies (stars beginning from ca 6 Jupiter masses) and stone bodies (dead planets down to grains of sand and smaller). See further from FULIMAdefinition and Classification.

The THIRD EARTH (E3) equation , also perfectly eluded by the famous 1800+ modern academia acuity, is conventionally known as The TITIUS NUMBER SERIES — a simple arithmetical number series connecting the average planetary distances:

(4 + {0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 96, 192, 384, …})/10 ¦ (4+6)/10 relates to Earth = 1;

0.4 0.7 1 1.6 2.8 5.2 10 19.6 38.8 Titius

0.4 0.7 1 1.5 AS 5.2 9.5 19.2 39.4 measured rounded to 1 decimal

AS — THE ASTEROID BELT HAS VALUES 1.3 TO 3.2, AVERAGE 2.3 — Values, Sources and History, see HISTORIA

The Titius series connecting the present situation however has one flaw. It is the main reason why it was never accepted in modern academic astronomy physics: the »twin planets» Uranus and Neptune. Instead of (a series »expected») two values, there is only one for the twins: 19.6

The measured one decimals have 19.1819 for Uranus and 30.0578 for Neptune.

In TNED cosmology the explanation builds upon a resonant corresponding water drop recoil series (MilkyWay SolarSystems), including — at the moment of ejection — a twin drop, about to divide (fast Nicon camera photo experiments prove the principle), but not so yet realized. Again, all beginning from a primary cosmological Dmax situation (K-cell detonation).

— The TNED deduced (Deduction) mathematical resonant solution has the form

d = a₀2π2ⁿ/(4π/3) + d₀ = 3a₀2^n–1 + d₀

With d0 as first distance expansion, the factor 3a0 must be nullified i the case with n=1.

We employ a sequence dividing integer selector FI Φ of the form

(the function is the same as IF n<1 THEN d:=d₀) accordingly

REF = 2

P = (absn+n)/2/2 – 1

Φ = INT[1 – (absP – P)/2] ................... n|Φ= … ,₅1,₄1,₃1,₂1,₁0,₀0,_–10,…,_–n0 ;

RESULT:

Earth’sThirdEquation

d = Φ3 a₀2^n–1 + d₀

= Φ(3/4)a₁2^n–2 + d₀

The distance form for our planetary system then is satisfied (Titius series, 1700) by the integer form

a₀ = 5/100 = 0.05

d₀ = 2/5 = 0.4

as (EARTH 1) — see all the details in Deduction:

(4 + {0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 96, 192, 384, …})/10 ¦ (4+6)/10 relates to Earth = 1;

0.4 ¦ 0.7 ¦ 1 ¦ 1.6 ¦ 2.8 ¦ 5.2 ¦ 10 ¦ 19.6 ¦ 38.8 Titius1700

Other ejection series will have other coefficients:

Conclusion:

The EARTH series can only be realized in a Solar system with same provisions as our own.

Earth belongs to a celestial family mathematical resonant series having a Mother Sun.

See further in The possible Solar Systems in our Milky Way galaxy.

Nothing of these almost embarrassing basic mathematics ever came on the table of modern academic ideation. At least not for the visibility to deserve a known mentioning.

The FOURTH (E4) and FIFTH (E5) ¦ PRIME) EARTH equations follow from the second (FULIMAdefinition) which will be described in the following. In explicit, the fourth and fifth are detailed separately in Earth’s Five Equations. Part of those details are mentioned in the following text (separate links).

FULIMA INTRODUCTION

m0JSUBequilibrium: FULIMA

Basic details in CWONfromCAP, unless already familiar.

The Atomic Nucleus I — DeducingTHErZ ¦ Atomic Nucleus II — comparing nuclear physics ¦ Atomic Nucleus III — relating Earth crust composition

PRIMARY BODY SURFACE RIM PHYSICS — fusion limit mass

WHERE G-force and eFORCE ARE BALANCED

PRIMARY CELESTIAL BODIES FROM Dmax: WHERE GRAVITY AND ELECTRIC REPULSIVE FORCE exactly BALANCE

WHERE GRAVITATION balances ELECTRIC FORCE

TWO newly fresh ADJACENT HYDROGEN NUCLEI — BALANCING EXACTLY ON EACH OTHERS POTENTIAL BARRIER

about to fuse if equal, otherwise repulsive: more mass = gas bodies, less mass = stone bodies

The expanding Coulomb repelling electrical force is balanced by the Gravitational contracting gravity force — Where in Universe?

MATH:

calculating the fusion limit mass

m0JSUB = [e(n_PR²[2ρ²/9]^1/3π^7/6)^–1(k_9T9G^–1)^1/2]³ ; e = 1.602 t19 C

= (n_P)^–3(ρ)^–2 R^–6[e( [ 2/9 ]^1/3π^7/6)^–1(k_9T9G^–1)^1/2]³ ; [C([JM]²VM/CJM)]³

= (n_P)^–3 (ρ)^–2R^–6[K]³ ; K³ = 5.266 t28

= (n_e√2)^–3(ρ)^–2R^–6[K]³ ; n_e ≈ 5

= (n_e)^–3(ρ)^–2 R^–6[K/√2]³ ............. checked ; ρNOM = Dmax = 1.82 T17 KG/M³

---------------------------------------------------

m0JSUB/[K/√2]³ = (n_e)^–3(ρ)^–2R^–6 ; Rnom = r₀ = 1.37 Fermi = 1.37 t15 M

--------------------------------------------------

K = [C([KG]²VM/CJM)]³ ;

= [[KG]²V/J]³ ;

= [[KG]²V/VC]³ ;

= [[KG]²/C]³ ;

--------------------------------------------------

(n_e)³ = [K/√2]³(ρ)^–2R^–6/m0JSUB ;

(n_e) = [K/√2](ρ)^–2/3R^–2/m0JSUB^1/3 ;

(n_e) = [K]/(ρ)^2/3R²m0JSUB^1/3 √2 ;

The given Dmax conditions on the TNED deduced and related universal CWONfromCAP celestial body production:

m0JSUBequation: m0JSUBeq ¦ m0JSUBequilibrium

The FUSION LIMIT MASS (FULIMA) defines

• exact balance between converging gravitation (G) and diverging Coulomb (C) repulsion

• between two adjacent hydrogen atom nuclei (protons)

• balancing exactly on each others potential barrier =

• balancing exactly on the rim of each others circumscribed nuclear sphere.

• termed m0JSUB (»m zero J subject/substrate»): the fusion limit mass

Earth’s Second Equation

PRESSURE BASICS:

calculating the fusion limit mass

ρ = DmaxDENSITY (TNED N3m20¦15 Neutron masses, nominal 1.82 T17 KG/M³), Greek rho (r)

d = (ρrR)^–1 · 5.0094120 t10 KG ; d_K = 5.0094120 t10 KG

p = (F/A)_K

= k(Q/d)²/(πR)² ; Toroid nuclear pressure ¦ k = 1/4πε₀ ¦ ε₀ = 1/(4π t7 c₀²) C/VM

= ELECTRIC close nuclear REPULSIVE PRESSURE ; on the potential barrier RIM

= (F/A)_J ; Celestial surface body gravity pressure

= G(m/r)²/(4πr²) = G(m²/r⁴ = [4πρr/3]²)/4π

= G(4πρr/3)²/4π ; Coulomb opposing contractive pressure

= 4πG(4ρr/3)² ;

-----------------------------

k(Q/d)² = (πR)²G(4πρr/3)²/4π ; Q = e

= πG(2πρrR/3)² ;

(Q/d)² = πG(2πρrR/3)²/k

Q/d = (2πρrR/3)√(πG/k) ; Q = e

d = e/[(2πρrR/3)√(πG/k)] ; n_P = n_e × n_B ¦ n_B = √2

= (ρrR)^–1(2π/3)^–1e√k/πG ; (2π/3)^–1e√k/πG = d_K ¦ e/n_en_B = e/n_P ¦ n_en_B = 1 = n_P

= (ρrR)^–1 · 5.0094120 t10 C√(VM/C)/(JM/[KG]²) ; C√(VM/C)/(JM/[KG]²) = KG√CV/J = KG√CV/VC = KG

-----------------------------

ρ = m/V ; VSPH = 4πr³/3 ¦ ρ = 3m/4πr³ ¦ r = (3m/4πρ)^1/3 = (ρ)^–1/3(3m/4π)^1/3 ;

r = (3m/4πρ)

= (ρ)^–1/3(3m/4π)^1/3 ;

ρr = ρ(ρ)^–1/3(3m/4π)^1/3

= ρ^2/3(3m/4π)^1/3 ;

d = [ρ^2/3(3m/4π)^1/3R]^–1 · d_K ; d_K = (2π/3)^–1e√k/πG = 5.0094 t10 KG

= R^–1[ρ^2/3(3m/4π)^1/3]^–1 · d_K ;

-----------------------------

d = R ; THE ACTUAL nuclide separation

R² = d_K/[ρ^2/3(3m/4π)^1/3] ;

= (4π/3m)^1/3d_K/ρ^2/3 ;

(3m/4π)^1/3 = d_K/R²ρ^2/3

m = (4π/3)(d_K/R²ρ^2/3)³ ; m0JSUB (MATH ¦ Chart1 ¦ Chart2)

= (4π/3)(d_K³/R⁶ρ²)

= d_K³ · ρ^–2 · R^–6 · 4π/3 ; checked

-----------------------------

In the original work (Apr2004 FUSIONSGRÄNSMASSAN) the below (school book average) constants were used along with the presented result:

DmaxREF: m0JSUBequation

Sw.Dmax ¦ Eng.Dmax — nom. 1.82 T17 KG/M³

m0JSUB = 6.80016 T24 KG ¦ d_K = (2π/3)^–1e√k/πG ¦ n_e ¦ n_B ¦ n_P = n_en_B ¦ k ¦ r₀ ¦ R ¦ Dmax — neutron mass body density

FULImass.ods Tabell 1 F1+

During the proceeding works in UH (UniverseHistory) up to present, more precise constants were related (links as above/below), reflecting the comparing (present, more precise) results:

If we hold on to the first (2004) result figure 6.8001554 rounded 6.80016

m0JSUB = 6.80016 T24 KG

the ne-factor ≈ 5 reflects its sensitivity to the slightly different constants:

in row 4 the ne = 5.02510020 with the schoolbook’s G = 6.67 figure gives the same m0Jsub as

in row 5 by ne = 5.02506246 with the TNED IAU-tested G-factor figure 6.67010000933003

FULImass.ods Tabell 1 F1+

———————————————

G = 6.67010000933003 t11 JM/[KG]² ¦ The Electric Constant ¦ CosmoA — gravitational energy equivalents

Difference rows 2¦3: Row2 (2004) uses the more rounded constants for r0=1.37 and Dmax=1.82 and k=8.98743.

Difference rows 2¦3: Row3 (2023) uses the more specified constants for r0, Dmax and k, with a slightly higher m0JSUB value.

Difference rows 2¦4: Row4 (2023) uses the 2004 m0JSUB value to specify a corresponding ne-value 5.02500120.

Difference rows 2¦5: Row5 (2023) uses the 2004 m0JSUB value to specify a corresponding ne-value 5.02506246 — using the (2018+) IAU tested G-value as given above, enhanced from the simpler (HOP1967) 6.67 t11 value.

G3/G2¦G4¦G5 = 101.51% — a max 1.51% deviation.

In any way it is clear that the ne-factor has (great) sensitivity significance in our attempt to determine »an exact constant for all cases».

The thing is (TNED says) :

As the atomic nucleus is DYNAMIC — energy exchange dynamics — we would expect a corresponding true ne-factor to have minor variations — especially under particle accelerator conditions.

In this presentation, we will continue to use this first m0Jsub figure 6.80016 T24 KG, as it also (2004+) was used for further deducing details in concern of the celestial mass body complex (DiaSQUARE — kDetermination).

Explain:

All celestial bodies and their produced atoms (CWONfromCAP) can be classified from a k=1 m0JSUB prefix using a (rough) general nuclear separation concept (as in the fusion limit mass determination). So the FULIMA m0JSUB quantity will serve a universal purpose.

Classification: DmaxREF

Short:

All NatKonBe TwoCASES Dmax (nB) PRIME possible actual NuclideSeparations k=d/r₀=1 define a standard [GC] universal fusion balancing limit mass m0JSUB (6.80016 T24 KG) dividing all other celestial primary bodies in two classes: heavier (gas type) and lighter (stone type); mJ>m0JSUB and mJ<m0JSUB.

THREE J-BODY SURFACE CONDITIONS DISTINCT CASES exist : correspondingly mJ>m0JSUB, mJ=m0JSUB, and mJ<m0JSUB.

In simplified typography designated [↓GC][GC][GC↓].

C denotes force associated with the neutron morphological strength in its coldPlasmaState (LGD ¦ nuclear fragmentation — nuclear reaction law ¦ NeutronSquareFundamentals — REGAINING ¦ negative divergence) immediately preceding divergence ignition (positive c-gravitational space) which

successively will be replaced with a Coulomb force as the neutron enters positive divergence and decays to a hydrogen atom with a proton nucleus.

G denotes gravitational force.

With a possible spread of n neutrons in any arbitrary fusion ring, beginning at the J-body’s center radius x=0 by n/A=0 and ending at the J-body’s radius x=1=r by n/A=1, A the atom’s mass number and n/A the neutron quote (DiaSQUARE), there is — mathematically — one, and only one unique non periodic function (here, a curve set) beginning at n/A=0 at J-body’s radial variable (x=0) and ending on n/A=1 at x=r=1. That function is (the neutron quote function)

(n/A)^x = x^k = Ø^x

Further mathematically related in

the original Swedish edition in NeutronQuoteEquation

including its related derivative.

As discussed from FULIMAr0. Only known present celestial planetary mass closest to the m0JSUB solution (6.80016 T24 KG) is our Earth type:

5.975 T24 KG = m0JSUB minus 12.13%

Nearest Earth, planet Venus would be the closest alternative (Chart1 ¦ Chart2). But as seen, Venus’ lower mass leaves more than 25% ejected primary mass in the FULIMA evaluation. As the balancing conditions [GC] favors least possible losses (energy principle economics), Venus is excluded and Earth is selected as the only here known k=1 representative. See the resulting comparing diagrams in FULIMAr0 and FULIMAÑ (TheFULIMAÑresolution — rZresolution2023).

The neutron quote function favors, as we see, an automatic J-body centra core region where n/A (practically) equals zero. That in turn favors the TNED deduced exothermal fusion two groups, odd and even, beginning from only neutrons (0n1→1H1→1H2 ..), ending on a profound Iron Core: no heavier atoms can be produced in that core zone, because such heavier atomic production needs nuclear agents with higher neutron quote. And such will only be found outside the core zone. The neutron quote function’s Earth core occupies some 20-25% of the actual spherical radius (so we can calculate the content, and compare with present science community estimates — based on instrumental seismic measures and theories).

consequential mathematics — no consensus. It is — or it isn’t.

With x=r=1 it is given that [TheDIA Ø in (n/A)^x = x^k = Ø^x] Ø=1 independent of k. Meaning:

—The function’s simplest form simply can be written

Ø = n/A

— in explicit the vertical y axis scale: the general element distribution classification

HOW, AND WHY, A CERTAIN BAND OF ATOMS IS FORMED IN THAT SPECIFIC REGION

Ø ........... neutron quote

n ........... number of neutrons in a given fusion ring, see GRAD-basics

A ........... mass number — the number of neutrons that formed the end product,

same as: number of building neutrons = Round AtomicWeight — Atomic weight = mATOM / u = U,

always a whole number.

The extension of the complex leads further to Related StarPHYSICS — which will not be further mentioned in this presentation (needs three separate htm-documents).

— Modern Academia 1800+ missed all of it. Not one atom included. Never heard of.

As related (ne and nB) in TwoCASES, the crucial factor is what effective (linear) electric force field that remains after the ne part (nominal 5). reduction — as it has to be estimated (unless otherwise suggested).

The following diagrams, tables and mathematics exposes the TNED related physics and mathematics general picture on the ne parametric variations. There are only two competing celestial masses to compare: The m0Jsub two nearest candidates Venus and Earth on their present masses respectively 4.870 and 5.975 T24 KG.

Conditions:

Deducing the fusion limit mass

The IronCore production (PICON), first Dmax J-body central core exothermal fusion phase, involves (MOS) an implosion: →←

LighterToHeavier

CWONfromCAP ¦ HowBegin

— The J-body central core (GRAD) 2 1H1 → 1H2 (Discussion) releases or produces an empty space void, a space volume vacancy, as the toroid form factor (ReHofstadter1956) changes between the neutron/proton’s N3m15 (DEDUCTION) to the deuteron’s N3m2 (Derivation). As the high Dmax G-pressure fills the void from top to center — the incompressibility of the atomic nucleus: gravitation, the neutron h = mNc0rN fundamental atom cannot be compressed — a lossless recoil is inevitable:

— Some of the J-body primary surface neutron mass (escape velocity v=√2Gm₂/r¦ CosmoBasics) will be ejected from the J-body.

m0JSUBequilibrium

FULIMAr0: FULIMA ¦ FULIMAÑ — TheFULIMAÑresolution

———————————————

BalanceCondition

See also the complementary R = Ñ solution result in FULIMAÑ. r0 is the 1.37 Fermi proton radius deduced from the rN value h/mNc0 in Neutron Planck constant h=mNc0rN=6.62559 t34 JS.

Apparently independent of the ne-value, the nearest possible (≈ 7 T24 KG) m0JSUB J-body is our (typical universal ≈ 6 T24) Earth.

See also an evaluation on all (as our own) The Possible Solar Systems in Milky Way (6007).

Explain:

Conditions and prerequisite

THE CENTRAL CORE (GRAD, Iron Core) FIRST EXOTHERMAL FUSION PHASE

—————————————————————————————————————

If the (FULIMA) fusion limit mass candidating primary planetary mass (EARTH¦VENUS) is expected to give off a smaller part of itself as a waste

the central J-body mass implosion in the first central fusion phase from hydrogen (N3m15 ¦ 15.0056) to deuterium (N3m2 ¦ 1.928)

• The Dmax enveloping toroid block volume V=4r³ is reduced [1/√2]³ almost three times [2.83] — Deuteron2CON

• The resulting fusion product 1H2 nucleus has twice the neutron mass

• The Dmax density in the Deuteron imploded core section —— some 20% of the J-body radius, DiaSQUARE —

• is multiplied more then 5 times [ 2 × 2.8 = 5.6] — within t20 seconds [ FusionRATES] —

• all [DiaSQUARE] central neutrons provided ideally simultaneously 1H1 decayed [ GRAD ]

forces the J- body to contract in filling the released space, thereby (the incompressible atomic nucleus) creating (escape velocity) a mass ejecting recoil effect with a following minor mass ejection — no other explanation is known (here) in related physics (CLAIR ¦ Jm-Proof);

MODERN ACADEMIC IDEA OF THE ATOMIC AND NUCLEAR NATURE HAS LONG AGO LOST TRACK OF THE DEDUCED — consequential mathematics — EXPLANATIONS TO OUR GENERAL COSMOLOGICAL PHENOMENA — THANKS TO ITS CHEER FOR THE RELATIVITY THEORY. See all explained in AllKeplerMath. Planck equivalents it is: Max Planck was right. Albert Einstein — and his adopted way — was wrong [THEvicERROR]:

• Gravitation is NOT a particle [ BackGROUND ]. But modern academic inventing consensus has made its entire teaching system to reflect exactly that:

• The conditions were better year 1311.

• Modern Academy [ 1800+ ] lost every single natural scientific IDEA of it — instead beginning to INVENT. There you go. Say again: disclaim:

• We surrender immediately.

»the initial pulsar principle» accounting continuously in related star physics only:

all J-masses from ca 6 Jupiter masses (StarPhysicsLimitMasses) and higher, the star limit mass; See

The Sun Fusion Period Deduction ¦ STAR PHYSICS I ¦ STAR PHYSICS II ¦ PULSAR MATHEMATICS

then the resulting candidate present remaining mass (E¦V) in any case must be lower than the fusion limit mass FULIMA:

• FULIMA must be greater than the present planetary candidate (E¦V)

• If (E¦V) is greater, none of them will do.

RESULT:

With the nominal FULIMA = 6.8 T24 KG, both (E 5.975¦V 4.870) counts as candidates.

Energy economics

But: The (FULIMA) fusion limit mass must also be THE NEAREST greater than the candidate (E¦V)

• if (energy principle: shortest, fastest, lowest possible losses) the waste should reflect lowest possible energy losses: most effective physics.

Conclusion:

So the (V 4.870 29%) VENUS candidate becomes excluded and the (E 5.975 13%) EARTH selected as the FULIMA nearest available planetary mass — in our Solar system:

• and there are no other candidates, as we know;

REF:

Titius Number Series, see deduction in The SolarSystemResonantSeries,

FULIMAdefinition: CLASSIFICATION

Consequential definition, the fusion limit mass

The fusion limit mass m₀JSUB is that Dmax J-body mass which on its primary unaffected mass surface retains the most of its exact balancing gravity contracting and electric repulsive force between two ideally g-vertically adjacent newly neutron decayed hydrogen nuclei (protons).

If the gravity force is the stronger, the J-body will envelope more hydrogen nuclei (gas body). If the gravity force is the weaker, the J-body will release more hydrogen nuclei (stone body). In general: the less J-mass, the less proportionally ejected primary mass. The central after first exothermal fusion phase recoil force follows the primary gravitational mass pressure.

— This entire complex connects to the TNED deduced CWONfromCAP results.

(CLAIR ¦ Jm-Proof — relating the ejection mass energy mathematics in Earth’s case).

— Modern academic science community has NONE of these aspects in physics. The complex connects entirely to TNED: related physics and mathematics.

———————————————

FUSIONSGRÄNSMASSAN ¦ PrimaryMasses — KcellAnalys2018A.ods Tabell7 A24 — FULImass2023.ods Tabell1 G8 ¦ kDETERMINATION

PRIME:

CALCULATING CELESTIAL PRIMARY MASSES FROM PRESENT MASSES— using the EARTH FULIMA (6.80016 T24 KG) resultant 5.975 T24 KG as the universal index of preference

———————————————

FULImass2023.ods Tabell1 G5

Originally this now (2018+) directly calculable primary mass complex was developed from an iteration process (IteratorMechanics) — which showed to have (definite) limitations in numerical representations (PrimaryMasses). Later (2018) a general graphical function was extracted from the iterations, exposing a logarithmic more mathematically convenient solution — where the present mass also includes sand grains and even smaller (nano particles — originally Dmax neutron beads). The input (purple) example above uses the present Sun mass. The table context is more detailed and related in

kDETERMINATION ¦ NuclideSEPARATION (J-body atomic production, element distributions) ¦ DiaSQUARE.

———————————————

POTENTIAL BARRIER

FULIMAr0

FULIMAÑ: FULIMAr0 ¦ Ñ = r₀ × 1.9952135487 ¦ r₀ = ProtonRADIUS = 1.3662 t15 M ≈ 1.37 Fermi = 1.37 t15 M

Balancing Conditions

The FULIMAÑ RESOLUTION:

Consequential mathematics (COMA)

———————————————

BalanceCondition

Anyway we reckon, the all picture available results point to the main resolving fact: Only the present Earth mass 5.975 T24 KG matches the ne-factor suggested m0JSUB 6.8 T24 KG solution — on the condition of a minimum wasted part of the initial J-body mass. In Earth’s case (6.8–5.975)/6.8 = 12.13%. About the shrink from wet to dry clay.

rZresolution2023: FULIMAÑ

Thne Ñ part Dmax connection in the investigation never receives physical focus

THE rZ RESOLUTION (Jul2023)

TheFULIMAÑresolution

NOTHING IN THIS PRESENTATION APPLIES TO ANY MENTIONED MODERN ACADEMIA CONCEPT OR STATUS.

THE SUBJECT LIES PERFECTLY OUTSIDE ANY HERE KNOWN PRESENT SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY IMAGINATION.

THE READER WILL NOT FIND ONE SINGLE WORD OR HINT IN AVAILABLE PRESENT ACADEMIA LITERATURE.

The above right CalcSTRIPE is found in FULImass2023.ods Tabell1 Q1+. Details in the DeducingTHErZ link below.

BECAUSE the rZ (DeducingTHErZ — ReHofstadter1956) has an unequivocal unmistakable single unitive physical meaning, property and definition,

and so as such related dynamically to the nuclear gravity circle (r=r0 for hydrogen) interaction physics with other nuclei — rZ = r0 for Z=1; A=1 —

the Ñ alternative on its significantly lower Dmax value will never come into question in the real physical experimental world — TNED related physics says.

Explain:

Consequential mathematics (COMA).

A CHARGED ATOMIC NUCLEUS has only one equatively expressible charge disc nuclear well radius rZ:

That is as illustrated: the one close associated to the nuclear central gravity circle (r) extension.

— For all other nuclei than the proton (r=r0), the difference r – rZ between the nuclear gravity circle radius (r) and the actual nuclear well disc charge radius (rZ) slightly increases.

— rZ is always the slightly smaller part.

So, even if we relate a corresponding smaller Dmax value adopted for the larger Ñ sized nuclear spinning rim, it makes absolutely nothing to the actual nuclear well disc charge extension (because the r₀ dynamical part — inevitably connected to Planck constant — is associated with the corresponding Dmax part: cannot be disconnected). It is, and stays, related to r0 Z A — r0 the actually deduced ToroidNuclearRADIUS central factor

r = ½r₀A^½ nuclear toroid gravity circle radius

If a lower Dmax connects to a larger (Ñ) toroid extension, the defined rZ must follow such an extension. That so because rZ is bound to the Planck ring r0 by definition (Hydrogen Spectrum Energy Circle) in connection to the Planck ring neutron rN in Planck constant h = mNc0rN.

See all details with links in ProtonRADIUS. rZ has Planck constant connection through

r0/rN = √8/[1+√3] =1.035 276 18

— So: Given the r0 connection to rZ, the Ñ extension with the lower Dmax (on the same rZ) never receives a physical meaning. It simply does not count.

But it would be less informatively educating to leave that remark outside this presentation — as it conveniently now has been offered a slot of its own. If any further problem would arise on this quest, we have at least these claims to proceed on as a first bench mark.

What is so special about this rZ factor?

PERHAPS THE MOST SIMPLE ANSWER:

— You don’t want to know.

Explaining all the world collected ”nuclear rms charge radii” data (Angeli2004) — as explained and deduced by TNED — based on the collected and TNED compared results from the early (1956) Hofstadter group experiments on electron scattering: the nuclear charge distributions on a set of different atomic nuclei. See the whole story from ReHofstadter1956. The final collected graphs in TheWholePicture ¦ PlusCUBEgraph. »Case closed».

There is no ”charge radius” in atomic nuclear physics.

There is no ”uniformly distributed” nuclear charge.

The atomic nucleus has no spherical shape.

Not even close to.

But the experimental physics has features (cannot measure nuclear size) blocking the modern aces to see that, directly. TNED it is. Always was.

A walk in the park.

Disclaim that, and we will surrender immediately.

Shorter ANSWER:

It explains the entire particle nuclear scientific community experimental physics.

Say again.

FULIMAÑ

Ñr0: ne ¦ nB

r₀ = ProtonRADIUS = 1.3662 t15 M ≈ 1.37 Fermi = 1.37 t15 M

——————————————————————————

BEGINNING FROM THE NEUTRON AND THE PROTON

Nuclear gravity circle radius ½r₀A^½ (A>1) and nuclear rim radius (A=1: Ñ=r₀ × 1.9952135487 ¦ A>1: Ñ=r₀ × 1.9641016151)

WHAT MEANS RESPECTIVELY r₀ and Ñ?

♦ Gravitation — the fundamental atom, the neutron: mass — is NOT a particle [ HoldingPOINTS ¦ BackGROUND ]:

♦ Mass physics cannot be explained by material — particle — physics;

THAT WAS THE 1800+ MODERN ACADEMIA GREATEST MISTAKE: TO INVENT consensus IDEAS as if.

AND IT ALSO SEEMS THAT THE INSTRUMENTAL [1960-1999] EPOCH’S STANDARD VALUES HAVE MORE CREDIT IN NATURAL — EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS — CONDITIONS THAN THE LATER [2000+] COMPUTERIZED MODELED partly on such established invented ideas ADJUSTED DITTO — THE IAU TEST 2018 AND FOLLOWING [ AllKeplerMath ], as exposed and compared in TNED related physics. Meaning, frankly: MAC is done. Disclaim:

The instance has lost its presumed credit to natural science: knowledge. Not consensus.

Instead of knowledge, the instance executes in academia consensus: classic fascistic idealism. By DRIFT. Not plan. »We decide over you».

Explain:

Planck constant h=6.62559 t34 JS THE PLANCK RING defines the fundamental atom, The Neutron (Chadwick 1932) as

h = mN · c0 · rN ¦ mH neutron mass 1.0086652u, u = m[c12]/12 ¦ c0 = 2.99792458 T8 M/S ¦ rN neutron gravity circle radius: h/mc0 ≈ 1.32 Fermi = 1.32 t15 M

From analogies, equivalents and results in SPECTRUM (related physics, enhanced Bohr mathematics), the calculated energy circle associated with the hydrogen atom spectrum offers a way to deduce the (already HOP adopted) standard (1960+) value 1.37 Fermi for the proton radius r0. This result also (excellently) confirms the TNED deduced NeutronSQUARE result ratio between neutron and proton radii (r0/rN = √8/[1+√3] =1.035 276 18) — also in accord with the related nuclear decaying dynamics. These results also connect further to the neutron square related and calculated atomic masses (EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATIONS) — for further experimental comparison.

Neutron Dmax

——————

r₀ 1.8204698 T17 KG/M³ ¦ Planck constant related, nominal Dmax

Ñ 2.0785978 T16 KG/M³ ¦ Dmax(r₀/Ñ) = 8.7581630 ¦ min = max × 0.75 (rounded approximations)

see TheFULIMAÑresolution

Results, conclusion:

Meaning:

By any means, the r0 proton radius term (1.37 Fermi) connects to the Planck constant (the neutron) by a concept of dynamics (particle accelerator experimentation). As dynamics always relates a center or a morphological preference of gravity — balance, equilibrium: a=dv/dt in every moment — the r0 association unequivocally always points dynamically to a gravity circle (r[A>1], r0[A=1], Ñ illustrated in ConfirmingThe71, A = mass number).

— That will be apparent and obvious in explicit in particle (electron scattering) experiments.

Exemplifying r0 and Ñ — experimentally

An exotic example directly connecting the TNED related proton nucleus is the (TNED pioneering) Krisch group results 1979¦1987 on spin polarized proton collisions. If it wasn’t for those ice breaking experiments, this UH TNED production would never have been launched (InternetAug2008). Most certainly not. Ever. See (Sw.) from TNEDbegin.

MASS NUMBER (A) in related physics (also in general) defines the number of neutrons employed to build a specific atom. It is oriented and designated typically in general as

_ZATOM^A with

Z the atom number beginning from 1 — number of (e⁺) +electron charges quanta associated with the atom’s nucleus and the same number of (e^—) enveloping –charge quanta (number of electrons)

A (conventional 1900+ »number of neutrons and protons, nucleons») the number of neutrons that built the ATOM. See also

The Atomic Mass Unit ¦ Clarifying TheUequation — atomic mass and atomic weight ¦ The Atomic MassDefectEquation

ExemplifyingÑr0:

PlanckEquivalents: ELECTRICALLY ACCELERATED PARTICLES EXPOSE MASS INCREASE — in TNED: size change by energy exchange

WHAT THE F-WORD IS Ñ? N-tilde or TildeN (»nTIL» ..)

Returning to the ice breaking huge energy particle experiments Krisch group results 1979¦1987

The ideal radial spin size of the TNED atomic nucleus.

— .. look .. :

Investigating (Nuclear Magnetic Moment) the electromagnetic properties of the TNED Planck ring toroid nuclear structure, do allow the above Krisch group (here revisited illustrated extracted dynamics) results:

The »thin» (ReHofstadter1956) protonic (N3m20¦15) spin morphology perfectly allows

the seemingly impossible action that two head on about to collide protons (shared spin properties) can ”pass through each other”:

THE PARTICLE IDEA DOES NOT APPLY IN NUCLEAR PHYSICS. No way.

MASS PHYSICS CAN NOT BE EXPLAINED BY MATERIAL PHYSICS. NOT EVEN ON MY BEST DAY.

Gravitation is not a particle. Claim whatever you want. But modern academy does not [ want to ] understand the concept.

Meaning — THE SIZE OF THE ATOMIC NUCLEUS, basic studies Jul2008:

THE PARTICLE IDEA — like two material physical billiard balls colliding — does not apply in nuclear physics.

EXCEPT ON VERY LOW PARTICLE COLLIDING ENERGIES — THE SPIN PROPERTY HIDES THE INNER DETAILS ON LOW, EXPOSES THEM ON HIGH ENERGIES.

ReHofstadter1956 — same principal / principle result on examining charge distribution by electron scattering.

Two antiparallel spinning protons CAN (says Krisch group results) »partially merge — size propel around without merging at all». No sir.

So it is in any case the neutron dynamic gravity circle radius factor (rN) that counts in our Planck (NeutronSquare) constant h = mN · c0 · rN = 6.62559 t34 JS.

Planck constant does not change:

THE SIZE (Ñ — Alt+0209) OF THE ATOMIC NUCLEUS (basically the neutron and the proton) hence »has weired properties» — definitely not allowing a material physical solid definite particle definition.

Also meaning:

— In practical experimentation (»without proper education ..»): Ñ — nuclear size — can NOT be measured experimentally. No way.

Meaning:

Addressing a definite size to an atom nucleus may very well

Nuclear gravity circle radius ½r₀A^½ (A>1) and nuclear rim radius (A=1: Ñ=r₀ × 1.9952135487 ¦ A>1: Ñ=r₀ × 1.9641016151)

give us the ideal toroid top spinning nuclear rim extension (Ñ). But as it — apparently — has a (partial) ”soft” nature,

its definite quantity (Ñ), apparently as suggested, loses its meaning in a mutual nuclear interaction — or can do so. In what way, and in what extension, depends on the circumstances — of which we (this author) not yet (Dec2023) has seen the end of that physical explanatory (experimental) complex. The Ñ size quantity then in the end applies to a space region isolated idea of only one single atom and its nucleus — safely separated from all other nuclei: the ideal rim and edge metric toroid nuclear extending spinning size, Ñ.

As such, this explanation is just a (perfect) explanation of the 1979¦1987 Krisch group results — as far as there are no physical phenomenal objections to be accounted for.

It follows that the Dmax aspect — maximum packed neutrons in a (almost perfect spherical) neutron mass body, both will and can have (significantly) different Dmax values, depending on mutual nuclear constellations.

Our only safe preference: Planck constant h = mcr —

Kepler area momentum (periodic system’s deduction), times mass:

h = mK = mvr ¦ nuclear structure

Our only universally known safe and solid preference is the Planck constant h=mNc0rN — the fundamental neutron atom (about to produce the first stable atom, the hydrogen atom, and its defined r0 gravity circle). And so, our only direct safe Dmax quantity will no doubt refer to the dynamic function of a (spin) gravity circle (r0/rN = √8/[1+√3] =1.035 276 18), the fundamental (stable atom) Proton Radius r0. The the term ”Dmax” then becomes vindicated as the maximum neutron (block) density on the hydrogen atom’s nucleus’ r0 dynamics extension credit. And (Dec2023) we know of no other way to put the context.

Ñ APPLICATION EXAMPLE

As a further extended delicate example of » the near relationship» between r₀ and Ñ in a Dmax related basic physics complex (the fusion limit mass), see the FULIMAÑ result compared with the FULIMAr₀ result.

FULImass2023.ods Tabell1 G14+

Compiled 4 results exposing the Ñ Dmax close result, table bottom, to the first three r0¦rN Dmax preferences. Meaning: 5 or 5.4 makes little difference with respect to a general dynamic atomic nucleus. It is capable of exposing size changes (ne-factor ¦ TwoCASES) depending on excited conditions, or if subject to a particle accelerator voltage (general mass increase, see Planck Equivalents explanations and comparison in ThePlanckWay).

We cannot really say or determine which one of them would be »the most accurate» — as we neither have, nor can relate, any definite quantity to the ne factor: It anyway reflects dynamical behavior in energy exchanging situations (the nucleus can vary its size, depending on circumstances): all three parameters ne, r=½r₀A^½ and Ñ have inwardly minor fluctuating differences. However, as a representative (here in UH) as above, we relate nuclear dynamics to the proton radius factor r₀ (general nuclear gravity circle radius, r) as connected to Planck constant h=m_Nc₀r_N through the TNED deduced NeutronSquare’s r₀/r_N = √8/[1+√3].

— »A walk in the Park».

So again by all means: the atomic nucleus is in no way to be understood in any resemblance to a material particle or any of the material particle physics properties. No way.

If definite ideas are bound to make such associations — unless educated (for research) — the end result will most certainly reflect delusive cosmological ideas.

Present scientific community has deep problems in accepting such a basic natural foundation, no doubt. But on the other hand, the doors are always open: Disclaim, and we will surrender immediately.

See further the comparing results in

FULIMAÑ — TheFULIMAÑresolution¦ FULIMAr₀.

Ñr0

BalanceCondition:

PRIMARY BODY SURFACE RIM PHYSICS — fusion limit mass

WHERE G-force and eFORCE ARE BALANCED

PRIMARY CELESTIAL BODIES FROM Dmax: WHERE GRAVITY AND ELECTRIC REPULSIVE FORCE exactly BALANCE

WHERE GRAVITATION balances ELECTRIC FORCE

TWO newly fresh ADJACENT HYDROGEN NUCLEI — BALANCING EXACTLY ON EACH OTHERS POTENTIAL BARRIER

about to fuse if equal, otherwise repulsive: more mass = gas bodies, less mass = stone bodies

The expanding Coulomb repelling electrical force is balanced by the Gravitational contracting gravity force — Where in Universe?

ToroidRadiusExtension: Balance

TNED TOROID 3D NUCLEAR MODELS — originally constructed for UniverseUhistory in Windows 95 with the FreeWare computer program Simply 3D.

GravityCenterTheorem — Guldin’s Rules [Paul Guldin 1577-1643] [ perimeters and areas in a rotationally related body].

FusionRATE — ideal exothermal fusion time from Dmax. The R form can be either R=r0 or R = Ñ. See details in TheFULIMAÑresolution ¦ DeducingTHErZ ¦ GravityCIRCLE.

CONSIDERING ONLY THE IDEAL STRAIGHT (gravity opposed) NET ELECTRIC FORCE:

c₀PREFERENCES — dynamic and static:

calculating the fusion limit mass

BradleyNuclearCoefficient: nB

BRADLEY NUCELAR COEFFICIENT

Static:

The effective electric field propagates through space along the shortest fastest least resistive path. Ideally it means that the electric force works directly along the ideal (parallel) field lines between the two (disc formed) charges (e).

Dynamic:

The electric field lines between two parallel discs (atomic nuclei idealized) having the same rotational spin direction and angular velocity work through two different physical preferences. The spinning mass (Planck constant h= mNc0rN, the neutron, and shortly after [12-14min], the Hydrogen atom), and the intermediate empty space (c0).

— As light (electric fields) does not connect kinetics (EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATIONS, the Solar Eclipses 1919+ Expeditions), the spin velocity (v) and the intermediated field space propagation through ITS (local gravitational dependency) light (c) divergence/propagation are not additive: c and v does not add up (THEvicError). The same principle counts for the James Bradley discovered (1725, published 1729) Aberration effect — starlight to Earth is affected by Earths local dominant gravitational field, and the sight line deviates from true straight depending on (Earth’s rotation, Earth’s solar orbit) angle of observation. As with the Michelson and Morley Experiments (1881+), Earth’s velocity (v) trough space, and light’s local Earth gravitational dominant propagation (c) are neither additive: no observed v+c effect.

— In TNED (Planck constant h= mNc0rN, the neutron, and shortly after [12-14min], the Hydrogen atom) the atomic nucleus (mass, charge, spin) has only one spin velocity preference (what we know) to be used for a general calculation (for further experimental tests): c0 = 2.99792458 T8 M/S. We (UH) use it to calculate the minimum fusion time — one turn — where two (exothermally) fusing nuclei spend their time from fusion begin to product finished. That is, new atomic product work time. See FusionRATES.

— In this dynamic spin case the nuclear spin direction (c0) has no effect on the intermediate space (outside the nuclear surface) between our two near testing hydrogen atom nuclei (protons). So: there will be a skewed (aberration, or electric displacement) electric field direction lag in space, connection a corresponding »Bradley Coefficient» between space and spinning nuclei (the field lines spiral, ideally, between the nuclei).

— As space ideally also has no kinetical c0 preference, the net vector result will be a 1/√2 ideal electric field reduction. It reflects on the electron charge as being (ideally linearly) reduced by 30% between the two facing spinning protons:

nB = √2 maxValue Bradley nuclear coefficient — close [ outside each others potential barriers ] general v/c nuclear electric field reduction range parameter:

mutually close electrically attracting/repelling nuclei

BalanceCondition

TwoCASES: ne

e NUCLEAR DISTRIBUTION:

calculating the fusion limit mass

Basic Objects: Hydrogen nuclei (protons) Z = 1e « see also DeducitngTHErZ (ReHofstadter1956)

TWO CASES OF NUCLEAR ELECTRON CHARGE DISTRIBUTION

Applying the PressureBASICS rotational spin mathematics concurrent with the TNED deduced toroid top spin surface

It so happened — using the library schoolbook approximated natural constants 2004 — that the e reducing ne-facor 5 was selected for a nominal test, as evaluated above. The fusion limit mass value on the deduced m0JSUB equation then became 6.80016 T24 KG. See diagrams and tables in FULIMAr0.

CASE 1:

Hydrogen nuclei

— electron charge e generatrix = 2π(R/2)

distributed evenly over the entire top toroid spin

Case 1:

The vertical toroid ring circle perimeter generating the toroid shape through the toroid’s horizontal (gravity) circle, becomes the static generatrix (eC) for the entire toroid surface e-charge.

— 1/4 of eC is a first estimated representation of the effective ideal straight electric field strength in affecting an adjacent near facing proton spouse. The other field line contributions have (an estimated) poor connection to the actual electric force between the two near facing protons.

— With a further margin, a nominal and final 1/5 eC is taken for the coming tests of the theory as the actual effective e-charge.

ne: TwoCASES ¦ nB ¦ neILLUSTRATED

e := e/n_en_B electron mass charge quantum — e = 1.602 t19 C (Millikan Nobel Prise 1923)

n_e = 5 ideal linear effective electric charge action reduction

— close nuclei, still outside or exactly on exothermal fusion barrier

n_P = n_en_B total nuclear electric charge reduction product

CASE 2:

Hydrogen nuclei

— electron charge e generatrix = 2π(R/2)/2 = πR/2

distributed only half ways evenly over the central top toroid spin well

Case 2:

The vertical toroid ring circle perimeter generating the toroid shape through the toroid’s horizontal (gravity) circle, can equally on the same net quantity as in the Case 1 perimeter be divided into two equal halves, doing exactly the same spinning work through the horizontal gravity circle.

— The proportions will (ideally) be preserved as in Case 1:

e := e/n_en_B electron mass charge quantum — e = 1.602 t19 C (Millikan Nobel Prise 1923)

n_e = 5 ideal linear effective electric charge action reduction

— close nuclei, still outside or exactly on exothermal fusion barrier

n_P = n_en_B total nuclear electric charge reduction product

It should be noted that (ATA/CAT TNED theory and mathematics) the atomic nucleus (certainly) has dynamical properties allowing its ring width to expand (and contract [Arc physics theory]) — under specially high energetic conditions. Simultaneously, we would expect that the way e is distributed over the nuclear surface, also will expose (some) dynamic feature. So, the two cases 1 and 2 will serve as a (possible) reminder of the dynamical nature of the atomic nucleus, according to TNED related physics and mathematics.

neILLUSTRATED: ne

Conclusion: Case 1 ¦ Case 2

Either alternative preserves the (idealized) specific test on the Coulomb attractive/repulsive force between two near facing TNED related protons.

TwoCASES

RESULTS:

In explicit: comparing gravity circle (r=½r₀A^½) and nuclear size (Ñ, »n-tilde») results

RESULTING DIAGRAMS, TABLES AND CALCULATIONS

content:

Closest comparing test planets — see FULIMAr0 and FULIMAÑ :

mEARTH 5.975 T24 KG

mVENUS 4.870 T24 KG

m0JSUBequilibrium:

m0JSUB = (n_e)^–3(ρ)^–2 R^–6[K/√2]³

PRESSURE BASICS:

m0JSUB = d_K³ · ρ^–2 · R^–6 · 4π/3

DmaxREF:

m0JSUB spread sheet cell tabled results comparisons — 2004¦2023

FULIMAr0:

m0JSUB tabled diagram results

PRIME:

CALCULATING CELESTIAL PRIMARY MASSES FROM PRESENT MASSES — m0JSUB results

FULIMAÑ:

m0JSUB tabled diagram results — The FULIMAÑ RESOLUTION, rZresolution2023

Ñr0:

explaining the terms

BradleyNuclearCoefficient:

nuclear spin electric interaction details, further related in

TwoCASES:

explaining provisions — TNED related nuclear charge physics

ShortSUMMINGCaseHistory2023

FULIMAcompressed:

FUSION LIMIT MASS — m0JSUB, related physics

—————————————————————————————————

• m0JSUB defines a universal (primary ideal spheric Dmax) limit mass where

• Gravitation force and Coulomb force

as related to the nuclear potential barrier

are in an exact ideal balancing equilibrium

about to unite by spontaneous exothermal fusion

• in the body's top mass surface nuclear region.

TrZR:

The rZ RESOLUTION 2023

The FusionLimitMass deduction (FULIMAdefinition) and its results and connections in general related cosmology IS

The rZ RESOLUTION vindicated and justified.

Especially the TwoCASES (BalanceCondition) rZ CASE2 clarifies the corresponding (primitive) idea of the atomic nucleus:

The implication is that it would have ”a uniformly distributed charge” all over its nuclear surface. That is however not the related physics case (DeducingTHErZ).

CASE2 — same end picture (above) as in DeducingTHErZ (all collected data by the so deduced [rZ]²/r relation) — as a principle toroid CASE1 morphological spouse, clarifies the advanced inner scope of the nuclear toroid nature:

THE ADVANCED INNER SCOPE OF THE TNED DEDUCED NUCLEAR TOROID NATURE

allows explanations from (»normally impossible») different views that nobody, what we know, could foresee — until they appear from a direct consequential mathematical reasoning. It is like, »Well, Henry, if you won’t dig a little deeper, you will miss the hidden gold». We are not allowed to see it — until we hit it. And when we do, it almost drowns us in causative connecting branches (mathematics discoveries). We have to take a (short) brake, first, in order to catch our breath before any further research will come into question. Foremost, a questioning one.

It all began (2007) with (FULIMA) investigating Earth’s Second Equation: a universally TNED related nuclear physical defined fusion limit mass, beginning from Dmax, classifying all other primary celestial masses in two different categories. And it ended here (Dec2023) on clarifying the initial (primitive) idea to a more generalized explaining — through ReHofstadter1956 (the rZ function) and Angeli2004 (the [rZ]²/r relation).

It should have been the job for a serious academy, long ago having found these elementary solutions paths.

— »A walk in the Park».

ShortSUMMINGCaseHistory2023:

Reader’s preference:

None of these The Atomic Nucleus (TAN) documents pertain to presentations or references or namings in any here known present academia literature or documents. Not at all (TNED). By no means. However the TAN documents and their internal linkings are based on such comparisons — as for example in (Swedish) TheLIST and (English) AllKeplerMATH (EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATIONS) — comparing modern academic mathematics-physics with related: Detailed descriptions with examples (where so possible). See also from Consequential Mathematics (COMA).

We leave no one behind.

TAN 1-4 TheAtomicNucleus series 2023 in Universe History

SHORT SUMMING CASE HISTORY 2023

Unless disclaimed:

15Jul2023: TAN1

TNED becomes fully verified through (ReHofstadter1956 ¦ Angeli2004 ¦ WholePicture ¦ plusCubeGRAPH ¦ ProtonRADIUS) DeducingTHERrZ on the explaining collected form (zR)²/r.

10Sep2023: TAN2

NeutronSquareSolutions (NS, NeutronSQUAREmath) — from the Microsoft MsWorks banning (2008) break that prohibited further development in Windows using the MsWORKS 4.0 calculus program — program cell recovery in OpenOffice finished: A full and completed OpenOfficeCalc cell code presentation is now available also on all the first mass number 1-60 atomic masses as calculated by the TNED deduced NS solutions mathematics. With these followed further comparisons (conventional Weizsäcker solutions), further clarifying the TNED solution positions.

The vindicated solutions brought further fuel to the PO4 (Quotes, phosphorylation) Earth global biological issue — on deforestation — and the Quest of a general (undeniable, or not at all) global pandemic situation.

5Oct2023: TAN3

The (CWONfromCAP ¦ TISEL ¦ LifeBiologyViolated ¦ PO4evaluation) vindications further comprised in isotopic quantities (TheNitrogenIssue) increases the arguing strength on reaching a closure of the PO4 quest (MainPurpose).

The Earth isotopic production details are exposed (EFECAP ¦ TECMINC ¦ ICE ¦ TOOR ¦ IronCORE ¦ CAPPPED and others). The primary chemical-molecular nuclear Dmax matrix structures are discussed, compared and illustrated (CLOHEM ¦ EXOhemFUSE).

6Dec2023: TAN4

PREVIOUS CONTEXT LAG (TwoCASES) IN THE (2004) ORIGINAL (Earth’s Second Equation) — in explicit illuminated on the (zR)²/r factor by the above TAN1 named and linked Angeli2004 and ReHofstadter1956 Jul2023 results — receives a revisited fresh up presentation — finally clarifying in TNED what never could be clarified without the named experimental references. This document.

RESULTS

CalCards: Kalkylkort: NOTE. OpenOffice SpreadSheet. Swedish EditionOnly

CALCARDS

PART OF THE AIM behind these open (author’s working original) available CalCards is of course

• first the availability of the proving mathematics on exact basics

• with the possibility for any interested reader to make own tests, or further, whatever

the reader may do whatever the reader may do with the content,

the original is not affected by that,

the original can always be retrieved a limitless number of times

• offering a complete open access index to the complete work behind the main text :

• we leave no one behind in related physics and mathematics, as far as we can.

——————————————————————————————————————

THE SWEDISH OPEN OFFICE CELL CODED VERSION —

we do not know how the cell code looks if opened in an English version — if at all ;

— We should have thought about that from the start [ 2008 ] — which we didn’t.

——————————————————————————————————————

Bio2024.ods

kalkylkorten nedan DIREKT FRÅN DEN HÄR WEBBLÄSAREN Bio2024.ods — se öppningsmanual om ej redan bekant — eller kopiera URL:en nedan till valfri webbläsare (vilket som fungerar — förutsatt att SVENSKA VERSIONEN av gratisprogramvaran OPEN OFFICE finns installerad på datorn)

http://www.universumshistoria.se/AaKort/Bio2024.ods

Tabell1 PHOTO SYNTHESIS synthesis — TheOne

Comparing Related with Established

Comparing Properties Methane, Carbon Dioxide, Water ¦ Engineering Toolbox, Wikipedia, NASA

Tabell2 The IPCC count ”missing sink”, comparing simple calculation in established with related

The S4 part

Tabell3 The 2009 t(AGW) temperature curve equation in cell code

FULImass2023.ods

kalkylkorten nedan DIREKT FRÅN DEN HÄR WEBBLÄSAREN FULImass2023.ods — se öppningsmanual om ej redan bekant — eller kopiera URL:en nedan till valfri webbläsare (vilket som fungerar — förutsatt att SVENSKA VERSIONEN av gratisprogramvaran OPEN OFFICE finns installerad på datorn)

http://www.universumshistoria.se/AaKort/FULImass2023.ods

Tabell1 Constants, Drafts, and their Results as exposed in this presentation.

Primary Masses Tabell 1 G8

Tabell2 ThermoGravitationalEquilibriumPressure, all our Solar system planets in comparison

CalCards

PhotoSYNTHESISsynthesis: Addition 29Oct2024 — continuing with additions from The BIOLOGICAL HiTech part in IndMagPEX2024 ¦ THE IPCC COMMUNITY’s MISSING SINK ¦ TheIPCCfraudCollected

MLN1812 : MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 — how it began, and from where ..

Passage View — from Sweden in May 2024 — towards the Atlantic Ocean ..

MARKET AND TRADE are the fundamental bloodstream domains in any human civilized culture. Instrumentation. Craftsmanship. Technological evolution. The Dawn of Civilization. Passage View towards the Atlantic Ocean.

BUT WHEN THE ESTABLISHMENTS BEGINS EATING ON ITS OWN FLESH — LIFE SUSTAINING EARTH SURFACE BIOLOGY — IT IS TIME TO RING ON THE BELL. You have a problem with that? Spring 16May2024.

PSS12 ¦ PSSoct2024 ¦ Proof12 ¦ TICMS ¦ TMS ¦ WhatMissingSINK ¦ LandUSE ¦ HowWeKnowSDconstant ¦ TheExplanation — the 37%¦

EPILOGUE ¦ AGWdetails2013 ¦ LogisticScienceREF ¦ OceanPeriods ¦ TheAGWProof ¦ AttestingWyatt2013 ¦ IPCC2006Embezzlement ¦ REVISITINGtNASAoriginal ¦ TheFRAUD ¦ TheIPCCfraudCollected

TheDRIFT ¦ ProvingTheProof ¦ The2006IPCCembezzlement ¦ GlobalEnergyUse ¦ OriginalGlobalFossilOceanSmoothed ¦ The2006MalversatedIPCCVersion ¦ The2006IPCCembezzlementRem ¦ IPCCHeatIntrusion2010

SammanfattningIPCC ¦ IPCCconsensus ¦ SummingIPCCFraud ¦ IPCCHeatIn2010Sum ¦ GrundsambandCO2Plus ¦ CO2heatCollector

HUMANRIGHT BASICS 2024 (A3) — Defense

” Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.”.

In providing public service (”The will of the people”), state administrations cannot perform any enterprise jeopardizing Earth general biological health;

— If any doubt exists, such enterprise is a hazard to humanity and all living creatures, and should so be abandoned, unless better acquainted. Disclaim.

— It was never about decision. It was always about recognition. Say again. Come again. Technology, Market, Trade: business. Care.

• Decision (dictatorship: commandment from 1 or 1 million 1, same status) has no mandate over Humanright. Defense Fundamentals.

Swedish Parliamentary Riksdag:

— You were saying?

»Emperor’s New Clothes» 2006+: Very HiQTech. MustBuyBook.

IPCC2018in2010 ¦ TheIPCCembezzlementFraud2006+ ¦ TheIPCCfraudCollected

PSS12:

HumanRight Basics

PhotoSYNTHESISsynthesis

PHOTOsynthesis SYNTHESIS Oct2024

CLARIFYING ALL THE DETAILS by further comprised descriptions continuing from the Bio part in IndMagPEX2024: IPCCversusRELATED

Related physics and mathematics — versus comparing Modern Academia on this level — is based on

1. MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 — the 1812 Atmos CO2 284ppmv IPCC preference;

— as based on geological samples and present instrumental measures (NOAA sources), its credibility should represent the best humanity can present in our time.

2. The Mauna Loa SD constant — most (Proof12) certainly not represented at all in modern academic corridors

— although the apparent weight of its profound provability:

Comparing3: PSS12

DATA SOURCES as specified below in ProvingSDconstant

Comparing three large time spread Mauna Loa SD values

year ppmv difference

——— ——— —————

1960 6.20 ±0.00 preference

1990 6.00 –0.20

2015 6.37 +0.17

——— ——— —————

mean 6.19 –0.01

Known (Anomalies) differences appear with rate of known large deforestation periods:

The negative average mean (–0.01) testifies: no significant net SD change can be concluded over the 55y sampled period. This is (conclusively) just an inside available data example.

Anomaly World deforestation period 1850-1970: forest regrowth (1960-1970): momentarily decreasing SD mean effect;

Anomaly Borneo deforestation period 1980-1990: forest decrease has momentarily increasing SD mean effect.

ProvingSDconstant:

Comparing3

Related physics and mathematics explains — on (CWON) basic 6Carbon12 (U=12) and 8Oxygen16 (U=32; U¦CO2=44):

——————————————— Gya, billion years ago — justifying the SD constant

DataSources ¦ MaunaLoaVariations ¦ TheSDconstant ¦ MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 — our IPCC-MaunaLoa Normal Nature Forest last seen preference year 1812: 284ppmvCO2: no extra.

Beginning (Sources ¦ VoJ) from first water on Earth (farthest 4.5Gya) and zero vegetation, given (CWON) TheTOTAL CO2 biogas $¦CO2 = 6.390857917 T15 KGcarbox, the vegetating process establishes a (final) balance between (MLN1812, earliest some 1.5Gya) a Standing Alive Natural Forest (S=4.05625 T15 KG CO2) with an annual cYCLIC (Leaf&Needle) c = 2.028125 T13 CO2 — leaving a Mauna Loa constant annual SD=5.8ppmvCO2=4.67 T13 KG carbox=WI (MaunaLoaProof 2017).

It is, or can so be understood to be, an AtmosBiosLitos gas basic physics pressure balance (BioEK1-10: TheTEN).

— While humanity very well can and already have changed the Atmos condition (MLN1812 284ppmvCO2, BioEK1: 1475, now [y2020] down to 1254), humanity is what we know in no position to also change the Earth crust carbon element compositions (BioEK3: 1460).

— Meaning, in time: It will heal — provided the state governments allow a full regrowth: no more deforestation industry on Earth. Full regrowth (at least 200y). With today’s academic and governmental innovative aces, that will happen, maybe, next ice age.

Shorter: as on the graveyard: nobody survived. Modern academic consensus ideas on cosmology is killing life on Earth — by drift. Not plan. Disclaim.

VoJ ¦ CAP ¦ CWON ¦ Equivalent Primitive Carbon Matrices ¦ GlucoseSTCE ¦ Starch ¦ AminoACIDexampleMatrices ¦ MeteoritePROOF ¦ IRONcore ¦ WhyNotModernAcademy? ¦ TheATOMICnucleus

Not represented in modern academy — related physics and mathematics.

— As explained in CWON from CAP, all celestial bodies (after the K-cell detonation) develop a specific primary surface neutron matrix morphology. By principle, all celestial bodies develop water and biochemical neutron-structure matrices on their surfaces. All meteorites expose these characteristic physical domains (general ICE in comets), even down to testified and observed pollen structures, including (many) amino acid building blocks. These observations have become the most powerful general cosmological proof in supporting the (UH) related physics and mathematics: the deduced results — contrary to and compared with results from modern quarters (computer modeling academic consensus: »transistor cosmos» intelligence: all atoms safely excluded).

From K-CELL detonation

AllKeplerMath ¦ IRONcore ¦ StarPHYSICS 1 ¦ StarPHYSICS 2 ¦ GalacticFORMATION ¦ SolarSystems in Milky Way

No SD observable change:

♦ ProvingSDconstant: There is, what we know here, from the available (NOAA) Mauna Loa Data no observable or measurable systematic change in the SD-quantity. How is that?

HOW DO WE KNOW SD constant 5.8ppmvCO2?

Related physics and mathematics description — not present in modern academy:

Not in the MLN 1812 Forest, and not after either. Its constancy can be explained and managed by a gas pressure equilibrium (CO2 solubility in water for plant growth by photosynthesis: BioEK4). It is based on a deducible (CWON) general precise Earth AtmosBiosLitos composition of elements (1900s geologically collected data). Humans can change, and already have, the Atmos property in some ways. Yes. But not the Earth crust composition as such, what we know. (Business enterprise would, if it could .. HiTech).

Affecting the Atmos part, also affects human life and its biology. So, it is implied here, that Nature, in time, WILL drive the intruder »out of the system».

— Funny it is though, that the present 2024 Earth human state governmental personnel itself apparently can not conclude the defense basics from within.

The stated SD constant average 5.8 ppmvCO2 here in UH is based on all the (2016) 57y available Mauna Loa data 1959-2016 (SCRIPPS, CDIAC) as accounted for in RefValues2017.

Continue in TICMS

THE IPCC COMMUNITY’s MISSING SINK

PhotoSYNTHESISsynthesis ¦ MLN1812 ¦ PSS12 ¦ Comparing3 ¦ ProvingSDconstant

PSSoct2024: Glucose6566Issue:

Related physics and mathematics:

Comparing established with related — »preferentially knowing the How to why to stop on red light»:

Thoughtco.com: (7Nov2024)

” Photosynthesis .. Equation .. Here is the equation for the overall reaction:

6 CO₂ + 6 H₂O → C₆H₁₂O₆ + 6 O₂ .. light is required ..

”.

Related physics and mathematics:

COMPARE:

Cellulose, Starch ¦ Leaf&Needle emission

6 CO₂ + 6 H₂O → C₆H₁₀O₅ + 1O₂ + 5 O₂ + 1H₂O .. light is required ..

ground supplement to close the cyclic reaction:

; + 1H₂O + 1C + 1O₂ + 5C+ 4H₂O + 5 O₂ + 1H₂O = »recycling marker reached» .. = 6H₂O + 6C + 6O₂ ;

6 CO₂ + 6 H₂O → .. recycled, continue

Related:

The Leaf&Needle uptaking 6 CO₂ + 6 H₂O comes from

1 part ground recycling element block (with additional elements, not written out here)

; + 1H₂O + 1C + 1O₂ + 5C+ 4H₂O + 5 O₂ + 1H₂O

where the end 5O2+1H2O is emitted from the Leaf&Needle as a waste product from the GLUCOSE production (Starch and Cellulose),

and the other two blocks associates with THE ONE SINGLE CIRCULATING MaunaLoa 1O₂ SDtransported oxygen Agent, fulfilling the missing

1 part additional, but not yet quite filled, ground block

; + 1H₂O + 1C + 1O₂ + 5C+ 4H₂O

these two forming a new full glucose (Cellulose, Starch: C₆H₁₀O₅ ) producing cyclic base material for further production as the named

6 CO₂ + 6 H₂O

— As we see:— Established ides of photosynthesis leaves out what it does not understand; the single SDtransported oxygen O2 Agent;

— »Plants produce oxygen by splitting water», modern academia says;

— RELATED PHYSICS: plants circulate oxygen (DOLE1965), never split water.

— Again: Return to IPCCversusRelated ¦ RelatedPhotoSynthesis and see how Lucky we are

— You were saying?

— Funny that the modern academia educated humanity in general at all understand to stop on red light.

— The 1O₂ never takes part in the actual plant mass growth as such, only act as a repeatedly transporting ground Carbon 1C associate to complete the fabric. After repeatedly having left the Leaf, the 1O₂ each time associates with a new old plant decayed 1C in water 1H₂O, making the one missing CO₂ + 1H₂O carbonic acid H₂CO₃ for completing the chain

— Modern academia does not (still 2024) understand the photosynthesis process. Not even close. Now, tell me I’m a liar.

Maybe some reminding words of wisdom from Ruben 1941, one of the pioneers:

”.. and also that very little is known about the actual mechanism.”. Ruben 1941.

So: In this above reflected sense, the term ”glucose” has »compromising issues». Or perhaps is a »corrupted term», depending on preferences.

RELATED: the 6 CO₂ + 6 H₂O material produces 6 CO₂ + 5 H₂O because also Leaf&&Needle emits one water molecule of the given 6.

— And if the Leaf emits one 1H2O, the remaining 5H2O defines the product, not the six.

En snabb sökkoll Nov2024 @Internet upplyser (»do plants evaporate water?») ..

Yes, they indeed do — »water gushes out»:

” Transpiration is the loss of water from the plant through evaporation at the leaf surface.”. several sources repeat the same sentence.

” As temperatures rise. water evaporates out of the leaves more readily.” ..

And there are many other sources testifying the same order of business.

It is The six that defines the production, not the product. The photosynthesis Leaf&Needle glucose product has only 5H2O. Cellulose and Starch. Not 6 (the sugar some put in coffee and tea).

That also means, seen from the related unless we did miss something, that the established source on the Equation is corrupted compromised: it does not explain the Process.

AGAIN:

Now, if this is as bad as it seems — »the Glucose Term Issue» — we apparently do not have much else to fetch from established sources. In this production we will continue to refer the Leaf&Needle production of Cellulose and Starch by the multi block assemblage single Related GLUCOSE molecule 6 C + 5 H2O (sometimes named ”anhydroglucose”) in modern corridors. In case of difficulties, we will refer to this UH article PSSoct2024 and its references For eventually further.

PRIMARY GLUCOSE MATRIX — one of several different possible neutron plane filling formations — primary biochemical neutron- atom matrices

— as suggested by source in meteorites — see the general CARBON MATRICES in UH

6C12 8O16 1H1 — how atoms compose spontaneously, basic neutron matrix morphology »nuclear rings»

NOTE: In modern academic established corridors there is not, what we know here, even the slightest theory of HOW type amino acid stuff — and even pollen — have ended up as found in Meteorites. And even less, how the same stuff ended up here, on Earth — you were saying?

However — consequential mathematics — our universe certainly has the answers. The only missing agent: someone willing to dig.

Compare on CAP (»modern academy 1800+ student’s prison»). Modern academy has, somehow, ended up to be last in the class. Correct if found wrong.

If not, it is time for humanity to be released from its long time prison of (1800+ modern academia preached) cosmic ignorance: Box. Dark. Drift. Humanright recognition..The only existing Knowledge domain: gravitation, electricity — light, heat, magnetism: LIFE. The Periodic System. We . US. HUMANS. All sciences. Disclaim.

Claim whatever you want, in any way you want it, at any available time.

MidSWDEN 19May2024. I will say no more.

STILL SOM PLACES TO VISIT IN OLD MAGIC BEAUTIFUL SWEDEN — fast decreasing in number 2024.

— Unless we did miss something:

Trees. plants. grow by (cellulose. starch; polysaccharide morphology)

6 C + 5 H2O.

Not by

6 C + 6 H2O — witholding 1 water molecule. not letting it out from the Leaf&Needle;

Leaf&Needle evaporate water (1 of the six taken up by the plant).

— It is not clarified in established (Wikipedia) references.

.. + other elements needed ..

The 6566 issue — Glucose6566Issue

CLARIFYING THE TWO very DIFFERENT

6 C + 5 H2O cellulose ¦ starch (here in UH glucose atomic composition, THAT sugar which builds: C₆H₁₀O₅) and

IN RELATED TERMS: THE BUILDING BLOCK forming Cellulose and Starch — same glucose block but molecularly arranged in different ways — straight versus circular/spiral;

ITS ESTABLISHED TERM IS anhydroglucose AND, as related, Cellulose and Starch — versus

6 C + 6 H2O »the modern academia dry Leaf&Needle version» — termed glucose (monosaccharide) NOT Leaf&Needle produced ..

” Glucose is a sugar with the molecular formula C₆H₁₂O₆”, Nov2024 — and all other following found hits on the search claim the same formula ..

Related physics and mathematics versus modern academia (1800+) on

PHOTOsynthesis SYNTHESIS Oct2024

Wikipedia. Glucose 28Oct2024:

” Glucose is a sugar with the molecular formula C6 H12 O6”. =

6 C + 6 H2O. Not

6 C + 5 H2O. Wikipedia reference has one extra water moilecule.

Wikipediaartiklen visar dock en delvis (molekylärt) sammansatt form (”Fisher projection of D-glucose”) med just centralformen

6 C + 5 H2O .. (med tillägg på molekylens ändar).

— Om vi pratar CYKLISK fotosyntes (en enda central molekyl-socker-form). verkar det INTE finnas något etablerat beskrivbart ..

Den relatertade bilden som visar att Lövet&Barret ger ut 5 O2 + 1 H2O skulle enligt Wikipedias referens bli (vi tar bort 1 H2O och lägger den till de andra 5)

5 O2 + 0 H2O:

— »Lövet¦Barret ger inte ut vatten i NETTO. Tar enbart upp vatten». Stämmer det i praktiken?

— Lövet¦Barret tar inte upp 5 delar vatten och ger ut 1 del vatten. utan tar helt enkelt upp alla 6 delar vatten. säger Wikipediacitatet .. eller?

En snabb sökkoll på Internet upplyser (»do plants evaporate water?») ..

” Transpiration is the loss of water from the plant through evaporation at the leaf surface.”. several sources repeat the same sentence.

” As temperatures rise. water evaporates out of the leaves mor readily.” ..

And there are many other sources testifying the same order of business.

— No. The Wikipedia glucose chemical rank form is not accurate.

— Everybody uses it, though ..

100% recycled. Nothing is added. Nothing is removed. Not one single atom.

No academic filling up. No academic removing down. No academic consensus. No invented ideas of cosmos. Only deduced details from observations and mathematics (AllKeplerMath).

RELATED 100% CYCLIC PHOTOSYNTHESIS — IN NATUREFOREST LAST SEEN 1812:

TheTOTAL ¦ TheCOMPLETE ¦ IPCCdeforestation — CarbonSINK

There is, apparently, an Earth Natural Forest (last seen MLN1812) intended to provide safe biological health. However, apparently, having been more or less completely vandalized (2024) — by modern academia consensus — by drift. Not plan: who equipped the Vandals with their tools? Test answer: Modern Academic — not Nature —Teaching and education.

— Not one word Humanright recognition. Not a sound. Not a spell. ”.. to the end that every individual and every organ of society ..”. Dead silent.

Do disclaim if found faulty. Completely explainable down to the last atom.

NATURE — human educated on True Science: CARE — don’t do this.

No mother god loving way. MidSWEDEN 19May2024. Mile in. Mile out. Shockingly Increased Deforestation year after year. Almost like some type of National Panic. All over the place.

State Government: still no domestic information. It is just cut.

6 C + 5 H2O it is, as related unless disclaimed.

Proof: Leaf&Needle evaporates (1/6 of the root uptaken) water.

— We find the correct(ed) Wikipedia form

6 C + 5 H2O

in CELLULOSE (Sw. cellulosa). termed ”polysaccharide” as the Wikipedia written

C6 H10 O5 =

6 C + 5 H2O. That is our TREE STUFF (cellulose and starch. same molecule block. but arranged differently). We (but not Wikipedia) name it here (generalized) as GLUCOSE — the actual Leaf&Needle Fabric. that on which the Tree grows physically by mass.

— Wikipedia writes the Starch chemical form as (n marks a repetion)

(C6 H10 O5)n — also termed a polysaccharide in the article —

on the Starch article in the Properties column.

Cellulose have straight extension (fiber). while starch have a circular/spiral form (pure. as powder) (FM1975s364).

— Neutronmatrisernas atombildningsblock i TNED för Glukos (Cellulosa och Stärkelse). se

CheopsRektangelVe.htm#Glukosmatriser ¦ CheopsRektangelVe.htm#GlukosSTCE.

CoARTPSS24:

PSSoct2024

COLLECTED ARTICLES AND SECTIONS IN UH ON PHOTOSYNTHESIS 2014 - 2024

A[1]photosynthesis|*.htm ¦ Found: 24 ¦ 28Oct2024¦@time¦18:19:14

UHdocNo

———

159: zStatNaturPaus2014.htm 091 TräddödenWebben

— omfattande citatblock. konkluderar enbart negativa CO2+ effekter.

161: zStatNaturPaus201516.htm 105 CitatBakgr2015 ¦ TTE — Citat ¦ Fotosyntesen — underliga kemiled citeras .. Glukos .. Cellulosa Stärkelse ..

— spridda citat. Verkar omöjligt att — i etablerad litteratur — få fram klartext .. kemiledet. fotosyntesen .. virriga uppgifter ..

163: zStatNaturPaus201516b.htm 107 FörklaringenUpphittad — ”IN SEARCH OF THE MISSING CARBON SINK” ¦ CitatMS — IPCC missar Havsupptaget

— 2 spridda citat;

” For about 25 years. scientists have been uncertain as to how the global carbon cycle is balanced.”. 1995.

” For more than three decades. the attention of biologists and ecologists studying the global carbon cycle has focused on an apparent imbalance in the carbon budget. The so-called “missing sink” is a result of the following equation:

Atmospheric CO2 Increase = Human Emissions + Land Use – Ocean Uptake”. 2012.

UH — #CitatMS — ger en uttömmande helhetsförklaring. se de internt länkade avsnitten:

:

I AGW-beviset ingår ”the missing sink” [Havet spelar huvudrollen] som det nödvändiga havsupptaget för att verkställa AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming). Men IPCC-samfundet ser differensen som ett fenomen [IPCC-citat] med hav och skog som absorberar fossilindustrins förorening — och därmed dämpar en annars mera påtaglig global uppvärmning.

— Hur AGW-beviset för sin del styrker sin bevisföring redovisas detaljerat i NASA-CRU-kurvans synkronisering med Fossilindustrins koldump.

:

165: zStatNaturPaus201516d.htm 109 SkogsMarkLuftFältet — upp till 1000 ppmv i naturskog nära marken. Lüttge 2013 ¦ BioScience2010

— quotations from established sources. IPCC global numbers (GPP);

” Plants exchange carbon with the atmosphere .. through photosynthesis”. Hampshire universisty 2008.

166: zStatNaturPaus201617a.htm 120 MACbkNjmfR — Jämförande resultatbild ¦ MLBfs — ”We were witnessing ..” ¦

FigureSD ¦ NFMLPPS — NatureForestMaunaLoaProofPhotoSynthesis

— IPCC-budgeten. citat;

”The oxygen produced during photosynthesis comes from water”. Ruben1941.

167: zStatNaturPaus201617b.htm 121 MLsdMACsd — Modern akademis MLsd ..

— 33 photosynthesis citat med referenser och jämförelser.

168: zStatNaturPaus201617c.htm 122 O18 — Ruben1941 .. ¦ Examination .. — Lönnlövet Jul2017

— 48 photosynthesis citat med referenser och jämförelser .. ” .. net reaction for green plant ..”

”.. and also that very little is known about the actual mechanism.”. Ruben 1941.

21: CheopsAT.htm 140 # — no quotations. only related physics term to other sections

— no quotations. no particular presentations.

122: TNEDa1.htm 145 Fysikgrunderna

— Only 1 photosynthesis:

”Before photosynthesis evolved. Earth’s atmosphere had no free oxygen (O2).”. WIKIPEDIA Geological history of oxygen (19Jul2020).

Compare (impossible to conclude in modern academia):

Before first water on Earth’s surface. Earth’s atmosphere had no free (atmospheric) oxygen (O2). See details in VoJ.

124: TNEDa3.htm 148 FotoSynt ¦ BioEK6 ¦ PSR ¦ SDtransport ..

— 6 photosynthesis: 2 DOLE1965 quotes.; The BioSCIENCE source gives partial credit to the TNED deduced stand ..

171: zStatNaturPaus202020.htm 149 MACoIssue

— Only 1 photosynthesis: same as above. ”Before ..”.

172: zStatNaturPaus202020a.htm 150 Centralen — utförligt med SDhjulet ¦ CentEXfrk — GLUKOS kemiledet relaterat i jämförelse

— 9 photosynthesis: Citatet med 2000 år förnyat syre ..

35: CheopsRektangelV.htm 151 CerTEN — ConBEAT connections

— 14 photosynthesis: no quotes. only referring further.

36: CheopsRektangelVa.htm 152 OxyQUEST

— Only 1 photosynthesis: just a mentioning.

38: CheopsRektangelVc.htm 154 KMA

— Only 1 photosynthesis: just a mentioning;

”TNED PHYSICS CONNECTS PRIMARY BIOCHEMISTRY COSMOLOGICAL ISSUES”.

39: CheopsRektangelVd.htm 155 TheTOTAL — the most comprehensible and detailed explaining on The Bios Gas. Jan2021

— 9 photosynthesis: But no quotations. Just referring. Jan2021.

41: EarthMass.htm 157 EarthMass

— 4 photosynthesis: But no quotations. just referring (CWON from CAP). Dec2021.

144: zGMR2022.htm 158 WhatPush ¦ SDtransporter ¦ ExpoCO2 ¦ StateAttracks ¦ RespondingNature ¦ GlobalWATCHERS ¦ IPCCTNED ..

— 16 photosynthesis: But no quotations. just referring.

There is nothing such as a ”carbon sink”; references to CWON from CAP;

zStatNaturPaus201617c.htm#Koroidov2014 — det experimentella referensutdraget från Koroidov 2014

145: zGMR2023.htm 159 PSrel ¦ SDandCWON

— 5 photosynthesis: But no quotations. just referring; CWON from CAP.

8: AtomicNucleus2023II.htm 161 QUOTES

— Only 1 photosynthesis: QUOTES block on phosphorylation (PO4 — general cell division)

9: AtomicNucleus2023III.htm 162 IPCCversRP ¦ MainPurposeIllustrated ¦ LifeBiologyViolated ¦ GrowthCarbon

— 7 photosynthesis: 4 Quotations.

62: IndMagPEX2024.htm 164 IPCCversusRelated ¦ RelatedPhotoSynthesis ¦ RelPhotoSynthDetails ¦ TheSDtransporter ¦ TheSDconstant ¦ TheSDconstantHOW ..

— 13 photosynthesis: But no quotations. just referring.

This present general comprehensive background (compiled for UH 28Oct2024).

———

xxx. UH htm-document numbers in chronological order (@Internet from Aug2008).

First preparation 2002 (Windpws XP; Windows Search Engine develops in DELPHI4): Physics 7 Principles.

UniverseHistory @Internet first Aug2008

PSSoct2024 ¦ Glucose6566Issue ¦ CoARTPSS24

Proof12:

THE ACTUAL PHOTOSYNTHESIS CHEMICAL — CYCLIC — EQUATION

PSSoct2024 — the 6566issue

Related physics clarifications on Photosynthesis by comparing modern academic established

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RELATED AND IPCC

— 1. The One.

— You were saying? COMPARE (again, modern academy corridirs):

TheTOTAL ¦ TheCOMPLETE

Related photosynthesis in UniverseHistory — the Glucose fabric: Cellulose and Starch 6C + 5 H2O:

Bio2024.ods — Tabell1

IN ORDER to repeat the cycle from the RELATED GLUCOSE OUT 5 O2 + 1 H2O, an additional ground 5C + 4 H2O — making 5 [ CO2 + H2O ] — is requested — plus a final Leaf&Needle not mass but TRANSPORTING associated O2 [SD-cyclic] + C [ old plant decay] — on one remaining ground water molecyle H2O — making the complete cyclic 6 [CO2 + H2O] again. Nature Forest Preferences latest 1812. MaunaLoaProof says it all. But modern academia has not its preference.

— Why not?

— Again: Return to IPCCversusRelated ¦ RelatedPhotoSynthesis and see how Lucky we are

— Why not, you were saying?

100% recycled. Nothing is added. Nothing is removed. Not one single atom.

No academic filling up. No academic removing down.

.. + other elements needed ..

In modern corridors the Mauna Loa Proof is unknown — besides that it is not very welcome (MAC becomes shredded then). That is:

WhatMissingSINK

— Remove [ 1 ] The Red 1 (The Mauna Loa constant SD Wheel cyclic) — and we have the complete Modern Academia Modern revised Kant-Laplace Nebular Hypothesis Einstein Cosmological c Principle Universe Solved on its already eye exposed HiTech manner. Safely.

Modern Academy:

— You were saying?

CWON from CAP. All celestial bodies develop on the exact same basic physical principle. It is only their different masses that decide their future fate. By detailed Atomic Production. All based on The Planck Constant: The Neutron.

Modern Academy:

— You were saying?

(It associates to the DVD movie LARA CROFT I. and her Sand Grain. solving all enigmatic Huge to a One single).

Eternal Pulse.

— Modern photosynthesis is all about a fit to general consensus on most popular ideas of cosmology. Disclaim.

— Related physics photosynthesis is all about a question of balance and equilibrium: least possible energy to accomplish highest possible degree of perfection (The Woman — the luxury version of Man. Say again: »You’re The Man»).

Plocka bort den (O2 [ 1 ]) ständigt cirkulerande Mauna Loa SD konstanten ur bilden. Resultat 1: Fotosyntesen produceras syre. Konsekvens: Men varifrån får då Blad&Barr sin felande sjätte kolatom? Svar. Resultat 2: C+O2 = CO2 — som modern akademi självklart associerar med Mauna Loa:s CO2 SD domän (The1958Fatal). Färdigt: Blad&Barr tar upp kol ur luften (som kommer från Maula Loa SD:s CO2. särskilt under sommarhalvåret). Den O2-delen. menar modern akademi. får förstås som uppkommen genom vattensönderdelning (via två vattenmolekyler. + elektronutbyten med normaliseringar. som det framställs: 2 H2O till H2 + O2): fotosyntesen sönderdelar vatten. Klart. Jordens atmosfäriska syre produceras av växterna. Och så var det inget mera med den saken.

Proof12

TICMS:

WhatMissingSINK

AGW (global warming) stuff:

IPCC samfundets myntade begrepp ”den felande kolsänkan”

THE IPCC COMMUNITY:s MISSING SINK

I det etablerade samfundets (IPCCcitat) beskrivning av vårt atmosfäriska CO2 komplex finns 14 förekomster med ”model” i de olika engelsktextade citatdelarna i originaldokumentet från 2015.

Simplified .. I AGW-beviset (2010) ingår ”the missing sink” (Havet spelar huvudrollen) som det nödvändiga havsupptaget för att verkställa AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming). Men IPCC-samfundet ser differensen som ett fenomen (IPCC-citat) med hav och skog som absorberar fossilindustrins förorening — och därmed dämpar en annars mera påtaglig global uppvärmning. — Hur AGW-beviset för sin del styrker sin bevisföring redovisas detaljerat i NASA-CRU-kurvans synkronisering med Fossilindustrins koldump. ———————————————————— S source, as S2 below in TMS M source, as S3 belkow in TMS

” For the 1990′s, ocean models and a variety of data-based approaches suggest that the ocean sink was 2.2+-0.4 PgC/yr”; ” “Our statistical model is not able to predict the future development,” says Landschützer, “so it is very critical to continue measuring the surface ocean CO2 concentrations in the Southern Ocean. “This is particularly important since current models are not able to reproduce the observed variations”, adds Gruber.”; ” A model of terrestrial biosphere response to land-use change and atmospherig CO2”; ” Vegetation growth is modeled as the difference between net primary production (NPP) and mortality. NPP, the net flux of carbon from atmosphere to vegetation, is a logistic function of vegetation carbon density. The response of NPP to atmospheric CO2 is modeled with three response functions: a logarithmic, a rectangular-hyperbolic, and a response function derived from a biochemical model of C3 photosynthesis.”; ” The differences between the estimates by deconvolution and those from the land-use emissions models represent an imbalance in the global carbon budget, a ”missing sink”. Estimates of the missing sink for the decade 1980-1989 are as high as 1.6±1.4 Gt yr–1 (Houghton et al., 1990; 1992). A variety of hypotheses have been suggested ..”; ” Results We initialized the model for 1700 C.E. with an assumed equilibrium global carbon concentration of 276.8 ppmv”; ” The flux history is an expression of the hypothesis that CO2 enhancement of NPP explains the missing carbon sink. Direct measurements of the flux are not possible, but we can test the hypothesis with model results.”; ” For about 25 years, scientists have been uncertain as to how the global carbon cycle is balanced. Analyses based on models of oceanic uptake have consistently required a terrestrial sink for carbon (Bacastow and Keeling, 1973; Broecker et al., 1979; Keeling et al., 1989, Sarmiento et al., 1992), and more recently models of atmospheric trans- port using atmospheric CO2 data suggest large terrestrial sinks in middle latitudes of the northern hemisphere (Tans et al., 1990, Ciais et al., 1995).”; ” The basic statistical model into which the data are assimilated describes R, the rate of growth of atmospheric CO2, as a function of a time varying airborne fraction (f0 + s [1] t) times fossil-fuel (F) plus land use (L) emissions plus two linear factors depending on Nin˜o-3 SST anomalies (N) and volcanic aerosol index ..”; ” The simplest model of the atmospheric growth rate is one of a constant AF and yields f = 0.43 when fitted to all data.”.

I den (TNED) relaterade beskrivningen av ämnet finns ingenting sådant: ingen ”model”. Bevisning och resultat ligger helt på observationer i., från och av redan välkända atmosfäriska mätningar av temperaturer och halter, och hur dessa förhåller sig till varandra. Inget annat.

”The missing sink” i den etablerade klimatpanelens (IPCC) begrepp är (förenklat) differensen S(fossilt emitterat CO2-kol) minus M (atmosfäriskt uppmätt CO2-kol, förutsatt noll CO2 atmosfärisk inverkan från avskogning). Som det framställs i TheResilientEARTH citatet (2012) — ”But .. the equation does not balance” — vill den etablerade föreställningen att uppmätt atmosfäriskt CO2-kol (M) borde vara lika med emitterat fossilt (S) CO2-kol.

— Det fungerar inte så. Milt sagt, inte alls över huvud taget så (TheAGWproof). Havet, inte luften, spelar huvudrollen.

Det faktum att så inte är fallet har myntat den (2015) etablerade termen ”the missing sink”, »den felande kolsänkan»:

— Varför avspeglas inte allt fossilt emitterat (S) i allt atmosfäriskt uppmätt (M)?

Relaterad fysik och matematik svarar — men ingen sådan fason finns i etablerade korridorer:

— Därför ATT S–M CO2:et skapade den globala uppvärmningen (AGW) genom att den fossila förbränningsenergin leds ut till och tas upp av haven. Inte luften.

Relaterad fysik och matematik — rätta gärna om fel, kort sammandrag:

Den marktunga (U=44) CO2-gasen från industrifossilförbränningarna (markgastrycket växer ..), differensen S–M, letade sig landvägen direkt ut i haven från kontinenterna. Det skapade den globala uppvärmningen (AGW). Men det etablerade (IPCC) synsättet kopplar inte den bilden. Etablerat vill tydligen istället mena att S–M CO2 fossilbrännet spelar en mera passiv roll genom att tas upp av Blad&Barr (IPCC samfundets term ”kolsänka”: ännu mera naturmord). Därmed, menar man, dämpas en annars (betydligt ”LUCKILY”) större global uppvärmningseffekt.

Genom, de simuleringsmodeller man använder (citatet i TheResilientEARTH) får man i slutänden också fram en andel havsabsorberande CO2-koldel. Se den jämförande tabellen i IPCC-räkningen.

Den så etablerade internationella stadfästningen av begreppet ”kolsänka” har så (Kyotoavtalet) etablerad en mera vidsynt och liberal omfattning på begreppet miljömord: ännu mer nersågning av levande — för att bereda plats för uppväxande IPCC-lydiga Blad&Barr att dränera atmosfären på fossilt CO2.

Ännu inte en prick av synbarhet av minskande avtagande atmosfäriskt CO2 överskott (NOAA-citatet 2024, senaste Högsta —igen). Ökningen enbart ökar.

The already increasing CO2 excess just keeps seeing new heights. MidSWEDEN May2024. Mile in. Mile out. IPCC samfundet måste ha mera naturmord. Kyotoavtalet. Trädåkrar.

The less alive sun light uptaking Leaf&Needle energy, the higher stress on life sustaining defense. Disclaim. State kills nature.

— Again: Return to IPCCversusRelated ¦ RelatedPhotoSynthesis and see how Lucky we are

— You were saying?

HOW DO WE KNOW SD constant 5.8ppmvCO2?

THE IPCC COMMUNITY:s MISSING SINK

Relaterad fysik och matematik beskriver den moderna korrumperade akademins feluppfattningar av Jordbiosfärens biologi — rätta gärna om fel:

Den moderna akademins fatala etablerade samstämmighetsidé om ”carbon sink”:

TMS: TICMS

TheMISSINGsink ¦ IPCCscienceCommunity — where Missing Sink? — 2015 ¦ Quotations ¦

S2 INDUSTRIAL: AM2015A.ods — Tabell2 Column C with diagram — INDUSTRIAL SOURCES CDIAC 2015

S3 MaunaLoa: AGWods — 2010, Tabell2 Column B: US SOUTH POLE RESEARCH 2015, South Pole Concentration SPC; S3 is formated SPC¦CO2 — [ MLN1812=284ppmvCO2 + [SD/2 = 5.8ppmvCO2/2] ] × 2.2 T12 KGcarbon/ppmvCO2

— alternatively [ slightly different values ]

S3 MaunaLoa: AM2015b.ods — 2015, TabellML Column B with diagram

S4 equation in zStatNaturPaus201516b.htm#S4 ¦ Also in AGWods — 2010, Tabell1 — yearINPUT calculates annual T9 KG industrial FossilCarbon emission [From 2009 deduced NASA temperature curve]:

ideal (smoothed) Annual T9 KG FossilCarbon emissions from 1815 = 1.765*(1 - 1/(1 + ((year - 1815)/212.7)^4))*10170.94 — detailed from the 2009 TNED deduced NASA smoothed t(AGW)Function;

— That function’s individual values must be summed over the entire period as accumulated annual emissions.

— Its accumulated value 2011 ends on 3.73849 T14 KG carbon12, the same as the global statistically accounted 3.73729 T14 tabled value. So these two can readily be compared on a fair approximated precision scale.

— The S4 functional mathematics as such has, what we know, no modern quarter representation, while the statistics as in S2 are better known.

IPCC2018in2010 ¦ TheIPCCembezzlementFraud2006+ ¦ TheIPCCfraudCollected

The Missing Sink Issue

WHAT DOES The Modern Academia Earth IPCC ACES MEAN BY ”the missing sink” — S2 minus S3 — ? Related Physics and Mathematics explains: never was one.

S2 and S3 are part of the modern academia (IPCC) accountings. However (related physics AGW-proof 2009-2010), not the S4 part. IPCC and associated does not associate the fossil global warming effect (TheAGWProof) with the fossil combustion energy account (the simple t/T math).

— What we know: The IPCC community does not relate the fossil combusted CO2 waste, the air heaviest atmospheric gas, U=44, with a shortest fastest Ground Highway path directly into The Oceans (the simple t/T math). No sir. IPCC community doesn’t. Not even close. No way.

— The global warming phenomena has not that type of explanation, according to the scientific IPCC community stand (Arrhenius Climate Mathematics). Explicitly clarified from 2006, publicly announced some 2017 (after »The IPCC PANIC» 2013: AttestingWYATT2013): A New Temperature Map is published globally.

— IPCC instead took the stand that »all industrial fossil CO2 waste Should reflect on the Mauna Loa content». As seen (S2–S3): It didn’t. It doesn’t. No way. Not even close. Related: the AGW effect is defined by an ocean heat uptake — after which part of the chimney emitted CO2 begins to recycle on land-marine-atmosphere. It is a pollution mathematical issue (hyperbola math). Not a climate issue (logarithmic math).

— The Arrhenius mathematics does not apply to the AGW effect — although in certain regions lying (very) close, as proven in detail.

— Because IF it would as IPCC wants it, the oceans would NOT have been able to absorb the fossil combusted energy combustion temperature (T) waste into the oceans. Now, as things are (Nov2024), the IPCC community has not this idea of the complex: The IPCC Created idea of a ”missing sink” is a fatal misunderstanding — related physics and mathematics says. There never was any a missing component — except in the real world Mind of modern academia. Disclaim, anyone who can.

TheIPCCembezzlementFraud2006+ ¦ TheIPCCfraudCollected — The IPCCcommunity did never check on the energy source: IPCC introduces, by drift, not plan, a breach — a fraud — on it from 2006.

— Why is that .. is there an explanation in there?

We already know that measuring the (increased) CO2 content in the oceans is associated with large (organizational) problems: Too few shipping measuring crews on to much ocean.

WhatMissingSINK: TMS

Related physics and mathematics

WHAT MEANS THE IPCC COMMUNITY ”missing sink”?

I AGW-beviset ingår ”the missing sink” [Havet spelar huvudrollen] som det nödvändiga havsupptaget för att verkställa AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming). Men IPCC-samfundet ser differensen som ett fenomen [IPCC-citat] med hav och skog som absorberar fossilindustrins förorening — och därmed dämpar en annars mera påtaglig global uppvärmning (LUCKILY). Hur AGW-beviset för sin del styrker sin bevisföring redovisas detaljerat i NASA-CRU-kurvans synkronisering med Fossilindustrins koldump (TheAGWproof). Bevisningen ges fullständigt — med IPCC övertramp från 2006 i TheIPCCfraudCollected. IPCC samfundets trovärdighet blir — alltså — starkt ifrågasatt — om ingen kan dementera; IPCC accepterar (utan att veta om det också) AGW-bevisets statistiska globala energianvändning (GlobalEnergyUse) från 1850 — men bara upp till år 2006. Därifrån, menar IPCC (tydligen fortfarande helt ovetande om sammanhangen, om ingen annan förklaring finns), att det är deras nya riktlinjer som gäller — utan att säga något alls, utom att diktera, visa upp, en Ny Karta (CRUuea2017), en Ny Påramp, för den egna legenden, eller vad det ska föreställa. IPCC hanteringen av matematiken bevisas detaljerat vara milt sagt sullig.

Här gör vi en generalgenomgång av alla detaljer — eftersom hela saken numera Nov2024 är fullständigt genomlyst. Rätta gärna om fel. Sakfel får inte förekomma här..

IPCC2018in2010 ¦ TheIPCCembezzlementFraud2006+ ¦ TheIPCCfraudCollected

Quoted Source 2012 ¦ Click Nov2024 on the 2015 sampled URL leads to the information: Sorry, you have been blocked You are unable to access xn ..

Previous free and open public Science information becomes increasingly access denied @Internet — demanding Interest Registration.

— Internet Fascism is spreading .. spying on individuals .. no humanright recognition mentioning ..

That web site has the URL https://www.xn--kaytol-r9a.com/ with no available information, even that is blocked ..

— The 2015 already quoted passage has other sources confirming the same essence, further quoted below.

In the section LandUSE below, the TELLUS (1995) quoted source uses the same ”from land use” value 2.2 in ”2.2±0.4” T12 KG carbon, as do ”a variety of data-based approaches”.

— The King1994 source uses a value lowest 0.2 highest 3 T12 KG carbon for ”the missing sink” as 1.6±0.4 T12 KG Carbon per year during the 1980s;

King1994

— Excuse me: The difference, you say, is no difference. It has arisen as an effect from a misapprehended idea of ”estimates by deconvolution”, lacking a fundamental understanding of the entire complex — as well as in the idea of ”land-use emissions”.

— Again: Return to IPCCversusRelated ¦ RelatedPhotoSynthesis and see how Lucky we are

Shorter:

There is nothing such as an atmospheric carbon sink

— IN PLANTS.

Plants have their own (forest) water cyclic CO2.

Modern academia does not understand the biological complex.

IPCCcount: WhatMissingSINK

TheResilientEARTH source states a missing ”2.9” T12 KG carbon value. That source’s values as cited above is given in the below comparing OpenOffice (Swedish version) table. Of the other (2015) quoted missing link sources, no other than the above have values.

Bio2024.ods — Tabell2

FOLLOWING THE RESILIENT EARTH SIMPLE CHECKINGRHETORIC RANK

Atmospheric CO2 Increase = FossilEmission + Deforestation — OceanUptake:

The first part (IPCC) have the quoted values from the 2012 TheResilientEarth source:

The IPCC reference is as quoted in the TheResilientEARTH source.

The Related comparing result:

The (CDIAC) related CfromFossil values sources are specified in S2.

Accumulated Carbon emissions in T12 KG period 1815 - 2011

The MaunaLoa values (S3) have the US South Pole Research tabled values as quoted in the 2016 UH document.

— We see that the resulting 1990s average Related 3.03 is not the IPCC referense’s 3.2. However, a general (approximated) tolerance of (at least) ±0.2 T12 KG carbon is already mentioned in the below CARBON AND CLIMATE LandUse source. The precise values here are not (precisely) important, just the overall general proportions.

— The CfromFossil value 6.3 in the IPCC reference is significantly greater than the related (Industrial CDIAC) quoted 1990s average 5.74.

As the TheResilientEARTH source gives no information on the actual 6.3 number — whos industrially related spouse should be the specified 5.74 during the 1990s average ten years, we cannot have further comments on that difference. As we only are interested in comparing on the general picture, these differences are neither important.

The main difference between the IPCC and Related blocks is the Related specified 37%:s 1.12 T12 KG carbon from deforestation — a complex IPCC and associated apparently never have studied. The 37% deforestation part in the 100% MaunaLoa total CO2 increase is — namely — founded on the related AGW proof (The NASA original AGW temperature curve — yielding a Special Interest in Modern Corridors): From 1962 the fossil curve (type logistic growth equation, ending on a linear increase) differs significantly from the MaunaLoa curve function (close to the actually annually mean values); The Mauna Loa values begin to expose an exponential increase from 1962. And from that difference the 37% deforestation content has been deduced. See from TheExplanation.

See all the deducing details in 37% — definition: CO2content ¦ AGWproofExplains. The IPCC community has not that analysing section, and neither its resulting consequential mathematics.

So, seen from the Related side, the simple suggested Atmospheric CO2 Increase = FossilEmission + Deforestation — OceanUptake equation becomes autonomous: It is self proving — on the amount of the heavy CO2 gas from the fossil combustion industry that necessarily rolled down the hills and found its way into the oceans, tranferring its combustion heat energy to the Waters, giving birth to the AGW phenomena as such. Shorter: no missing sink. No sir.

Apparently Based on a partly and provably misapprehended expectation (LUCKILY), a likewise apparently provable general misunderstanding of the AGW complex (it is a pollution, not a climate complex: no Arrhenius math), with some additional (computer) modeled (difficult to explain in modern corridors) global values (the figure 2.9 in ”from land use” [the related 37% proof; 1.12), and a seemingly oversized ”C from fossil” figure of 6.3 versus the related Mauna Loa tabled averaged 1990s value 5.74, the idea of ”a missing carbon sink” became so established, that it (soon) was taken for granted to represent a new common ground for academic understandability (ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE) in the global warming complex of new and strange and difficult to understand issues.

The academic established ”missing sink” (the 2.9 figure) became an established academic misapprehension, unintentionally excluding the explainable cause and nature of AGW,

missing sink = 0, RelatedPhotoSynthesis, the heat energy transfer from fossil combustion (t/T = m/M) to the oceans via the (related 1990s exemplified) fossil combustion CO2 emissions. In all so academically provably appearing from an established academic lack of understanding the phenomena as such: disclaim. And also even so up to a new global academic level with the unintentional idea (Kyoto protocol) to kill even more life: ”carbon sink”.

A more upside down ”academic intelligence” would rarely exist: apparently retarded, low educated and commonly Box Dark intellectually disabled. Say.

FOREMOST PROOF — continuing increasing deforestation, adding even more CO2 by killing more alive CO2 regulators Leaf&Needle:

Monday 11 Dec2023 AFTONBLADET Sweden, Debate, ”Avverkningen av skog större än tillväxten”, Deforestation supersedes regrowth.

MidSWEDEN example Maj 2024 — the increasing deforestation enterprise in Sweden seems constantly growing year by year.

— Do you see any tendency of a decreasing CO2 atmospheric content?

Compare the Latest NOAA statement (new record high again);

— The more pushing on already alive, the more life stress is introduced, and the worse the situation becomes.

Do disclaim, anyone who can, on any relatable argument. Searched for. None yet found.

LUCKILY: IPCCcount

— In modern corridors ”the missing snk” has a special ”lucky” quotable passage:

Luckily

Related physics and mathematics only — the AGW proof basics (from 2009) — not found in modern corridors — see further below in AttestingWyatt2013

The fact THAT fossil combusted CO2 becomes ocean absorbed DEFINES the global warming process (t/T=a[m/M]; t/m=a[T/M]; T=[t/m]/a). Not damping it or diminishing it.

— The fossil burning temperature (T ¦ 2200°C for Carbon) relates (emits) to the affected atmospheric mass (M) as the resulting atmospheric temperature (t) relates to the (emitted) fossil combusted mass (m), including losses from a general (thermal) absorption coefficient (a). Related physics, no academic:

The complete derivation and description is given (2010) from TheAGWProof2. Through the general gas law, all parameters can be determined;

With (STP, Standard Temperature and Pressure): m/t = 7 T12 KG/(0.6+0.1[1–2/17])°C= 10.17094 T12 KG/°C; a=0.7; M=2Ta(m/t)=3.52138 T16 KG; h=53,35 M.

The T combusted M affected (CO2) mass m is the leading most ground heavy atmospheric gas: it follows the ground continents to their edges, and from there is absorbed by the oceans along with its innate combusted heat energy (t), which is transferred to water’s much higher heat capacity. That explains AGW;

— The fossil combusted heat is end-station dumped into the oceans by their CO2 absorption (also under the higher resulting CO2 emission atmospheric gas pressure). Part of this ocean CO2 absorption, now temperature normalized atmospheric CO2, is returned (recycled) to the atmosphere, where it unites with other (excessive) CO2 atmospheric emitting agents, all into the total annually (from 1958) measured global mean Mauna Loa atmospheric CO2 values.

The quoted Luckily source (apparently unaware of the gravity of the situation) expresses, and exemplifies, a provably direct retarded idea of the whole situation. The source — general academic established consensus, what we know — apparently interprets an underlying urgent global alarm as a new form of opportunity to announce a new form of global charity from Life Itself — lucky us, no offense. That is, unless this print is disclaimed as a faulty and ignorant, and inappropriate, statement.

— Again: Return to IPCCversusRelated ¦ RelatedPhotoSynthesis and see how Lucky we are

Related physics and mathematics.

— ”The missing sink” (origin: The1958Fatal) in modern corridors has formed a fatal and life destructive academic complex.

Disclaim (suggested, related, formulations):

— Modern academia IPCC community ”The missing sink” has created an Emperor’s New Clothes Kill Forest Promotion Enterprise in stating this (Kyoto protocol: carbon sink forestry): Regrowth will suck up excessive (fossil) Atmospheric CO2.

Related consequential mathematics:

— The IPCC (so apparently retarded, low educated and profoundly intellectually disabled stupid scientifical community) only adds further CO2 to the atmosphere, now too from »systematically actually motivated forest murder» — announcing IT to be a new form of global charity to humanity. Disclaim.

— The truth behind forest killing ideas is that the situation worsens and have taken (expanding) catastrophic proportions for natural life and health on Earth:

Active life power reduction. Leaf&Needle sun light uptaking energy is fighting against too high working stress on to few workers. Disclaim. Shorter:

— IPCC community promotes biological killing of humanity — by drift. Not plan. Not understanding the function in nature. But believing itself to stand above it.

”The missing sink” — although apparently a long term serious academia problem — has no named article in Wikipedia (Oct2024).

ABOUT: The New Billion Users Me Likey Popular World Fascistic By Drift Not Plan We Say You Do Wide Cookies Dictatorship Costume: site blocked, no access — unless consenting on the New Popular No HumanRight Recognition or Mentioning Not One Word Humanright Governmental Parliamentary World Wide State Police Justice Department Organization;

— Shut the fuck up.

Internet (2024) becomes increasingly hostile

— »you cannot be interested in whatever you are interested in and at the same time be left alone as in the old days any more: we must be inside of your You Mind, now, you see .. watching every move YM makes, registering .. data collecting .. (you amenable stupid compliant Ape .. we can’t hear you .. you were saying? ..) ..».

NO ACCESS UNLESS CONSENTING ON NON HUMANRIGHT RECOGNITION: not one word

Internet Growing Enterprise of Cookie Dictatorship

Reflecting present Internet 2024 with the original open info 2015 (WhatMissingSink):

Today Oct2024: Trying to get a clue of any mentioned value meets with many blockings and obstacles @Internet. Most of them deny direct access by demanding — or directly dictating — cookies consent. Still not one word humanright recognition or mentioning. Box. Dark. Drift. Maybe they have run out of Battery ..

— No specified value found (Oct2024). Wikipedia has no article about it, what we know (highly infected issue, too difficult to handle). It seems that it still is around the year 2015 that the still available freedom of press did deliver the scientific open public information, as quoted above in WhatMissingSink.

LandUSE: LUCKILY

»land use»?

” For the 1990′s, ocean models and a variety of data-based approaches suggest that the ocean sink was 2.2+-0.4 PgC/yr.”; 1 PentaGram = T12 KG = 1 TeraKG — T ¦ t for 10^± ;

CARBON AND CLIMATE — Ocean Uptake | The Basics, 2009-2014 — IPCCquote

King1994 ¦

Internet collected environmental URL references around 2010-2015 no longer 2024 responds to their URL locations. We meet messages of type ”Sorry, yo have no access to this document”, or (growing) Dictating Cookies blocking previously free and open access, or ”This document does not exist”.

It is as if Previous Free has be hijacked by Must Consent with We Own You Fucked Up fuckups.

Illustrated: This once was a placid, most energizing place.

Sweden: — »WE HAVE fucking LEGAL JURISDICTIONAL BUSINESS ENTERPRISE fucking RIGHT TO DEGRADE YOUR — fuck FUCKING ENVIRONMENTAL fucking — VISION»:

WHERE IS WORLD JURISDICTION? — It has become a Paid Bitch to Perpetrators? Poor people have no say. Sweden. New Mississippi 1820 — in Cyberspace? Destructors. Destroyers. Box. Dark. Drift.

— »We CANNOT TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOU FUCKING VISION».

We have the source and its central quoted content. here from a 2015 UH document. Now 2024 Internet does no longer respond for its URL.

Many alike older quoting sources expose the same hostility in todays Internet: some demand cookies consent, otherwise no access. Some claim the source does no longer exist — that is the most interesting part, as we have the proofs here. And some frankly informs ”You have no access to this article”. Apparently we already have all the access we need. So .. You Internet Ace Administrator were saying and claiming?

— Maybe the Open Public Science Internet is about to close down and shut down all access due to increasing Attacks on The Server. Is there anything at all you Can handle?

— How about shutting down all type of Interactive Cookies on The Server? Because if there is no Interactive Info on a Server, a Hacker has nothing to do there: there is nothing to destroy. There is nothing and Nobody to Contact. No bridge to cross. No Keyhole to break.

— Try to keep up. The more greed an Emperor collects, the more thieves is drawn to his house. Say again. The more charity, the happier family. Animals like it too.

ExplanationFOUND — Nov2015 — Nov2024: The King1994 archive’s science link is no longer available — but the same text source still exists:

— Internet constantly changes FACE .. kills old archives .. builds new ones .. — search for: King 1994, In search of .. leads to an open PDF, but it cannot be searched in .. and it cannot be PDF downloaded ..

(Some of) The sampled URL-addresses from the 2015 now 2024 shows a veritable Tivoli of crappy nothing or worse: they simply no longer connect. But (some of) the sources still exists. Try a Search for the actual headline paper wording, and the source should show up — unless blocked by cookies consent.

Or this (The Resilient Earth): ”Sorry, you have been blocked — You are unable to access ..”.

— We here in UH are using an URL Archive from 2015 where no problem existed to read the content — as already quoted 2015.

However: Testing a SEARCH on the actual quoted text: No response in ONE type of web reader — in another, only the actual UH quote: source not available. What has happened to the free and publicly scientifical open Internet 2015(World)-2024(Moon), in only nine years?

— You were saying?

— WHY IS INTERNET APPARENTLY FAILING SCIENCE? It didn’t from the start. From the start Internet was gorgeous. 2024 it looks like a shithole.

— INTERNET IS no longer BUILT FOR PUBLIC OPEN SCIENTIFIC PURPOSES ACCESS, JUST FOR BUSINESS and general influence. Disclaim. It resembles a growing shithole. Disclaim.

Related physics — on the AGW proof (2009+), continued:

— The FOSSIL EMISSION from fossil industrial combustion (HeatResistancePhysics, TheAGWproof) does NOT settle directly into the atmosphere as an end station from chimney, as most aces appear to believe (LUCKILY). The heavy CO2 gas follows Earth ground (the related deduction), and empties — first — into the oceans (heightened atmospheric CO2 gas pressure pushes further water CO2 solution), assimilating the combusted transported heat energy as ocean uptaken HEAT (the actual related AGW proof): global warming accumulation during centuries. Then, to some extent, some of that uptaken CO2 returns (cycles) back to the atmosphere as a general (MaunaLoa) atmospheric CO2 mix (fossil 63%) with the deforestation contribution (37% — definition: CO2content).

— These are related physics all graph-math results concurring with the basic NASA AGW temperature curves; From 1962 a breach appears between fossil

[industrial emissions: increase ends on a linear increase] and measured MaunaLoa — increase begins to expose an exponential feature: But modern academia (IPCC) shows no interest at all on that level of AGW analysis. Well, then, IPCC community AGW aces, related physics and mathematics says: suit your self. Tourists insisting to be left over after a Moon visit should be respected to be left alone, if they so wish.

IPCC2018in2010 ¦ TheIPCCembezzlementFraud2006+ ¦ TheIPCCfraudCollected

Disclaim if found faulty.

Related physics and mathematics — again:

»from land use»

The only way ”from land use” to add significantly extra atmospheric CO2 — having the basic MLN1812 Natural Forest’s SD=WI preference in mind — is by:

— deforestation (Removing more alive than naturally decaying cyclic): Taking away Natural Forest — without

EXTENSIVE DEFORESTATION IN SWEDEN May2024.

allowing IT to regrow (minimum 400y) as it was before the murder. Like starting a wildfire, never letting it blow out and life be returned. Shorter: creating an open bleeding wound in nature. It WANTS to heal, but it is not ALLOWED to do so by some »FuckedUp Human».

— WHERE apparently (MaunalLoaProof) no idea exists of ”A Natural Forest” (last seen 1812, MLN1812), there is (by consequence) neither any room for an idea of that what does not exist — ANF — has been (heavily) violated ever since (ANF did not exist). The teaching and educational credit of that which apparently have no idea of ANF existence, apparently neither cannot exist. So, in a shorter version: Killing By drift, Not plan, is a Modern Academia 1812+ State governmental personnel non existing issue of responsibility: it simply does not exist. A »Trade&Market FuckeUp human Society» needs no existential certification on the level of a retarded intellect. Because it doesn’t understand what it is involved in, anyway. Disclaim. Only caring for the profiting exploiting aspect, type Mississippi 1820, Drift, Not plan, does very well the job: decision. Because knowledge it is not, obviously.

TCIMS — THE IPCC COMMUNITY:s MISSING SINK ¦ TMS ¦ Proof12 ¦ WhatMissingSINK ¦ IPCCcount ¦ LUCKILY ¦ LandUSE

HowWeKnowSDconstant:

The here in UH stated SD constant average 5.8 ppmvCO2 is based on all the (2016) 57y available Mauna Loa data 1959-2016 (SCRIPPS, CDIAC) as accounted for in RefValues2017.

WHAT DOES The Modern Academia Earth IPCC ACES MEAN BY ”the missing sink” ?

HOW DO WE KNOW SDconstant 5.8ppmvCO2?

SCRUTINIZING THE PROOFS — faulty statements are not allowed in this type of production:

— don’t forget to update if found faulty;

How do we know the Natural Forest (latest 1812) Mauna Loa SD constant 5.8 ppmv CO2?

1. Investigating TheSDconstant (graphics) period 1958-2015 with the three sampling comparing values 1960, 1990 and 2015 exposes no conclusive variation (the actual samples rather expose a negative –0.20 SD at 1990 relative 1960). A more extensive averaging calculation over the period’s (SCRIPPS ¦ CDIAC) available annual data, gives the actual stated mean SD- average constant of 5.8ppmvCO2.

2. Rewinding our history (MLN1812) back to the IPCC1812GraphCO2 level (284ppmv), we arrive at a station where all 1812 previous CO2 levels (ice core samples and other) have the same approximative horizontal line extension (even backwards a thousand years). That is our Mauna Loa Proof: there is a Natural Forest. No extra of nothing. Just Nature. Ohplease.

SWEDEN June2024 — still 2024 some piece of an untouched Nature Forest .. Listen to The Silence. Words have not yet been invented. It’s like Pure POWER flowing into the Chest ..

THERE ARE STILL SOME PLACES LEFT TO VISIT AND REGAIN LIFE STRENGTH. FOR HOW LONG, THOUGH, WE DO NOT KNOW. SWEDISH STATE 2024 CONTINUES TO PROMOTE NATURE KILL.

3. Before that 1812-benchmark, Nature Forest had its natural (Summer Decrease) SD-constant the same as its (WI) Winter Increase constant, as no atmospheric extra CO2 was present.

So the Natural Forest from 1812 and back, only had that annual seasonal variation to play with: 5.8 down in summer, 5.8 up in winter. NASAgraph has additional data showing ppm variations (180-300ppm) over hundreds of thousand years depending on larger climate variations (Earth axis rotation and associated influences over longer periods).

4. Taking this SD- constant 5.8 1812 Natural Forest stand preference (MLNref)

MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2

we can, mathematically, lure out how the raising WI content brings the Mauna Loa Keeling Curve to begin its increase (1812+).

TheMaunaLoaProofEXAMINATION

5. — With raising CO2 content, the WI return (Sep+) from the SD delivery (May+ 5.8) brings with it the yearly accumulated extra added CO2 up to a higher level than the previous year.

— Resembling a staircase; Every new step ahead entails a first (SD) step down, always the same step height. Then (WI) comes a step up a little higher than the previous WI step up.

And so it has continued ever since (now for 2024-1812=212y) — still with no decreasing tendency in sight (Oct2024). Part of the CO2 increase (related physics) comes (2015 preference) from the fossil combustion (63%), and part from the continuing deforestation (37% — and increasing). But modern academia has no that preference.

MaunaLoaVariations ¦ TheGlobalCOUNT — 2015 ¦ 37% — definition: CO2content

LatestCO2:

At present (latest from NOAA):

STILL CLIMBING WITH NEW RECORD HIGHs:

” Based on the annual report from NOAA’s Global monitoring Lab, global average atmospheric carbon dioxide was 419.3 parts per million (ppm for short) in 2023, setting a new record high.”,

” The increase between 2022 and 2023 was 2.8 ppm — the 12th year in a row where the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere increased by more than 2 ppm.”,

NOAA Climate.gov ¦ Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide (29Oct2024)

A MODEL CITIZEN:

Finally: a first one found preferential model example of World Citizen Conduct (page end):

”We value your feedback .. Help us improve our content .. Your Email Address .. Feedback”.

— Finally a Domain in Universe that DOES understand this Basic (Already in Children and Animals):

— Improvements, developments of any kind, is made by a cooperating free will of individual OPINIONS.

— Give, and take, Arguments (on a Humanright foundation: science interest only).

No Cookies Dictatorship. No Interest Interference. No Humanright recognition Denial. Perfect Assembly.

— You’re The Man. (»We must inform all other billion uninformed humanity killing fuckups»). Begin here.

climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide

It is impossible to make any improvement on such an excellent example of citizenship. We love you. 24/7. No breaks.

As exposed earlier in UH: From 1962, the CO2 increase took an exponential increasing form — a type morphology that cannot be exposed by the fossil combustion enterprise (general global energy usage shows a max linear increase — the general Logistic Growth Equation morphology).

The Logistic GROWTH Equation:

— Furnish a pond with fish ROM — and its population will follow the LGE — depending on nutrition and constant of population [ life area].

Basic Earth World Humanity Energy Function mathematics — any cultural epoch. Generally named [ technological ] evolution.

— The TOP evolves further on [ endlessly ] approaching a constant linear maximum level of energy use.

Only remaining agent to relate the huge continuing CO2 increase, then, is: deforestation.

Compare the different documents in UH in Sweden, exposing part of the seemingly never ending national »HiTech Festivities».

So now the Reader knows how much the UniverseHistory production has fallen in love with that one.

MidSWEDEN Spring 2024 —— State Governments continue to allow a kill on original Nature Forest. We will continue those documenting apparent nature violating reports, as long as we can.

Sane adults don’t do this. As they now do, something, somehow, in their — our — cultural history, went really bad and wrong. We see a society that apparently missed a true on ramp to true technological development. Disclaim.

HowWeKnowSDconstant ¦ LatestCO2

TheExplanation: HowWeKnowSDconstant ¦

RELATED PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS has a way to prove how the atmospheric extra CO2 is divided between fossil CO2 (63%) and deforestation CO2 (37%). There is no theory in there, not even close. Only a use of already presented and collected global data on atmosphere and Earth surface properties with general global energy use. The rest is »a simple» mathematical expedition — clearly exposable, explainable and relatable with illustrations.

FÖRKLARINGEN

Aavskogningsavslöjandet, finns det en förklaring inne i det Vardagsrummet, eller? FOSSILT CO2 och AVSKOGAT CO2 har olika matematik

KAN DU FÖRKLARA GRUNDEN TILL ”37%”?

— JaA, först: Man får poäng för att man försöker.

37% — definition: CO2content ¦ AGWproofExplains

CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE FOUNDATION BEHIND THAT ”37%”?

— Please?

LGEref:

Logistic Growth Equation

LTE, Logistiska TillväxtEkvationens funktionsform (ideala AGW-funktionen, tAGW-kurvan)

liknande energikurvan (globala energianvändningen) för mänsklighetens möjliga tekniska energianvändning

• innefattar ingen exponentiell ökningsform — endast en maximalt rät (parabolisk asymptotisk) tillväxt

• med fossilförbränningen som ideal energikälla, kan omöjligen en exponentiell CO2 ökningstakt i

extra atmosfäriskt tillkommet CO2 ske, det blir av princip uteslutet på en Planet, en region, med Begränsad massa.

Breaking the Quiet .. 1962 ..

MAUNA LOA MÄTVÄRDENA från 1962

• antar en märkbar exponentiell tillväxtökning i extra tillkommet atmosfäriskt CO2

• vi utnyttjar den brytpunkten för att syntetisera de två möjliga olika Matematiska funktionerna,

• så ATT vi kan bestämma xy-grämserna i skala och värden för vidare jämförelse;

I och med att LTE är basen i hela framställningen (NASA-CRU-temperaturkurvan i basanalysen från 2009, AGW-beviset i relaterad fysik), är också

• LTE:s xy skalor absolut givna: tid (x — från 1812 idealiserat) och temperatur/energi/FossilKolemission (y),

• Däremot är en motsvarande ideal (samma som mätvärdena in till 100.00%) Mauna Loa Mätvärdeskurva enbart given i x-led, tiden (från 1812)

— medan däremot y-skalan inte är bestämd: vi känner den inte, men vi kan bestämma den (med hög noggrannhet) enligt följande Kända Kriterium:

• Vi söker först en 100.00% matchande Mauna Loa Funktion (MLF);

• Vi använder sedan MLF med variabla y-värden för att söka en sådan MLF som

• med avseende på den observerade brytpunkten 1962 mot LTE

• uppvisar så nära, omärkligt, avvikande FORM mot LTE (1812-1962) som vi alls kan få fram

• vilket vi gör genom visuell grafisk analys med prövningar av MLF(y) tills »praktisk överensstämmelse uppnås» — avvikelserna blir »omärkligt små.».

• Den analysen grundas alltå på en x-Offsetförskjutning mot LTE enbart för att kolla formpassningen: förskjutning i x-led endast, med test på y-vertikalens formändringsfaktor.

• Med ett.MLF(Y) resultat fastställt, placerar vi sedan den kurvan på LTE-kurvans samastämmiga tidsaxel (från 1812+).

— I slutänden kan vi alltid pröva det erhållna MLF(Y) på praktiskt uppmätta reella årliga Mauna Loa medelvärden. Det resultatet bestämmer (alldeles tveklöst) graden av tillförlitlighet i analysen.

Result37: TheExplanation

• Resultatet visar en vertikalförskjutning MLN(y) – LTE(y) som bara har en enda kvarvarande agent att återfalla på:

• avskogningens andel. Klart — nästan, se vidare nedan i TheFinalCountDown.

— Men hiskeligt mycket grundjobb innan färdigt.

Bara att läsa av och presentera resultatet (37% av MLN är avskognings CO2, 63% är fossilt CO2 — i etablerade led räknar man också med industriproduktionen av Cement, som — under härdningen — emitterar CO2 från Jordmineral som hämtats ur Jordskorpan för cementproduktionen; en nettosiffra på runt 5% extra atmosfäriskt CO2 brukar synas i de olika beskrivningarna; vi frånser här den delen helt och hållet).

37% — definition: CO2content ¦ AGWproofExplains

MLF ¦

— Grundformen med relationen

t/T = m/M gäller INTE med icke-fossilt emitterat CO2:

— Varför inte?

— Förbränningsfaktorn (T) finns inte med där. Helt utesluten.

Men inte heller den aspekten tycks ha uppmärksammats inom IPCC samfundet.

— Det är också en detalj i den allmänna framställningen:

• Enbart utspritt CO2 i luft ger — räkneexempel — ringa värmehöjande effekter men kan göra det i tillfälligt samlade mängder över lokalt små områden, typ hetbubblor och tillfälliga tornados (och starkt ökad benägenhet för extrema atmosfäriska urladdningar):

”— Inte ens med exemplet HELA den drygt 200-åriga fossilindustridumpen — 116ppmv perioden 1812-2015 — ges mera än en tusendels värmegrad +0,001°C i tillskott. Enbart på den grovräkningens kredit utesluts med andra ord varje möjlighet att några som helst nämnvärda AGW-bidrag kan komma i fråga från extra tillfört icke-fossilrelaterad koldioxidemission till atmosfären.

— Däremot har Lokala Väderkrafterna ett och annat att tillägga — verkligen en överraskande upplysning:”

Ovanstående relaterad fysik och matematik i utdrag från Värmemotstånd och Trädens känslighet för LOKALA Koldioxidvariationer. Utförliga jämförande räkneexempel.

TheFinalCountdown: Result37

THE FINAL COUNTDOWN ¦ Result37 — finding the 37% solution

The Proving Requisite

Depending on the rate of exponential (ML1962+) over the (integral) max linear end extension (LTE, beginning from the breaking point y1962), on credit of the resulting actual MLF(Y), there is still one last (Result37) point to be clarified:

• determination of a first basic Offset Difference related to the starting 1962 point.

— The curves deflect, no doubt, so how do we find any kind of a fix reference?

— How do we do that?

FROMtNASA2009: The FinalCD

Our actual LTE mathematics form

(it has not the actual LTE expression, but another one, similar to the LTE form, the one we (in UH) name The General Power/Energy Function ¦ PowerEnergyBasicMath)

POWER-Energy curvature versus the LTE Logistic growth :

Principally the same shape, however not the exact same mathematical formula

is the smoothed version of the original NASA-CRU temperature/energy (industrial statistics global energy use) curvature: our t(NASA) curve.

• The t(NASA):s integral form reflects the actual industrial (ideal 100%) fossil CO2 emission function (with simple correlated transfer coefficients, as detailed in the actual deduced sections).

t(AGW)INTEGRAL — deduction ¦ t(AGW)IntegralSubstitutions — complementary

• The point is: The Fossil Curve [the t(NASA) integral] has no definite mathematical solution (as accounted for in the above linked deduction);

— Precise exact curve xy points can only, then, be calculated using numerical/arithmetical solutions (The Simpson Integral Method or The HypoSeries Integral Method).

• So (lots of Orange and Apples and Juice .. try to keep up now ..) we had to divide the MLN-t(AGW)Integral analysis into (graphical curvature) x-axis Unit sections (table above with the integral numerical solved curvature) — comparing each of them for scrutinizing a final general (37%) result (we are allowed to rest, but never to give up);

• THE RESULT of the Unit comparing evaluation is exposed (graphically) in the actual 37% section;

Proving The Deforestation Component in atmospheric CO2 emissions

— from the Mauna Loa Exponential increase beginning from 1962

• The graphical result apparently exposes a (smoothing) »finalization» CURVATURE »horizontalized» TREND approximated at the level of 63% on the t(AGW)Int ÷ MLF Relational Domain — generalized during an onset (normalization to horizontal) approximately beginning from year 1941 (from where it is, then, implied that the ideal 100% fossil CO2 atmospheric emissions on energy use will be compromised by a growing deforestation CO2 atmospheric contribution, as noted earlier, as definitely provable, in the Mauna Loa values from 1962, no doubt).

— Nothing, of this is mentioned in modern (IPCC community) literature, what we know.

CONCLUSION: The Explanation

BECAUSE OF (the lack of modeling features in this report)

no modeling features, just calculating on the actual (smoothed) measured curvature functions, as deduced (consequential mathematics),

the only standard disclaiming feature of the 37% result analysis excursion (2009-2015) lies on the accurateness of the measuring instrumental data, and the mathematical precision with which these data have been exploited for the purpose. There is really no theoretical issue or aspect in the complex of investigation. So, by that standard, the 37% result seems as easy to remove as producing a genuine Mid SWEDISH HiTech baldcut. Enjoy.

The National Aces have been driving over literally everything. So, why not take advantage of the situation, and take the rest too?

MidSWEDEN Spring, early summer 2024 —— State Governments continue to allow killing of original Nature Forest. We here in UH will continue those documenting apparent nature violating reports, as long as we can.

Sane adults don’t do this. As they now do, something, somehow, in their cultural history, went really bad and wrong. A society that apparently missed the true on ramp to true technological development. Disclaim.

SummingThe37:

SUMMING THE 37% PROOF:

And again — The deforestation is killing Life Issue:

Depending on the rate of exponential (ML1962+) continuing Mauna Loa measured values over the max linear t(AGW) integral fossil CO2 emission possible extension, the starting point (@y1962) on its (so) determined 37% deforestation CO2 atmospheric dumping contribution,

no modeling features, just calculating on the actual (smoothed) measured curvature functions, as deduced (consequential mathematics),

will indicate WHETHER those now (2024+) Mauna Loa measured values will continue — or not — to expose exponential increasing TRENDS: continued deforestation, or not:

• The Mauna Loa measure DO divulge the atmospheric CO2 contributions from deforestation, the 37% t(AGW) proof, whether it is accelerating or decelerating;

— Again: Return to

IPCCversusRelated ¦ RelatedPhotoSynthesis

and see how Lucky we are

Anybody home?

»REPENT» — and start HELP building a World Citizen Society Worth Remembering: Defense (»don’t be a coward»: Excuse me: Children and even Animals are born with it, but the present World State Governments seem to have

forgotten The Basics: Humanright recognition). Independent of Region. Central for all Nations. HumanRight Basics. 24/7. No breaks. Indestructible, as it may be interpreted, unless disclaimed. Claim whatever you want.

REDUCED AMOUNT OF SUN LIGHT ENERGY UPTAKING LEAF&NEEDLE DEFINES REDUCED LIFE POWER. Disclaim. THEY MADE US [SIMARD2012]. AND WE FEEL THE HURT WHEN THEY ARE KILLED.

— There is no ”carbon sink” feature in physics — except in the IPCC modeling computer world screen presentations. Disclaim.

IPCC community:

— Disclaim — or wake up: Stop promoting a kill, a murder, of Life on Earth.

World State Governments 2024:

— You blind?

TCOT: SummingThe37 ¦ TheExplanation

Deductions — on observations. No consensus. Only Knowledge = Science — or not at all.

We know — or we don’t.

COMPARE — THE CONCEPT OF TRUTH:

(Sw.. sanningsbegreppet. sanningspostulatet: sanning är visshet; 1+1=2=21-19..):

STATEMENT:

TRUTH is Certainty — it is so defined.

PROOF:

— ”There is no Truth” is a perfectly certain statement.

Come again.

Certification:

• And as such a perfect lie.

• Because truth IS certainty.

• Disclaim.

If it cannot be disclaimed, it just becomes stronger.

MATHEMATICS.

There is no way to escape truth from a definition of certainty (Disclaim). »Never created». Cannot be destroyed. Cannot change (DHARMA). »Truth kills Lie».

— It is a purification process. Like eating an Apple. Like healing from a wound. Nature is good.

Its supreme domain has a special name: — Mathematics (5). Especially the one named Consequential Mathematics (COMA). All vectors included. Very powerful stuff. Resulting Conduct Recommendation: Tenderness and care: Defense. — »Good makes good — and bad makes bad».

— You wanted to say what did you say you wanted to remark on the present state of the affairs did yoy say you wanted to say, you said?

— You wanted to say?

EXAMPLE:

FN2024 ¦ TheClaim

TheExplanation ¦ LGEref ¦ Result37 ¦ TheFinalCountdown ¦ FROMtNASA2009 ¦ SummingThe37 ¦ TCOT

EPILOGUE: 2Nov2024

TheProvableIPCCFraudulentEmbezzlementCollected — GLOBAL WARMING PROJECTIONS: by drift, not by any deliberate planning. Disclaim;

Proving the 37% deforestation component — THE IPCC COMMUNITY:s MISSING SINK —— AttestingWyatt2013

WHY NOT MODERN ACADEMIC CORRIDORS?

— Why have none of these highly elementary mathematical observations been observed by the many students inside the modern academic teaching system?

Test General Cosmological Illustrated Answer in CAP.

— Suddenly (AttestingWYATT2013) beginning from 2013, the IPCC-community starts running wild .. Disclaim:

AGWdetails2013: EPILOGUE ¦ TheAGWproof ¦ TheIPCCfraudCollected

The Global Warming details 2013

COMPILED PARTS FROM THE 2013 UH PRODUCED AND COLLECTED MATERIAL

Modern academia global warming computer modeling projections — proving that the named has no connection to the actual reality surrounding humanity:

— Not even close to. We will study how, and why.

For the original t(NASA) curve and its related (world global energy use), see

Direct Proportionality between temperature and Energy

(General Gas Law: E= k · t = pV: temperature and energy relates a constant).

NOTE. CLIMATE mathematics is handled through Arrhenius Math.

NOTE: POLLUTION (AGW) is not a climate issue: no climate math applies.

Pollution is an energy math issue.

LogisticScienceREF: AGWdetails2013

Summing AGW-IPCC 2013

— Why not MAC?

1. • MAC apparently does not realize the (AGWproof) logistic nature of the complex — acts as if it has a limitless extension (»everybody can win»). Instead the IPCC modeling community apparently races on different computer model scenarios, not at all connecting the actual t(NASA) fit (2).

— IF this author would be The Retarded Aspect on that whole complex, having misunderstood the entire aim of the whole performance, we humbly apologize and will begin to practice the art of dying in shame.

IPCC2018in2010 ¦ TheIPCCembezzlementFraud2006+ ¦ TheIPCCfraudCollected

2. • MAC apparently ignores the (AGWproof) apparent visual obvious 150y (1850-2000) curve fitting as so defined by the instrumentally measured t(NASA) curve values; The t(NASA) smoothed Energy function in (1). And the values produced by a basic simple wave (one short, one long) ocean period formation (AttesingWyatt2013). With a graph drawing program (DELPHI4 in Windows API, and understanding some basic wave form interference) the ones which will fit were soon worked out: (2009)

OceanPeriods: LogisticScienceREF ¦ AGWdetails2013

AttestingWyatt2013

SurfaceOCEANperiods, as suggested — 2010: not observed in modern corridors

The strangest, as it seems: modern quarters completely ignores this obvious FIT. It almost perfectly defines a 150 year period of temperature variations as assembled by the t(NASA) derived smoothed temperature-energy curve (E), plus two sine wave form periods of respectively 21y and 62y, apparently shaping the t(NASA) during 150 years. Not noticed in modern quarters. Or: frankly ignored. Because of other more prominent academic inducements (SummingAGW-IPCC 2013). See the IPCC academia modeling aces part in the illustration (AGWdetails2013). Not even close to reality — unless we have missed some vital parts of our Mother Ship:

TheAGWProof:

AGWdetails2013 ¦ TheIPCCfraudCollected

Temperature-Energy basics

Planckenergin E = hf = mcr/t = mcc ger grundsambanden; c=λf, f=c/λ;

Sambandet mellan strålenergi (E) och stråltemperatur (t) ges genom Planckenergin hf och Planckstrålningslagens derivata som Wiens förskjutningslag (Wienkonstanten k = 2,898 t3 M°K) λ = k/t. Insättning i Planckenergin E=hf=hc/λ ger E = t(hc/k) = t · konstant. Värdena för energi (E) respektive temperatur (t) skiljer bara på en skalomvandlingskonstant.

Integralen för E samlar den massa (här CO2) som energin utvecklas på. Genom att Energi också definieras som produkten av Effekt (P) och Tid (t), E=Pt — Pt definierar en yta, och integraler är ytdomäner — blir tangensformen (derivatan) för E lika med effekten (P).

Se även Allmänna gaslagen direkt: E = pV = kT; E/T = k.

The AGW proof (16Oct2009)

Left: The original t(NASA)-CRU global warming temperature curve. Here it is x-axis reduced for adoption in length with the (right) general t(NASA) smoothed Energy (E) curve (GlobalEnergyUse — the world global maximum possible fossil emissions).

Right: The adopted time scale version of the t(NASA) smoothed ideal energy/temperature global warming curve

— also the global industrial energy usage (FOSSIL EMISSIONS) curve to be compared with available actual industrial statistics. See Global Fossil Carbon Emissions.

Sorting out the shape (end) of this E-curve in this Universe History production (2009+) was simply a job between its precise mathematics and the two wave periods (AGWdetails) — for the end station to a FIT with the given t(NASA). (All carriages must be connected to the Locomotive in order for the train to perform the Transport, Modern Academia, no doubt).

Dashed - - - - - = The AGW proof (2009): PREFIXxSIN ¦ Þ = π :

GRAPH ¦ Unit50pixel:

y = 6[1–1/(1+[x/10]’4)]+0.222(0.9[(2sinþx/1.48)+0.5(sin3þ[x–0.1]/1.48)])

TEMPERATURE ¦ OpenOfficeCellCode:See Energy-Temperature relation basics;

t = -0.4+(1.765)*(1-1/(1+((Year-1815)/212.7)^4)) + 0.0653*(0.9*((2*COS(PI()*(YEAR-1880)/31.48))) + 0.5*(COS(3*PI()*(YEAR-1880-0.1)/31.48)))

AGW-energikurvan E blir samma som y = 6[1–1/(1+[x/10]’4)] med enda skillnad i en skalkoefficient mellan t och E. Se utförligt i AGWenergikurvan.

Se även koefficienten för uttrycket i m(ENERGI), emissionerna i KG massa, samt hela kurvkomplexet (Juli2010) i EffektEnergiAGW.

Logistics Transportation Example. 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + .. + n = n. Some academic aces might find that a too difficult Quest. Suddenly around 2013, The AGWproof, the Fit is no longer a fit .. see from Attesting Wyatt 2013

How to make things fit. Maybe not the 2013 modern academia IPCC aces strongest inducement.

— And that was the end of it. No modeling, Modern Academia, no doubt. No theory. Just a (simple) mathematical job to get it straight with Nature: the instrumental values (FOSSIL EMISSIONS).

ANSWER to Why not MAC:

The AGWproof — illustrated

1. Apparently Not realizing the Nature of the complex, as proved.

2. Apparently Ignoring a highly substantial 150 year long proof, as proved.

We — easily — see from that information that also any aspect of ”a 37%” proof readily becomes out of the question.

No deforestation proof. Media (2024) still holds on to the academic idea that it is the fossil emperor that rules the convictions. Deforestation continues, even more (compare Last NOAA CO2 report 2024)

— Funny that modern academia also doesn’t ignore that one, too .. or are they?

— Perhaps their telephone lines are down (too).

— Perhaps the alphabet is next on the menu (too).

AttestingWyatt2013: TheASGWproof

Related physics and mathematics presents (3Nov2024)

The IPCC community’s unconscious global warming fraud — Global Warming Projections

INTRODUCTION — faulty statements are not allowed in this presentation. Under no circumstamces.

The WYATT group results 2013:

The partly but definitely principally concordant observations from the Wyatt group publications Oct2013 (WYATToceanPERIODS) gives some further substance to the above noted conclusions: There is an awaiting »zero temperature raising» (38y) period between approximately y2000 and y2040.

Around y2040 (2038) there will be a profoundly steep temperature raise, says the above periodically oceanically deduced or associated variations (TheAGWproof).

— The global warming phenomena has no connection to CLIMATE. Only to POLLUTION — which is the reason it cannot be explained mathematically by the Arrhenius mathematics (IPCC community’s most familiar pet). See special section in ComparingTheArrheniusMATH.

It gives a partial credit to the original t(NASA) curve — up to 2006 — proving that the perpetrators have no idea of what they are involved in (tampering with the already established GlobalEnergyUse Statistics, creating a burglary, an open embezzlement, from around 2006 to better suit the IPCC community’s computer modeling results):

— do correct if wrong: The IPCC computer modeling community begins driving over Humanity’s own already accounted energy physics statistics, in order to favorize the IPCC ideas over the real and true ones — certainly no sane educated human makes such an intrusion:

— adjusting to fit, by observing that Nature does not approve on IPCC — from 2006 .. Before that, apparenly: ”It’s OK”;

THE »WYATT PAUSE» — BECOMES REJECTED .. 2015 ..

— a New nasa cirve appears (from 2017) with a breach, erasing the periodic plateu 2000-2040

BECAUSE OF THE late ESTABLISHED IDEA THAT IT IS THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY COMPUTER AI MODELING Aces THAT RULES THE UNIVERSE, AND NOT NATURE (stupid, dumass fuckup) — disclaim:

IPCC2018in2010 ¦ TheIPCCfraudCollected

— ”The Wyatt Pause” was rejected,

From around 2017 the following 2000 revised previous NASA-curve appears in public (CRU2017):

IPCC2006Embezzlement: AGWdetails2013

DATA VALUES to the Blue CRUuea2017 curve (and the actual curve as such) was collected (2018) here from the CRUdata source in The Swedish Edition of OpenOfficeCalc CheopsAGW201718.ods Tabell2 (Year, Smoothed, Anomaly) 1850-2017, the actual blue curve in Tabell3.

The orange curve is the original t(NASA) temperature function — in standard PREFIXxCOS in OpenOffice cellcode as

-0.4+(1.765)*(1-1/(1+((Year-1815)/212.7)^4)) + 0.0653*(0.9*((2*COS(PI()*(YEAR-1880)/31.48))) + 0.5*(COS(3*PI()*(YEAR-1880-0.1)/31.48)))

with an additional input »What year has what temperature addition from zero @1860» equative CalCard in Bio2024.ods Tabell3 with additional tabled values.

Bio2024.ods ¦ Tabell2 A1

It ends on a final saturated maximum from about (tAGWlimit) year 2300 with ocean period variations finally between +1.6 and +1.9 °C — provided an ideal continued atmospheric emitted fossil industrial combustion. As that will not happen (optimistic as we are here in UH) the energy usage will continue on its saturated level on credit of other more advanced sources than stealing power from Earth Rotation or other environmental destructive inventions. The added level of +1°C comes around year 2120 — with a continued fossile industry, the original t(NASA) global warming temperature curve says.

TheAGWproof

APPARENTLY CAUSED BY THE IPCC TERRORIZING 2000-2040 »WyattGroup PLATEU»:

A sudden breach from the former t(NASA) curve shows up @Internet around 2017. The breaching point comes, as seen, around year 2006 — and is more in line with the IPCC modeled trends in the AGWdetails2013 collection: more HiTech solutions.

— Why not cut the rest too? You were saying?

REVISITINGtNASAoriginal:

TheAGWproof 2013:

TheFRAUD: REVISITINGtNASAoriginal ¦ AttestingWyatt2013

— Disclaim:

It isn’t even close to likely that a physical FIT of stated measured temperature variations would exist with high precision during 150 years (2006–1860=146).

And then, suddenly

— BEGINNING TO BE REARRANGED FROM some year 2013, apparently caused by an upset scientific climate community observing that Nature does Not consent reality with the IPCC aces’ private computer modeling pet sessions, not even close —

breaks down to apparent chaos: the scientific community revision of The Curve performance from around 2006, and only FROM there, not significantly before, into the future. The Global Fossil Emission Energy Use IPCC2006Embezzlement. Beginning in vandalized values from around 2006. Not (significantly) before.

TheIPCCfraudCollected: TheFRAUD

Tempoeratur-Energy basics ¦ TheAGWproof

IPCC scientific community 2006+, featured, as proven:

— »It’s OK up till 2006. From there, We take over, (fucking ape .. what do you care .. you do as told anyway .. you were saying .. we can’t hear you .. you were saying?)».

What we know, not so officially said, but it appears as if.

Do correct if wrong.

Faulty statements are not allowed in this type of production.

— Alternatively:

— We did not realize out great mistake? (Students, PhD:s, Peer Reviewers, Encyclopedists .. A students ..).

— Is that the only one, or is there a coming some more? (You know .. a Stop at red light .. and stuff like that .. ).

(»As AI automated we have become these days, we don’t have to care about anyting of that kind either»).

— OK .. How nice and kind of you to admit that. Well, let’s take it into the future from there then; Humanright recognition.

COLLECTED and compiled 3Nov2024 ILLUSTRATION OF

THE SCIENTIFIC IPCC COMMUNITY’S EXECUTED KNOWLEDGE EMBEZZLEMENT — please do disclaim, anyone who can. Searched for. Not yet found.

— The IPCC community behind the embezzlement 2006+ has frankly ignored the actual Global Industry Statistics Fossil Energy Use E and begotten to create a new one — from 2006 only: Arrhenius Energy-Temperature Begin, Why?

DUE TO THE OTHERWISE ERASED — shredded — COMPUTER MODELING GLOBAL WARMING PROJECTIONS, VERY POPULAR PET IN IPCC COMMUNITY, apparently;

— The IPCC scientific community never understood that AGW is a pollution — a hyperbolic mathematics issue. Not a CLIMATE issue — the Arrhenius math expressions. Say again, Modern Academic Aces. You were saying?

———————————————

Arrhenius Climate Mathematics ¦ REVISITINGtNASAoriginal ¦ TheAGWproof — Jul2010 ¦ TheMaunaLoaProof — Jan2017 ¦ AttestingWyatt2013 ¦ GlobalEnergyUse

IPCC scientific community, please: The smoothed Global Energy Use statistics is as defined related and deduced the apparent direct visual morphologically fitted original t(NASA) curve as its two Ocean periods (also partly attested by the Wyatt group results from 2013) plus the so deduced-fitted smoothed Global Industry Statistics human world energy E-curve: what humanity is using on the energy side of the coin and its history.

— Not the Arrhenius derivative 0.55e^0.55x of the Arrhenius corresponding e^0.55x CO2 curve. Not even close. Not at all of any kind of the same nature of physics or mathematics. You have a Problem with that? Global Warming Projections:

IPCC2018in2010 ¦ TheIPCCembezzlementFraud2006+ ¦ TheIPCCfraudCollected ¦ REVISITINGtNASAoriginal

— Yes sir, IPCC scientific community, you certainly have. And so provable down to last universal atom — or not at all. Disclaim.

— What we know: there is no way you can TALK yourself out of the Trap you set up for yourself from square one, and apparently now have been caught in, do correct if wrong:

— The idea that POLLUTION — AGW — has any kind of connection to CLIMATE math, Arrhenius stuff.

— You missed the Energy Aspect — the Source of the complex. And you should be associated with ”scientific”? Retarded, low educated, intellectually disabled. Say again.

— You were saying?

— ALWAYS CHECK ON AN ENERGY SOURCE — before fancying on ideas of physics. — Did you even pass the third grade? Please share.

♦ The keyword is: LOGISTIC GROWTH EQUATION.: we can’t breed pines to the Moon.

♦ ENERGY BASICS — any process in nature evolves to a LIMIT . Energy function. AGWproof.

— IF we take it from there, it is impossible to make any significant mistakes: No Missing Atoms. No Arrhenius on AGW. No mother god loving way.

Correct global warming temperature morphological scientific formulation: the original t(NASA) curve (AttestingWyatt2013). No IPCC statements. Say.

— You were saying?

Stop pushing humanity into conseting academic prisons.

Is this a mistaken explanation? Explain.

— Apparently IPCC community’s popular Student Therapy in its presented Global Warming Projections all emanate from the above illustrated Arrhenius CO2 derivative (y’). And that proves the coherence and the source of the fraudulent IPCC act — and also exposes the magnitude of its inherited stupidity: DRIFT;

• it violates the AGW energy source, mildly speaking

— from 2006. »Stupid PhD:s». »Says Say again». Disclaim.

— »Industrial Statistics on Energy Use is OK — but only up till 2006. From there, we take over».

That is lower than stupid. It defines, what we know, retarded, intellectually disabled.

— Did you even pass the third grade?

— You were saying?

There is nothing wrong in making a MISTAKE, on an honest foundation (HumanRight recognition). We do it all the time. And from it, we LEARN.

— Not one single word Humanright recognition in a daily culture of enterprise, not a sound,

is not a mistake. Children and even animals have it with birth: recognition of the inherited dignity, (P1 UDHR10Dec1948), ”the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”.

TURNING ONES BACK to that one definitely promotes a still deeper blindness in front of the daylight: DRIFT. Consensus. All living beings have internal Markers, both humans and animals, warning us when something is not right. Ignoring that one has nothing to do with Mistake. It is more aligned with (»Me Likey») exercising oppression:

— Retarded, low educated, intellectually disabled.

— You were saying?

Proving a clearly derailed scientific community — unless disclaimed: humanity is held in prison (1800+, compare CAP illustrated)

THAT ONLY PROVES A SERIOUS INPUT OF TAMPERING WITH THE VALUES — unless disclaimed on provable premises

— We will take a slight thorough inspection of that part in the following. Faulty statements are not allowed here.

That is a highly provable FRAUD — unless disclaimed. And we should add in light of the above revealed details and parts — not necessarily by PLAN. But definitely by a scientific community DRIFT on unobserved 150 (146) years of excellent instrumental provability (1850-2006);

— IPCC science computing modeling Aces does NOT reflect the nature of Nature.

— Not even close — unless disclaimed here.

— But the scientific community WANTS it to be so (»we are always the good guys») — unless appearing as (2006+) a prominent Fucked Up scientific society.

DRIFT CAUSE — disclaim:

— HIDE the apparently rebellious not modeleld inclusive Natural Plateau (The Wyatt group Oct2013, and others), as it apparently is proving the IPCC community to have less contact with Nature than the power feeding the modeling computer screens.

So, now (Nov2024):

— where reliable temperature data?

Apparently no longer from the CRU-data community.

— Claim whatever you want, CRU-data community. It IS a provable FRAUD.

— But please: do put forward Your proving relatable arguments, for everybod to read (weep) and see, that this statement is faulty. And we will surrender immediately and unconditionally. No problem.

However — still up to year 2006 (Attesting Wyatt)

The above Acing 2006 Key Instance seems to approve on the deforestation 37% proof — only up to year 2006 (TheExplanation).

— That is also funny, because that proof is based on the entire extension — FIT — with the original

t(NASA) curve.

The scientific modeling community is apparenly collecting real bad odds here ..

— Disclaim.

— And what we know: there is no physical or mathematical way to get rid of that fact.;

— The 2006+ New CRU data temperaturve curve breached New rail Path IS a Fraud — by so mentioned provable drift, not by plan: consequential mathematics.

The personnel apparently has no ides of what it is involved in: Nature. Disclaim.

It proves a drifting (overly in love with computer modeling for influential purposes, disclaim) scientific community that has developed more interest in Hollywood animated productions, than caring for the real world we live in.

— Disclaim. Please.

TheDRIFT: TheFRAUD

SCIENTIFC EXPLANATION OF THE SCIENCE COMMUNITY’S DRIFTED t(NASA) FRAUD 2006+

— Disclaim, anyone who can:

Shorter:

This is what the New IPCC CRU 2006 Temperatur CurveWorld Leading Aces claim, unproclaimed but provably by context, not knowing at all what they are involved in (the DRIFTING part of the their detailed provable fraud):

What the present scientific community claims:

The formative old up to 2015 t(NASA) curve

with its corresponding smoothed E-curve industrial corresponding fossil CO2 emissions extension, and all that is associated with that period of correspondence, all instrumental readouts from 1860 to 2006,

is valid — but only up to 2006.

THAT FORMULATION as a present SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY claimed knowledge:

It is a provable RETARDED — scientifically unauthorized (low educated, intellectually disabled) — claim, a so provable fraud, an intrusion in science, an attack,

• BECAUSE the t(NASA) deduced (orange) E-curve (also featuring the) industrial global energy usage MORPHOLOGY (below) have no such or any other single human group or institutional mandate for CHANGE:

• it cannot be broken by scientific consensus, parliamentary decisions, or other associative agreements:

• it is, and stays, a natural form of human cultural (technological) (logistic) evolution;

— it cannot be altered by any other power than the total humanity’s own DRIFT. And that one listens not to parliamentary decisions or science panels, or computer modeling results:(higher) consequential mathematics, it is.

That is the solid scientific mathematical proof of the comimtted fraud, the introduced 2006 breech in the original t(NASA) curvature.

— Do disclaim anyone who can, on any related found argument. Searched for. Non yet found.

ProvingTheProof: 3Nov2024 ¦ The DRIFT

REVELATION ON THE NEW CRUuea2017:

Taking the same mathematica stand as with the original t(NASA) curve, we can define the New 2017 CRUuea approach as follows (IPCCendForm2018):

The2006IPCCembezzlement: GlobalEnergyUse ¦ ProvingTheProof

PREFIXxSIN — Credit: In the 2017 original (IPCCendForm2018) the scientific community’s 2017 suddenly introducing CRUuea fraud addition (approximated) suggested a rough +4(1+3[x–9.8]²)^–5 curvature, above bottom. In this Nov2024 aftermath revisit, we have sharpened that approximation to better fit the CRUuea2017 change on the form, as above, +5(1.2+0.1[x–10.8]⁴)^–5. This match is still not exact, but exposes the essential point more in detail.

y = 6[1–1/(1+[x/10]’4)]+0.222(0.9[(2sinþx/1.48)+0.5(sin3þ[x–0.1]/1.48)])+5(1.2+0.1[x–10.8]’4)’–5 ¦ Unit50pixel

PREFIXxSIN: MAC: vertically sensed preference — RELATED [ TNED ] broad sighted perception preference: horizon [ PilotSYSTEM xyz ] TheSINE. Not the co-sine.

Easy to remember once understood; ONE encyclopedia = Problematic; TWO comparing — pieceOFcake. BeginMATH ¦ IntegralBasicFromZeroFORMalgebra — the Atom Triangle: the part closest to 0 can never be divided.

Disclaim:

THE IPCC SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY’S CRUuea2017 ORIGINAL t(NASA) PERFECTLY PROVABLE GLOBAL WARMING CURVE FRAUD — adding an invented part

from around 2006-2010, providing more IPCC FITTING POWER to the computer modeling projections which heavily disagreed with the original t(NASA) from around 2006:

— the Plateau Issue (AttestingWyatt2013)

+5(1.2+0.1[x–10.8]’4)’–5

— You ass dog lying scientifically provable down to the last mathematical atom scientifically provable stupid.

— You said scientifically provable twice.

— Yes .. and ? You want me to come again?

The words are not yet invented.

— Nature has no such sudden intrusions. Not even close to. It is just an introduced FIT, serving the apparent retarded (AGWdetails2013) computer modeling (IPCC) Climate Earth Aces:

— Apparently and so provably:

• Low educated (Tampering with World Industrial Energy Usage).

• Intellectually retarded (LESS powered by natural interest, that the computer modeling screen’s power input).

• Apparently discovered Nature manipulating A-train suckers.

— »It’s OK with 150 years matching, up till 2006 — from there, we take over».

— Get the fuck out of my beach.

Modern Academy Institutions, Teaching and Education:

— You were saying?

Disclaim.

Come again.

It is As If these suckers works like this, no offence:

— Aha .. Here we have some New NatureWantsIN .. then we must Invent something Locking that (fucking ..) Bitch Out. YOU CAN’T SHOW BOOBS and ASS simultaneously.

(And besides .. she’s sleeping with fucking everybody ..).

— We cannot handle Your Beauty. You must not be here. You kill us with your presence. Come again.

Disclaim.

— .. How do YOU handle Her?

— Exactly As she is: my luxury version.

— If you can handle that one, I guarantee you, whoever you are, She will be your best friend. 24/7. No exceptions.

(Sometimes you must hide to get at least some minor time for being alone .. it’s like Magnetic .. Guys .. she’s here to kill us .. She’s the best).

— I didn’t know.

For that we are excused. But the rest of it?

— Where was the interest? Who asked? Respect and admiration for Nature? Where?

Once we have understood the bad side of a thing, the road is always open for a new start.

REDUCED AMOUNT OF SUN LIGHT ENERGY UPTAKING LEAF&NEEDLE DEFINES REDUCED LIFE POWER. Disclaim. THEY MADE US [SIMARD2012]. AND WE FEEL THE HURT WHEN THEY ARE KILLED.

WHERE IS THE DAILY OPINION? You call this Respect and Admiration for Nature? Sane humans don’t do this. Not even close. Disclaim.

So, in other words, unless disclaimed by relatatble arguments:

— Again: Return to IPCCversusRelated ¦ RelatedPhotoSynthesis and see how Lucky we are:

The intrusions are several (we have to see it to believe it .. ):

IPCC community and other provable Nature 2006 tampering Aces:

GlobalEnergyUse: TheDRIFT

E: The AGW temperature curve and its corresponding energy function — as seen by the oceans — 2010 Wikipedia

Related physics and mathematics: The Total black global industrial related to the generalized world energy usage trend smoothed Orange t¦E(NASA) original is approximately vindicated by the first part dipping and the second part overshooting, give or take some uncertainties.

— Around 2006 (The2006IPCCembezzlement) (EPILOGUE — IPCC community’s Global Warming Projections) the IPCC community (do correct if faulty) creates — invents apparently completely unaware of what they are doing — a breach in the above Global Fossil Carbon Emissions world statistics, certifying that the history up till then is ”OK”, but not from 2006.

— The IPCC community deals with CLIMATE (ArrheniusMATH) mathematics. While related physics — the basic Global Fossil Carbon Emissions — deal with POLLUTION mathematics: the AGW-proof. The IPCC community is not even close to the basics in there (it becomes upset and angry when questioned, as documented). However, as the IPCC is unconscious of all that, the IPCC community Gladly Continues on its end Journey towards The High Pace Predictable Crash against the Solid Mountain. And as so now proven, unless some other prominent asshole comes around with a more profound proof.

OriginalGlobalFossilOceanSmoothed: The2006IPCCembezzlement

The2006MalversatedIPCCVersion: OriginalGlobalFossilOceanSmoothed ¦ The2006IPCCembezzlement

Definitely and most certainly not a mistake. It is most certainly an intrusion upon reality — proving the existence of a well established academic consortium (IPCC, do correct if faulty) having more interest in inventing new physics than checking on the power line input connections.

— You were saying?

The2006IPCCembezzlementRem: The2006IPCCembezzlement

PREFIXxSIN — Credit: In the 2017 original (IPCCendForm2018) the scientific community’s 2017 suddenly introducing CRUuea fraud addition (approximated) suggested a rough +4(1+3[x–9.8]²)^–5 curvature, above bottom. In this Nov2024 aftermath revisit, we have sharpened that approximation to better fit the CRUuea2017 change on the form, as above, +5(1.2+0.1[x–10.8]⁴)^–5. This match is still not exact, but exposes the essential point more in detail.

y = 6[1–1/(1+[x/10]’4)]+0.222(0.9[(2sinþx/1.48)+0.5(sin3þ[x–0.1]/1.48)])+5(1.2+0.1[x–10.8]’4)’–5 ¦ Unit50pixel

PREFIXxSIN: MAC: vertically sensed preference — RELATED [ TNED ] broad sighted perception preference: horizon [ PilotSYSTEM xyz ] TheSINE. Not the co-sine.

Easy to remember once understood; ONE encyclopedia = Problematic; TWO comparing — pieceOFcake. BeginMATH ¦ IntegralBasicFromZeroFORMalgebra — the Atom Triangle: the part closest to 0 can never be divided.

Original t¦E(NASA)¦ WorldEnergy/Fossile consumption smoothed oceanic uptaking temperature-energy function GLOBAL FOSSIL CARBON EMISSIONS Wikipedia 2010

unconscious embezzelement — OMEDVETEN FÖRSKINGRING

— vad vi vet: det mest ointelligenta omdömeslösa slarviga oengagerade uppträde som någonsin i sitt slag existerat i mänsklighetens historia

A world wide @Internet New CRUuea apparently Vandalized Inflicted and Inflated clearly Invented mendacious and untruthful untrue FALSE and clearly embezzled misappropriated peculated fraudulent LIE malversated conversion VERSION as apparently invented from around 2006 (observed/launched some 2017, but no here exact date is known).— You call this science, IPCC-community? A clear cut introduced fucking lying retarded fraud. — You don’t know at all what it is that you are involved in. We cannot accuse anyone for being Ignorant. That is how we learn. But we can make a remark that some asshole definitely have issues with intelligence. — IPCC: Can you spell Serious without reading help?

IPCC community computer Ace PhD modeling Personnel:

— You were saying?

Definitely and most certainly not a mistake. It is most certainly an intrusion upon reality — proving the existence of a well established academic consortium (IPCC, do correct if faulty) having more interest in inventing new physics than checking on the power line input connections.

— You were saying?

You — we — can’t tamper with human culture natural evolving — logistic — processes, invent breakpoints ”by academic consenting computer modeling”, or other vandalization enterprise, although it is obvious you do the best to try and computer model such (you sick ego power sucking fuck, disclaim, excuse the language), apparently not at all aware of what it is that you are involved in: The CRUea2017 provable fraud by drift: ignorance and a now also well proven specific scientific stupidity.

— Did you even pass the third grade?

There are no breaches in a continuum, no sharp edges on a straight road, no corners on a perfect sphere.

Do you surrender freely?

— You were saying?

Do you understand what you have done?

— »It’s OK up to 2006. After that, we take over».

I wouldn’t even let you borrow the key to the shit house after this, jeopardizing its possible future for the rest of mankind (too).

— But the real point in this is: If you do understand what you have done, you are most welcome.

The global warming complex (AGW) is NOT a climate issue: no Arrhenius math.

The global warming complex (AGW) is a POLLUTION issue (Global Fossil Carbon Emissions Statistics, no modeling, just measuring the volumes).

Wake up.

Alternatively:

— These statements here are an absolute complete nonsense.

Show the examples by related arguments in teaching and education.

Related physics and mathematics — not mentioined in modern quarters

And so it all appears proven:

— The IPCC community never got this:

Right synthesizing Fossil Energy summing (preferentially as seen by the oceans over time) of the left global industrial statistics:

y = 6[1–1/(1+[x/10]’4)] ¦ GraphInputEnergyEquation

Given also the t(NASA) original from 1850 — apparently ”The Hidden Spouse” to the global Statistic — we only had to find the mathematical form for the E-part — and the ocean periods — and their as close as possible FIT (sensitive Concept in Modern quartes: retarded, low educated, intellectually disabled) to the actual »Master t(NASA)» temperature curve. That all, in order to secure — no theory, just equalizing math (what education do you have .?) — a genuine cooperating function with the actual industrial global statistics.

— You know, the general simple 1 + 1 = 2. Very tricky stuff in modern corridors. MustBuyBook.

VeryHiQ.

The IPCC community apparently never understod or realized that the (AGW) global warming complex is all about The Oceans (water’s high heat capacitivity), their ability to absorb and preserve heat during long periods.

And — the IPCC community miss — that THAT complex reflects the entire human industry fossil carbon emissions, left above, same complex (right above) as the statistically accounted Global Fossile Energy specifications (as seen by the oceans over time,as suggested by the tNASA original).

In the Related treatise of the AGW complex (2009+), we — hence — never had to borther on any THEORY. Only already measured volumes. Type »Perfect Assembly» — or not at all.

Now that we have seen this remarkable IPCC community’s

— »OK up to 2006, from there we take over», we have certainly (at least) a round 150 years of certified concordance (1850-2006) between the original t(NASA) and the corresponding industrial global fossil statistics and its (ocean) smoothed E-version. So, by all means, there should be no doubt whatsoever on the reliability of the original t(NASA) values, however (launched 2017) apparently mendaciously changed by the IPCC community on values (and scales) from around 2006.

— Their apparent (AttestingWyatt2013) future also from 2006 should therefore equally be considered. However at present with a broken continuity on credit of the actual IPCC2006-2017 embezzlement.

IPCCHeatIntrusion2010: The2006IPCCembezzlementRem

IPCC2018in2010 ¦ TheIPCCfraudCollected

Shorter (consequential mathematics):

The IPCC community certainly and by curvature principle certifies the original t/NASA) concordance,

which concordance IS the related physics and mathematics AGW proof.

— But the IPCC community has no idea of the underlying proved mathematics:

Searched for. Not found.

— The IPCC community has no record of the AGW-proof mathematics.

— BUT the IPCC community apparently still certifies a such AGW-proof, as the IPCC community apparently certifies the above concordance in their Global Fossil Carbon Emission The2006IPCCembezzlement — but so only up to the year around 2006 where the IPCC community fraud is launched by quantity, the actual curvature breach.

That IPCC breach defines a violation of the world global fossil carbon emission statistics (from year 2006 and further). And that proves the 2006+ IPCC fraud

— at the same time apparently attesting the genuinity of the related physics AGW proof, apparently especially on its level of precise mathematics.

So, IPCC community:

— You were saying?

SammanfattningIPCC:

Sammanfattning — IPCC värmeinbrottet från runt 2006

MED en till synes helt galant och perfekt förklaring både i fysik och matematik

t(NASA), global (1) temperaturmätning (från runt 1850)

GE, Global energistatistik (från 1700-talet)

HGE, en (2) utjämnad GE trendkurva (E) som visar temperaturökningens allmänna form

HP, (3) två periodiska sinusfunktioner,

Amplitusdsumman (4) som visar HP + HGE = t(NASA)

bryter sig in i den så väl definierade kontinuiteten av bokförd och samstämmig industristatistik på följande sätt:

IPCCconsensus:

— Ett uppkommet IPCC vetenskapligt samfund uppfattar E-kurvans form som ett atmosfäriskt uppkommet fenomen från den industriella globala långvariga fossilförbränningen (Arrhenius klimatrelaterade matematik; den är logaritmisk). Inte som en förorening (vars matematik är hyperbolisk, bevisdelarna som ovan i 1-5).

— IPCC samfundets kollaboratörer genomför tydligen helt ovetande om det sammanhanget omfattande datorbaserade modelleringar på sin så fatalt tydligt missriktade matematikgrund — och förstår inte bättre än att de samtidigt håller på att göra våld på den redan bevisade industristatistiken: den som enligt deras uppfattning tydligen inte alls ingår i Modellen. Hur det kommer att sluta är, naturligtvis, förutbestämt in till sista atomen. Kurvskarorna ovan är beviset: ”Global Warming Projections”. Kopplingen till industristatistiken bryts — förskingras, förnekas, göms undan, körs över — med början från ca 2006: för att eliminera det etablerade sakvetenskapliga modellhotet från den tillfälliga Naturligt Bevisade horisontaldelen (”pausen”) från ca år 2000. Rätta gärna om fel.

IPCC2006Embezzlement

Någonstans omkring 2017 (ytterst svårt att få fram några uppgifter alls) presenterar IPCC samfundet sin bild av saken, fortfarande tydligen helt omedveten om det egna bedrägliga förskingrande fatala missgreppet (TheIPCCfraudCollected).

SummingIPCCFraud: The2006IPCCembezzlement

DET ETABLERADE NATURVETENSKAPLIGA IPCC SAMFUNDET INFÖR EN PLÖTSLIG VÄRMESTEGRANDE KOMPONENT RUNT 2006 SOM GÖMMER UNDAN DEN NATURLIGA PLATÅN (2000-2035) SOM ANNARS RASERAR HELA IPCC SAMFUNDETS BETYGADE VETENSKAPLIGA KÄRLEK TILL KOMPLEXETS SAMMANHANG. Rätta gärna om fel.

Naturförklaringen med detaljerad matematik, relaterad fysik och matematik sammanställt för UniversumsHistoria 3Nov2024

PREFIXxSIN — Credit: In the 2017 original (IPCCendForm2018) the scientific community’s 2017 suddenly introducing CRUuea fraud addition (approximated) suggested a rough +4(1+3[x–9.8]²)^–5 curvature, above bottom. In this Nov2024 aftermath revisit, we have sharpened that approximation to better fit the CRUuea2017 change on the form, as above, +5(1.2+0.1[x–10.8]⁴)^–5. This match is still not exact, but exposes the essential point more in detail.

y = 6[1–1/(1+[x/10]’4)]+0.222(0.9[(2sinþx/1.48)+0.5(sin3þ[x–0.1]/1.48)])+5(1.2+0.1[x–10.8]’4)’–5 ¦ Unit50pixel

PREFIXxSIN: MAC: vertically sensed preference — RELATED [ TNED ] broad sighted perception preference: horizon [ PilotSYSTEM xyz ] TheSINE. Not the co-sine.

Easy to remember once understood; ONE encyclopedia = Problematic; TWO comparing — pieceOFcake. BeginMATH ¦ IntegralBasicFromZeroFORMalgebra — the Atom Triangle: the part closest to 0 can never be divided.

Modern Academia Teaching and Education on Basic Mathematics:

— You were saying?

It should be written and illustrated all over The Walls. Perfect Artistry. Timeless Knowledge. Honoring LIFE — structural Biochemistry. Technology Basics. Shoe Humanity The Basics. All Science Branches. Cut it into stone.

— IPCC samfundet ser inte den rent matematiskt definierade E-formens koppling till industristatistikens rent logistiskt definierbara matematiska form — vilken blindhet gillrar hela IPCC fällan.

— IPCC samfundet ser inte den annalkande självmonterade fällan, som obönhörligt (längre fram) kommer att avslöja det fatala dikterande naturvetenskapliga bedrägeriet (även noterat [men inte direkt formulerat] av gruppen inom AttestingWyatt2013).

Rätta gärna om fel, den som så kan. Fel får inte förekomma i den här typen av framställning. Inte på något enda sätt.

— När så industristatistiken börjar glida in på 2000-talet, och amplitudsummeringen i (4) uppvisar sin väl bevisliga platå (havsperiodernas ändring kräver tusentals år: inga häftiga nymodigheter) — förstorat nedan vänster (1998-2038), samma typ men flackare som perioden 1940-1975 — grips (consequential mathematics) tydligen och så bevisligen IPCC samfundets milt sagt (så) sulliga, slarviga och tydligt ansvarslösa kollaboratörer av panik då man ser att uppmätta temperaturvärden inte alls följer de i stort samstämmigt mödosamt ihopsnickrade datormodellernas trendvärden (IPCCconsensus):

IPCCHeatIn2010Sum: IPCCHeatIntrusion2010

Say this is wrong:

— NATUE shows the scientific IPCC community — as the Creator behind this illustrated embezzlement —The Finger:

IPCC2018in2010 ¦ TheIPCCfraudCollected

Kort sagt, i fortsatt nitisk kärlek till den egna legenden:

— IPCC samfundet genomför sitt bedrägliga intrång i helhetsbilden:

Utan att veta om det, blind för allt utom det egna, fortsätter man att köra över den redan fastställda industristatistiken genom att införa — uppfinna — ett brott i denna från ca 2006 och framåt, just för att kunna behålla den redan etablerade tydligt falska idén i hela komplexet. Och det, också tydligen helt ovetande, samtidigt som man behåller den föregående t(NASA) samhörande E-formerade industristatistiken från 1850-2006.

— »Den är OK, upp till 2006. Därifrån tar Vi över — söddö, mäddä»

Det är i summeringen alldeles tydligt att IPCC samfundets aktiva PhD:are bara har ögon för de egna idéerna, och hyser mera kärlek till dessa, än intresset att kolla upp strömuttagen till datorerna och deras energiomsättning för själva bildpresentationen.

— Efterblivna, lågutbildade, intellektuellt avskärmade. Rätta gärna om fel.

Och så slutade den historien. Rätta gärna om fel.

EPILOGUE ¦ AGWdetails2013 ¦ LogisticScienceREF ¦ OceanPeriods ¦ TheAGWProof ¦ AttestingWyatt2013 ¦ IPCC2006Embezzlement ¦ REVISITINGtNASAoriginal ¦ TheFRAUD ¦ TheIPCCfraudCollected ¦ TheDRIFT

ProvingTheProof ¦ The2006IPCCembezzlement ¦ GlobalEnergyUse ¦ OriginalGlobalFossilOceanSmoothed ¦ The2006MalversatedIPCCVersion ¦ The2006IPCCembezzlementRem ¦ IPCCHeatIntrusion2010

SammanfattningIPCC ¦ IPCCconsensus ¦ SummingIPCCFraud ¦ IPCCHeatIn2010Sum ¦

GrundsambandCO2Plus: CO2heatCollector

Värmemotstånd

Basic physical Analogies

Q = it → AS ; electric charge

E = UQ = Uit = Pt → J ; energy ¦ h = mcr ¦ Planck constant 6.62559 T34 JS

= hf ; P = hf ² ¦ T(Wien) = k/L = kf/c = f (K=k/c); Temperature ↔ frequency ↔ Energy

i = U/R → A ; floating current

analogy i = P/U = U/R; P/U = U/R; P = U²/R; U² → Temperature

P = T/R ; floating heat ¦ P=f ² ¦ temperature ÷ Thermal or Heat resistance

R = U/i → V/A ; electric resistance, thermal resistance

1/R = i/U → A/V ; electric conductance ¦ also THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY

P = Ui → W=VA ; general electric POWER, general physics POWER [ Sw. effekt — »efficacy» ] property, W

= E/t ; general mechanic POWER

T/R = P → °K/(°C/W) ; radiative POWER, W

Rth = T/P → °C/W ; thermal resistance standard material property tabled material values, 1°C = 1°K denotation th, thermal

RthM = MT/P → M°C/W ; M meter unit

1/RthM = P/MT → W/M°C ;

= λ ; heat conductivity (Greek., lambda) standard material property

= P/M°C ; heat conductivity (Greek., lambda) standard material property

= 1/R ;

R = RthM ; heat conductivity (Greek., lambda) standard material property

λ = 1/R ; W/M°C

= 1/RthM → W/M°C ; heat conductivity (Greek., lambda) standard material property

= 0.024 W/M°C ; @EARTHatmosphereAIRmean ¦ ENGINEERING TOOLBOX 20Dec2017

------------------

λM = 1/Rth ;

Rth = 1/λM ;

T₀ = 15°C ; constant, general global Earth surface land-marine average annual temperature

Rm₀ = T₀/P₀ ; Luftmarina medeltemperaturen per solära instrålningseffekten

Rm₀ = 15°C·M/250W ; constant Ground AirMarine EARTH radiative power resistance :

— it holds accurately provided the T-change is small relative T0;

— OR: if the chage leaves a small region as »the last resort», the result refers to the rest accurately.

= 0.06 M°C/W ; EARTH Atmos Ground Thermal Resitance ¦ M meter

λ = 0.024 W/M°K¦°C ; luftens värmeledning tabellvärdet ¦ ENGINEERING TOOLBOX 20Dec2017 ¦ AirHeatConductivity

Rm = 41.667 M°C/W ; luftens metriska värmemotstånd ¦ medlevärde, alla luftgaser ¦ The metric R

= 1/λ ;

λ = 1/Rm ;

Rm/M = 41.667 °C/W ; luftens strålära värmemotstånd

= Rr ; The radiative R

GruindsambandCO2PlusEND:

GrundsambandCO2Plus

CO2heatCollector:

Utvidgad framställning 2024 från originalet i Värmemotstånd 2015¦16

INVERKAN FRÅN CO2 TILLSKOTT PÅ JORDYTANS NÄRMASTE TEMPERATURSKIKT

— GLOBALT UTGÅNGSVÄRDE I OFÖRSTÖRD NATURSKOG (MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2): 15°C GLOBALT ÅRSMEDELVÄRDE

TheAGWproof ¦ TheIPCCfraudCollected

The entire mathematics bottom line in this treatise is quite simple:

Taking the fraction between the present thermal resistance (°C/W) of the cover of the Earth land marine region, over any smallest change in that same quantity (like [1+x]/1), defines a corresponding temperature increase. That is the ΔT part. ΔT defines a temperature contribution from any additional CO2 in Earth’s atmosphere.

Utgångspunkten är följande tabell med de angivna luftgasernas specifika värden (Naturskogen MLN1812) — inget extra atmosfäriskt CO2; normalnivå 284ppmvCO2:

Gastabellen: CO2heatCollector

NOTE: Changing the fraction of any of the gases in the complex demands that the entire table has to be recalculated for every new test, certifying that the sum of all the gases equals 100% — based on the ideal mass of Earths atmosphere. Testing several (changing) gases will (therefore) pose a (somewhat) tricky mathematical excursion. In this example, we only care about changes in the CO2 content, which makes the recalculation (somewhat) easier.

— Increasing one gas’ mass, entails a principle corresponding decrease of all the others. Only 100% holds.

AM2015A.ods — Tabell3 A32

SAMBAND — 1/0,024 = 41.666.. motsvarar efterföljande ΔRm + Rm₀ = R:

ΔT = 15°C[0.024(1/0.024 + ..) – 1] ; °C ¦ ovanstående ger ΔT = 0°C — mera CO2 ger ΔT>0

OpenOffice ClCard: — beräkningskortet med inställningen som ger tabellresultatet ovan.

Summeringen 41.66 + görs på samtliga luftgaser och deras procentuella andel i hela atmosfären, relativt deras särskilda termiska ledningsvärden (tabellvärden från särskilda materialkällor). Eftersom, om vi har träffat rätt, ΔT värdet endast omfattar motsvarande ändring av konstanten 15°C i den landmarina Jordkroppens närmaste ytavsnitt, och alltså inte hela Jordatmosfären (5.3 T18 KG) som sådan, finns vad vi vet här ingen direkt ansats för att kunna ifrågasätta själva resultatbildens rent fysiska trovärdighet. Vi ser, nämligen Global Warming Projections, att IPCC samfundets motsvarande räkningar inte alls ansluter till den här resultatbilden (heller). Deras värden skjuter skyhögt över de resultat som nås genom ovanstående förutsättningar. Rätta gärna om fel.

Se särskilt i TheIPCCfraudCollected — anledningen bakom olikheterna.

IPCC2018in2010 ¦ TheIPCCfraudCollected

HÄRLEDNING — inledande GrundsambandCO2plus som ger:

Vi använder avsnittet i Värmemotstånd

BEVISET FÖR DEN EXTRA ICKE FOSSILRELATERADE KOLDIOXIDEMISSIONENS BETYDELSE i originalförfattningen från 20Okt2015, här i mera relaterad tappning:

Grundsambandet för termisk resistans R = T/P = °C/W med särskilda materialdata (tillgängliga tabellverk) på de olika luftgasernas egenskaper används enligt följande — utvecklingen är i sig strängt enkelt matematisk, algebraisk:

ΔRm + Rm₀ = R ; R — changes with ±CO2 : (ΔRm + Rm₀) entire atmosphere

percentage per gas element must be recalculated anew for each new CO2 change, or other

————————————————————

ΔT + T₀ = T ; från T0 = 15°C ges ett tillägg på ΔT via extra tillfört CO2 — viaväxande R:

————————————————————

ΔT = T – T₀ ; vi ska försöka grovberäkna det extra temperaturtillägget ΔT

ΔT = TR/R – T₀ ; substitution med T/T ..

1/R = 1/(ΔRm + Rm₀) ; insättning av 1/R ekvivalenten

1/R = λ ; generella förhållandet mellan termisk resistans och termisk konduktans, tabellen

ΔT = T₀λ(ΔRm + Rm₀) – T₀ ; slutmålet uppnått.

ΔT = T₀[λ(1/λ + ..) – 1] ;

ΔRm + Rm₀ → changes with ±CO2 or other ± gas : (ΔRm + Rm₀) entire atmosphere

The gas percentage thermal resistance per gas element must be recalculated and summed up anew for each new CO2 change, or other;

ΔT = 15°C[0.024(1/0.024 + ..) – 1] ; °C

The ΔT result exposes the additional temperature increase in °C over the 15°C present global (or other given fix) in the general atmospheric Earth land marine layer.

Koldioxidgasen CO2 har som vi ser i Gastabellen, det allra högsta talvärdet för egenskapen värmemotstånd (termisk resistivitet, °C/W — vilket beror av de s.k. frihetsgraderna: CO2 molekylen kan ta upp rörelseenergi i flera olika rotationsmoment, och på den vägen lagra tillskottsvärme från någon värmekälla ).

Eftersom vi (tydligen) avhandlar en marknära global årsmedeltemperatur på 15°C som konstant referens, blir alla överläggningar med ändringar via extra tillskott av CO2 enbart tillägnad just den markmarina delen (vare sig dessa samband vill mena att så är fallet eller inte; Vilket som gäller blir en senare fråga, om alls).

Totala temperaturen (T) sammansätts då av normaltemperaturen (T0 = 15°C) och en extra CO2 förorsakad temperatur (ΔT). I beräkningen av ΔT ingår då en omräkning i hela Gastabellen, för varje särskilt ppmvCO2 värde, av slutvärdet för den ovan sammansatta total termiska resistansen

R = ΔRm + Rm₀

R-värdet blir då, om ppmvCO2 värdet är större än noll, något större än konstantvärdet 1/Rm0 = 1/0,024 = 41.666 (Tabellvärdet 0,024 från ENGINEERING TOOLBOX 20Dec2017), vilket ger det motsvarande tempteraturtillskottet

ΔT = 15°C[0.024(1/0.024 + ..) – 1]

ExampleCO2in1812to2023:

Table

Example CO2 1812-2023:

EXEMPEL — som direkt visar var skåpet står:

Det senaste (2023) årsmedelvärdet för nuvarande CO2 andel i atmosfären visas i NOAA källan LatestCO2 med värdet 419.3:

419.3 – 284 = 135.3

Insättning av +135 ppmvCO2 i inmatningsrutan för ΔT-complexet visar:

ΔT = 0.001 °C.

Med föregående (2017) samma slutsats:

Inte ens med exemplets HELA det drygt 200-åriga atmosfäriska CO2 tillskottet — nu (2023) 135ppmv under perioden 1812-2023 (211 år) — ges mera än en tusendels värmegrad i tillskott: +0,001°C.

Enbart på den grovräkningens kredit — och förutsatt att räkning, härledning och sammanhang nu verkligen också kopplar verkligheten vi lever i —

utesluts med andra ord varje möjlighet att några som helst nämnvärda AGW-bidrag kan komma i fråga — för det första — från extra tillfört icke-fossilrelaterad koldioxidemission till atmosfären. Igen: ICKE fossilt. Vad menas med det, ”icke-fossilt”?

Normal CO2-cyklisk växthusgas innehåller ingen (AGW-beviset, relaterad fysik) fossilliknande industriupphettning

(typiskt runt T = 2200°C: T/t = M/m; T = max rumstemperatur 20°C i växtvärlden). Och har därför heller ingen möjlighet att bidra med någon som helst slant i temperaturhänseende. Eller ens tydligen i någon som helst resistivt nämnvärd värmeisolerande mening. Ingen extra filt större än en suck. Koldioxidgasen (KALL) har ingen SÅDAN kraftigt värmeisolerande effekt. AGW-beviset för sin del framhåller Havet som den värmebevarande agenten, en helt annan varmkastrull än luftens tunna flyt (utförligt här i TMS: The Missing Sink Issue).

IPCC2018in2010 ¦ TheIPCCfraudCollected

Frågan uppkommer (då) naturligt: På vilken matematisk-fysikalisk grund kan någon ändå hävda något sådant — typ ICC samfundets Global Carbon Projections? Temperaturvärden som förefaller överträffa allt annat. Utom möjligheten med Arrhenius Logaritmiska klimatmatemik, finns här ingen förklaring alls till IPCC samfundets underliga utsvävningar (TheIPCCfraudCollected ¦ IPCCheatIn2010tSum). AGW-beviset för sin del (AGWochFramtiden) med havet som den värmeupptagande och värmebevarande agenten kommer aldrig högre upp än max +1.9°C (runt år 2300 förutsatt fortsatt 100% ideal fossilindustri) — RelatedAGW, tabellen med sambandet,

Bio2024.ods ¦ Tabell2 A1

— Däremot har Lokala Väderkrafterna ett och annat att tillägga om större CO2 mängder samlas på mindre områden — verkligen en överraskande upplysning:

EFFEKTEN i WATT under de summerande 211 åren 1812 till nu senast 2023 visar totalt P = absT/R = 0.02 W/M². Taget — samlat, komprimerat — över hela Jordytan 5.11 T14 M² ges

5.11 T14 M² · 0.02 W/M² = 10.22 T12 W = 10.22 TeraWatt

UTSPRITT över hela atmosfären: ingen nämnvärd inverkan alls, I stort sett helt försumbart. Men kolla en Eventuell Samling:

I Citatblocket om vindenergin i Orkaner framkommer uppgifter som klassificerar en Orkans effekt (P=E/t) i storleksordning som 1.5 TeraWatt — och en Tornado i storleksordning 6 gånger mer (9 TW). Jämför siffran ovan med 10.22 TW.

SWEDEN 2024 BaldCut Nature Design?

Summer in Mid Sweden 2024. Nature exposes open bleeding wounds.

Avskogningens fortsatta CO2 atmosfäriska dumpning bidrar

OM — som vi kan förmoda — signifikanta större extra (avskogningen) CO2 mängder dumpas på atmosfären OCH dessa mängder TILLFÄLLIGTVIS drar runt i Bygden över SMÅ områden, typiskt max några kvadratkilometer, är det alldeles tydligt inte bara ATT utan även HUR sådana extraWatter kan förorsaka både det ena och det andra. Exempel:

Hetbubblor. Stormar. Tornados, Orkaner. Häftiga åskväder (ökat atmosfäriskt kolinnehåll betyder starkt reducerat blixtmotstånd: i princip »en blixt från klar himmel»).

Med räkningen på 37% för avskogningens CO2 del i Mauna Loa värdena (2023) blir nettodelen av totalvärdet 10.22 TW lika med 3.7814 TW. Med Orkanuppgiften ovan ger det i runda tal: 2 stycken potentiellt principiellt ständigt Globalt härjande Orkaner — vars styrka enbart tillväxer med staternas fortsatt nitiska mord på Naturskogarna. Rätta gärna om fel. Sakfel får inte förekomma här.

— I SAMLAD TROPP drar en extra CO2 gas av någon större magnitud på sig särskilt uppsamlad (sol-) värme. Tryckändringar med redan givna vindriktningar, ger snabbt förstärkande effekter när värmeupptaget och därmed energikoncentrationen och krafteffekten byggs upp. Säg den förödelse av princip som inte kan följa i spåren från en sådan lokalt samlad kraft.

Notera det: Så länge det extra CO2:et finns, och om det har någon nämnvärd storlek. kommer dess möjliga samlade extrakrafter av princip att fortsätta härja. De mattas inte av, med mer än — avskogningsexemplet — den atmosfäriskt dumpade naturskogens cykliska CO2 kapital får komma tillbaka: naturlig återväxt. Kortare:

— Ge fan i att tafsa på grönskan — i någon som helst rent hindrande, naturlig tillväxande och återväxande mening.

SumminUP: Example

CO2HeatCollector results AND FURTHER DETAILS IN AGW

DEN SUMMERANDE HELHETSBILDEN Nov2024

Med den nu TheAGWproof förtydligade helhetsbilden TheIPCCfraud framstår helhetsresultatet i mera — relaterat —skarp dager. Nämligen ATT OM det nu verkligen (som en del vill påstås, vidare nedan i citat) skulle finnas extra temperaturagenter i den globala uppvärmningens spår UTÖVER det aktuella fossilbidraget i AGW-bevisets ursprungliga t(NASA), då BORDE heller inte den kurvbilden i TheAGWproof visa en Sådan följsamhet - - - - - som den faktiskt gör. Om verkligheten innefattar extra signifikanta uppvärmningskomponenter bolrde också signifikanta skillnader synes.

Vi ser ingenting sådant i AGW-bevisets t(NASA)-kurvas härledda (streckade) motsvarighet.

Överensstämmelsen är, som vi ser, mer eller mindre exakt.

Då — alltså — så INTE är fallet att någon EXTRA temperatur BOV framträder, kan vi använda resultatet i TheAGWproof för att BEMÖTA alla SÅDANA påståenden enligt följande klargörande punkter — för vidare prövning:

NASA quote:

NASA citat Nov2024 — angående METANGASEN (CH4),

dess eventuella inverkan:

” The concentration of methane in the atmosphere has more than doubled over the past 200 years.”,

” Scientists estimates that this increase is responsible for 20 to 30% of climate warming since the Industrial Revolution (which began in 1750).”,

NASA, 8Nov2024

climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/methane/?internet=121

Apparently not so — IF TheAGWproof is as tight fitting as it seems to be. A 20-30% difference would most certainly be spotted on the deduced AGW-proof fossile emission credit.

The (rough) CO2HeatCollector results exposes that the CO2 gas as such has no significant play at all in the global warming complex — excellently so proved by TheAGWproof: no significant deviation from the AGW proof deduced mathematics and its global statistics from an added CO2 gas as such. Even with the entire +135 ppmvCO2 up till now (LatestNOAA) 419.3 (2023) from (1812) 284, only an added 0.001 °C shows in the result. That, indeed, in in a perfect concord with the TheAGWproof.

Why are other sources claiming other viewpoints? Is there An Issue in there between Heat Capacity (Methane CH4 has a huge one, but not as huge as Water) and Thermal Conductivity, (Methane has about twice that of CO2 — but methane has only about 1/3 of the CO2 density: methane is definitely NOT a ground travelling gas)?

Bio2024.ods — Tabell1 A13

Sources: The ENGINEERING TOOLBOX source 2010 is now Nov2024 no longer a free open reference source. It has — as many other earlier free and open scientific references — adopted the New Billion Users Me Likey Popular World Fascistic By Drift Not Plan We Say You Do Wide Cookies Dictatorship Costume: site blocked, no access — unless consenting on the New Popular No HumanRight Recognition or Mentioning Not One Word Humanright Parliamentary World Wide State Police Justice Department Organization. For every occasion we show INTEREST in something, the New Electronic Surveilling World Eye Cookies Dictating LOCK jumps up and shuts the way. Not one word Humanright recognition or mentioning. Germany 1932. What comes next?

A20.1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

A20.2. No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

A4. No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

However, it seems that The Engineering Toolbox Cookies Personnel has missed some Blocking: There still is some available free PDF documents .. One found here on METHANE, still giving us the basic information as included in the above table. Perhaps its best to block that one too ..

METHANE CH4 Heat capacity (Cp) 35.8 J/mol°K, = 35.8/0.016 J/KG°K = 2237.5 J/KG°K

METHANE CH4 Thermal Conductivity 0.0339 W/M°; thermal resistance 1/0.0339 = 29.4985 °C/W

——

ATOMVIKT (U) ¦ anges i tabellverk i antal (här förenklat, enbart heltal) atomära massenheter (u);

1u = 1.66033 t27 KG = 1 Dalton; EX: U(6C12) = 12; 1mol 6C12 = 12/1000 KG = 0,012 KG.

Antalet u enheter i 1KG är 1/u = 6.022899062 T26; ÷ med U ger antalet (N) atomer-molekyler i 1 KG.

——

CarbonDioxide Wikipedia 8Nov2024 ¦ 1 mol = U gram av ämnet ¦ = ämnets atomvikt/1000;

Heat Capacity 37.135 J/mol°K = (37.135/0.044 = 843.977) J/KG°K

NOTE in the CO2HeatCollector results that the property of Heat Capacity (J/mol°K = J/[U(Atom¦Molecule)/1000]°K) has absolutely no representation in the air gases table. It has nothing at all to do with (AGW) global warming. Only, as exemplified, the noted possible momentary local destructive weather forces when and if type any larger CO2 amount is collected over smaller areas. The (AGW) global warming agent is water (high heat capacity). Not gas. The extra (CO2) gas distributed over the entire Earth atmosphere has only heat resistive °C/W (thermal conductive) significance. And that is, as exemplified, negligible for any significant global warming contribution. Proof: TheAGWproof: No extra °C from gas.

Claiming a general result

Collecting available material data (Engineering Toolbox, Wikipedia, NASA, Nov2024) the above table exposes the foremost important in this treatise.

WATER H2O — the definite AGW proof agency here in Universe History, its very high heat capacity (4181 J/KG°), is completely responsible for the actual fossil emission heat taken up by the oceans (the simple t/T math), says TheAGWproof . 100% relatable, every atom.

If we replace the CO2 gas in the CO2HeatCollector calculations with a Methane agent — on the fly, no actual table calculation, just the above property information — there would have to be huge, enormous, quantities of methane to contribute even to 1/10 of one degree Celsius temperature increase from 1800.

(Taking The Example total +135ppmv 1812-2023 CO2 for comparison gives only a +0.001°C).

Just as simple as that ..

Again. That (theoretical) result also matches the already suggested.

— TheAGWproof and its tight match with the original t(NASA) temperature curve, leaves no room for any significant (»even +1%») additional AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) temperature promoting agent. A such simply does not exist, TheAGWproof says.

If scientific argumentation exists here, it is high time to expose its explaining power ..

Shorter (again). Methane as an added gas to atmosphere, and in the present quantities, have absolutely no contributing potential at all, not to any kind or sort, to show a significant temperature increase on the Earth land marine region. Not even the smallest. No way.

Proof:

TheAGWproof says that. There is no other global warming agent than the fossil CO2 emissions. If there would be, also significant differences would show, and the tight fit would not be exposed. So, consequential mathematics, unless disclaimed: The human used industrial methane gas is too light, and to marginal in amount to have any global warming significance.

— Any disclaiming scientific argument on this statement is highly welcome. Because we only have TheAGWproof as the single certifying instance (and, to some extent the results in the above CO2HeatCollector calculations).

If relatable explaining disclaiming argumentation exists against TheAGWproof, that proof [the original t(NASA)] will also no longer hold, no doubt. So: please, with all your might: you are welcome to establish the scientific truth in this complex. Absolutely.

:

Except TheAGWproof, there is no global warming temperature contributor, TheAGWproof says. The entire present global warming temperature contribution comes alone, and only so, from the industrial fossil emissions: CO2. There are no other contributors in any kind of significant meaning (TheIPCCfraudCollected).

:

Even IF the methane CH4 gas suffers the same type of combustion process as the case is (as deduced) in the TheAGWproof, the low density and the lightness of CH4 has no chance in emptying its molecular combustion energy into the oceans — in any significant amount. The low density of CH4 certifies, guarantees, it will raise (fast) to the higher levels of the atmosphere, with practically no additional thermal resistive effect at all on the Earth land marine region — unless emitted in enormous huge amounts. And that is not our case, says TheAGWproof (consequential mathematics).

That is anyway the most close response of an explanation in observing the tight fitting TheAGWproof as the only explaining global warming agency.

So, the bottom line writes itself: The suggested »frightening Methane gas ticking global Warming Bomb» then has become a greatly exaggerated suggestion (possibly based on too vague insights into the actual physics of the atmosphere and its thermal properties) — unless disclaimed here by more related arguments.

(We would think 2024 that present instrumentally equipped science would have »huge insights» into our Earth AtmosBiosLitos regions. In part that is so, certainly — and in part: not at all).

CallingAtlantis:

Calling Atlantis ..

On all these revealed details as so excellently proven, as it seems all in line by TheAGWproof (2009), it is apparenly obvious that the academic scientific community as engaged in the different claims has to answer in front of the exposed revelations in determining who or what is hanging on the cross and who or what is banging in the nails. Because the Sun hasn’t stop shining either.

Related physics and mathematics

Maybe as a more prominent (resembling) reminder; compare

CAP — student’s 1800+ modern academia prison: disclaim ¦ TheLIST ¦ AllKeplerMath .. ¦ TNED

TheNEUTRONsquare and TheAtomicMasses from Elliptic Equations — WholePucture ¦ RevisitingHofstadter1956

Comparing Nuclear Masses — related versus established ¦ ComNorm — »standard universal»

The Periodic System of The Elements from Kepler Resonances (nuclear matrices algorithm [NUMA])

ThePlanckRING — h = mcr = 6.62559 t34 JS, TheNEUTRON (discovered 1932 by Chadwick)

TheQmove — the foundation of induction and magnetism in related physics and mathematics from Newton’sTHIRD

TheQmoveCaseHistory — the UniverseHistory compiled description, Nov2024

TheIntegralAnalogy between mechanics inertia (mass) and electro-physics inertia (inductance)

— Why — howcome — none of these rudimentary basics, highly and deeply relatable and explainable foundations of physics (Physics7) — none — is mentioned in established modern academic teaching system? What’sUp? Is there any explanation in there? Education? Say.

— Modern established academy:

— You were saying?

(Maybe we should Restart and begin from the basics: ”the will of the people”).

CO2heatCollector ¦ Gastabellen ¦ ExampleCO2in1812to2023 ¦ SumminUP ¦ CallingAtlantis

content:

Atomic Nucleus IV 2023XII6

innehåll: SÖK äMNESORD på denna sida Ctrl+F ·

The Atomic Nucleus

innehåll — content

2008VIII6 ¦ 2023IX10

The Atomic Nucleus IV — clarifying DeducingTHErZ connecting Angeli2004 collected results after ReHofstadter1956 in TAN2023

— and clarifying the UH-2004 (TwoCASES) original deduction to FULIMA — the universal fusion limit mass (Earth’s Second Equation)

AiCookies

WikiHumanTraffic

TheProvider

Dandelion

GravitationElectricity

Conclusion

CowExample

Recognition

MODERN

Resolution217Short

PrivacyIntelligenceRecognition

WeCaaYoPi

Intelligence

ArtificialIntelligence

Decision

GUARD

ITI — INTERRUPTING THE INDIVIDUAL — ”.. teaching and education ..”

BeREMINDED

TheWillOfThePeople

LastRESORT

MinGod0

MinGod1

y50

y1800

MinGod2

SumEJC

ExSW

FuLiMa — FusionLimitMass

Full

TheFirstREF

m0JSUBequilibrium

MATH

m0JSUBequation

PressureBASICS

k

nP

dK

m0JSUBeq

DmaxREF

Classification

NQref

InCOMPref

FULIMAr0

FULIMAdefinition

PRIME

FULIMAÑ

rZresolution2023

Ñr0

ExemplifyingÑr0

BalanceCondition

ToroidRadiusExtension

BradleyNuclearCoefficient

nBref

TwoCASES

ne

neILLUSTRATED

RESULTS

FULIMAcompressed

TrZR — The rZ RESOLUTION 2023

ShortSUMMINGCaseHistory2023

CalCards

Bio2024.ods

FULImass2023.ods

PhotoSYNTHESISsynthesis :

MLN1812 ¦ PSS12 ¦ Comparing3 ¦ ProvingSDconstant

PSSoct2024 :

Glucose6566Issue ¦ CoARTPSS24

Proof12 :

TICMS :

THE IPCC COMMUNITY:s MISSING SINK ¦ TMS ¦ Proof12 ¦ WhatMissingSINK ¦ IPCCcount ¦ LUCKILY ¦ LandUSE

HowWeKnowSDconstant :

LatestCO2

TheExplanation :

LGEref ¦ Result37 ¦ TheFinalCountdown ¦ FROMtNASA2009 ¦ SummingThe37 ¦ TCOT

EPILOGUE :

AGWdetails2013 ¦ LogisticScienceREF ¦ OceanPeriods ¦ TheAGWProof ¦ AttestingWyatt2013 ¦ IPCC2006Embezzlement ¦ REVISITINGtNASAoriginal ¦ TheFRAUD ¦ TheIPCCfraudCollected ¦ TheDRIFT

ProvingTheProof ¦ The2006IPCCembezzlement ¦ GlobalEnergyUse ¦ OriginalGlobalFossilOceanSmoothed ¦ The2006MalversatedIPCCVersion ¦ The2006IPCCembezzlementRem ¦ IPCCHeatIntrusion2010

SammanfattningIPCC ¦ IPCCconsensus ¦ SummingIPCCFraud ¦ IPCCHeatIn2010Sum ¦

GrundsambandCO2Plus :

GruindsambandCO2PlusEND

CO2heatCollector :

Gastabellen ¦ ExampleCO2in1812to2023 ¦ SumminUP ¦ CallingAtlantis

content

referenser

[HOP]. HANDBOOK OF PHYSICS, E. U. Condon, McGraw-Hill 1967

Atomviktstabellen i HOP allmän referens i denna presentation, Table 2.1 MASS TABLE ¦ s9–65—9–86 ¦

concurrent — with such minor end decimal differences with Berkeley National 2003 and Nist/Codata 2005 — having no significance in this presentation

Comparing CODATA2005-HOP1967 ¦

m_n = 1.0086652u ...................... neutronmassan i atomära massenheter (u) [HOP Table 2.1 s9–65] — neutron mass

m_e = 0.000548598u .................. elektronmassan i atomära massenheter (u) [HOP Table 10.3 s7–155 för m_e , Table 1.4 s7–27 för u]

m(1H1) = 1.007825200u .................... neutronmassan i atomära massenheter (u) [HOP Table 2.1 s9–65]

u = 1.66043 t27 KG .............. atomära massenheten [HOP Table 1.4 s7–27, 1967]

u = 1.66033 t27 KG .............. atomära massenheten [ENCARTA 99 Molecular Weight]

u = 1.66041 t27 KG ............... atomära massenheten [FOCUS MATERIEN 1975 s124sp1mn]

u = 1.66053886 t27 KG ........ atomära massenheten [teknisk kalkylator, lista med konstanter SHARP EL-506W (2005)]

u = 1.6605402 t27 KG .......... atomära massenheten [@INTERNET (2007) sv. Wikipedia]

u = 1.66053906660 t27 KG .... atomära massenheten [@INTERNET (2023) en. Wikipedia, Atomic mass]

u = 1.660538782 t27 KG ...... atomära massenheten [från www.sizes.com],

CODATA rekommendation från 2006 med toleransen ±0,000 000 083 t27 KG (Committe on Data for Science and Technology)]

c₀ = 2.99792458 T8 M/S ......... ljushastigheten i vakuum [ENCARTA 99 Light, Velocity, (uppmättes i början på 1970-talet)]

h = 6.62559 t34 JS ................. Plancks konstant [HOP s7–155]

e = 1.602 · t19 C ...................... FOCUS MATERIEN 1975s666

G = 6.670 · t11 JM/(KG)² ........ FOCUS MATERIEN 1975s666 (6,67 · 10^–11 Nm²kg^–1)

[BA]. BONNIERS ASTRONOMI 1978

— Det internationella standardverket om universum sammanställt vid universitetet i Cambridge, The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Astronomy, London 1977.

[FM]. FOCUS MATERIEN 1975 — Fysikens, kemins och astronomins historia. Allt från atomen till universum — fysik, kemi, jordvetenskap och astronomi

[BKL]. BONNIERS KONVERSATIONS LEXIKON, 12 band A(1922)-Ö(1928) med SUPPLEMENT A-Ö(1929)

t för 10^–, T för 10⁺, förenklade exponentbeteckningar

t för 10^–, T för 10⁺, förenklade exponentbeteckningar

PREFIXEN FÖR bråkdelar och potenser av FYSIKALISKA STORHETER

Här används genomgående och konsekvent beteckningarna

förkortning för förenklad potensbeteckning

d deci t1

c centi t2

m milli t3

µ mikro t6

n nano t9

p pico t12

f femto t15

Alla Enheter anges här i MKSA-systemet (M meter, KG kilo[gram], S sekund, A ampere), alla med stor bokstav, liksom följande successiva tusenprefix:

K kilo T3

M mega T6

G giga T9

T tera T12

Exempel: Medan många skriver cm för centimeter skrivs här konsekvent cM (centiMeter).

MAC, här ofta använd förkortning för Modern ACademy — etablerad vetenskap sedan början av 1800-talet

In UH often used abbreviation for modern academy — explicitly from the beginning of the 1800s

MAC — often used abbreviation in TNED for Modern ACademy

TNED — Related PHYSICS And MATHEMATICS — Se särskild djupbeskrivning av innebörden i begreppet relaterad framställning.

Toroid Nukleära Elektro MEKANISKA Dynamiken

The Atomic Nucleus -- 1 - 4 ¦ TAN 1 ¦ TAN 2 ¦ TAN 3 ¦ TAN 4 ¦ AllKeplerMath ¦ AllKeplerMath+

ArithmeticResonanses:

FOR THE UNINITIATED READER (Sep2024):

On the 10Jan2024 the below (217) specified bPETRIE (1881-1883) finally proving resolution was discovered — after some research on eventually matching integer numbers. The 217 match certifies, as we see (from The rJCIRCLE complex ¦ rJCIRCLEref) the bPETRIE 4534.40 inch specified measure with a 99.9999832% precision. It is well enough to certify the accurateness on Petrie’s Cheops Pyramid measurements. That also consolidates the rJCIRCLE investigations on the subject;

— Taking present (mJ) EarthMass on the Planck constant h=mcr deduced Neutron density Dmax gives a spherical radius of (all natural constants, plus mJ) rJ = (h/c0)(3mJ/π·m⁴)^1/3.

The center of that sphere is precisely positioned in the sectional view of the Flinders Petrie group (1881-83) measures so called Queens Chamber in the Cheops Pyramid.

The GOLDEN SECTION complex from the simple form of Cheops Rectangle bd=h² proves

(CALTEP ¦ CaseHistory) the coherences in the Petrie measured Cheops Pyramid construct. The square corners enveloping that type defined Pyramid, passes precisely on the edge of the calculated rJ sphere’s surface. That was the initial discovery on the 1Nov2017. Really.

SOON ENOUGH — after a cup of Tea, relaxing on the new discovery, the 10Jan2024 — it was realized that the number 217 also connects to another Universal domain: UDHR10Dec1948. The Resolution 217(A) universal HumanRight declaration. It is also the absolute foundation (special case history) for this production in UniverseHistory (TNEDbegin1991).

We have two Resolution 217 in our known history — detailed to the last universal atom;

IN ORDER OF DISCOVERY-RECOGNITION — Resolution 217Short:

• Resolution 217(A) UDHR10Dec1948 — Universal Declaration of Human Rights: 8 introducing paragraphs P1-8,

30 following articles A1-30 — study them and try to learn them from within (test-question-analyze, 24/7).

— Here in UH referred to as Humanright, the only (reminded) known universal Humanright knowledge domain:

gravitation, electricity: light, heat, magnetism — LIFE: The Periodic System of The Elements (KeplerResonances).

— The Atoms’ Spontaneous assembly — no decision, no voting — to you and me (and all the other fuckups).

P1: ” Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and ..”. Guaranteed Eternal Protection. 24/7. No breaks.

• Resolution 217 (10Jan2024) — the TNED deduced rJCIRCLE-CheopsPyramidEnvelopingSphereRadius (rJ) number

defines the actual Flinders Petrie 1883 measured Cheops Pyramid (half) base (b) — in to a precision of

99.9999832%. It verifies the (ContractedConstruct) TNED/Petrie investigated Cheops Building Plan: All Petrie’s measured values verified (BpointDetermination). The Complex (also, apparently: not much else left to chose on) connects to The Origin of Script. See TheCLAIM — questioning the already long ago 2000y questioned idea of a UNsanctioned Geographic Israel: the splitting of humanity — and the Quest of its reunion.

(Toroid Nuclear Electromechanical Dynamics), eller Toroidnukleära Elektromekaniska Dynamiken är den dynamiskt ekvivalenta resultatbeskrivning som följer av härledningarna i Planckringen h=m_nc₀r_n, analogt Atomkärnans Härledning. Beskrivningen enligt TNED är relaterad, vilket innebär: alla, samtliga, detaljer gör anspråk på att vara fullständigt logiskt förklarbara och begripliga, eller så inte alls. Med TNED förstås (således) också

RELATERAD FYSIK OCH MATEMATIK. Se även uppkomsten av termen TNED i Atomkärnans Härledning.

SHORT ENGLISH — TNED in general is not found @INTERNET except under this domain

(Universe[s]History, introduced @INTERNET 2008VII3).

TNED or Toroid Nuclear Electromechanical Dynamics is the dynamically equivalent resulting description following the deductions in THE PLANCK RING, analogous AtomNucleus’ Deduction. The description according to TNED is related, meaning: all, each, details claim to be fully logically explainable and understandable, or not at all. With TNED is (hence) also understood RELATED PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS. See also the emergence of the term TNED in AtomNucleus’ Deduction.

Senast uppdaterade version: 2024-11-20.

*END.

Stavningskontrollerat-SpellChecked up to: .. 14Dec2023 ¦ 9Nov2024.

rester

*

åter till portalsidan · portalsidan är www.UniversumsHistoria.se

Unicode:

≈ ∫ ∫ Δ √ Δ ≠ → ∞ γ √ ω π τ ε ħ UNICODE — ofta använda tecken i matematiska-tekniska-naturvetenskapliga beskrivningar

— Ctrl+Shift+Q i Microsoft WORD direkt till SYMBOL

σ ρ ν ν υ π τ γ λ η ≠ √ ħ ω →∞ →γ ≡ ¦ Alt+ 1..9 ☺☻♥☺♦♣♠•◘○ υ Ψ

Ω Φ Ψ Σ Π Ξ Λ Θ Δ ≈

α β γ δ ε λ θ κ π ρ τ φ ϕ σ ω ϖ ∏ √ ∑ ∂ ∆ ∫ ≤ ≈ ≥ ˂ ˃ ← ↑ → ∞ ↓

ϑ ζ γ λ ξ

Pilsymboler, direkt via tangentbordet:

Alt+24 ↑; Alt+25 ↓; Alt+26 →; Alt+27 ←; Alt+22 ▬

Alt+23 ↨ — även Alt+18 ↕; Alt+29 ↔

Senast uppdaterade version: 20 november 2024 | 11:12:22 | 2024-11-20. [GMT+1]Solar [GMT+2]Industry

*

BILDKÄLLA: Författarens arkiv · 3Jul2012 E12 Bild 198;293 · Nikon D90 · Fria Teckningar — Angående Statens och Kommunernas uppmärksammade UPPENBART SJUKA NATURUPPFATTNING — civilisationens återerövring.

Denna webbsidas ansvariga författare kan nås med e-mail på Webbadressen

¦belldharma¦SNABELA¦universumshistoria¦PUNKT¦se¦ MEN SKICKA INTE MED LÄNKAR — utom överenskommelse kasseras sådan e-post omgående

åter till portalsidan · portalsidan är www.UniversumsHistoria.se